Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |
Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release
These features were completed when this image was assembled
Problem:
Certain Insights Advisor features differentiate between RHEL and OCP advisor
Goal:
Address top priority UI misalignments between RHEL and OCP advisor. Address UI features dropped from Insights ADvisor for OCP GA.
Scope:
Specific tasks and priority of them tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-7432
This contains all the Insights Advisor widget deliverables for the OCP release 4.11.
Scope
It covers only minor bug fixes and improvements:
Show the error message (mocked in CCXDEV-5868) if the Prometheus metrics `cluster_operator_conditions{name="insights"}` contain two true conditions: UploadDegraded and Degraded at the same time. This state occurs if there was an IO archive upload error = problems with the pipeline.
Expected for 4.11 OCP release.
Scenario: Check if the Insights Advisor widget in the OCP WebConsole UI shows the time of the last data analysis Given: OCP WebConsole UI and the cluster dashboard is accessible And: CCX external data pipeline is in a working state And: administrator A1 has access to his cluster's dashboard And: Insights Operator for this cluster is sending archives When: administrator A1 clicks on the Insights Advisor widget Then: the results of the last analysis are showed in the Insights Advisor widget And: the time of the last analysis is shown in the Insights Advisor widget
Acceptance criteria:
max_over_time(timestamp(changes(insightsclient_request_send_total\{status_code="202"}[1m]) > 0)[24h:1m])
Cloning the existing rule should end up with a new rule in the same namespace.
Modifications can now be done to the new rule.
(Optional) You can silence the existing rule.
Create a new PrometheusRule object inside the namespace that includes the metrics you need to form the alerting rule.
CMO should reconcile the platform Prometheus configuration with the alert-relabel-config resources.
DoD
CMO should reconcile the platform Prometheus configuration with the AlertingRule resources.
DoD
Managing PVs at scale for a fleet creates difficulties where "one size does not fit all". The ability for SRE to deploy prometheus with PVs and have retention based an on a desired size would enable easier management of these volumes across the fleet.
The prometheus-operator exposes retentionSize.
Field | Description |
---|---|
retentionSize | Maximum amount of disk space used by blocks. Supported units: B, KB, MB, GB, TB, PB, EB. Ex: 512MB. |
This is a feature request to enable this configuration option via CMO cluster-monitoring-config ConfigMap.
Today, all configuration for setting individual, for example, routing configuration is done via a single configuration file that only admins have access to. If an environment uses multiple tenants and each tenant, for example, has different systems that they are using to notify teams in case of an issue, then someone needs to file a request w/ an admin to add the required settings.
That can be bothersome for individual teams, since requests like that usually disappear in the backlog of an administrator. At the same time, administrators might get tons of requests that they have to look at and prioritize, which takes them away from more crucial work.
We would like to introduce a more self service approach whereas individual teams can create their own configuration for their needs w/o the administrators involvement.
Last but not least, since Monitoring is deployed as a Core service of OpenShift there are multiple restrictions that the SRE team has to apply to all OSD and ROSA clusters. One restriction is the ability for customers to use the central Alertmanager that is owned and managed by the SRE team. They can't give access to the central managed secret due to security concerns so that users can add their own routing information.
Provide a new API (based on the Operator CRD approach) as part of the Prometheus Operator that allows creating a subset of the Alertmanager configuration without touching the central Alertmanager configuration file.
Please note that we do not plan to support additional individual webhooks with this work. Customers will need to deploy their own version of the third party webhooks.
Team A wants to send all their important notifications to a specific Slack channel.
* CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
* Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
* DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
* DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
* DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
* QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
* QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
* DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Now that upstream supports AlertmanagerConfig v1beta1 (see MON-2290 and https://github.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/pull/4709), it should be deployed by CMO.
DoD:
Copy/paste from [_https://github.com/openshift-cs/managed-openshift/issues/60_]
Which service is this feature request for?
OpenShift Dedicated and Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS
What are you trying to do?
Allow ROSA/OSD to integrate with AWS Managed Prometheus.
Describe the solution you'd like
Remote-write of metrics is supported in OpenShift but it does not work with AWS Managed Prometheus since AWS Managed Prometheus requires AWS SigV4 auth.
Describe alternatives you've considered
There is the workaround to use the "AWS SigV4 Proxy" but I'd think this is not properly supported by RH.
https://mobb.ninja/docs/rosa/cluster-metrics-to-aws-prometheus/
Additional context
The customer wants to use an open and portable solution to centralize metrics storage and analysis. If they also deploy to other clouds, they don't want to have to re-configure. Since most clouds offer a Prometheus service (or it's easy to self-manage Prometheus), app migration should be simplified.
The cluster monitoring operator should allow OpenShift customers to configure remote write with all authentication methods supported by upstream Prometheus.
We will extend CMO's configuration API to support the following authentications with remote write:
Customers want to send metrics to AWS Managed Prometheus that require sigv4 authentication (see https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prometheus/latest/userguide/AMP-secure-metric-ingestion.html#AMP-secure-auth).
Prometheus and Prometheus operator already support custom Authorization for remote write. This should be possible to configure the same in the CMO configuration:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: cluster-monitoring-config
namespace: openshift-monitoring
data:
config.yaml: |
prometheusK8s:
remoteWrite:
- url: "https://remote-write.endpoint"
Authorization:
type: Bearer
credentials:
name: credentials
key: token
DoD:
Prometheus and Prometheus operator already support sigv4 authentication for remote write. This should be possible to configure the same in the CMO configuration:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: cluster-monitoring-config
namespace: openshift-monitoring
data:
config.yaml: |
prometheusK8s:
remoteWrite:
- url: "https://remote-write.endpoint"
sigv4:
accessKey:
name: aws-credentialss
key: access
secretKey:
name: aws-credentials
key: secret
profile: "SomeProfile"
roleArn: "SomeRoleArn"
DoD:
As WMCO user, I want to make sure containerd logging information has been updated in documents and scripts.
Configure audit logging to capture login, logout and login failure details
TODO(PM): update this
Customer who needs login, logout and login failure details inside the openshift container platform.
I have checked for this on my test cluster but the audit logs do not contain any user name specifying login or logout details. For successful logins or logout, on CLI and openshift console as well we can see 'Login successful' or 'Invalid credentials'.
Expected results: Login, logout and login failures should be captured in audit logging.
The apiserver pods today have ´/var/log/<kube|oauth|openshift>-apiserver` mounted from the host and create audit files there using the upstream audit event format (JSON lines following https://github.com/kubernetes/apiserver/blob/92392ef22153d75b3645b0ae339f89c12767fb52/pkg/apis/audit/v1/types.go#L72). These events are apiserver specific, but as oauth authentication flow events are also requests, we can use the apiserver event format to log logins, login failures and logouts. Hence, we propose to make oauth-server to create /var/log/oauth-server/audit.log files on the master nodes using that format.
When the login flow does not finish within a certain time (e.g. 10min), we can artificially create an event to show a login failure in the audit logs.
Let the Cluster Authentication Operator deliver the policy to OAuthServer.
In order to know if authn events should be logged, OAuthServer needs to be aware of it.
* Stanislav LázničkaCreate an observer to deliver the audit policy to the oauth server
Make the authentication-operator react to the new audit field in the oauth.config/cluster object. Write an observer watching this field, such an observer will translate the top-level configuration into oauth-server config and add it to the rest of the observed config.
Right now there's no way to generate audit logs from this.
Right now there's no way to generate audit logs from this.
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.
While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.
For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.
Requirement | Notes | isMvp? |
---|---|---|
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation | This is a requirement for ALL features. | YES |
Release Technical Enablement | Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. | YES |
This Section:
This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.
Questions to be addressed:
This is a ticket meant to track all the all the OCP PRs that are involved in the implementation of the SNO + workers enhancement
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->
Rebase openshift/builder to k8s 1.24
The AWS-specific code added in OCPPLAN-6006 needs to become GA and with this we want to introduce a couple of Day2 improvements.
Currently the AWS tags are defined and applied at installation time only and saved in the infrastructure CRD's status field for further operator use, which in turn just add the tags during creation.
Saving in the status field means it's not included in Velero backups, which is a crucial feature for customers and Day2.
Thus the status.resourceTags field should be deprecated in favour of a newly created spec.resourceTags with the same content. The installer should only populate the spec, consumers of the infrastructure CRD must favour the spec over the status definition if both are supplied, otherwise the status should be honored and a warning shall be issued.
Being part of the spec, the behaviour should also tag existing resources that do not have the tags yet and once the tags in the infrastructure CRD are changed all the AWS resources should be updated accordingly.
On AWS this can be done without re-creating any resources (the behaviour is basically an upsert by tag key) and is possible without service interruption as it is a metadata operation.
Tag deletes continue to be out of scope, as the customer can still have custom tags applied to the resources that we do not want to delete.
Due to the ongoing intree/out of tree split on the cloud and CSI providers, this should not apply to clusters with intree providers (!= "external").
Once confident we have all components updated, we should introduce an end2end test that makes sure we never create resources that are untagged.
After that, we can remove the experimental flag and make this a GA feature.
Requirement | Notes | isMvp? |
---|---|---|
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation | This is a requirement for ALL features. | YES |
Release Technical Enablement | Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. | YES |
List any affected packages or components.
RFE-1101 described user defined tags for AWS resources provisioned by an OCP cluster. Currently user can define tags which are added to the resources during creation. These tags cannot be updated subsequently. The propagation of the tags is controlled using experimental flag. Before this feature goes GA we should define and implement a mechanism to exclude any experimental flags. Day2 operations and deletion of tags is not in the scope.
RFE-2012 aims to make the user-defined resource tags feature GA. This means that user defined tags should be updatable.
Currently the user-defined tags during install are passed directly as parameters of the Machine and Machineset resources for the master and worker. As a result these tags cannot be updated by consulting the Infrastructure resource of the cluster where the user defined tags are written.
The MCO should be changed such that during provisioning the MCO looks up the values of the tags in the Infrastructure resource and adds the tags during creation of the EC2 resources. The MCO should also watch the infrastructure resource for changes and when the resource tags are updated it should update the tags on the EC2 instances without restarts.
Acceptance Criteria:
When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release
DoD
DoD
We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.
There are definitely grey areas, but in general:
Questions to be addressed:
Create a PR in openshift/cluster-ingress-operator to implement configurable router probe timeouts.
The PR should include the following:
User Story: As a customer in a highly regulated environment, I need the ability to secure DNS traffic when forwarding requests to upstream resolvers so that I can ensure additional DNS traffic and data privacy.
tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example
While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.
One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.
I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.
We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.
Relevant links:
In OCP 4.8 the router was changed to use the "random" balancing algorithm for non-passthrough routes by default. It was previously "leastconn".
Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007581 shows that using "random" by default incurs significant memory overhead for each backend that uses it.
PR https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/663
reverted the change and made "leastconn" the default again (OCP 4.8 onwards).
The analysis in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007581#c40 shows that the default haproxy behaviour is to multiply the weight (specified in the route CR) by 16 as it builds its data structures for each backend. If no weight is specified then openshift-router sets the weight to 256. If you have many, many thousands of routes then this balloons quickly and leads to a significant increase in memory usage, as highlighted by customer cases attached to BZ#2007581.
The purpose of this issue is to both explore changing the openshift-router default weight (i.e., 256) to something smaller, or indeed unset (assuming no explicit weight has been requested), and to measure the memory usage within the context of the existing perf&scale tests that we use for vetting new haproxy releases.
It may be that the low-hanging change is to not default to weight=256 for backends that only have one pod replica (i.e., if no value specified, and there is only 1 pod replica, then don't default to 256 for that single server entry).
Outcome: does changing the [default] weight value make it feasible to switch back to "random" as the default balancing algorithm for a future OCP release.
Revert router to using "random" once again in 4.11 once analysis is done on impact of weight and static memory allocation.
Per the 4.6.30 Monitoring DNS Post Mortem, we should add E2E tests to openshift/cluster-dns-operator to reduce the risk that changes to our CoreDNS configuration break DNS resolution for clients.
To begin with, we add E2E DNS testing for 2 or 3 client libraries to establish a framework for testing DNS resolvers; the work of adding additional client libraries to this framework can be left for follow-up stories. Two common libraries are Go's resolver and glibc's resolver. A somewhat common library that is known to have quirks is musl libc's resolver, which uses a shorter timeout value than glibc's resolver and reportedly has issues with the EDNS0 protocol extension. It would also make sense to test Java or other popular languages or runtimes that have their own resolvers.
Additionally, as talked about in our DNS Issue Retro & Testing Coverage meeting on Feb 28th 2024, we also decided to add a test for testing a non-EDNS0 query for a larger than 512 byte record, as once was an issue in bug OCPBUGS-27397.
The ultimate goal is that the test will inform us when a change to OpenShift's DNS or networking has an effect that may impact end-user applications.
Requirement | Notes | isMvp? |
---|
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation | This is a requirement for ALL features. | YES |
Release Technical Enablement | Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. | YES |
This Section:
This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.
Questions to be addressed:
During master nodes upgrade when nodes are getting drained there's currently no protection from two or more operands going down. If your component is required to be available during upgrade or other voluntary disruptions, please consider deploying PDB to protect your operands.
The effort is tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WRKLDS-293.
Example:
Acceptance Criteria:
1. Create PDB controller in console-operator for both console and downloads pods
2. Add e2e tests for PDB in single node and multi node cluster
Note: We should consider to backport this to 4.10
Goal
Add support for PDB (Pod Disruption Budget) to the console.
Requirements:
Designs:
When viewing the Installed Operators list set to 'All projects' and then selecting an operator that is available in 'All namespaces' (globally installed,) upon clicking the operator to view its details the user is taken into the details of that operator in installed namespace (project selector will switch to the install namespace.)
This can be disorienting then to look at the lists of custom resource instances and see them all blank, since the lists are showing instances only in the currently selected project (the install namespace) and not across all namespaces the operator is available in.
It is likely that making use of the new Operator resource will improve this experience (CONSOLE-2240,) though that may still be some releases away. it should be considered if it's worth a "short term" fix in the meantime.
Note: The informational alert was not implemented. It was decided that since "All namespaces" is displayed in the radio button, the alert was not needed.
4.11 MVP Requirements
Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):
Questions to be addressed:
As a deployer, I want to be able to:
so that I can achieve
Currently the Assisted Service generates the credentials by running the ignition generation step of the oepnshift-installer. This is why the credentials are only retrievable from the REST API towards the end of the installation.
In the BILLI usage, which takes down assisted service before the installation is complete there is no obvious point at which to alert the user that they should retrieve the credentials. This means that we either need to:
This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.
Customers are asking for improvements to the upgrade experience (both over-the-air and disconnected). This is a feature tracking epics required to get that work done.
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->
Goal
Add the ability to choose between a full cluster upgrade (which exists today) or control plane upgrade (which will pause all worker pools) in the console.
Background
Currently in the console, users only have the ability to complete a full cluster upgrade. For many customers, upgrades take longer than what their maintenance window allows. Users need the ability to upgrade the control plane independently of the other worker nodes.
Ex. Upgrades of huge clusters may take too long so admins may do the control plane this weekend, worker-pool-A next weekend, worker-pool-B the weekend after, etc. It is all at a pool level, they will not be able to choose specific hosts.
Requirements
Design deliverables:
Goal
Improve the UX on the machine config pool page to reflect the new enhancements on the cluster settings that allows users to select the ability to update the control plane only.
Background
Currently in the console, users only have the ability to complete a full cluster upgrade. For many customers, upgrades take longer than what their maintenance window allows. Users need the ability to upgrade the control plane independently of the other worker nodes.
Ex. Upgrades of huge clusters may take too long so admins may do the control plane this weekend, worker-pool-A next weekend, worker-pool-B the weekend after, etc. It is all at a pool level, they will not be able to choose specific hosts.
Requirements
Design deliverables:
Enable sharing ConfigMap and Secret across namespaces
Requirement | Notes | isMvp? |
---|---|---|
Secrets and ConfigMaps can get shared across namespaces | YES |
NA
NA
Consumption of RHEL entitlements has been a challenge on OCP 4 since it moved to a cluster-based entitlement model compared to the node-based (RHEL subscription manager) entitlement mode. In order to provide a sufficiently similar experience to OCP 3, the entitlement certificates that are made available on the cluster (OCPBU-93) should be shared across namespaces in order to prevent the need for cluster admin to copy these entitlements in each namespace which leads to additional operational challenges for updating and refreshing them.
Questions to be addressed:
* What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
* Does this feature have doc impact?
* New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
* If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
* What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
* How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
* What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
* Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
* What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->
As an OpenShift engineer,
I want to initialize a validating admission webhook for the shared resource CSI driver
So that I can eventually require readOnly: true to be set on all pods that use the Shared Resource CSI Driver
None.
None.
None.
This is a prerequisite for implementing the validating admission webhook.
We need to have ART build the container image downstream so that we can add the correct image references for the CVO.
If we reference images in the CVO manifests which do not have downstream counterparts, we break the downstream build for the payload.
CI is capable of producing multiple images for a GitHub repository. For example, github.com/openshift/oc produces 4-5 images with various capabilities.
We did similar work in BUILD-234 - some of these steps are not required.
See also:
Tasks:
As a developer using SharedSecrets and ConfigMaps
I want to ensure all pods set readOnly; true on admission
So that I don't have pods stuck in the "Pending" state because of a bad volume mount
QE will need to verify the new Pod Admission behavior
Docs will need to ensure that readOnly: true is required and must be set to true.
None.
QE testing/verification of the feature - require readOnly to be true
Actions:
1. Create smoke test and submit to GitHub
2. Run script to integrate smoke test with Polarion
As an OpenShift engineer
I want the shared resource CSI Driver webhook to be installed with the cluster storage operator
So that the webhook is deployed when the CSI driver is deployed
None - no new functional capabilities will be added
None - we can verify in CI that we are deploying the webhook correctly.
None - no new functional capabilities will be added
The scope of this story is to just deploy the "hello world" webhook with the Cluster Storage Operator.
Adding the live ValidatingWebhook configuration and service will be done in a separate story.
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Feature --->
<--- Remove the descriptive text as appropriate --->
Problem
Requirement | Notes | isMvp? |
---|---|---|
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation | This is a requirement for ALL features. | YES |
Release Technical Enablement | Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. | YES |
This Section:
This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.
Questions to be addressed:
Running the OPCT with the latest version (v0.1.0) on OCP 4.11.0, the openshift-tests is reporting an incorrect counter for the "total" field.
