Problem:

Certain Insights Advisor features differentiate between RHEL and OCP advisor

Goal:

Address top priority UI misalignments between RHEL and OCP advisor. Address UI features dropped from Insights ADvisor for OCP GA.

Scope:

Specific tasks and priority of them tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-7432

Managing PVs at scale for a fleet creates difficulties where "one size does not fit all". The ability for SRE to deploy prometheus with PVs and have retention based an on a desired size would enable easier management of these volumes across the fleet. 

The prometheus-operator exposes retentionSize.

This is a feature request to enable this configuration option via CMO cluster-monitoring-config ConfigMap.

cc Simon Pasquier  

Problem Alignment

The Problem

Today, all configuration for setting individual, for example, routing configuration is done via a single configuration file that only admins have access to. If an environment uses multiple tenants and each tenant, for example, has different systems that they are using to notify teams in case of an issue, then someone needs to file a request w/ an admin to add the required settings.

That can be bothersome for individual teams, since requests like that usually disappear in the backlog of an administrator. At the same time, administrators might get tons of requests that they have to look at and prioritize, which takes them away from more crucial work.

We would like to introduce a more self service approach whereas individual teams can create their own configuration for their needs w/o the administrators involvement.

Last but not least, since Monitoring is deployed as a Core service of OpenShift there are multiple restrictions that the SRE team has to apply to all OSD and ROSA clusters. One restriction is the ability for customers to use the central Alertmanager that is owned and managed by the SRE team. They can't give access to the central managed secret due to security concerns so that users can add their own routing information.

High-Level Approach

Provide a new API (based on the Operator CRD approach) as part of the Prometheus Operator that allows creating a subset of the Alertmanager configuration without touching the central Alertmanager configuration file.

Please note that we do not plan to support additional individual webhooks with this work. Customers will need to deploy their own version of the third party webhooks.

Goal & Success

• Allow users to deploy individual configurations that allow setting up Alertmanager for their needs without an administrator.

Solution Alignment

Key Capabilities

• As an OpenShift administrator, I want to control who can CRUD individual configuration so that I can make sure that any unknown third person can touch the central Alertmanager instance shipped within OpenShift Monitoring.
• As a team owner, I want to deploy a routing configuration to push notifications for alerts to my system of choice.

Key Flows

Team A wants to send all their important notifications to a specific Slack channel.

• Administrator gives permission to Team A to allow creating a new configuration CR in their individual namespace.
• Team A creates a new configuration CR.
• Team A configures what alerts should go into their Slack channel.
• Open Questions & Key Decisions (optional)
• Do we want to improve anything inside the developer console to allow configuration?

Copy/paste from [_https://github.com/openshift-cs/managed-openshift/issues/60_]

Which service is this feature request for?
OpenShift Dedicated and Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS

What are you trying to do?
Allow ROSA/OSD to integrate with AWS Managed Prometheus.

Describe the solution you'd like
Remote-write of metrics is supported in OpenShift but it does not work with AWS Managed Prometheus since AWS Managed Prometheus requires AWS SigV4 auth.

• Note that Prometheus supports AWS SigV4 since v2.26 and OpenShift 4.9 uses v2.29.

Describe alternatives you've considered
There is the workaround to use the "AWS SigV4 Proxy" but I'd think this is not properly supported by RH.
https://mobb.ninja/docs/rosa/cluster-metrics-to-aws-prometheus/

Additional context
The customer wants to use an open and portable solution to centralize metrics storage and analysis. If they also deploy to other clouds, they don't want to have to re-configure. Since most clouds offer a Prometheus service (or it's easy to self-manage Prometheus), app migration should be simplified.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.

Feature Overview.

Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.

While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.

 For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.

Goals

• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane topology to host more workloads capacity - add worker
• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane to be a highly available control plane
• To satisfy MMIMO Telecommunications providers will want the ability to scale a SNO to a multi-node cluster that can support HPA.
• Telecommunications providers do not want workload (DU specifically) downtime when migrating from SNO to a multi-node cluster.
• Telecommunications providers wish to be able to scale from one to two or more nodes to support a variety of radio hardware.
• Support CP scaling (CP HA) for 2 node cluster, 3 node cluster and n node cluster. As the number of nodes in the cluster increases so does the failure domain of the cluster. The cluster is now supporting more cell sectors and therefore has more of a need for HA and resiliency including the cluster CP.

Requirements

• TBD

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

• As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.

• As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

• Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

• Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
• Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
• Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
• Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
• In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
• For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
• Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
• The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
• The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

• As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
• As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
• As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
• As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
• As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

• As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
• As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

• This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• Bootable Ephemeral Installer Image for Disconnected Cluster 0 Deployments

Feature Overview

The AWS-specific code added in OCPPLAN-6006 needs to become GA and with this we want to introduce a couple of Day2 improvements.
Currently the AWS tags are defined and applied at installation time only and saved in the infrastructure CRD's status field for further operator use, which in turn just add the tags during creation.

Saving in the status field means it's not included in Velero backups, which is a crucial feature for customers and Day2.
Thus the status.resourceTags field should be deprecated in favour of a newly created spec.resourceTags with the same content. The installer should only populate the spec, consumers of the infrastructure CRD must favour the spec over the status definition if both are supplied, otherwise the status should be honored and a warning shall be issued.

Being part of the spec, the behaviour should also tag existing resources that do not have the tags yet and once the tags in the infrastructure CRD are changed all the AWS resources should be updated accordingly.

On AWS this can be done without re-creating any resources (the behaviour is basically an upsert by tag key) and is possible without service interruption as it is a metadata operation.

Tag deletes continue to be out of scope, as the customer can still have custom tags applied to the resources that we do not want to delete.

Due to the ongoing intree/out of tree split on the cloud and CSI providers, this should not apply to clusters with intree providers (!= "external").

Once confident we have all components updated, we should introduce an end2end test that makes sure we never create resources that are untagged.

After that, we can remove the experimental flag and make this a GA feature.

Goals

• Inclusion in the cluster backups
• Flexibility of changing tags during cluster lifetime, without recreating the whole cluster

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

List any affected packages or components.

• Installer
• Cluster Infrastructure
• Storage
• Node
• NetworkEdge
• Internal Registry
• CCO

Feature Overview  

Much like core OpenShift operators, a standardized flow exists for OLM-managed operators to interact with the cluster in a specific way to leverage AWS STS authorization when using AWS APIs as opposed to insecure static, long-lived credentials. OLM-managed operators can implement integration with the CloudCredentialOperator in well-defined way to support this flow.

Goals:

Enable customers to easily leverage OpenShift's capabilities around AWS STS with layered products, for increased security posture. Enable OLM-managed operators to implement support for this in well-defined pattern.

Requirements:

• CCO gets a new mode in which it can reconcile STS credential request for OLM-managed operators
• A standardized flow is leveraged to guide users in discovering and preparing their AWS IAM policies and roles with permissions that are required for OLM-managed operators 
• A standardized flow is defined in which users can configure OLM-managed operators to leverage AWS STS
• An example operator is used to demonstrate the end2end functionality
• Clear instructions and documentation for operator development teams to implement the required interaction with the CloudCredentialOperator to support this flow

Use Cases:

See Operators & STS slide deck.

Out of Scope:

• handling OLM-managed operator updates in which AWS IAM permission requirements might change from one version to another (which requires user awareness and intervention)

Background:

The CloudCredentialsOperator already provides a powerful API for OpenShift's cluster core operator to request credentials and acquire them via short-lived tokens. This capability should be expanded to OLM-managed operators, specifically to Red Hat layered products that interact with AWS APIs. The process today is cumbersome to none-existent based on the operator in question and seen as an adoption blocker of OpenShift on AWS.

Customer Considerations

This is particularly important for ROSA customers. Customers are expected to be asked to pre-create the required IAM roles outside of OpenShift, which is deemed acceptable.

Documentation Considerations

• Internal documentation needs to exists to guide Red Hat operator developer teams on the requirements and proposed implementation of integration with CCO and the proposed flow
• External documentation needs to exist to guide users on:
  • how to become aware that the cluster is in STS mode
  • how to become aware of operators that support STS and the proposed CCO flow
  • how to become aware of the IAM permissions requirements of these operators
  • how to configure an operator in the proposed flow to interact with CCO

Interoperability Considerations

• this needs to work with ROSA
• this needs to work with self-managed OCP on AWS

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Feature --->
<--- Remove the descriptive text as appropriate --->

Feature Overview

• As RH OpenShift Product Owners, we want to enable new providers/platforms/service with varying levels of capabilities and integration with minimal reliance on OpenShift Engineering.
• As a new provider/platform partner, I want to enable my solution (hardware and/or software) with OpenShift with minimal effort.

Problem

• It is currently challenging for us to enable new platforms / providers without taking the heavy burden on doing the platform specific development ourselves.

Goals

• We want to enable the long-tail new platforms/providers to expand our reach into new markets and/or support new use cases.
• We want to remove strict dependencies we have on Engineering teams to review, support and test new providers.
• We want to lower the effort required for onboarding new platforms/providers.
• We want to enable new platform/providers to self-certify.
• We want to define tiered model for provider/platform integration that delineates ownership and responsibilities throughout new provider/platform development lifecycle and support model.
• We want to reduce time to onboard new provider/platform – ideally to a single release.
• We want to maintain consistent customer experience across all providers/platforms.

Requirements

• Step-by-step guide on how to add a new platform/provider for each tier
• Certification tool for partner to self-certify
• Certification tool results for (at least) each Y/minor release submitted by partner to Red Hat for acknowledgement
• DCI program to enable partners to run CI with OpenShift on their platform
• Well documented, accessible, and up-to-date test suites for providing the test coverage of the partner
• CI includes upgrade testing of OpenShift with partner's components
• Partner component upgrade failure should not block OpenShift upgrade
• Partner code is available in repositories in the openshift org on github with an open source license compatible with OpenShift

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• [ Notes - OpenShift Everywhere - Onboarding new providers/platforms|https://www.google.com/url?q=[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M1zLG2-wmkeCWTS8omN5G8vsDKvDeZfmegsi7cCVh-U/edit?usp%3Dsharing&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1641920246517943&usg=AOvVaw2ZIl_XuE7OsSr4wCmRjOp3]] 
• OKD Installer Architecture Brainstorming Working Group Meeting Minutes
• New-Platform Documentation Working Group Meeting Minutes

Goal

Increase integration of Shipwright, Tekton, Argo CD in OpenShift GitOps with OpenShift platform and related products such as ACM.

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

• Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
• Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

• Core Networking Stability
• Core Networking Performance and Scale
• Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
• Core Networking UX (Observability)
• Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

• Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
• SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
• Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

• CNV
• Service Mesh
• CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.

