Problem:

Certain Insights Advisor features differentiate between RHEL and OCP advisor

Goal:

Address top priority UI misalignments between RHEL and OCP advisor. Address UI features dropped from Insights ADvisor for OCP GA.

Scope:

Specific tasks and priority of them tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-7432

Managing PVs at scale for a fleet creates difficulties where "one size does not fit all". The ability for SRE to deploy prometheus with PVs and have retention based an on a desired size would enable easier management of these volumes across the fleet. 

The prometheus-operator exposes retentionSize.

This is a feature request to enable this configuration option via CMO cluster-monitoring-config ConfigMap.

cc Simon Pasquier  

Problem Alignment

The Problem

Today, all configuration for setting individual, for example, routing configuration is done via a single configuration file that only admins have access to. If an environment uses multiple tenants and each tenant, for example, has different systems that they are using to notify teams in case of an issue, then someone needs to file a request w/ an admin to add the required settings.

That can be bothersome for individual teams, since requests like that usually disappear in the backlog of an administrator. At the same time, administrators might get tons of requests that they have to look at and prioritize, which takes them away from more crucial work.

We would like to introduce a more self service approach whereas individual teams can create their own configuration for their needs w/o the administrators involvement.

Last but not least, since Monitoring is deployed as a Core service of OpenShift there are multiple restrictions that the SRE team has to apply to all OSD and ROSA clusters. One restriction is the ability for customers to use the central Alertmanager that is owned and managed by the SRE team. They can't give access to the central managed secret due to security concerns so that users can add their own routing information.

High-Level Approach

Provide a new API (based on the Operator CRD approach) as part of the Prometheus Operator that allows creating a subset of the Alertmanager configuration without touching the central Alertmanager configuration file.

Please note that we do not plan to support additional individual webhooks with this work. Customers will need to deploy their own version of the third party webhooks.

Goal & Success

• Allow users to deploy individual configurations that allow setting up Alertmanager for their needs without an administrator.

Solution Alignment

Key Capabilities

• As an OpenShift administrator, I want to control who can CRUD individual configuration so that I can make sure that any unknown third person can touch the central Alertmanager instance shipped within OpenShift Monitoring.
• As a team owner, I want to deploy a routing configuration to push notifications for alerts to my system of choice.

Key Flows

Team A wants to send all their important notifications to a specific Slack channel.

• Administrator gives permission to Team A to allow creating a new configuration CR in their individual namespace.
• Team A creates a new configuration CR.
• Team A configures what alerts should go into their Slack channel.
• Open Questions & Key Decisions (optional)
• Do we want to improve anything inside the developer console to allow configuration?

Copy/paste from [_https://github.com/openshift-cs/managed-openshift/issues/60_]

Which service is this feature request for?
OpenShift Dedicated and Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS

What are you trying to do?
Allow ROSA/OSD to integrate with AWS Managed Prometheus.

Describe the solution you'd like
Remote-write of metrics is supported in OpenShift but it does not work with AWS Managed Prometheus since AWS Managed Prometheus requires AWS SigV4 auth.

• Note that Prometheus supports AWS SigV4 since v2.26 and OpenShift 4.9 uses v2.29.

Describe alternatives you've considered
There is the workaround to use the "AWS SigV4 Proxy" but I'd think this is not properly supported by RH.
https://mobb.ninja/docs/rosa/cluster-metrics-to-aws-prometheus/

Additional context
The customer wants to use an open and portable solution to centralize metrics storage and analysis. If they also deploy to other clouds, they don't want to have to re-configure. Since most clouds offer a Prometheus service (or it's easy to self-manage Prometheus), app migration should be simplified.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.

Feature Overview.

Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.

While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.

 For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.

Goals

• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane topology to host more workloads capacity - add worker
• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane to be a highly available control plane
• To satisfy MMIMO Telecommunications providers will want the ability to scale a SNO to a multi-node cluster that can support HPA.
• Telecommunications providers do not want workload (DU specifically) downtime when migrating from SNO to a multi-node cluster.
• Telecommunications providers wish to be able to scale from one to two or more nodes to support a variety of radio hardware.
• Support CP scaling (CP HA) for 2 node cluster, 3 node cluster and n node cluster. As the number of nodes in the cluster increases so does the failure domain of the cluster. The cluster is now supporting more cell sectors and therefore has more of a need for HA and resiliency including the cluster CP.

Requirements

• TBD

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

• As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.

• As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

• Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

• Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
• Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
• Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
• Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
• In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
• For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
• Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
• The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
• The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

• As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
• As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
• As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
• As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
• As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

• As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
• As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

• This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• Bootable Ephemeral Installer Image for Disconnected Cluster 0 Deployments

Feature Overview

The AWS-specific code added in OCPPLAN-6006 needs to become GA and with this we want to introduce a couple of Day2 improvements.
Currently the AWS tags are defined and applied at installation time only and saved in the infrastructure CRD's status field for further operator use, which in turn just add the tags during creation.

Saving in the status field means it's not included in Velero backups, which is a crucial feature for customers and Day2.
Thus the status.resourceTags field should be deprecated in favour of a newly created spec.resourceTags with the same content. The installer should only populate the spec, consumers of the infrastructure CRD must favour the spec over the status definition if both are supplied, otherwise the status should be honored and a warning shall be issued.

Being part of the spec, the behaviour should also tag existing resources that do not have the tags yet and once the tags in the infrastructure CRD are changed all the AWS resources should be updated accordingly.

On AWS this can be done without re-creating any resources (the behaviour is basically an upsert by tag key) and is possible without service interruption as it is a metadata operation.

Tag deletes continue to be out of scope, as the customer can still have custom tags applied to the resources that we do not want to delete.

Due to the ongoing intree/out of tree split on the cloud and CSI providers, this should not apply to clusters with intree providers (!= "external").

Once confident we have all components updated, we should introduce an end2end test that makes sure we never create resources that are untagged.

After that, we can remove the experimental flag and make this a GA feature.

Goals

• Inclusion in the cluster backups
• Flexibility of changing tags during cluster lifetime, without recreating the whole cluster

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

List any affected packages or components.

• Installer
• Cluster Infrastructure
• Storage
• Node
• NetworkEdge
• Internal Registry
• CCO

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Feature --->
<--- Remove the descriptive text as appropriate --->

Feature Overview

• As RH OpenShift Product Owners, we want to enable new providers/platforms/service with varying levels of capabilities and integration with minimal reliance on OpenShift Engineering.
• As a new provider/platform partner, I want to enable my solution (hardware and/or software) with OpenShift with minimal effort.

Problem

• It is currently challenging for us to enable new platforms / providers without taking the heavy burden on doing the platform specific development ourselves.

Goals

• We want to enable the long-tail new platforms/providers to expand our reach into new markets and/or support new use cases.
• We want to remove strict dependencies we have on Engineering teams to review, support and test new providers.
• We want to lower the effort required for onboarding new platforms/providers.
• We want to enable new platform/providers to self-certify.
• We want to define tiered model for provider/platform integration that delineates ownership and responsibilities throughout new provider/platform development lifecycle and support model.
• We want to reduce time to onboard new provider/platform – ideally to a single release.
• We want to maintain consistent customer experience across all providers/platforms.

Requirements

• Step-by-step guide on how to add a new platform/provider for each tier
• Certification tool for partner to self-certify
• Certification tool results for (at least) each Y/minor release submitted by partner to Red Hat for acknowledgement
• DCI program to enable partners to run CI with OpenShift on their platform
• Well documented, accessible, and up-to-date test suites for providing the test coverage of the partner
• CI includes upgrade testing of OpenShift with partner's components
• Partner component upgrade failure should not block OpenShift upgrade
• Partner code is available in repositories in the openshift org on github with an open source license compatible with OpenShift

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• [ Notes - OpenShift Everywhere - Onboarding new providers/platforms|https://www.google.com/url?q=[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M1zLG2-wmkeCWTS8omN5G8vsDKvDeZfmegsi7cCVh-U/edit?usp%3Dsharing&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1641920246517943&usg=AOvVaw2ZIl_XuE7OsSr4wCmRjOp3]] 
• OKD Installer Architecture Brainstorming Working Group Meeting Minutes
• New-Platform Documentation Working Group Meeting Minutes

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

• Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
• Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

• Core Networking Stability
• Core Networking Performance and Scale
• Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
• Core Networking UX (Observability)
• Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

• Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
• SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
• Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

• CNV
• Service Mesh
• CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.