In the example below, after the 1127th test, the total follows the same counter of executed. I also would assume that the total is incorrect before that point as the test continues the execution increases both counters.
openshift-tests output format: [failed/executed/total]
started: (0/1126/1127) "[sig-storage] PersistentVolumes-expansion loopback local block volume should support online expansion on node [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" passed: (38s) 2022-08-09T17:12:21 "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: nfs] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (default fs)] provisioning should provision storage with mount options [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" started: (0/1127/1127) "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: local][LocalVolumeType: tmpfs] [Testpattern: Generic Ephemeral-volume (block volmode) (late-binding)] ephemeral should support two pods which have the same volume definition [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" passed: (6.6s) 2022-08-09T17:12:21 "[sig-storage] Downward API volume should provide container's memory request [NodeConformance] [Conformance] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal] [Suite:k8s]" started: (0/1128/1128) "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: cinder] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (immediate binding)] topology should fail to schedule a pod which has topologies that conflict with AllowedTopologies [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" skip [k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.24.0/test/e2e/storage/framework/testsuite.go:116]: Driver local doesn't support GenericEphemeralVolume -- skipping Ginkgo exit error 3: exit with code 3 skipped: (400ms) 2022-08-09T17:12:21 "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: local][LocalVolumeType: tmpfs] [Testpattern: Generic Ephemeral-volume (block volmode) (late-binding)] ephemeral should support two pods which have the same volume definition [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" started: (0/1129/1129) "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: emptydir] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (default fs)] capacity provides storage capacity information [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]"
OPCT output format [executed/total (failed failures)]
Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:13 -03> Global Status: running JOB_NAME | STATUS | RESULTS | PROGRESS | MESSAGE openshift-conformance-validated | running | | 1112/1127 (0 failures) | status=running openshift-kube-conformance | complete | | 352/352 (0 failures) | waiting for post-processor... Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:23 -03> Global Status: running JOB_NAME | STATUS | RESULTS | PROGRESS | MESSAGE openshift-conformance-validated | running | | 1120/1127 (0 failures) | status=running openshift-kube-conformance | complete | | 352/352 (0 failures) | waiting for post-processor... Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:33 -03> Global Status: running JOB_NAME | STATUS | RESULTS | PROGRESS | MESSAGE openshift-conformance-validated | running | | 1139/1139 (0 failures) | status=running openshift-kube-conformance | complete | | 352/352 (0 failures) | waiting for post-processor... Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:43 -03> Global Status: running JOB_NAME | STATUS | RESULTS | PROGRESS | MESSAGE openshift-conformance-validated | running | | 1185/1185 (0 failures) | status=running openshift-kube-conformance | complete | | 352/352 (0 failures) | waiting for post-processor... Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:53 -03> Global Status: running JOB_NAME | STATUS | RESULTS | PROGRESS | MESSAGE openshift-conformance-validated | running | | 1188/1188 (0 failures) | status=running openshift-kube-conformance | complete | | 352/352 (0 failures) | waiting for post-processor...
This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-2 revealed that, in prinicipal, Pod Security Admission is possible to integrate into OpenShift while retaining SCC functionality.
This epic is about the concrete steps to enable Pod Security Admission by default in OpenShift
Enhancement - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1010
dns-operator must comply to restricted pod security level. The current audit warning is:
{ "objectRef": "openshift-dns-operator/deployments/dns-operator", "pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-violations": "would violate PodSecurity \"restricted:latest\": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unre stricted capabilities (containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=[\"ALL\"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot=tr ue), seccompProfile (pod or containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to \"RuntimeDefault\" or \"Localhost\")" }ingress-operator must comply to pod security. The current audit warning is:
{ "objectRef": "openshift-ingress-operator/deployments/ingress-operator", "pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-violations": "would violate PodSecurity \"restricted:latest\": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unrestricted capabilities (containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=[\"ALL\"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.run AsNonRoot=true), seccompProfile (pod or containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to \"RuntimeDefault\" or \"Localhost\")" }
HyperShift provisions OpenShift clusters with externally managed control-planes. It follows a slightly different process for provisioning clusters. For example, HyperShift uses cluster API as a backend and moves all the machine management bits to the management cluster.
showing machine management/cluster auto-scaling tabs in the console is likely to confuse users and cause unnecessary side effects.
See Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#
It's based on the SERVER_FLAG controlPlaneTopology being set to External is really the driving factor here; this can be done in one of two ways:
To test work related to cluster upgrade process, use a 4.10.3 cluster set on the candidate-4.10 upgrade channel using 4.11 frontend code.
If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml co the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need surface a message that the control plane is externally managed and add following changes:
In general, anything that changes a cluster version should be read only.
Check section 02 for more info: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#
If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml to the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need to suspend these notifications:
For these we will need to check `ControlPlaneTopology`, if it's set to 'External' and also check if the user can edit cluster version(either by creating a hook or an RBAC call, eg. `canEditClusterVersion`)
Check section 05 for more info: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#
If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml to the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need to suspend kubeadmin notifier, from the global notifications, since it contain link for updating the cluster OAuth configuration (see attachment).
If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml co the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need to remove the ability to “Add identity providers” under “Set up your Cluster”. In addition to the getting started card, we should remove the ability to update a cluster on the details card when applicable (anything that changes a cluster version should be read only).
Summary of changes to the overview page:
Check section 03 for more info: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#
Based on Cesar's comment we should be removing the `Control Plane` section, if the infrastructure.status.controlplanetopology being "External".
PatternFly Dark Theme Handbook: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mRYEfUoOjTsSt7hiqjbeplqhfo3_rVDO0QqMj2p67pw/edit
Admin Console -> Workloads & Pods
Dev Console -> Gotcha pages: Observe Dashboard and Metrics, Add, Pipelines: builder, list, log, and run
As a developer, I want to be able to scope the changes needed to enable dark mode for the admin console. As such, I need to investigate how much of the console will display dark mode using PF variables and also define a list of gotcha pages/components which will need special casing above and beyond PF variable settings.
Acceptance criteria:
As a developer, I want to be able to fix remaining issues from the spreadsheet of issues generated after the initial pass and spike of adding dark theme to the console.. As such, I need to make sure to either complete all remaining issues for the spreadsheet, or, create a bug or future story for any remaining issues in these two documents.
Acceptance criteria:
An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.
The Cluster Dashboard Details Card Protractor integration test was failing at high rate, and despite multiple attempts to fix, was never fully resolved, so it was disabled as a way to fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068594. Migrating this entire file to Cypress should give us better debugging capability, which is what was done to fix a similarly problematic project dashboard Protractor test.
Currently, you need to navigate to
Cluster Settings ->
Global configuration ->
Console (operator) config ->
Console plugins
to see and managed plugins. This takes a lot of clicks and is not discoverable. We should look at surfacing plugin details where they're easier to find – perhaps on the Cluster Settings page – or at least provide a more convenient link somewhere in the UI.
AC: Add the Dynamic Plugins section to the Status Card in the overview that will contain:
We have a Timestamp component for consistent display of dates and times that we should expose through the SDK. We might also consider a hook that formats dates and times for places were you don't want or cant use the component, eg. times on a chart.
This will become important when we add a user preference for dates so that plugins show consistent dates and times as console. If I set my user preference to UTC dates, console should show UTC dates everywhere.
AC:
Currently, enabled plugins can fail to load for a variety of reasons. For instance, plugins don't load if the plugin name in the manifest doesn't match the ConsolePlugin name or the plugin has an invalid codeRef. There is no indication in the UI that something has gone wrong. We should explore ways to report this problem in the UI to cluster admins. Depending on the nature of the issue, an admin might be able to resolve the issue or at least report a bug against the plugin.
The message about failing could appear in the notification drawer and/or console plugins tab on the operator config. We could also explore creating an alert if a plugin is failing.
AC:
In the 4.11 release, a console.openshift.io/default-i18next-namespace annotation is being introduced. The annotation indicates whether the ConsolePlugin contains localization resources. If the annotation is set to "true", the localization resources from the i18n namespace named after the dynamic plugin (e.g. plugin__kubevirt), are loaded. If the annotation is set to any other value or is missing on the ConsolePlugin resource, localization resources are not loaded.
In case these resources are not present in the dynamic plugin, the initial console load will be slowed down. For more info check BZ#2015654
AC:
Follow up of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3159
We need to provide a base for running integration tests using the dynamic plugins. The tests should initially
Once the basic framework is in place, we can update the demo plugin and add new integration tests when we add new extension points.
https://github.com/openshift/console/tree/master/frontend/dynamic-demo-plugin
https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/console/dynamic-plugins.md
https://github.com/openshift/console/tree/master/frontend/packages/console-plugin-sdk
Goal
Background
RFE: for 4.10, Cincinnati and the cluster-version operator are adding conditional updates (a.k.a. targeted edge blocking): https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-267
High-level plans in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#update-client-support-for-the-enhanced-schema
Example of what the oc adm upgrade UX will be in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#cluster-administrator.
The oc implementation landed via https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/961.
Design
See design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nja4whdsI5dKmQNS_rXyN8IGtRXDJ8gXuU_eSxBLMIY/edit#
See marvel: https://marvelapp.com/prototype/h3ehaa4/screen/86077932
Update the cluster settings page to inform the user when the latest available update is supported but not recommended. Add an informational popover to the latest version in update path visualization.
The "Update Version" modal on the cluster settings page should be updated to give users information about recommended, not recommended, and blocked update versions.
Story: As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.
Background: The image registry currently uses affinity/anti-affinity rules to spread registry pods across different hosts. However this might cause situations in which all pods end up on hosts of a single zone, leading to a long recovery time of the registry if that zone is lost entirely. However due to problems in the past with the preferred setting of anti-affinity rule adherence the configuration was forced instead with required and the rules became constraints. With zones as constraints the internal registry would not have deployed anymore in environments with a single zone, e.g. internal CI environment. Pod topology constraints is a new API that is supported in OCP which can also relax constraints in case they cannot be satisfied. Details here: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.7/nodes/scheduling/nodes-scheduler-pod-topology-spread-constraints.html
Acceptance criteria:
Open Questions:
As an OpenShift administrator
I want to provide the registry operator with a custom certificate authority for S3 storage
so that I can use a third-party S3 storage provider.
Remove Jenkins from the OCP Payload.
See epic linking - need alternative non payload image available to provide relatively seamless migration
Also, the EP for this is approved and merged at https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/builds/remove-jenkins-payload.md
PARTIAL ANSWER ^^: confirmed with Ben Parees in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C014MHHKUSF/p1646683621293839 that EP merging is currently sufficient OCP "technical leadership" approval.
assuming none
As maintainers of the OpenShift jenkins component, we need run Jenkins CI for PR testing against openshift/jenkins, openshift/jenkins-sync-plugin, openshift/jenkins-client-plugin, openshift/jenkins-openshift-login-plugin, using images built in the CI pipeline but not injected into CI test clusters via sample operator overriding the jenkins sample imagestream with the jenkins payload image.
As maintainers of the OpenShift Jenkins component, we need Jenkins periodics for the client and sync plugins to run against the latest non payload, CPaas image, promoted to CI's image locations on quay.io, for the current release in development.
As maintainers of the OpenShift Jenkins component, we need Jenkins related tests outside of very basic Jenkins Pipieline Strategy Build Config verification, removed from openshift-tests in OpenShift Origin, using a non-payload, CPaas image pertinent to the branch in question.
High Level, we ideally want to vet the new CPaas image via CI and periodics BEFORE we start changing the samples operator so that it does not manipulate the jenkins imagestream (our tests will override the samples operator override)
NONE ... QE should wait until JNKS-254
NONE
NONE
Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated
Possible staging
1) before CPaas is available, we can validate images generated by PRs to openshift/jenkins, openshift/jenkins-sync-plugin, openshift/jenkins-client-plugin by taking the image built by the image (where the info needed to get the right image from the CI registry is in the IMAGE_FORMAT env var) and then doing an `oc tag --source=docker <PR image ref> openshift/jenkins:2` to replace the use of the payload image in the jenkins imagestream in the openshift namespace with the PRs image
2) insert 1) in https://github.com/openshift/release/blob/master/ci-operator/step-registry/jenkins/sync-plugin/e2e/jenkins-sync-plugin-e2e-commands.sh and https://github.com/openshift/release/blob/master/ci-operator/step-registry/jenkins/client-plugin/tests/jenkins-client-plugin-tests-commands.sh where you test for IMAGE_FORMAT being set
3) or instead of 2) you update the Makefiles for the plugins to call a script that does the same sort of thing, see what is in IMAGE_FORMAT, and if it has something, do the `oc tag`
https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/26979 is a prototype of how to stick the image built from a PR and conceivably the periodics to get the image built from it and tag it into the jenkins imagestream in the openshift namespace in the test cluster
After installing or upgrading to the latest OCP version, the existing OpenShift route to the prometheus-k8s service is updated to be a path-based route to '/api/v1'.
DoD:
Following up on https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1320, we added three new CLI flags to Prometheus to apply different limits on the samples' labels. These new flags are available starting from Prometheus v2.27.0, which will most likely be shipped in OpenShift 4.9.
The limits that we want to look into for OCP are the following ones:
# Per-scrape limit on number of labels that will be accepted for a sample. If # more than this number of labels are present post metric-relabeling, the # entire scrape will be treated as failed. 0 means no limit. [ label_limit: <int> | default = 0 ] # Per-scrape limit on length of labels name that will be accepted for a sample. # If a label name is longer than this number post metric-relabeling, the entire # scrape will be treated as failed. 0 means no limit. [ label_name_length_limit: <int> | default = 0 ] # Per-scrape limit on length of labels value that will be accepted for a sample. # If a label value is longer than this number post metric-relabeling, the # entire scrape will be treated as failed. 0 means no limit. [ label_value_length_limit: <int> | default = 0 ]
We could benefit from them by setting relatively high values that could only induce unbound cardinality and thus reject the targets completely if they happened to breach our constrainst.
DoD:
When users configure CMO to interact with systems outside of an OpenShift cluster, we want to provide an easy way to add the cluster ID to the data send.
Technically this can be achieved today, by adding an identifying label to the remote_write configuration for a given cluster. The operator adding the remote_write integration needs to take care that the label is unique over the managed fleet of clusters. This however adds management complexity. Any given cluster already has a pseudo-unique datum, that can be used for this purpose.
Expose a flag in the CMO configuration, that is false by default (keeps backward compatibility) and when set to true will add the _id label to a remote_write configuration. More specifically it will be added to the top of a remote_write relabel_config list via the replace action. This will add the label as expect, but additionally a user could alter this label in a later relabel config to suit any specific requirements (say rename the label or add additional information to the value).
The location of this flag is the remote_write Spec, so this can be set for individual remote_write configurations.
We currently use a sample app to e2e test remote write in CMO.
In order to test the addition of the cluster_id relabel config, we need to confirm that the metrics send actually have the expected label.
For this test we should use Prometheus as the remote_write target. This allows us to query the metrics send via remote write and confirm they have the expected label.
Add an optional boolean flag to CMOs definition of RemoteWriteSpec that if true adds an entry in the specs WriteRelabelConfigs list.
I went with adding the relabel config to all user-supplied remote_write configurations. This path has no risk for backwards compatibility (unless users use the {}tmp_openshift_cluster_id{} label, seems unlikely) and reduces overall complexity, as well as documentation complexity.
The entry should look like what is already added to the telemetry remote write config and it should be added as the first entry in the list, before any user supplied relabel configs.
The potential target ServiceMonitors are:
As a user, I want to understand which service bindings connected a service to a component successfully or not. Currently it's really difficult to understand and needs inspection into each ServiceBinding resource (yaml).
See also https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OzE74z2RGO5LPjtDoJeUgYBQXBSVmD5tCC7xfJotE00/edit
As a user, I want the topology view to be less cluttered as I doom out showing only information that I can discern and still be able to get a feel for the status of my project.
This epic is mainly focused on the 4.10 Release QE activities
1. Identify the scenarios for automation
2. Segregate the test Scenarios into smoke, Regression and other user stories
a. Update the https://docs.jboss.org/display/ODC/Automation+Status+Report
3. Align with layered operator teams for updating scripts
3. Work closely with dev team for epic automation
4. Create the automation scripts using cypress
5. Implement CI for nightly builds
6. Execute scripts on sprint basis
To the track the QE progress at one place in 4.10 Release Confluence page
Acceptance criteria:
This epic covers a number of customer requests(RFEs) as well as increases usability.
Customer satisfaction as well as improved usability.
None
As a user, I want to use a form to create Deployments
Edit deployment form ODC-5007
As a user, I should be able to switch between the form and yaml editor while creating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CR.
Form component https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11227
Currently we are only able to get limited telemetry from the Dev Sandbox, but not from any of our managed clusters or on prem clusters.
In order to improve properly analyze usage and the user experience, we need to be able to gather as much data as possible.
// JS type
telemetry?: Record<string, string>
./bin/bridge --telemetry SEGMENT_API_KEY=a-key-123-xzy ./bin/bridge --telemetry CONSOLE_LOG=debug
Goal:
Enhance oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) with heterogeneous architecture support
tl;dr
oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) would be enhanced to optionally allow the creation of manifest list release payloads. The manifest list flow would be triggered whenever the CVO image in an imagestream was a manifest list. If the CVO image is a standard manifest, the generated release payload will also be a manifest. If the CVO image is a manifest list, the generated release payload would be a manifest list (containing a manifest for each arch possessed by the CVO manifest list).
In either case, oc adm release new would permit non-CVO component images to be manifest or manifest lists and pass them through directly to the resultant release manifest(s).
If a manifest list release payload is generated, each architecture specific release payload manifest will reference the same pullspecs provided in the input imagestream.
More details in Option 1 of https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOlPrmPhuGboZbLZWApXszxuJ1eish92NlOeb03XEdE/edit#heading=h.eldc1ppinjjh
This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled
I asked Zvonko Kaiser and he seemed open to it. I need to confirm with Shiva Merla
Rename Provider to Infrastructure Provider
Add GPU Provider
https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVOeUB2B4=/?moveToWidget=3458764514332229879&cot=14
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->
As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges
No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.
We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.
This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?
This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled
Description of problem:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104275
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-858. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
In OCP 4.9, the package-server-manager was introduced to manage the packageserver CSV. However, when OCP 4.8 in upgraded to 4.9, the packageserver stays stuck in v0.17.0, which is the version in OCP 4.8, and v0.18.3 does not roll out, which is the version in OCP 4.9
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install OCP 4.8 2. Upgrade to OCP 4.9 $ oc get clusterversion NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.8.0-0.nightly-2022-08-31-160214 True True 50m Working towards 4.9.47: 619 of 738 done (83% complete) $ oc get clusterversion NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.9.47 True False 4m26s Cluster version is 4.9.47
Actual results:
Check packageserver CSV. It's in v0.17.0 $ oc get csv NAME DISPLAY VERSION REPLACES PHASE packageserver Package Server 0.17.0 Succeeded
Expected results:
packageserver CSV is at 0.18.3
Additional info:
packageserver CSV version in 4.8: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.8/manifests/0000_50_olm_15-packageserver.clusterserviceversion.yaml#L12 packageserver CSV version in 4.9: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.9/pkg/manifests/csv.yaml#L8
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-855. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
When setting the allowedregistries like the example below, the openshift-samples operator is degraded: oc get image.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml apiVersion: config.openshift.io/v1 kind: Image metadata: annotations: release.openshift.io/create-only: "true" creationTimestamp: "2020-12-16T15:48:20Z" generation: 2 name: cluster resourceVersion: "422284920" uid: d406d5a0-c452-4a84-b6b3-763abb51d7a5 spec: additionalTrustedCA: name: registry-ca allowedRegistriesForImport: - domainName: quay.io insecure: false - domainName: registry.redhat.io insecure: false - domainName: registry.access.redhat.com insecure: false - domainName: registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index insecure: true - domainName: registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-marketplace-index insecure: true - domainName: registry.redhat.io/redhat/certified-operator-index insecure: true - domainName: registry.redhat.io/redhat/community-operator-index insecure: true registrySources: allowedRegistries: - quay.io - registry.redhat.io - registry.rijksapps.nl - registry.access.redhat.com - registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index - registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-marketplace-index - registry.redhat.io/redhat/certified-operator-index - registry.redhat.io/redhat/community-operator-index oc get co NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING DEGRADED SINCE MESSAGE authentication 4.10.21 True False False 5d13h baremetal 4.10.21 True False False 450d cloud-controller-manager 4.10.21 True False False 94d cloud-credential 4.10.21 True False False 624d cluster-autoscaler 4.10.21 True False False 624d config-operator 4.10.21 True False False 624d console 4.10.21 True False False 42d csi-snapshot-controller 4.10.21 True False False 31d dns 4.10.21 True False False 217d etcd 4.10.21 True False False 624d image-registry 4.10.21 True False False 94d ingress 4.10.21 True False False 94d insights 4.10.21 True False False 104s kube-apiserver 4.10.21 True False False 624d kube-controller-manager 4.10.21 True False False 624d kube-scheduler 4.10.21 True False False 624d kube-storage-version-migrator 4.10.21 True False False 31d machine-api 4.10.21 True False False 624d machine-approver 4.10.21 True False False 624d machine-config 4.10.21 True False False 17d marketplace 4.10.21 True False False 258d monitoring 4.10.21 True False False 161d network 4.10.21 True False False 624d node-tuning 4.10.21 True False False 31d openshift-apiserver 4.10.21 True False False 42d openshift-controller-manager 4.10.21 True False False 22d openshift-samples 4.10.21 True True True 31d Samples installation in error at 4.10.21: &errors.errorString{s:"global openshift image configuration prevents the creation of imagestreams using the registry "} operator-lifecycle-manager 4.10.21 True False False 624d operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog 4.10.21 True False False 624d operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver 4.10.21 True False False 31d service-ca 4.10.21 True False False 624d storage 4.10.21 True False False 113d After applying the fix as described here( https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6547281 ) it is resolved: oc patch configs.samples.operator.openshift.io cluster --type merge --patch '{"spec": {"samplesRegistry": "registry.redhat.io"}}' But according the the BZ this should be fixed in 4.10.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027745 but the issue is still occur in our 4.10.21 cluster: oc get clusterversion NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.10.21 True False 31d Error while reconciling 4.10.21: the cluster operator openshift-samples is degraded
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Description of problem:
For some reason, the LSP of a pod is not properly added to the port group where the ACL of a NetworkPolicy is applied. This results on the networkpolicy not being applied to the pod and communication not possible.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10
How reproducible:
Always with a concrete pod at customer environment.