Relevant links:

• Documentation:
  • Edge Diagnostics Scratchpad, our team's internal diagnostic guide.
  • Troubleshooting OCP networking issues - The complete guide, the SDN team's diagnostic guide.
  • Linux Performance, Brendan Gregg's guide to analyzing Linux performance issues.
  • RFC: A proper feedback loop on Alerts.
  • OpenShift Router Reload Technical Overview on Access.
  • Performance Scaling HAProxy with OpenShift on Access.
  • How to collect worker metrics to troubleshoot CPU load, memory pressure and interrupt issues and networking on worker nodes in OCP 4 on Access.
  • OpenShift Performance and Scale Knowledge Base on Mojo, results from OpenShift scalability testing.
  • Scalability and performance, OCP 4.5 documentation about the router's currently known scalability limits.
  • Scaling OpenShift Container Platform HAProxy Router, OCP 3.11 documentation about the manual performance configuration that was possible in OCP 3.
  • Timing web requests with cURL and Chrome from the Cloudflare blog.
  • tcpdump advanced filters, some useful tcpdump commands.
  • OpenShift SDN - Networking, OCP 3.11 documentation on the SDN (useful background reading).
  • Ingress Operator and Controller Status Conditions, design document for improved status condition reporting.
  • Observability tips for HAProxy, a slide deck by Willy Tarreau.
  • Interesting Traces - Out of Order versus Retransmissions, analysis using tshark.
  • The PCP Book: A Complete Documentation of Performance Co-Pilot, by Yogesh Babar.
  • Debugging kernel networking bug, brief guide to using SystemTap on RHCOS.
  • Troubleshooting throughput issues from the OCP 4.5 documentation.
  • Troubleshooting OpenShift Clusters and Workloads.
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Network Performance Tuning Guide (PDF).
  • openshift/enhancements#289 stability: point to point network check, a diagnostic built into the kube-apiserver operator.
• Diagnostic tools:
  • dropwatch to watch for packet drops.
  • ethtool to check NIC configuration.
  • iovisor/bcc: BCC - Tools for BPF-based Linux IO analysis, networking, monitoring, and more to trace and diagnose various issues in the networking stack.
  • r-curler to gather timing information about HTTP/HTTPS connections.
  • route-monitor, to monitor routes for reachability.
  • hping(3), a programmable packet generator.
  • OpenTracing / Jaeger in OpenShift.
  • node-problem-detector, a possible integration point for new diagnostics.
  • Using SystemTap by Brendan Gregg.
  • DTrace SystemTap cheatsheet (PDF).
• Visualization and more sophisticated diagnostic tools:
  • eldadru/ksniff, kubectl plugin for tcpdump & Wireshark.
  • ironcladlou/ditm, Dan's "Dan in the Middle" tool.
  • Skydive, network diagnostic and visualization tool.
  • ali, a "load testing tool capable of performing real-time analysis" with visualization.
• Testing tools:
  • stress-ng, a general stress-loading tool (CPU, filesystem, network, ...).
  • mb, the networking benchmarking tool written and used by Jiri Mencak from our Perf+Scale team.
• Case studies:
  • BZ1763206 is an example of diagnosing DNS latency/timeouts.
  • BZ1829779 Investigation details the diagnosis of route latency.
  • BZ1845545 is an example of diagnosing misconfigured DNS for an external LB.
  • Debugging network stalls on Kubernetes, from the GitHub Blog, about diagnosing Kubernetes performance issues related to ksoftirqd.

Feature Overview

• This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary

• Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

Goals

• This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

• …

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories

• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories

• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?

• Does this feature have doc impact?  

• New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact

• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.

• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?

• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?

• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?

• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.

• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

Customers are asking for improvements to the upgrade experience (both over-the-air and disconnected). This is a feature tracking epics required to get that work done.  

Goals

1. Have an option to do upgrades in more discrete steps under admin control. Specifically, these steps are: 
   • Control plane upgrade
   • Worker nodes upgrade
   • Workload enabling upgrade (i..e. Router, other components) or infra nodes
2. Better visibility into any errors during the upgrades and documentation of what they error means and how to recover. 
3. An user experience around an end-2-end back-up and restore after a failed upgrade 
4. OTA-810  - Better Documentation: 
   • Backup procedures before upgrades. 
   • More control over worker upgrades (with tagged pools between user Vs admin)
   • The kinds of pre-upgrade tests that are run, the errors that are flagged and what they mean and how to address them. 
   • Better explanation of each discrete step in upgrades, and what each CVO Operator is doing and potential errors, troubleshooting and mitigating actions.

References

• OpenShift Upgrades Customer Issues Discussion -6/22/2023
• Select Customer Experiences and Feedback on Upgrades

Feature Overview

Enable sharing ConfigMap and Secret across namespaces

Requirements

Questions to answer…

NA

Out of Scope

NA

Background, and strategic fit

Consumption of RHEL entitlements has been a challenge on OCP 4 since it moved to a cluster-based entitlement model compared to the node-based (RHEL subscription manager) entitlement mode. In order to provide a sufficiently similar experience to OCP 3, the entitlement certificates that are made available on the cluster (OCPBU-93) should be shared across namespaces in order to prevent the need for cluster admin to copy these entitlements in each namespace which leads to additional operational challenges for updating and refreshing them. 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:
 * What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
 * Does this feature have doc impact?
 * New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
 * If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
 * What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
 * How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
 * What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
 * Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
 * What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Summary (PM+lead)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-2 revealed that, in prinicipal, Pod Security Admission is possible to integrate into OpenShift while retaining SCC functionality.

This epic is about the concrete steps to enable Pod Security Admission by default in OpenShift

Motivation (PM+lead)

Goals (lead)

• Enable Pod Security Admission in "restricted" policy level by default
• Migrate existing core workloads to comply to the "restricted" pod security policy level

Non-Goals (lead)

• Other OpenShift workloads must be migrated by the individual responsible teams.

Deliverables

Proposal (lead)

Enhancement - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1010

User Stories (PM)

Dependencies (internal and external, lead)

Previous Work (lead)

Open questions (lead)

1. ...

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-authentication-operator/pull/570
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator/pull/120
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/425

Epic Goal

HyperShift provisions OpenShift clusters with externally managed control-planes. It follows a slightly different process for provisioning clusters. For example, HyperShift uses cluster API as a backend and moves all the machine management bits to the management cluster.  

Why is this important?

showing machine management/cluster auto-scaling tabs in the console is likely to confuse users and cause unnecessary side effects. 

Definition of Done

• MachineConfig and MachineConfigPool should not be present, they should be either removed or hidden when the cluster is spawned using HyperShift. 
• Cluster Settings show say the control plane is externally managed and be read-only.
• Cluster Settings -> Configuration resources should be read-only, maybe hide the tab
• Some resources should go in an allowlist. Most will be hidden
• Review getting started steps

See Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

Setup / Testing

It's based on the SERVER_FLAG controlPlaneTopology being set to External is really the driving factor here; this can be done in one of two ways:

• Locally via a Bridge Variable, export BRIDGE_CONTROL_PLANE_TOPOLOGY_MODE="External"
• Locally / OnCluster via modifying the window.SERVER_FLAGS.controlPlaneTopology to External in the dev tools

To test work related to cluster upgrade process, use a 4.10.3 cluster set on the candidate-4.10 upgrade channel using 4.11 frontend code.

Epic Goal

• Ensure that OCP Admin console can enable dark mode
• Mechanism for switching between light/dark mode, based on user preferences or User Settings in OCP
• Identify changes needed for OCP console's dynamic plugins
• Status as we work through the stories: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18ib0A9ZtSYo1e2aOtM2LtZcsNFs1aRCHXx6NAPsIAso/edit#

Why is this important?

• So the UX satisfies the current trands, where dark mode is becoming a standard for modern services.  

Acceptance Criteria

• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode based on `prefers-color-scheme` media query
• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode selected in the User Setting page
• Create an followup epic/story for and listing and tracking changes needed in OCP console's dynamic plugins

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. PatternFly - Dark mode PF variables

Previous Work (Optional):

1. Mike Coker has worked on a POC from the PF point of view on both the admin and dev console, and the screenshot results are listed below along with the repo branch. Also listed is a document covering some of the common issues found when putting together the admin console POC. https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
   Background POC work completed for reference:

PatternFly Dark Theme Handbook: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mRYEfUoOjTsSt7hiqjbeplqhfo3_rVDO0QqMj2p67pw/edit

Admin Console -> Workloads & Pods

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BoOpXpX96_uNUhVJiEqGUCZ-JMYh1A78fXJhk3H86K8/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
• Github PR for Dark Theme WIP by Vikram: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10947{}

Dev Console -> Gotcha pages: Observe Dashboard and Metrics, Add, Pipelines: builder, list, log, and run

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13jagAf_JEu82hd_KpEHRmj25xCEqwImWpNufzVopuUs/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10815
• Evaluation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fBCPPb4Z1sqUDKgQkpueGe8VQZo4pBUA9PV4vnFCnDw/edit#gid=0

Open questions::

1. Who should be responsible for updating DynamicPlugins to be able to render in dark mode?

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

• Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Goal

• Add the ability for users to select supported but not recommended updates.
• Refine workflow when both "upgradeable=false" and "supported-but-not-recommended" updates occur

Background
RFE: for 4.10, Cincinnati and the cluster-version operator are adding conditional updates (a.k.a. targeted edge blocking): https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-267

High-level plans in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#update-client-support-for-the-enhanced-schema

Example of what the oc adm upgrade UX will be in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#cluster-administrator.

The oc implementation landed via https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/961.

Design

• Use case 01: "supported but not recommended" occurs to the latest version:
  • Add an info icon next to the version on update path with a pop-over to explain about why updating to this version is supported, but not recommended and a link to known risks
  • Identify the difference in "recommended" versions, "supported but not recommended" versions, and "blocked" versions (upgradeable=false) in the + more modal.
  • The latest version is pre-selected in the dropdown in the update modal with an inline alert to inform users about supported-but-not-recommended version with link to known risks. Users can choose to update to another recommended versions, update to a supported-but-not-recommended one, or wait.
  • The "recommended" and "supported but not recommended" updates are separated in the dropdown.
  • If a user selects a "recommended" update, the inline alert disappears.
• Use case 02: When both "upgradeable=false" and "supported but not recommended" occur:
  • Add an alert banner to explain why users shouldn’t update to the latest version and link to how to resolve on the cluster settings details page. Users have the options to resolve the issue, update to a patch version, or wait.
  • If users open the update modal without resolving the "upgradeable=false" issue, the next recommended version is pre-selected. An expandable link "View blocked versions (#)" is included under the dropdown to show "upgradeable=false" versions with resolve link.
  • If users resolve the "upgradeable=false" issue, the cluster settings page will change to use case 01

• • Question: Priority on changing the upgradeable=false alert banner in update modal and blocked versions in dropdown

See design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nja4whdsI5dKmQNS_rXyN8IGtRXDJ8gXuU_eSxBLMIY/edit#

See marvel: https://marvelapp.com/prototype/h3ehaa4/screen/86077932

Epic Goal

• Add telemetry so that we know how image stream features are used.

Why is this important?

• We have a long standing epic to create image streams v2. We need to better understand how image streams are used today.