Relevant links:

• Documentation:
  • Edge Diagnostics Scratchpad, our team's internal diagnostic guide.
  • Troubleshooting OCP networking issues - The complete guide, the SDN team's diagnostic guide.
  • Linux Performance, Brendan Gregg's guide to analyzing Linux performance issues.
  • RFC: A proper feedback loop on Alerts.
  • OpenShift Router Reload Technical Overview on Access.
  • Performance Scaling HAProxy with OpenShift on Access.
  • How to collect worker metrics to troubleshoot CPU load, memory pressure and interrupt issues and networking on worker nodes in OCP 4 on Access.
  • OpenShift Performance and Scale Knowledge Base on Mojo, results from OpenShift scalability testing.
  • Scalability and performance, OCP 4.5 documentation about the router's currently known scalability limits.
  • Scaling OpenShift Container Platform HAProxy Router, OCP 3.11 documentation about the manual performance configuration that was possible in OCP 3.
  • Timing web requests with cURL and Chrome from the Cloudflare blog.
  • tcpdump advanced filters, some useful tcpdump commands.
  • OpenShift SDN - Networking, OCP 3.11 documentation on the SDN (useful background reading).
  • Ingress Operator and Controller Status Conditions, design document for improved status condition reporting.
  • Observability tips for HAProxy, a slide deck by Willy Tarreau.
  • Interesting Traces - Out of Order versus Retransmissions, analysis using tshark.
  • The PCP Book: A Complete Documentation of Performance Co-Pilot, by Yogesh Babar.
  • Debugging kernel networking bug, brief guide to using SystemTap on RHCOS.
  • Troubleshooting throughput issues from the OCP 4.5 documentation.
  • Troubleshooting OpenShift Clusters and Workloads.
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Network Performance Tuning Guide (PDF).
  • openshift/enhancements#289 stability: point to point network check, a diagnostic built into the kube-apiserver operator.
• Diagnostic tools:
  • dropwatch to watch for packet drops.
  • ethtool to check NIC configuration.
  • iovisor/bcc: BCC - Tools for BPF-based Linux IO analysis, networking, monitoring, and more to trace and diagnose various issues in the networking stack.
  • r-curler to gather timing information about HTTP/HTTPS connections.
  • route-monitor, to monitor routes for reachability.
  • hping(3), a programmable packet generator.
  • OpenTracing / Jaeger in OpenShift.
  • node-problem-detector, a possible integration point for new diagnostics.
  • Using SystemTap by Brendan Gregg.
  • DTrace SystemTap cheatsheet (PDF).
• Visualization and more sophisticated diagnostic tools:
  • eldadru/ksniff, kubectl plugin for tcpdump & Wireshark.
  • ironcladlou/ditm, Dan's "Dan in the Middle" tool.
  • Skydive, network diagnostic and visualization tool.
  • ali, a "load testing tool capable of performing real-time analysis" with visualization.
• Testing tools:
  • stress-ng, a general stress-loading tool (CPU, filesystem, network, ...).
  • mb, the networking benchmarking tool written and used by Jiri Mencak from our Perf+Scale team.
• Case studies:
  • BZ1763206 is an example of diagnosing DNS latency/timeouts.
  • BZ1829779 Investigation details the diagnosis of route latency.
  • BZ1845545 is an example of diagnosing misconfigured DNS for an external LB.
  • Debugging network stalls on Kubernetes, from the GitHub Blog, about diagnosing Kubernetes performance issues related to ksoftirqd.

Feature Overview

• This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary

• Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

Goals

• This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

• …

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories

• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories

• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?

• Does this feature have doc impact?  

• New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact

• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.

• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?

• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?

• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?

• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.

• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

Customers are asking for improvements to the upgrade experience (both over-the-air and disconnected). This is a feature tracking epics required to get that work done.  

Goals

1. Have an option to do upgrades in more discrete steps under admin control. Specifically, these steps are: 
   • Control plane upgrade
   • Worker nodes upgrade
   • Workload enabling upgrade (i..e. Router, other components) or infra nodes
2. Better visibility into any errors during the upgrades and documentation of what they error means and how to recover. 
3. An user experience around an end-2-end back-up and restore after a failed upgrade 
4. OTA-810  - Better Documentation: 
   • Backup procedures before upgrades. 
   • More control over worker upgrades (with tagged pools between user Vs admin)
   • The kinds of pre-upgrade tests that are run, the errors that are flagged and what they mean and how to address them. 
   • Better explanation of each discrete step in upgrades, and what each CVO Operator is doing and potential errors, troubleshooting and mitigating actions.

References

• OpenShift Upgrades Customer Issues Discussion -6/22/2023
• Select Customer Experiences and Feedback on Upgrades

Feature Overview

Enable sharing ConfigMap and Secret across namespaces

Requirements

Questions to answer…

NA

Out of Scope

NA

Background, and strategic fit

Consumption of RHEL entitlements has been a challenge on OCP 4 since it moved to a cluster-based entitlement model compared to the node-based (RHEL subscription manager) entitlement mode. In order to provide a sufficiently similar experience to OCP 3, the entitlement certificates that are made available on the cluster (OCPBU-93) should be shared across namespaces in order to prevent the need for cluster admin to copy these entitlements in each namespace which leads to additional operational challenges for updating and refreshing them. 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:
 * What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
 * Does this feature have doc impact?
 * New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
 * If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
 * What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
 * How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
 * What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
 * Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
 * What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal

Increase integration of Shipwright, Tekton, Argo CD in OpenShift GitOps with OpenShift platform and related products such as ACM.

Summary (PM+lead)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-2 revealed that, in prinicipal, Pod Security Admission is possible to integrate into OpenShift while retaining SCC functionality.

This epic is about the concrete steps to enable Pod Security Admission by default in OpenShift

Motivation (PM+lead)

Goals (lead)

• Enable Pod Security Admission in "restricted" policy level by default
• Migrate existing core workloads to comply to the "restricted" pod security policy level

Non-Goals (lead)

• Other OpenShift workloads must be migrated by the individual responsible teams.

Deliverables

Proposal (lead)

Enhancement - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1010

User Stories (PM)

Dependencies (internal and external, lead)

Previous Work (lead)

Open questions (lead)

1. ...

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-authentication-operator/pull/570
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator/pull/120
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/425

Epic Goal

HyperShift provisions OpenShift clusters with externally managed control-planes. It follows a slightly different process for provisioning clusters. For example, HyperShift uses cluster API as a backend and moves all the machine management bits to the management cluster.  

Why is this important?

showing machine management/cluster auto-scaling tabs in the console is likely to confuse users and cause unnecessary side effects. 

Definition of Done

• MachineConfig and MachineConfigPool should not be present, they should be either removed or hidden when the cluster is spawned using HyperShift. 
• Cluster Settings show say the control plane is externally managed and be read-only.
• Cluster Settings -> Configuration resources should be read-only, maybe hide the tab
• Some resources should go in an allowlist. Most will be hidden
• Review getting started steps

See Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

Setup / Testing

It's based on the SERVER_FLAG controlPlaneTopology being set to External is really the driving factor here; this can be done in one of two ways:

• Locally via a Bridge Variable, export BRIDGE_CONTROL_PLANE_TOPOLOGY_MODE="External"
• Locally / OnCluster via modifying the window.SERVER_FLAGS.controlPlaneTopology to External in the dev tools

To test work related to cluster upgrade process, use a 4.10.3 cluster set on the candidate-4.10 upgrade channel using 4.11 frontend code.

Epic Goal

• Ensure that OCP Admin console can enable dark mode
• Mechanism for switching between light/dark mode, based on user preferences or User Settings in OCP
• Identify changes needed for OCP console's dynamic plugins
• Status as we work through the stories: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18ib0A9ZtSYo1e2aOtM2LtZcsNFs1aRCHXx6NAPsIAso/edit#

Why is this important?

• So the UX satisfies the current trands, where dark mode is becoming a standard for modern services.  

Acceptance Criteria

• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode based on `prefers-color-scheme` media query
• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode selected in the User Setting page
• Create an followup epic/story for and listing and tracking changes needed in OCP console's dynamic plugins

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. PatternFly - Dark mode PF variables

Previous Work (Optional):

1. Mike Coker has worked on a POC from the PF point of view on both the admin and dev console, and the screenshot results are listed below along with the repo branch. Also listed is a document covering some of the common issues found when putting together the admin console POC. https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
   Background POC work completed for reference:

PatternFly Dark Theme Handbook: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mRYEfUoOjTsSt7hiqjbeplqhfo3_rVDO0QqMj2p67pw/edit

Admin Console -> Workloads & Pods

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BoOpXpX96_uNUhVJiEqGUCZ-JMYh1A78fXJhk3H86K8/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
• Github PR for Dark Theme WIP by Vikram: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10947{}

Dev Console -> Gotcha pages: Observe Dashboard and Metrics, Add, Pipelines: builder, list, log, and run

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13jagAf_JEu82hd_KpEHRmj25xCEqwImWpNufzVopuUs/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10815
• Evaluation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fBCPPb4Z1sqUDKgQkpueGe8VQZo4pBUA9PV4vnFCnDw/edit#gid=0

Open questions::

1. Who should be responsible for updating DynamicPlugins to be able to render in dark mode?

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

• Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Goal

• Add the ability for users to select supported but not recommended updates.
• Refine workflow when both "upgradeable=false" and "supported-but-not-recommended" updates occur

Background
RFE: for 4.10, Cincinnati and the cluster-version operator are adding conditional updates (a.k.a. targeted edge blocking): https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-267

High-level plans in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#update-client-support-for-the-enhanced-schema

Example of what the oc adm upgrade UX will be in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#cluster-administrator.