Steps to Reproduce:
(not known exactly yet)
Actual results:
LSP not in port group. ACL not applied. Netpol not in effect.
Expected results:
LSP in port group. ACL applied. Netpol in effect.
Additional info:
Details in private comments, as they involve sensitive data. Deleting the pod does nothing, but it is possible that this has something to do with the pod being recreated with the same name (although the LSPs UUIDs are different in each incarnation).
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1765. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
If a customer creates a machine with a networks section like this networks: - filter: {} noAllowedAddressPairs: false subnets: - filter: {} uuid: primary-subnet-uuid - filter: {} noAllowedAddressPairs: true subnets: - filter: {} uuid: other-subnet-uuid primarySubnet: primary-subnet-uuid Then all the ports are created without the allowed address pairs. Doing some research in the source code, I have found that: - For each entry on the networks: section, networks are filtered as per its filter: section[1] - Then, if the subnets: section of the network entry is not empty, for each of the network IDs found above[2], 2 things are done that are relevant for this situatoin: - The net ID is saved on a netsWithoutAllowedAddressPairs[3]. That map is later checked while creating any port[4]. - For each subnet entry that matches the network ID, a port is created[5]. So, the problematic behavior happens due to the following: - Both entries in the networks array have empty filters. This means that both entries selected all the neutron networks. - This configuration results in one port per subnet as expected because, in the later traversal of the subnets array of each entry[5], it is filtering by subnet and creating a single port as expected. - However, the entry with "noAllowedAddressPairs: true" is selecting all the neutron networks, so it adds all of them to the netsWithoutAllowedAddressPairs map[3], regardless of the subnets filtering. - As all the networks are in noAllowedAddressPairs: true array, all the ports created for the VM have their allowed address pairs removed[4]. Why do we consider this behavior undesired? I understand that, if we create a port for a network that has no allowed pairs, we create all the other ports in the same networks without the pairs. However, it is surprising that a port in a network is removed the allowed address pairs due to a setting in an entry that yielded no port on that network. In other words, one would expect that the same subnet filtering that happens on each network entry in what regards yielding ports for the VM would also work for the noAllowedPairs parameter.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.30
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a machineset like in the description 2. 3.
Actual results:
All ports have no address pairs
Expected results:
Only the port on the secondary subnet has no address pairs.
Additional info:
A simple workaround would be to just fill the filter so that a single network is selected for each network entry. References: [1] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L576 [2] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L580 [3] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L581-L583 [4] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L658-L660 [5] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L610-L625
Description of problem: Issue described in following issue: https://github.com/openshift/multus-admission-controller/issues/40
Fixed in: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1515
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OCP 4.10
Official Red Hat tracker. Issue has been merged already.
In order to delete the correct GCP cloud resources, the "--credentials-requests-dir" parameter must be passed to "ccoctl gcp delete". This was fixed for 4.12 as part of https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/489 but must be backported for previous releases. See https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/489#issuecomment-1248733205 for discussion regarding this bug.
To reproduce, create GCP infrastructure with a name parameter that is a subset of another set of GCP infrastructure's name parameter. I will "ccoctl gcp create all" with "name=abutcher-gcp" and "name=abutcher-gcp1".
$ ./ccoctl gcp create-all \ --name=abutcher-gcp \ --region=us-central1 \ --project=openshift-hive-dev \ --credentials-requests-dir=./credrequests $ ./ccoctl gcp create-all \ --name=abutcher-gcp1 \ --region=us-central1 \ --project=openshift-hive-dev \ --credentials-requests-dir=./credrequests
Running "ccoctl gcp delete --name=abutcher-gcp" will result in GCP infrastructure for both "abutcher-gcp" and "abutcher-gcp1" being deleted.
$ ./ccoctl gcp delete --name abutcher-gcp --project openshift-hive-dev 2022/10/24 11:30:06 Credentials loaded from file "/home/abutcher/.gcp/osServiceAccount.json" 2022/10/24 11:30:06 Deleted object .well-known/openid-configuration from bucket abutcher-gcp-oidc 2022/10/24 11:30:07 Deleted object keys.json from bucket abutcher-gcp-oidc 2022/10/24 11:30:07 OIDC bucket abutcher-gcp-oidc deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:09 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-image-registry-gcs deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:10 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-gcp-ccm deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:11 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-cloud-network-config-controller-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:12 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-machine-api-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:13 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-ingress-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:15 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:16 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-ingress-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:17 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-image-registry-gcs deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:19 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-cloud-credential-operator-gcp-ro-creds deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:20 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:21 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-gcp-ccm deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:22 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-cloud-credential-operator-gcp-ro-creds deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:24 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-machine-api-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:25 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-cloud-network-config-controller-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:25 Workload identity pool abutcher-gcp deleted
Description of problem:
The alertmanager pod is stuck on OCP 4.11 with OVN in container Creating State From oc describe alertmanager pod: ... Events: Type Reason Age From Message ---- ------ ---- ---- ------- Warning FailedCreatePodSandBox 16s (x459 over 17h) kubelet (combined from similar events): Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0_openshift-storage_3a55ed54-4eaa-4f65-8a10-e5d21fad1ebc_0(88575547dc0b210307b89dd2bb8e379ece0962b607ac2707a1c2cf630b1aaa78): error adding pod openshift-storage_alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): [openshift-storage/alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0/3a55ed54-4eaa-4f65-8a10-e5d21fad1ebc:ovn-kubernetes]: error adding container to network "ovn-kubernetes": CNI request failed with status 400: '[openshift-storage/alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0 88575547dc0b210307b89dd2bb8e379ece0962b607ac2707a1c2cf630b1aaa78] [openshift
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP 4.11 with OVN
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Terminate the node on which alertmanager pod is running 2. pod will get stuck in container Creating state 3.
Actual results:
AlertManager pod is stuck in container Creating state
Expected results:
Alertmanager pod is ready
Additional info:
The workaround would be to terminate the alertmanager pod
Description of problem:
In a 4.11 cluster with only openshift-samples enabled, the 4.12 introduced optional COs console and insights are installed. While upgrading to 4.12, CVO considers them to be disabled explicitly and skips reconciling them. So these COs are not upgraded to 4.12. Installed COs cannot be disabled, so CVO is supposed to implicitly enable them. $ oc get clusterversion -oyaml { "apiVersion": "config.openshift.io/v1", "kind": "ClusterVersion", "metadata": { "creationTimestamp": "2022-09-30T05:02:31Z", "generation": 3, "name": "version", "resourceVersion": "134808", "uid": "bd95473f-ffda-402d-8fe3-74f852a9d6eb" }, "spec": { "capabilities": { "additionalEnabledCapabilities": [ "openshift-samples" ], "baselineCapabilitySet": "None" }, "channel": "stable-4.11", "clusterID": "8eda5167-a730-4b39-be1d-214a80506d34", "desiredUpdate": { "force": true, "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc", "version": "" } }, "status": { "availableUpdates": null, "capabilities": { "enabledCapabilities": [ "openshift-samples" ], "knownCapabilities": [ "Console", "Insights", "Storage", "baremetal", "marketplace", "openshift-samples" ] }, "conditions": [ { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z", "message": "Unable to retrieve available updates: currently reconciling cluster version 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 not found in the \"stable-4.11\" channel", "reason": "VersionNotFound", "status": "False", "type": "RetrievedUpdates" }, { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z", "message": "Capabilities match configured spec", "reason": "AsExpected", "status": "False", "type": "ImplicitlyEnabledCapabilities" }, { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z", "message": "Payload loaded version=\"4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419\" image=\"registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc\" architecture=\"amd64\"", "reason": "PayloadLoaded", "status": "True", "type": "ReleaseAccepted" }, { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:23:18Z", "message": "Done applying 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419", "status": "True", "type": "Available" }, { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T07:05:42Z", "status": "False", "type": "Failing" }, { "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T07:41:53Z", "message": "Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419", "status": "False", "type": "Progressing" } ], "desired": { "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc", "version": "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419" }, "history": [ { "completionTime": "2022-09-30T07:41:53Z", "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc", "startedTime": "2022-09-30T06:42:01Z", "state": "Completed", "verified": false, "version": "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419" }, { "completionTime": "2022-09-30T05:23:18Z", "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:5a6f6d1bf5c752c75d7554aa927c06b5ea0880b51909e83387ee4d3bca424631", "startedTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z", "state": "Completed", "verified": false, "version": "4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451" } ], "observedGeneration": 3, "versionHash": "CSCJ2fxM_2o=" } } $ oc get co NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING DEGRADED SINCE MESSAGE authentication 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 93m cloud-controller-manager 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h56m cloud-credential 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h59m cluster-autoscaler 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h53m config-operator 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h54m console 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451 True False False 3h45m control-plane-machine-set 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 117m csi-snapshot-controller 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h54m dns 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h53m etcd 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h52m image-registry 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h46m ingress 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 151m insights 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451 True False False 3h48m kube-apiserver 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h50m kube-controller-manager 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h51m kube-scheduler 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h51m kube-storage-version-migrator 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 91m machine-api 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h50m machine-approver 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h54m machine-config 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h52m monitoring 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h44m network 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h55m node-tuning 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 113m openshift-apiserver 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h48m openshift-controller-manager 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 113m openshift-samples 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 116m operator-lifecycle-manager 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h54m operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h54m operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h48m service-ca 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h54m storage 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 True False False 3h54m
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install a 4.11 cluster with only openshift-samples enabled 2. Upgrade to 4.12 3.
Actual results:
The 4.12 introduced optional CO console and insights are not upgraded to 4.12
Expected results:
All the installed COs get upgraded
Additional info:
Discovered in the must gather kubelet_service.log from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade/1586093220087992320
It appears the guard pod names are too long, and being truncated down to where they will collide with those from the other masters.
From kubelet logs in this run:
❯ grep openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste kubelet_service.log Oct 28 23:58:55.693391 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1 kubenswrapper[1657]: E1028 23:58:55.693346 1657 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste" Oct 28 23:59:03.735726 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0 kubenswrapper[1670]: E1028 23:59:03.735671 1670 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste" Oct 28 23:59:11.168082 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2 kubenswrapper[1667]: E1028 23:59:11.168041 1667 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
This also looks to be happening for openshift-kube-scheduler-guard, kube-controller-manager-guard, possibly others.
Looks like they should be truncated further to make room for random suffixes in https://github.com/openshift/library-go/blame/bd9b0e19121022561dcd1d9823407cd58b2265d0/pkg/operator/staticpod/controller/guard/guard_controller.go#L97-L98
Unsure of the implications here, it looks a little scary.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1226. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
We added server groups for control plane and computes as part of OSASINFRA-2570, except for UPI that only creates server group for the control plane.
We need to update the UPI scripts to create server group for computes to be consistent with IPI and have the instruction at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-machineset-osp.html work out of the box in case customers want to create MachineSets on their UPI clusters.
Related to OCPCLOUD-1135.
Description of problem:
prometheus-k8s-0 ends in CrashLoopBackOff with evel=error err="opening storage failed: /prometheus/chunks_head/000002: invalid magic number 0" on SNO after hard reboot tests
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.6
How reproducible:
Not always, after ~10 attempts
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy SNO with Telco DU profile applied 2. Hard reboot node via out of band interface 3. oc -n openshift-monitoring get pods prometheus-k8s-0
Actual results:
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE prometheus-k8s-0 5/6 CrashLoopBackOff 125 (4m57s ago) 5h28m
Expected results:
Running
Additional info:
Attaching must-gather. The pod recovers successfully after deleting/re-creating. [kni@registry.kni-qe-0 ~]$ oc -n openshift-monitoring logs prometheus-k8s-0 ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:552 level=info msg="Starting Prometheus Server" mode=server version="(version=2.36.2, branch=rhaos-4.11-rhel-8, revision=0d81ba04ce410df37ca2c0b1ec619e1bc02e19ef)" ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:557 level=info build_context="(go=go1.18.4, user=root@371541f17026, date=20220916-14:15:37)" ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:558 level=info host_details="(Linux 4.18.0-372.26.1.rt7.183.el8_6.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_RT Sat Aug 27 22:04:33 EDT 2022 x86_64 prometheus-k8s-0 (none))" ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:559 level=info fd_limits="(soft=1048576, hard=1048576)" ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:560 level=info vm_limits="(soft=unlimited, hard=unlimited)" ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.921Z caller=web.go:553 level=info component=web msg="Start listening for connections" address=127.0.0.1:9090 ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.922Z caller=main.go:989 level=info msg="Starting TSDB ..." ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.924Z caller=tls_config.go:231 level=info component=web msg="TLS is disabled." http2=false ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:848 level=info msg="Stopping scrape discovery manager..." ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:862 level=info msg="Stopping notify discovery manager..." ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=manager.go:951 level=info component="rule manager" msg="Stopping rule manager..." ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=manager.go:961 level=info component="rule manager" msg="Rule manager stopped" ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:899 level=info msg="Stopping scrape manager..." ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:858 level=info msg="Notify discovery manager stopped" ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:891 level=info msg="Scrape manager stopped" ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=notifier.go:599 level=info component=notifier msg="Stopping notification manager..." ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:844 level=info msg="Scrape discovery manager stopped" ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=manager.go:937 level=info component="rule manager" msg="Starting rule manager..." ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:1120 level=info msg="Notifier manager stopped" ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:1129 level=error err="opening storage failed: /prometheus/chunks_head/000002: invalid magic number 0"
This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2073220](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073220). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.*
How reproducible: always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set audit profile to WriteRequestBodies
2. Wait for api server rollout to complete
3. tail -f /var/log/kube-apiserver/audit.log | grep routes/status
Actual results:
Write events to routes/status are recorded at the RequestResponse level, which often includes keys and certificates.
Expected results:
Events involving routes should always be recorded at the Metadata level, per the documentation at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/security/audit-log-policy-config.html#about-audit-log-profiles_audit-log-policy-config
Additional info:
OVS 2.17+ introduced an optimization of "weak references" to substantially speed up database snapshots. in some cases weak references may leak memory; to aforementioned commit fixes that and has been pulled into ovs2.17-62 and later.
Description of problem:
During ocp multinode spoke cluster creation agent provisioning is stuck on "configuring" because machineConfig service is crashing on the node.
After restarting the service still fails with
Can't read link "/var/lib/containers/storage/overlay/l/V2OP2CCVMKSOHK2XICC546DUCG" because it does not exist. A storage corruption might have occurred, attempting to recreate the missing symlinks. It might be best wipe the storage to avoid further errors due to storage corruption.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Podman 4.0.2 +
How reproducible:
sometimes
Steps to Reproduce:
1. deploy multinode spoke (ipxe + boot order ) 2. 3.
Actual results:
4 agents in done state and 1 is in "configuring"
Expected results:
all agents are in "done" state
Additional info:
issue mentioned in https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/14003
Fix: https://github.com/containers/storage/issues/1136
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1329. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted due to failed liveness probes while deleting/re-creating pods on SNO
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.32
How reproducible:
Not always, after ~10 attempts
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy SNO with Telco DU profile applied 2. Create multiple pods with local storage volumes attached(attaching yaml manifest) 3. Force delete and re-create pods 10 times
Actual results:
etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted, making to cluster unavailable for a period of time
Expected results:
etcd and kube-apiserver do not get restarted
Additional info:
Attaching must-gather. Please let me know if any additional info is required. Thank you!
Description of problem:
Looks like a regression was introduced and the Windows networking tests started to fail accross all 4.11 CI jobs for both Linux-to-Windows and Windows-to-Windows pods communication. https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1415 merged without passing Windows networking tests. https://github.com/openshift/windows-machine-config-operator/pull/1359 shows networking tests failing accross all CI jobs.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Trigger a job retest in any of the above mentioned PRs
Actual results:
Windows networking test fail
Expected results:
Windows networking test pass
Additional info:
Direct link to a release-4.11 aws-e2e-operator CI job showing the failed networking test.
We have created a fix in 4.12 that fetches instance type information from Azure API instead of updating the lists. We feel that backporting that fix is too risky, but agreed to update the list in older versions.
Description of problem:
Add the following instance types to azure_instance_types list[1]:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP 4.8
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Migrate worker/infra nodes to above mentioned (missing) v5 instance types
2. "Failed to set autoscaling from zero annotations, instance type unknown"
Actual results:
Expected results:
The new instance types are available in the azure_instance_types list[1] and no errors/warnings are observed after migrating:
Additional info:
The related v4 instance types are already available[1] - I suspect adding the mentioned v5 instance types is a minor update:
1) azure_instance_types.go
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-azure/blob/release-4.8/pkg/cloud/azure/actuators/machineset/azure_instance_types.go
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5067. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Since coreos-installer writes to stdout, its logs are not available for us.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Description of problem:
The 4.11 version of openshift-installer does not support the mon01 zone
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Description of problem:
The metal3 Pod of openshift-machine-api is in CrashLoopBackOff status.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.31
How reproducible:
Always reproduce in IPv6
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Preparing to configure ipi on the provisioning node - RHEL 8 ( haproxy, named, mirror registry, rhcos_cache_server ..) 2. configuring the install-config.yaml (attached) - provisioningNetwork: disabled - machine network: only IPv6 - disconnected installation 3. deploy the cluster
Actual results:
It is not possible to add worker nodes because metal3 does not start normally.