Scenarios

1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

• Make the image registry distributed across availability zones.

Why is this important?

• The registry should be highly available and zone failsafe.

Scenarios

1. As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Pod's topologySpreadConstraints

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/730
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Goal

Remove Jenkins from the OCP Payload.

Problem

• Jenkins images are "non-trival in size, impact experience around OCP payloads
• Security advisories cannot be handled once, but against all actively supported OCP releases, adding to response time for handling said advisories
• Some customers may now want to upgrade Jenkins as OCP upgrades (making this configurable is more ideal)

Why is this important

• This is an engineering motivated item to reduce costs so we have more cycles for strategic work
• Aside from the team itself, top level OCP architects want this to reduce the image size, improve general OCP upgrade experience
• Sends a mix message with respect to what is startegic CI/CI when Jenkins is baked into OCP, but Tekton/Pipelines is an add-on, day 2 install sort of thing

Dependencies (internal and external)

See epic linking - need alternative non payload image available to provide relatively seamless migration

Also, the EP for this is approved and merged at https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/builds/remove-jenkins-payload.md

Estimate (xs, s, m, l, xl, xxl):

Questions:

• in addition to needing the CPaaS Image available first, have we confirmed the "deprecate first, then remove" requirements?  Per grooming we've assigned Rob Gormley the task https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JKNS-274 for tracking this down.  I will be reaching out to Ben Parees (he is currently on vacation) to confirm from an OCP staff engineer / architect perspective if his approval of https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/841 is sufficient signoff from that end.

       PARTIAL ANSWER ^^:  confirmed with Ben Parees in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C014MHHKUSF/p1646683621293839 that EP merging is currently sufficient OCP "technical leadership" approval.

Previous work

Customers

assuming none

Epic Goal

• Remove this UI from our stack that we cannot support.

Why is this important?

• Reduce support burden.
• Remove Bugzilla burden of addressing continuous CVEs found in this project.

Acceptance Criteria

• All Prometheus upstream UI links are removed
• Related documentation is updated
• Ports/routes etc configured to expose access to this UI are removed such that no configuration we provide enables access to this UI or its codepaths.
• There is no reason any CVEs found in this UI would ever require intervention by the Monitoring Team.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Make the Prometheus Targets information available in Console UI (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1079)

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

When users configure CMO to interact with systems outside of an OpenShift cluster, we want to provide an easy way to add the cluster ID to the data send.

Why is this important?

Technically this can be achieved today, by adding an identifying label to the remote_write configuration for a given cluster. The operator adding the remote_write integration needs to take care that the label is unique over the managed fleet of clusters. This however adds management complexity. Any given cluster already has a pseudo-unique datum, that can be used for this purpose.

• Starting in 4.9 we support the Prometheus remote_write feature to send metric data to a storage integration outside of the cluster similar to our own Telemetry service.
• In Telemetry we already use the cluster ID to distinguish the various clusters.
• For users of remote_write this could add an easy way to add such distinguishing information.

Scenarios

1. An organisation with multiple OpenShift clusters want to store their metric data centralized in a dedicated system and use remote_write in all their clusters to send this data. When querying their centralized storage, metadata (here a label) is needed to separate the data of the various clusters.
2. Service providers who manage multiple clusters for multiple customers via a centralized storage system need distinguishing metadata too. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSD-6573 for example

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• Document how to use this feature

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. none

Previous Work (Optional):

1. none

Open questions::

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Implementation proposal:

Expose a flag in the CMO configuration, that is false by default (keeps backward compatibility) and when set to true will add the _id label to a remote_write configuration. More specifically it will be added to the top of a remote_write relabel_config list via the replace action. This will add the label as expect, but additionally a user could alter this label in a later relabel config to suit any specific requirements (say rename the label or add additional information to the value).
The location of this flag is the remote_write Spec, so this can be set for individual remote_write configurations.

Epic Goal

• Offer the option to double the scrape intervals for CMO controlled ServiceMonitors in single node deployments
• Alternatively automatically double the same scrape intervals if CMO detects an SNO setup

The potential target ServiceMonitors are:

• kubelet
• kube-state-metrics
• node-exporter
• etcd
• openshift-state-metrics

Why is this important?

• Reduce CPU usage in SNO setups
• Specifically doubling the scrape interval is important because:

1. we are confident that this will have the least chance to interfere with existing rules. We typically have rate queries over the last 2 minutes (no shorter time window). With 30 second scrape intervals (the current default) this gives us 4 samples in any 2 minute window. rate needs at least 2 samples to work, we want another 2 for failure tolerance. Doubling the scrape interval will still give us 2 samples in most 2 minute windows. If a scrape fails, a few rule evaluations might fail intermittently.
2. We expect a measureable reduction of CPU resources (see previous work)

Scenarios

1. RAN deployments (Telco Edge) are SNO deployments. In these setups a full CMO deployment is often not needed and the default setup consumes too many resources. OpenShift as a whole has only very limited CPU cycles available and too many cycles are spend on Monitoring

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1569

Open questions:

1. Whether doubling some scrape intervals reduces CPU usage to fit into the assigned budget

Non goals

• Allow arbitrarily long scrape intervals. This will interfere with alert and recoring rules
• Implement a global override to scrape intervals.

Problem:

This epic is mainly focused on the 4.10 Release QE activities

Goal:

1. Identify the scenarios for automation
2. Segregate the test Scenarios into smoke, Regression and other user stories
a. Update the https://docs.jboss.org/display/ODC/Automation+Status+Report
3. Align with layered operator teams for updating scripts
3. Work closely with dev team for epic automation
4. Create the automation scripts using cypress
5. Implement CI for nightly builds
6. Execute scripts on sprint basis

Why is it important?

To the track the QE progress at one place in 4.10 Release Confluence page

Use cases:

1. <case>

Acceptance criteria:

1. <criteria>

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Goal:

This epic covers a number of customer requests(RFEs) as well as increases usability.

Why is it important?

Customer satisfaction as well as improved usability.

Acceptance Criteria

1. Allow user to re-arrange the resources which have ben added to nav by the user
2. Improved user experience (form based experience)
   1. Form based editing of Routes
   2. Form based creation and editing of Config Maps
   3. Form base creation of Deployments
3. Improved discovery
   1. Include Share my project on the Add page to increase discoverability
   2. NS Helm Chart Repo
      1. Add tile to Add page for discoverability
      2. Provide a form driven creation experience
      3. User should be able to switch back and forth from Form/YAML
      4. change the intro text to the below & have the link in the intro text bring up the full page form
         1. Browse for charts that help manage complex installations and upgrades. Cluster administrators can customize the content made available in the catalog. Alternatively, developers can try to configure their own custom Helm Chart repository.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

None

Exploration:

Miro board from Epic Exploration

Problem:

Currently we are only able to get limited telemetry from the Dev Sandbox, but not from any of our managed clusters or on prem clusters.

Goals:

1. Enable gathering segment telemetry whenever cluster telemetry is enabled on OSD clusters
2. Have our OSD clusters opt into telemetry by default
3. Work with PM & UX to identify additional metrics to capture in addition to what we have enabled currently on Sandbox.
4. Ability to get a single report from woopra across all of our Sandbox and OSD clusters.
5. Be able to generate a report including metrics of a single cluster or all clusters of a certain type ( sandbox, or OSD)

Why is it important?

In order to improve properly analyze usage and the user experience, we need to be able to gather as much data as possible.

Goal:
Enhance oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) with heterogeneous architecture support

Epic Goal

• Update image registry dependencies (Kubernetes and OpenShift) to the latest versions.

Why is this important?

• New versions usually bring improvements that are needed by the registry and help with getting updates for z-stream.

Scenarios

1. As an OpenShift engineer, I want my components to use the versions of dependencies, so that they get fixes for known issues and can be easily updated in z-stream.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Kubernetes 1.24

Previous Work (Optional):

1. IR-210

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>

Epic Goal

• Provide a dedicated dashboard for NVIDIA GPU usage visualization in the OpenShift Console.

Why is this important?

• Customers that use GPUs in their clusters usually have the GPU workloads as the main purpose of their cluster. As such, it makes much more sense to have the details about the usage they are doing of GPGPU resources AND CPU/RAM rather than just CPU/RAM

Scenarios

1. As an admin of a cluster dedicated to data science, I want to quickly find out how much of my very costly resources are currently in use and if things are getting queued due to lack of resources

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. The NVIDIA GPU Operator must export to prometheus the relevant data

Open questions::

1. Will NVIDIA agree to these extra data exports in their GPU Operator?

I asked Zvonko Kaiser and he seemed open to it. I need to confirm with Shiva Merla

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

• Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

• OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
• Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
• Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
• Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

• Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
• When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
• User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
• Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of problem:
Switching the spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.loadBalancer.scope of the default ingresscontroller results in a degraded ingress operator. The routes using that endpoint like the console URL become inaccessible.
Degraded operators after scope change:

$ oc get co | grep -v ' True        False         False'
NAME                                       VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.11.4    False       False         True       72m     OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org/healthz": EOF
console                                    4.11.4    False       False         False      72m     RouteHealthAvailable: failed to GET route (https://console-openshift-console.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org): Get "https://console-openshift-console.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org": EOF
ingress                                    4.11.4    True        False         True       65m     The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: CanaryChecksSucceeding=False (CanaryChecksRepetitiveFailures: Canary route checks for the default ingress controller are failing)

We have noticed that each time this happens the underlying AWS loadbalancer gets recreated which is as expected however the router pods probably do not get notified about the new loadbalancer. The instances in the new loadbalancer become 'outOfService'.

Restarting one of the router pods fixes the issue and brings back a couple of instances under the loadbalancer back to 'InService' which leads to the operators becoming happy again.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

ingress in 4.11.z however we suspect this issue to also apply to older versions

How reproducible:

Consistently reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a test OCP 4.11 cluster in AWS
2. Switch the spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.loadBalancer.scope of the default ingresscontroller in openshift-ingress-operator to Internal from External (or vice versa)
3. New Loadbalancer is created in AWS for the default router service, however the instances behind are not in service

Actual results:

ingress, authentication and console operators go into a degraded state. Console URL of the cluster is inaccessible

Expected results:

The ingresscontroller scope transition from internal->External (or vice versa) is smooth without any downtime or operators going into degraded state. The console is accessible.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1389

Description of problem:

When a pod runs to a completed state, we typically rely on the update event that will indicate to us that this pod is completed. At that point the pod IP is released and the port configuration is removed in OVN. The subsequent delete event for this pod will be ignored because it should have been cleaned up in the previous update.

However, there can be cases where the update event is missed with pod completed. In this case we will only receive a delete with pod completed event, and ignore tearing down the pod. The end result is the pod is not cleaned up in OVN and the IP address remains allocated, reducing the amount of address range available to launch another pod. This can lead to exhausting all IP addresses available for pod allocation on a node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.24

How reproducible:

Not sure how to reproduce this. I'm guessing some lag in kapi updates can cause the completed update event and the final delete event to be combined into a single event.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Port still exists in OVN, IP remains allocated for a deleted pod.