The oc implementation landed via https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/961.

Design

• Use case 01: "supported but not recommended" occurs to the latest version:
  • Add an info icon next to the version on update path with a pop-over to explain about why updating to this version is supported, but not recommended and a link to known risks
  • Identify the difference in "recommended" versions, "supported but not recommended" versions, and "blocked" versions (upgradeable=false) in the + more modal.
  • The latest version is pre-selected in the dropdown in the update modal with an inline alert to inform users about supported-but-not-recommended version with link to known risks. Users can choose to update to another recommended versions, update to a supported-but-not-recommended one, or wait.
  • The "recommended" and "supported but not recommended" updates are separated in the dropdown.
  • If a user selects a "recommended" update, the inline alert disappears.
• Use case 02: When both "upgradeable=false" and "supported but not recommended" occur:
  • Add an alert banner to explain why users shouldn’t update to the latest version and link to how to resolve on the cluster settings details page. Users have the options to resolve the issue, update to a patch version, or wait.
  • If users open the update modal without resolving the "upgradeable=false" issue, the next recommended version is pre-selected. An expandable link "View blocked versions (#)" is included under the dropdown to show "upgradeable=false" versions with resolve link.
  • If users resolve the "upgradeable=false" issue, the cluster settings page will change to use case 01

• • Question: Priority on changing the upgradeable=false alert banner in update modal and blocked versions in dropdown

See design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nja4whdsI5dKmQNS_rXyN8IGtRXDJ8gXuU_eSxBLMIY/edit#

See marvel: https://marvelapp.com/prototype/h3ehaa4/screen/86077932

Epic Goal

• Add telemetry so that we know how image stream features are used.

Why is this important?

• We have a long standing epic to create image streams v2. We need to better understand how image streams are used today.

Scenarios

1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

• Make the image registry distributed across availability zones.

Why is this important?

• The registry should be highly available and zone failsafe.

Scenarios

1. As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Pod's topologySpreadConstraints

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/730
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Goal

Remove Jenkins from the OCP Payload.

Problem

• Jenkins images are "non-trival in size, impact experience around OCP payloads
• Security advisories cannot be handled once, but against all actively supported OCP releases, adding to response time for handling said advisories
• Some customers may now want to upgrade Jenkins as OCP upgrades (making this configurable is more ideal)

Why is this important

• This is an engineering motivated item to reduce costs so we have more cycles for strategic work
• Aside from the team itself, top level OCP architects want this to reduce the image size, improve general OCP upgrade experience
• Sends a mix message with respect to what is startegic CI/CI when Jenkins is baked into OCP, but Tekton/Pipelines is an add-on, day 2 install sort of thing

Dependencies (internal and external)

See epic linking - need alternative non payload image available to provide relatively seamless migration

Also, the EP for this is approved and merged at https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/builds/remove-jenkins-payload.md

Estimate (xs, s, m, l, xl, xxl):

Questions:

• in addition to needing the CPaaS Image available first, have we confirmed the "deprecate first, then remove" requirements?  Per grooming we've assigned Rob Gormley the task https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JKNS-274 for tracking this down.  I will be reaching out to Ben Parees (he is currently on vacation) to confirm from an OCP staff engineer / architect perspective if his approval of https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/841 is sufficient signoff from that end.

       PARTIAL ANSWER ^^:  confirmed with Ben Parees in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C014MHHKUSF/p1646683621293839 that EP merging is currently sufficient OCP "technical leadership" approval.

Previous work

Customers

assuming none

Epic Goal

• Remove this UI from our stack that we cannot support.

Why is this important?

• Reduce support burden.
• Remove Bugzilla burden of addressing continuous CVEs found in this project.

Acceptance Criteria

• All Prometheus upstream UI links are removed
• Related documentation is updated
• Ports/routes etc configured to expose access to this UI are removed such that no configuration we provide enables access to this UI or its codepaths.
• There is no reason any CVEs found in this UI would ever require intervention by the Monitoring Team.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Make the Prometheus Targets information available in Console UI (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1079)

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

When users configure CMO to interact with systems outside of an OpenShift cluster, we want to provide an easy way to add the cluster ID to the data send.

Why is this important?

Technically this can be achieved today, by adding an identifying label to the remote_write configuration for a given cluster. The operator adding the remote_write integration needs to take care that the label is unique over the managed fleet of clusters. This however adds management complexity. Any given cluster already has a pseudo-unique datum, that can be used for this purpose.

• Starting in 4.9 we support the Prometheus remote_write feature to send metric data to a storage integration outside of the cluster similar to our own Telemetry service.
• In Telemetry we already use the cluster ID to distinguish the various clusters.
• For users of remote_write this could add an easy way to add such distinguishing information.

Scenarios

1. An organisation with multiple OpenShift clusters want to store their metric data centralized in a dedicated system and use remote_write in all their clusters to send this data. When querying their centralized storage, metadata (here a label) is needed to separate the data of the various clusters.
2. Service providers who manage multiple clusters for multiple customers via a centralized storage system need distinguishing metadata too. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSD-6573 for example

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• Document how to use this feature

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. none

Previous Work (Optional):

1. none

Open questions::

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Implementation proposal:

Expose a flag in the CMO configuration, that is false by default (keeps backward compatibility) and when set to true will add the _id label to a remote_write configuration. More specifically it will be added to the top of a remote_write relabel_config list via the replace action. This will add the label as expect, but additionally a user could alter this label in a later relabel config to suit any specific requirements (say rename the label or add additional information to the value).
The location of this flag is the remote_write Spec, so this can be set for individual remote_write configurations.

Epic Goal

• Offer the option to double the scrape intervals for CMO controlled ServiceMonitors in single node deployments
• Alternatively automatically double the same scrape intervals if CMO detects an SNO setup

The potential target ServiceMonitors are:

• kubelet
• kube-state-metrics
• node-exporter
• etcd
• openshift-state-metrics

Why is this important?

• Reduce CPU usage in SNO setups
• Specifically doubling the scrape interval is important because:

1. we are confident that this will have the least chance to interfere with existing rules. We typically have rate queries over the last 2 minutes (no shorter time window). With 30 second scrape intervals (the current default) this gives us 4 samples in any 2 minute window. rate needs at least 2 samples to work, we want another 2 for failure tolerance. Doubling the scrape interval will still give us 2 samples in most 2 minute windows. If a scrape fails, a few rule evaluations might fail intermittently.
2. We expect a measureable reduction of CPU resources (see previous work)

Scenarios

1. RAN deployments (Telco Edge) are SNO deployments. In these setups a full CMO deployment is often not needed and the default setup consumes too many resources. OpenShift as a whole has only very limited CPU cycles available and too many cycles are spend on Monitoring

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1569

Open questions:

1. Whether doubling some scrape intervals reduces CPU usage to fit into the assigned budget

Non goals

• Allow arbitrarily long scrape intervals. This will interfere with alert and recoring rules
• Implement a global override to scrape intervals.

Problem:

This epic is mainly focused on the 4.10 Release QE activities

Goal:

1. Identify the scenarios for automation
2. Segregate the test Scenarios into smoke, Regression and other user stories
a. Update the https://docs.jboss.org/display/ODC/Automation+Status+Report
3. Align with layered operator teams for updating scripts
3. Work closely with dev team for epic automation
4. Create the automation scripts using cypress
5. Implement CI for nightly builds
6. Execute scripts on sprint basis

Why is it important?

To the track the QE progress at one place in 4.10 Release Confluence page

Use cases:

1. <case>

Acceptance criteria:

1. <criteria>

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Goal:

This epic covers a number of customer requests(RFEs) as well as increases usability.

Why is it important?

Customer satisfaction as well as improved usability.

Acceptance Criteria

1. Allow user to re-arrange the resources which have ben added to nav by the user
2. Improved user experience (form based experience)
   1. Form based editing of Routes
   2. Form based creation and editing of Config Maps
   3. Form base creation of Deployments
3. Improved discovery
   1. Include Share my project on the Add page to increase discoverability
   2. NS Helm Chart Repo
      1. Add tile to Add page for discoverability
      2. Provide a form driven creation experience
      3. User should be able to switch back and forth from Form/YAML
      4. change the intro text to the below & have the link in the intro text bring up the full page form
         1. Browse for charts that help manage complex installations and upgrades. Cluster administrators can customize the content made available in the catalog. Alternatively, developers can try to configure their own custom Helm Chart repository.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

None

Exploration:

Miro board from Epic Exploration

Problem:

Currently we are only able to get limited telemetry from the Dev Sandbox, but not from any of our managed clusters or on prem clusters.