Expected results:
metal3 starts normally in IPv6 environment
Additional info:
1. attached must-gather https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GKxj3syROIMnURx_PYzOYhJdEuXBNXVW/view?usp=sharing 2. pod status [kni@prov ~]$ oc get pod NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE cluster-autoscaler-operator-6656bfd7b9-bt4j8 2/2 Running 0 35h cluster-baremetal-operator-6bbdd6758-rmxgq 2/2 Running 0 35h machine-api-controllers-55fb545b56-kl5sj 7/7 Running 0 34h machine-api-operator-845b6cf855-q7gdd 2/2 Running 0 35h metal3-574876cfdb-98fmz 6/7 CrashLoopBackOff 179 (3m17s ago) 14h metal3-image-cache-5mq2w 1/1 Running 0 14h metal3-image-cache-nftpj 1/1 Running 0 14h metal3-image-cache-t7whh 1/1 Running 0 14h metal3-image-customization-68d4d6d99b-dbqgn 1/1 Running 0 15h [kni@prov ~]$ oc logs metal3-574876cfdb-98fmz -c metal3-httpd AH00526: Syntax error on line 8 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/vmedia.conf: The port number "2001:feed:101::102" is outside the appropriate range (i.e., 1..65535).
Description of problem:
Availability Set will be created when vmSize is invalid in a region which has zones, but Availability Set should only be created in a region which don’t have zones.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-10-07-174524 4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-07-205844
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Set up a cluster in a region which has zones. liuhuali@Lius-MacBook-Pro huali-test % oc get machine NAME PHASE TYPE REGION ZONE AGE huliu-az410-99qcm-master-0 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 2 34m huliu-az410-99qcm-master-1 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 3 34m huliu-az410-99qcm-master-2 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 1 34m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus1-xld58 Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 1 27m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus2-chzg8 Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 2 27m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus3-7g2mw Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 3 27m 2.Create a machineset with invalid vmSize liuhuali@Lius-MacBook-Pro huali-test % oc create -f ms4.yaml machineset.machine.openshift.io/huliu-az410-99qcm-1 created liuhuali@Lius-MacBook-Pro huali-test % oc get machine NAME PHASE TYPE REGION ZONE AGE huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w Failed 8s huliu-az410-99qcm-master-0 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 2 35m huliu-az410-99qcm-master-1 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 3 35m huliu-az410-99qcm-master-2 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 1 35m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus1-xld58 Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 1 28m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus2-chzg8 Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 2 28m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus3-7g2mw Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 3 28m liuhuali@Lius-MacBook-Pro huali-test % oc get machine huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w -o yaml apiVersion: machine.openshift.io/v1beta1 kind: Machine metadata: annotations: machine.openshift.io/instance-state: Unknown creationTimestamp: "2022-10-08T07:42:28Z" finalizers: - machine.machine.openshift.io generateName: huliu-az410-99qcm-1- generation: 2 labels: machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-cluster: huliu-az410-99qcm machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machine-role: worker machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machine-type: worker machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machineset: huliu-az410-99qcm-1 name: huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w namespace: openshift-machine-api ownerReferences: - apiVersion: machine.openshift.io/v1beta1 blockOwnerDeletion: true controller: true kind: MachineSet name: huliu-az410-99qcm-1 uid: bf8f7518-1fa9-4704-bdd7-6d0fde54e38e resourceVersion: "31287" uid: 303cf672-a2fa-44f3-8793-59801bb78902 spec: lifecycleHooks: {} metadata: {} providerSpec: value: apiVersion: machine.openshift.io/v1beta1 credentialsSecret: name: azure-cloud-credentials namespace: openshift-machine-api image: offer: "" publisher: "" resourceID: /resourceGroups/huliu-az410-99qcm-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/huliu-az410-99qcm sku: "" version: "" kind: AzureMachineProviderSpec location: eastus managedIdentity: huliu-az410-99qcm-identity metadata: creationTimestamp: null name: huliu-az410-99qcm networkResourceGroup: huliu-az410-99qcm-rg osDisk: diskSettings: {} diskSizeGB: 128 managedDisk: storageAccountType: Premium_LRS osType: Linux publicIP: false publicLoadBalancer: huliu-az410-99qcm resourceGroup: huliu-az410-99qcm-rg spotVMOptions: {} subnet: huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-subnet userDataSecret: name: worker-user-data vmSize: invalidStandard_D4s_v3 vnet: huliu-az410-99qcm-vnet zone: "3" status: conditions: - lastTransitionTime: "2022-10-08T07:42:28Z" status: "True" type: Drainable - lastTransitionTime: "2022-10-08T07:42:28Z" message: Instance has not been created reason: InstanceNotCreated severity: Warning status: "False" type: InstanceExists - lastTransitionTime: "2022-10-08T07:42:28Z" status: "True" type: Terminable errorMessage: 'failed to reconcile machine "huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w": failed to create vm huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w: failure sending request for machine huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=0 -- Original Error: Code="BadRequest" Message="Virtual Machine cannot be created because both Availability Zone and Availability Set were specified. Deploying an Availability Set to an Availability Zone isn’t supported."' errorReason: InvalidConfiguration lastUpdated: "2022-10-08T07:42:35Z" phase: Failed providerStatus: conditions: - lastProbeTime: "2022-10-08T07:42:35Z" lastTransitionTime: "2022-10-08T07:42:35Z" message: 'failed to create vm huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w: failure sending request for machine huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=0 -- Original Error: Code="BadRequest" Message="Virtual Machine cannot be created because both Availability Zone and Availability Set were specified. Deploying an Availability Set to an Availability Zone isn’t supported."' reason: MachineCreationFailed status: "True" type: MachineCreated metadata: {}
Actual results:
Created Availability Set for it.
Expected results:
Should not create Availability Set, as the region has zones.
Additional info:
If provided correct vmSize, the machine get Running and will not create Availability Set for it. Not sure why it will create Availability Set for it when vmSize is invalid. The issue can be reproduced both on 4.11 and 4.10 version, as Availability Set is introduced in 4.10. On 4.12, there is bug https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-1871, will also check this on 4.12 when this bug get verified.
An RW mutex was introduced to the project auth cache with https://github.com/openshift/openshift-apiserver/pull/267, taking exclusive access during cache syncs. On clusters with extremely high object counts for namespaces and RBAC, syncs appear to be extremely slow (on the order of several minutes). The project LIST handler acquires the same mutex in shared mode as part of its critical path.
This is a copy of Bugzilla bug 2117524 for backport to 4.11.z
Original Text:
Description of problem:
On routers configured with mTLS and CRL defined in the CA with a CDP ; new CRL is downloaded only when restarting the ingress-operator.
2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z INFO operator.clientca_configmap_controller controller/controller.go:298 reconciling {"request": "openshift-ingress-operator/service-bdrc"} 2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z INFO operator.crl crl/crl_configmap.go:69 certificate revocation list has expired {"subject key identifier": "6aa909992e9890457b2a8de5659a44cab8e867a8"} 2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z INFO operator.crl crl/crl_configmap.go:69 retrieving certificate revocation list {"subject key identifier": "6aa909992e9890457b2a8de5659a44cab8e867a8"} 2022-07-20T23:36:26.943Z INFO operator.crl crl/crl_configmap.go:169 retrieving CRL distribution point {"distribution point": "http://crl.domain.com/der/CN=XXXX,OU=XXX,O=XXX,C=XXX"}
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9.33
How reproducible:
Enable mTLS with a CRL
Actual results:
CRL is not download when expired
Clients get "SSL client certificate not trusted" errors while accessing resources
Expected results:
ingress-operator triggers CRL download when approaching expiration date so that the configmap is updated without manual action
Description of problem:
When running node-density (245 pods/node) on a 120 node cluster, we see that there is a huge spike (~22s) in Avg pod-latency. When the spike occurs we see all the ovnkube-master pods go through a restart.
The restart happens because of (ovnkube-master pods)
2022-08-10T04:04:44.494945179Z panic: reflect: call of reflect.Value.Len on ptr Value
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-09-114621
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run node-density on a 120 node cluster
Actual results:
Spike observed in pod-latency graph ~22s
Expected results:
Steady pod-latency graph ~4s
Additional info:
Description of problem:
This bugs purpose is to enable a feature backport of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1949.
Description of problem:
When the user installs a helm chart, the dropdown to select a specific version is always disabled. Also for helm charts that can upgraded or downgraded after installation. For example the nodejs helm chart.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
At least 4.11, maybe all versions, but a backport to 4.11 is fine
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Switch to developer perspective 2. Navigate to Add > Helm chart 3. Select the Nodejs helm chart 4. Try to select another version .. When the user installs the not selectable version and edit the helm chart there is another version to selec
Actual results:
The version is not selectable.
Expected results:
The version should be selectable.
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-753. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
The default dns-default pod is missing the "target.workload.openshift.io/management:" annotation. As a result when the workload partitioning feature is enabled on SNO, this pod resources will not get mutated and pinned to the reserved cpuset. This is a regresion from 4.10. Pod spec from 4.10.17 Annotations: ... resources.workload.openshift.io/dns: {"cpushares": 51} resources.workload.openshift.io/kube-rbac-proxy: {"cpushares": 10} target.workload.openshift.io/management {"effect":"PreferredDuringScheduling"}
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.0
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install a SNO and check the annotation 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3824. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2598. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Liveness probe of ipsec pods fail with large clusters. Currently the command that is executed in the ipsec container is ovs-appctl -t ovs-monitor-ipsec ipsec/status && ipsec status The problem is with command "ipsec/status". In clusters with high node count this command will return a list with all the node daemons of the cluster. This means that as the node count raises the completion time of the command raises too.
This makes the main command
ovs-appctl -t ovs-monitor-ipsec
To hang until the subcommand is finished.
As the liveness and readiness probe values are hardcoded in the manifest of the ipsec container herehttps//github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/9c1181e34316d34db49d573698d2779b008bcc20/bindata/network/ovn-kubernetes/common/ipsec.yaml] the liveness timeout of the container probe of 60 seconds start to be insufficient as the node count list is growing. This resulted in a cluster with 170 + nodes to have 15+ ipsec pods in a crashloopbackoff state.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Openshift Container Platform 4.10 but i think the same will be visible to other versions too.
How reproducible:
I was not able to reproduce due to an extreamely high amount of resources are needed and i think that there is no point as we have spotted the issue.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install an Openshift cluster with IPSEC enabled 2. Scale to 170+ nodes or more 3. Notice that the ipsec pods will start getting in a Crashloopbackoff state with failed Liveness/Readiness probes.
Actual results:
Ip Sec pods are stuck in a Crashloopbackoff state
Expected results:
Ip Sec pods to work normally
Additional info:
We have provided a workaround where CVO and CNO operators are scaled to 0 replicas in order for us to be able to increase the liveness probe limit to a value of 600 that recovered the cluster. As a next step the customer will try to reduce the node count and restore the default liveness timeout value along with bringing the operators back to see if the cluster will stabilize.
Description of problem:
NodePort port not accessible
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP 4.8.20
How reproducible:
$oc -n ui-nprd get services -o wide
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE SELECTOR
docker-registry ClusterIP 10.201.219.240 <none> 5000/TCP 24d app=registry
docker-registry-lb LoadBalancer 10.201.252.253 internal-xxxxxx.xx-xxxx-1.elb.amazonaws.com 5000:30779/TCP 3d22h app=registry
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.216.26 <none> 5000:32428/TCP 3d16h app=registry
$oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxx.ca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.96
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -vz 10.81.23.96 32428
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connection timed out.
In a new-created namespaces the same deployment works:
[RHEL7:> oc project
Using project "test-c1" on server "https://api.xx.xx.xxxx.xx.xx:6443".
[RHEL7:- ~/tmp]> oc port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
Forwarding from 127.0.0.1:5000 -> 5000
[1]+ Stopped oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> bg %1
[1]+ oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000 &
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> nc -v localhost 5000
Ncat: Version 7.50 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 127.0.0.1:5000.
Handling connection for 5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> kill %1
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]>
[1]+ Terminated oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get services
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.224.174 <none> 5000:31793/TCP 68s
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get pods -o wide
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES
registry-75b7c7fd94-rx29j 1/1 Running 0 7m5s 10.201.1.29 ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal <none> <none>
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxxca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.87
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -v 10.81.23.87 31793
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 10.81.23.87:31793.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-675. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
A cluster hit a panic in etcd operator in bootstrap:
I0829 14:46:02.736582 1 controller_manager.go:54] StaticPodStateController controller terminated
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x1e940ab]
goroutine 2701 [running]:
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.checkSingleMemberHealth({0x29374c0, 0xc00217d920}, 0xc0021fb110)
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:135 +0x34b
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.getMemberHealth.func1()
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:58 +0x7f
created by github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.getMemberHealth
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:54 +0x2ac
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Pulled up a 4.12 cluster and hit panic during bootstrap
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
panic as above
Expected results:
no panic
Additional info:
Description of problem:
The last egressIP in IP capacity cannot be applied correctly
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-11-27-164248
How reproducible:
Found this failure in automation case which used to pass
Steps to Reproduce:
In AWS, one worker node is with IP capacity "ipv4:14" $oc describe node ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal | egrep -C 3 egress Annotations: cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig: [{"interface":"eni-03820ba0eca427fbf","ifaddr":{"ipv4":"10.0.128.0/18"},"capacity":{"ipv4":14,"ipv6":15}}] csi.volume.kubernetes.io/nodeid: {"ebs.csi.aws.com":"i-0cb3ae15bf3cffd9f"} k8s.ovn.org/host-addresses: ["10.0.129.21"]
1. Label above node as egress node
2. Created 15 egressIP objects, each egressIP object with one egressIP.
Actual results:
13 egressIPs applied correctly , last one is in wrong status. % oc get egressip NAME EGRESSIPS ASSIGNED NODE ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS egressip-47208-0 10.0.135.200 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.135.200 egressip-47208-1 10.0.162.178 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.162.178 egressip-47208-10 10.0.144.46 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.144.46 egressip-47208-11 10.0.191.91 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.191.91 egressip-47208-12 10.0.133.215 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.133.215 egressip-47208-13 10.0.174.207 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.174.207 egressip-47208-14 10.0.176.224 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.176.224 egressip-47208-2 10.0.184.114 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.184.114 egressip-47208-3 10.0.167.224 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.167.224 egressip-47208-4 10.0.187.148 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.187.148 egressip-47208-5 10.0.184.109 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.184.109 egressip-47208-6 10.0.155.208 egressip-47208-7 10.0.134.13 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.134.13 egressip-47208-8 10.0.142.255 ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal 10.0.142.255 egressip-47208-9 10.0.170.197 % oc get cloudprivateipconfig NAME AGE 10.0.133.215 113s 10.0.134.13 113s 10.0.135.200 113s 10.0.142.255 113s 10.0.144.46 113s 10.0.155.208 113s 10.0.162.178 113s 10.0.167.224 113s 10.0.174.207 113s 10.0.176.224 113s 10.0.184.109 113s 10.0.184.114 113s 10.0.187.148 113s 10.0.191.91 113s oc get cloudprivateipconfig 10.0.155.208 -o yaml apiVersion: cloud.network.openshift.io/v1 kind: CloudPrivateIPConfig metadata: annotations: k8s.ovn.org/egressip-owner-ref: egressip-47208-6 creationTimestamp: "2022-11-28T09:13:47Z" finalizers: - cloudprivateipconfig.cloud.network.openshift.io/finalizer generation: 1 name: 10.0.155.208 resourceVersion: "72869" uid: 0143a07b-0a30-4de8-bfd7-589ed0c3d7dc spec: node: ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal status: conditions: - lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-28T09:16:51Z" message: 'Error processing cloud assignment request, err: <nil>' observedGeneration: 1 reason: CloudResponseError status: "False" type: Assigned node: ip-10-0-129-21.us-west-2.compute.internal
Expected results:
As IP capacity for this node is 14, so here should have 14 egress IP applied successfully. No cloudprivateipconfig IP in error status.
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5185. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5165. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Currently, the Dev Sandbox clusters sends the clusterType "OSD" instead of "DEVSANDBOX" because the configuration annotations of the console config are automatically overridden by some SyncSets.
Open Dev Sandbox and browser console and inspect window.SERVER_FLAGS.telemetry
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-416. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
The pod fails to mount the PVC using IBM Cloud VPC block storage.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
The steps can be followed here: from this link
https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/openshift?topic=openshift-vpc-block
.
The error occurs when the application pod tried to mount the VPC.
Steps to Reproduce:
Describe above.
Actual results:
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal Scheduled 26m default-scheduler Successfully assigned default/test to a100-huge-m25p7-worker-3-with-secondary-xdwvl
Normal SuccessfulAttachVolume 26m attachdetach-controller AttachVolume.Attach succeeded for volume "pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba"
Warning FailedMount 26m (x2 over 26m) kubelet MountVolume.MountDevice failed for volume "pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba" : rpc error: code = Internal desc = {RequestID: ffbb97b4-e4d0-4016-87a9-dc46f80c5478 , Code: FormatAndMountFailed, Description: Failed to format '/dev/disk/by-id/virtio-0777-6872e22d-5c00-4' and mount it at '/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/csi/pv/pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba/globalmount', BackendError: format of disk "/dev/disk/by-id/virtio-0777-6872e22d-5c00-4" failed: type"ext4") target
"/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/csi/pv/pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba/globalmount") options
"defaults") errcode:(exit status 1) output:(mke2fs 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
The file /dev/disk/by-id/virtio-0777-6872e22d-5c00-4 does not exist and no size was specified.
