Back to index

4.12.0-rc.4

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.59

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

There is a new driver release 5.0.0 since the last rebase that includes snapshot support:

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/releases/tag/v5.0.0

Rebase the driver on v5.0.0 and update the deployments in ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator.
There are no corresponding changes in ibm-vpc-node-label-updater since the last rebase.

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

This includes ibm-vpc-node-label-updater!

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The End of General support for vSphere 6.7 will be on October 15, 2022. So, vSphere 6.7 will be deprecated for 4.11.

We want to encourage vSphere customers to upgrade to vSphere 7 in OCP 4.11 since VMware is EOLing (general support) for vSphere 6.7 in Oct 2022.

We want the cluster Upgradeable=false + have a strong alert pointing to our docs / requirements.

related slack: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CH06KMDRV/p1647541493096729

Epic Goal

  • Enable the migration from a storage intree driver to a CSI based driver with minimal impact to the end user, applications and cluster
  • These migrations would include, but are not limited to:
    • CSI driver for AWS EBS
    • CSI driver for GCP
    • CSI driver for Azure (file and disk)
    • CSI driver for VMware vSphere

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

This Epic tracks the GA of this feature

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

OC mirror is GA product as of Openshift 4.11 .

The goal of this feature is to solve any future customer request for new features or capabilities in OC mirror 

Epic Goal

  • Mirror to mirror operations and custom mirroring flows required by IBM CloudPak catalog management

Why is this important?

  • IBM needs additional customization around the actual mirroring of images to enable CloudPaks to fully adopt OLM-style operator packaging and catalog management
  • IBM CloudPaks introduce additional compute architectures, increasing the download volume by 2/3rds to day, we need the ability to effectively filter non-required image versions of OLM operator catalogs during filtering for other customers that only require a single or a subset of the available image architectures
  • IBM CloudPaks regularly run on older OCP versions like 4.8 which require additional work to be able to read the mirrored catalog produced by oc mirror

Scenarios

  1. Customers can use the oc utility and delegate the actual image mirror step to another tool
  2. Customers can mirror between disconnected registries using the oc utility
  3. The oc utility supports filtering manifest lists in the context of multi-arch images according to the sparse manifest list proposal in the distribution spec

Acceptance Criteria

  • Customers can use the oc utility to mirror between two different air-gapped environments
  • Customers can specify the desired computer architectures and oc mirror will create sparse manifest lists in the target registry as a result

Dependencies (internal and external)

Previous Work:

  1. WRKLDS-369
  2. Disconnected Mirroring Improvement Proposal

Related Work:

  1. https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/pull/310
  2. https://github.com/distribution/distribution/pull/3536
  3. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10ozLoV7sVPLB8msLx4LYamooQDSW-CAnLiNiJ9SER2k/edit?usp=sharing

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

We plan to build Ironic Container Images using RHEL9 as base image in OCP 4.12

This is required because the ironic components have abandoned support for CentOS Stream 8 and Python 3.6/3.7 upstream during the most recent development cycle that will produce the stable Zed release, in favor of CentOS Stream 9 and Python 3.8/3.9

More info on RHEL8 to RHEL9 transition in OCP can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N8KyDY7KmgUYA9EOtDDQolebz0qi3nhT20IOn4D-xS4

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem? 

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb  

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)   

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

Description of problem:
When opening the Devfile sample developer catalog, switch the project in another browser tab, and then open devfile samples link in a new tab, the current project context is getting lost.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12, expecting that this happen also in older versions

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Switch to the developer perspective, navigate to Add > Samples
2. Open a new browser tab and create a new project
3. Ctrl+click a sample in the first tab.

Actual results:
The project has also changed in the "Import sample" page

Expected results:
The project should be used also for the new "Import sample" page

Additional info:
We had this issue earlier for other catalog entries. Other samples works already fine, just the Devfile sample links doesn't contain the current namespace.

Name: DNS
Description: Please change the "DNS" component to be a subcomponent "DNS" of the "Networking" component.

Component: change to "Networking".
Subcomponent: change to "DNS".

Existing fields (default assignee, default QA contact, default CC email list, etc.) should remain the same as they currently are.
Default Assignee: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Default QA Contact: hongli@redhat.com
Default CC List: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Additional Notes:
I filled in "Default CC email list" because the form validation would not permit me to omit it. However, it can be left empty in Bugzilla (it is currently empty).

If possible, we would like this change to be done prior to the Bugzilla-to-Jira migration to avoid the need to make the change after the migration.

Description of problem:

OCPBUGS-3499 and OCPBUGS-3501 both require a more recent version of openshift/library-go containing the shared validation and host-assignment logic.

Derrick got an "old and new refs are equal" on rebase error; this is similar to OCPBUGS-1899 but I think has a different root cause. In this case, when a manual rollback is performed via the bootloader, we've computed that there's an osimageurl diff between the expected and desired state, but actually the desired state is already set.

We just need to skip doing the rebase if we're already in the target state.

(A real root of this problem again is that the whole "current/desired config" thing is trying to track state independently of the bootloader...if we made node state == container image, all of that goes away. The MCO would understand that it got booted into a previous state)

Description of problem:

documentationBaseURL still points to 4.10

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-31-101631

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Check documentationBaseURL on 4.12 cluster: 
# oc get configmap console-config -n openshift-console -o yaml | grep documentationBaseURL
      documentationBaseURL: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.11/

2.
3.

Actual results:

1.documentationBaseURL is still pointing to 4.11

Expected results:

1.documentationBaseURL should point to 4.12

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4181. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

After configuring a webhook receiver in alertmanager to send alerts to an external tool, a customer noticed that when receiving alerts they have as source "https:///<console-url>" (notice the 3 /).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

https:///<console-url>

Expected results:

https://<console-url>

Additional info:

After investigating I discovered that the problem might be in the CMO code:

→ oc get Alertmanager main -o yaml | grep externalUrl
  externalUrl: https:/console-openshift-console.apps.jakumar-2022-11-27-224014.devcluster.openshift.com/monitoring
→ oc get Prometheus k8s -o yaml | grep externalUrl
  externalUrl: https:/console-openshift-console.apps.jakumar-2022-11-27-224014.devcluster.openshift.com/monitoring

Description of problem:

The current version of openshift/cluster-dns-operator vendors Kubernetes 1.24 packages.  OpenShift 4.12 is based on Kubernetes 1.25.  

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Check https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/blob/release-4.12/go.mod  

Actual results:

Kubernetes packages (k8s.io/api, k8s.io/apimachinery, and k8s.io/client-go) are at version v0.24.0.

Expected results:

Kubernetes packages are at version v0.25.0 or later.

Additional info:

Using old Kubernetes API and client packages brings risk of API compatibility issues.

Description of problem:

We got a feedback from the support team that it is confusing to see switch in the Notifications column for the Alerting rule which have no alerts associated to it as user can not silence the Alerting rule. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. oc apply -f https://gist.githubusercontent.com/vikram-raj/727629797eb9d9bfcfa2721cae2ade86/raw/7c2305e14115a1a4f4f88ebb74cdad32cbec4132/Alerting%2520rule%2520without%2520alert 
2. navigate to the Developer perspective Observe -> Alerts
3. Try to silence the VersionAlert alerting rule, nothing will happen 

Actual results:

Silence the alerting rule using the switch will do nothing

Expected results:

No switch for silence the alerting rule should be visible if no alerts are associated to the alerting rule.

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3277. The following is the description of the original issue:

I saw this occur one time when running installs in a continuous loop. This was with COMPaCT_IPV4 in a non-disconnected setup.

WaitForBootrapComplete shows it can't access the API

level=info msg=Unable to retrieve cluster metadata from Agent Rest API: no clusterID known for the cluster
level=debug msg=cluster is not registered in rest API
level=debug msg=infraenv is not registered in rest API

This is because create-cluster-and-infraenv.service failed

Failed Units: 2
  create-cluster-and-infraenv.service
  NetworkManager-wait-online.service

The agentbasedinstaller register command wasn't able to retrieve the image to get the version

Nov 03 23:03:24 master-0 create-cluster-and-infraenv[2702]: time="2022-11-03T23:03:24Z" level=error msg="command 'oc adm release info -o template --template '\{{.metadata.version}}' --insecure=false registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451 --registry-config=/tmp/registry-config3852044519' exited with non-zero exit code 1: \nerror: unable to read image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451: Get \"https://registry.ci.openshift.org/v2/\": dial tcp: lookup registry.ci.openshift.org on 192.168.111.1:53: read udp 192.168.111.80:51315->192.168.111.1:53: i/o timeout\n"
Nov 03 23:03:24 master-0 create-cluster-and-infraenv[2702]: time="2022-11-03T23:03:24Z" level=error msg="failed to get image openshift version from release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451" error="command 'oc adm release info -o template --template '\{{.metadata.version}}' --insecure=false registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451 --registry-config=/tmp/registry-config3852044519' exited with non-zero exit code 1: \nerror: unable to read image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451: Get \"https://registry.ci.openshift.org/v2/\": dial tcp: lookup registry.ci.openshift.org on 192.168.111.1:53: read udp 192.168.111.80:51315->192.168.111.1:53: i/o timeout\n"

This occurs when attempting to get the release here:
https://github.com/openshift/assisted-service/blob/master/cmd/agentbasedinstaller/register.go#L58

 

We should add a retry mechanism or restart the service to handle spurious network failures like this.

 

 

Description of problem:

When solving flakiness of a test in IO tests, we found that there are some issues in the cluster_version_matches condition for the conditional gatherer. 

Firstly the character limit should be increased as 32 characters does not cover every possible release version as some exceed that limit. 
Furthermore, there is an error in the schema

https://github.com/openshift/insights-operator/blob/master/pkg/gatherers/conditional/gathering_rule.schema.json#L101

There is no name, it should be version

How reproducible:

Sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Spin a cluster from a PR
2. If version exceeds 32 characters, we get in the pod logs: 'Could not get version from string: "<"'
 

Actual results:

'Could not get version from string: "<"'

Expected results:

Metadata should contain "Metadata should contain invalid range error"

Additional info:

However, since there's the possibility for versions to exceed 32 characters, we shouldn't expect an error in this situation. Therefore, there might be more than one issue.

Description of problem:

In ZTP input, we can put AdditionalNTPSources in order to have assisted-service mix the provided sources with those the nodes receive from DHCP.

AdditionalNTPSources in AgentConfig needs to be generated in InfraEnv in order for it to be applied in the installation

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11 MVP patch 2

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create AgentConfig with AdditionalNTPSources like for example "0.fedora.pool.ntp.org"
2. Generate ISO
3. Deploy
4. Check the resulting cluster nodes /etc/chrony.conf

Actual results:

chrony.conf only contains DHCP provided NTP sources (if not static network deplooyment)

Expected results:

/etc/chrony.conf in all the cluster nodes should have at least a server listed:
server 0.fedora.pool.ntp.org iburst

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2873. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Prometheus fails to scrape metrics from the storage operator after some time.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install storage operator.
2. Wait for 24h (time for the certificate to be recycled).
3.

Actual results:

Targets being down because Prometheus didn't reload the CA certificate.

Expected results:

Prometheus reloads its client TLS certificate and scrapes the target successfully.

Additional info:


This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3924. The following is the description of the original issue:

The APIs are scheduled for removal in Kube 1.26, which will ship with OpenShift 4.13. We want the 4.12 CVO to move to modern APIs in 4.12, so the APIRemovedInNext.*ReleaseInUse alerts are not firing on 4.12. We'll need the components setting manifests for these deprecated APIs to move to modern APIs. And then we should drop our ability to reconcile the deprecated APIs, to avoid having other components leak back in to using them.

Specifically cluster-monitoring-operator touches:

Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times

Full output of the test at https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/27560/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn/1593697975584952320/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn/openshift-e2e-test/build-log.txt:

[It] clients should not use APIs that are removed in upcoming releases [apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
  github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/apiserver/api_requests.go:27
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
Nov 18 21:59:06.261: INFO: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
[AfterEach] [sig-arch][Late]
  github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/client.go:158
[AfterEach] [sig-arch][Late]
  github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/client.go:159
flake: api flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 254 times
api horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 10 times
api prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io, removed in release 1.26, was accessed 22 times
user/system:admin accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 14 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 224 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-version:default accessed prioritylevelconfigurations.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 22 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator:kube-storage-version-migrator-sa accessed flowschemas.v1beta1.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io 16 times
user/system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:kube-state-metrics accessed horizontalpodautoscalers.v2beta2.autoscaling 10 times
Ginkgo exit error 4: exit with code 4

This is required to unblock https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27561

Not all of the errors reported by the assisted API (and shown in the wait-for bootstrap complete output) actually require user action.

Some appear when the agents first register but resolve themselves relatively quickly in the natural course of events.

Some, like the availability of NTP, don't block the installation from proceeding at all.

We need to think about the best ways of exposing this information to the user.

Grafana has been removed in 4.11 and we can safely remove any logic in CMO that deals with Grafana (except dashboards since they are used by OCP console).

Another point to clarify is to communicate to ProdSec and ART that Grafana isn't part of OCP anymore.

Description of problem:

For example, "openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.gcp.publicDNSZone" tells "PublicDNSZone contains the zone ID and project where the Public DNS zone will be created", but in fact it's for specifying an existing zone where the Public DNS zone records will be put in.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-10-015203

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.gcp.publicDNSZone
2. openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.gcp.privateDNSZone
3.

Actual results:

For example, it tells "PublicDNSZone contains the zone ID and project where the Public DNS zone will be created."

Expected results:

It should be like "PublicDNSZone contains the zone ID and project where the Public DNS zone records will be created."

Additional info:

$ openshift-install version
openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-10-015203
built from commit 02102a96b3f7c78337b32dcafe2e28be6fb67a0f
release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:00806cf7faaa86981e73b478a72c1b7a838cd08b215f3a9ab9b278ae94d9a794
release architecture amd64
$ 
$ openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.gcp.publicDNSZone
KIND:     InstallConfig
VERSION:  v1RESOURCE: <object>
  PublicDNSZone Technology Preview. PublicDNSZone contains the zone ID and project where the Public DNS zone will be created.FIELDS:
    id <string>
      ID Technology Preview. ID or name of the zone.
    project <string>   
      ProjectID Technology Preview When the ProjectID is provided, the zone will be created in this project. When the ProjectID is empty, the DNS zone with this ID will be created and managed in the Service Project (GCP.ProjectID).
$ 
$ openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.gcp.privateDNSZone
KIND:     InstallConfig
VERSION:  v1RESOURCE: <object>
  PrivateDNSZone Technology Preview. PrivateDNSZone contains the zone ID and project where the Private DNS zone will be created.FIELDS:
    id <string>
      ID Technology Preview. ID or name of the zone.
    project <string>
      ProjectID Technology Preview When the ProjectID is provided, the zone will be created in this project. When the ProjectID is empty, the DNS zone with this ID will be created and managed in the Service Project (GCP.ProjectID).
$ 

 

 

 

 

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2092811](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092811). The following is the description of the original bug:

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1926943 +++

The customer is facing this issue:

I0530 05:19:11.481797 1 vsphere_check.go:220] CheckDefaultDatastore failed: defaultDatastore "FI-HML-DC2-CONT-1" in vSphere configuration: datastore FI-HML-DC2-CONT-1: datastore name is too long: escaped volume path "var-lib-kubelet-plugins-kubernetes.io-vsphere\\x2dvolume-mounts\\x5bFI\\x2dHML\\x2dDC2\\x2dCONT\\x2d1\\x5d\\x2000000000\\x2d0000\\x2d0000\\x2d0000\\x2d000000000000-fi\\x2dhmy\\x2dsas\\x2dprod\\x2dnp868\\x2d\\x2dpvc\\x2d00000000\\x2d0000\\x2d0000\\x2d0000
x2d000000000000.vmdk" must be under 255 characters, got 255

Looks like the bug has resurfaced.

For the disconnected installation , we should not be able to provision machines successfully with publicIP:true , this has been the behavior earlier till -
4.11 and around 17th Aug nightly released 4.12 , but it has started allowing creation of machines with publicIP:true set in machineset

Issue reproduced on - Cluster version - 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-23-223922

It is always reproducible .

Steps :
Create machineset using yaml with 
{"spec":{"providerSpec":{"value":{"publicIP": true}}}}

Machineset created successfully and machine provisioned successfully .

This seems to be regression bug refer - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889620

Here is the must gather log - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UXjiqAx7obISTxkmBsSBuo44ciz9HD1F/view?usp=sharing

Here is the test successfully ran for 4.11 , for exactly same profile and machine creation failed with InvalidConfiguration Error- https://mastern-jenkins-csb-openshift-qe.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/ocp-common/job/Runner/575822/console

We can confirm disconnected cluster using below  there would be lot of mirrors used in those - 

oc get ImageContentSourcePolicy image-policy-aosqe -o yaml 

apiVersion: operator.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ImageContentSourcePolicy
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2022-08-24T09:08:47Z"
  generation: 1
  name: image-policy-aosqe
  resourceVersion: "34648"
  uid: 20e45d6d-e081-435d-b6bb-16c4ca21c9d6
spec:
  repositoryDigestMirrors:
  - mirrors:
    - miyadav-2408a.mirror-registry.qe.azure.devcluster.openshift.com:6001/olmqe
    source: quay.io/olmqe
  - mirrors:
    - miyadav-2408a.mirror-registry.qe.azure.devcluster.openshift.com:6001/openshifttest
    source: quay.io/openshifttest
  - mirrors:
    - miyadav-2408a.mirror-registry.qe.azure.devcluster.openshift.com:6001/openshift-qe-optional-operators
    source: quay.io/openshift-qe-optional-operators
  - mirrors:
    - miyadav-2408a.mirror-registry.qe.azure.devcluster.openshift.com:6002
    source: registry.redhat.io
  - mirrors:
    - miyadav-2408a.mirror-registry.qe.azure.devcluster.openshift.com:6002
    source: registry.stage.redhat.io
  - mirrors:
    - miyadav-2408a.mirror-registry.qe.azure.devcluster.openshift.com:6002
    source: brew.registry.redhat.io

 

 

When multi-cluster is enabled, it possible to get in a situation where you can't cancel login. If you select a cluster you don't know the credentials for, console will remember the last cluster and repeatedly send you to the login page with no way to cancel or go back. If we decide to set the last cluster in the user's preferences, it might be possible to get stuck even if you clear cookies and localStorage.

There are similar issues logging into cluster that are hibernating. See attached video.

cc Scott Berens

 A related slack thread: here

The error:

 which: no kustomize in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/local/go/bin:/go/bin)
+ curl -L --retry 5 https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/releases/download/kustomize%2Fv4.3.0/kustomize_v4.3.0_linux_amd64.tar.gz
+ tar -zx -C /usr/bin/
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed

  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
100  1523    0  1523    0     0  27196      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 26719
Warning: Problem : HTTP error. Will retry in 300 seconds. 5 retries left.

  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
gzip: stdin: not in gzip format
tar: Child died with signal 13
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now 

Source: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_assisted-service/4260/pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-release-ocm-2.6-e2e-ai-operator-ztp-disconnected/1561941429180174336

A related job search: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=gzip%3A+stdin%3A+not+in+gzip+format&maxAge=336h&context=1&type=junit&name=assisted&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4490. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When hypershift HostedCluster has endpointAccess: Private, the csi-snapshot-controller is in CrashLoopBackoff because the guest APIServer url in the admin-kubeconfig isn't reachable in Private mode.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

See https://github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/issues/1045

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

According to OCP 4.11 doc (https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/installing/installing_gcp/installing-gcp-account.html#installation-gcp-enabling-api-services_installing-gcp-account), the Service Usage API (serviceusage.googleapis.com) is an optional API service to be enabled. But, the installation cannot succeed if this API is disabled.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-25-071630

How reproducible:

Always, if the Service Usage API is disabled in the GCP project.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Make sure the Service Usage API (serviceusage.googleapis.com) is disabled in the GCP project.
2. Try IPI installation in the GCP project. 

Actual results:

The installation would fail finally, without any worker machines launched.

Expected results:

Installation should succeed, or the OCP doc should be updated.

Additional info:

Please see the attached must-gather logs (http://virt-openshift-05.lab.eng.nay.redhat.com/jiwei/jiwei-0926-03-cnxn5/) and the sanity check results. 
FYI if enabling the API, and without changing anything else, the installation could succeed. 

Description of problem:

The API Explorer page layout is incorrect,  please check the attachment for more details

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login OCP, Go to Home -> API Explorer page

2. Check if there is an extra blank line between the dropdown filter and the list 

Actual results:

There is an extra blank line between the dropdown filter and the list 

Expected results:

Use right patternfly package, remove the extra blank line

Additional info:

104.0.5112.79 (Official Build) (64-bit)

Description of problem:

Egress IP is not being assigned to primary interface of node as per hostsubnet definition. The issue being observed at an Openshift cluster hosted on Disconnected AWS environment.  Following steps were performed at AWS end:

- Disconnected VPC was created and installation of Openshift was done as per documentation.
- Elastic IP could not be used as it is a disconnected environment. Customer identified a free IP from same subnet as the node and modified interface of the node to add a secondary IP.

It seems cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig annotation is need on the node to attach IP to primary interface but its missing. From SDN POD log on the same node I  could see its complaining about 'an incomplete annotation "cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig"'. Will share more details over comments.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift 4.10.28

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a disconnected environment on AWS
2. find a free IP from subnet where a worker node is hosted and add that as secondary  IP to NIC of that node.
3. Configure hostsubnet and netnamespace on Openshift cluster

Actual results:

- Eress IP is not being attached to primary interface of node for which hostsubnet has been configured

Expected results:

- Egress IP should get configured without any issue.

Additional info:


Description of problem:

Currently when installing Openshift on the Openstack cluster name length limit is allowed to  14 characters.
Customer wants to know if is it possible to override this validation when installing Openshift on Openstack and create a cluster name that is greater than 14 characters.

Version : OCP 4.8.5 UPI Disconnected 
Environment : Openstack 16 

Issue:
User reports that they are getting error for OCP cluster in Openstack UPI, where the name of the cluster is > 14 characters.

Error events :
~~~
fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"changed": true, "cmd": ["/usr/local/bin/openshift-install", "create", "manifests", "--dir=/home/gitlab-runner/builds/WK8mkokN/0/CPE/SKS/pipelines/non-prod/ocp4-openstack-build/ocpinstaller/install-upi"], "delta": "0:00:00.311397", "end": "2022-09-03 21:38:41.974608", "msg": "non-zero return code", "rc": 1, "start": "2022-09-03 21:38:41.663211", "stderr": "level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Master Machines: failed to load asset \"Install Config\": invalid \"install-config.yaml\" file: metadata.name: Invalid value: \"sks-osp-inf-cpe-1-cbr1a\": cluster name is too long, please restrict it to 14 characters", "stderr_lines": ["level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Master Machines: failed to load asset \"Install Config\": invalid \"install-config.yaml\" file: metadata.name: Invalid value: \"sks-osp-inf-cpe-1-cbr1a\": cluster name is too long, please restrict it to 14 characters"], "stdout": "", "stdout_lines": []}
~~~

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

 

Actual results:

Users are getting error "cluster name is too long" when clustername contains more than 14 characters for OCP on Openstack

Expected results:

The 14 characters limit should be change for the OCP clustername on Openstack

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

openshift-install does not detect releaseImage mismatches between cluster-image-set.yaml and registries.conf

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create ZTP inputs for image generation where registries.conf does not have any source matching the binary releaseimage (the binary image which can be obtained by running "openshift-install version". You can also set this value in ZTP manifest cluster-image-set.yaml 
2.run openshift-install agent create image

Actual results:

Image is generated with no warnings

Expected results:

Image is generated with warning message - "The ImageContentSources configuration in install-config.yaml should have at-least one source field matching the releaseImage value %s", releaseImagePath

 

Additional info:

 

 

CI is failing due to the updated pod security admission controller. We need to update the console test pods with the correct security values.

Error: Command failed: echo '{"apiVersion":"v1","kind":"Pod","metadata":

{"name":"test-jxlpt-event-test-pod","namespace":"test-jxlpt"}

,"spec":{"containers":[

{"name":"httpd","image":"image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/openshift/httpd:latest"}

]}}' | kubectl create -n test-jxlpt -f -
Error from server (Forbidden): error when creating "STDIN": pods "test-jxlpt-event-test-pod" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:v1.24": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (container "httpd" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unrestricted capabilities (container "httpd" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=["ALL"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or container "httpd" must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot=true), seccompProfile (pod or container "httpd" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to "RuntimeDefault" or "Localhost")

Description of problem:

failed to run command in pod with network-tools script pod-run-netns-command locally

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Client Version: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-07-25-055755
Kustomize Version: v4.5.4
Server Version: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419
Kubernetes Version: v1.24.0+8c7c967

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.configure KUBECONFIG
[cloud-user@preserved-qiowang debug-scripts]$ export | grep kube
declare -x KUBECONFIG="/var/tmp/kubeconfig412"
[cloud-user@preserved-qiowang debug-scripts]$ oc get nodes
NAME                                                         STATUS   ROLES                  AGE     VERSION
qiowang-09291-chllb-master-0.c.openshift-qe.internal         Ready    control-plane,master   7h16m   v1.24.0+8c7c967
qiowang-09291-chllb-master-1.c.openshift-qe.internal         Ready    control-plane,master   7h16m   v1.24.0+8c7c967
qiowang-09291-chllb-master-2.c.openshift-qe.internal         Ready    control-plane,master   7h16m   v1.24.0+8c7c967
qiowang-09291-chllb-worker-a-2zq28.c.openshift-qe.internal   Ready    worker                 6h59m   v1.24.0+8c7c967
qiowang-09291-chllb-worker-b-226ft.c.openshift-qe.internal   Ready    worker                 6h59m   v1.24.0+8c7c967
qiowang-09291-chllb-worker-c-wq52c.c.openshift-qe.internal   Ready    worker                 6h59m   v1.24.0+8c7c967

2. clone the openshift/network-tools repo to local

3. create project test, create pod hello-world
[cloud-user@preserved-qiowang debug-scripts]$ oc project
Using project "test" on server "https://api.qiowang-09291.qe.gcp.devcluster.openshift.com:6443".
[cloud-user@preserved-qiowang debug-scripts]$ oc get pods
NAME                READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
hello-world-j9v9g   1/1     Running   0          68s
hello-world-rrwjf   1/1     Running   0          68s

4. run ping command in the pod hello-world-j9v9g with script pod-run-netns-command locally
[cloud-user@preserved-qiowang debug-scripts]$ ./network-tools pod-run-netns-command test hello-world-j9v9g ping 8.8.8.8 -c 5
ERROR: Command returned non-zero exit code, check output or logs.

Actual results:

failed to run command in pod hello-world-j9v9g with script pod-run-netns-command locally

Expected results:

can run ping 8.8.8.8 -c 5 in pod hello-world-j9v9g with script pod-run-netns-command locally

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

This a bug record to pin down dependencies version in CMO release 4.12 after the release-4.12 branch was detached from master branch.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

N/A

Steps to Reproduce:

N/A

Actual results:

N/A

Expected results:

N/A

Additional info:

None.

job=pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-builds=all

This test has started permafailing on e2e-gcp-builds:

[sig-builds][Feature:Builds][Slow] s2i build with environment file in sources Building from a template should create a image from "test-env-build.json" template and run it in a pod [apigroup:build.openshift.io][apigroup:image.openshift.io]

The error in the test says

Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:21 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulling: Pulling image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8"
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulled: Successfully pulled image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8" in 1.763914719s
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Created: Created container test
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Started: Started container test
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:24 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulled: Container image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8" already present on machine
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:25 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Unhealthy: Readiness probe failed: Get "http://10.129.2.63:8080/": dial tcp 10.129.2.63:8080: connect: connection refused
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:26 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} BackOff: Back-off restarting failed container

Description of problem:

When a user tries to run `oc debug,` they end up getting errors about pod security labels:

 Ensure the target namespace has the appropriate security level set or consider creating a dedicated privileged namespace using:
	"oc create ns <namespace> -o yaml | oc label -f - security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=false pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=privileged pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=privileged pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=privileged".
Original error:
pods "ip-10-0-129-209ec2internal-debug" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:latest": host namespaces (hostNetwork=true, hostPID=true, hostIPC=true), privileged (container "container-00" must not set securityContext.privileged=true), allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (container "container-00" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unrestricted capabilities (container "container-00" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=["ALL"]), restricted volume types (volume "host" uses restricted volume type "hostPath"), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or container "container-00" must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot=true), runAsUser=0 (container "container-00" must not set runAsUser=0), seccompProfile (pod or container "container-00" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to "RuntimeDefault" or "Localhost")
command failed, 3 retries left

This happens since https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/authentication/understanding-and-managing-pod-security-admission.html

Fixing it requires the user running something like

oc create ns fips-check -o yaml | \
  oc label -f - \
  security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=false \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=privileged \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=privileged \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=privileged
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Try to run `oc debug node/....` in a new namespace

Actual results:

Error message

Expected results:

oc debug works without the user having to perform additional steps. If namespace is omitted, perhaps oc debug could create a temporary one with the correct pod security labels?

Additional info:

Description of problem:
When the user selects Serverless as an import strategy and tried to import a Devfile, the import fails because of an invalid Deployment.

Could reproduce this already in 4.11, but its even more prominent in 4.12 when the console automatically selects the resource type serverless when the Serverless operator is installed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Works on 4.10
Failed on 4.11 and 4.12 master

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install and setup Serverless operator
1. Switch to dev perspective, navigate to add > import from git
3. Enter a non-Devfile git URL like https://github.com/jerolimov/nodeinfo
4. On 4.11 select resource type Serverless (on 4.12 this should be selected automatically)
5. Update the git URL to a repo with a Devfile like https://github.com/nodeshift-starters/devfile-sample
6. Press create

Actual results:
Import fails with error:

Error "Invalid value: "": name part must be non-empty" for field "spec.template.labels".

Expected results:
Devfile should be imported

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1327. The following is the description of the original issue:

See this comment for some updated information

Description of problem:
During IPI installation on IBM Cloud (x86_64), some of the worker machines have been seen to have no network connectivity during their initial bootup. Investigations were performed with IBM Cloud VPC to attempt to identify the issue, but in all appearances, all virtualization appears to be working.

Unfortunately due to this issue, no network traffic, no access to these worker machines is available to help identify the issue (Ignition is stuck without network traffic), so no SSH or console login is available to collect logs, or perform any testing on these machines.

The only content available is the console output, showing ignition is stuck due to the network issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12.0

How reproducible:
About 60%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create an IPI cluster on IBM Cloud
2. Wait for the worker machines to be provisioned, causing IPI to fail waiting on machine-api operator
3. Check console of worker machines failing to report in to cluster (in this case 2 of 3 failed)

Actual results:
IPI creation failed waiting on machine-api operator to complete all worker node deployment

Expected results:
Successful IPI creation on IBM Cloud

Additional info:
As stated, investigation was performed by IBM Cloud VPC, but no further investigation could be performed since no access to these worker machines is available. Any further details that could be provided to help identify the issue would be helpful.

This appears to have become more prominent recently as well, causing concern for IBM Cloud's IPI GA support on the 4.12 release.

The only solution to restore network connectivity is rebooting the machine, which loses ignition bring up (I assume it must be triggered manually now), and in the case of IPI, isn't a great mitigation.

Description of problem:

Since openenshift/cluster-ingress-operator#817 merged, the e2e-aws-operator CI job has been failing for multiple PRs in the cluster-ingress-operator repository.  In particular, the TestScopeChange test has been consistently failing. Example failures:

The operator is repeatedly logging errors like the following in those failing CI jobs:

ERROR    operator.dns_controller    controller/controller.go:121    failed to delete dnsrecord; will retry    \{"dnsrecord": {"metadata":{"name":"scope-wildcard","namespace":"openshift-ingress-operator","uid":"2cb9936f-d6a0-4377-b3ed-c5167c5e9e4d","resourceVersion":"42217","generation":2,"creationTimestamp":"2022-10-13T16:19:23Z","deletionTimestamp":"2022-10-13T16:20:27Z","deletionGracePeriodSeconds":0,"labels":{"ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io/owning-ingresscontroller":"scope"},"ownerReferences":[\{"apiVersion":"operator.openshift.io/v1","kind":"IngressController","name":"scope","uid":"713ac1c5-451b-42d1-89fd-c3910eb80fe3","controller":true,"blockOwnerDeletion":true}],"finalizers":["operator.openshift.io/ingress-dns"],"managedFields":[\{"manager":"ingress-operator","operation":"Update","apiVersion":"ingress.operator.openshift.io/v1","time":"2022-10-13T16:19:23Z","fieldsType":"FieldsV1","fieldsV1":{"f:metadata":{"f:finalizers":{".":{},"v:\"operator.openshift.io/ingress-dns\"":{}},"f:labels":\{".":{},"f:ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io/owning-ingresscontroller":{}},"f:ownerReferences":\{".":{},"k:\{\"uid\":\"713ac1c5-451b-42d1-89fd-c3910eb80fe3\"}":{}}},"f:spec":\{".":{},"f:dnsManagementPolicy":{},"f:dnsName":{},"f:recordTTL":{},"f:recordType":{},"f:targets":{}}}},\{"manager":"ingress-operator","operation":"Update","apiVersion":"ingress.operator.openshift.io/v1","time":"2022-10-13T16:19:24Z","fieldsType":"FieldsV1","fieldsV1":{"f:status":{".":{},"f:observedGeneration":{},"f:zones":{}}},"subresource":"status"}]},"spec":\{"dnsName":"*.scope.ci-op-x1j7dsgt-43abb.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com.","targets":["af6e309caa14c41eabe69f3f9eb15cf1-1656133782.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com"],"recordType":"CNAME","recordTTL":30,"dnsManagementPolicy":"Managed"},"status":\{"zones":[{"dnsZone":{"tags":{"Name":"ci-op-x1j7dsgt-43abb-45zhd-int","kubernetes.io/cluster/ci-op-x1j7dsgt-43abb-45zhd":"owned"}},"conditions":[\{"type":"Published","status":"True","lastTransitionTime":"2022-10-13T16:19:23Z","reason":"ProviderSuccess","message":"The DNS provider succeeded in ensuring the record"}]},\{"dnsZone":{"id":"Z2GYOLTZHS5VK"},"conditions":[\{"type":"Published","status":"True","lastTransitionTime":"2022-10-13T16:19:24Z","reason":"ProviderSuccess","message":"The DNS provider succeeded in ensuring the record"}]}],"observedGeneration":1}}, "error": "failed to get hosted zone for load balancer target \"af6e309caa14c41eabe69f3f9eb15cf1-1656133782.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com\": couldn't find hosted zone ID of ELB af6e309caa14c41eabe69f3f9eb15cf1-1656133782.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com", "errorCauses": [\{"error": "failed to get hosted zone for load balancer target \"af6e309caa14c41eabe69f3f9eb15cf1-1656133782.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com\": couldn't find hosted zone ID of ELB af6e309caa14c41eabe69f3f9eb15cf1-1656133782.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com"}, \{"error": "failed to get hosted zone for load balancer target \"af6e309caa14c41eabe69f3f9eb15cf1-1656133782.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com\": couldn't find hosted zone ID of ELB af6e309caa14c41eabe69f3f9eb15cf1-1656133782.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com"}]}}}

The scope-wildcard dnsrecord is created for the TestScopeChange test.

Using search.ci, it seems that the failures occurred many times on #817 before it merged and then started occurring for the other PRs after #817 merged.

I filed a PR, openshift/cluster-ingress-operator#838, that reverts #817. I have run the e2e-aws-operator CI job on this PR twice. While the job has failed both times, the TestScopeChange test did not fail either time.

At this point, we have strong evidence that #817 is causing TestScopeChange to fail.

Grant Spence did some testing and determined that there is some interaction between TestAllowedSourceRangesStatus and TestScopeChange. It may suffice to serialize some tests (TestScopeChanged is currently a parallel test, as is TestAllowedSourceRangesStatus and two other tests that #817 adds).

If the problem cannot be resolved by serializing tests, it may be necessary to revert #817 to unblock CI.

Note that this issue is blocking NE-942, NE-1072, and NE-682, as well as any bugfix PRs for the master branch in openshift/cluster-ingress-operator.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Consistently.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Run CI on a PR against the master branch of cluster-ingress-operator.

Actual results:

The TestScopeChange test fails as described.

Expected results:

TestScopeChange should not fail.

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-860. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

In GCP, once an external IP address is assigned to master/infra node through GCP console, numbers of pending CSR from kubernetes.io/kubelet-serving is increasing, and the following error are reported:

I0902 10:48:29.254427       1 controller.go:121] Reconciling CSR: csr-q7bwd
I0902 10:48:29.365774       1 csr_check.go:157] csr-q7bwd: CSR does not appear to be client csr
I0902 10:48:29.371827       1 csr_check.go:545] retrieving serving cert from build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal (10.0.0.5:10250)
I0902 10:48:29.375052       1 csr_check.go:188] Found existing serving cert for build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal
I0902 10:48:29.375152       1 csr_check.go:192] Could not use current serving cert for renewal: CSR Subject Alternate Name values do not match current certificate
I0902 10:48:29.375166       1 csr_check.go:193] Current SAN Values: [build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal 10.0.0.5], CSR SAN Values: [build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal 10.0.0.5 35.211.234.95]
I0902 10:48:29.375175       1 csr_check.go:202] Falling back to machine-api authorization for build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal
E0902 10:48:29.375184       1 csr_check.go:420] csr-q7bwd: IP address '35.211.234.95' not in machine addresses: 10.0.0.5
I0902 10:48:29.375193       1 csr_check.go:205] Could not use Machine for serving cert authorization: IP address '35.211.234.95' not in machine addresses: 10.0.0.5
I0902 10:48:29.379457       1 csr_check.go:218] Falling back to serving cert renewal with Egress IP checks
I0902 10:48:29.382668       1 csr_check.go:221] Could not use current serving cert and egress IPs for renewal: CSR Subject Alternate Names includes unknown IP addresses
I0902 10:48:29.382702       1 controller.go:233] csr-q7bwd: CSR not authorized

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.2

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Assign external IPs to master/infra node in GCP
2. oc get csr | grep kubernetes.io/kubelet-serving

Actual results:

CSRs are not approved

Expected results:

CSRs are approved

Additional info:

This issue is only happen in GCP. Same OpenShift installations in AWS do not have this issue.

It looks like the CSR are created using external IP addresses once assigned.

Ref: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C03KEQZC1L2/p1662122007083059

These two tests are permafailing on webhook errors related to the CRD:

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should show the Provisioning Network as 'Disabled' [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should [apigroup:config.openshift.io] show the Provisioning Network as 'Disabled' [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should allow setting the ProvisioningNetwork to 'Managed' with valid settings [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should [apigroup:config.openshift.io] allow setting the ProvisioningNetwork to 'Managed' with valid settings [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-virtualmedia=all

Example run:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-virtualmedia/1567416810377056256

Sippy links:

https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=%5Bsig-installer%5D%5BFeature%3Abaremetal%5D%5BSerial%5D%20A%20baremetal%20deployment%20without%20a%20provisioning%20network%20should%20allow%20setting%20the%20ProvisioningNetwork%20to%20%27Managed%27%20with%20valid%20settings%20%5BSuite%3Aopenshift%2Fconformance%2Fserial%5D

https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=%5Bsig-installer%5D%5BFeature%3Abaremetal%5D%5BSerial%5D%20A%20baremetal%20deployment%20without%20a%20provisioning%20network%20should%20show%20the%20Provisioning%20Network%20as%20%27Disabled%27%20%5BSuite%3Aopenshift%2Fconformance%2Fserial%5D

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3990. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

This PR fails HyperShift CI fails with:

=== RUN TestAutoscaling/EnsureNoPodsWithTooHighPriority
util.go:411: pod csi-snapshot-controller-7bb4b877b4-q5457 with priorityClassName system-cluster-critical has a priority of 2000000000 with exceeds the max allowed of 100002000
util.go:411: pod csi-snapshot-webhook-644b6dbfb-v4lj7 with priorityClassName system-cluster-critical has a priority of 2000000000 with exceeds the max allowed of 100002000

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install HyperShift + create a guest cluster with CSI Snapshot Controller and/or Cluster Storage Operator / AWS EBS CSI driver operator running in the HyperShift managed cluster
  2. Check priorityClass of the guest control plane pods in the hosted cluster.

Alternatively, ci/prow/e2e-aws in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1698 and https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1748 must pass.

Description of problem:

OVN-Kubernetes master is crashing during upgrade from 4.11.5 to 4.11.6

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.5 to 4.11.6
cannot clean up egress default deny ACL name: cannot update old NetworkPolicy ACLs for namespace ocm-myuser-1urk47c6ti1n94n1spdvo9902as3klar-sd6: error in transact with ops [{Op:update Table:ACL Row:map[action:drop direction:from-lport external_ids:{GoMap:map[default-deny-policy-type:Egress]} log:false match:inport == @a12995145443578534523_egressDefaultDeny meter:{GoSet:[acl-logging]} name:{GoSet:[ocm-myuser-1urk47c6ti1n94n1spdvo9902as3klar-sd6_egressDefaultDeny]} options:{GoMap:map[apply-after-lb:true]} priority:1000 severity:{GoSet:[info]}] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {5277db54-dd96-4c4d-bbed-99142cab91e7}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}] results [{Count:0 Error:constraint violation Details:"ocm-myuser-1urk47c6ti1n94n1spdvo9902as3klar-sd6_egressDefaultDeny" length 65 is greater than maximum allowed length 63 UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]}] and errors 


Our CMO e2e tests create several containers besides the standard CMO deployment. These pods do currently not set any security context capabilities. Currently this creates a warning like so:

W0705 08:35:38.590283 15206 warnings.go:70] would violate PodSecurity "restricted:v1.24": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (container "alertmanager-webhook-e2e-testutil" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unrestricted capabilities (container "alertmanager-webhook-e2e-testutil" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=["ALL"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or container "alertmanager-webhook-e2e-testutil" must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot=true), seccompProfile (pod or container "alertmanager-webhook-e2e-testutil" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to "RuntimeDefault" or "Localhost")

We should be proactive and set security capability contraints. From this run this seems to impact the following pods/containers:

  • alertmanager-webhook-e2e-testutil
  • prometheus-example-app

Both are used more then once.

Relevant docs: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html#security-context-constraints-about_configuring-internal-oauth

Description of problem:

When alert raised for vSphere privilege check which is reported by vsphere-problem-detector, we could only get the very simple info as below:

 

=======================================

Description

The vsphere-problem-detector monitors the health and configuration of OpenShift on VSphere. If problems are found which may prevent machine scaling, storage provisioning, and safe upgrades, the vsphere-problem-detector will raise alerts.

 

Summary

VSphere cluster health checks are failing

 

Message

VSphere cluster health checks are failing with CheckAccountPermissions

=======================================

 

  1. Please add vSphere privilege check in the Description, currently only mention "prevent machine scaling, storage provisioning, and safe upgrades" 
  2. Could we at least add something like "Check vsphere-problem-detector pod log in openshift-cluster-storage-operator namespace to see the detail info" if we could not list which privilege is missing.

(We could get the namespace/pod info from metric, but I think adding it in alert Description or Message should be more clear)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-12-152748

 

How reproducible:

Always

 

Steps to Reproduce:

See description

Actual results:

Alert info is not so clear

 

Expected results:

Add more Alert info

Description of problem:

Installation fails on AWS because the installer manifests include an invalid ingresses.config.openshift.io/cluster manifest.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.

How reproducible:

Seems to be a consistent failure.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a cluster on AWS without specifying lbType in the install-config.

Actual results:

The cluster bootstrap fails with the following error message:

"cluster-ingress-02-config.yml": failed to create ingresses.v1.config.openshift.io/cluster -n : Ingress.config.openshift.io "cluster" is invalid: spec.loadBalancer.platform.aws.type: Required value
 

Expected results:

Cluster bootstrap should succeed.

Additional info:

https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6478 introduced the problematic logic that sets spec.loadBalancer.platform.aws without setting spec.loadBalancer.platform.aws.type.

 

Description of problem:

This bug is a copy of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137616 as fix needs to go on OCP side.
For must gather and attached screenshots please refer the bugzilla.
Add Capacity button does not exist after upgrade OCP version [OCP4.11->OCP4.12]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

ODF Version:4.11.3-3
OCP Version: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-24-103753
Provider: AWS

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Install ODF4.11 +OCP4.11
2.Upgrade OCP4.11 to OCP4.12
3.Log in to the OpenShift Web Console.
4.Click Operators → Installed Operators.
5.Click OpenShift Data Foundation Operator.
6.Click the Storage Systems tab.
7.Click the Action Menu (⋮) on the far right of the storage system name to extend the options menu.
"Add Capacity" button does not exist on menu.
*Attached Screenshot 

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem: As discovered in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2795, gophercloud fails to list swift containers when the endpoint speaks HTTP2. This means that CIRO will provision a 100GB cinder volume even though swift is available to the tenant.

We're for example seeing this behavior in our CI on vexxhost.

The gophercloud commit that fixed this issue is https://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/commit/b7d5b2cdd7ffc13e79d924f61571b0e5f74ec91c, specifically the `|| ct == ""` part on line 75 of openstack/objectstorage/v1/containers/results.go. This commit made it in gophercloud v0.18.0.

CIRO still depends on gophercloud v0.17.0. We should bump gophercloud to fix the bug.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

All versions. Fix should go to 4.8 - 4.12.

How reproducible:

Always, when swift speaks HTTP2.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


And possibly other alerts.  Declaring namespace labels on alerts makes it easy to find the source or affected resource, as described here. But because Insights alerts are based on metrics exported by the cluster-version operator, they inherit source information from the CVO, and end up looking like:

ALERTS{alertname="SimpleContentAccessNotAvailable", alertstate="firing", condition="SCAAvailable", endpoint="metrics", instance="10.58.57.116:9099", job="cluster-version-operator", name="insights", namespace="openshift-cluster-version", pod="cluster-version-operator-5d8579fb58-p5hfn", prometheus="openshift-monitoring/k8s", reason="NotFound", receive="true", service="cluster-version-operator", severity="info"}

Adding namespace: openshift-insights to the labels block for InsightsDisabled and SimpleContentAccessNotAvailable would avoid this confusion.

You might also want to clear the job and service labels as irrelevant source information. And you might want to clear the pod label to avoid churning alerts when the CVO rolls out a new pod. You can get the label clearing by wrapping the expr with max without (job, pod, service) (...) or similar.

Description of problem:

AWS tagging - when applying user defined tags you cannot add more than 10

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Configure userTags for aws platform with more than 8 tags.
2. Installer fails to add the tags while AWS supports upto 50 tags.

Actual results:

Installer validation fails.

Expected results:

Installer should be able to add more than 8 tags.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

If a master fails and is drained, the old copy of the metal3 pod gets stuck in Terminating state for some (possibly long) time. While the new pod works correctly, CBO expects only one port to exist and thus cannot determine the applicable Ironic IP address.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. On dev-scripts: virsh destroy <VM with metal3 pod>
2. Wait for drain to happen or trigger it manually
3. Check CBO logs

Actual results:

"unable to determine Ironic's IP to pass to the machine-image-customization-controller: there should be only one pod listed for the given label"

Expected results:

CBO reconfigures its pods with the new Ironic IP

Additional info:

I don't know how to filter out pods in Terminating state...

Searching recent 4.12 CI, there are a number of failures in the clusteroperator/machine-config should not change condition/Available test case:

$ w3m -dump -cols 200 'https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=clusteroperator%2Fmachine-config+should+not+change+condition%2FAvailable&maxAge=48h&type=junit' | grep '4[.]12.*failures match' | sort
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade (all) - 129 runs, 53% failed, 6% of failures match = 3% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-sdn-techpreview-serial (all) - 6 runs, 50% failed, 67% of failures match = 33% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade (all) - 60 runs, 50% failed, 3% of failures match = 2% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade (all) - 129 runs, 56% failed, 8% of failures match = 5% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade (all) - 129 runs, 69% failed, 12% of failures match = 9% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade (all) - 8 runs, 38% failed, 67% of failures match = 25% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade (all) - 60 runs, 57% failed, 6% of failures match = 3% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade (all) - 12 runs, 42% failed, 20% of failures match = 8% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-aws-sdn-upgrade (all) - 60 runs, 40% failed, 4% of failures match = 2% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-virtualmedia (all) - 6 runs, 100% failed, 17% of failures match = 17% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-upgrade (all) - 6 runs, 67% failed, 25% of failures match = 17% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-dualstack (all) - 6 runs, 67% failed, 25% of failures match = 17% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial (all) - 9 runs, 56% failed, 20% of failures match = 11% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade (all) - 6 runs, 100% failed, 17% of failures match = 17% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade-ovn-ipv6 (all) - 6 runs, 83% failed, 20% of failures match = 17% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-okd-4.12-e2e-vsphere (all) - 25 runs, 100% failed, 4% of failures match = 4% impact
release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-gcp-serial-4.12 (all) - 6 runs, 83% failed, 20% of failures match = 17% impact

Doesn't seem like reason is getting set?

$ curl -s 'https://search.ci.openshift.org/search?name=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade&search=clusteroperator%2Fmachine-config+should+not+change+condition%2FAvailable&maxAge=48h&type=junit&context=15' | jq -r 'to_entries[].value | to_entries[].value[].context[]' | grep 'clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason'
Aug 31 01:13:56.724 - 698s  E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason/Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-30-194744}]
Aug 31 09:09:15.460 - 1078s E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason/Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-30-194744}]
Sep 01 03:31:24.808 - 1131s E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason/Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}]
Sep 01 07:15:58.029 - 1085s E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason/Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}]

Example runs in the job I've randomly selected to drill into:

$ curl -s 'https://search.ci.openshift.org/search?name=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade&search=clusteroperator%2Fmachine-config+should+not+change+condition%2FAvailable&maxAge=48h&type=junit' | jq -r 'keys[]'
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1564757706458271744
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1564879945233076224
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1565158084484009984
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1565212566194491392

Drilling into that last run, the Available=False was the whole pool-update phase:

And details from the origin's monitor:

$ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1565212566194491392/artifacts/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/build-log.txt | grep clusteroperator/machine-config
Sep 01 07:15:57.629 E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Degraded status/True reason/RenderConfigFailed changed: Failed to resync 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359 because: refusing to read osImageURL version "4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740", operator version "4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359"
Sep 01 07:15:57.629 - 49s   E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Degraded status/True reason/Failed to resync 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359 because: refusing to read osImageURL version "4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740", operator version "4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359"
Sep 01 07:15:58.029 E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False changed: Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}]
Sep 01 07:15:58.029 - 1085s E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason/Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}]
Sep 01 07:16:47.000 I /machine-config reason/OperatorVersionChanged clusteroperator/machine-config-operator started a version change from [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}] to [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740}]
Sep 01 07:16:47.377 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Progressing status/True changed: Working towards 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740
Sep 01 07:16:47.377 - 1037s W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Progressing status/True reason/Working towards 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740
Sep 01 07:16:47.405 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Degraded status/False changed: 
Sep 01 07:18:02.614 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Upgradeable status/False reason/PoolUpdating changed: One or more machine config pools are updating, please see `oc get mcp` for further details
Sep 01 07:34:03.000 I /machine-config reason/OperatorVersionChanged clusteroperator/machine-config-operator version changed from [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}] to [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740}]
Sep 01 07:34:03.699 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/True changed: Cluster has deployed [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}]
Sep 01 07:34:03.715 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Upgradeable status/True changed: 
Sep 01 07:34:04.065 I clusteroperator/machine-config versions: operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359 -> 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740
Sep 01 07:34:04.663 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Progressing status/False changed: Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740
[bz-Machine Config Operator] clusteroperator/machine-config should not change condition/Available
[bz-Machine Config Operator] clusteroperator/machine-config should not change condition/Degraded

No idea if whatever was happening there is the same thing that was happening in other runs, and I haven't checked 4.11 and earlier either. The test-case is non-fatal, so it doesn't break CI, but it can cause noise like ClusterOperatorDown if it continues for 10 or more minutes. Whic PromeCIeus says actually fired in this run, although apparently the origin monitors didn't notice to complain:

So parallel asks (and I'm happy to shard into separate bugs, if that's helpful):

  • Set a reason when you go Available=False, so Telemetry can collect information to aggregate and hunt for frequent reasons to prioritize improvements.
  • Figure out at least one reason why we're going Available=False in apparently healthy CI runs. If we find and fix one reason, we can circle back later to see if there are more that remain unfixed.

Description of problem:

When providing install-config as

platform:
 baremetal:
  apiVIP: 192.168.122.10
  ingressVIP: 192.168.122.11

agent installer fails with 
bin/openshift-install agent create cluster-manifests
FATAL failed to fetch Agent Manifests: failed to load asset "Install Config": invalid install-config configuration: [Platform.Baremetal.ApiVips: Required value: apiVips must be set for baremetal platform, Platform.Baremetal.IngressVips: Required value: ingressVips must be set for baremetal platform]
 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Git clone latest installer https://github.com/openshift/installer and build it
2. Provide install-config.yaml for baremetal platform with deprecated apiVip and ingressVip set
3. Create agent image with "bin/openshift-install agent create cluster-manifests"

Actual results:

bin/openshift-install agent create cluster-manifests
FATAL failed to fetch Agent Manifests: failed to load asset "Install Config": invalid install-config configuration: [Platform.Baremetal.ApiVips: Required value: apiVips must be set for baremetal platform, Platform.Baremetal.IngressVips: Required value: ingressVips must be set for baremetal platform]

Expected results:

agent installer should upconvert the depreacted fields and should not error. apiVip, ingressVip should be upconverted into apiVips and ingressVips respectively

Additional info:

 

Our Prometheus alerts are inconsistent with both upstream and sometimes our own vendor folder. Let's do a clean update run before the next release is branched off.

In the Known Issues section of the OpenStack-specific Installer docs issues, there is a point about control plane anti-affinity.

The known issue has several problems:

  • it is in the UPI section, when it is not a UPI-specific issue
  • it mentions Control plane scale-out, when OCP only supports exactly 3 masters
  • it is now possible to set anti-affinity from the install-config.yaml, and that should be the recommended solution when VM distribution across hosts is required.

Description of problem:

Disconnected IPI OCP 4.11.5 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"    

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.11.5

How reproducible:  Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.11.5 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"

Steps to Reproduce:

Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.11.5 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"

Actual results: master nodes do come up.

Expected results: master nodes should come up despite that the text "master" is not in their hostname.

Additional info:

Disconnected IPI OCP 4.11.5 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"    

My cust reinstall new cluster using the fix here . But they have the exact same issue. The metal3 pod have  PROVISIONING_MACS value  empty.  Can we work together with them to understand why the new code fix https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/commit/76bd6bc461b30a6a450f85a42e492a0933178aee is not working.

cat metal3-static-ip-set/metal3-static-ip-set/logs/current.log
2022-09-27T14:19:38.140662564Z + '[' -z 10.17.199.3/27 ']'
2022-09-27T14:19:38.140662564Z + '[' -z '' ']'
2022-09-27T14:19:38.140662564Z + '[' -n '' ']'
2022-09-27T14:19:38.140722345Z ERROR: Could not find suitable interface for "10.17.199.3/27"
2022-09-27T14:19:38.140726312Z + '[' -n '' ']'
2022-09-27T14:19:38.140726312Z + echo 'ERROR: Could not find suitable interface for "10.17.199.3/27"'
2022-09-27T14:19:38.140726312Z + exit 1

 

cat metal3-b9bf8d595-gv94k.yaml
...
initContainers:

command: /set-static-ip
env: name: PROVISIONING_IP
value: 10.17.199.3/27 name: PROVISIONING_INTERFACE name: PROVISIONING_MACS <------------------------- missing MACS
image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:4f04793bd109ecba2dfe43be93dc990ac5299272482c150bd5f2eee0f80c983b
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
name: metal3-static-ip-set
.... 
  • omc logs machine-api-controllers-6b9ffd96cd-grh6l -c nodelink-controller  -n openshift-machine-api
    2022-09-21T16:13:43.600517485Z I0921 16:13:43.600513       1 nodelink_controller.go:408] Finding machine from node "blocp-1-106-m-0.c106-1.sc.evolhse.hydro.qc.ca"
    2022-09-21T16:13:43.600521381Z I0921 16:13:43.600517       1 nodelink_controller.go:425] Finding machine from node "blocp-1-106-m-0.c106-1.sc.evolhse.hydro.qc.ca" by ProviderID
    2022-09-21T16:13:43.600525225Z W0921 16:13:43.600521       1 nodelink_controller.go:427] Node "blocp-1-106-m-0.c106-1.sc.evolhse.hydro.qc.ca" has no providerID
    2022-09-21T16:13:43.600528917Z I0921 16:13:43.600524       1 nodelink_controller.go:448] Finding machine from node "blocp-1-106-m-0.c106-1.sc.evolhse.hydro.qc.ca" by IP
    2022-09-21T16:13:43.600532711Z I0921 16:13:43.600529       1 nodelink_controller.go:453] Found internal IP for node "blocp-1-106-m-0.c106-1.sc.evolhse.hydro.qc.ca": "10.17.192.33"
    2022-09-21T16:13:43.600551289Z I0921 16:13:43.600544       1 nodelink_controller.go:477] Matching machine not found for node "blocp-1-106-m-0.c106-1.sc.evolhse.hydro.qc.ca" with internal IP "10.17.192.33"

From @dtantsur WIP PR: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/299

Customer is waiting for this fix. The previous code change don't fix customer situation.

Please refer to this slack thread :https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CFP6ST0A3/p1664215102459219

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3214. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The installer has logic that avoids adding the router CAs to the kubeconfig if the console is not available.  It's not clear why it does this, but it means that the router CAs don't get added when the console is deliberately disabled (it is now an optional capability in 4.12).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Seen in 4.12+4.13

How reproducible:

Always, when starting a cluster w/o the Console capability

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Edit the install-config to set:
capabilities:
  baselineCapabilitySet: None
2. install the cluster
3. check the CAs in the kubeconfig, the wildcard route CA will be missing (compare it w/ a normal cluster)

Actual results:

router CAs missing

Expected results:

router CAs should be present

Additional info:

This needs to be backported to 4.12.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3501. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

On clusters serving Route via CRD (i.e. MicroShift), .spec.host values are not automatically assigned during Route creation, as they are on OCP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

$ cat<<EOF | oc apply --server-side -f-
apiVersion: route.openshift.io/v1
kind: Route
metadata:
  name: hello-microshift
spec:
  to:
    kind: Service
    name: hello-microshift
EOF

route.route.openshift.io/hello-microshift serverside-applied

$ oc get route hello-microshift -o yaml

apiVersion: route.openshift.io/v1
kind: Route
metadata:
  annotations:
    openshift.io/host.generated: "true"
  creationTimestamp: "2022-11-11T23:53:33Z"
  generation: 1
  name: hello-microshift
  namespace: default
  resourceVersion: "2659"
  uid: cd35cd20-b3fd-4d50-9912-f34b3935acfd
spec:
  host: hello-microshift-default.cluster.local
  to:
    kind: Service
    name: hello-microshift
  wildcardPolicy: None
 

Expected results:

...
metadata:
  annotations:
    openshift.io/host.generated: "true"
...
spec:
  host: hello-microshift-default.foo.bar.baz
...

Actual results:

Host and host.generated annotation are missing.

Additional info:

** This change will be inert on OCP, which already has the correct behavior. **

 

When installing OCP cluster with worker nodes VM type specified as high performance, some of the configuration settings of said VMs do not match the configuration settings a high performance VM should have.

Specific configurations that do not match are described in subtasks.

 

Default configuration settings of high performance VMs:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.4/html-single/virtual_machine_management_guide/index?extIdCarryOver=true&sc_cid=701f2000001Css5AAC#Configuring_High_Performance_Virtual_Machines_Templates_and_Pools

When installing OCP cluster with worker nodes VM type specified as high performance, manual and automatic migration is enabled in the said VMs.
However, high performance worker VMs are created with default values of the engine, so only manual migration should be enabled.

Default configuration settings of high performance VMs:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.4/html-single/virtual_machine_management_guide/index?extIdCarryOver=true&sc_cid=701f2000001Css5AAC#Configuring_High_Performance_Virtual_Machines_Templates_and_Pools

How reproducible: 100%

How to reproduce:

1. Create install-config.yaml with a vmType field and set it to high performance, i.e.:

apiVersion: v1
baseDomain: basedomain.com
compute:
- architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: worker
  platform:
    ovirt:
      affinityGroupsNames: []
      vmType: high_performance
  replicas: 2
...

2. Run installation

./openshift-install create cluster --dir=resources --log-level=debug

3. Check worker VM's configuration in the RHV webconsole.

Expected:
Only manual migration (under Host) should be enabled.

Actual:
Manual and automatic migration is enabled.

The issue found while testing HOSTEDCP-400 and HOSTEDCP-401.

Hypershift operator installed with flags:

 

--platform-monitoring=operator-only
--enable-uwm-telemetry-remote-write=true
--metrics-set=telemetry

 

Service monitors and pod monitors in the control plane:

 

[jiezhao@cube hypershift]$ oc get servicemonitor -n clusters-jz-test
NAME                                  AGE
catalog-operator                      45m
cluster-version-operator              45m
etcd                                  46m
kube-apiserver                        46m
kube-controller-manager               45m
monitor-multus-admission-controller   43m
monitor-ovn-master-metrics            43m
node-tuning-operator                  45m
olm-operator                          45m
openshift-apiserver                   45m
openshift-controller-manager          45m

[jiezhao@cube hypershift]$ oc get podmonitor -n clusters-jz-test
NAME                              AGE
cluster-image-registry-operator   46m
controlplane-operator             47m
hosted-cluster-config-operator    46m
ignition-server                   47m

 

In OCP management web console, go to Observe->Targets:

 

1. Status of service monitor 'monitor-multus-admission-controller' is Down, error:
   Scraped failed: server returned HTTP status 401 Unauthorized.
   It doesn't have cluster id in target labels
2. Target of pod monitor 'cluster-image-registry-operator' is missing, not shown

 

Description of problem:

METAL-256 introduced Ironic API proxy pods. The pods start with IPv4, but crash loop if IPv6 is used. Blocks Assisted ZTP flow (This was with converged flow DISABLED)

[root@ocp-edge34 opt]# oc get pods -n openshift-machine-api
NAME                                                  READY   STATUS             RESTARTS         AGE
cluster-autoscaler-operator-85b7c7c69b-2wdh9          2/2     Running            2 (14h ago)      15h
cluster-baremetal-operator-8555c9dc87-t5rm4           2/2     Running            0                15h
control-plane-machine-set-operator-6c4f7fff6f-fts4p   1/1     Running            0                15h
ironic-proxy-67wkh                                    0/1     CrashLoopBackOff   164 (108s ago)   13h
ironic-proxy-9qg6h                                    0/1     CrashLoopBackOff   163 (106s ago)   13h
ironic-proxy-hxft5                                    0/1     CrashLoopBackOff   164 (108s ago)   13h
machine-api-controllers-6b4f47899b-7xqb8              7/7     Running            0                14h
machine-api-operator-544587645d-9rv4m                 2/2     Running            0                15h
metal3-7688b65d7f-kc2mg                               5/5     Running            0                13h
metal3-image-cache-4w24m                              1/1     Running            0                14h
metal3-image-cache-q7p54                              1/1     Running            0                14h
metal3-image-cache-vhnkj                              1/1     Running            0                14h
metal3-image-customization-5dcd9f4fb7-lpmrq           1/1     Running            0                13h

Apache is used for the underlying proxy, and I believe the ipv6 address probably just needs to be surrounded in brackets to pass syntax.

+ python3 -c 'import os; import sys; import jinja2; sys.stdout.write(jinja2.Template(sys.stdin.read()).render(env=os.environ))'
+ exec /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND
AH00526: Syntax error on line 8 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/ironic-proxy.conf:
ProxyPass Unable to parse URL: https://fd2e:6f44:5dd8::79:6388/
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP hub 4.12.0-ec.3
2.2.0-DOWNANDBACK-2022-09-26-15-59-33

 

How reproducible:
100%

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy ocp bm compact/HA cluster with ipv6
2. Deploy MCE + Assisted Service
3. Try to deploy a spoke via full ZTP

Actual results:
Spoke BMH on Hub cluster do nothing:
mstat-0                 mstat-master-0-0-bmh                                                  true             10h
mstat-0                 mstat-master-0-1-bmh                                                  true             10h
mstat-0                 mstat-master-0-2-bmh                                                  true             10h
mstat-0                 mstat-worker-0-0-bmh                                                  true             10h
mstat-0                 mstat-worker-0-1-bmh                                                  true             10h

 

Expected results:
ZTP flow happens and spoke cluster deployed

 

Additional info:

 


Description of problem:

when install private cluster, firstly failed , then need 
ibmcloud is security-group-rule-add "${infra}-sg-kube-api-lb" inbound tcp --port-min 6443 --port-max 6443 --remote $sg 

then openshift-install wait-for  again.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

always

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. try to create cluster with BYON, in install-config.yaml publish: Internal, install failed

Actual results:

firstly time, install failed

Expected results:

Just need install once. need not manually security-group-rule-add. 

Additional info:

https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01U40AM37F/p1664439142279079?thread_ts=1663769891.358229&cid=C01U40AM37F

this issue blocked set up private cluster automatically

 

 

 

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3405. The following is the description of the original issue:

In case it should be used for publishing artifacts in CI jobs.

Look into to see if the following things are leaked:

  • pull secret
  • ssh key
  • potentially values in journal logs

Description of problem:

On storageclass creation page, the dropdown items for "Reclaim policy" and "Volume binding tyep" are not marked for i18n.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-22-143022

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Go to storageclass creation page, check if dropdown items for "Reclaim policy" and "Volume binding type" support i18n.
2.
3.

Actual results:

1. They are not marked for i18n.

Expected results:

1. Should support i18n.

Additional info:

Description of problem:

cloud-network-config-controller pod crashloops in proxy deployments as it tries to reach Openstack keystone API directly (not through the proxy) and there is no connectivity.

NAMESPACE                                          NAME                                                         READY   STATUS             RESTARTS          AGE
openshift-cloud-network-config-controller          cloud-network-config-controller-c4867b748-vlq9h              0/1     CrashLoopBackOff   158 (2m10s ago)   13h

$ oc -n openshift-cloud-network-config-controller logs -p cloud-network-config-controller-c4867b748-vlq9h
W0927 05:48:18.678947       1 client_config.go:617] Neither --kubeconfig nor --master was specified.  Using the inClusterConfig.  This might not work.
I0927 05:48:18.680269       1 leaderelection.go:248] attempting to acquire leader lease openshift-cloud-network-config-controller/cloud-network-config-controller-lock...
I0927 05:48:26.754377       1 leaderelection.go:258] successfully acquired lease openshift-cloud-network-config-controller/cloud-network-config-controller-lock
I0927 05:48:26.755413       1 openstack.go:121] Custom CA bundle found at location '/kube-cloud-config/ca-bundle.pem' - reading certificate information
F0927 05:48:28.233519       1 main.go:101] Error building cloud provider client, err: Get "https://10.46.44.10:13000/": dial tcp 10.46.44.10:13000: connect: no route to host
goroutine 51 [running]:
k8s.io/klog/v2.stacks(0x1)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:860 +0x8a
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).output(0x37696c0, 0x3, 0x0, 0xc000636000, 0x1, {0x2cbcbd8?, 0x1?}, 0xc000438400?, 0x0)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:825 +0x686
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).printfDepth(0x37696c0, 0x237798a?, 0x0, {0x0, 0x0}, 0x7fff81041af7?, {0x23a20d0, 0x2d}, {0xc00052c050, 0x1, ...})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:630 +0x1f2
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).printf(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:612
k8s.io/klog/v2.Fatalf(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:1516
main.main.func1({0x26e5638, 0xc00016c040})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/cmd/cloud-network-config-controller/main.go:101 +0x26d
created by k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection.(*LeaderElector).Run
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection/leaderelection.go:211 +0x11bgoroutine 1 [select]:
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil(0xc00052bb60?, {0x26cee20, 0xc000581740}, 0x1, 0xc00052bb60)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:167 +0x135
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntil(0xc00016c080?, 0x60db88400, 0x0, 0x20?, 0x7fea470ec108?)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:133 +0x89
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.Until(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:90
k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection.(*LeaderElector).renew(0xc0000a8120, {0x26e5638?, 0xc00016c040?})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection/leaderelection.go:268 +0xd0
k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection.(*LeaderElector).Run(0xc0000a8120, {0x26e5638, 0xc00025fcc0})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection/leaderelection.go:212 +0x12f
k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection.RunOrDie({0x26e5638, 0xc00025fcc0}, {{0x26e7430, 0xc00062afa0}, 0x1fe5d61a00, 0x18e9b26e00, 0x60db88400, {0xc00065e630, 0xc000634810, 0x0}, ...})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection/leaderelection.go:226 +0x94
main.main()
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/cmd/cloud-network-config-controller/main.go:86 +0x450

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-26-050728

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP with proxy

Actual results:

Bootstrap failure and pod crashloop

Expected results:

Successful installation

Additional info:

Please find the must-gather here.

Description of problem:

The setting of systemReserved: ephemeral-storage in KubeletConfig is not working as expected. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.z, may exist on other OCP versions as well. 

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a KubeletConfig on the node:

apiVersion: machineconfiguration.openshift.io/v1
kind: KubeletConfig
metadata:
  name: system-reserved-config
spec:
  machineConfigPoolSelector:
    matchLabels:
      pools.operator.machineconfiguration.openshift.io/master: ""
  kubeletConfig:
    systemReserved:
      cpu: 500m
      memory: 500Mi
      ephemeral-storage: 10Gi


2. Check node allocatable storage with command: oc describe node |grep -C 5 ephemeral-storage

Actual results:

The Allocatable:ephemeral-storage on the node is not capacity.ephemeral-storage - systemReserved.ephemeral-storage - eviction-thresholds (10% of the capacity.ephemeral-storage by default)  

Expected results:

The Allocatable:ephemeral-storage on the node should be capacity.ephemeral-storage - systemReserved.ephemeral-storage - eviction-thresholds (10% of the capacity.ephemeral-storage by default) 

Additional info:

The root cause might be: process argument '--system-reserved=cpu=500m,memory=500Mi' overwrote the setting in /etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf, one example:

root        6824       1 27 Sep30 ?        1-09:00:24 kubelet --config=/etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf --bootstrap-kubeconfig=/etc/kubernetes/kubeconfig --kubeconfig=/var/lib/kubelet/kubeconfig --container-runtime=remote --container-runtime-endpoint=/var/run/crio/crio.sock --runtime-cgroups=/system.slice/crio.service --node-labels=node-role.kubernetes.io/master,node.openshift.io/os_id=rhcos --node-ip=192.168.58.47 --minimum-container-ttl-duration=6m0s --cloud-provider= --volume-plugin-dir=/etc/kubernetes/kubelet-plugins/volume/exec --hostname-override= --register-with-taints=node-role.kubernetes.io/master=:NoSchedule --pod-infra-container-image=quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:4a7b6408460148cb73c59677dbc2c261076bc07226c43b0c9192cc70aef5ba62 --system-reserved=cpu=500m,memory=500Mi --v=2 --housekeeping-interval=30s


 

Description of problem:

The pod count for maxUnavailable of 2 or more is displayed as singular

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-ec.2

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a Deployment
2. Add a PDB to the Deployment and set the maxUnavailable to 2
3. Goto Deployment details page

Actual results:

The Max unavailable 6 of 3 pod

Expected results:

Should be Max unavailable 6 of 3 pods

Additional info:

 

Tracker bug for bootimage bump in 4.12. This bug should block bugs which need a bootimage bump to fix.

The previous tracker is OCPBUGS-561.

Description of problem:

seeing test failure due to panic in cvo here:

Undiagnosed panic detected in pod expand_less
              0s

                {  pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-96cf55b5-rffgt_cluster-version-operator_previous.log.gz:E0915 18:38:42.763315       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-96cf55b5-rffgt_cluster-version-operator_previous.log.gz:E0915 18:38:42.763418       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)}

full error from logs:

/E0915 18:38:42.763315       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
goroutine 187 [running]:
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic({0x1934980?, 0x2bc6240})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:75 +0x99
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash({0x0, 0x0, 0x4d2604?})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:49 +0x75
panic({0x1934980, 0x2bc6240})
	/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:838 +0x207
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*SyncWorker).calculateNext(0xc0015c6000, 0xc001df2000)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/sync_worker.go:716 +0x14d
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*SyncWorker).Start.func1()
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/sync_worker.go:575 +0x2a9
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil.func1(0x10000000000?)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:155 +0x3e
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil(0xc001df2000?, {0x1e44e60, 0xc002739f50}, 0x1, 0xc00058e0c0)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:156 +0xb6
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntil(0x0?, 0x989680, 0x0, 0x60?, 0x0?)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:133 +0x89
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.Until(...)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:90
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*SyncWorker).Start(0xc0015c6000?, {0x1e5eb30?, 0xc0000cacc0?}, 0x10?, {0x0?, 0x0?}, {0x0?, 0x0?})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/sync_worker.go:556 +0x145
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*Operator).Run.func2()
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/cvo.go:387 +0x83
created by github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*Operator).Run
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/cvo.go:385 +0x4af
E0915 18:38:42.763418       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference) 

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

currently unsure hit this in a test run, but shouldn't ever panic.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

panic in cvo pod

Expected results:

no panic in cvo pod

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3633. The following is the description of the original issue:

I think something is wrong with the alerts refactor, or perhaps my sync to 4.12.

Failed: suite=[openshift-tests], [sig-instrumentation][Late] Alerts shouldn't report any unexpected alerts in firing or pending state [apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

Passed 1 times, failed 0 times, skipped 0 times: we require at least 6 attempts to have a chance at success

We're not getting the passes - from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-azure-ovn-upgrade-4.12-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1592021681235300352, the successful runs don't show any record of the test at all. We need to record successes and failures for aggregation to work right.

Name: Routing
Description: Please change the "Routing" component to be a subcomponent "router" of the "Networking" component.

Component: change to "Networking".
Subcomponent: change to "router".

Existing fields (default assignee, default QA contact, default CC email list, etc.) should remain the same as they currently are.
Default Assignee: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Default QA Contact: hongli@redhat.com
Default CC List: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Additional Notes:
I filled in "Default CC email list" because the form validation would not permit me to omit it. However, it can be left empty in Bugzilla (it is currently empty).

If possible, we would like this change to be done prior to the Bugzilla-to-Jira migration to avoid the need to make the change after the migration.

Description of problem:

scale up more worker nodes but they are not added to the Load Balancer instances (backend pool), if moving the router pod to the new worker nodes then co/ingress becomes degraded

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. ensure the fresh install cluster works well.
2. scale up worker nodes.
$ oc -n openshift-machine-api get machineset
NAME                                  DESIRED   CURRENT   READY   AVAILABLE   AGE
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a   1         1         1       1           5h21m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b   1         1         1       1           5h21m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2c   1         1         1       1           5h21m

$ oc -n openshift-machine-api scale machineset hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a --replicas=2
machineset.machine.openshift.io/hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a scaled

$ oc -n openshift-machine-api scale machineset hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b --replicas=2
machineset.machine.openshift.io/hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b scaled

(about 5 minutes later)
$ oc -n openshift-machine-api get machineset
NAME                                  DESIRED   CURRENT   READY   AVAILABLE   AGE
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a   2         2         2       2           5h29m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b   2         2         2       2           5h29m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2c   1         1         1       1           5h29m


3. delete router pods and to make new ones running on new workers

$ oc get node
NAME                                         STATUS   ROLES                  AGE     VERSION
ip-10-0-128-45.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker                 71m     v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-131-192.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    control-plane,master   6h35m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-139-51.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker                 6h29m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-162-228.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker                 71m     v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-172-216.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    control-plane,master   6h35m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-190-82.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker                 6h25m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-196-26.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    control-plane,master   6h35m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-199-158.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker                 6h28m   v1.25.2+4bd0702

$ oc -n openshift-ingress get pod -owide
NAME                              READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE   IP           NODE                                         NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
router-default-86444dcd84-cm96l   1/1     Running   0          65m   10.130.2.7   ip-10-0-128-45.us-east-2.compute.internal    <none>           <none>
router-default-86444dcd84-vpnjz   1/1     Running   0          65m   10.131.2.7   ip-10-0-162-228.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>


Actual results:

$ oc get co ingress console authentication
NAME             VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
ingress          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         True       66m     The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: CanaryChecksSucceeding=False (CanaryChecksRepetitiveFailures: Canary route checks for the default ingress controller are failing)
console          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       False         False      66m     RouteHealthAvailable: failed to GET route (https://console-openshift-console.apps.hongli-1024.qe.devcluster.openshift.com): Get "https://console-openshift-console.apps.hongli-1024.qe.devcluster.openshift.com": EOF
authentication   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       False         True       66m     OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.hongli-1024.qe.devcluster.openshift.com/healthz": EOF


checked the Load Balancer on AWS console and found that new created nodes are not added to load balancer. see the snapshot attached.

Expected results:

the LB should added new created instances automatically and ingress should work with new workers.

Additional info:

1. this is also reproducible with common user created LoadBalancer service.
2. if the LB service is created after adding the new nodes then it works well, we can see that all nodes are added to LB on AWS console.  

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2513. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Agent based installation is failing for Disconnected env due to pull secret is required for registry.ci.openshift.org. As we are installing cluster in disconnected env, only mirror registry secrets should be enough for pulling the image.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup mirror registry with this registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406 release. 
2. Add the ICSP information in the install-config file
4. Create agent.iso using install-config.yaml and agent-config.yaml
5. ssh to the node zero to see the error in create-cluster-and-infraenv.service. 

Actual results:

create-cluster-and-infraenv.service is failing with below error:
 
time="2022-10-18T09:36:13Z" level=fatal msg="Failed to register cluster with assisted-service: AssistedServiceError Code: 400 Href:  ID: 400 Kind: Error Reason: pull secret for new cluster is invalid: pull secret must contain auth for \"registry.ci.openshift.org\""

Expected results:

create-cluster-and-infraenv.service should be successfully started.

Additional info:

Refer this similar bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990659

Description of problem:
Kebab menu for helm repository is showing inconsistent behavior

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.12

How reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create some helm chart repository
2. Go to the Helm page and switch to the repositories tab
3. Open kebab menu for different repos

Actual results:
Menus are overlapping

Expected results:
The menu should work properly; one menu should close before opening a new one

Additional info:
Video has been added for the reference

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2260. The following is the description of the original issue:

TRT-594 investigates failed CI upgrade runs due to alert KubePodNotReady firing.  The case was a pod getting skipped over for scheduling over two successive master node update / restarts.  The case was determined valid so the ask is to be able to have the monitoring aware that master nodes are restarting and scheduling may be delayed.   Presuming we don't want to change the existing tolerance for the non master node restart cases could we suppress it during those restarts and fall back to a second alert with increased tolerances only during those restarts, if we have metrics indicating we are restarting.  Or similar if there are better ways to handle.

The scenario is:

  • A master node (1) is out of service during upgrade
  • A pod (A) is created but can not be scheduled due to anti-affinity rules as the other nodes already host a pod of that definition
  • A second pod (B) from the same definition is created after the first
  • Pod (A) attempts scheduling but fails as the master (1) node is still updating
  • Master (1) node completes updating
  • Pod (B) attempts scheduling and succeeds
  • Next Master (2) node begins updating
  • Pod (A) can not be scheduled on the next attempt(s) as the active master nodes already have pods placed and the next master (2) node is unavailable
  • Master (2) node completes updating
  • Pod (A) is scheduled

Description of problem:
Latest implementation of history pruner (pr805 [1]) had increased max upgrade history in cvo to 100, and implemented a weight based pruning priority strategy for in case history length grows any larger. This pruning however is not happening, letting history grow uncontrollably, and potentially reach resource limits of etcd or kubernetes.

Observed the following while running continuous upgrade-rollback cycles:

$ oc get clusterversion version -o json | jq '.status.history|length'
203

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-23-223922
4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-23-153511

How reproducible:
1/1

Steps to Reproduce:
Same as described in bz2097067 [2], with addition of waiting a few minutes after the first rollback to allow it to reach 'Completed' state.

Actual results:
History grows uncontrollably

Expected results:
History should be pruned to keep max size of 100

Additional info:

[1] https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/805
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097067#c4

Probably for: 1h or some such; I don't think it needs to go off immediately. But in-cluster admins and folks monitoring submitted Insights should have a way to figure out that the cluster is trying and failing to submit Telemetry. The alert should not fire when Telemetry submission has been explicitly disabled.

There is an existing alert for PrometheusRemoteWriteBehind in a similar space, but as of today, the Temeletry submissions are happening via telemeter-client, due to concerns about the load of submitting via remote-write.

Description of problem:

KafkSink current desctiption in odc is `Kafka Sink is Addressable, it receives events and send them to a Kafka topic.` and this should be `A KafkaSink takes a CloudEvent, and sends it to an Apache Kafka Topic.  Events can be specified in either Structured or Binary mode.` as provided by Serverless team

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install Serverless operator
2. Create CR for knativeKafka in knative-eventing ns
3. go to dev perspective -> add -> event sink
4. Check the description of kafka sink

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

Update the description to as provided by serverless team

Additional info:

 

The application dropdown menu uses a custom component with a configuration to favorite applications, like the Project selection menu favorites projects, but its UX is inconsistent in the way it looks and behaves.

 

The Project selection UI element uses the PatternFly Menu component.  It would be better to have the Application dropdown menu looks and behavior be consistent with the PatternFly Menu component.

 

 

 

 

 

Copied from an upstream issue: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/issues/2830

What did you do?

When attempting to reinstall an operator that uses conversion webhooks by

  • Deleting the operator subscription and any CSVs associated with it
  • Recreating the operator subscription

The resulting InstallPlan enters a failed state with message similar to

error validating existing CRs against new CRD's schema for "devworkspaces.workspace.devfile.io": error listing resources in GroupVersionResource schema.GroupVersionResource{Group:"workspace.devfile.io", Version:"v1alpha1", Resource:"devworkspaces"}: conversion webhook for workspace.devfile.io/v1alpha2, Kind=DevWorkspace failed: Post "https://devworkspace-controller-manager-service.test-namespace.svc:443/convert?timeout=30s": service "devworkspace-controller-manager-service" not found

When the original CSVs are deleted, the operator's main deployment and service are removed, but CRDs are left in-cluster. However, since the service/CA bundle/deployment that serve the conversion webhook are removed, conversion webhooks are broken at that point. Eventually this impacts garbage collection on the cluster as well.

This can be reproduced by installing the DevWorkspace Operator from the Red Hat catalog. (I can provide yamls/upstream images that reproduce as well, if that's helpful). It may be necessary to create a DevWorkspace in the cluster before deletion, e.g. by oc apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/devfile/devworkspace-operator/main/samples/plain.yaml

What did you expect to see?
Operator is able to be reinstalled without removing CRDs and all instances.

What did you see instead? Under which circumstances?
It's necessary to completely remove the operator including CRDs. For our operator (DevWorkspace), this also makes uninstall especially complicated as finalizers are used (so CRDs cannot be deleted if the controller is removed, and the controller cannot be restored by reinstalling)

Environment

operator-lifecycle-manager version: 4.10.24

Kubernetes version information: Kubernetes Version: v1.23.5+012e945 (OpenShift 4.10.24)

Kubernetes cluster kind: OpenShift

Description of problem:

The Alertmanager silence create / edit form got a new "Negative matcher" option in 4.12 (see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-47734). However, there is nothing to explain what this option means and it will likely not be obvious from the label alone unless you are a