Goals:

1. Enable gathering segment telemetry whenever cluster telemetry is enabled on OSD clusters
2. Have our OSD clusters opt into telemetry by default
3. Work with PM & UX to identify additional metrics to capture in addition to what we have enabled currently on Sandbox.
4. Ability to get a single report from woopra across all of our Sandbox and OSD clusters.
5. Be able to generate a report including metrics of a single cluster or all clusters of a certain type ( sandbox, or OSD)

Why is it important?

In order to improve properly analyze usage and the user experience, we need to be able to gather as much data as possible.

Goal:
Enhance oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) with heterogeneous architecture support

Epic Goal

• Update image registry dependencies (Kubernetes and OpenShift) to the latest versions.

Why is this important?

• New versions usually bring improvements that are needed by the registry and help with getting updates for z-stream.

Scenarios

1. As an OpenShift engineer, I want my components to use the versions of dependencies, so that they get fixes for known issues and can be easily updated in z-stream.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Kubernetes 1.24

Previous Work (Optional):

1. IR-210

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>

Epic Goal

• Provide a dedicated dashboard for NVIDIA GPU usage visualization in the OpenShift Console.

Why is this important?

• Customers that use GPUs in their clusters usually have the GPU workloads as the main purpose of their cluster. As such, it makes much more sense to have the details about the usage they are doing of GPGPU resources AND CPU/RAM rather than just CPU/RAM

Scenarios

1. As an admin of a cluster dedicated to data science, I want to quickly find out how much of my very costly resources are currently in use and if things are getting queued due to lack of resources

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. The NVIDIA GPU Operator must export to prometheus the relevant data

Open questions::

1. Will NVIDIA agree to these extra data exports in their GPU Operator?

I asked Zvonko Kaiser and he seemed open to it. I need to confirm with Shiva Merla

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

• Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

• OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
• Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
• Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
• Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

• Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
• When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
• User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
• Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1272

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1821

Description of problem:

When adding new nodes to the existing cluster, the newly allocated node-subnet can be overlapped with the existing node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openshift 4.10.30

How reproducible:

It's quite hard to reproduce but  there is a possibility it can happen any time. 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a OVN dual-stack cluster
2. add nodes to the existing cluster
3. check the allocated node subnet 

Actual results:

Some newly added nodes have the same node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP as some existing nodes.

Expected results:

Should have duplicated node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP

Additional info:

Additional info can be found at the case 03329155 and the must-gather attached(comment #1) 

% omg logs ovnkube-master-v8crc -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes -c ovnkube-master | grep '2022-09-30T06:42:50.857'
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857031565Z W0930 06:42:50.857020       1 master.go:1422] Did not find any logical switches with other-config
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857112441Z I0930 06:42:50.857099       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node worker01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857122455Z I0930 06:42:50.857105       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.129.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:a::/64] on Node oam04.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857130289Z I0930 06:42:50.857122       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node worker01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857140773Z I0930 06:42:50.857132       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.129.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:a::/64"]}] on node oam04.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857166726Z I0930 06:42:50.857156       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:5::/64] on Node oam01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857157       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857167       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:5::/64"]}] on node oam01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857185257Z I0930 06:42:50.857157       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.6.0/23 fd02:0:0:d::/64] on Node call03.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857192996Z I0930 06:42:50.857183       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857200017Z I0930 06:42:50.857190       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.6.0/23","fd02:0:0:d::/64"]}] on node call03.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857282717Z I0930 06:42:50.857258       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.130.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:7::/64] on Node call01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857304886Z I0930 06:42:50.857293       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.130.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:7::/64"]}] on node call01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857338896Z I0930 06:42:50.857314       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:9::/64] on Node f501.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857349485Z I0930 06:42:50.857329       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:8::/64] on Node call02.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857354       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:9::/64"]}] on node f501.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857361       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:8::/64"]}] on node call02.ss1.samsung.local

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1415

Description of problem:

With every pod update we are executing a mutate operation to add the pod port to the port group or add the pod IP to an address set. This functionally doesn't hurt, since mutate will not add duplicate values to the same set. However, this is bad for performance. For example, with a 730 network policies affecting a pod, and issuing 7 pod updates would result in over 5k transactions.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1447

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6671. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3228. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
While starting a Pipelinerun using UI, and in the process of providing the values on "Start Pipeline" , the IBM Power Customer (Deepak Shetty from IBM) has tried creating credentials under "Advanced options" with "Image Registry Credentials" (Authenticaion type). When the IBM Customer verified the credentials from  Secrets tab (in Workloads) , the secret was found in broken state. Screenshot of the broken secret is attached. 

The issue has been observed on OCP4.8, OCP4.9 and OCP4.10.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12569

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5191. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5164. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

It looks like the ODC doesn't register KNATIVE_SERVING and KNATIVE_EVENTING flags. Those are based on KnativeServing and KnativeEventing CRs, but they are looking for v1alpha1 version of those: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/f72519fdf2267ad91cc0aa51467113cc36423a49/frontend/packages/knative-plugin/console-extensions.json#L6-L8
This PR https://github.com/openshift-knative/serverless-operator/pull/1695 moved the CRs to v1beta1, and that breaks that ODC discovery.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift 4.8, Serverless Operator 1.27

Additional info:

https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CHGU4P8UU/p1671634903447019

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12403

Description of problem:

When running node-density (245 pods/node) on a 120 node cluster, we see that there is a huge spike (~22s) in Avg pod-latency. When the spike occurs we see all the ovnkube-master pods go through a restart. 

The restart happens because of (ovnkube-master pods)

2022-08-10T04:04:44.494945179Z panic: reflect: call of reflect.Value.Len on ptr Value

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-09-114621

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run node-density on a 120 node cluster

Actual results:

Spike observed in pod-latency graph ~22s

Expected results:

Steady pod-latency graph ~4s

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1266

As discussed previously by email, customer support case 03211616 requests a means to use the latest patch version of a given X.Y golang via imagestreams, with the blocking issue being the lack of X.Y tags for the go-toolset containers on RHCC.

The latter has now been fixed with the latest version also getting a :1.17 tag, and the imagestream source has been modified accordingly, which will get picked up in 4.12. We can now fix this in 4.11.z by backporting this to the imagestream files bundled in cluster-samples-operator.

/cc Ian Watson Feny Mehta

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/467

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6766. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 (OCPBUGSM-44070) to backport this issue.

Description of problem:
"Delete dependent objects of this resource" is a bit of confusing for some users because when creating the Application in Dev console not only the deployment but also IS, route, svc, secret objects will be created as well. When deleting the Application (in fact it is deployment), there is an option called "Delete dependent objects of this resource" and some users might think this means the IS, route, svc and any other objects which are created alongside with the deployment will be deleted as well

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create Application in Dev console
2. Delete the deployment
3. Check "Delete dependent objects of this resource"

Actual results:
Only deployment will be deleted and IS, svc, route will not be deleted

Expected results:
We either change the description of this option, or we really delete IS, svc, route and any other objects created under this Application.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12532

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10514. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10221. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5469. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

When changing channels it's possible that multiple new conditional update risks will need to be evaluated. For instance, a cluster running 4.10.34 in a 4.10 channel today only has to evaluate `OpenStackNodeCreationFails` but when the channel is changed to a 4.11 channel multiple new risks require evaluation and the evaluation of new risks is throttled at one every 10 minutes. This means if there are three new risks it may take up to 30 minutes after the channel has changed for the full set of conditional updates to be computed. This leads to a perception that no update paths are recommended because most will not wait 30 minutes, they expect immediate feedback.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.z, 4.11.z, 4.12, 4.13

How reproducible:

100% 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install 4.10.34
2. Switch from stable-4.10 to stable-4.11
3. 

Actual results:

Observe no recommended updates for 10-20 minutes because all available paths to 4.11 have a risk associated with them

Expected results:

Risks are computed in a timely manner for an interactive UX, lets say < 10s

Additional info:

This was intentional in the design, we didn't want risks to continuously re-evaluate or overwhelm the monitoring stack, however we didn't anticipate that we'd have long standing pile of risks and realize how confusing the user experience would be.