) , Action: Please check if there is any error in POD describe related with volume attach}
Warning FailedMount 22m kubelet Unable to attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[bs-pvc], unattached volumes=[kube-api-access-6bgvj bs-pvc]: timed out waiting for the condition
Warning FailedMount 4m11s (x9 over 24m) kubelet Unable to attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[bs-pvc], unattached volumes=[bs-pvc kube-api-access-6bgvj]: timed out waiting for the condition
Warning FailedMount 3m51s (x17 over 26m) kubelet MountVolume.MountDevice failed for volume "pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba" : rpc error: code = Internal desc = {RequestID: 1a12a7c5-3bd0-41cf-b8a9-90dd3224c2fb , Code: FormatAndMountFailed, Description: Failed to format '/dev/disk/by-id/virtio-0777-6872e22d-5c00-4' and mount it at '/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/csi/pv/pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba/globalmount', BackendError: format of disk "/dev/disk/by-id/virtio-0777-6872e22d-5c00-4" failed: type"ext4") target
"/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/csi/pv/pvc-8721c341-739d-4607-bbcb-9dcf66ef6dba/globalmount") options
"defaults") errcode:(exit status 1) output:(mke2fs 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
Expected results:
The pod should successfully mount the PVC
Additional info:
Had a debugging session with Sameer Shaikh and Arashad Ahamad from the IBM VPC block storage team. The conclusion is that the udevadm utility is missing in the IPI image used by the IBM Cloud VPC block storage CSI.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1717. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Image registry pods panic while deploying OCP in me-central-1 AWS region
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.2
How reproducible:
Deploy OCP in AWS me-central-1 region
Steps to Reproduce:
Deploy OCP in AWS me-central-1 region
Actual results:
panic: Invalid region provided: me-central-1
Expected results:
Image registry pods should come up with no errors
Additional info:
Description of problem:
The test local-test is failing on openshift/thanos when upgrading golang version to 1.18 on the branch release-4.11. Please refer to this test log for details: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_thanos/82/pull-ci-openshift-thanos-release-4.11-test-local/1541516614497734656
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11
How reproducible:
See local-test job on pull request on the repository Openshift/Thanos
Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:
local-test fails on the following error: level=error ts=2022-06-27T20:28:12.306Z caller=web.go:99 component=web msg="panic while serving request" client=127.0.0.1:37064 url=/api/v1/metadata err="runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" stack="goroutine 278 [running]:\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web.withStackTracer.func1.1()\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/web.go:98 +0x99\npanic({0x1c34760, 0x308ad40})\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:838 +0x207\nreflect.mapiternext(0xc000458540?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/map.go:1378 +0x19\ngithub.com/modern-go/reflect2.(*UnsafeMapIterator).UnsafeNext(0x1bd62e0?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/modern-go/reflect2@v1.0.1/unsafe_map.go:136 +0x32\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*sortKeysMapEncoder).Encode(0xc000949d10, 0xc0002966b0, 0xc0006c7740)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect_map.go:297 +0x31a\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*onePtrEncoder).Encode(0xc0008cb120, 0xc000948fc0, 0xc0001139c0?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect.go:219 +0x82\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*Stream).WriteVal(0xc0006c7740, {0x1c16da0, 0xc000948fc0})\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect.go:98 +0x158\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*dynamicEncoder).Encode(0xc00094cd58?, 0xfa9a07?, 0xc0006c7758?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect_dynamic.go:15 +0x39\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*structFieldEncoder).Encode(0xc000949620, 0x1a4aaba?, 0xc0006c7740)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect_struct_encoder.go:110 +0x56\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*structEncoder).Encode(0xc000949740, 0x0?, 0xc0006c7740)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect_struct_encoder.go:158 +0x652\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*OptionalEncoder).Encode(0xc0001afd60?, 0x0?, 0x0?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect_optional.go:74 +0xa4\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*onePtrEncoder).Encode(0xc0008cad40, 0xc0006c76e0, 0xc000949020?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect.go:219 +0x82\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*Stream).WriteVal(0xc0006c7740, {0x1ac56e0, 0xc0006c76e0})\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect.go:98 +0x158\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*frozenConfig).Marshal(0xc0001afd60, {0x1ac56e0, 0xc0006c76e0})\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/config.go:299 +0xc9\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web/api/v1.(*API).respond(0xc0002d7a40, {0x229a448, 0xc00022bd60}, {0x1c16da0?, 0xc000948fc0}, {0x0?, 0x7fe5a05a5b20?, 0x20?})\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/api/v1/api.go:1437 +0x162\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web/api/v1.(*API).Register.func1.1({0x229a448, 0xc00022bd60}, 0x7fe5982c5300?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/api/v1/api.go:273 +0x20b\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x7fe5982c5300?, {0x229a448?, 0xc00022bd60?}, 0xc00072b270?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/util/httputil.CompressionHandler.ServeHTTP({{0x2290780?, 0xc000856288?}}, {0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b270?}, 0x228fb20?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/util/httputil/compression.go:90 +0x69\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web.(*Handler).testReady.func1({0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b270?}, 0x7fe5982c5300?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/web.go:499 +0x39\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x7fe5982c5300?, {0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b270?}, 0x50?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\ngithub.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promhttp.InstrumentHandlerResponseSize.func1({0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b220?}, 0xc000250c00)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/client_golang@v1.6.0/prometheus/promhttp/instrument_server.go:196 +0xa5\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x228fb80?, {0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b220?}, 0xc000948ed0?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\ngithub.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promhttp.InstrumentHandlerDuration.func2({0x7fe5982c5300, 0xc00072b220}, 0xc000250c00)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/client_golang@v1.6.0/prometheus/promhttp/instrument_server.go:76 +0xa2\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x22a4a68?, {0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b220?}, 0x0?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\ngithub.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promhttp.InstrumentHandlerCounter.func1({0x22a4a68?, 0xc00072b1d0?}, 0xc000250c00)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/client_golang@v1.6.0/prometheus/promhttp/instrument_server.go:100 +0x94\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web.setPathWithPrefix.func1.1({0x22a4a68, 0xc00072b1d0}, 0xc000250b00)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/web.go:1142 +0x290\ngithub.com/prometheus/common/route.(*Router).handle.func1({0x22a4a68, 0xc00072b1d0}, 0xc000250a00, {0x0, 0x0, 0xc00022c364?})\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/common@v0.10.0/route/route.go:83 +0x2ae\ngithub.com/julienschmidt/httprouter.(*Router).ServeHTTP(0xc0001cc780, {0x22a4a68, 0xc00072b1d0}, 0xc000250a00)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/julienschmidt/httprouter@v1.3.0/router.go:387 +0x82b\ngithub.com/prometheus/common/route.(*Router).ServeHTTP(0x8?, {0x22a4a68?, 0xc00072b1d0?}, 0x203000?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/common@v0.10.0/route/route.go:121 +0x26\nnet/http.StripPrefix.func1({0x22a4a68, 0xc00072b1d0}, 0xc000250900)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2127 +0x330\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x10?, {0x22a4a68?, 0xc00072b1d0?}, 0x7fe5c8423f18?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\nnet/http.(*ServeMux).ServeHTTP(0x413d87?, {0x22a4a68, 0xc00072b1d0}, 0xc000250900)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2462 +0x149\ngithub.com/opentracing-contrib/go-stdlib/nethttp.MiddlewareFunc.func5({0x22a3808?, 0xc000a282a0}, 0xc000250200)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/opentracing-contrib/go-stdlib@v0.0.0-20190519235532-cf7a6c988dc9/nethttp/server.go:140 +0x662\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x0?, {0x22a3808?, 0xc000a282a0?}, 0xffffffffffffffff?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web.withStackTracer.func1({0x22a3808?, 0xc000a282a0?}, 0xc0008ca850?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/web.go:103 +0x97\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x0?, {0x22a3808?, 0xc000a282a0?}, 0xc000100000?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\nnet/http.serverHandler.ServeHTTP({0xc000c55380?}, {0x22a3808, 0xc000a282a0}, 0xc000250200)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2916 +0x43b\nnet/http.(*conn).serve(0xc0000d1540, {0x22a4e18, 0xc00061a0c0})\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1966 +0x5d7\ncreated by net/http.(*Server).Serve\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:3071 +0x4db\n" level=error ts=2022-06-27T20:28:12.306Z caller=stdlib.go:89 component=web caller="http: panic serving 127.0.0.1:37064" msg="runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference"
Expected results:
local-test does no fail on the error above.
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5019. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4941. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem: This is a follow-up to OCPBUGS-3933.
The installer fails to destroy the cluster when the OpenStack object storage omits 'content-type' from responses, and a container is empty.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8.z
How reproducible:
Likely not happening in customer environments where Swift is exposed directly. We're seeing the issue in our CI where we're using a non-RHOSP managed cloud.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Description of problem:
Switching the spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.loadBalancer.scope of the default ingresscontroller results in a degraded ingress operator. The routes using that endpoint like the console URL become inaccessible.
Degraded operators after scope change:
$ oc get co | grep -v ' True False False' NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING DEGRADED SINCE MESSAGE authentication 4.11.4 False False True 72m OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org/healthz": EOF console 4.11.4 False False False 72m RouteHealthAvailable: failed to GET route (https://console-openshift-console.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org): Get "https://console-openshift-console.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org": EOF ingress 4.11.4 True False True 65m The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: CanaryChecksSucceeding=False (CanaryChecksRepetitiveFailures: Canary route checks for the default ingress controller are failing)
We have noticed that each time this happens the underlying AWS loadbalancer gets recreated which is as expected however the router pods probably do not get notified about the new loadbalancer. The instances in the new loadbalancer become 'outOfService'.
Restarting one of the router pods fixes the issue and brings back a couple of instances under the loadbalancer back to 'InService' which leads to the operators becoming happy again.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ingress in 4.11.z however we suspect this issue to also apply to older versions
How reproducible:
Consistently reproducible
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a test OCP 4.11 cluster in AWS 2. Switch the spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.loadBalancer.scope of the default ingresscontroller in openshift-ingress-operator to Internal from External (or vice versa) 3. New Loadbalancer is created in AWS for the default router service, however the instances behind are not in service
Actual results:
ingress, authentication and console operators go into a degraded state. Console URL of the cluster is inaccessible
Expected results:
The ingresscontroller scope transition from internal->External (or vice versa) is smooth without any downtime or operators going into degraded state. The console is accessible.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4696. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
metal3 pod does not come up on SNO when creating Provisioning with provisioningNetwork set to Disabled The issue is that on SNO, there is no Machine, and no BareMetalHost, it is looking of Machine objects to populate the provisioningMacAddresses field. However, when provisioningNetwork is Disabled, provisioningMacAddresses is not used anyway. You can work around this issue by populating provisioningMacAddresses with a dummy address, like this: kind: Provisioning metadata: name: provisioning-configuration spec: provisioningMacAddresses: - aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa provisioningNetwork: Disabled watchAllNamespaces: true
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.17
How reproducible:
Try to bring up Provisioning on SNO in 4.11.17 with provisioningNetwork set to Disabled apiVersion: metal3.io/v1alpha1 kind: Provisioning metadata: name: provisioning-configuration spec: provisioningNetwork: Disabled watchAllNamespaces: true
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
controller/provisioning "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="machines with cluster-api-machine-role=master not found" "name"="provisioning-configuration" "namespace"="" "reconciler group"="metal3.io" "reconciler kind"="Provisioning"
Expected results:
metal3 pod should be deployed
Additional info:
This issue is a result of this change: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/307 See this Slack thread: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CFP6ST0A3/p1670530729168599
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enable UWM + dedicated UWM Alertmanager
2. Deploy an application + service monitor + alerting rule which fires always
3. Go to the OCP dev console and silence the alert.
Actual results:
Nothing happens
Expected results:
The alert notification is muted.
Additional info:
Copied from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100860
The relevant code in ironic-image was not updated to support TLS, so it still uses the old port and explicit http://
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-669. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
This is an OCP clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099794 In summary, NetworkManager reports the network as being up before the ipv6 address of the primary interface is ready and crio fails to bind to it.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Description of problem:
Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.22
How reproducible: Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"
Steps to Reproduce:
Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"
Actual results: master nodes do come up.
Expected results: master nodes should come up despite that the text "master" is not in their hostname.
Additional info:
Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"
The code for the cluster-baremetal-operator at the following link:
The following condition is concerning:
if strings.Contains(bmh.Name, "master") && len(bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress) > 0
The packages reveal that bmh.Name references the name inside the metadata of the BMH object.
Should a customer have masters with names that do not include the text "master", the above condition can never become true, and so, the following slice is never created :
macs = append(macs, bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress)
This is a backport from https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-1044
Description of problem:
https://github.com/prometheus/node_exporter/issues/2299 The node exporter pod when ran on a bare metal worker using an AMD EPYC CPU crashes and fails to start up and crashes with the following error message. State: Waiting Reason: CrashLoopBackOff Last State: Terminated Reason: Error Message: 05.145Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=tapestats ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.145Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=textfile ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.145Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=thermal_zone ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=time ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=timex ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=udp_queues ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=uname ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=vmstat ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=xfs ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=zfs ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:199 level=info msg="Listening on" address=127.0.0.1:9100 ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=tls_config.go:195 level=info msg="TLS is disabled." http2=false panic: "node_rapl_package-0-die-0_joules_total" is not a valid metric name Apparently this is a known issue (See Github link) and was fixed in a later upstream.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.0
How reproducible:
Every-time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Provision a bare metal node using an AMD EPYC CPU 2. Node-exporter pods that try to start on the nodes will crash with error message
Actual results:
Node-exporter pods cannot run on the new nodes
Expected results:
Node exporter pods should be able to start up and run like on any other node
Additional info:
As mentioned above this issue was tracked and fixed in a later upstream of node-exporter https://github.com/prometheus/node_exporter/issues/2299 Would we be able to get the fixed version pulled for 4.11?
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1522. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Normal user cannot open the debug container from the pods(crashLoopbackoff) they created, And would be got error message: pods "<pod name>" is forbidden: cannot set blockOwnerDeletion if an ownerReference refers to a resource you can't set finalizers on: , <nil>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107, 4.11.z, 4.10.z
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login OCP as a normal user eg: flexy-htpasswd-provider 2. Create a project, go to Developer prespective -> +Add page 3. Click "Import from Git", and provide below data to get a Pods with CrashLoopBackOff state Git Repo URL: https://github.com/sclorg/nodejs-ex.git Name: nodejs-ex-git Run command: star a wktw 4. Navigate to /k8s/ns/<project name>/pods page, find the pod with CrashLoopBackOff status, and go to it details page -> Logs Tab 5. Click the link of "Debug container" 6. Check if the Debug container can be opened
Actual results:
6. Error message would be shown on page, user cannot open debug container via UI pods "nodejs-ex-git-6dd986d8bd-9h2wj-debug-tkqk2" is forbidden: cannot set blockOwnerDeletion if an ownerReference refers to a resource you can't set finalizers on: , <nil>
Expected results:
6. Normal user could use debug container without any error message
Additional info:
The debug container could be created for the normal user successfully via CommandLine $ oc debug <crashloopbackoff pod name> -n <project name>
Our Prometheus alerts are inconsistent with both upstream and sometimes our own vendor folder. Let's do a clean update run before the next release is branched off.
Description of problem:
When adding new nodes to the existing cluster, the newly allocated node-subnet can be overlapped with the existing node.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openshift 4.10.30
How reproducible:
It's quite hard to reproduce but there is a possibility it can happen any time.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a OVN dual-stack cluster 2. add nodes to the existing cluster 3. check the allocated node subnet
Actual results:
Some newly added nodes have the same node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP as some existing nodes.
Expected results:
Should have duplicated node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP
Additional info:
Additional info can be found at the case 03329155 and the must-gather attached(comment #1) % omg logs ovnkube-master-v8crc -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes -c ovnkube-master | grep '2022-09-30T06:42:50.857' 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857031565Z W0930 06:42:50.857020 1 master.go:1422] Did not find any logical switches with other-config 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857112441Z I0930 06:42:50.857099 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node worker01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857122455Z I0930 06:42:50.857105 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.129.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:a::/64] on Node oam04.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857130289Z I0930 06:42:50.857122 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node worker01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857140773Z I0930 06:42:50.857132 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.129.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:a::/64"]}] on node oam04.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857166726Z I0930 06:42:50.857156 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:5::/64] on Node oam01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857157 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857167 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:5::/64"]}] on node oam01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857185257Z I0930 06:42:50.857157 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.6.0/23 fd02:0:0:d::/64] on Node call03.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857192996Z I0930 06:42:50.857183 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857200017Z I0930 06:42:50.857190 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.6.0/23","fd02:0:0:d::/64"]}] on node call03.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857282717Z I0930 06:42:50.857258 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.130.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:7::/64] on Node call01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857304886Z I0930 06:42:50.857293 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.130.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:7::/64"]}] on node call01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857338896Z I0930 06:42:50.857314 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:9::/64] on Node f501.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857349485Z I0930 06:42:50.857329 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:8::/64] on Node call02.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857354 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:9::/64"]}] on node f501.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857361 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:8::/64"]}] on node call02.ss1.samsung.local
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4422. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2050230](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050230). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem:
In a large cluster, sdn daemonset can DoS the kube-apiserver with un-paginated LIST calls on high count resources.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
NA
Steps to Reproduce:
NA
Actual results:
Kube API Server and Openshift API Server in one of the cluster keeps restarting, without proper exception. The cluster is not accessible.
Expected results:
Kube API Server and Openshift API Server should be stable.
Additional info:
The kube-state-metric pod inside the openshift-monitoring namespace is not running as expected.
On checking the logs I am able to see that there is a memory panic
~~~
2022-11-22T09:57:17.901790234Z I1122 09:57:17.901768 1 main.go:199] Starting kube-state-metrics self metrics server: 127.0.0.1:8082
2022-11-22T09:57:17.901975837Z I1122 09:57:17.901951 1 main.go:66] levelinfomsgTLS is disabled.http2false
2022-11-22T09:57:17.902389844Z I1122 09:57:17.902291 1 main.go:210] Starting metrics server: 127.0.0.1:8081
2022-11-22T09:57:17.903191857Z I1122 09:57:17.903133 1 main.go:66] levelinfomsgTLS is disabled.http2false
2022-11-22T09:57:17.906272505Z I1122 09:57:17.906224 1 builder.go:191] Active resources: certificatesigningrequests,configmaps,cronjobs,daemonsets,deployments,endpoints,horizontalpodautoscalers,ingresses,jobs,leases,limitranges,mutatingwebhookconfigurations,namespaces,networkpolicies,nodes,persistentvolumeclaims,persistentvolumes,poddisruptionbudgets,pods,replicasets,replicationcontrollers,resourcequotas,secrets,services,statefulsets,storageclasses,validatingwebhookconfigurations,volumeattachments
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z E1122 09:57:17.917560 1 runtime.go:78] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z goroutine 24 [running]:
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic(
)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:1038 +0x215
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/internal/store.ingressMetricFamilies.func6(0x40)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/internal/store/ingress.go:136 +0x189
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/internal/store.wrapIngressFunc.func1(
)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/pkg/metric_generator/generator.go:107 +0xd8
~~~
Logs are attached to the support case
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6018. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a public clone of OCPBUGS-3821
The MCO can sometimes render a rendered-config in the middle of an upgrade with old MCs, e.g.:
This will cause the render controller to create a new rendered MC that uses the OLD kubeletconfig-MC, which at best is a double reboot for 1 node, and at worst block the update and break maxUnavailable nodes per pool.
Origin tests for the bond-cni
Backport of https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27405
The two modules that are auto generated for the CLI docs need to add ":_content-type: REFERENCE" to the top of the files. Update the doc generation templates to add these.
Description of problem:
We need to have admin-ack in 4.11 so that admins can check the deprecated APIs and approve when they move to 4.12.Refer https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for more information. As planned we want to add the admin-ack around 4.12 feature freeze.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install a cluster in 4.11. 2. Run an application which uses the deprecated API. See https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for more information. 3. Upgrade to 4.12
Actual results:
The upgrade happens without asking the admin to confirm that the worksloads do not use the deprecated APIs.
Expected results:
Upgrade should wait for the admin-ack.
Additional info:
We had admin-acks in the past too e.g. https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.9/updating/updating-cluster-prepare.html#update-preparing-migrate_updating-cluster-prepare
This was originally reported in BZ as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046335
—
Description of problem:
The issue reported here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954121 still occur (tested on OCP 4.8.11, the CU also verified that the issue can happen even with OpenShift 4.7.30, 4.8.17 and 4.9.11)
How reproducible:
Attach a NIC to a master node will trigger the issue
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy an OCP cluster (I've tested it IPI on AWS)
2. Attach a second NIC to a running master node (in my case "ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal")
Actual results:
~~~
$ oc get node ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal -o json | jq ".status.addresses"
[
,
,
,
{ "address": "ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal", "type": "InternalDNS" }]
$ oc get co etcd
NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING DEGRADED SINCE
etcd 4.8.11 True False True 31h
$ oc get co etcd -o json | jq ".status.conditions[0]"
{ "lastTransitionTime": "2022-01-26T15:47:42Z", "message": "EtcdCertSignerControllerDegraded: [x509: certificate is valid for 10.0.178.163, not 10.0.187.247, x509: certificate is valid for ::1, 10.0.178.163, 127.0.0.1, ::1, not 10.0.187.247]", "reason": "EtcdCertSignerController_Error", "status": "True", "type": "Degraded" }~~~
Expected results:
To have the certificate valid also for the second IP (the newly created one "10.0.187.247")
Additional info:
Deleting the following secrets seems to solve the issue:
~~~
$ oc get secret n openshift-etcd | grep kubernetes.io/tls | grep ^etcd
etcd-client kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 60s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 60s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 58s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 58s
$ oc get secret n openshift-etcd | grep kubernetes.io/tls | grep ^etcd | awk '
' | xargs -I {} oc delete secret {} -n openshift-etcd
secret "etcd-client" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
$ oc get co etcd -o json | jq ".status.conditions[0]"
{ "lastTransitionTime": "2022-01-26T15:52:21Z", "message": "NodeControllerDegraded: All master nodes are ready\nEtcdMembersDegraded: No unhealthy members found", "reason": "AsExpected", "status": "False", "type": "Degraded" }~~~
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4851. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4850. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Kuryr might take a while to create Pods because it has to create Neutron ports for the pods. If a pod gets deleted while this is being processed, a warning Event will be generated causing the "[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" to fail.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Description of problem: Backport owners for 4.11 (only)
Description of problem:
Intended to backport the corresponding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095852 which has been fixed already for this version.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-268. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
The linux kernel was updated:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/20/1030
to include steal
accounting
This would greatly assist in troubleshooting vSphere performance issues
caused by over-provisioned ESXi hosts.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4960. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
This is a follow up on OCPBUGSM-47202 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110570)
While OCPBUGSM-47202 fixes the issue specific for Set Pod Count, many other actions aren't fixed. When the user updates a Deployment with one of this options, and selects the action again, the old values are still shown.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable)
4.8-4.12 as well as master with the changes of OCPBUGSM-47202
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:
Old data (labels, annotations, etc.) was shown.
Expected results:
Latest data should be shown
Additional info:
As discussed previously by email, customer support case 03211616 requests a means to use the latest patch version of a given X.Y golang via imagestreams, with the blocking issue being the lack of X.Y tags for the go-toolset containers on RHCC.
The latter has now been fixed with the latest version also getting a :1.17 tag, and the imagestream source has been modified accordingly, which will get picked up in 4.12. We can now fix this in 4.11.z by backporting this to the imagestream files bundled in cluster-samples-operator.
/cc Ian Watson Feny Mehta
We will want to establish some basic metrics we can report back to Telemetry.
Let's consider:
Below is some background info from MTC when we added Telemetry support that may help
See: https://github.com/konveyor/metrics-queries/blob/master/README.md
Design/Development info:
OpenShift Monitoring Integration Guide
Monitoring integration with OLM operators
https://www.openshift.com/blog/observability-superpower-correlation
Source Code:
https://github.com/konveyor/mig-controller/blob/master/pkg/controller/migmigration/metrics.go
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4489. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4168. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Prometheus continuously restarts due to slow WAL replay
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openshift - 4.11.13
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6517. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
When the cluster is configured with Proxy the swift client in the image registry operator is not using the proxy to authenticate with OpenStack, so it's unable to reach the OpenStack API. This issue became evident since recently the support was added to not fallback to cinder in case swift is available[1].
[1]https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/819
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy a cluster with proxy and restricted installation 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3117. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3084. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Upstream Issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/77603
Long log lines get corrupted when using '--timestamps' by the Kubelet.
The root cause is that the buffer reads up to a new line. If the line is greater than 4096 bytes and '--timestamps' is turrned on the kubelet will write the timestamp and the partial log line. We will need to refactor the ReadLogs function to allow for a partial line read.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: logs
spec:
restartPolicy: Never
containers:
- name: logs
image: fedora
args:
- bash
- -c
- 'for i in `seq 1 10000000`; do echo -n $i; done'
kubectl logs logs --timestamps
Users can't configure the retention period for Thanos Ruler currently and the default value is 24h (from the prometheus operator).
Description of problem:
This issue exists to drive the backport process of https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1313
According to the Kubernetes documentation, starting from Kubernetes 1.22, the service-account-issuer flag can be specified multiple times. The first value is then used to generate new tokens and other values are accepted. Using this field can prevent cluster disruptions and allows for smoother reconfiguration of this field.
The status field will allow us to keep track of "used" service account issuers and also expire/prune them.
this is a replacement for: #1309
xref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-309
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This bug was initially created as a copy of
Bug #2096605
I am copying this bug because: the parent bug solved the validation aspect of diskType but now the description of diskType in
https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/data/data/install.openshift.io_installconfigs.yaml#L2914-L2923
needs to be updated.
Version: 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-06-06-201913
Platform: vSphere IPI
What happened?
1. If user inputs an invalid value for platform.vsphere.diskType in install-config.yaml file, there is no validation checking for diskType and doesn't exit with error, but continues the installation, which is not the same behavior as in 4.10.
After all vms are provisioned, I checked that the disk provision type is thick.
2. If user doesn't set platform.vsphere.diskType in install-config.yaml file, the default disk provision type is thick, but not the vSphere default storage policy. On VMC, the default policy is thin, so maybe the description of diskType should also need to be updated.
$ ./openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.vsphere.diskType
KIND: InstallConfig
VERSION: v1
RESOURCE: <string>
Valid Values: "","thin","thick","eagerZeroedThick"
DiskType is the name of the disk provisioning type, valid values are thin, thick, and eagerZeroedThick. When not specified, it will be set according to the default storage policy of vsphere.
What did you expect to happen?
validation for diskType
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
set diskType to invalid value in install-config.yaml and install the cluster
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5191. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5164. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
It looks like the ODC doesn't register KNATIVE_SERVING and KNATIVE_EVENTING flags. Those are based on KnativeServing and KnativeEventing CRs, but they are looking for v1alpha1 version of those: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/f72519fdf2267ad91cc0aa51467113cc36423a49/frontend/packages/knative-plugin/console-extensions.json#L6-L8
This PR https://github.com/openshift-knative/serverless-operator/pull/1695 moved the CRs to v1beta1, and that breaks that ODC discovery.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Openshift 4.8, Serverless Operator 1.27
Additional info:
https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CHGU4P8UU/p1671634903447019
Description of problem:
Currently when installing Openshift on the Openstack cluster name length limit is allowed to 14 characters. Customer wants to know if is it possible to override this validation when installing Openshift on Openstack and create a cluster name that is greater than 14 characters. Version : OCP 4.8.5 UPI Disconnected Environment : Openstack 16 Issue: User reports that they are getting error for OCP cluster in Openstack UPI, where the name of the cluster is > 14 characters. Error events : ~~~ fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"changed": true, "cmd": ["/usr/local/bin/openshift-install", "create", "manifests", "--dir=/home/gitlab-runner/builds/WK8mkokN/0/CPE/SKS/pipelines/non-prod/ocp4-openstack-build/ocpinstaller/install-upi"], "delta": "0:00:00.311397", "end": "2022-09-03 21:38:41.974608", "msg": "non-zero return code", "rc": 1, "start": "2022-09-03 21:38:41.663211", "stderr": "level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Master Machines: failed to load asset \"Install Config\": invalid \"install-config.yaml\" file: metadata.name: Invalid value: \"sks-osp-inf-cpe-1-cbr1a\": cluster name is too long, please restrict it to 14 characters", "stderr_lines": ["level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Master Machines: failed to load asset \"Install Config\": invalid \"install-config.yaml\" file: metadata.name: Invalid value: \"sks-osp-inf-cpe-1-cbr1a\": cluster name is too long, please restrict it to 14 characters"], "stdout": "", "stdout_lines": []} ~~~
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:
Users are getting error "cluster name is too long" when clustername contains more than 14 characters for OCP on Openstack
Expected results:
The 14 characters limit should be change for the OCP clustername on Openstack
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-262. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
github rate limit failures for upi image downloading govc.
Description of problem: defined in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051533
When adding remote worker node using ZTP the agent finishes the installation and is marked as done. oc get agent -o wide NAME CLUSTER APPROVED ROLE STAGE HOSTNAME REQUESTED HOSTNAME 0277804e-2a7c-4d95-9d0f-e22a190d582a spoke-0 true worker Done spoke-worker-0-0.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-worker-0-0 12efa520-5b99-4474-805d-931e46ad43f7 spoke-0 true master Done spoke-master-0-2.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-master-0-2 3b8eec89-f26f-4896-8f71-8a810894c560 spoke-0 true master Done spoke-master-0-0.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-master-0-0 3fb3749e-c132-4258-ad1a-08a0445c9022 spoke-0 true worker Done spoke-worker-0-1.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-worker-0-1 728559e9-5543-41d9-adb0-e58196f765af spoke-0 true master Done spoke-master-0-1.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-master-0-1 982e1ff6-6e83-4800-b061-8cdfd0b844fb spoke-0 true worker Done spoke-rwn-0-1.spoke-rwn-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-rwn-0-1 a76eaa6a-b351-429f-bfa1-e53a70503573 spoke-0 true worker Done spoke-rwn-0-0.spoke-rwn-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-rwn-0-0 Logging into the spoke cluster the bmh and machine resources are created and the node resource is not: oc get bmh -n openshift-machine-api NAME STATE CONSUMER ONLINE ERROR AGE spoke-master-0-0 unmanaged spoke-0-pxbfh-master-0 true 3h32m spoke-master-0-1 unmanaged spoke-0-pxbfh-master-1 true 3h32m spoke-master-0-2 unmanaged spoke-0-pxbfh-master-2 true 3h32m spoke-rwn-0-0-bmh externally provisioned spoke-0-spoke-rwn-0-0-bmh true provisioned registration error 168m spoke-rwn-0-1-bmh externally provisioned spoke-0-spoke-rwn-0-1-bmh true provisioned registration error 168m spoke-worker-0-0 unmanaged spoke-0-pxbfh-worker-0-65mrb true 3h32m spoke-worker-0-1 unmanaged spoke-0-pxbfh-worker-0-nnmcq true 3h32m oc get machine -n openshift-machine-api NAME PHASE TYPE REGION ZONE AGE spoke-0-pxbfh-master-0 Running 3h33m spoke-0-pxbfh-master-1 Running 3h33m spoke-0-pxbfh-master-2 Running 3h33m spoke-0-pxbfh-worker-0-65mrb Running 3h19m spoke-0-pxbfh-worker-0-nnmcq Running 3h20m spoke-0-spoke-rwn-0-0-bmh Provisioned 169m spoke-0-spoke-rwn-0-1-bmh Provisioned 169m Note: bmh is in error state: Normal ProvisionedRegistrationError 30m metal3-baremetal-controller Host adoption failed: Error while attempting to adopt node 529b3e75-5d04-4486-9296-269081d0ec02: Error validating Redfish virtual media. Some parameters were missing in node's driver_info. Missing are: ['deploy_kernel', 'deploy_ramdisk']. oc get nodes NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION spoke-master-0-0.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com Ready master 72m v1.22.3+2cb6068 spoke-master-0-1.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com Ready master 50m v1.22.3+2cb6068 spoke-master-0-2.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com Ready master 72m v1.22.3+2cb6068 spoke-worker-0-0.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com Ready worker 51m v1.22.3+2cb6068 spoke-worker-0-1.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com Ready worker 51m v1.22.3+2cb6068 node-bootstrapper CSR is created but not auto-approved; periodically another node-strapper csr is created until it is manually approved: oc get csr | grep Pending csr-5ll2g 9m9s kubernetes.io/kube-apiserver-client-kubelet system:serviceaccount:openshift-machine-config-operator:node-bootstrapper <none> Pending csr-f8vbl 8m24s kubernetes.io/kube-apiserver-client-kubelet system:serviceaccount:openshift-machine-config-operator:node-bootstrapper <none> Pending
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
assisted-service master at revision af0bafb3f7f629932f8c3dc31ccddedfe6984926 ocp version: 4.10.0-rc.1
How reproducible:
1. Install remote worker node using ztp 2. Wait for node resource to be created
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install remote worker node using ztp 2. Wait for node resource to be created
Actual results:
node-bootstrapper and node CSR are not auto-approved and node resource is not created. The bmh resource remains in registration error
Expected results:
node-bootstrapper and node CSR should be auto-approved and node resource created. The bmh resource should not be in registration error
Additional info:
We're seeing a slight uptick in how long upgrades are taking[1][2]. We are not 100% sure of the cause, but it looks like it started with 4.11 rc.7. There's no obvious culprits in the diff[3].
Looking at some of the jobs, we are seeing the gaps between kube-scheduler being updated and then machine-api appear to take longer. Example job run[4] showing 10+ minutes waiting for it.
TRT had a debugging session, and we have two suggestions:
[1] https://search.ci.openshift.org/graph/metrics?metric=job%3Aduration%3Atotal%3Aseconds&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-sdn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade
[2] https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=Cluster%20upgrade.%5Bsig-cluster-lifecycle%5D%20cluster%20upgrade%20should%20complete%20in%2075.00%20minutes
[3] https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4-stable/release/4.11.0-rc.7
[4] https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade/1556865989923049472
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2083. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Currently we are running VMWare CSI Operator in OpenShift 4.10.33. After running vulnerability scans, the operator was discovered to be running a known weak cipher 3DES. We are attempting to upgrade or modify the operator to customize the ciphers available. We were looking at performing a manual upgrade via Quay.io but can't seem to pull the image and was trying to steer away from performing a custom install from scratch. Looking for any suggestions into mitigated the weak cipher in the kube-rbac-proxy under VMware CSI Operator.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5100. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5068. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
virtual media provisioning fails when iLO Ironic driver is used
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.13
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. attempt virtual media provisioning on a node configured with ilo-virtualmedia:// drivers 2. 3.
Actual results:
Provisioning fails with "An auth plugin is required to determine endpoint URL" error
Expected results:
Provisioning succeeds
Additional info:
Relevant log snippet: 3742 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector [None req-e58ac1f2-fac6-4d28-be9e-983fa900a19b - - - - - -] Unable to start managed inspection for node e4445d43-3458-4cee-9cbe-6da1de75 78cd: An auth plugin is required to determine endpoint URL: keystoneauth1.exceptions.auth_plugins.MissingAuthPlugin: An auth plugin is required to determine endpoint URL 3743 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector Traceback (most recent call last): 3744 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/inspector.py", line 210, in _start_managed_inspection 3745 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector task.driver.boot.prepare_ramdisk(task, ramdisk_params=params) 3746 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic_lib/metrics.py", line 59, in wrapped 3747 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector result = f(*args, **kwargs) 3748 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/ilo/boot.py", line 408, in prepare_ramdisk 3749 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector iso = image_utils.prepare_deploy_iso(task, ramdisk_params, 3750 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/image_utils.py", line 624, in prepare_deploy_iso 3751 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector return prepare_iso_image(inject_files=inject_files) 3752 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/image_utils.py", line 537, in _prepare_iso_image 3753 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector image_url = img_handler.publish_image( 3754 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/image_utils.py", line 193, in publish_image 3755 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector swift_api = swift.SwiftAPI() 3756 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/common/swift.py", line 66, in __init__ 3757 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector endpoint = keystone.get_endpoint('swift', session=session)
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-884. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Since the decomissioning of the psi cluster, and subsequent move of the rhcos release browser, product builds machine-os-images builds have been failing. See e.g. https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=47565717
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12, 4.11, 4.10.
How reproducible:
Have ART build the image
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have ART build the image
Actual results:
Build failure
Expected results:
Build succesful
Additional info:
This is a clone of BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117374 which fixed 4.12
Description of problem:
OCP 4.11 introduced the `restricted-v2` SecurityContextConstraint as the default binding for all authenticated users. When a Pod that would have normally be admitted successfully using the `restricted` SCC, but cannot be admitted using a `restricted-v2` SCC, it's not clear to the customer that the problem is related to the default SCC changing from restricted to restricted-v2.
Suggestion is to generate an additional message for this specific use case that makes it clear to customers that they have a workload that is not compatible with restricted-v2.
Example message:
Error creating: pods "nginx-ingress-controller-75bffcfdf8-" is forbidden: the pod fails to validate against the default `restricted-v2` security context constraint, but would validate successfully against the `restricted` security context constraint.
The goal of such a message is to give the customer a breadcrumb that the `restricted-v2` SCC is activated and set as the default, which they may have not been aware of. This would give them a way to find alternatives, such as changing the global default, fixing the application or assigning the `restricted` SCC to the Namespace or ServiceAccount.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install OCP 4.11.0
2. Create a deployment with a podtemplate with .spec.containers[*].securityContext.allowPrivigeEscalation = true in a new namespace
Actual results:
The pod will fail to be admitted with an error such as:
Warning FailedCreate 27m (x25 over 76m) replicaset-controller Error creating: pods "nginx-ingress-controller-75bffcfdf8-" is forbidden: unable to validate against any security context constraint: [provider "anyuid": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, spec.containers[0].securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation: Invalid value: true: Allowing privilege escalation for containers is not allowed, provider "restricted": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "nonroot-v2": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "nonroot": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "noobaa": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "noobaa-endpoint": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostmount-anyuid": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "machine-api-termination-handler": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostnetwork-v2": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostnetwork": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostaccess": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "rook-ceph": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "node-exporter": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "rook-ceph-csi": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "privileged": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount]
Expected results:
Add an additional or replacement error message when there is no SCC assignment other than `restricted-v2` AND `restricted` would have worked:
Error creating: pods "nginx-ingress-controller-75bffcfdf8-" is forbidden: the pod fails to validate against the default `restricted-v2` security context constraint, but would validate successfully against the `restricted` security context constraint.
Additional info:
Description of problem:
Created two egressIP object, egressIPs in one egressIP object cannot be applied successfully
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-11-27-164248
How reproducible:
Frequently happen in auto case
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Label two nodes as egress nodes oc get nodes -o wide NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION INTERNAL-IP EXTERNAL-IP OS-IMAGE KERNEL-VERSION CONTAINER-RUNTIME huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-master-0 Ready master 154m v1.24.6+5658434 10.0.0.8 <none> Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 411.86.202211232221-0 (Ootpa) 4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64 cri-o://1.24.3-6.rhaos4.11.gitc4567c0.el8 huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-master-1 Ready master 154m v1.24.6+5658434 10.0.0.7 <none> Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 411.86.202211232221-0 (Ootpa) 4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64 cri-o://1.24.3-6.rhaos4.11.gitc4567c0.el8 huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-master-2 Ready master 153m v1.24.6+5658434 10.0.0.6 <none> Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 411.86.202211232221-0 (Ootpa) 4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64 cri-o://1.24.3-6.rhaos4.11.gitc4567c0.el8 huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1 Ready worker 135m v1.24.6+5658434 10.0.1.5 <none> Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 411.86.202211232221-0 (Ootpa) 4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64 cri-o://1.24.3-6.rhaos4.11.gitc4567c0.el8 huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2 Ready worker 136m v1.24.6+5658434 10.0.1.4 <none> Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 411.86.202211232221-0 (Ootpa) 4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64 cri-o://1.24.3-6.rhaos4.11.gitc4567c0.el8 % oc get node huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1 --show-labels NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION LABELS huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1 Ready worker 136m v1.24.6+5658434 beta.kubernetes.io/arch=amd64,beta.kubernetes.io/instance-type=Standard_D4s_v3,beta.kubernetes.io/os=linux,failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region=westus,failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone=0,k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable=true,kubernetes.io/arch=amd64,kubernetes.io/hostname=huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1,kubernetes.io/os=linux,node-role.kubernetes.io/worker=,node.kubernetes.io/instance-type=Standard_D4s_v3,node.openshift.io/os_id=rhcos,topology.disk.csi.azure.com/zone=,topology.kubernetes.io/region=westus,topology.kubernetes.io/zone=0 % oc get node huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2 --show-labels NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION LABELS huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2 Ready worker 136m v1.24.6+5658434 beta.kubernetes.io/arch=amd64,beta.kubernetes.io/instance-type=Standard_D4s_v3,beta.kubernetes.io/os=linux,failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region=westus,failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone=0,k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable=true,kubernetes.io/arch=amd64,kubernetes.io/hostname=huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2,kubernetes.io/os=linux,node-role.kubernetes.io/worker=,node.kubernetes.io/instance-type=Standard_D4s_v3,node.openshift.io/os_id=rhcos,topology.disk.csi.azure.com/zone=,topology.kubernetes.io/region=westus,topology.kubernetes.io/zone=0 2. Created two egressIP objects 3.
Actual results:
egressip-47032 was not applied to any egress node % oc get egressip NAME EGRESSIPS ASSIGNED NODE ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS egressip-47032 10.0.1.166 egressip-47034 10.0.1.181 huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1 10.0.1.181 % oc get cloudprivateipconfig NAME AGE 10.0.1.130 6m25s 10.0.1.138 6m34s 10.0.1.166 6m34s 10.0.1.181 6m25s % oc get cloudprivateipconfig 10.0.1.166 -o yaml apiVersion: cloud.network.openshift.io/v1 kind: CloudPrivateIPConfig metadata: annotations: k8s.ovn.org/egressip-owner-ref: egressip-47032 creationTimestamp: "2022-11-28T10:27:37Z" finalizers: - cloudprivateipconfig.cloud.network.openshift.io/finalizer generation: 1 name: 10.0.1.166 resourceVersion: "87528" uid: 5221075a-35d0-4670-a6a7-ddfc6cbc700b spec: node: huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1 status: conditions: - lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-28T10:33:29Z" message: 'Error processing cloud assignment request, err: <nil>' observedGeneration: 1 reason: CloudResponseError status: "False" type: Assigned node: huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1 % oc get cloudprivateipconfig 10.0.1.138 -o yaml apiVersion: cloud.network.openshift.io/v1 kind: CloudPrivateIPConfig metadata: annotations: k8s.ovn.org/egressip-owner-ref: egressip-47032 creationTimestamp: "2022-11-28T10:27:37Z" finalizers: - cloudprivateipconfig.cloud.network.openshift.io/finalizer generation: 1 name: 10.0.1.138 resourceVersion: "87523" uid: e4604e76-64d8-4735-87a2-eb50d28854cc spec: node: huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2 status: conditions: - lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-28T10:33:29Z" message: 'Error processing cloud assignment request, err: <nil>' observedGeneration: 1 reason: CloudResponseError status: "False" type: Assigned node: huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2 oc logs cloud-network-config-controller-6f7b994ddc-vhtbp -n openshift-cloud-network-config-controller ....... E1128 10:30:43.590807 1 controller.go:165] error syncing '10.0.1.138': error assigning CloudPrivateIPConfig: "10.0.1.138" to node: "huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2", err: network.InterfacesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=0 -- Original Error: Code="InvalidRequestFormat" Message="Cannot parse the request." Details=[{"code":"DuplicateResourceName","message":"Resource /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/ has two child resources with the same name (huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2_10.0.1.138)."}], requeuing in cloud-private-ip-config workqueue I1128 10:30:44.051422 1 cloudprivateipconfig_controller.go:271] CloudPrivateIPConfig: "10.0.1.166" will be added to node: "huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1" E1128 10:30:44.301259 1 controller.go:165] error syncing '10.0.1.166': error assigning CloudPrivateIPConfig: "10.0.1.166" to node: "huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1", err: network.InterfacesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=0 -- Original Error: Code="InvalidRequestFormat" Message="Cannot parse the request." Details=[{"code":"DuplicateResourceName","message":"Resource /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/ has two child resources with the same name (huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1_10.0.1.166)."}], requeuing in cloud-private-ip-config workqueue ..........
Expected results:
EgressIP can be applied successfully.
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-501. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.16
How reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Edit the apiserver resource and add spec.audit.customRules field
$ oc get apiserver cluster -o yaml
spec:
audit:
customRules:
2. Allow the kube-apiserver pods to rollout new revision.
3. Once the kube-apiserver pods are in new revision execute $ oc get dc
Actual results:
Error from server (InternalError): an error on the server ("This request caused apiserver to panic. Look in the logs for details.") has prevented the request from succeeding (get deploymentconfigs.apps.openshift.io)
Expected results: The command "oc get dc" should display the deploymentconfig without any error.
Additional info:
While running a PerfScale test we noticed that the hosted ovnkube-master pods always initially error on deployment. They eventually succeed on retry however.
This is running quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.11.11-x86_64 for the hosted clusters and the hypershift operator is quay.io/hypershift/hypershift-operator:4.11 on a 4.11.9 management cluster.
An example of the error in the ovnkube-master container:
```
F1102 13:27:51.935600 1 ovnkube.go:133] error when trying to initialize libovsdb SB client: unable to connect to any endpoints: failed to connect to ssl:ovnkube-master-0.ovnkube-master-internal.clusters-perf-pqd-0021.svc.cluster.local:9642: failed to open connection: dial tcp 10.131.8.25:9642: connect: connection refused. failed to connect to ssl:ovnkube-master-1.ovnkube-master-internal.clusters-perf-pqd-0021.svc.cluste
```
This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2118318](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118318). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2117569 +++
Description of problem:
The garbage collector resource quota controller must ignore ALL events; otherwise, if a rogue controller or a workload causes unbound event creation, performance will degrade as it has to process the events.
Fix: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/110939
This bug is to track fix in master (4.12) and also allow to backport to 4.11.1
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
— Additional comment from Michal Fojtik on 2022-08-11 10:52:28 UTC —
I'm using FastFix here as we need to backport this to 4.11.1 to avoid support churn for busy clusters or clusters doing upgrades.
— Additional comment from ART BZ Bot on 2022-08-11 15:13:32 UTC —
Elliott changed bug status from MODIFIED to ON_QA.
This bug is expected to ship in the next 4.12 release.
— Additional comment from zhou ying on 2022-08-12 03:03:34 UTC —
checked the payload commit id , the payload 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-11-191750 has container the fixed pr .
oc adm release info registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-11-191750 --commit-urls |grep hyperkube
Warning: the default reading order of registry auth file will be changed from "${HOME}/.docker/config.json" to podman registry config locations in the future version. "${HOME}/.docker/config.json" is deprecated, but can still be used for storing credentials as a fallback. See https://github.com/containers/image/blob/main/docs/containers-auth.json.5.md for the order of podman registry config locations.
hyperkube https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/commit/da80cd038ee5c3b45ba36d4b48b42eb8a74439a3
commit da80cd038ee5c3b45ba36d4b48b42eb8a74439a3 (HEAD -> master, origin/release-4.13, origin/release-4.12, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Merge: a9d6306a701 055b96e614a
Author: OpenShift Merge Robot <openshift-merge-robot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu Aug 11 15:13:05 2022 +0000
Merge pull request #1338 from benluddy/openshift-pick-110888
Bug 2117569: UPSTREAM: 110888: feat: fix a bug thaat not all event be ignored by gc controller
Description of problem:
[OVN][OSP] After reboot egress node, egress IP cannot be applied anymore.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-07-181244
How reproducible:
Frequently happened in automation. But didn't reproduce it in manual.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Label one node as egress node 2. Config one egressIP object STEP: Check one EgressIP assigned in the object. Nov 8 15:28:23.591: INFO: egressIPStatus: [{"egressIP":"192.168.54.72","node":"huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"}] 3. Reboot the node, wait for the node ready.
Actual results:
EgressIP cannot be applied anymore. Waited more than 1 hour. oc get egressip NAME EGRESSIPS ASSIGNED NODE ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS egressip-47031 192.168.54.72
Expected results:
The egressIP should be applied correctly.
Additional info:
Some logs E1108 07:29:41.849149 1 egressip.go:1635] No assignable nodes found for EgressIP: egressip-47031 and requested IPs: [192.168.54.72] I1108 07:29:41.849288 1 event.go:285] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"EgressIP", Namespace:"", Name:"egressip-47031", UID:"", APIVersion:"", ResourceVersion:"", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'NoMatchingNodeFound' no assignable nodes for EgressIP: egressip-47031, please tag at least one node with label: k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable W1108 07:33:37.401149 1 egressip_healthcheck.go:162] Could not connect to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107): context deadline exceeded I1108 07:33:37.401348 1 master.go:1364] Adding or Updating Node "huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q" I1108 07:33:37.437465 1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107)
After this log, seems like no logs related to "192.168.54.72" happened.
Backport clone of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-24281
openshift-4 tracking bug for telemeter-container: see the bugs linked in the "Blocks" field of this bug for full details of the security issue(s).
This bug is never intended to be made public, please put any public notes in the blocked bugs.
Impact: Moderate
Public Date: 11-Jan-2021
PM Fix/Wontfix Decision By: 04-May-2021
Resolve Bug By: 11-Jan-2022
In case the dates above are already past, please evaluate this bug in your next prioritization review and make a decision then. Remember to explicitly set CLOSED:WONTFIX if you decide not to fix this bug.
Please see the Security Errata Policy for further details: https://docs.engineering.redhat.com/x/9RBqB
4.12 will have an option in cri-o: add_inheritable_capabilities which will allow a user to opt-out of dropping inheritable capabilities (which comes as a fix for CVE-2022-27652). We should add it by default as a drop-in in 4.11 so clusters that upgrade from it inherit the old behavior
Description of problem:
Create Loadbalancer type service within the OCP 4.11.x OVNKubernetes cluster to expose the api server endpoint, the service does not response for normal oc request. But some of them are working, like "oc whoami", "oc get --raw /api"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.8 with OVNKubernetes
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Setup openshift cluster 4.11 on AWS with OVNKubernetes as the default network 2. Create the following service under openshift-kube-apiserver namespace to expose the api ---- apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: annotations: service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-connection-idle-timeout: "1800" finalizers: - service.kubernetes.io/load-balancer-cleanup name: test-api namespace: openshift-kube-apiserver spec: allocateLoadBalancerNodePorts: true externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster internalTrafficPolicy: Cluster ipFamilies: - IPv4 ipFamilyPolicy: SingleStack loadBalancerSourceRanges: - <my_ip>/32 ports: - nodePort: 31248 port: 6443 protocol: TCP targetPort: 6443 selector: apiserver: "true" app: openshift-kube-apiserver sessionAffinity: None type: LoadBalancer 3. Setup the DNS resolution for the access xxx.mydomain.com ---> <elb-auto-generated-dns> 4. Try to access the cluster api via the service above by updating the kubeconfig to use the custom dns name
Actual results:
No response from the server side. $ time oc get node -v8 I1025 08:29:10.284069 103974 loader.go:375] Config loaded from file: bmeng.kubeconfig I1025 08:29:10.294017 103974 round_trippers.go:420] GET https://rh-api.bmeng-ccs-ovn.3o13.s1.devshift.org:6443/api/v1/nodes?limit=500 I1025 08:29:10.294035 103974 round_trippers.go:427] Request Headers: I1025 08:29:10.294043 103974 round_trippers.go:431] Accept: application/json;as=Table;v=v1;g=meta.k8s.io,application/json;as=Table;v=v1beta1;g=meta.k8s.io,application/json I1025 08:29:10.294052 103974 round_trippers.go:431] User-Agent: oc/openshift (linux/amd64) kubernetes/e40bd2d I1025 08:29:10.365119 103974 round_trippers.go:446] Response Status: 200 OK in 71 milliseconds I1025 08:29:10.365142 103974 round_trippers.go:449] Response Headers: I1025 08:29:10.365148 103974 round_trippers.go:452] Audit-Id: 83b9d8ae-05a4-4036-bff6-de371d5bec12 I1025 08:29:10.365155 103974 round_trippers.go:452] Cache-Control: no-cache, private I1025 08:29:10.365161 103974 round_trippers.go:452] Content-Type: application/json I1025 08:29:10.365167 103974 round_trippers.go:452] X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid: 2abc2e2d-ada3-4cb8-a86f-235df3a4e214 I1025 08:29:10.365173 103974 round_trippers.go:452] X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid: 02f7a188-43c7-4827-af58-5ebe861a1891 I1025 08:29:10.365179 103974 round_trippers.go:452] Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:29:10 GMT ^C real 17m4.840s user 0m0.567s sys 0m0.163s However, it has the correct response if using --raw to request, eg: $ oc get --raw /api/v1 --kubeconfig bmeng.kubeconfig {"kind":"APIResourceList","groupVersion":"v1","resources":[{"name":"bindings","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Binding","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"componentstatuses","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"ComponentStatus","verbs":["get","list"],"shortNames":["cs"]},{"name":"configmaps","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ConfigMap","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["cm"],"storageVersionHash":"qFsyl6wFWjQ="},{"name":"endpoints","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Endpoints","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["ep"],"storageVersionHash":"fWeeMqaN/OA="},{"name":"events","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Event","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["ev"],"storageVersionHash":"r2yiGXH7wu8="},{"name":"limitranges","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"LimitRange","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["limits"],"storageVersionHash":"EBKMFVe6cwo="},{"name":"namespaces","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Namespace","verbs":["create","delete","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["ns"],"storageVersionHash":"Q3oi5N2YM8M="},{"name":"namespaces/finalize","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Namespace","verbs":["update"]},{"name":"namespaces/status","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Namespace","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"nodes","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Node","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["no"],"storageVersionHash":"XwShjMxG9Fs="},{"name":"nodes/proxy","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"NodeProxyOptions","verbs":["create","delete","get","patch","update"]},{"name":"nodes/status","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Node","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"persistentvolumeclaims","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PersistentVolumeClaim","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["pvc"],"storageVersionHash":"QWTyNDq0dC4="},{"name":"persistentvolumeclaims/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PersistentVolumeClaim","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"persistentvolumes","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"PersistentVolume","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["pv"],"storageVersionHash":"HN/zwEC+JgM="},{"name":"persistentvolumes/status","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"PersistentVolume","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"pods","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["po"],"categories":["all"],"storageVersionHash":"xPOwRZ+Yhw8="},{"name":"pods/attach","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodAttachOptions","verbs":["create","get"]},{"name":"pods/binding","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Binding","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"pods/ephemeralcontainers","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"pods/eviction","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"group":"policy","version":"v1","kind":"Eviction","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"pods/exec","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodExecOptions","verbs":["create","get"]},{"name":"pods/log","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["get"]},{"name":"pods/portforward","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodPortForwardOptions","verbs":["create","get"]},{"name":"pods/proxy","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodProxyOptions","verbs":["create","delete","get","patch","update"]},{"name":"pods/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"podtemplates","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodTemplate","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"storageVersionHash":"LIXB2x4IFpk="},{"name":"replicationcontrollers","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ReplicationController","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["rc"],"categories":["all"],"storageVersionHash":"Jond2If31h0="},{"name":"replicationcontrollers/scale","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"group":"autoscaling","version":"v1","kind":"Scale","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"replicationcontrollers/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ReplicationController","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"resourcequotas","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ResourceQuota","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["quota"],"storageVersionHash":"8uhSgffRX6w="},{"name":"resourcequotas/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ResourceQuota","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"secrets","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Secret","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"storageVersionHash":"S6u1pOWzb84="},{"name":"serviceaccounts","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ServiceAccount","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["sa"],"storageVersionHash":"pbx9ZvyFpBE="},{"name":"serviceaccounts/token","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"group":"authentication.k8s.io","version":"v1","kind":"TokenRequest","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"services","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Service","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["svc"],"categories":["all"],"storageVersionHash":"0/CO1lhkEBI="},{"name":"services/proxy","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ServiceProxyOptions","verbs":["create","delete","get","patch","update"]},{"name":"services/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Service","verbs":["get","patch","update"]}]}
Expected results:
The normal oc request should be working.
Additional info:
There is no such issue for clusters with openshift-sdn with the same OpenShift version and same LoadBalancer service. We suspected that it might be related to the MTU setting, but this cannot explain why OpenShiftSDN works well. Another thing might be related is that the OpenShiftSDN is using iptables for service loadbalancing and OVN is dealing that within the OVN services.
Please let me know if any debug log/info is needed.
See these threads https://coreos.slack.com/archives/G01F05P2PTL/p1645982017061749?thread_ts=1645970469.871559&cid=G01F05P2PTL for more information
Description of problem:
Provisioning interface on master node not getting ipv4 dhcp ip address from bootstrap dhcp server on OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install.
Customer is performing an OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install and bootstrap node provisions just fine, but when master nodes are booted for provisioning, they are not getting an ipv4 address via dhcp. As such, the install is not moving forward at this point.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP 4.10.16
How reproducible:
Perform OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install.
Actual results:
provisioning interface comes up (as evidenced by ipv6 address) but is not getting an ipv4 address via dhcp. OCP install / provisioning fails at this point.
Expected results:
provisioning interface successfully received an ipv4 ip address and successfully provisioned master nodes (and subsequently worker nodes as well.)
Additional info:
As a troubleshooting measure, manually adding an ipv4 ip address did allow the coreos image on the bootstrap node to be reached via curl.
Further, the kernel boot line for the first master node was updated for a static ip addresss assignment for further confirmation that the master node would successfully image this way which further confirming that the issue is the provisioning interface not receiving an ipv4 ip address from the dhcp server.
OCPBUGS-1251 landed an admin-ack gate in 4.11.z to help admins prepare for Kubernetes 1.25 API removals which are coming in OpenShift 4.12. Poking around in a 4.12.0-ec.2 cluster where APIRemovedInNextReleaseInUse is firing:
$ oc --as system:admin adm must-gather -- /usr/bin/gather_audit_logs $ zgrep -h v1beta1/poddisruptionbudget must-gather.local.1378724704026451055/quay*/audit_logs/kube-apiserver/*.log.gz | jq -r '.verb + " " + (.user | .username + " " + (.extra["authentication.kubernetes.io/pod-name"] | tostr ing))' | sort | uniq -c parse error: Invalid numeric literal at line 29, column 6 28 watch system:serviceaccount:openshift-machine-api:cluster-autoscaler ["cluster-autoscaler-default-5cf997b8d6-ptgg7"]
Finding the source for that container:
$ oc --as system:admin -n openshift-machine-api get -o json pod cluster-autoscaler-default-5cf997b8d6-ptgg7 | jq -r '.status.containerStatuses[].image' quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:f81ab7ce0c851ba5e5169bba717cb54716ce5457cbe89d159c97a5c25fd820ed $ oc image info quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:f81ab7ce0c851ba5e5169bba717cb54716ce5457cbe89d159c97a5c25fd820ed | grep github SOURCE_GIT_URL=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler io.openshift.build.commit.url=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler/commit/1dac0311b9842958ec630273428b74703d51c1c9 io.openshift.build.source-location=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler
Poking about in the source:
$ git clone --depth 30 --branch master https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler.git
$ cd kubernetes-autoscaler
$ find . -name vendor
./addon-resizer/vendor
./cluster-autoscaler/vendor
./vertical-pod-autoscaler/e2e/vendor
./vertical-pod-autoscaler/vendor
Lots of vendoring. I haven't checked to see how new the client code is in the various vendor packages. But the main issue seems to be the v1beta1 in:
$ git grep policy cluster-autoscaler/core cluster-autoscaler/utils | grep policy.*v1beta1 cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/actuator_test.go: policyv1beta1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/actuator_test.go: eviction := createAction.GetObject().(*policyv1beta1.Eviction) cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/drain.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/drain_test.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/legacy/legacy.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/legacy/wrapper.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/scaledown.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/static_autoscaler_test.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/utils/drain/drain.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/utils/drain/drain_test.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/utils/kubernetes/listers.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/utils/kubernetes/listers.go: v1policylister "k8s.io/client-go/listers/policy/v1beta1"
The main change from v1beta1 to v1 involves spec.selector; I dunno if that's relevant to the autoscaler use-case or not.