Expected results:

IP should be freed, port should be removed from OVN.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1455

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5100. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5068. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

virtual media provisioning fails when iLO Ironic driver is used

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. attempt virtual media provisioning on a node configured with ilo-virtualmedia:// drivers
2.
3.

Actual results:

Provisioning fails with "An auth plugin is required to determine endpoint URL" error

Expected results:

Provisioning succeeds

Additional info:

Relevant log snippet:

3742 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector [None req-e58ac1f2-fac6-4d28-be9e-983fa900a19b - - - - - -] Unable to start managed inspection for node e4445d43-3458-4cee-9cbe-6da1de75      78cd: An auth plugin is required to determine endpoint URL: keystoneauth1.exceptions.auth_plugins.MissingAuthPlugin: An auth plugin is required to determine endpoint URL
 3743 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector Traceback (most recent call last):
 3744 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/inspector.py", line 210, in _start_managed_inspection
 3745 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     task.driver.boot.prepare_ramdisk(task, ramdisk_params=params)
 3746 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic_lib/metrics.py", line 59, in wrapped
 3747 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 3748 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/ilo/boot.py", line 408, in prepare_ramdisk
 3749 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     iso = image_utils.prepare_deploy_iso(task, ramdisk_params,
 3750 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/image_utils.py", line 624, in prepare_deploy_iso
 3751 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     return prepare_iso_image(inject_files=inject_files)
 3752 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/image_utils.py", line 537, in _prepare_iso_image
 3753 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     image_url = img_handler.publish_image(
 3754 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/drivers/modules/image_utils.py", line 193, in publish_image
 3755 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     swift_api = swift.SwiftAPI()
 3756 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ironic/common/swift.py", line 66, in __init__
 3757 2022-12-19T19:02:05.997747170Z 2022-12-19 19:02:05.995 1 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.inspector     endpoint = keystone.get_endpoint('swift', session=session)

• https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/pull/342

Description of problem:

Each LB created for a Service type LoadBalancer results in 1 client rule and <# of public subnets> health rules being created.  The rules per SG quota in AWS is quite small; 60 by default, and 200 hard max.  OCP has about 40 rules OOTB. Assuming an HA cluster in 3 AZs, that is 4 rules per LB.  With default AWS quota, only ~5 LBs can be create and with the hard max of 200, only ~40 LBs can be created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.  Create Service type LoadBalancer and observe increase in master-sg and worker-sg rules sets
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 rules are created

Expected results:

1 rules is created when the client rule is a superset of the per-subnet health rules

Additional info:

This ~4x the number of Services of type LoadBalancer.  This is required for Hypershift.

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1375

• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/506

Description of problem:

When running node-density (245 pods/node) on a 120 node cluster, we see that there is a huge spike (~22s) in Avg pod-latency. When the spike occurs we see all the ovnkube-master pods go through a restart. 

The restart happens because of (ovnkube-master pods)

2022-08-10T04:04:44.494945179Z panic: reflect: call of reflect.Value.Len on ptr Value

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-09-114621

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run node-density on a 120 node cluster

Actual results:

Spike observed in pod-latency graph ~22s

Expected results:

Steady pod-latency graph ~4s

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1266

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1334

Description of problem:

Upgrade OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 fails with one 'NotReady,SchedulingDisabled' node and MachineConfigDaemonFailed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Upgrade from OCP 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 on top of OSP RHOS-16.2-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1 to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107.

Network Type: OVNKubernetes

How reproducible:

Twice out of two attempts.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 (IPI) on top of OSP RHOS-16.2-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1.
   The cluster is up and running with three workers:
   $ oc get clusterversion
   NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
   version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   True        False         51m     Cluster version is 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532

2. Run the OC command to upgrade to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107:
$ oc adm upgrade --to-image=registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 --allow-explicit-upgrade --force=true
warning: Using by-tag pull specs is dangerous, and while we still allow it in combination with --force for backward compatibility, it would be much safer to pass a by-digest pull spec instead
warning: The requested upgrade image is not one of the available updates.You have used --allow-explicit-upgrade for the update to proceed anyway
warning: --force overrides cluster verification of your supplied release image and waives any update precondition failures.
Requesting update to release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 

3. The upgrade is not succeeds: [0]
$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   True        True          17h     Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107: wait has exceeded 40 minutes for these operators: network

One node degrided to 'NotReady,SchedulingDisabled' status:
$ oc get nodes
NAME                          STATUS                        ROLES    AGE   VERSION
ostest-9vllk-master-0         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-master-1         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-master-2         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt   NotReady,SchedulingDisabled   worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-h6kcs   Ready                         worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-xhz9b   Ready                         worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f

$ oc get pods -A | grep -v -e Completed -e Running
NAMESPACE                                          NAME                                                         READY   STATUS      RESTARTS       AGE
openshift-openstack-infra                          coredns-ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt                          0/2     Init:0/1    0              18h
 
$ oc get events
LAST SEEN   TYPE      REASON                                        OBJECT            MESSAGE
7m15s       Warning   OperatorDegraded: MachineConfigDaemonFailed   /machine-config   Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]
7m15s       Warning   MachineConfigDaemonFailed                     /machine-config   Cluster not available for [{operator 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532}]: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]

$ oc get co
NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
baremetal                                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
console                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      19h     DNS "default" reports Progressing=True: "Have 5 available node-resolver pods, want 6."
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      18h     Progressing: The registry is ready...
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
insights                                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      18h     NodeInstallerProgressing: 1 nodes are at revision 11; 2 nodes are at revision 13
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-config                             4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   False       True          True       16h     Cluster not available for [{operator 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532}]: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]
marketplace                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
monitoring                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          True       19h     DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" rollout is not making progress - last change 2022-09-20T14:16:13Z...
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
openshift-samples                          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      19h     ManilaCSIDriverOperatorCRProgressing: ManilaDriverNodeServiceControllerProgressing: Waiting for DaemonSet to deploy node pods...

[0] http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1074531

Actual results:

OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 upgrade fails.

Expected results:

OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 upgrade success.

Additional info:

Attached logs of the NotReady node - [^journalctl_ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt.log.tar.gz]

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3422

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6668

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4851. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4850. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Kuryr might take a while to create Pods because it has to create Neutron ports for the pods. If a pod gets deleted while this is being processed, a
warning Event will be generated causing the "[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" to fail.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27621

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1448
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/703
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator/pull/464

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12956. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12910. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12904. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

In order to test proxy installations, the CI base image for OpenShift on OpenStack needs netcat.

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/7163

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-15643. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-15606. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-15497. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
I am using a BuildConfig with git source and the Docker strategy. The git repo contains a large zip file via LFS and that zip file is not getting downloaded. Instead just the ascii metadata is getting downloaded. I've created a simple reproducer (https://github.com/selrahal/buildconfig-git-lfs) on my personal github. If you clone the repo

git clone git@github.com:selrahal/buildconfig-git-lfs.git

and apply the bc.yaml file with

oc apply -f bc.yaml

Then start the build with

oc start-build test-git-lfs

You will see the build fails at the unzip step in the docker file

STEP 3/7: RUN unzip migrationtoolkit-mta-cli-5.3.0-offline.zip
End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the
latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on
the last disk(s) of this archive.

I've attached the full build logs to this issue.

• https://github.com/openshift/builder/pull/354

Description of problem:
Cannot scale up worker node have deploying OCP 4.11.1 cluster via UPI on Azure

5h2m Warning FailedCreate machine/pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4 InvalidConfiguration: failed to reconcile machine "pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4": failed to create vm pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: failure sending request for machine pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=404 - Original Error: Code="NotFound" Message="The Image '/subscriptions/e639e479-2737-4b3d-b338-f1928f6429a1/resourceGroups/mlpipe-2163-azpln-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/pokus-2knkh-gen2' cannot be found in 'northeurope' region."

Customer would like to have the installer create machineset from the inital installation, therefore Kubernetes manifest files that define the worker machines were not removed during the installation.

Highlights:
Can I please let help verifying if these are the correct steps to have the initial installation created and manage the worker machines?Is there an explanation on how changing the image to -gen2 in [concat(parameters('baseName'),'-gen2')] from the 02_storage.json template can resolve the problem?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Environment:
OCP 4.11.1 UPI install on Azure using ARM
VM size:
bootstrap: Standard_D4s_v3
master: Standard_D4s_v3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Following the step described in the document: Installing a cluster on Azure using ARM templates .

In the install-config.yaml, worker replicas was set to 0

compute:
- architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: worker
  platform: {}
  replicas: 3   
controlPlane:
  architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: master
  platform: {}
  replicas: 3

After creating the manifests described in this step: Creating the Kubernetes manifest and Ignition config files only control plane machines manifests were removed, worker machines manifests remain untouchedAfter three masters and three worker nodes were created by ARM templates, additional worker were added using machine sets via command

oc scale --replicas=1 machineset cluster-g7rzv-worker-francecentral1 -n openshift-machine-api` 

Actual results:
No addition node visible from `oc get nodes` and the following error occur:

5h2m Warning FailedCreate machine/pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4 InvalidConfiguration: failed to reconcile machine "pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4": failed to create vm pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: failure sending request for machine pokus-2knkh-worker-northeurope1-f6kc4: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=404 - Original Error: Code="NotFound" Message="The Image '/subscriptions/e639e479-2737-4b3d-b338-f1928f6429a1/resourceGroups/mlpipe-2163-azpln-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/pokus-2knkh-gen2' cannot be found in 'northeurope' region."

The customer found out that this can be resolved if changing the -image to -gen2 in [concat(parameters('baseName'),'-gen2')] from the 02_storage.json template

Expected results:
The installer should be able to create and manage machineset

Additional info:
SFDC case #03304526

Slack discussion, might due to MAO not able to support UPI in Azure Thread1, Thread2
 

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6681

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8286. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit is not properly reconciling the state, when a MachineHealthCheck is failing because of unhealthy Machines but then is removed.

When doing two MachineSet (called blue and green and only one has running Machines at a specific point in time) with MachineAutoscaler and MachineHealthCheck, the mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit will continue to report 1 for MachineHealth that actually was removed because of a switch from blue to green.