We intend to work around this in the deployed fleet by converting older risks from `type: promql` to `type: Always` avoiding the evaluation period but preserving the notification. While this may lead customers to believe they're exposed to a risk they may not be, as long as the set of outstanding risks to the latest version is limited to no more than one it's likely no one will notice. All 4.10 and 4.11 clusters currently have a clear path toward relatively recent 4.10.z or 4.11.z with no more than one risk to be evaluated.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/915

Created attachment 1905034 [details]
Plugin page with error

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a plugin with a page that has a runtime error. (Demo Plugin -> Dynamic Nav 1 currently has an error for me, but you can reproduce by editing any plugin and introducing an error.)
2. Observe the "something went wrong" error message.
3. Navigate to any other page (e.g. Workloads -> Pods)

Expected result:

The pods page is displayed.

Action result:

The error message persists. There is no way to clear except to refresh the browser.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11968

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator/pull/216

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4238. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3883. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
While doing a PerfScale test of we noticed that the ovnkube pods are not being spread out evenly among the available workers. Instead they are all stacking on a few until they fill up the available allocatable ebs volumes (25 in the case of m5 instances that we see here).

An example from partway through our 80 hosted cluster test when there were ~30 hosted clusters created/in progress

There are 24 workers available:

```

$ for i in `oc get nodes l node-role.kubernetes.io/worker=,node-role.kubernetes.io/infra!=,node-role.kubernetes.io/workload!= | egrep -v "NAME" | awk '{ print $1 }'`;    do  echo $i `oc describe node $i | grep -v openshift | grep ovnkube -c`; done
ip-10-0-129-227.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-136-22.us-west-2.compute.internal 25
ip-10-0-136-29.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-147-248.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-150-147.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-154-207.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-156-0.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-157-1.us-west-2.compute.internal 4
ip-10-0-160-253.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-161-30.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-164-98.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-168-245.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-170-103.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-188-169.us-west-2.compute.internal 25
ip-10-0-188-194.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-191-51.us-west-2.compute.internal 5
ip-10-0-192-10.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-193-200.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-193-27.us-west-2.compute.internal 7
ip-10-0-199-1.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-203-161.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-204-40.us-west-2.compute.internal 23
ip-10-0-220-164.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-222-59.us-west-2.compute.internal 0

```

This is running quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.11.11-x86_64 for the hosted clusters and the hypershift operator is quay.io/hypershift/hypershift-operator:4.11 on a 4.11.9 management cluster

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1702

• https://github.com/openshift/multus-cni/pull/152

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3418

This is a backport from https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-1044

Description of problem:

https://github.com/prometheus/node_exporter/issues/2299

The node exporter pod when ran on a bare metal worker using an AMD EPYC CPU crashes and fails to start up and crashes with the following error message.    State:       Waiting
      Reason:    CrashLoopBackOff
    Last State:  Terminated
      Reason:    Error
      Message:   05.145Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=tapestats
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.145Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=textfile
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.145Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=thermal_zone
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=time
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=timex
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=udp_queues
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=uname
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=vmstat
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=xfs
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:115 level=info collector=zfs
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=node_exporter.go:199 level=info msg="Listening on" address=127.0.0.1:9100
ts=2022-09-07T20:25:05.146Z caller=tls_config.go:195 level=info msg="TLS is disabled." http2=false
panic: "node_rapl_package-0-die-0_joules_total" is not a valid metric name

 Apparently this is a known issue (See Github link) and was fixed in a later upstream.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0

How reproducible:

Every-time 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Provision a bare metal node using an AMD EPYC CPU
2. Node-exporter pods that try to start on the nodes will crash with error message

Actual results:

Node-exporter pods cannot run on the new nodes 

Expected results:

Node exporter pods should be able to start up and run like on any other node

Additional info:

As mentioned above this issue was tracked and fixed in a later upstream of node-exporter

https://github.com/prometheus/node_exporter/issues/2299

Would we be able to get the fixed version pulled for 4.11?

• https://github.com/openshift/node_exporter/pull/108

Description of problem:

Setting disableNetworkDiagnostics: true does not persist when network-operator pod gets re-created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.0-rc.0

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. $ oc patch network.operator.openshift.io/cluster --patch '{"spec":{"disableNetworkDiagnostics":true}}' --type=merge
network.operator.openshift.io/cluster patched

2. $ oc -n openshift-network-operator delete pods network-operator-9b68954c6-bclx6
pod "network-operator-9b68954c6-bclx6" deleted

3. $ oc get network.operator.openshift.io cluster -o json | jq .spec.disableNetworkDiagnostics
false

Actual results:
disableNetworkDiagnostics set to false, not set to true as configured in step 1

Expected results:
disableNetworkDiagnostics set to true

Additional info:

Attaching must-gather.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1530

Description of problem:

We need to have admin-ack in 4.11 so that admins can check the deprecated APIs and approve when they move to 4.12.Refer https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for  more information. As planned we want to add the admin-ack around 4.12 feature freeze. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a cluster in 4.11. 
2. Run an application which uses the deprecated API. See https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for more information.
3. Upgrade to 4.12

Actual results:

The upgrade happens without asking the admin to confirm that the worksloads do not use the deprecated APIs.

Expected results:

Upgrade should wait for the admin-ack.

Additional info:

We had admin-acks in the past too e.g. https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.9/updating/updating-cluster-prepare.html#update-preparing-migrate_updating-cluster-prepare

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/836

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2073220](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073220). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem:

https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/security/audit-log-policy-config.html#about-audit-log-profiles_audit-log-policy-config

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.*

How reproducible: always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set audit profile to WriteRequestBodies
2. Wait for api server rollout to complete
3. tail -f /var/log/kube-apiserver/audit.log | grep routes/status

Actual results:

Write events to routes/status are recorded at the RequestResponse level, which often includes keys and certificates.

Expected results:

Events involving routes should always be recorded at the Metadata level, per the documentation at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/security/audit-log-policy-config.html#about-audit-log-profiles_audit-log-policy-config

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1422
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-openshift-apiserver-operator/pull/513

Just like kube proxy, ovnk should expose port 10256 on every node, so that cloud LBs can send health checks and know which nodes are available. This is relevant for services with externalTrafficPolicy=Cluster.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1594

• https://github.com/openshift/builder/pull/339

Description of problem:

When queried dns hostname from certain pod on the certain node, responded from random coredns pod, not prefer local one. Is it expected result ?

# In OCP v4.8.13 case
// Ran dig command on the certain node which is running the following test-7cc4488d48-tqc4m pod.
sh-4.4# while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done
:
07:16:33 :172.217.175.238
07:16:34 :172.217.175.238 <--- Refreshed the upstream result
07:16:36 :142.250.207.46
07:16:37 :142.250.207.46

// The dig results is matched with the running node one as you can see the above one.
$ oc rsh  test-7cc4488d48-tqc4m bash -c 'while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done'
:
07:16:35 :172.217.175.238 
07:16:36 :172.217.175.238 <--- At the same time, the pod dig result is also refreshed.
07:16:37 :142.250.207.46
07:16:38 :142.250.207.46


But in v4.10 case, in contrast, the dns query result is various and responded randomly regardless local dns results on the node as follows.

# In OCP v4.10.23 case, pod's response from DNS services are not consistent.
$ oc rsh test-848fcf8ddb-zrcbx  bash -c 'while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done'
07:23:00 :142.250.199.110
07:23:01 :142.250.207.46
07:23:02 :142.250.207.46
07:23:03 :142.250.199.110
07:23:04 :142.250.199.110
07:23:05 :172.217.161.78

# Even though the node which is running the pod keep responding the same IP...
sh-4.4# while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done
07:23:00 :172.217.161.78
07:23:01 :172.217.161.78
07:23:02 :172.217.161.78
07:23:03 :172.217.161.78
07:23:04 :172.217.161.78
07:23:05 :172.217.161.78

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

v4.10.23 (ROSA)
SDN: OpenShiftSDN

How reproducible:

You can always reproduce this issue using "dig google.com" from both any pod and the node the pod running according to the above "Description" details.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Run any usual pod, and check which node the pod is running on.
2. Run dig google.com on the pod and the node.
3. Check the IP is consistent with the running node each other. 

Actual results:

The response IPs are not consistent and random IP is responded.

Expected results:

The response IP is kind of consistent, and aware of prefer local dns.

Additional info:

This issue affects EgressNetworkPolicy dnsName feature.

• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/466
• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/456

Description of problem:

When the user installs a helm chart, the dropdown to select a specific version is always disabled. Also for helm charts that can upgraded or downgraded after installation. For example the nodejs helm chart.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

At least 4.11, maybe all versions, but a backport to 4.11 is fine

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Switch to developer perspective
2. Navigate to Add > Helm chart
3. Select the Nodejs helm chart
4. Try to select another version
..
When the user installs the not selectable version and edit the helm chart there is another version to selec 

Actual results:

The version is not selectable.