Do we run autoscaler CI? I was poking around a bit, but did not find a 4.12 periodic excercising the autoscaler that might have turned up this alert and issue.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5879. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5505. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
The upgradeability check in CVO is throttled (essentially cached) for a nondeterministic period of time, same as the minimal sync period computed at runtime. The period can be up to 4 minutes, determined at CVO start time as 2minutes * (0..1 + 1). We agreed with Trevor that such throttling is unnecessarily aggressive (the check is not that expensive). It also causes CI flakes, because the matching test only has 3 minutes timeout. Additionally, the non-determinism and longer throttling results makes UX worse by actions done in the cluster may have their observable effect delayed.
discovered in 4.10 -> 4.11 upgrade jobs
The test seems to flake ~10% of 4.10->4.11 Azure jobs (sippy). There does not seem to be that much impact on non-Azure jobs though which is a bit weird.
Inspect the CVO log and E2E logs from failing jobs with the provided [^check-cvo.py] helper:
$ ./check-cvo.py cvo.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL
Preferably, inspect CVO logs of clusters that just underwent an upgrade (upgrades makes the original problematic behavior more likely to surface)
$ ./check-cvo.py openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-5b6966c474-g4kwk_cluster-version-operator.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL FAIL: Cache hit at 11:59:55.332339 0:03:13.665006 after check at 11:56:41.667333 FAIL: Cache hit at 12:06:22.663215 0:03:13.664964 after check at 12:03:08.998251 FAIL: Cache hit at 12:12:49.997119 0:03:13.665598 after check at 12:09:36.331521 FAIL: Cache hit at 12:19:17.328510 0:03:13.664906 after check at 12:16:03.663604 FAIL: Cache hit at 12:25:44.662290 0:03:13.666759 after check at 12:22:30.995531 Upgradeability checks: 5 Upgradeability check cache hits: 12 FAIL
Note that the bug is probabilistic, so not all unfixed clusters will exhibit the behavior. My guess of the incidence rate is about 30-40%.
$ ./check-cvo.py openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-7b8f85d455-mk9fs_cluster-version-operator.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL Upgradeability checks: 12 Upgradeability check cache hits: 11 PASS
The actual numbers are not relevant (unless the upgradeabilily check count is zero, which means the test is not conclusive, the script warns about that), lack of failure is.
$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1607602927633960960/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/gather-extra/artifacts/pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-7b7d4b5bbd-zjqdt_cluster-version-operator.log | grep upgradeable.go ... I1227 06:50:59.023190 1 upgradeable.go:122] Cluster current version=4.10.46 I1227 06:50:59.042735 1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later. I1227 06:51:14.024345 1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later. I1227 06:53:23.080768 1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later. I1227 06:56:59.366010 1 upgradeable.go:122] Cluster current version=4.11.0-0.ci-2022-12-26-193640 $ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1607602927633960960/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12' Dec 27 06:51:15.319: INFO: Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired for "Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12 remove several APIs which require admin consideration. Please see the knowledge article https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for details and instructions." ... Dec 27 06:54:15.413: FAIL: Error while waiting for Upgradeable to complain about AdminAckRequired with message "Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12 remove several APIs which require admin consideration. Please see the knowledge article https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for details and instructions.": timed out waiting for the condition
The test passes. Also, the "Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later." messages in CVO logs should never occur after a deterministic, short amount of time (I propose 1 minute) after upgradeability was checked.
I tested the throttling period in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/880. With the period of 15m, the test passrate was 4 of 9. Wiht the period of 1m, the test did not fail at all.
Some context in Slack thread
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-451. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Git icon shown in the repository details page should be based on the git provider.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a Repository with gitlab repo url
2. Navigate to the detail page.
Actual results:
github icon is displayed for the gitlab url.
Expected results:
gitlab icon should be displayed for the gitlab url.
Additional info:
use `GitLabIcon` and `BitBucketIcon` from patternfly react-icons.
Description of problem:
During an upgrade from 4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-081345 -> 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-074353 DNS operator stuck in progressing state with following error in dns-defalt pod 2022-09-07T00:47:35.959931289Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: Kubernetes API connection failure: Get "https://172.30.0.1:443/version": dial tcp 172.30.0.1:443: i/o timeout must-gather: http://shell.lab.bos.redhat.com/~anusaxen/must-gather-136172-050448657.tar.gz
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-074353
How reproducible:
Intermittent
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Perform upgrade from 4.10->4.11 2. 3.
Actual results:
Upgrade unsuccessful due to API svc unreachability
Expected results:
Upgrade should be successful
Additional info:
$ omg get co | grep -v "True.*False.*False" NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING DEGRADED SINCE dns 4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-081345 True True False 3h4m network 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-074353 True True False 3h5m $ omg logs dns-default-5mqz4 -c dns -n openshift-dns /home/anusaxen/Downloads/must-gather-136208-318613238/must-gather.local.4033693973186012455/quay-io-openshift-release-dev-ocp-v4-0-art-dev-sha256-d995e1608ba83a1f71b5a1c49705aa3cef38618e0674ee256332d1b0e2cb0e23/namespaces/openshift-dns/pods/dns-default-5mqz4/dns/dns/logs/current.log 2022-09-07T00:45:36.355161941Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server 2022-09-07T00:45:36.854403897Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server 2022-09-07T00:45:37.354367197Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server 2022-09-07T00:45:37.861427861Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server 2022-09-07T00:45:38.355095996Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server 2022-09-07T00:45:38.855063626Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server 2022-09-07T00:45:39.355170472Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server 2022-09-07T00:45:39.855296624Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server 2022-09-07T00:45:40.355481413Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server 2022-09-07T00:45:40.855455283Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: starting server with unsynced Kubernetes API 2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z .:5353 2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z [INFO] plugin/reload: Running configuration SHA512 = 7c3db3182389e270fe3af971fef9e7157a34bde01eb750d58c2d4895a965ecb2e2d00df34594b6a819653088b6efa2590e748ce23f9e16cbb0f44d74a4fc3587 2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z CoreDNS-1.9.2 2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z linux/amd64, go1.18.4, 2022-09-07T00:46:05.957503195Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: Kubernetes API connection failure: Get "https://172.30.0.1:443/version": dial tcp 172.30.0.1:443: i/o timeout 2022-09-07T00:47:25.444876534Z [INFO] SIGTERM: Shutting down servers then terminating 2022-09-07T00:47:25.444984367Z [INFO] plugin/health: Going into lameduck mode for 20s 2022-09-07T00:47:35.959931289Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: Kubernetes API connection failure: Get "https://172.30.0.1:443/version": dial tcp 172.30.0.1:443: i/o timeout
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1549. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
The cluster-dns-operator does not reconcile the openshift-dns namespace, which has been exposed as an issue in 4.12 due to the requirement for the namespace to have pod-security labels. If a cluster has been incrementally updated from a version less than or equal to 4.9, the openshift-dns namespace will most likely not contain the required pod-security labels since the namespace was statically created when the cluster was installed with old namespace configuration.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12
How reproducible:
Always if cluster originally installed with v4.9 or less
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install v4.9 2. Upgrade to v4.12 (incrementally if required for upgrade path) 3. openshift-dns namespace will be missing pod-security labels
Actual results:
"oc get ns openshift-dns -o yaml" will show missing pod-security labels: apiVersion: v1 kind: Namespace metadata: annotations: openshift.io/node-selector: "" openshift.io/sa.scc.mcs: s0:c15,c0 openshift.io/sa.scc.supplemental-groups: 1000210000/10000 openshift.io/sa.scc.uid-range: 1000210000/10000 creationTimestamp: "2020-05-21T19:36:15Z" labels: kubernetes.io/metadata.name: openshift-dns olm.operatorgroup.uid/3d42c0c1-01cd-4c55-bf88-864f041c7e7a: "" openshift.io/cluster-monitoring: "true" openshift.io/run-level: "0" name: openshift-dns resourceVersion: "3127555382" uid: 0fb4571e-952f-4bea-bc45-461beec54369 spec: finalizers: - kubernetes
Expected results:
pod-security labels should exist: labels: kubernetes.io/metadata.name: openshift-dns olm.operatorgroup.uid/3d42c0c1-01cd-4c55-bf88-864f041c7e7a: "" openshift.io/cluster-monitoring: "true" openshift.io/run-level: "0" pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: privileged pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: privileged pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: privileged
Additional info:
Issue found in CI during upgrade
https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C03G7REB4JV/p1663676443155839
Description of problem:
Users on a fully-disconnected cluster could not see Devfiles in the developer catalog or import a Devfiles. That's fine.
But the API calls /api/devfile/samples/ and /api/devfile/ takes 30 seconds until they fail with a 504 Gateway timeout error.
If possible they should fail immediately.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
This might happen since 4.8
Tested this yet only on 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-07-112008
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
The console Pod log contains this error:
E0909 10:28:18.448680 1 devfile-handler.go:74] Failed to parse devfile: failed to populateAndParseDevfile: Get "https://registry.devfile.io/devfiles/go": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2094362](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094362). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem:
A change [1] was introduced to split the kube-apiserver SLO rules into 2 groups to reduce the load on Prometheus (see bug 2004585).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9 (because the change was backported to 4.9.z)
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install OCP 4.9
2. Retrieve kube-apiserver-slos*
oc get -n openshift-kube-apiserver prometheusrules kube-apiserver-slos -o yaml
oc get -n openshift-kube-apiserver prometheusrules kube-apiserver-slos-basic -o yaml
Actual results:
The KubeAPIErrorBudgetBurn alert with labels
{long="1h",namespace="openshift-kube-apiserver",severity="critical",short="5m"}exists both in kube-apiserver-slos and kube-apiserver-slos-basic.
The alerting rules is evaluated twice. The same is true for recording rules like "apiserver_request:burnrate1h" and in this case, it can trigger warning logs in the Prometheus pods:
> level=warn component="rule manager" group=kube-apiserver.rules msg="Error on ingesting out-of-order result from rule evaluation" numDropped=283
Expected results:
I presume that kube-apiserver-slos shouldn't exist since it's been replaced by kube-apiserver-slos-basic and kube-apiserver-slos-extended.
Additional info:
Discovered while investigating bug 2091902
Description of problem:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.
The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-baremetal-installer.yml.
The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.11
Additional info: This issue is needed for the bot-created PR to merge after the 4.11 GA.
Description of problem:
Data race seen in unit tests: https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_ovn-kubernetes/1448/pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.11-unit/1604898712423763968/artifacts/test/build-log.txt
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6850. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6503. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
While looking into OCPBUGS-5505 I discovered that some 4.10->4.11 upgrade job runs perform an Admin Ack check, while some do not. 4.11 has a ack-4.11-kube-1.25-api-removals-in-4.12 gate, so these upgrade jobs sometimes test that Upgradeable goes false after the ugprade, and sometimes they do not. This is only determined by the polling race condition: the check is executed once per 10 minutes, and we cancel the polling after upgrade is completed. This means that in some cases we are lucky and manage to run one check before the cancel, and sometimes we are not and only check while still on the base version.
Example job that checked admin acks post-upgrade:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444032104304640
$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444032104304640/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired' Jan 6 21:16:40.153: INFO: Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired ...
Example job that did not check admin acks post-upgrade:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444033509396480
$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444033509396480/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired'
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11+ openshift-tests
How reproducible:
nondeterministic, wild guess is ~30% of upgrade jobs
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Inspect the E2E test log of an upgrade jobs and compare the time of the update ("Completed upgrade") with the time of the last check ( "Skipping admin ack", "Gate .* not applicable to current version", "Admin Ack verified') done by the admin ack test
Actual results:
Jan 23 00:47:43.842: INFO: Admin Ack verified Jan 23 00:57:43.836: INFO: Admin Ack verified Jan 23 01:07:43.839: INFO: Admin Ack verified Jan 23 01:17:33.474: INFO: Completed upgrade to registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-z09ll8fw/release@sha256:322cf67dc00dd6fa4fdd25c3530e4e75800f6306bd86c4ad1418c92770d58ab8
No check done after the upgrade
Expected results:
Jan 23 00:57:37.894: INFO: Admin Ack verified Jan 23 01:07:37.894: INFO: Admin Ack verified Jan 23 01:16:43.618: INFO: Completed upgrade to registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-z8h5x1c5/release@sha256:9c4c732a0b4c2ae887c73b35685e52146518e5d2b06726465d99e6a83ccfee8d Jan 23 01:17:57.937: INFO: Admin Ack verified
One or more checks done after upgrade
Description of problem:
There is a bug affecting verify steps functionality on iDRAC hardware in OpenShift 4.11 and 4.10. Original bug report has been made against 4.10: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-1740 While I am not aware of this issue being reported against 4.11, due to the fact that the fix is only present in 4.12 codebase, 4.11 versions will also be affected by this issue. This bug is created to meet automation requirements for backporting the fixes from 4.12 version to 4.11 (and then to 4.11 in the bug quoted above).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2508. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Installer fails due to Neutron policy error when creating Openstack servers for OCP master nodes. $ oc get machines -A NAMESPACE NAME PHASE TYPE REGION ZONE AGE openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-master-0 Running 23h openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-master-1 Running 23h openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-master-2 Running 23h openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-g7nrw Provisioning 23h openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb Provisioning 23h openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-vwrsk Provisioning 23h $ oc -n openshift-machine-api logs machine-api-controllers-7454f5d65b-8fqx2 -c machine-controller [...] E1018 10:51:49.355143 1 controller.go:317] controller/machine_controller "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="error creating Openstack instance: Failed to create port err: Request forbidden: [POST https://overcloud.redhat.local:13696/v2.0/ports], error message: {\"NeutronError\": {\"type\": \"PolicyNotAuthorized\", \"message\": \"(rule:create_port and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address and rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address))) is disallowed by policy\", \"detail\": \"\"}}" "name"="ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb" "namespace"="openshift-machine-api"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install 4.10 within provider networks (in primary or secondary interface)
Actual results:
Installation failure: 4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020: some cluster operators have not yet rolled out
Expected results:
Successful installation
Additional info:
Please find must-gather for installation on primary interface link here and for installation on secondary interface link here.
Description of problem:
Each LB created for a Service type LoadBalancer results in 1 client rule and <# of public subnets> health rules being created. The rules per SG quota in AWS is quite small; 60 by default, and 200 hard max. OCP has about 40 rules OOTB. Assuming an HA cluster in 3 AZs, that is 4 rules per LB. With default AWS quota, only ~5 LBs can be create and with the hard max of 200, only ~40 LBs can be created.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create Service type LoadBalancer and observe increase in master-sg and worker-sg rules sets 2. 3.
Actual results:
4 rules are created
Expected results:
1 rules is created when the client rule is a superset of the per-subnet health rules
Additional info:
This ~4x the number of Services of type LoadBalancer. This is required for Hypershift.
Description of problem:
Whenever one runs ovnkube-trace from an in-cluster pod to a pod in the host network that is in different node, the following spurious error appears despite of the underlying ovn-trace being correct: ovn-trace indicates failure from ingress-canary-7zhxs to router-default-6758fb465c-s66rv - output to "k8s-worker-0.example.redhat.com" not matched This is caused because as per[1], if the destination pod is in host network, the outport is expected to be of the form "k8s-${NODE_NAME}", which is true only if either in local gateway or if the source pod is in the same node than the destination pod. This is already fixed in the master branch[2], but we would need this to be backported to previous releases.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.4
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. ovnkube-trace from pod in the SDN to pod in host network 2. 3.
Actual results:
Wrong error
Expected results:
No wrong error
Additional info:
References: [1] - https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/blob/release-4.11/go-controller/cmd/ovnkube-trace/ovnkube-trace.go#L771-L777 [2] - https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/blob/master/go-controller/cmd/ovnkube-trace/ovnkube-trace.go#L755-L769
[Updated story request]
Decision is to always display Red Hat OpenShift logo for OCP instead of conditionally. And also update the OCP login, errors, providers templates. https://openshift.github.io/oauth-templates/
Related note in comments.
[Original request]
If the ACM or the ACS dynamic plugin is enabled and there is not a custom branding set, then the default "Red Hat Openshift" branding should be shown.
This was identified as an issue during the Hybrid Console Scrum on 11/15/20201
PRs associated with this change
https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10940 [merged]
https://github.com/openshift/oauth-templates/pull/20 [merged]
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-authentication-operator/pull/540 [merged]
Clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106803 to backport the e2e fix to 4.11 and 4.10.
Description of problem: E2E: intermittent failure is seen on tests for devfile due to network call to devfile registry
Deploy git workload with devfile from topology page: A-04-TC01
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible: Intermittent
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run test for add-flow-ci.feature to test Deploy git workload with devfile from topology page: A-04-TC01
Actual results:
Expected results: Show always pass
Additional info:
Changelog between 3.5.5 and 3.5.4:
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-3.5.md#v355-tbd
Changelog between 3.5.3 and 3.5.4:
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-3.5.md#v354-2022-04-24
Description of problem:
release-4.11 of openshift/cloud-provider-openstack is missing some commits that were backported in upstream project into the release-1.24 branch. We should import them in our downstream fork.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Since 4.11 OCP comes with OperatorHub definition which declares a capability
and enables all catalog sources. For OKD we want to enable just community-operators
as users may not have Red Hat pull secret set.
This commit would ensure that OKD version of marketplace operator gets
its own OperatorHub manifest with a custom set of operator catalogs enabled
During initial backporting, due to a number of other colliding commits in upstream, the cobra commands facilitating caching did not get downstreamed.
This is to downstream those two lines.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2495. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Failures like:
$ oc login --token=... Logged into "https://api..." as "..." using the token provided. Error from server (Timeout): the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get projects.project.openshift.io)
break login, which tries to gather information before saving the configuration, including a giant project list.
Ideally login would be able to save the successful login credentials, even when the informative gathering had difficulties. And possibly the informative gathering could be made conditional (--quiet or similar?) so expensive gathering could be skipped in use-cases where the context was not needed.
Description of problem:
-----------------------
On dualstack baremetal IPI cluster next error message is present in ovnkube logs:
oc logs -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-node-rvggh -c ovnkube-node
...
E0810 02:12:46.343460 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:13:16.347603 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:13:46.351108 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:14:16.355047 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:14:46.358950 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:15:13.313945 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Service total 9 items received
E0810 02:15:16.362737 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:15:46.366490 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:16:16.369963 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:16:24.306561 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Endpoints total 560 items received
E0810 02:16:46.373482 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:17:16.377497 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:17:46.380726 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:18:15.325871 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Node total 50 items received
E0810 02:18:16.384732 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:18:38.299738 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Pod total 9 items received
E0810 02:18:46.388162 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", err