$ oc get machineset | egrep 'blue|green'
housiocp4-wvqbx-worker-blue-us-east-2a    0         0                             2d17h
housiocp4-wvqbx-worker-green-us-east-2a   1         1         1       1           2d17h

$ oc get machineautoscaler
NAME                      REF KIND     REF NAME                                   MIN   MAX   AGE
worker-green-us-east-1a   MachineSet   housiocp4-wvqbx-worker-green-us-east-2a   1     4     2d17h

$ oc get machinehealthcheck
NAME                              MAXUNHEALTHY   EXPECTEDMACHINES   CURRENTHEALTHY
machine-api-termination-handler   100%           0                  0
worker-green-us-east-1a           40%            1                  1

      {
        "name": "machine-health-check-unterminated-short-circuit",
        "file": "/etc/prometheus/rules/prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0/openshift-machine-api-machine-api-operator-prometheus-rules-ccb650d9-6fc4-422b-90bb-70452f4aff8f.yaml",
        "rules": [
          { 
            "state": "firing",
            "name": "MachineHealthCheckUnterminatedShortCircuit",
            "query": "mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit == 1",
            "duration": 1800,
            "labels": {
              "severity": "warning"
            },
            "annotations": {
              "description": "The number of unhealthy machines has exceeded the `maxUnhealthy` limit for the check, you should check\nthe status of machines in the cluster.\n",
              "summary": "machine health check {{ $labels.name }} has been disabled by short circuit for more than 30 minutes"
            },
            "alerts": [
              { 
                "labels": {
                  "alertname": "MachineHealthCheckUnterminatedShortCircuit",
                  "container": "kube-rbac-proxy-mhc-mtrc",
                  "endpoint": "mhc-mtrc",
                  "exported_namespace": "openshift-machine-api",
                  "instance": "10.128.0.58:8444",
                  "job": "machine-api-controllers",
                  "name": "worker-blue-us-east-1a",
                  "namespace": "openshift-machine-api",
                  "pod": "machine-api-controllers-779dcb8769-8gcn6",
                  "service": "machine-api-controllers",
                  "severity": "warning"
                },
                "annotations": {
                  "description": "The number of unhealthy machines has exceeded the `maxUnhealthy` limit for the check, you should check\nthe status of machines in the cluster.\n",
                  "summary": "machine health check worker-blue-us-east-1a has been disabled by short circuit for more than 30 minutes"
                },
                "state": "firing",
                "activeAt": "2022-12-09T15:59:25.1287541Z",
                "value": "1e+00"
              }
            ],
            "health": "ok",
            "evaluationTime": 0.000648129,
            "lastEvaluation": "2022-12-12T09:35:55.140174009Z",
            "type": "alerting"
          }
        ],
        "interval": 30,
        "limit": 0,
        "evaluationTime": 0.000661589,
        "lastEvaluation": "2022-12-12T09:35:55.140165629Z"
      },

As we can see above, worker-blue-us-east-1a is no longer available and active but rather worker-green-us-east-1a. But worker-blue-us-east-1a was there before the switch to green has happen and was actuall reporting some unhealthy Machines. But since it's now gone, mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit should properly reconcile as otherwise this is a false/positive alert.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OpenShift Container Platform 4.12.0-rc.3 (but is also seen on previous version)

How reproducible:

- Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup OpenShift Container Platform 4 on AWS for example
2. Create blue and green MachineSet with MachineAutoScaler and MachineHealthCheck
3. Have active Machines for blue only
4. Trigger unhealthy Machines in blue MachineSet
5. Switch to green MachineSet, by removing MachineHealthCheck, MachineAutoscaler and setting replicate of blue MachineSet to 0
6. Create green MachineHealthCheck, MachineAutoscaler and scale geen MachineSet to 1
7. Observe how mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit continues to report unhealthy state for blue MachineHealthCheck which no longer exists.

Actual results:

mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit reporting problematic MachineHealthCheck even though the faulty MachineHealthCheck does no longer exist.

Expected results:

mapi_machinehealthcheck_short_circuit to properly reconcile it's state and remove MachineHealthChecks that have been removed on OpenShift Container Platform level

Additional info:

It kind of looks like similar to the issue reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013528 respectively https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047702 (although https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047702 may not be super relevant)

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/pull/1124

Description of problem:

During restart egress firewall acls will be deleted and re-created from scratch, meaning that egress firewall rules won't be applied for some time during restart

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1560

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7437. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5547. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
This is a follow-up on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 and https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390

When creating a Knative Service and delete it again with enabled option "Delete other resources created by console" (only available on 4.13+ with the PR above) the secret "$name-github-webhook-secret" is not deleted.

When the user tries to create the same Knative Service again this fails with an error:

An error occurred
secrets "nodeinfo-github-webhook-secret" already exists

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.13

(we might want to backport this together with https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390 and OCPBUGS-5548)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OpenShift Serverless operator (tested with 1.26.0)
2. Create a new project
3. Navigate to Add > Import from git and create an application
4. In the topology select the Knative Service > "Delete Service" (not Delete App)

Actual results:
Deleted resources:

1. Knative Service (tries it twice!) $name
2. ImageStream $name
3. BuildConfig $name
4. Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret

Expected results:
Should also remove this resource

1. Delete Knative Service should be called just once
2. Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

Additional info:
When delete the whole application all the resources are deleted correctly (and just once)!

1. Knative Service (just once!) $name
2. ImageStream $name
3. BuildConfig $name
4. Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret
5. Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12602

Description of problem:

This is a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074299 for backporting purposes.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6652

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10977. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10890. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10649. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

After a replace upgrade from OCP 4.14 image to another 4.14 image first node is in NotReady.

jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$ oc get node --kubeconfig=hostedcluster.kubeconfig 
NAME                     STATUS   ROLES  AGE   VERSION
ip-10-0-128-175.us-east-2.compute.internal  Ready   worker  72m   v1.26.2+06e8c46
ip-10-0-134-164.us-east-2.compute.internal  Ready   worker  68m   v1.26.2+06e8c46
ip-10-0-137-194.us-east-2.compute.internal  Ready   worker  77m   v1.26.2+06e8c46
ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal  NotReady  worker  9m54s  v1.26.2+06e8c46

- lastHeartbeatTime: "2023-03-21T19:48:46Z"
  lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:42:37Z"
  message: 'container runtime network not ready: NetworkReady=false reason:NetworkPluginNotReady
   message:Network plugin returns error: No CNI configuration file in /etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/.
   Has your network provider started?'
  reason: KubeletNotReady
  status: "False"
  type: Ready

Events:
 Type   Reason          Age         From          Message
 ----   ------          ----        ----          -------
 Normal  Starting         11m         kubelet        Starting kubelet.
 Normal  NodeHasSufficientMemory 11m (x2 over 11m)  kubelet        Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal status is now: NodeHasSufficientMemory
 Normal  NodeHasNoDiskPressure  11m (x2 over 11m)  kubelet        Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal status is now: NodeHasNoDiskPressure
 Normal  NodeHasSufficientPID   11m (x2 over 11m)  kubelet        Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal status is now: NodeHasSufficientPID
 Normal  NodeAllocatableEnforced 11m         kubelet        Updated Node Allocatable limit across pods
 Normal  Synced          11m         cloud-node-controller Node synced successfully
 Normal  RegisteredNode      11m         node-controller    Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal event: Registered Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal in Controller
 Warning ErrorReconcilingNode   17s (x30 over 11m) controlplane      nodeAdd: error adding node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal": could not find "k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets" annotation

ovnkube-master log:

I0321 20:55:16.270197       1 default_network_controller.go:667] Node add failed for ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal, will try again later: nodeAdd: error adding node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal": could not find "k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets" annotation
I0321 20:55:16.270209       1 obj_retry.go:326] Retry add failed for *v1.Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal, will try again later: nodeAdd: error adding node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal": could not find "k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets" annotation
I0321 20:55:16.270273       1 event.go:285] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Node", Namespace:"", Name:"ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal", UID:"621e6289-ca5a-4e17-afff-5b49961cfb38", APIVersion:"v1", ResourceVersion:"52970", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'ErrorReconcilingNode' nodeAdd: error adding node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal": could not find "k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets" annotation
I0321 20:55:17.851497       1 master.go:719] Adding or Updating Node "ip-10-0-137-194.us-east-2.compute.internal"
I0321 20:55:25.965132       1 master.go:719] Adding or Updating Node "ip-10-0-128-175.us-east-2.compute.internal"
I0321 20:55:45.928694       1 client.go:783]  "msg"="transacting operations" "database"="OVN_Northbound" "operations"="[{Op:update Table:NB_Global Row:map[options:{GoMap:map[e2e_timestamp:1679432145 mac_prefix:2e:f9:d8 max_tunid:16711680 northd_internal_version:23.03.1-20.27.0-70.6 northd_probe_interval:5000 svc_monitor_mac:fe:cb:72:cf:f8:5f use_logical_dp_groups:true]}] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {c8b24290-296e-44a2-a4d0-02db7e312614}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}]"
I0321 20:55:46.270129       1 obj_retry.go:265] Retry object setup: *v1.Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal
I0321 20:55:46.270154       1 obj_retry.go:319] Adding new object: *v1.Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal
I0321 20:55:46.270164       1 master.go:719] Adding or Updating Node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal"
I0321 20:55:46.270201       1 default_network_controller.go:667] Node add failed for ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal, will try again later: nodeAdd: error adding node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal": could not find "k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets" annotation
I0321 20:55:46.270209       1 obj_retry.go:326] Retry add failed for *v1.Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal, will try again later: nodeAdd: error adding node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal": could not find "k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets" annotation
I0321 20:55:46.270284       1 event.go:285] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Node", Namespace:"", Name:"ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal", UID:"621e6289-ca5a-4e17-afff-5b49961cfb38", APIVersion:"v1", ResourceVersion:"52970", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'ErrorReconcilingNode' nodeAdd: error adding node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal": could not find "k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets" annotation
I0321 20:55:52.916512       1 reflector.go:559] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Namespace total 5 items received
I0321 20:56:06.910669       1 reflector.go:559] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Pod total 12 items received
I0321 20:56:15.928505       1 client.go:783]  "msg"="transacting operations" "database"="OVN_Northbound" "operations"="[{Op:update Table:NB_Global Row:map[options:{GoMap:map[e2e_timestamp:1679432175 mac_prefix:2e:f9:d8 max_tunid:16711680 northd_internal_version:23.03.1-20.27.0-70.6 northd_probe_interval:5000 svc_monitor_mac:fe:cb:72:cf:f8:5f use_logical_dp_groups:true]}] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {c8b24290-296e-44a2-a4d0-02db7e312614}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}]"
I0321 20:56:16.269611       1 obj_retry.go:265] Retry object setup: *v1.Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal
I0321 20:56:16.269637       1 obj_retry.go:319] Adding new object: *v1.Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal
I0321 20:56:16.269646       1 master.go:719] Adding or Updating Node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal"
I0321 20:56:16.269688       1 default_network_controller.go:667] Node add failed for ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal, will try again later: nodeAdd: error adding node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal": could not find "k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets" annotation
I0321 20:56:16.269697       1 obj_retry.go:326] Retry add failed for *v1.Node ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal, will try again later: nodeAdd: error adding node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal": could not find "k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets" annotation
I0321 20:56:16.269724       1 event.go:285] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Node", Namespace:"", Name:"ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal", UID:"621e6289-ca5a-4e17-afff-5b49961cfb38", APIVersion:"v1", ResourceVersion:"52970", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'ErrorReconcilingNode' nodeAdd: error adding node "ip-10-0-141-231.us-east-2.compute.internal": could not find "k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets" annotation

cluster-network-operator log:

I0321 21:03:38.487602       1 log.go:198] Set operator conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  status: "False"
  type: ManagementStateDegraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:53:10Z"
  message: DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" rollout is not making
    progress - last change 2023-03-21T19:42:39Z
  reason: RolloutHung
  status: "True"
  type: Degraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  status: "True"
  type: Upgradeable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:42:39Z"
  message: |-
    DaemonSet "/openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-multus/multus" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-multus/network-metrics-daemon" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
  reason: Deploying
  status: "True"
  type: Progressing
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:26Z"
  status: "True"
  type: Available
I0321 21:03:38.488312       1 log.go:198] Skipping reconcile of Network.operator.openshift.io: spec unchanged
I0321 21:03:38.499825       1 log.go:198] Set ClusterOperator conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  status: "False"
  type: ManagementStateDegraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:53:10Z"
  message: DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" rollout is not making
    progress - last change 2023-03-21T19:42:39Z
  reason: RolloutHung
  status: "True"
  type: Degraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  status: "True"
  type: Upgradeable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:42:39Z"
  message: |-
    DaemonSet "/openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-multus/multus" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-multus/network-metrics-daemon" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
  reason: Deploying
  status: "True"
  type: Progressing
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:26Z"
  status: "True"
  type: Available
I0321 21:03:38.571013       1 log.go:198] Set HostedControlPlane conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:38:24Z"
  message: All is well
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: ValidAWSIdentityProvider
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:37:06Z"
  message: Configuration passes validation
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: ValidHostedControlPlaneConfiguration
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:24:24Z"
  message: ""
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: QuorumAvailable
  status: "True"
  type: EtcdAvailable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:38:23Z"
  message: Kube APIServer deployment is available
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: KubeAPIServerAvailable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T20:26:29Z"
  message: ""
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "False"
  type: Degraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:37:11Z"
  message: All is well
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: InfrastructureReady
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:37:06Z"
  message: External DNS is not configured
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: StatusUnknown
  status: Unknown
  type: ExternalDNSReachable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:24:24Z"
  message: ""
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: Available
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:37:06Z"
  message: Reconciliation active on resource
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: ReconciliationActive
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:38:25Z"
  message: All is well
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: AWSDefaultSecurityGroupCreated
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:30:54Z"
  message: 'Error while reconciling 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-20-201450: the cluster
    operator network is degraded'
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: ClusterOperatorDegraded
  status: "False"
  type: ClusterVersionProgressing
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:11Z"
  message: Condition not found in the CVO.
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: StatusUnknown
  status: Unknown
  type: ClusterVersionUpgradeable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:44:05Z"
  message: Done applying 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-20-201450
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: FromClusterVersion
  status: "True"
  type: ClusterVersionAvailable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:55:15Z"
  message: Cluster operator network is degraded
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: ClusterOperatorDegraded
  status: "True"
  type: ClusterVersionFailing
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:11Z"
  message: Payload loaded version="4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-20-201450" image="registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-20-201450"
    architecture="amd64"
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: PayloadLoaded
  status: "True"
  type: ClusterVersionReleaseAccepted
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  message: ""
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "False"
  type: network.operator.openshift.io/ManagementStateDegraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:53:10Z"
  message: DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" rollout is not making
    progress - last change 2023-03-21T19:42:39Z
  reason: RolloutHung
  status: "True"
  type: network.operator.openshift.io/Degraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  message: ""
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: network.operator.openshift.io/Upgradeable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:42:39Z"
  message: |-
    DaemonSet "/openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-multus/multus" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-multus/network-metrics-daemon" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
  reason: Deploying
  status: "True"
  type: network.operator.openshift.io/Progressing
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:27Z"
  message: ""
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: network.operator.openshift.io/Available
I0321 21:03:39.450912       1 pod_watcher.go:125] Operand /, Kind= openshift-multus/multus updated, re-generating status
I0321 21:03:39.450953       1 pod_watcher.go:125] Operand /, Kind= openshift-multus/multus updated, re-generating status
I0321 21:03:39.493206       1 log.go:198] Set operator conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  status: "False"
  type: ManagementStateDegraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:53:10Z"
  message: DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" rollout is not making
    progress - last change 2023-03-21T19:42:39Z
  reason: RolloutHung
  status: "True"
  type: Degraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  status: "True"
  type: Upgradeable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:42:39Z"
  message: |-
    DaemonSet "/openshift-multus/network-metrics-daemon" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
  reason: Deploying
  status: "True"
  type: Progressing
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:26Z"
  status: "True"
  type: Available
I0321 21:03:39.494050       1 log.go:198] Skipping reconcile of Network.operator.openshift.io: spec unchanged
I0321 21:03:39.508538       1 log.go:198] Set ClusterOperator conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  status: "False"
  type: ManagementStateDegraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:53:10Z"
  message: DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" rollout is not making
    progress - last change 2023-03-21T19:42:39Z
  reason: RolloutHung
  status: "True"
  type: Degraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  status: "True"
  type: Upgradeable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:42:39Z"
  message: |-
    DaemonSet "/openshift-multus/network-metrics-daemon" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
  reason: Deploying
  status: "True"
  type: Progressing
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:26Z"
  status: "True"
  type: Available
I0321 21:03:39.684429       1 log.go:198] Set HostedControlPlane conditions:
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:38:24Z"
  message: All is well
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: ValidAWSIdentityProvider
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:37:06Z"
  message: Configuration passes validation
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: ValidHostedControlPlaneConfiguration
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:24:24Z"
  message: ""
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: QuorumAvailable
  status: "True"
  type: EtcdAvailable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:38:23Z"
  message: Kube APIServer deployment is available
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: KubeAPIServerAvailable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T20:26:29Z"
  message: ""
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "False"
  type: Degraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:37:11Z"
  message: All is well
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: InfrastructureReady
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:37:06Z"
  message: External DNS is not configured
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: StatusUnknown
  status: Unknown
  type: ExternalDNSReachable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:24:24Z"
  message: ""
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: Available
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:37:06Z"
  message: Reconciliation active on resource
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: ReconciliationActive
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:38:25Z"
  message: All is well
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: AWSDefaultSecurityGroupCreated
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:30:54Z"
  message: 'Error while reconciling 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-20-201450: the cluster
    operator network is degraded'
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: ClusterOperatorDegraded
  status: "False"
  type: ClusterVersionProgressing
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:11Z"
  message: Condition not found in the CVO.
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: StatusUnknown
  status: Unknown
  type: ClusterVersionUpgradeable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:44:05Z"
  message: Done applying 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-20-201450
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: FromClusterVersion
  status: "True"
  type: ClusterVersionAvailable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:55:15Z"
  message: Cluster operator network is degraded
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: ClusterOperatorDegraded
  status: "True"
  type: ClusterVersionFailing
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:11Z"
  message: Payload loaded version="4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-20-201450" image="registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-20-201450"
    architecture="amd64"
  observedGeneration: 3
  reason: PayloadLoaded
  status: "True"
  type: ClusterVersionReleaseAccepted
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  message: ""
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "False"
  type: network.operator.openshift.io/ManagementStateDegraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:53:10Z"
  message: DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" rollout is not making
    progress - last change 2023-03-21T19:42:39Z
  reason: RolloutHung
  status: "True"
  type: network.operator.openshift.io/Degraded
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:21Z"
  message: ""
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: network.operator.openshift.io/Upgradeable
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T19:42:39Z"
  message: |-
    DaemonSet "/openshift-multus/network-metrics-daemon" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
    DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)
  reason: Deploying
  status: "True"
  type: network.operator.openshift.io/Progressing
- lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-21T17:39:27Z"
  message: ""
  reason: AsExpected
  status: "True"
  type: network.operator.openshift.io/Available

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1. management cluster 4.13
2. bring up the hostedcluster and nodepool in 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-19-234132
3. upgrade the hostedcluster to 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-20-201450 
4. replace upgrade the nodepool to 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-20-201450 

Actual results

First node is in NotReady

Expected results:

All nodes should be Ready

Additional info:

No issue with replace upgrade from 4.13 to 4.14

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1780

Description of problem:

We need to have admin-ack in 4.11 so that admins can check the deprecated APIs and approve when they move to 4.12.Refer https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for  more information. As planned we want to add the admin-ack around 4.12 feature freeze. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a cluster in 4.11. 
2. Run an application which uses the deprecated API. See https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for more information.
3. Upgrade to 4.12

Actual results:

The upgrade happens without asking the admin to confirm that the worksloads do not use the deprecated APIs.

Expected results:

Upgrade should wait for the admin-ack.

Additional info:

We had admin-acks in the past too e.g. https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.9/updating/updating-cluster-prepare.html#update-preparing-migrate_updating-cluster-prepare

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/836

• https://github.com/openshift/aws-ebs-csi-driver/pull/209

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1821

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10622. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Unit test failing 

=== RUN   TestNewAppRunAll/app_generation_using_context_dir
    newapp_test.go:907: app generation using context dir: Error mismatch! Expected <nil>, got supplied context directory '2.0/test/rack-test-app' does not exist in 'https://github.com/openshift/sti-ruby'
    --- FAIL: TestNewAppRunAll/app_generation_using_context_dir (0.61s)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

100

Steps to Reproduce:

see for example https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_oc/1376/pull-ci-openshift-oc-master-images/1638172620648091648 

Actual results:

unit tests fail

Expected results:

TestNewAppRunAll unit test should pass

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1380

Description of problem:

If we use a macvlan with the configuration...
spec:
  config: '{ "cniVersion": "0.3.1", "name": "ran-bh-macvlan-test", "plugins": [ {"type": "macvlan","master": "vlan306", "mode": "bridge", "ipam": { "type": "whereabouts", "range": "2001:1b74:480:603d:0304:0403:000:0000-2001:1b74:480:603d:0304:0403:0000:0004/64","gateway": "2001:1b74:480:603d::1" } } ]}'

there is an error creating the pod:

  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  17s (x3 over 55s)  kubelet            (combined from similar events): Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_test31_test-ecoloma-01_a593bd0a-83e7-4d31-857e-0c31491e849e_0(5cf36bd99ffa532fd34735e68caecfbc69d820ba6cb04e348c9f9f168498022f): error adding pod test-ecoloma-01_test31 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": [test-ecoloma-01/test31:ran-bh-macvlan-test]: error adding container to network "ran-bh-macvlan-test": Error at storage engine: OverlappingRangeIPReservation.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io "2001-1b74-480-603d-304-403--" is invalid: metadata.name: Invalid value: "2001-1b74-480-603d-304-403--": a lowercase RFC 1123 subdomain must consist of lower case alphanumeric characters, '-' or '.', and must start and end with an alphanumeric character (e.g. 'example.com', regex used for validation is '[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?(\.[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?)*')
  
  
If we change the start IP address to 2001:1b74:480:603d:0304:0403:000:0001, it works ok ok.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

Always reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

1. See description of problem.

Actual results:

Unable to create pod

Expected results:

IP range should be valid and pod should get created

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/whereabouts-cni/pull/132

Description of problem:

[OVN][OSP] After reboot egress node, egress IP cannot be applied anymore.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-07-181244

How reproducible:

Frequently happened in automation. But didn't reproduce it in manual.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Label one node as egress node

2.
Config one egressIP object
STEP: Check  one EgressIP assigned in the object.

Nov  8 15:28:23.591: INFO: egressIPStatus: [{"egressIP":"192.168.54.72","node":"huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"}]

3.
Reboot the node, wait for the node ready.

Actual results:

EgressIP cannot be applied anymore. Waited more than 1 hour.
 oc get egressip
NAME             EGRESSIPS       ASSIGNED NODE   ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS
egressip-47031   192.168.54.72    

Expected results:

The egressIP should be applied correctly.

Additional info:

Some logs
E1108 07:29:41.849149       1 egressip.go:1635] No assignable nodes found for EgressIP: egressip-47031 and requested IPs: [192.168.54.72]
I1108 07:29:41.849288       1 event.go:285] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"EgressIP", Namespace:"", Name:"egressip-47031", UID:"", APIVersion:"", ResourceVersion:"", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'NoMatchingNodeFound' no assignable nodes for EgressIP: egressip-47031, please tag at least one node with label: k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable


W1108 07:33:37.401149       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:162] Could not connect to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107): context deadline exceeded
I1108 07:33:37.401348       1 master.go:1364] Adding or Updating Node "huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"
I1108 07:33:37.437465       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107)

After this log, seems like no logs related to "192.168.54.72" happened.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1445

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-212. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

oc --context build02 get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.12.0-ec.1   True        False         45h     Error while reconciling 4.12.0-ec.1: the cluster operator kube-controller-manager is degraded

oc --context build02 get co kube-controller-manager
NAME                      VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
kube-controller-manager   4.12.0-ec.1   True        False         True       2y87d   GarbageCollectorDegraded: error fetching rules: Get "https://thanos-querier.openshift-monitoring.svc:9091/api/v1/rules": dial tcp 172.30.153.28:9091: connect: cannot assign requested address

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

build02 is a build farm cluster in CI production.
I can provide credentials to access the cluster if needed.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/654

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8016. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1748. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

PipelineRun templates are currently fetched from `openshift-pipelines` namespace. It has to be fetched from `openshift` namespace.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11 and 1.8.1 OSP

Align with operator changes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVKP-2413 in 1.8.1, UI has to update the code to fetch pipelinerun templates from openshift namespace.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12827

Description of problem:

Manual backport of 
* https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/pull/336
* https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/pull/339

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/pull/347

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1417

The two modules that are auto generated for the CLI docs need to add ":_content-type: REFERENCE" to the top of the files. Update the doc generation templates to add these.

• https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1072

Description of problem:

[4.11.z] Fix kubevirt-console tests

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12325

• https://github.com/openshift/csi-driver-manila-operator/pull/177

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-858. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

In OCP 4.9, the package-server-manager was introduced to manage the packageserver CSV. However, when OCP 4.8 in upgraded to 4.9, the packageserver stays stuck in v0.17.0, which is the version in OCP 4.8, and v0.18.3 does not roll out, which is the version in OCP 4.9

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP 4.8

2. Upgrade to OCP 4.9 

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION                             AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.8.0-0.nightly-2022-08-31-160214   True        True          50m     Working towards 4.9.47: 619 of 738 done (83% complete)

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.9.47    True        False         4m26s   Cluster version is 4.9.47
 

Actual results:

Check packageserver CSV. It's in v0.17.0 

$ oc get csv  NAME            DISPLAY          VERSION   REPLACES   PHASE packageserver   Package Server   0.17.0               Succeeded 

Expected results:

packageserver CSV is at 0.18.3 

Additional info:

packageserver CSV version in 4.8: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.8/manifests/0000_50_olm_15-packageserver.clusterserviceversion.yaml#L12

packageserver CSV version in 4.9: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.9/pkg/manifests/csv.yaml#L8

• https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/pull/381

Our Prometheus alerts are inconsistent with both upstream and sometimes our own vendor folder. Let's do a clean update run before the next release is branched off.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/957

Description of problem:

When trying to add a Cisco UCS Rackmount server as a `baremetalhost` CR the following error comes up in the metal3 container log in the openshift-machine-api namespace.

'TransferProtocolType' property which is mandatory to complete the action is missing in the request body

Full log entry:

{"level":"info","ts":1677155695.061805,"logger":"provisioner.ironic","msg":"current provision state","host":"ucs-rackmounts~ocp-test-1","lastError":"Deploy step deploy.deploy failed with BadRequestError: HTTP POST https://10.5.4.78/redfish/v1/Managers/CIMC/VirtualMedia/0/Actions/VirtualMedia.InsertMedia returned code 400. Base.1.4.0.GeneralError: 'TransferProtocolType' property which is mandatory to complete the action is missing in the request body. Extended information: [{'@odata.type': 'Message.v1_0_6.Message', 'MessageId': 'Base.1.4.0.GeneralError', 'Message': "'TransferProtocolType' property which is mandatory to complete the action is missing in the request body.", 'MessageArgs': [], 'Severity': 'Critical'}].","current":"deploy failed","target":"active"}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

    image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:30328143480d6598d0b52d41a6b755bb0f4dfe04c4b7aa7aefd02ea793a2c52b
    imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
    name: metal3-ironic

How reproducible:

Adding a Cisco UCS Rackmount with Redfish enabled as a baremetalhost to metal3

Steps to Reproduce:

1. The address to use: redfish-virtualmedia://10.5.4.78/redfish/v1/Systems/WZP22100SBV

Actual results:

[baelen@baelen-jumphost mce]$ oc get baremetalhosts.metal3.io  -n ucs-rackmounts  ocp-test-1
NAME         STATE          CONSUMER   ONLINE   ERROR                AGE
ocp-test-1   provisioning              true     provisioning error   23h

Expected results:

For the provisioning to be successfull.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/pull/369

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12835

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7633. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1125. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
(originally reported in BZ as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983200)

test:
[sig-etcd][Feature:DisasterRecovery][Disruptive] [Feature:EtcdRecovery] Cluster should restore itself after quorum loss [Serial]

is failing frequently in CI, see search results:
https://search.ci.openshift.org/?maxAge=168h&context=1&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job&search=%5C%5Bsig-etcd%5C%5D%5C%5BFeature%3ADisasterRecovery%5C%5D%5C%5BDisruptive%5C%5D+%5C%5BFeature%3AEtcdRecovery%5C%5D+Cluster+should+restore+itself+after+quorum+loss+%5C%5BSerial%5C%5D

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-disruptive-4.8/1413625606435770368
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-disruptive-4.8/1415075413717159936

—

some brief triaging from Thomas Jungblut on:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-disruptive-4.11/1568747321334697984

it seems the last guard pod doesn't come up, etcd operator installs this properly and the revision installer also does not spout any errors. It just doesn't progress to the latest revision. At first glance doesn't look like an issue with etcd itself, but needs to be taken a closer look at for sure.

• https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27735

Description of problem:

The test local-test is failing on openshift/thanos when upgrading golang version to 1.18 on the branch release-4.11.

Please refer to this test log for details:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_thanos/82/pull-ci-openshift-thanos-release-4.11-test-local/1541516614497734656

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

See local-test job on pull request on the repository Openshift/Thanos

Steps to Reproduce:

Actual results:

local-test fails on the following error:
level=error ts=2022-06-27T20:28:12.306Z caller=web.go:99 component=web msg="panic while serving request" client=127.0.0.1:37064 url=/api/v1/metadata err="runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" stack="goroutine 278 [running]:\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web.withStackTracer.func1.1()\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/web.go:98 +0x99\npanic({0x1c34760, 0x308ad40})\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:838 +0x207\nreflect.mapiternext(0xc000458540?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/map.go:1378 +0x19\ngithub.com/modern-go/reflect2.(*UnsafeMapIterator).UnsafeNext(0x1bd62e0?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/modern-go/reflect2@v1.0.1/unsafe_map.go:136 +0x32\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*sortKeysMapEncoder).Encode(0xc000949d10, 0xc0002966b0, 0xc0006c7740)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect_map.go:297 +0x31a\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*onePtrEncoder).Encode(0xc0008cb120, 0xc000948fc0, 0xc0001139c0?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect.go:219 +0x82\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*Stream).WriteVal(0xc0006c7740, {0x1c16da0, 0xc000948fc0})\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect.go:98 +0x158\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*dynamicEncoder).Encode(0xc00094cd58?, 0xfa9a07?, 0xc0006c7758?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect_dynamic.go:15 +0x39\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*structFieldEncoder).Encode(0xc000949620, 0x1a4aaba?, 0xc0006c7740)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect_struct_encoder.go:110 +0x56\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*structEncoder).Encode(0xc000949740, 0x0?, 0xc0006c7740)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect_struct_encoder.go:158 +0x652\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*OptionalEncoder).Encode(0xc0001afd60?, 0x0?, 0x0?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect_optional.go:74 +0xa4\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*onePtrEncoder).Encode(0xc0008cad40, 0xc0006c76e0, 0xc000949020?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect.go:219 +0x82\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*Stream).WriteVal(0xc0006c7740, {0x1ac56e0, 0xc0006c76e0})\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/reflect.go:98 +0x158\ngithub.com/json-iterator/go.(*frozenConfig).Marshal(0xc0001afd60, {0x1ac56e0, 0xc0006c76e0})\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/json-iterator/go@v1.1.9/config.go:299 +0xc9\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web/api/v1.(*API).respond(0xc0002d7a40, {0x229a448, 0xc00022bd60}, {0x1c16da0?, 0xc000948fc0}, {0x0?, 0x7fe5a05a5b20?, 0x20?})\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/api/v1/api.go:1437 +0x162\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web/api/v1.(*API).Register.func1.1({0x229a448, 0xc00022bd60}, 0x7fe5982c5300?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/api/v1/api.go:273 +0x20b\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x7fe5982c5300?, {0x229a448?, 0xc00022bd60?}, 0xc00072b270?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/util/httputil.CompressionHandler.ServeHTTP({{0x2290780?, 0xc000856288?}}, {0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b270?}, 0x228fb20?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/util/httputil/compression.go:90 +0x69\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web.(*Handler).testReady.func1({0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b270?}, 0x7fe5982c5300?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/web.go:499 +0x39\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x7fe5982c5300?, {0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b270?}, 0x50?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\ngithub.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promhttp.InstrumentHandlerResponseSize.func1({0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b220?}, 0xc000250c00)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/client_golang@v1.6.0/prometheus/promhttp/instrument_server.go:196 +0xa5\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x228fb80?, {0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b220?}, 0xc000948ed0?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\ngithub.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promhttp.InstrumentHandlerDuration.func2({0x7fe5982c5300, 0xc00072b220}, 0xc000250c00)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/client_golang@v1.6.0/prometheus/promhttp/instrument_server.go:76 +0xa2\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x22a4a68?, {0x7fe5982c5300?, 0xc00072b220?}, 0x0?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\ngithub.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promhttp.InstrumentHandlerCounter.func1({0x22a4a68?, 0xc00072b1d0?}, 0xc000250c00)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/client_golang@v1.6.0/prometheus/promhttp/instrument_server.go:100 +0x94\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web.setPathWithPrefix.func1.1({0x22a4a68, 0xc00072b1d0}, 0xc000250b00)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/web.go:1142 +0x290\ngithub.com/prometheus/common/route.(*Router).handle.func1({0x22a4a68, 0xc00072b1d0}, 0xc000250a00, {0x0, 0x0, 0xc00022c364?})\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/common@v0.10.0/route/route.go:83 +0x2ae\ngithub.com/julienschmidt/httprouter.(*Router).ServeHTTP(0xc0001cc780, {0x22a4a68, 0xc00072b1d0}, 0xc000250a00)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/julienschmidt/httprouter@v1.3.0/router.go:387 +0x82b\ngithub.com/prometheus/common/route.(*Router).ServeHTTP(0x8?, {0x22a4a68?, 0xc00072b1d0?}, 0x203000?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/common@v0.10.0/route/route.go:121 +0x26\nnet/http.StripPrefix.func1({0x22a4a68, 0xc00072b1d0}, 0xc000250900)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2127 +0x330\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x10?, {0x22a4a68?, 0xc00072b1d0?}, 0x7fe5c8423f18?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\nnet/http.(*ServeMux).ServeHTTP(0x413d87?, {0x22a4a68, 0xc00072b1d0}, 0xc000250900)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2462 +0x149\ngithub.com/opentracing-contrib/go-stdlib/nethttp.MiddlewareFunc.func5({0x22a3808?, 0xc000a282a0}, 0xc000250200)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/opentracing-contrib/go-stdlib@v0.0.0-20190519235532-cf7a6c988dc9/nethttp/server.go:140 +0x662\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x0?, {0x22a3808?, 0xc000a282a0?}, 0xffffffffffffffff?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\ngithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/web.withStackTracer.func1({0x22a3808?, 0xc000a282a0?}, 0xc0008ca850?)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/prometheus/prometheus@v1.8.2-0.20200724121523-657ba532e42f/web/web.go:103 +0x97\nnet/http.HandlerFunc.ServeHTTP(0x0?, {0x22a3808?, 0xc000a282a0?}, 0xc000100000?)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2084 +0x2f\nnet/http.serverHandler.ServeHTTP({0xc000c55380?}, {0x22a3808, 0xc000a282a0}, 0xc000250200)\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:2916 +0x43b\nnet/http.(*conn).serve(0xc0000d1540, {0x22a4e18, 0xc00061a0c0})\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:1966 +0x5d7\ncreated by net/http.(*Server).Serve\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/net/http/server.go:3071 +0x4db\n"
level=error ts=2022-06-27T20:28:12.306Z caller=stdlib.go:89 component=web caller="http: panic serving 127.0.0.1:37064" msg="runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference"

Expected results:

local-test does no fail on the error above.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/thanos/pull/87

Description of problem:

Similar to OCPBUGS-11636 ccoctl needs to be updated to account for the s3 bucket changes described in https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/heads-up-amazon-s3-security-changes-are-coming-in-april-of-2023/

these changes have rolled out to us-east-2 and China regions as of today and will roll out to additional regions in the near future

See OCPBUGS-11636 for additional information

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Reproducible in affected regions.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Use "ccoctl aws create-all" flow to create STS infrastructure in an affected region like us-east-2. Notice that document upload fails because the s3 bucket is created in a state that does not allow usage of ACLs with the s3 bucket.

Actual results:

./ccoctl aws create-all --name abutchertestue2 --region us-east-2 --credentials-requests-dir ./credrequests --output-dir _output
2023/04/11 13:01:06 Using existing RSA keypair found at _output/serviceaccount-signer.private
2023/04/11 13:01:06 Copying signing key for use by installer
2023/04/11 13:01:07 Bucket abutchertestue2-oidc created
2023/04/11 13:01:07 Failed to create Identity provider: failed to upload discovery document in the S3 bucket abutchertestue2-oidc: AccessControlListNotSupported: The bucket does not allow ACLs
        status code: 400, request id: 2TJKZC6C909WVRK7, host id: zQckCPmozx+1yEhAj+lnJwvDY9rG14FwGXDnzKIs8nQd4fO4xLWJW3p9ejhFpDw3c0FE2Ggy1Yc=

Expected results:

"ccoctl aws create-all" successfully creates IAM and S3 infrastructure. OIDC discovery and JWKS documents are successfully uploaded to the S3 bucket and are publicly accessible.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/530

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13013. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12854. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11550. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

`cluster-reader` ClusterRole should have ["get", "list", "watch"] permissions for a number of privileged CRs, but lacks them for the API Group "k8s.ovn.org", which includes CRs such as EgressFirewalls, EgressIPs, etc.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10 - 4.12 OVN

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a cluster with OVN components, e.g. EgressFirewall
2. Check permissions of ClusterRole `cluster-reader`

Actual results:

No permissions for OVN resources 

Expected results:

Get, list, and watch verb permissions for OVN resources

Additional info:

Looks like a similar bug was opened for "network-attachment-definitions" in OCPBUGS-6959 (whose closure is being contested).

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1811

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2508. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Installer fails due to Neutron policy error when creating Openstack servers for OCP master nodes.

$ oc get machines -A
NAMESPACE               NAME                          PHASE          TYPE   REGION   ZONE   AGE
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-0         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-1         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-master-2         Running                               23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-g7nrw   Provisioning                          23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb   Provisioning                          23h
openshift-machine-api   ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-vwrsk   Provisioning                          23h

$ oc -n openshift-machine-api logs machine-api-controllers-7454f5d65b-8fqx2 -c machine-controller
[...]
E1018 10:51:49.355143       1 controller.go:317] controller/machine_controller "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="error creating Openstack instance: Failed to create port err: Request forbidden: [POST https://overcloud.redhat.local:13696/v2.0/ports], error message: {\"NeutronError\": {\"type\": \"PolicyNotAuthorized\", \"message\": \"(rule:create_port and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address and rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address))) is disallowed by policy\", \"detail\": \"\"}}" "name"="ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb" "namespace"="openshift-machine-api"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install 4.10 within provider networks (in primary or secondary interface)

Actual results:

Installation failure:
4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020: some cluster operators have not yet rolled out

Expected results:

Successful installation

Additional info:

Please find must-gather for installation on primary interface link here and for installation on secondary interface link here.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/pull/248

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3111. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2992. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

The metal3-ironic container image in OKD fails during steps in configure-ironic.sh that look for additional Oslo configuration entries as environment variables to configure the Ironic instance. The mechanism by which it fails in OKD but not OpenShift is that the image for OpenShift happens to have unrelated variables set which match the regex, because it is based on the builder image, but the OKD image is based only on a stream8 image without these unrelated OS_ prefixed variables set.

The metal3 pod created in response to even a provisioningNetwork: Disabled Provisioning object will therefore crashloop indefinitely.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy OKD to a bare metal cluster using the assisted-service, with the OKD ConfigMap applied to podman play kube, as in :https://github.com/openshift/assisted-service/tree/master/deploy/podman#okd-configuration
2. Observe the state of the metal3 pod in the openshift-machine-api namespace.

Actual results:

The metal3-ironic container repeatedly exits with nonzero, with the logs ending here:

++ export IRONIC_URL_HOST=10.1.1.21
++ IRONIC_URL_HOST=10.1.1.21
++ export IRONIC_BASE_URL=https://10.1.1.21:6385
++ IRONIC_BASE_URL=https://10.1.1.21:6385
++ export IRONIC_INSPECTOR_BASE_URL=https://10.1.1.21:5050
++ IRONIC_INSPECTOR_BASE_URL=https://10.1.1.21:5050
++ '[' '!' -z '' ']'
++ '[' -f /etc/ironic/ironic.conf ']'
++ cp /etc/ironic/ironic.conf /etc/ironic/ironic.conf_orig
++ tee /etc/ironic/ironic.extra
# Options set from Environment variables
++ echo '# Options set from Environment variables'
++ env
++ grep '^OS_'
++ tee -a /etc/ironic/ironic.extra

Expected results:

The metal3-ironic container starts and the metal3 pod is reported as ready.

Additional info:

This is the PR that introduced pipefail to the downstream ironic-image, which is not yet accepted in the upstream:
https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/pull/267/files#diff-ab2b20df06f98d48f232d90f0b7aa464704257224862780635ec45b0ce8a26d4R3

This is the line that's failing:
https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/blob/4838a077d849070563b70761957178055d5d4517/scripts/configure-ironic.sh#L57

This is the image base that OpenShift uses for ironic-image (before rewriting in ci-operator):
https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/blob/4838a077d849070563b70761957178055d5d4517/Dockerfile.ocp#L9

Here is where the relevant environment variables are set in the builder images for OCP:
https://github.com/openshift/builder/blob/973602e0e576d7eccef4fc5810ba511405cd3064/hack/lib/build/version.sh#L87

Here is the final FROM line in the OKD image build (just stream8):
https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/blob/4838a077d849070563b70761957178055d5d4517/Dockerfile.okd#L9

This results in the following differences between the two images:
$ podman run --rm -it --entrypoint bash quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:519ac06836d972047f311de5e57914cf842716e22a1d916a771f02499e0f235c -c 'env | grep ^OS_'
OS_GIT_MINOR=11
OS_GIT_TREE_STATE=clean
OS_GIT_COMMIT=97530a7
OS_GIT_VERSION=4.11.0-202210061001.p0.g97530a7.assembly.stream-97530a7
OS_GIT_MAJOR=4
OS_GIT_PATCH=0
$ podman run --rm -it --entrypoint bash quay.io/openshift/okd-content@sha256:6b8401f8d84c4838cf0e7c598b126fdd920b6391c07c9409b1f2f17be6d6d5cb -c 'env | grep ^OS_'

Here is what the OS_ prefixed variables should be used for:
https://github.com/metal3-io/ironic-image/blob/807a120b4ce5e1675a79ebf3ee0bb817cfb1f010/README.md?plain=1#L36
https://opendev.org/openstack/oslo.config/src/commit/84478d83f87e9993625044de5cd8b4a18dfcaf5d/oslo_config/sources/_environment.py

It's worth noting that ironic.extra is not consumed anywhere, and is simply being used here to save off the variables that Oslo _might_ be consuming (it won't consume the variables that are present in the OCP builder image, though they do get caught by this regex).

With pipefail set, grep returns non-zero when it fails to find an environment variable that matches the regex, as in the case of the OKD ironic-image builds.

• https://github.com/openshift/ironic-image/pull/318

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4504. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1557. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Seen in an instance created recently by a 4.12.0-ec.2 GCP provider:

  "scheduling": {
    "automaticRestart": false,
    "onHostMaintenance": "MIGRATE",
    "preemptible": false,
    "provisioningModel": "STANDARD"
  },