Expected results:

The version should be selectable.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12135

Description of problem:

When creating a pod with an additional network that contains a `spec.config.ipam.exclude` range, any address within the excluded range is still iterated while searching for a suitable IP candidate. As a result, pod creation times out when large exclude ranges are used.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

with big exclude ranges, 100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create network-attachment-definition with a large range:

$ cat <<EOF| oc apply -f -       
apiVersion: k8s.cni.cncf.io/v1                                            
kind: NetworkAttachmentDefinition
metadata:
  name: nad-w-excludes
spec:
  config: |-
    {
      "cniVersion": "0.3.1",
      "name": "macvlan-net",
      "type": "macvlan",
      "master": "ens3",
      "mode": "bridge",
      "ipam": {
         "type": "whereabouts",
         "range": "fd43:01f1:3daa:0baa::/64",
         "exclude": [ "fd43:01f1:3daa:0baa::/100" ],
         "log_file": "/tmp/whereabouts.log",
         "log_level" : "debug"
      }
    }
EOF
2. create a pod with the network attached:

$ cat <<EOF|oc apply -f -
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: pod-with-exclude-range
  annotations:
    k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks: nad-w-excludes
spec:
  containers:
  - name: pod-1
    image: openshift/hello-openshift
EOF

3. check pod status, event log and whereabouts logs after a while: 

$ oc get pods
NAME                        READY   STATUS              RESTARTS   AGE
pod-with-exclude-range      0/1     ContainerCreating   0          2m23s

$ oc get events
<...>
6m39s       Normal    Scheduled                                    pod/pod-with-exclude-range                   Successfully assigned default/pod-with-exclude-range to <worker-node>
6m37s       Normal    AddedInterface                               pod/pod-with-exclude-range                   Add eth0 [10.129.2.49/23] from openshift-sdn
2m39s       Warning   FailedCreatePodSandBox                       pod/pod-with-exclude-range                   Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = context deadline exceeded

$ oc debug node/<worker-node> - tail /host/tmp/whereabouts.log
Starting pod/<worker-node>-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
2022-10-27T14:14:50Z [debug] Finished leader election
2022-10-27T14:14:50Z [debug] IPManagement: {fd43:1f1:3daa:baa::1 ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} , <nil>
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Used defaults from parsed flat file config @ /etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/whereabouts.d/whereabouts.conf
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] ADD - IPAM configuration successfully read: {Name:macvlan-net Type:whereabouts Routes:[] Datastore:kubernetes Addresses:[] OmitRanges:[fd43:01f1:3daa:0baa::/80] DNS: {Nameservers:[] Domain: Search:[] Options:[]} Range:fd43:1f1:3daa:baa::/64 RangeStart:fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:: RangeEnd:<nil> GatewayStr: EtcdHost: EtcdUsername: EtcdPassword:********* EtcdKeyFile: EtcdCertFile: EtcdCACertFile: LeaderLeaseDuration:1500 LeaderRenewDeadline:1000 LeaderRetryPeriod:500 LogFile:/tmp/whereabouts.log LogLevel:debug OverlappingRanges:true SleepForRace:0 Gateway:<nil> Kubernetes: {KubeConfigPath:/etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/whereabouts.d/whereabouts.kubeconfig K8sAPIRoot:} ConfigurationPath:PodName:pod-with-exclude-range PodNamespace:default} 
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Beginning IPAM for ContainerID: f4ffd0e07d6c1a2b6ffb0fa29910c795258792bb1a1710ff66f6b48fab37af82
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Started leader election
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] OnStartedLeading() called
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Elected as leader, do processing
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] IPManagement - mode: 0 / containerID:f4ffd0e07d6c1a2b6ffb0fa29910c795258792bb1a1710ff66f6b48fab37af82 / podRef: default/pod-with-exclude-range
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] IterateForAssignment input >> ip: fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:: | ipnet: {fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} | first IP: fd43:1f1:3daa:baa::1 | last IP: fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff

Actual results:

Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = context deadline exceeded

Expected results:

additional network gets attached to the pod

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/whereabouts-cni/pull/104

The two modules that are auto generated for the CLI docs need to add ":_content-type: REFERENCE" to the top of the files. Update the doc generation templates to add these.

• https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1072

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12174

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3419

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5761. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5458. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
reported in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C027U68LP/p1673010878672479

Description of problem:

Hey guys, I have a openshift cluster that was upgraded to version 4.9.58 from version 4.8. After the upgrade was done, the etcd pod on master1 isn't coming up and is crashlooping. and it gives the following error: {"level":"fatal","ts":"2023-01-06T12:12:58.709Z","caller":"etcdmain/etcd.go:204","msg":"discovery failed","error":"wal: max entry size limit exceeded, recBytes: 13279, fileSize(313430016) - offset(313418480) - padBytes(1) = entryLimit(11535)","stacktrace":"go.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3/etcdmain.startEtcdOrProxyV2\n\t/remote-source/cachito-gomod-with-deps/app/server/etcdmain/etcd.go:204\ngo.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3/etcdmain.Main\n\t/remote-source/cachito-gomod-with-deps/app/server/etcdmain/main.go:40\nmain.main\n\t/remote-source/cachito-gomod-with-deps/app/server/main.go:32\nruntime.main\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/proc.go:225"}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/etcd/pull/178

This is a clone of BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117374 which fixed 4.12

 
Description of problem:
OCP 4.11 introduced the `restricted-v2` SecurityContextConstraint as the default binding for all authenticated users. When a Pod that would have normally be admitted successfully using the `restricted` SCC, but cannot be admitted using a `restricted-v2` SCC, it's not clear to the customer that the problem is related to the default SCC changing from restricted to restricted-v2.

Suggestion is to generate an additional message for this specific use case that makes it clear to customers that they have a workload that is not compatible with restricted-v2.

Example message:
Error creating: pods "nginx-ingress-controller-75bffcfdf8-" is forbidden: the pod fails to validate against the default `restricted-v2` security context constraint, but would validate successfully against the `restricted` security context constraint.

The goal of such a message is to give the customer a breadcrumb that the `restricted-v2` SCC is activated and set as the default, which they may have not been aware of. This would give them a way to find alternatives, such as changing the global default, fixing the application or assigning the `restricted` SCC to the Namespace or ServiceAccount.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install OCP 4.11.0
2. Create a deployment with a podtemplate with .spec.containers[*].securityContext.allowPrivigeEscalation = true in a new namespace

Actual results:
The pod will fail to be admitted with an error such as:

Warning FailedCreate 27m (x25 over 76m) replicaset-controller Error creating: pods "nginx-ingress-controller-75bffcfdf8-" is forbidden: unable to validate against any security context constraint: [provider "anyuid": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, spec.containers[0].securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation: Invalid value: true: Allowing privilege escalation for containers is not allowed, provider "restricted": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "nonroot-v2": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "nonroot": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "noobaa": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "noobaa-endpoint": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostmount-anyuid": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "machine-api-termination-handler": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostnetwork-v2": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostnetwork": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostaccess": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "rook-ceph": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "node-exporter": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "rook-ceph-csi": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "privileged": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount]

Expected results:
Add an additional or replacement error message when there is no SCC assignment other than `restricted-v2` AND `restricted` would have worked:

Error creating: pods "nginx-ingress-controller-75bffcfdf8-" is forbidden: the pod fails to validate against the default `restricted-v2` security context constraint, but would validate successfully against the `restricted` security context constraint.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1459

• https://github.com/openshift/image-registry/pull/343

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7458. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

- After upgrading to OCP 4.10.41, thanos-ruler-user-workload-1 in the openshift-user-workload-monitoring namespace is consistently being created and deleted.
- We had to scale down the Prometheus operator multiple times so that the upgrade is considered as successful.
- This fix is temporary. After some time it appears again and Prometheus operator needs to be scaled down and up again.
- The issue is present on all clusters in this customer environment which are upgraded to 4.10.41.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

N/A, I wasn't able to reproduce the issue.

Steps to Reproduce:

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/prometheus-operator/pull/218

Changelog between 3.5.5 and 3.5.4:
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-3.5.md#v355-tbd

Changelog between 3.5.3 and 3.5.4:
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-3.5.md#v354-2022-04-24

• https://github.com/openshift/etcd/pull/155

Description of problem: Backport owners for 4.11 (only)

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11936

Description of problem:
Follow-up of: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2988

This failure is perma-failing in the e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway jobs.

Example: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway/1597574181430497280
Search CI: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=when+using+openshift+ovn-kubernetes+should+ensure+egressfirewall+is+created&maxAge=336h&context=1&type=junit&name=e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job
Sippy: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/jobs/4.13/analysis?filters=%7B%22items%22%3A%5B%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22name%22%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22equals%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway%22%7D%5D%7D

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12,4.13

How reproducible:

Every time

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup dualstack KinD cluster
2. Create egress fw policy with spec
Spec:
  Egress:
    To:
      Cidr Selector:  0.0.0.0/0
    Type:             Deny
3. create a pod and ping to 1.1.1.1

Actual results:

Egress policy does not block flows to external IP

Expected results:

Egress policy blocks flows to external IP

Additional info:

It seems mixing ip4 and ip6 operands in ACL matchs doesnt work

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1507

Description of problem:

During ocp multinode spoke cluster creation agent provisioning is stuck on "configuring" because machineConfig service is crashing on the node.
After restarting the service still fails with 

Can't read link "/var/lib/containers/storage/overlay/l/V2OP2CCVMKSOHK2XICC546DUCG" because it does not exist. A storage corruption might have occurred, attempting to recreate the missing symlinks. It might be best wipe the storage to avoid further errors due to storage corruption. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Podman 4.0.2 + 

How reproducible:

sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. deploy multinode spoke (ipxe + boot order )
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 agents in done state and 1 is in "configuring"

Expected results:

all agents are in "done" state

Additional info:

issue mentioned in https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/14003

Fix: https://github.com/containers/storage/issues/1136

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3319

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-224. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
OCP v4.9.31 cluster didn't have the $search domain in /etc/resolv.conf, which was there in the v4.8.29 OCP cluster. This was observed in all the nodes of the v4.9.31 cluster.
~~~
OpenShift 4.9.31
sh-4.4# cat /etc/resolv.conf

1. Generated by KNI resolv prepender NM dispatcher script
   nameserver 172.xx.xx.xx
   nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
   nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
2. nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx

OpenShift 4.8.29

1. Generated by KNI resolv prepender NM dispatcher script
   search sepia.lab.iad2.dc.paas.redhat.com
   nameserver 172.xx.xx.xx
   nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
   nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
2. nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
   ~~~

ENV: OpenStack IAD2, IPI installation. Connected cluster.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP v4.9.31

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install IPI cluster on OpenStack IAD2 platform having cluster version 4.9.31
2. Debug to any of the node(master/worker)
3. Check and confirm the missing search domain on all nodes of the cluster.

Actual results:
The search domain was missing when checked in `/etc/resolv.conf` file on all nodes of the cluster causing serious issues in the cluster.

Expected results:
The installer should embed the search domain in /etc/resolv.conf file on all nodes of the cluster.

Additional info:

• Cu was trying to deploy secure Kerberos on the CoreOS nodes and it failed when the IPA-client install command failed. This is when the customer noticed this unusual behavior. They did not manually update the resolv.conf file to include the $search domain. They instead added the script below to /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ and restarted NetworkManager on the node to fix this issue and installation was successful.
  ~~~
  #!/bin/bash

set -eo pipefail

DISPATCHER_FILE="/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/30-resolv-prepender"
DOMAINS="$(grep -E '\s*DOMAINS=.*iad2.dc.paas.redhat.com' $DISPATCHER_FILE \

>&2 echo "IT-PaaS: overwriting search domains in /etc/resolv.conf with: $DOMAINS"

sed -e "/^search/d" \
-e "/Generated by/c# Generated by KNI resolv prepender NM dispatcher script \nsearch $DOMAINS" \
/etc/resolv.conf > /etc/resolv.tmp

mv /etc/resolv.tmp /etc/resolv.conf
~~~

• Cu confirms that the $search domain was missing since the cluster was freshly installed/ They even confirmed this with a fresh new cluster as well that it was missing.

• The fresh cluster was initially installed at v4.9.31 but was updated afterward to v4.9.43 (the latest z-stream) to see if the updates fixed anything but it didn't make any difference. The cluster is currently running v4.9.43 and shows the $search domain missing in the /etc/resolv.conf file on all nodes.

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3330

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1325

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3117. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3084. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Upstream Issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/77603

Long log lines get corrupted when using '--timestamps' by the Kubelet.

The root cause is that the buffer reads up to a new line. If the line is greater than 4096 bytes and '--timestamps' is turrned on the kubelet will write the timestamp and the partial log line. We will need to refactor the ReadLogs function to allow for a partial line read.

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/f892ab1bd7fd97f1fcc2e296e85fdb8e3e8fb82d/pkg/kubelet/kuberuntime/logs/logs.go#L325

apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: logs
spec:
  restartPolicy: Never
  containers:
  - name: logs
    image: fedora
    args:
    - bash
    - -c
    - 'for i in `seq 1 10000000`; do echo -n $i; done'

kubectl logs logs --timestamps

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1408

libovsdb builds transaction log messages for every transaction and then throws them away if the log level is not 4 or above. This wastes a bunch of CPU at scale and increases pod ready latency.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1374

• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/506

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1765. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

If a customer creates a machine with a networks section like this

networks:
- filter: {}
  noAllowedAddressPairs: false
  subnets:
  - filter: {}
    uuid: primary-subnet-uuid
- filter: {}
  noAllowedAddressPairs: true
  subnets:
  - filter: {}
    uuid: other-subnet-uuid
primarySubnet: primary-subnet-uuid

Then all the ports are created without the allowed address pairs.

Doing some research in the source code, I have found that:
- For each entry on the networks: section, networks are filtered as per its filter: section[1]
- Then, if the subnets: section of the network entry is not empty, for each of the network IDs found above[2], 2 things are done that are relevant for this situatoin:
  - The net ID is saved on a netsWithoutAllowedAddressPairs[3]. That map is later checked while creating any port[4].
  - For each subnet entry that matches the network ID, a port is created[5].

So, the problematic behavior happens due to the following:

- Both entries in the networks array have empty filters. This means that both entries selected all the neutron networks.
- This configuration results in one port per subnet as expected because, in the later traversal of the subnets array of each entry[5], it is filtering by subnet and creating a single port as expected.
- However, the entry with "noAllowedAddressPairs: true" is selecting all the neutron networks, so it adds all of them to the netsWithoutAllowedAddressPairs map[3], regardless of the subnets filtering.
- As all the networks are in noAllowedAddressPairs: true array, all the ports created for the VM have their allowed address pairs removed[4].

Why do we consider this behavior undesired?

I understand that, if we create a port for a network that has no allowed pairs, we create all the other ports in the same networks without the pairs. However, it is surprising that a port in a network is removed the allowed address pairs due to a setting in an entry that yielded no port on that network. In other words, one would expect that the same subnet filtering that happens on each network entry in what regards yielding ports for the VM would also work for the noAllowedPairs parameter.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.30

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a machineset like in the description
2.
3.

Actual results:

All ports have no address pairs

Expected results:

Only the port on the secondary subnet has no address pairs.

Additional info:

A simple workaround would be to just fill the filter so that a single network is selected for each network entry.

References:
[1] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L576
[2] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L580
[3] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L581-L583
[4] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L658-L660
[5] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L610-L625

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/pull/243

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-provider-openstack/pull/57

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10603. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10558. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

When running a cluster on application credentials, this event appears repeatedly:

ns/openshift-machine-api machineset/nhydri0d-f8dcc-kzcwf-worker-0 hmsg/173228e527 - pathological/true reason/ReconcileError could not find information for "ci.m1.xlarge"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Happens in the CI (https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_release/33330/rehearse-33330-periodic-ci-shiftstack-shiftstack-ci-main-periodic-4.13-e2e-openstack-ovn-serial/1633149670878351360).

Steps to Reproduce:

1. On a living cluster, rotate the OpenStack cloud credentials
2. Invalidate the previous credentials
3. Watch the machine-api events (`oc -n openshift-machine-api get event`). A `Warning` type of issue could not find information for "name-of-the-flavour" will appear.

If the cluster was installed using a password that you can't invalidate:
1. Rotate the cloud credentials to application credentials
2. Restart MAPO (`oc -n openshift-machine-api get pods -o NAME | xargs -r oc -n openshift-machine-api delete`)
3. Rotate cloud credentials again
4. Revoke the first application credentials you set
5. Finally watch the events (`oc -n openshift-machine-api get event`)

The event signals that MAPO wasn't able to update flavour information on the MachineSet status.

Actual results:

Expected results:

No issue detecting the flavour details

Additional info:

Offending code likely around this line: https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-provider-openstack/blob/bcb08a7835c08d20606d75757228fd03fbb20dab/pkg/machineset/controller.go#L116

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-provider-openstack/pull/67

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4486. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-95. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
In an OpenShift cluster with OpenShiftSDN network plugin with egressIP and NMstate operator configured, there are some conditions when the egressIP is deconfigured from the network interface.

The bug is 100% reproducible.

Steps for reproducing the issue are:

1. Install a cluster with OpenShiftSDN network plugin.

2. Configure egressip for a project.

3. Install NMstate operator.

4. Create a NodeNetworkConfigurationPolicy.

5. Identify on which node the egressIP is present.

6. Restart the nmstate-handler pod running on the identified node.

7. Verify that the egressIP is no more present.

Restarting the sdn pod related to the identified node will reconfigure the egressIP in the node.

This issue has a high impact since any changes triggered for the NMstate operator will prevent application traffic. For example, in the customer environment, the issue is triggered any time a new node is added to the cluster.

The expectation is that NMstate operator should not interfere with SDN configuration.

• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/492

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10314. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8741. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5889. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Customer running a cluster with following config:
4.10.23
AWS/IPI
OVNKubernetes

Observed that in namespace with networkpolicy rules enabled, and a policy for allow-from-same namespace, pods will have different behaviors when calling service IP's hosted in that same namespace.

Example:
Deployment1 with two pods (A/B) exists in namespace <EXAMPLE>
Deployment2 with 1 pod hosting a service and route exists in same namespace
Pod A will unexpectedly stop being able to call service IP of deployment2; Pod B will never lose access to calling service IP of deployment2.

Pod A remains able to call out through br-ex interface, tag the ROUTE address, and reach deployment2 pod via haproxy (this never breaks)

Pod A remains able to reach the local gateway on the node

Host node for Pod A is able to reach the service IP of deployment2 and remains able to do so, even while pod A is impacted.

Issue can be mitigated by applying a label or annotation to pod A, which immediately allows it to reach internal service IPs again within the namespace.

I suspect that the issue is to do with the networkpolicy rules failing to stay updated on the pod object, and the pod needs to be 'refreshed' --> label appendation/other update, to force the pod to 'remember' that it is allowed to call peers within the namespace.

Additional relevant data:
- pods affects throughout cluster; no specific project/service/deployment/application
- pods ride on different nodes all the time (no one node affected)
- pods with fail condition are on same node with other pods without issue
- multiple namespaces see this problem
- all namespaces are using similar networkpolicy isolation and allow-from-same-namespace ruleset (which matches our documentation on syntax).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.23

How reproducible:

every time --> unclear what the trigger is that causes this; pods will be functional and several hours/days later, will stop being able to talk to peer services.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. deploy pod with at least two replicas in a namespace with allow-from same network policy
2. deploy a different service and route example httpd instance in same namespace
3. observe that one of the two pods may fail to reach service IP after some time
4. apply annotation to pod and it is immediately able to reach services again.

Actual results:

pods intermittently fail to reach internal service addresses, but are able to be interacted with otherwise, and can reach upstream/external addresses including routes on cluster. 

Expected results:

pods should not lose access to service network peers. 

Additional info:

see next comments for relevant uploads/sosreports and inspects.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1616

Description of problem:

When a pod runs to a completed state, we typically rely on the update event that will indicate to us that this pod is completed. At that point the pod IP is released and the port configuration is removed in OVN. The subsequent delete event for this pod will be ignored because it should have been cleaned up in the previous update.

However, there can be cases where the update event is missed with pod completed. In this case we will only receive a delete with pod completed event, and ignore tearing down the pod. The end result is the pod is not cleaned up in OVN and the IP address remains allocated, reducing the amount of address range available to launch another pod. This can lead to exhausting all IP addresses available for pod allocation on a node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.24

How reproducible:

Not sure how to reproduce this. I'm guessing some lag in kapi updates can cause the completed update event and the final delete event to be combined into a single event.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Port still exists in OVN, IP remains allocated for a deleted pod.

Expected results:

IP should be freed, port should be removed from OVN.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1455

Description of problem:
Users on a fully-disconnected cluster could not see Devfiles in the developer catalog or import a Devfiles. That's fine.

But the API calls /api/devfile/samples/ and /api/devfile/ takes 30 seconds until they fail with a 504 Gateway timeout error.

If possible they should fail immediately.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
This might happen since 4.8

Tested this yet only on 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-07-112008

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Start a disconnected cluster with a proxy
2. Open the browser network inspector and filter for /api/devfile
3. Switch to Developer perspective
   1. Navigate to Add > Developer Catalog (All Services) > Devfiles
   2. Or Add > Import from Git > and enter https://github.com/devfile-samples/devfile-sample-go-basic.git

Actual results:

• Network call fails after 30 seconds
• Import doesn't work

Expected results:

• Network calls should fail immediately
• We doesn't expect that the import will work

Additional info:
The console Pod log contains this error:

E0909 10:28:18.448680 1 devfile-handler.go:74] Failed to parse devfile: failed to populateAndParseDevfile: Get "https://registry.devfile.io/devfiles/go": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12186

Description of problem:

To address: 'Static Pod is managed but errored" err="managed container xxx does not have Resource.Requests'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Already merged in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/660

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/667

Description of problem:

Looks like a regression was introduced and the Windows networking tests started to fail accross all 4.11 CI jobs for both Linux-to-Windows and Windows-to-Windows pods communication. 

https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1415 merged without passing Windows networking tests.

https://github.com/openshift/windows-machine-config-operator/pull/1359  shows networking tests failing accross all CI jobs.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Always 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Trigger a job retest in any of the above mentioned PRs
 

Actual results:

Windows networking test fail

Expected results:

Windows networking test pass

Additional info:

Direct link to a release-4.11 aws-e2e-operator CI job showing the failed networking test. 

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1459

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10372. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10220. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7559. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

When attempting to add nodes to a long-lived 4.12.3 cluster, net new nodes are not able to join the cluster. They are provisioned in the cloud provider (AWS), but never actually join as a node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.3

How reproducible:

Consistent

Steps to Reproduce:

1. On a long lived cluster, add a new machineset

Actual results:

Machines reach "Provisioned" but don't join the cluster

Expected results:

Machines join cluster as nodes

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3615

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2495. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Failures like:

$ oc login --token=...

Logged into "https://api..." as "..." using the token provided.

Error from server (Timeout): the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get projects.project.openshift.io)

break login, which tries to gather information before saving the configuration, including a giant project list.

Ideally login would be able to save the successful login credentials, even when the informative gathering had difficulties. And possibly the informative gathering could be made conditional (--quiet or similar?) so expensive gathering could be skipped in use-cases where the context was not needed.

• https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1274

• https://github.com/openshift/coredns/pull/79

This is a clone of OCPBUGSM-47085
Version:

$ openshift-install version
4.11.0-rc2

Platform:

Nutanix

On `openshift-installer create manifests` stage a connection to Prism is made (see https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/asset/installconfig/nutanix/validation.go#L15-L36=)

This make generating manifests separately impossible, which breaks Assisted Installer flow. Instead of storing sensitive user information, Assisted Installer sets fake details in install-config.yaml and asks user to update these after installation has completed.

With validation happening on `openshift-install create manifests` phase installation process can't start with invalid credentials.

Please move this validation to ValidateForProvisioning, similar to vSphere

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6251

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3307

Description of problem:

NodePort port not accessible

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.8.20

How reproducible:

$oc -n ui-nprd get services -o wide
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE SELECTOR
docker-registry ClusterIP 10.201.219.240 <none> 5000/TCP 24d app=registry
docker-registry-lb LoadBalancer 10.201.252.253 internal-xxxxxx.xx-xxxx-1.elb.amazonaws.com 5000:30779/TCP 3d22h app=registry
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.216.26 <none> 5000:32428/TCP 3d16h app=registry

$oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxx.ca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.96
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -vz 10.81.23.96 32428
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connection timed out.

In a new-created namespaces the same deployment works:

[RHEL7:> oc project
Using project "test-c1" on server "https://api.xx.xx.xxxx.xx.xx:6443".
[RHEL7:- ~/tmp]> oc port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
Forwarding from 127.0.0.1:5000 -> 5000

[1]+ Stopped oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> bg %1
[1]+ oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000 &
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> nc -v localhost 5000
Ncat: Version 7.50 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 127.0.0.1:5000.
Handling connection for 5000

[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> kill %1
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]>
[1]+ Terminated oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get services
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.224.174 <none> 5000:31793/TCP 68s

[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get pods -o wide
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES
registry-75b7c7fd94-rx29j 1/1 Running 0 7m5s 10.201.1.29 ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal <none> <none>
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxxca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.87
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -v 10.81.23.87 31793
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 10.81.23.87:31793.

Actual results:

• Working on new created namespace
• Not working on already created namespace

Expected results:

• Suppose to work on all namespaces.

Additional info:

• This cluster get upgrade from 4.7.x to 4.8 and then they manually enable OVN.
• The issue was happening on all namespaces but after restarting the ovnkube-master-xxxx pods only the newly created namespaces work.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1478

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1498

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/pull/1123

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1329. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted due to failed liveness probes while deleting/re-creating pods on SNO

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.32

How reproducible:

Not always, after ~10 attempts

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with Telco DU profile applied
2. Create multiple pods with local storage volumes attached(attaching yaml manifest)
3. Force delete and re-create pods 10 times

Actual results:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted, making to cluster unavailable for a period of time

Expected results:

etcd and kube-apiserver do not get restarted

Additional info: