Back to index

4.12.0-rc.7

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.59

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

This includes ibm-vpc-node-label-updater!

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

There is a new driver release 5.0.0 since the last rebase that includes snapshot support:

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/releases/tag/v5.0.0

Rebase the driver on v5.0.0 and update the deployments in ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator.
There are no corresponding changes in ibm-vpc-node-label-updater since the last rebase.

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The End of General support for vSphere 6.7 will be on October 15, 2022. So, vSphere 6.7 will be deprecated for 4.11.

We want to encourage vSphere customers to upgrade to vSphere 7 in OCP 4.11 since VMware is EOLing (general support) for vSphere 6.7 in Oct 2022.

We want the cluster Upgradeable=false + have a strong alert pointing to our docs / requirements.

related slack: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CH06KMDRV/p1647541493096729

Epic Goal

  • Enable the migration from a storage intree driver to a CSI based driver with minimal impact to the end user, applications and cluster
  • These migrations would include, but are not limited to:
    • CSI driver for AWS EBS
    • CSI driver for GCP
    • CSI driver for Azure (file and disk)
    • CSI driver for VMware vSphere

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

This Epic tracks the GA of this feature

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OC mirror is GA product as of Openshift 4.11 .

The goal of this feature is to solve any future customer request for new features or capabilities in OC mirror 

Epic Goal

  • Mirror to mirror operations and custom mirroring flows required by IBM CloudPak catalog management

Why is this important?

  • IBM needs additional customization around the actual mirroring of images to enable CloudPaks to fully adopt OLM-style operator packaging and catalog management
  • IBM CloudPaks introduce additional compute architectures, increasing the download volume by 2/3rds to day, we need the ability to effectively filter non-required image versions of OLM operator catalogs during filtering for other customers that only require a single or a subset of the available image architectures
  • IBM CloudPaks regularly run on older OCP versions like 4.8 which require additional work to be able to read the mirrored catalog produced by oc mirror

Scenarios

  1. Customers can use the oc utility and delegate the actual image mirror step to another tool
  2. Customers can mirror between disconnected registries using the oc utility
  3. The oc utility supports filtering manifest lists in the context of multi-arch images according to the sparse manifest list proposal in the distribution spec

Acceptance Criteria

  • Customers can use the oc utility to mirror between two different air-gapped environments
  • Customers can specify the desired computer architectures and oc mirror will create sparse manifest lists in the target registry as a result

Dependencies (internal and external)

Previous Work:

  1. WRKLDS-369
  2. Disconnected Mirroring Improvement Proposal

Related Work:

  1. https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/pull/310
  2. https://github.com/distribution/distribution/pull/3536
  3. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10ozLoV7sVPLB8msLx4LYamooQDSW-CAnLiNiJ9SER2k/edit?usp=sharing

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

We plan to build Ironic Container Images using RHEL9 as base image in OCP 4.12

This is required because the ironic components have abandoned support for CentOS Stream 8 and Python 3.6/3.7 upstream during the most recent development cycle that will produce the stable Zed release, in favor of CentOS Stream 9 and Python 3.8/3.9

More info on RHEL8 to RHEL9 transition in OCP can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N8KyDY7KmgUYA9EOtDDQolebz0qi3nhT20IOn4D-xS4

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem? 

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb  

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)   

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

Description of problem:

IPI installation failed with master nodes being NotReady and CCM error "alicloud: unable to split instanceid and region from providerID".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. try IPI installation on alibabacloud, with credentialsMode being "Manual"
2.
3.

Actual results:

Installation failed.

Expected results:

Installation should succeed.

Additional info:

$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version             False       True          34m     Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337: an unknown error has occurred: MultipleErrors
$ 
$ oc get nodes
NAME                           STATUS     ROLES                  AGE   VERSION
jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-0   NotReady   control-plane,master   30m   v1.25.0+3ef6ef3
jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-1   NotReady   control-plane,master   30m   v1.25.0+3ef6ef3
jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-2   NotReady   control-plane,master   30m   v1.25.0+3ef6ef3
$ 

CCM logs:
E1012 03:46:45.223137       1 node_controller.go:147] node-controller "msg"="fail to find ecs" "error"="cloud instance api fail, alicloud: unable to split instanceid and region from providerID, error unexpected providerID="  "providerId"="alicloud://"
E1012 03:46:45.223174       1 controller.go:317] controller/node-controller "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="find ecs: cloud instance api fail, alicloud: unable to split instanceid and region from providerID, error unexpected providerID=" "name"="jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-0" "namespace"="" 

https://mastern-jenkins-csb-openshift-qe.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/ocp-common/job/Flexy-install/145768/ (Finished: FAILURE)
10-12 10:55:15.987  ./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337
10-12 10:55:15.987  built from commit 84aa8222b622dee71185a45f1e0ba038232b114a
10-12 10:55:15.987  release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:41fe173061b00caebb16e2fd11bac19980d569cd933fdb4fab8351cdda14d58e
10-12 10:55:15.987  release architecture amd64

FYI the installation could succeed with 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419:
https://mastern-jenkins-csb-openshift-qe.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/ocp-common/job/Flexy-install/145756/ (Finished: SUCCESS)
10-12 09:59:19.914  ./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419
10-12 09:59:19.914  built from commit 9eb0224926982cdd6cae53b872326292133e532d
10-12 09:59:19.914  release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc
10-12 09:59:19.914  release architecture amd64

 

 

Description of problem:

The pod count for maxUnavailable of 2 or more is displayed as singular

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-ec.2

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a Deployment
2. Add a PDB to the Deployment and set the maxUnavailable to 2
3. Goto Deployment details page

Actual results:

The Max unavailable 6 of 3 pod

Expected results:

Should be Max unavailable 6 of 3 pods

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1186 - https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3069 promoted ConsolePlugin CRD to v1.

The PR introduces also a conversion webhook from v1alpha1 to v1.

In new CRD version I18n ConsolePluginI18n is marked as optional.
The conversion webhook will not set a default valid ("Lazy"/"Preload") value writing the v1 object and a v1 object completely omitting spec.i18n will be accepted we no valid default value as well.

On the other side, at garbage collection time the object will be stuck forever due to the lack of a valid value for spec.i18n.loadType

Example,
create a v1 ConsolePlugin object:

cat <<EOF | oc apply -f -
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
  name: test472
spec:
  backend:
    service:
      basePath: /
      name: test472-service
      namespace: kubevirt-hyperconverged
      port: 9443
    type: Service
  displayName: Test 472 Plugin
EOF

Delete it in foreground mode:
stirabos@t14s:~$ oc delete consoleplugin test472 --timeout=30s --cascade='foreground' -v 7
I1011 18:20:03.255605   31610 loader.go:372] Config loaded from file:  /home/stirabos/.kube/config
I1011 18:20:03.266567   31610 round_trippers.go:463] DELETE https://api.ci-ln-krdzphb-72292.gcp-2.ci.openshift.org:6443/apis/console.openshift.io/v1/consoleplugins/test472
I1011 18:20:03.266581   31610 round_trippers.go:469] Request Headers:
I1011 18:20:03.266588   31610 round_trippers.go:473]     Accept: application/json
I1011 18:20:03.266594   31610 round_trippers.go:473]     Content-Type: application/json
I1011 18:20:03.266600   31610 round_trippers.go:473]     User-Agent: oc/4.11.0 (linux/amd64) kubernetes/fcf512e
I1011 18:20:03.266606   31610 round_trippers.go:473]     Authorization: Bearer <masked>
I1011 18:20:03.688569   31610 round_trippers.go:574] Response Status: 200 OK in 421 milliseconds
consoleplugin.console.openshift.io "test472" deleted
I1011 18:20:03.688911   31610 round_trippers.go:463] GET https://api.ci-ln-krdzphb-72292.gcp-2.ci.openshift.org:6443/apis/console.openshift.io/v1/consoleplugins?fieldSelector=metadata.name%3Dtest472
I1011 18:20:03.688919   31610 round_trippers.go:469] Request Headers:
I1011 18:20:03.688928   31610 round_trippers.go:473]     Authorization: Bearer <masked>
I1011 18:20:03.688935   31610 round_trippers.go:473]     Accept: application/json
I1011 18:20:03.688941   31610 round_trippers.go:473]     User-Agent: oc/4.11.0 (linux/amd64) kubernetes/fcf512e
I1011 18:20:03.840103   31610 round_trippers.go:574] Response Status: 200 OK in 151 milliseconds
I1011 18:20:03.840825   31610 round_trippers.go:463] GET https://api.ci-ln-krdzphb-72292.gcp-2.ci.openshift.org:6443/apis/console.openshift.io/v1/consoleplugins?fieldSelector=metadata.name%3Dtest472&resourceVersion=175205&watch=true
I1011 18:20:03.840848   31610 round_trippers.go:469] Request Headers:
I1011 18:20:03.840884   31610 round_trippers.go:473]     Accept: application/json
I1011 18:20:03.840907   31610 round_trippers.go:473]     User-Agent: oc/4.11.0 (linux/amd64) kubernetes/fcf512e
I1011 18:20:03.840928   31610 round_trippers.go:473]     Authorization: Bearer <masked>
I1011 18:20:03.972219   31610 round_trippers.go:574] Response Status: 200 OK in 131 milliseconds
error: timed out waiting for the condition on consoleplugins/test472

and in kube-controller-manager logs we see:

2022-10-11T16:25:32.192864016Z I1011 16:25:32.192788       1 garbagecollector.go:501] "Processing object" object="test472" objectUID=0cc46a01-113b-4bbe-9c7a-829a97d6867c kind="ConsolePlugin" virtual=false
2022-10-11T16:25:32.282303274Z I1011 16:25:32.282161       1 garbagecollector.go:623] remove DeleteDependents finalizer for item [console.openshift.io/v1/ConsolePlugin, namespace: , name: test472, uid: 0cc46a01-113b-4bbe-9c7a-829a97d6867c]
2022-10-11T16:25:32.304835330Z E1011 16:25:32.304730       1 garbagecollector.go:379] error syncing item &garbagecollector.node{identity:garbagecollector.objectReference{OwnerReference:v1.OwnerReference{APIVersion:"console.openshift.io/v1", Kind:"ConsolePlugin", Name:"test472", UID:"0cc46a01-113b-4bbe-9c7a-829a97d6867c", Controller:(*bool)(nil), BlockOwnerDeletion:(*bool)(nil)}, Namespace:""}, dependentsLock:sync.RWMutex{w:sync.Mutex{state:0, sema:0x0}, writerSem:0x0, readerSem:0x0, readerCount:1, readerWait:0}, dependents:map[*garbagecollector.node]struct {}{}, deletingDependents:true, deletingDependentsLock:sync.RWMutex{w:sync.Mutex{state:0, sema:0x0}, writerSem:0x0, readerSem:0x0, readerCount:0, readerWait:0}, beingDeleted:true, beingDeletedLock:sync.RWMutex{w:sync.Mutex{state:0, sema:0x0}, writerSem:0x0, readerSem:0x0, readerCount:0, readerWait:0}, virtual:false, virtualLock:sync.RWMutex{w:sync.Mutex{state:0, sema:0x0}, writerSem:0x0, readerSem:0x0, readerCount:0, readerWait:0}, owners:[]v1.OwnerReference(nil)}: ConsolePlugin.console.openshift.io "test472" is invalid: spec.i18n.loadType: Unsupported value: "": supported values: "Preload", "Lazy"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.12.0 ec4

How reproducible:

100% 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. cat <<EOF | oc apply -f -
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
  name: test472
spec:
  backend:
    service:
      basePath: /
      name: test472-service
      namespace: kubevirt-hyperconverged
      port: 9443
    type: Service
  displayName: Test 472 Plugin
EOF
2. oc delete consoleplugin test472 --timeout=30s --cascade='foreground' -v 7

Actual results:

2022-10-11T16:25:32.192864016Z I1011 16:25:32.192788       1 garbagecollector.go:501] "Processing object" object="test472" objectUID=0cc46a01-113b-4bbe-9c7a-829a97d6867c kind="ConsolePlugin" virtual=false
2022-10-11T16:25:32.282303274Z I1011 16:25:32.282161       1 garbagecollector.go:623] remove DeleteDependents finalizer for item [console.openshift.io/v1/ConsolePlugin, namespace: , name: test472, uid: 0cc46a01-113b-4bbe-9c7a-829a97d6867c]
2022-10-11T16:25:32.304835330Z E1011 16:25:32.304730       1 garbagecollector.go:379] error syncing item &garbagecollector.node{identity:garbagecollector.objectReference{OwnerReference:v1.OwnerReference{APIVersion:"console.openshift.io/v1", Kind:"ConsolePlugin", Name:"test472", UID:"0cc46a01-113b-4bbe-9c7a-829a97d6867c", Controller:(*bool)(nil), BlockOwnerDeletion:(*bool)(nil)}, Namespace:""}, dependentsLock:sync.RWMutex{w:sync.Mutex{state:0, sema:0x0}, writerSem:0x0, readerSem:0x0, readerCount:1, readerWait:0}, dependents:map[*garbagecollector.node]struct {}{}, deletingDependents:true, deletingDependentsLock:sync.RWMutex{w:sync.Mutex{state:0, sema:0x0}, writerSem:0x0, readerSem:0x0, readerCount:0, readerWait:0}, beingDeleted:true, beingDeletedLock:sync.RWMutex{w:sync.Mutex{state:0, sema:0x0}, writerSem:0x0, readerSem:0x0, readerCount:0, readerWait:0}, virtual:false, virtualLock:sync.RWMutex{w:sync.Mutex{state:0, sema:0x0}, writerSem:0x0, readerSem:0x0, readerCount:0, readerWait:0}, owners:[]v1.OwnerReference(nil)}: ConsolePlugin.console.openshift.io "test472" is invalid: spec.i18n.loadType: Unsupported value: "": supported values: "Preload", "Lazy"

Expected results:

Object correctly deleted

Additional info:

The issue doesn't happen with --cascade='background' which is the default on the CLI client

Description of problem:

console.openshift.io/use-i18n false in v1alpha API is converted to "" in the v1 APi, which is not a valid value for the enum type declared in the code. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-25-071630

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Load a dynamic plugin with v1alpha API console.openshift.io/use-i18n set to 'false'
2. In the v1 API the {"spec":{"i18n":{"loadType":""}}} loadType is set to empty string, which is not a valid value defined here: https://github.com/jhadvig/api/blob/22d69793277ffeb618d642724515f249262959a5/console/v1/types_console_plugin.go#L46
https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1186/files# 

Actual results:

{"spec":{"i18n":{"loadType":""}}}

Expected results:

{"spec":{"i18n":{"loadType":"Lazy"}}}

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4491. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4724. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem: Installing OCP4.12 on top of Openstack 16.1 following the multi-availabilityZone installation is creating a cluster where the egressIP annotations ("cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig") are created with empty value for the workers:

$ oc get nodes
NAME                          STATUS   ROLES                  AGE   VERSION
ostest-kncvv-master-0         Ready    control-plane,master   9h    v1.25.4+86bd4ff
ostest-kncvv-master-1         Ready    control-plane,master   9h    v1.25.4+86bd4ff
ostest-kncvv-master-2         Ready    control-plane,master   9h    v1.25.4+86bd4ff
ostest-kncvv-worker-0-qxr5g   Ready    worker                 8h    v1.25.4+86bd4ff
ostest-kncvv-worker-1-bmvvv   Ready    worker                 8h    v1.25.4+86bd4ff
ostest-kncvv-worker-2-pbgww   Ready    worker                 8h    v1.25.4+86bd4ff
$ oc get node ostest-kncvv-worker-0-qxr5g -o json | jq -r '.metadata.annotations' 
{
  "alpha.kubernetes.io/provided-node-ip": "10.196.2.156",
  "cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig": "null",
  "csi.volume.kubernetes.io/nodeid": "{\"cinder.csi.openstack.org\":\"8327aef0-c6a7-4bf6-8f8f-d25c9abd9bce\",\"manila.csi.openstack.org\":\"ostest-kncvv-worker-0-qxr5g\"}",
  "k8s.ovn.org/host-addresses": "[\"10.196.2.156\",\"172.17.5.154\"]",
  "k8s.ovn.org/l3-gateway-config": "{\"default\":{\"mode\":\"shared\",\"interface-id\":\"br-ex_ostest-kncvv-worker-0-qxr5g\",\"mac-address\":\"fa:16:3e:7e:b5:70\",\"ip-addresses\":[\"10.196.2.156/16\"],\"ip-address\":\"10.196.2.156/16\",\"next-hops\":[\"10.196.0.1\"],\"next-hop\":\"10.196.0.1\",\"node-port-enable\":\"true\",\"vlan-id\":\"0\"}}",
  "k8s.ovn.org/node-chassis-id": "fd777b73-aa64-4fa5-b0b1-70c3bebc2ac6",
  "k8s.ovn.org/node-gateway-router-lrp-ifaddr": "{\"ipv4\":\"100.64.0.6/16\"}",
  "k8s.ovn.org/node-mgmt-port-mac-address": "42:e8:4f:42:9f:7d",
  "k8s.ovn.org/node-primary-ifaddr": "{\"ipv4\":\"10.196.2.156/16\"}",
  "k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets": "{\"default\":\"10.128.2.0/23\"}",
  "machine.openshift.io/machine": "openshift-machine-api/ostest-kncvv-worker-0-qxr5g",
  "machineconfiguration.openshift.io/controlPlaneTopology": "HighlyAvailable",
  "machineconfiguration.openshift.io/currentConfig": "rendered-worker-31323caf2b510e5b81179bb8ec9c150f",
  "machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredConfig": "rendered-worker-31323caf2b510e5b81179bb8ec9c150f",
  "machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredDrain": "uncordon-rendered-worker-31323caf2b510e5b81179bb8ec9c150f",
  "machineconfiguration.openshift.io/lastAppliedDrain": "uncordon-rendered-worker-31323caf2b510e5b81179bb8ec9c150f",
  "machineconfiguration.openshift.io/reason": "",
  "machineconfiguration.openshift.io/state": "Done",
  "volumes.kubernetes.io/controller-managed-attach-detach": "true"
}

Furthermore, Below is observed on openshift-cloud-network-config-controller:

$ oc logs -n openshift-cloud-network-config-controller          cloud-network-config-controller-5fcdb6fcff-6sddj | grep egress
I1212 00:34:14.498298       1 node_controller.go:146] Setting annotation: 'cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig: null' on node: ostest-kncvv-worker-2-pbgww
I1212 00:34:15.777129       1 node_controller.go:146] Setting annotation: 'cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig: null' on node: ostest-kncvv-worker-0-qxr5g
I1212 00:38:13.115115       1 node_controller.go:146] Setting annotation: 'cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig: null' on node: ostest-kncvv-worker-1-bmvvv
I1212 01:58:54.414916       1 node_controller.go:146] Setting annotation: 'cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig: null' on node: ostest-kncvv-worker-0-drd5l
I1212 02:01:03.312655       1 node_controller.go:146] Setting annotation: 'cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig: null' on node: ostest-kncvv-worker-1-h976w
I1212 02:04:11.656408       1 node_controller.go:146] Setting annotation: 'cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig: null' on node: ostest-kncvv-worker-2-zxwrv

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

RHOS-16.1-RHEL-8-20221206.n.1
4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-12-09-063749

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Run AZ job on D/S CI (Openshift on Openstack QE CI)
2. Run conformance/serial tests

Actual results:

conformance/serial TCs are failing because it is not finding the egressIP annotation on the workers

Expected results:

Tests passing

Additional info:

Links provided on private comment.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5018. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When upgrading from 4.11 to 4.12 an IPI AWS cluster which included Machineset and BYOH Windows nodes, the upgrade hanged while trying to upgrade the machine-api component:

$ oc get clusterversion                                                                              
NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS                                      
version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        True          117m    Working towards 4.12.0-rc.5: 214 of 827 done (25% complete), waiting on machine-api

$ oc get co                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE                                                                                                                                   
authentication                             4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h47m   
baremetal                                  4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m   
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      5h3m    
cloud-credential                           4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h4m                                                                                                                                              
cluster-autoscaler                         4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m   
config-operator                            4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      5h1m    
console                                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h43m   
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h      
dns                                        4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m   
etcd                                       4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      4h58m         
image-registry                             4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h54m         
ingress                                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h55m   
insights                                   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h53m         
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      4h50m         
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      4h57m                                                                                                                                             
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      4h57m                                                                                                                                             kube-storage-version-migrator              4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h                                                                                                                                                machine-api                                4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        True          False      4h56m   Progressing towards operator: 4.12.0-rc.5                                                                                                 
machine-approver                           4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h                                                                                                                                                machine-config                             4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m                                                                                                                                             marketplace                                4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m   
monitoring                                 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h53m                                                                                                                                             
network                                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h3m          
node-tuning                                4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m                                                                                                                                             
openshift-apiserver                        4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h53m         
openshift-controller-manager               4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h56m                                                                                                                                             
openshift-samples                          4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h55m                                                                                                                                             
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h                                                                                                                                                
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h                                                                                                                                                
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h55m                                                                                                                                             
service-ca                                 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h                                                                                                                                                
storage                                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h      

When digging a little deeper into the exact component hanging, we observed that it was the machine-api-termination-handler that was running in the Machine Windows workers, the one that was in ImagePullBackOff state:

$ oc get pods -n openshift-machine-api                                                                                                                                                                                                   
NAME                                           READY   STATUS             RESTARTS   AGE                                                                                                                                                                               
cluster-autoscaler-operator-6ff66b6655-kpgp9   2/2     Running            0          5h5m                                                                                                                                                                              
cluster-baremetal-operator-6dbcd6f76b-d9dwd    2/2     Running            0          5h5m                                          
machine-api-controllers-cdb8d979b-79xlh        7/7     Running            0          94m                                                                                                                                                                               
machine-api-operator-86bf4f6d79-g2vwm          2/2     Running            0          97m                                           
machine-api-termination-handler-fcfq2          0/1     ImagePullBackOff   0          94m                                                                                                                                                                               
machine-api-termination-handler-gj4pf          1/1     Running            0          4h57m                                                                                                                                                                             
machine-api-termination-handler-krwdg          0/1     ImagePullBackOff   0          94m                                                                                                                                                                               
machine-api-termination-handler-l95x2          1/1     Running            0          4h54m                                                                                                                                                                             
machine-api-termination-handler-p6sw6          1/1     Running            0          4h57m   

$ oc describe pods machine-api-termination-handler-fcfq2 -n openshift-machine-api                                                                                                                                                        
Name:                 machine-api-termination-handler-fcfq2
Namespace:            openshift-machine-api
Priority:             2000001000
Priority Class Name:  system-node-critical
.....................................................................
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age                    From               Message
  ----     ------                  ----                   ----               -------
  Normal   Scheduled               94m                    default-scheduler  Successfully assigned openshift-machine-api/machine-api-termination-handler-fcfq2 to ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  94m                    kubelet            Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to setup network for sandbox "7b80f84cc547310f5370a7dde7c651ca661dd40ebd0730296329d1cbe8981b37": plugin type="win-ov
erlay" name="OVNKubernetesHybridOverlayNetwork" failed (add): error while adding HostComputeEndpoint: failed to create the new HostComputeEndpoint: hcnCreateEndpoint failed in Win32: The object already exists. (0x1392) {"Success":false,"Error":"The object already
 exists. ","ErrorCode":2147947410}
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  94m                    kubelet            Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to setup network for sandbox "6b3e020a419dde8359a31b56129c65821011e232467d712f9f5081f32fe380c9": plugin type="win-ov
erlay" name="OVNKubernetesHybridOverlayNetwork" failed (add): error while adding HostComputeEndpoint: failed to create the new HostComputeEndpoint: hcnCreateEndpoint failed in Win32: The object already exists. (0x1392) {"Success":false,"Error":"The object already
 exists. ","ErrorCode":2147947410}
  Normal   Pulling                 93m (x4 over 94m)      kubelet            Pulling image "quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:9aa96cb22047b62f785b87bf81ec1762703c1489079dd33008085b5585adc258"
  Warning  Failed                  93m (x4 over 94m)      kubelet            Error: ErrImagePull
  Normal   BackOff                 4m39s (x393 over 94m)  kubelet            Back-off pulling image "quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:9aa96cb22047b62f785b87bf81ec1762703c1489079dd33008085b5585adc258"


$ oc get pods -n openshift-machine-api -o wide
NAME                                           READY   STATUS             RESTARTS   AGE     IP             NODE                                         NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
cluster-autoscaler-operator-6ff66b6655-kpgp9   2/2     Running            0          5h8m    10.130.0.10    ip-10-0-180-35.us-east-2.compute.internal    <none>           <none>
cluster-baremetal-operator-6dbcd6f76b-d9dwd    2/2     Running            0          5h8m    10.130.0.8     ip-10-0-180-35.us-east-2.compute.internal    <none>           <none>
machine-api-controllers-cdb8d979b-79xlh        7/7     Running            0          97m     10.128.0.144   ip-10-0-138-246.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
machine-api-operator-86bf4f6d79-g2vwm          2/2     Running            0          100m    10.128.0.143   ip-10-0-138-246.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
machine-api-termination-handler-fcfq2          0/1     ImagePullBackOff   0          97m     10.129.0.7     ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
machine-api-termination-handler-gj4pf          1/1     Running            0          5h      10.0.223.37    ip-10-0-223-37.us-east-2.compute.internal    <none>           <none>
machine-api-termination-handler-krwdg          0/1     ImagePullBackOff   0          97m     10.128.0.4     ip-10-0-143-111.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
machine-api-termination-handler-l95x2          1/1     Running            0          4h57m   10.0.172.211   ip-10-0-172-211.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
machine-api-termination-handler-p6sw6          1/1     Running            0          5h      10.0.146.227   ip-10-0-146-227.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
[jfrancoa@localhost byoh-auto]$ oc get nodes -o wide | grep ip-10-0-143-111.us-east-2.compute.internal
ip-10-0-143-111.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker   4h24m   v1.24.0-2566+5157800f2a3bc3   10.0.143.111   <none>        Windows Server 2019 Datacenter                                  10.0.17763.3770                containerd://1.18
[jfrancoa@localhost byoh-auto]$ oc get nodes -o wide | grep ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal
ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker   4h18m   v1.24.0-2566+5157800f2a3bc3   10.0.145.114   <none>        Windows Server 2019 Datacenter                                  10.0.17763.3770                containerd://1.18
[jfrancoa@localhost byoh-auto]$ oc get machine.machine.openshift.io -n openshift-machine-api -o wide | grep ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal
jfrancoa-1912-aws-rvkrp-windows-worker-us-east-2a-v57sh   Running   m5a.large    us-east-2   us-east-2a   4h37m   ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal   aws:///us-east-2a/i-0b69d52c625c46a6a   running
[jfrancoa@localhost byoh-auto]$ oc get machine.machine.openshift.io -n openshift-machine-api -o wide | grep ip-10-0-143-111.us-east-2.compute.internal
jfrancoa-1912-aws-rvkrp-windows-worker-us-east-2a-j6gkc   Running   m5a.large    us-east-2   us-east-2a   4h37m   ip-10-0-143-111.us-east-2.compute.internal   aws:///us-east-2a/i-05e422c0051707d16   running

This is blocking the whole upgrade process, as the upgrade is not able to move further from this component.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        True          141m    Working towards 4.12.0-rc.5: 214 of 827 done (25% complete), waiting on machine-api
$ oc version
Client Version: 4.11.0-0.ci-2022-06-09-065118
Kustomize Version: v4.5.4
Server Version: 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443
Kubernetes Version: v1.25.4+77bec7a

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy a 4.11 IPI AWS cluster with Windows workers using a MachineSet
2. Perform the upgrade to 4.12
3. Wait for the upgrade to hang on the machine-api component

Actual results:

The upgrade hangs when upgrading the machine-api component.

Expected results:

The upgrade suceeds

Additional info:


Description of problem:

seeing test failure due to panic in cvo here:

Undiagnosed panic detected in pod expand_less
              0s

                {  pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-96cf55b5-rffgt_cluster-version-operator_previous.log.gz:E0915 18:38:42.763315       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-96cf55b5-rffgt_cluster-version-operator_previous.log.gz:E0915 18:38:42.763418       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)}

full error from logs:

/E0915 18:38:42.763315       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
goroutine 187 [running]:
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic({0x1934980?, 0x2bc6240})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:75 +0x99
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash({0x0, 0x0, 0x4d2604?})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:49 +0x75
panic({0x1934980, 0x2bc6240})
	/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:838 +0x207
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*SyncWorker).calculateNext(0xc0015c6000, 0xc001df2000)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/sync_worker.go:716 +0x14d
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*SyncWorker).Start.func1()
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/sync_worker.go:575 +0x2a9
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil.func1(0x10000000000?)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:155 +0x3e
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil(0xc001df2000?, {0x1e44e60, 0xc002739f50}, 0x1, 0xc00058e0c0)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:156 +0xb6
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntil(0x0?, 0x989680, 0x0, 0x60?, 0x0?)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:133 +0x89
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.Until(...)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:90
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*SyncWorker).Start(0xc0015c6000?, {0x1e5eb30?, 0xc0000cacc0?}, 0x10?, {0x0?, 0x0?}, {0x0?, 0x0?})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/sync_worker.go:556 +0x145
github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*Operator).Run.func2()
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/cvo.go:387 +0x83
created by github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo.(*Operator).Run
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pkg/cvo/cvo.go:385 +0x4af
E0915 18:38:42.763418       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference) 

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

currently unsure hit this in a test run, but shouldn't ever panic.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

panic in cvo pod

Expected results:

no panic in cvo pod

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:
Tests failure when running dev-console tests locally.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
At least on 4.11 and 4.12

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start cypress: yarn run test-cypress-dev-console
2. Run add-page

Actual results:
Fails

Expected results:
Should pass

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3761. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Events.Events: event view displays created pod
https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=event+view+displays+created+pod&maxAge=168h&context=1&type=junit&name=pull-ci-openshift-console-master-e2e-gcp-console&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Run event scenario tests and note below results: 

Actual results:

{Expected '' to equal 'test-vjxfx-event-test-pod'. toEqual Error: Failed expectation
    at /go/src/github.com/openshift/console/frontend/integration-tests/tests/event.scenario.ts:65:72
    at Generator.next (<anonymous>:null:null)
    at fulfilled (/go/src/github.com/openshift/console/frontend/integration-tests/tests/event.scenario.ts:5:58)
    at runMicrotasks (<anonymous>:null:null)
    at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:93:5)
   }

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

When attempting to load ISO to the remote server, the InsertMedia request fails with `Base.1.5.PropertyMissing`. The system is Mt.Jade Server / GIGABYTE G242-P36. BMC is provided by Megarac.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a BMH against such server
2. Create InfraEnv and attempt provisioning

Actual results:

Image provisioning failed: Deploy step deploy.deploy failed with BadRequestError: HTTP POST https://192.168.53.149/redfish/v1/Managers/Self/VirtualMedia/CD1/Actions/VirtualMedia.InsertMedia returned code 400. Base.1.5.PropertyMissing: The property TransferProtocolType is a required property and must be included in the request. Extended information: [{'@odata.type': '#Message.v1_0_8.Message', 'Message': 'The property TransferProtocolType is a required property and must be included in the request.', 'MessageArgs': ['TransferProtocolType'], 'MessageId': 'Base.1.5.PropertyMissing', 'RelatedProperties': ['#/TransferProtocolType'], 'Resolution': 'Ensure that the property is in the request body and has a valid value and resubmit the request if the operation failed.', 'Severity': 'Warning'}].

Expected results:

Image provisioning to work

Additional info:

The following patch attempted to fix the problem: https://opendev.org/openstack/sushy/commit/ecf1bcc80bd14a1836d015c3dbdb4fd88f2bbd75

but the response code checked by the logic in the patch above is `Base.1.5.ActionParameterMissing` whic doesn’t quite address the response code I’m getting, which is Base.1.5.PropertyMissing

 

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4850. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Kuryr might take a while to create Pods because it has to create Neutron ports for the pods. If a pod gets deleted while this is being processed, a
warning Event will be generated causing the "[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" to fail.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5165. The following is the description of the original issue:

Currently, the Dev Sandbox clusters sends the clusterType "OSD" instead of "DEVSANDBOX" because the configuration annotations of the console config are automatically overridden by some SyncSets.

Open Dev Sandbox and browser console and inspect window.SERVER_FLAGS.telemetry

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3358. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
Due to changes in BUILD-407 which merged into release-4.12, we have a permafailing test `e2e-aws-csi-driver-no-refreshresource` and are unable to merge subsequent pull requests.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Bring up cluster using release-4.12 or release-4.13 or master branch
2. Run `e2e-aws-csi-driver-no-refreshresource` test
3.

Actual results:
I1107 05:18:31.131666 1 mount_linux.go:174] Cannot run systemd-run, assuming non-systemd OS
I1107 05:18:31.131685 1 mount_linux.go:175] systemd-run failed with: exit status 1
I1107 05:18:31.131702 1 mount_linux.go:176] systemd-run output: System has not been booted with systemd as init system (PID 1). Can't operate.
Failed to create bus connection: Host is down

Expected results:
Test should pass

Additional info:


This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2144. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Azure IPI creates boot images using the image gallery API now, it will create two image definition resources for both hyperVGeneration V1 and V2. For arm64 cluster, the architecture in image definition hyperVGeneration V1 is x64, but it should be Arm64

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

./openshift-install version
./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-arm64-2022-10-07-204251
built from commit 7b739cde1e0239c77fabf7622e15025d32fc272c
release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp-arm64/release-arm64@sha256:d2569be4ba276d6474aea016536afbad1ce2e827b3c71ab47010617a537a8b11
release architecture arm64

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create arm cluster using latest arm64 nightly build 
2.Check image definition created for hyperVGeneration V1

Actual results:

The architecture field is x64.
###
$ az sig image-definition show --gallery-name ${gallery_name} --gallery-image-definition lwanazarm1008-rc8wh --resource-group ${rg} | jq -r ".architecture"
x64
The image version under this image definition is for aarch64.
###
$ az sig image-version show --gallery-name gallery_lwanazarm1008_rc8wh --gallery-image-definition lwanazarm1008-rc8wh --resource-group lwanazarm1008-rc8wh-rg --gallery-image-version 412.86.20220922 | jq -r ".storageProfile.osDiskImage.source"
{  "uri": "https://clustermuygq.blob.core.windows.net/vhd/rhcosmuygq.vhd"}
$ az storage blob show --container-name vhd --name rhcosmuygq.vhd --account-name clustermuygq --account-key $account_key | jq -r ".metadata"
{  "Source_uri": "https://rhcos.blob.core.windows.net/imagebucket/rhcos-412.86.202209220538-0-azure.aarch64.vhd"}

Expected results:

Although no VMs with HypergenV1 can be provisioned, the architecture field should be Arm64 even for hyperGenerationV1 image definitions

Additional info:

1.The architecture in image definition hyperVGeneration V2 is Arm64 and installer will use V2 by default for arm64 vm_type, so installation didn't fail by default. But we still need to make architecture consistent in V1.

2.Need to set architecture field for both V1 and V2, now we only set architecture in V2 image definition resource. 
https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/data/data/azure/vnet/main.tf#L100-L128 

Description of problem:

OVNKubernetesControllerDisconnectedSouthboundDatabase alert seems to fire in the e2e-aws-ovn-serial CI job. Note that something funny happens in the job itself, which is that a set of ovnkube-node pods get created and then deleted and then get recreated again and test runs. But the alert gets fired for the first set of pods that got deleted. From the initial screening of artifacts alone its not clear what happened to the old pods. This needs investigation

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12 OCP

How reproducible:

Seems like always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/27043/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-serial/1568166237639282688
2. https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/27043/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-serial/1567913444936519680

Actual results:

Alert is fired

Expected results:

Alert shouldn't be fired and this is expected in the serial job then we need to silence that alert for that job, make it flaky and not fail hard if that alert fires.

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3084. The following is the description of the original issue:

Upstream Issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/77603

Long log lines get corrupted when using '--timestamps' by the Kubelet.

The root cause is that the buffer reads up to a new line. If the line is greater than 4096 bytes and '--timestamps' is turrned on the kubelet will write the timestamp and the partial log line. We will need to refactor the ReadLogs function to allow for a partial line read.

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/f892ab1bd7fd97f1fcc2e296e85fdb8e3e8fb82d/pkg/kubelet/kuberuntime/logs/logs.go#L325

apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: logs
spec:
  restartPolicy: Never
  containers:
  - name: logs
    image: fedora
    args:
    - bash
    - -c
    - 'for i in `seq 1 10000000`; do echo -n $i; done'
kubectl logs logs --timestamps

Description of problem:

Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"    

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.22

How reproducible:  Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"

Steps to Reproduce:

Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"

Actual results: master nodes do come up.

Expected results: master nodes should come up despite that the text "master" is not in their hostname.

Additional info:

Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"    

The code for the cluster-baremetal-operator at the following link: 

https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/blob/49d7b249c5dcef8228f206eff4530a25f03b201f/controllers/provisioning_controller.go#L441

The following condition is concerning:

if strings.Contains(bmh.Name, "master") && len(bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress) > 0

The packages reveal that bmh.Name references the name inside the metadata of the BMH object. 

Should a customer have masters with names that do not include the text "master", the above condition can never become true, and so, the following slice is never created :

macs = append(macs, bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress)

 

 

Name: Routing
Description: Please change the "Routing" component to be a subcomponent "router" of the "Networking" component.

Component: change to "Networking".
Subcomponent: change to "router".

Existing fields (default assignee, default QA contact, default CC email list, etc.) should remain the same as they currently are.
Default Assignee: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Default QA Contact: hongli@redhat.com
Default CC List: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Additional Notes:
I filled in "Default CC email list" because the form validation would not permit me to omit it. However, it can be left empty in Bugzilla (it is currently empty).

If possible, we would like this change to be done prior to the Bugzilla-to-Jira migration to avoid the need to make the change after the migration.

Description of problem:

When providing the openshift-install agent create command with installconfig + agentconfig manifests that contain the InstallConfig Proxy section, the Proxy configuration does not get applied.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Define InstallConfig with Proxy section
2.openshift-install agent create image
3.Boot ISO
4.Check /etc/assisted/manifests for InfraEnv to contain its Proxy section

Actual results:

Missing proxy

Expected results:

Proxy present and matching InstallConfig's

Additional info:

 

Description of the problem:

assisted-installer-controller Job does not apply Additional Root CA Trust Bundle

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/issues/513

How reproducible:

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/issues/513

Steps to reproduce:

1.  Create cluster with proxy and additional certificate bundle

2.Install

Actual results:

Controller failed to reach service cause of self signed certificate

Expected results:

Installation succeeds

Description of problem:

When providing the openshift-install agent create command with installconfig + agentconfig manifests that contain the InstallConfig Proxy section, the Proxy configuration does not get configured cluster-wide.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Define InstallConfig with Proxy section
2.openshift-install agent create image
3.Boot ISO
4.Check /etc/assisted/manifests for agent-cluster-install.yaml to contain the Proxy section 

Actual results:

Missing proxy

Expected results:

Proxy should be present and match with the InstallConfig

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

For some reason, some of the packets on a DNS conversation to the {{openshift-dns/dns-default}} service cluster IP don't get properly denatted, i.e. the reply packet has the pod IP as source IP instead of the service IP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.25

How reproducible:

Sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Try to resolve DNS with cluster DNS

Actual results:

DNS timeout. Reply packets have the pod IP instead of the service IP the request was sent to.

Expected results:

DNS working.

Additional info:

I'll elaborate about this in the attachments, but I could find nothing wrong in nbdb or any OVN-Kubernetes or OVN logs that rang a bell.
The only interesting thing I could see was that `conntrack -L` had no reference to this conversation, so it makes kind of sense that the reply packet address is not translated back to the service IP one, but I have not been able to find the reason of this.
The query/response packets can be correlated via DNS transaction ID.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4941. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem: This is a follow-up to OCPBUGS-3933.

The installer fails to destroy the cluster when the OpenStack object storage omits 'content-type' from responses, and a container is empty.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.8.z

How reproducible:

Likely not happening in customer environments where Swift is exposed directly. We're seeing the issue in our CI where we're using a non-RHOSP managed cloud.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

The current version of openshift's corendns is based on Kubernetes 1.24 packages.  OpenShift 4.12 is based on Kubernetes 1.25.  

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Check https://github.com/openshift/coredns/blob/release-4.12/go.mod 

Actual results:

Kubernetes packages (k8s.io/api, k8s.io/apimachinery, and k8s.io/client-go) are at version v0.24.0.

Expected results:

Kubernetes packages are at version v0.25.0 or later.

Additional info:

Using old Kubernetes API and client packages brings risk of API compatibility issues.

Description of problem:
OCP v4.9.31 cluster didn't have the $search domain in /etc/resolv.conf, which was there in the v4.8.29 OCP cluster. This was observed in all the nodes of the v4.9.31 cluster.
~~~
OpenShift 4.9.31
sh-4.4# cat /etc/resolv.conf

  1. Generated by KNI resolv prepender NM dispatcher script
    nameserver 172.xx.xx.xx
    nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
    nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
  2. nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx

OpenShift 4.8.29

  1. Generated by KNI resolv prepender NM dispatcher script
    search sepia.lab.iad2.dc.paas.redhat.com
    nameserver 172.xx.xx.xx
    nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
    nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
  2. nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
    ~~~

ENV: OpenStack IAD2, IPI installation. Connected cluster.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP v4.9.31

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install IPI cluster on OpenStack IAD2 platform having cluster version 4.9.31
2. Debug to any of the node(master/worker)
3. Check and confirm the missing search domain on all nodes of the cluster.

Actual results:
The search domain was missing when checked in `/etc/resolv.conf` file on all nodes of the cluster causing serious issues in the cluster.

Expected results:
The installer should embed the search domain in /etc/resolv.conf file on all nodes of the cluster.

Additional info:

  • Cu was trying to deploy secure Kerberos on the CoreOS nodes and it failed when the IPA-client install command failed. This is when the customer noticed this unusual behavior. They did not manually update the resolv.conf file to include the $search domain. They instead added the script below to /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ and restarted NetworkManager on the node to fix this issue and installation was successful.
    ~~~
    #!/bin/bash

set -eo pipefail

DISPATCHER_FILE="/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/30-resolv-prepender"
DOMAINS="$(grep -E '\s*DOMAINS=.*iad2.dc.paas.redhat.com' $DISPATCHER_FILE \

grep -oE '[a-z0-9]*.dev.iad2.dc.paas.redhat.com' \
tr '\n' ' ')"

>&2 echo "IT-PaaS: overwriting search domains in /etc/resolv.conf with: $DOMAINS"

sed -e "/^search/d" \
-e "/Generated by/c# Generated by KNI resolv prepender NM dispatcher script \nsearch $DOMAINS" \
/etc/resolv.conf > /etc/resolv.tmp

mv /etc/resolv.tmp /etc/resolv.conf
~~~

  • Cu confirms that the $search domain was missing since the cluster was freshly installed/ They even confirmed this with a fresh new cluster as well that it was missing.
  • The fresh cluster was initially installed at v4.9.31 but was updated afterward to v4.9.43 (the latest z-stream) to see if the updates fixed anything but it didn't make any difference. The cluster is currently running v4.9.43 and shows the $search domain missing in the /etc/resolv.conf file on all nodes.

Description of problem:

Create Loadbalancer type service within the OCP 4.11.x OVNKubernetes cluster to expose the api server endpoint, the service does not response for normal oc request. 
But some of them are working, like "oc whoami", "oc get --raw /api"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.8 with OVNKubernetes

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup openshift cluster 4.11 on AWS with OVNKubernetes as the default network
2. Create the following service under openshift-kube-apiserver namespace to expose the api
----
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  annotations:
    service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-connection-idle-timeout: "1800"
  finalizers:
  - service.kubernetes.io/load-balancer-cleanup
  name: test-api
  namespace: openshift-kube-apiserver
spec:
  allocateLoadBalancerNodePorts: true
  externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster
  internalTrafficPolicy: Cluster
  ipFamilies:
  - IPv4
  ipFamilyPolicy: SingleStack
  loadBalancerSourceRanges:
  - <my_ip>/32
  ports:
  - nodePort: 31248
    port: 6443
    protocol: TCP
    targetPort: 6443
  selector:
    apiserver: "true"
    app: openshift-kube-apiserver
  sessionAffinity: None
  type: LoadBalancer

3. Setup the DNS resolution for the access
xxx.mydomain.com ---> <elb-auto-generated-dns>

4. Try to access the cluster api via the service above by updating the kubeconfig to use the custom dns name

Actual results:

No response from the server side.

$ time oc get node -v8
I1025 08:29:10.284069  103974 loader.go:375] Config loaded from file:  bmeng.kubeconfig
I1025 08:29:10.294017  103974 round_trippers.go:420] GET https://rh-api.bmeng-ccs-ovn.3o13.s1.devshift.org:6443/api/v1/nodes?limit=500
I1025 08:29:10.294035  103974 round_trippers.go:427] Request Headers:
I1025 08:29:10.294043  103974 round_trippers.go:431]     Accept: application/json;as=Table;v=v1;g=meta.k8s.io,application/json;as=Table;v=v1beta1;g=meta.k8s.io,application/json
I1025 08:29:10.294052  103974 round_trippers.go:431]     User-Agent: oc/openshift (linux/amd64) kubernetes/e40bd2d
I1025 08:29:10.365119  103974 round_trippers.go:446] Response Status: 200 OK in 71 milliseconds
I1025 08:29:10.365142  103974 round_trippers.go:449] Response Headers:
I1025 08:29:10.365148  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     Audit-Id: 83b9d8ae-05a4-4036-bff6-de371d5bec12
I1025 08:29:10.365155  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     Cache-Control: no-cache, private
I1025 08:29:10.365161  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     Content-Type: application/json
I1025 08:29:10.365167  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid: 2abc2e2d-ada3-4cb8-a86f-235df3a4e214
I1025 08:29:10.365173  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid: 02f7a188-43c7-4827-af58-5ebe861a1891
I1025 08:29:10.365179  103974 round_trippers.go:452]     Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:29:10 GMT
^C
real    17m4.840s
user    0m0.567s
sys    0m0.163s


However, it has the correct response if using --raw to request, eg:
$ oc get --raw /api/v1  --kubeconfig bmeng.kubeconfig 
{"kind":"APIResourceList","groupVersion":"v1","resources":[{"name":"bindings","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Binding","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"componentstatuses","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"ComponentStatus","verbs":["get","list"],"shortNames":["cs"]},{"name":"configmaps","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ConfigMap","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["cm"],"storageVersionHash":"qFsyl6wFWjQ="},{"name":"endpoints","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Endpoints","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["ep"],"storageVersionHash":"fWeeMqaN/OA="},{"name":"events","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Event","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["ev"],"storageVersionHash":"r2yiGXH7wu8="},{"name":"limitranges","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"LimitRange","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["limits"],"storageVersionHash":"EBKMFVe6cwo="},{"name":"namespaces","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Namespace","verbs":["create","delete","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["ns"],"storageVersionHash":"Q3oi5N2YM8M="},{"name":"namespaces/finalize","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Namespace","verbs":["update"]},{"name":"namespaces/status","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Namespace","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"nodes","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Node","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["no"],"storageVersionHash":"XwShjMxG9Fs="},{"name":"nodes/proxy","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"NodeProxyOptions","verbs":["create","delete","get","patch","update"]},{"name":"nodes/status","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"Node","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"persistentvolumeclaims","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PersistentVolumeClaim","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["pvc"],"storageVersionHash":"QWTyNDq0dC4="},{"name":"persistentvolumeclaims/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PersistentVolumeClaim","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"persistentvolumes","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"PersistentVolume","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["pv"],"storageVersionHash":"HN/zwEC+JgM="},{"name":"persistentvolumes/status","singularName":"","namespaced":false,"kind":"PersistentVolume","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"pods","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["po"],"categories":["all"],"storageVersionHash":"xPOwRZ+Yhw8="},{"name":"pods/attach","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodAttachOptions","verbs":["create","get"]},{"name":"pods/binding","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Binding","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"pods/ephemeralcontainers","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"pods/eviction","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"group":"policy","version":"v1","kind":"Eviction","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"pods/exec","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodExecOptions","verbs":["create","get"]},{"name":"pods/log","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["get"]},{"name":"pods/portforward","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodPortForwardOptions","verbs":["create","get"]},{"name":"pods/proxy","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodProxyOptions","verbs":["create","delete","get","patch","update"]},{"name":"pods/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Pod","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"podtemplates","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"PodTemplate","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"storageVersionHash":"LIXB2x4IFpk="},{"name":"replicationcontrollers","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ReplicationController","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["rc"],"categories":["all"],"storageVersionHash":"Jond2If31h0="},{"name":"replicationcontrollers/scale","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"group":"autoscaling","version":"v1","kind":"Scale","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"replicationcontrollers/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ReplicationController","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"resourcequotas","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ResourceQuota","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["quota"],"storageVersionHash":"8uhSgffRX6w="},{"name":"resourcequotas/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ResourceQuota","verbs":["get","patch","update"]},{"name":"secrets","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Secret","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"storageVersionHash":"S6u1pOWzb84="},{"name":"serviceaccounts","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ServiceAccount","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["sa"],"storageVersionHash":"pbx9ZvyFpBE="},{"name":"serviceaccounts/token","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"group":"authentication.k8s.io","version":"v1","kind":"TokenRequest","verbs":["create"]},{"name":"services","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Service","verbs":["create","delete","deletecollection","get","list","patch","update","watch"],"shortNames":["svc"],"categories":["all"],"storageVersionHash":"0/CO1lhkEBI="},{"name":"services/proxy","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"ServiceProxyOptions","verbs":["create","delete","get","patch","update"]},{"name":"services/status","singularName":"","namespaced":true,"kind":"Service","verbs":["get","patch","update"]}]}
 

Expected results:

The normal oc request should be working.

Additional info:

There is no such issue for clusters with openshift-sdn with the same OpenShift version and same LoadBalancer service.

We suspected that it might be related to the MTU setting, but this cannot explain why OpenShiftSDN works well.

Another thing might be related is that the OpenShiftSDN is using iptables for service loadbalancing and OVN is dealing that within the OVN services.

 

Please let me know if any debug log/info is needed.

Hi,

Description of problem

Bare Metal IPI provisioning is failing to provision the worker nodes. The metal3-machine-os-downloader InitContainer is getting in CrashLoopBackOff state because it cannot find virt-* commands in the container image.

> oc -n openshift-machine-api get pods | grep -v Running
NAME                       READY   STATUS
metal3-fc66f5846-gtq9m     0/7     Init:CrashLoopBackOff
metal3-image-cache-d4qcz   0/1     Init:1/2
metal3-image-cache-djzcf   0/1     Init:1/2
metal3-image-cache-p5mwg   0/1     Init:1/2
> oc -n openshift-machine-api logs deployment/metal3 -c metal3-machine-os-downloader
[omitted]
++ LIBGUESTFS_BACKEND=direct
++ virt-filesystems -a rhcos-412.86.202207142104-0-openstack.x86_64.qcow2 -l
/usr/local/bin/get-resource.sh: line 88: virt-filesystems: command not found
++ grep boot
++ cut -f1 '-d '
+ BOOT_DISK=
++ LIBGUESTFS_BACKEND=direct
++ virt-ls -a rhcos-412.86.202207142104-0-openstack.x86_64.qcow2 -m '' /boot/loader/entries
/usr/local/bin/get-resource.sh: line 90: virt-ls: command not found
+ BOOT_ENTRIES=
+ rm -fr /shared/tmp/tmp.CnCd2E3kxN
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OpenShift 4.12.0-ec.0+

Analysis

Since https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/pull/1757, the ironic-machine-os-downloader container image is built using RHEL9 repositories.

However, following upstream move of guestfs tools to a dedicated repository [1], the libguestfs packaging differs between RHEL8 and RHEL9:

  • the libguestfs-tools-c package containing most virt-* commands is now provided by the guestfs-tools package
  • the libguestfs-tools package is now provided by the virt-win-reg package which does not require the libguestfs-tools-c package anymore

Since the Dockerfile specifies only the libguestfs-tools package, the virt-* commands are not installed when using RHEL9 repositories.

A trivial fix is to update the Dockerfile to install the guestfs-tools package instead of the libguestfs-tools package.

Regards,

Denis

Description of problem:

METAL-256 introduced Ironic API proxy pods. The pods start with IPv4, but crash loop if IPv6 is used. Blocks Assisted ZTP flow (This was with converged flow DISABLED)

[root@ocp-edge34 opt]# oc get pods -n openshift-machine-api
NAME                                                  READY   STATUS             RESTARTS         AGE
cluster-autoscaler-operator-85b7c7c69b-2wdh9          2/2     Running            2 (14h ago)      15h
cluster-baremetal-operator-8555c9dc87-t5rm4           2/2     Running            0                15h
control-plane-machine-set-operator-6c4f7fff6f-fts4p   1/1     Running            0                15h
ironic-proxy-67wkh                                    0/1     CrashLoopBackOff   164 (108s ago)   13h
ironic-proxy-9qg6h                                    0/1     CrashLoopBackOff   163 (106s ago)   13h
ironic-proxy-hxft5                                    0/1     CrashLoopBackOff   164 (108s ago)   13h
machine-api-controllers-6b4f47899b-7xqb8              7/7     Running            0                14h
machine-api-operator-544587645d-9rv4m                 2/2     Running            0                15h
metal3-7688b65d7f-kc2mg                               5/5     Running            0                13h
metal3-image-cache-4w24m                              1/1     Running            0                14h
metal3-image-cache-q7p54                              1/1     Running            0                14h
metal3-image-cache-vhnkj                              1/1     Running            0                14h
metal3-image-customization-5dcd9f4fb7-lpmrq           1/1     Running            0                13h

Apache is used for the underlying proxy, and I believe the ipv6 address probably just needs to be surrounded in brackets to pass syntax.

+ python3 -c 'import os; import sys; import jinja2; sys.stdout.write(jinja2.Template(sys.stdin.read()).render(env=os.environ))'
+ exec /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND
AH00526: Syntax error on line 8 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/ironic-proxy.conf:
ProxyPass Unable to parse URL: https://fd2e:6f44:5dd8::79:6388/
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP hub 4.12.0-ec.3
2.2.0-DOWNANDBACK-2022-09-26-15-59-33

 

How reproducible:
100%

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy ocp bm compact/HA cluster with ipv6
2. Deploy MCE + Assisted Service
3. Try to deploy a spoke via full ZTP

Actual results:
Spoke BMH on Hub cluster do nothing:
mstat-0                 mstat-master-0-0-bmh                                                  true             10h
mstat-0                 mstat-master-0-1-bmh                                                  true             10h
mstat-0                 mstat-master-0-2-bmh                                                  true             10h
mstat-0                 mstat-worker-0-0-bmh                                                  true             10h
mstat-0                 mstat-worker-0-1-bmh                                                  true             10h

 

Expected results:
ZTP flow happens and spoke cluster deployed

 

Additional info:

 


Description of problem:

When the cluster install finished, wait-for install-complete command didn't exit as expected.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Get the latest agent-installer and build image
git clone https://github.com/openshift/installer.git
cd installer/
hack/build.sh
Edit agent-config and install-config yaml file
Create the agent.iso image:
OPENSHIFT_INSTALL_RELEASE_IMAGE_OVERRIDE=quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.12.0-ec.3-x86_64 bin/openshift-install agent create image --log-level debug

2. Install SNO cluster
virt-install --connect qemu:///system -n control-0 -r 33000 --vcpus 8 --cdrom ./agent.iso --disk pool=installer,size=120 --boot uefi,hd,cdrom --os-variant=rhel8.5 --network network=default,mac=52:54:00:aa:aa:aa --wait=-1 

3. Run 'bin/openshift agent wait-for bootstrap-complete --log-level debug' and the command finished as expected.

4. After 'bootstrap' completion, run 'bin/openshift agent wait-for install-complete --log-level debug', the command didn't finish as expected.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-501. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem: 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.16

How reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Edit the apiserver resource and add spec.audit.customRules field

$ oc get apiserver cluster -o yaml
spec:
audit:
customRules:

  • group: system:authenticated:oauth
    profile: AllRequestBodies
  • group: system:authenticated
    profile: AllRequestBodies
    profile: Default

2. Allow the kube-apiserver pods to rollout new revision.
3. Once the kube-apiserver pods are in new revision execute $ oc get dc

Actual results:

Error from server (InternalError): an error on the server ("This request caused apiserver to panic. Look in the logs for details.") has prevented the request from succeeding (get deploymentconfigs.apps.openshift.io)

Expected results: The command "oc get dc" should display the deploymentconfig without any error.

Additional info:

Description of problem:

The default dns-default pod is missing the "target.workload.openshift.io/management:" annotation. 

As a result when the workload partitioning feature is enabled on SNO, this pod resources will not get mutated and pinned to the reserved cpuset.

This is a regresion from 4.10. Pod spec from 4.10.17

Annotations:
...
   resources.workload.openshift.io/dns: {"cpushares": 51}
   resources.workload.openshift.io/kube-rbac-proxy: {"cpushares": 10}
   target.workload.openshift.io/management {"effect":"PreferredDuringScheduling"}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a SNO and check the annotation
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

 

Tracker bug for bootimage bump in 4.12. This bug should block bugs which need a bootimage bump to fix.

Description of problem:

See https://github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/issues/1045

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

When using an install-config with missing VIP values set in the baremetal-platform section, we attempt to get defaults for them by doing a DNS lookup on the cluster domain name. If this lookup fails, we set the error message from DNS as the default value, resulting in a very confusing error message:

[platform.baremetal.apiVIPs: Invalid value: []string{"DNS lookup failure: lookup api.test-cluster.test-domain on 10.0.80.11:53: no such host"}: ip <nil> is invalid, platform.baremetal.apiVIPs: Invalid value: "DNS lookup failure: lookup api.test-cluster.test-domain on 10.0.80.11:53: no such host": "DNS lookup failure: lookup api.test-cluster.test-domain on 10.0.80.11:53: no such host" is not a valid IP, platform.baremetal.apiVIPs: Invalid value: "DNS lookup failure: lookup api.test-cluster.test-domain on 10.0.80.11:53: no such host": IP expected to be in one of the machine networks: 192.168.122.0/23]

This has been the case since the inception of baremetal IPI, but it has gotten considerably worse in 4.12 due to the VIP fields changing from a single string to a list.

If the user doesn't supply a value and we can't generate a sensible default, we should report that the error is that they didn't supply a value, not that they supplied an invalid value that they did not in fact supply:

[platform.baremetal.apiVIPs: Required value: must specify at least one VIP for the API, platform.baremetal.apiVIPs: Required value: must specify VIP for API, when VIP for ingress is set]

Description of problem:

When adding new nodes to the existing cluster, the newly allocated node-subnet can be overlapped with the existing node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openshift 4.10.30

How reproducible:

It's quite hard to reproduce but  there is a possibility it can happen any time. 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a OVN dual-stack cluster
2. add nodes to the existing cluster
3. check the allocated node subnet 

Actual results:

Some newly added nodes have the same node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP as some existing nodes.

Expected results:

Should have duplicated node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP

Additional info:

Additional info can be found at the case 03329155 and the must-gather attached(comment #1) 

% omg logs ovnkube-master-v8crc -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes -c ovnkube-master | grep '2022-09-30T06:42:50.857'
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857031565Z W0930 06:42:50.857020       1 master.go:1422] Did not find any logical switches with other-config
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857112441Z I0930 06:42:50.857099       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node worker01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857122455Z I0930 06:42:50.857105       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.129.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:a::/64] on Node oam04.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857130289Z I0930 06:42:50.857122       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node worker01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857140773Z I0930 06:42:50.857132       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.129.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:a::/64"]}] on node oam04.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857166726Z I0930 06:42:50.857156       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:5::/64] on Node oam01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857157       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857167       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:5::/64"]}] on node oam01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857185257Z I0930 06:42:50.857157       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.6.0/23 fd02:0:0:d::/64] on Node call03.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857192996Z I0930 06:42:50.857183       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857200017Z I0930 06:42:50.857190       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.6.0/23","fd02:0:0:d::/64"]}] on node call03.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857282717Z I0930 06:42:50.857258       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.130.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:7::/64] on Node call01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857304886Z I0930 06:42:50.857293       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.130.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:7::/64"]}] on node call01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857338896Z I0930 06:42:50.857314       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:9::/64] on Node f501.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857349485Z I0930 06:42:50.857329       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:8::/64] on Node call02.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857354       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:9::/64"]}] on node f501.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857361       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:8::/64"]}] on node call02.ss1.samsung.local

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4656. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

`/etc/hostname` may exist, but be empty. `vsphere-hostname` service should check that the file is not empty instead of just that it exists.

OKD's machine-os-content starting from F37 has an empty /etc/hostname file, which breaks joining workers in vsphere IPI

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OKD w/ workers on vsphere
2.
3.

Actual results:


Workers get hostname resolved using NM

Expected results:


Workers get hostname resolved using vmtoolsd

Additional info:


Description of problem:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted due to failed liveness probes while deleting/re-creating pods on SNO

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.32

How reproducible:

Not always, after ~10 attempts

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with Telco DU profile applied
2. Create multiple pods with local storage volumes attached(attaching yaml manifest)
3. Force delete and re-create pods 10 times

Actual results:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted, making to cluster unavailable for a period of time

Expected results:

etcd and kube-apiserver do not get restarted

Additional info:

Attaching must-gather.

Please let me know if any additional info is required. Thank you!

With CSISnapshot capability is disabled, all CSI driver operators are Degraded. For example AWS EBS CSI driver operator during installation:

18:12:16.895: Some cluster operators are not ready: storage (Degraded=True AWSEBSCSIDriverOperatorCR_AWSEBSDriverStaticResourcesController_SyncError: AWSEBSCSIDriverOperatorCRDegraded: AWSEBSDriverStaticResourcesControllerDegraded: "volumesnapshotclass.yaml" (string): the server could not find the requested resource
AWSEBSCSIDriverOperatorCRDegraded: AWSEBSDriverStaticResourcesControllerDegraded: )
Ginkgo exit error 1: exit with code 1}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12.nightly

The reason is that cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator does not create VolumeSnapshotClass CRD, which AWS EBS CSI driver operator expects to exist.

CSI driver operators must skip VolumeSnapshotClass creation if the CRD does not exist.

Description of problem: After I run the golang script for OCP-53608, I find the created 

ingress-controller couldn't be deleted

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248

How reproducible: Run the script and try to delete the custom ingress-controller

Steps to Reproduce:
1.

% oc get clusterversion

NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS

version   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248   True        False         43m     Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

2. Run the script

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % ./bin/extended-platform-tests run all --dry-run | grep 53608 | ./bin/extended-platform-tests run -f -

...

---------------------------------------------------------

Received interrupt.  Running AfterSuite...

^C again to terminate immediately

Aug 18 10:35:51.087: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on all nodes

Aug 18 10:35:51.088: INFO: Waiting up to 7m0s for all (but 100) nodes to be ready

STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-test-router-tunning-77627" for this suite.

Aug 18 10:35:54.654: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on node 1

 

failed: (15m4s) 2022-08-18T02:35:54 "[sig-network-edge] Network_Edge should Author:shudili-Low-53608-Negative Test of Expose a Configurable Reload Interval in HAproxy [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

 

Failing tests:

 

[sig-network-edge] Network_Edge should Author:shudili-Low-53608-Negative Test of Expose a Configurable Reload Interval in HAproxy [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

 

error: 1 fail, 0 pass, 0 skip (15m4s)

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % 

3.  show the ingress-controllers

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator get ingresscontroller

NAME       AGE

default    113m

ocp53608   42m

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

 

4. Try to delete the ingress-controller ocp53608, when the message "ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io "ocp53608" deleted" appears, it is hanged for a long time until the error message appears.

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator delete ingresscontroller ocp53608

ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io "ocp53608" deleted

error: An error occurred while waiting for the object to be deleted: an error on the server ("unable to decode an event from the watch stream: http2: client connection lost") has prevented the request from succeedingUnable to connect to the server: dial tcp 35.194.1.60:6443: i/o timeout

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

 

5. After "ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io "ocp53608" deleted" message appears, show the ingress-controller, ocp53608 isn't deleted

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro golang % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator get ingresscontroller

NAME       AGE

default    3h

ocp53608   109m

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro golang %

 

6.  After the error message(rror: An error occurred while waiting for the object to be deleted) appears, try to show the ingresscontroller

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator get ingresscontroller

E0818 12:21:57.272967    4168 request.go:1085] Unexpected error when reading response body: net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout or context cancellation while reading body)

E0818 12:21:57.273379    4168 request.go:1085] Unexpected error when reading response body: net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout or context cancellation while reading body)

E0818 12:21:57.274306    4168 request.go:1085] Unexpected error when reading response body: net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout or context cancellation while reading body)

Unable to connect to the server: dial tcp 35.194.1.60:6443: i/o timeout

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

 

Actual results:  ingress-controller ocp53608  is still there after executed the oc delete command

Expected results:

ingress-controller ocp53608  will be deleted soon after executed the oc delete command

Additional info:

Description of problem:
When the user selects Serverless as an import strategy and tried to import a Devfile, the import fails because of an invalid Deployment.

Could reproduce this already in 4.11, but its even more prominent in 4.12 when the console automatically selects the resource type serverless when the Serverless operator is installed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Works on 4.10
Failed on 4.11 and 4.12 master

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install and setup Serverless operator
1. Switch to dev perspective, navigate to add > import from git
3. Enter a non-Devfile git URL like https://github.com/jerolimov/nodeinfo
4. On 4.11 select resource type Serverless (on 4.12 this should be selected automatically)
5. Update the git URL to a repo with a Devfile like https://github.com/nodeshift-starters/devfile-sample
6. Press create

Actual results:
Import fails with error:

Error "Invalid value: "": name part must be non-empty" for field "spec.template.labels".

Expected results:
Devfile should be imported

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-860. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

In GCP, once an external IP address is assigned to master/infra node through GCP console, numbers of pending CSR from kubernetes.io/kubelet-serving is increasing, and the following error are reported:

I0902 10:48:29.254427       1 controller.go:121] Reconciling CSR: csr-q7bwd
I0902 10:48:29.365774       1 csr_check.go:157] csr-q7bwd: CSR does not appear to be client csr
I0902 10:48:29.371827       1 csr_check.go:545] retrieving serving cert from build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal (10.0.0.5:10250)
I0902 10:48:29.375052       1 csr_check.go:188] Found existing serving cert for build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal
I0902 10:48:29.375152       1 csr_check.go:192] Could not use current serving cert for renewal: CSR Subject Alternate Name values do not match current certificate
I0902 10:48:29.375166       1 csr_check.go:193] Current SAN Values: [build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal 10.0.0.5], CSR SAN Values: [build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal 10.0.0.5 35.211.234.95]
I0902 10:48:29.375175       1 csr_check.go:202] Falling back to machine-api authorization for build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal
E0902 10:48:29.375184       1 csr_check.go:420] csr-q7bwd: IP address '35.211.234.95' not in machine addresses: 10.0.0.5
I0902 10:48:29.375193       1 csr_check.go:205] Could not use Machine for serving cert authorization: IP address '35.211.234.95' not in machine addresses: 10.0.0.5
I0902 10:48:29.379457       1 csr_check.go:218] Falling back to serving cert renewal with Egress IP checks
I0902 10:48:29.382668       1 csr_check.go:221] Could not use current serving cert and egress IPs for renewal: CSR Subject Alternate Names includes unknown IP addresses
I0902 10:48:29.382702       1 controller.go:233] csr-q7bwd: CSR not authorized

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.2

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Assign external IPs to master/infra node in GCP
2. oc get csr | grep kubernetes.io/kubelet-serving

Actual results:

CSRs are not approved

Expected results:

CSRs are approved

Additional info:

This issue is only happen in GCP. Same OpenShift installations in AWS do not have this issue.

It looks like the CSR are created using external IP addresses once assigned.

Ref: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C03KEQZC1L2/p1662122007083059

Description of problem:
project viewer is able to see a 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button on Pods list page while the creation will fail finally due to less permission, in this way console should not show a 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button for project viewer, other resources list page doesn’t have the issue

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.0-0.nightly-2021-09-16-212009

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. normal user has a project and workloads

  1. oc get all -n yapei1-project
    NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
    pod/example-787f749bb-czkms 1/1 Running 0 79s
    pod/example-787f749bb-m7wxt 1/1 Running 0 79s
    pod/example-787f749bb-mw8jv 1/1 Running 0 79s

NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE
deployment.apps/example 3/3 3 3 79s

NAME DESIRED CURRENT READY AGE
replicaset.apps/example-787f749bb 3 3 3 79s

2. grant another user with view access to user project 'yapei1-project'

  1. oc adm policy add-role-to-user view uiauto1 -n yapei1-project
    clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/view added: "uiauto1"
    3. login with user 'uiauto1' and check the permissions on Pods list page

Actual results:
3. project viewer 'uiauto1' can see pods list successfully, at the same time console also shows a 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button while the creation will finally fail if project viewer tries to create a pod

Expected results:
3. console should not show 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button for a project viewer

Additional info:
For comparison: we doesn't show resource creation button('Create xxx' button) on other workloads list page for a project viewer, such as Deployments, DeploymentConfigs list etc

Description of problem:

 

The pipeline run nodes used to show a focus border when they were in focus but no longer do.

Prerequisites (if any, like setup, operators/versions):

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Load the pipeline runs
  2. Use the tab key to move between nodes

Actual results:

There is no indication of which node has the focus

Expected results:

There should be a focus border indicating the current focus node.

Reproducibility (Always/Intermittent/Only Once):

always

Build Details:

4.12

Workaround:

Additional info:

Previously:

Currently:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3458. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Since way back in 4.8, we've had a banner with To request update recommendations, configure a channel that supports your version when ClusterVersion has RetrievedUpdates=False . But that's only one of several reasons we could be RetrievedUpdates=False. Can we pivot to passing through the ClusterVersion condition message?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.8 and later.

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Launch a cluster-bot cluster like 4.11.12.
2. Set a channel with oc adm upgrade channel stable-4.11.
3. Scale down the CVO with oc scale --replicas 0 -n openshift-cluster-version deployments/cluster-version-operator.
4. Patch in a RetrievedUpdates condition with:

$ CONDITIONS="$(oc get -o json clusterversion version | jq -c '[.status.conditions[] | if .type == "RetrievedUpdates" then .status = "False" | .message = "Testing" else . end]')"
$ oc patch --subresource status clusterversion version --type json -p "[{\"op\": \"add\", \"path\": \"/status/conditions\", \"value\": ${CONDITIONS}}]"

5. View the admin console at /settings/cluster.

Actual results:

Advice about configuring the channel (but it's already configured).

Expected results:

See the message you patched into the RetrievedUpdates condition.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3501. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

On clusters serving Route via CRD (i.e. MicroShift), .spec.host values are not automatically assigned during Route creation, as they are on OCP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

$ cat<<EOF | oc apply --server-side -f-
apiVersion: route.openshift.io/v1
kind: Route
metadata:
  name: hello-microshift
spec:
  to:
    kind: Service
    name: hello-microshift
EOF

route.route.openshift.io/hello-microshift serverside-applied

$ oc get route hello-microshift -o yaml

apiVersion: route.openshift.io/v1
kind: Route
metadata:
  annotations:
    openshift.io/host.generated: "true"
  creationTimestamp: "2022-11-11T23:53:33Z"
  generation: 1
  name: hello-microshift
  namespace: default
  resourceVersion: "2659"
  uid: cd35cd20-b3fd-4d50-9912-f34b3935acfd
spec:
  host: hello-microshift-default.cluster.local
  to:
    kind: Service
    name: hello-microshift
  wildcardPolicy: None
 

Expected results:

...
metadata:
  annotations:
    openshift.io/host.generated: "true"
...
spec:
  host: hello-microshift-default.foo.bar.baz
...

Actual results:

Host and host.generated annotation are missing.

Additional info:

** This change will be inert on OCP, which already has the correct behavior. **

 

Description of problem:

Whereabouts reconciliation is not launched when

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. oc edit the networks object and create a net-attach-def that references whereabouts – in a conflist.

Actual results:

The reconciler is not launched.

Expected results:

The reconciler is launched.

Description of problem:

Deploy IPI cluster on multi datacenter/cluster vsphere env, installer failed with some reason, then tried to destroy cluster, and found that one vm folder under one of datacenters is not deleted.

When installer exit, following objects are attached with tag jima15b-cq7z7
sh-4.4$ govc tags.attached.ls jima15b-cq7z7 | xargs govc ls -L
/IBMCloud/vm/jima15b-cq7z7
/datacenter-2/vm/jima15b-cq7z7
/datacenter-2/vm/jima15b-cq7z7/jima15b-cq7z7-rhcos-us-west-us-west-1a
/IBMCloud/vm/jima15b-cq7z7/jima15b-cq7z7-rhcos-us-east-us-east-2a
/IBMCloud/vm/jima15b-cq7z7/jima15b-cq7z7-rhcos-us-east-us-east-3a
/IBMCloud/vm/jima15b-cq7z7/jima15b-cq7z7-rhcos-us-east-us-east-1a
/IBMCloud/vm/jima15b-cq7z7/jima15b-cq7z7-bootstrap

sh-4.4$ ./openshift-install destroy cluster --dir ipi_missingzones/
INFO Destroyed                                     VirtualMachine=jima15b-cq7z7-rhcos-us-west-us-west-1a
INFO Destroyed                                     VirtualMachine=jima15b-cq7z7-rhcos-us-east-us-east-2a
INFO Destroyed                                     VirtualMachine=jima15b-cq7z7-rhcos-us-east-us-east-3a
INFO Destroyed                                     VirtualMachine=jima15b-cq7z7-rhcos-us-east-us-east-1a
INFO Destroyed                                     VirtualMachine=jima15b-cq7z7-bootstrap
INFO Destroyed                                     Folder=jima15b-cq7z7
INFO Deleted                                       Tag=jima15b-cq7z7
INFO Deleted                                       TagCategory=openshift-jima15b-cq7z7
INFO Time elapsed: 55s       

After destroying cluster, folder jima15b-cq7z7 is still there, not deleted.
sh-4.4$ govc ls /datacenter-2/vm/ | grep jima15b-cq7z7
/datacenter-2/vm/jima15b-cq7z7                    

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-18-141547

How reproducible:

always when installer fails to create infrastructure, it works when installation is successful. 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. deploy IPI cluster on vsphere env configured multi datacenter/cluster
2. installer failed to create infrastructure with some reason
3. destroy cluster
4. one folder is not deleted 

Actual results:

one folder is not deleted

Expected results:

All infrastructures created by installer should be removed

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

A nil-pointer dereference occurred in the TestRouterCompressionOperation test in the e2e-gcp-operator CI job for the openshift/cluster-ingress-operator repository.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.

How reproducible:

Observed once. However, we run e2e-gcp-operator infrequently.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Run the e2e-gcp-operator CI job on a cluster-ingress-operator PR.

Actual results:

 panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered]
	panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered]
	panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x38 pc=0x14cabef]
goroutine 8048 [running]:
testing.tRunner.func1.2({0x1624920, 0x265b870})
	/usr/lib/golang/src/testing/testing.go:1389 +0x24e
testing.tRunner.func1()
	/usr/lib/golang/src/testing/testing.go:1392 +0x39f
panic({0x1624920, 0x265b870})
	/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:838 +0x207
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash({0x0, 0x0, 0x40e43e5698?})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:56 +0xd8
panic({0x1624920, 0x265b870})
	/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:838 +0x207
github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/test/e2e.getHttpHeaders(0xc0002b9380?, 0xc0000e4540, 0x1)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/test/e2e/router_compression_test.go:257 +0x2ef
github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/test/e2e.testContentEncoding.func1()
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/test/e2e/router_compression_test.go:220 +0x57
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.ConditionFunc.WithContext.func1({0x18, 0xc00003f000})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:222 +0x1b
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.runConditionWithCrashProtectionWithContext({0x1b25d40?, 0xc000138000?}, 0xc000befe08?)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:235 +0x57
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.poll({0x1b25d40, 0xc000138000}, 0x48?, 0xc4fa25?, 0x30?)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:582 +0x38
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.PollImmediateWithContext({0x1b25d40, 0xc000138000}, 0xc000b1da00?, 0xc000befe98?, 0x414207?)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:528 +0x4a
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.PollImmediate(0xc00088cea0?, 0x3b9aca00?, 0xc000138000?)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:514 +0x50
github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/test/e2e.testContentEncoding(0xc00088cea0, 0xc000a8a270, 0xc0000e4540, 0x1, {0x17fe569, 0x4})
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/test/e2e/router_compression_test.go:219 +0xfc
github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/test/e2e.TestRouterCompressionOperation(0xc00088cea0)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/test/e2e/router_compression_test.go:208 +0x454
testing.tRunner(0xc00088cea0, 0x191cdd0)
	/usr/lib/golang/src/testing/testing.go:1439 +0x102
created by testing.(*T).Run
	/usr/lib/golang/src/testing/testing.go:1486 +0x35f 

Expected results:

The test should pass.

Additional info:

The faulty logic was introduced in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/679/commits/211b9c15b1fd6217dee863790c20f34c26c138aa.
The test was subsequently marked as a parallel test in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/756/commits/a22322b25569059c61e1973f37f0a4b49e9407bc.
The job history shows that the e2e-gcp-operator job has only run once since June: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/job-history/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/directory/pull-ci-openshift-cluster-ingress-operator-master-e2e-gcp-operator. I see failures in May, but none of those failures shows the panic.

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4401. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

cluster-policy-controller has  unnecessary permissions and is able to operate on all leases in KCM namespace. This also applies to namespace-security-allocation-controller that was moved some time ago and does not need lock mechanism.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

 
 
 

 

Description of problem:

A cluster hit a panic in etcd operator in bootstrap:
I0829 14:46:02.736582 1 controller_manager.go:54] StaticPodStateController controller terminated
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x1e940ab]

goroutine 2701 [running]:
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.checkSingleMemberHealth({0x29374c0, 0xc00217d920}, 0xc0021fb110)
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:135 +0x34b
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.getMemberHealth.func1()
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:58 +0x7f
created by github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.getMemberHealth
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:54 +0x2ac
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Pulled up a 4.12 cluster and hit panic during bootstrap

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

panic as above

Expected results:

no panic

Additional info:

 

 As mentioned in AITRIAGE-3520, there multiple attempts to grab controller logs might fail at some point and override existing logs.

In the case of the ticket I mentioned, we were able to retrieve controller logs from the logs server. However, this might not always be the case for other clusters.

We need to find a way to preserve all logs, or time out log collection differently.

 

The way we thought it can be handled is by writing logs inside container and in case kube-api is not reachable we will read logs from file

Omer Tuchfeld Nir Magnezi  Mat Kowalski 

Description of problem:

The TestReloadInterval E2E test has completely wrong validations in which the min value should be 1s, not 5s.

But there is a race condition which allow these tests to sometimes pass due to the last test condition.

Therefore, failures in CI are actually correct, and successes are wrong based on the E2E conditions.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

50%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Run TestReloadInterval E2E test (make test-e2e TEST=TestReloadInterval)

Actual results:

Sometimes fails on 5us test case:

reloadinterval_test.go:106: router deployment not updated with RELOAD_INTERVAL=5s: timed out waiting for the condition

Expected results:

Should pass E2E

Additional info:

 

 

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3441. The following is the description of the original issue:

Update the cluster-authentication-operator to not go degraded when it can’t determine the console url.  This risks masking certain cases where we would want to raise an error to the admin, but the expectation is that this failure mode is rare.

Risk could be avoided by looking at ClusterVersion's enabledCapabilities to decide if missing Console was expected or not (unclear if the risk is high enough to be worth this amount of effort).

AC: Update the cluster-authentication-operator to not go degraded when console config CRD is missing and ClusterVersion config has Console in enabledCapabilities.

Discovered in the must gather kubelet_service.log from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade/1586093220087992320

It appears the guard pod names are too long, and being truncated down to where they will collide with those from the other masters.

From kubelet logs in this run:

❯ grep openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste kubelet_service.log
Oct 28 23:58:55.693391 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1 kubenswrapper[1657]: E1028 23:58:55.693346    1657 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
Oct 28 23:59:03.735726 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0 kubenswrapper[1670]: E1028 23:59:03.735671    1670 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
Oct 28 23:59:11.168082 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2 kubenswrapper[1667]: E1028 23:59:11.168041    1667 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"

This also looks to be happening for openshift-kube-scheduler-guard, kube-controller-manager-guard, possibly others.

Looks like they should be truncated further to make room for random suffixes in https://github.com/openshift/library-go/blame/bd9b0e19121022561dcd1d9823407cd58b2265d0/pkg/operator/staticpod/controller/guard/guard_controller.go#L97-L98

Unsure of the implications here, it looks a little scary.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2384. The following is the description of the original issue:

Version:
$ openshift-install version
openshift-install 4.10.0-0.nightly-2021-12-23-153012
built from commit 94a3ed9cbe4db66dc50dab8b85d2abf40fb56426
release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:39cacdae6214efce10005054fb492f02d26b59fe9d23686dc17ec8a42f428534
release architecture amd64

Platform: alibabacloud

Please specify:

  • IPI (automated install with `openshift-install`. If you don't know, then it's IPI)

What happened?
Unexpected error of 'Internal publish strategy is not supported on "alibabacloud" platform', because Internal publish strategy should be supported for "alibabacloud", please clarify otherwise, thanks!

$ openshift-install create install-config --dir work
? SSH Public Key /home/jiwei/.ssh/openshift-qe.pub
? Platform alibabacloud
? Region us-east-1
? Base Domain alicloud-qe.devcluster.openshift.com
? Cluster Name jiwei-uu
? Pull Secret [? for help] *********
INFO Install-Config created in: work
$
$ vim work/install-config.yaml
$ yq e '.publish' work/install-config.yaml
Internal
$ openshift-install create cluster --dir work --log-level info
FATAL failed to fetch Metadata: failed to load asset "Install Config": invalid "install-config.yaml" file: publish: Invalid value: "Internal": Internal publish strategy is not supported on "alibabacloud" platform
$

What did you expect to happen?
"publish: Internal" should be supported for platform "alibabacloud".

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
Always

Currently, we have this validation  https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/asset/agent/installconfig_test.go#L103 which checks if the platform is none then the number of control planes should be 1 and workers should be zero.

We need another validation to check if the number of control planes is 1 and workers are zero, the in the install-config.yaml the platform can only be set as none and in agent-cluster-install.yaml, the platformType should only be set as none. If we try to do SNO (i.e. control planes is 1 and workers are zero)  with e.g. platform: baremetal then assisted will reject it, so we should catch it as early as possible

 Currently on summery logs if there is kube-api issue controller will not upload logs but it should as it has file to read them from

The test results in sippy look really bad on our less common platforms, but still pretty unacceptable even on core clouds. It's reasonably often the only test that fails. We need to decide what to do here, and we're going to need input from the etcd team.

As of Sep 13th:

  • several vsphere and openstack variant combo's fail this test around 24-32% of the time
  • aws, amd64, ovn, upgrade, upgrade-micro, ha - fails 6% of the time
  • aws, amd64, ovn, upgrade, upgrade-minor, ha - fails 4% of the time
  • gcp, amd64, sdn, upgrade, upgrade-minor, ha - fails 8% of the time
  • globally across all jobs fails around 3% of the time.

Even on some major variant combos, a 4-8% failure rate is too high.
On Sep 13 arch call (no etcd present), Damien mentioned this might be an upstream alert that just isn't well suited for OpenShift's use cases, is this the case and it needs tuning?

Has the problem been getting worse?

I believe this link https://datastudio.google.com/s/urkKwmmzvgo indicates that this may be the case for 4.12, AWS and Azure are both getting worse in ways that I don't see if we change the release to 4.11 where it looks consistent. gcp seems fine on 4.12. We do not have data for vsphere for some reason.

This link shows the grpc_methods most commonly involved: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=etcdGRPCRequestsSlow+was+at+or+above&maxAge=48h&context=7&type=junit&name=&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

At a glance: LeaseGrant, MemberList, Txn, Status, Range.

Broken out of TRT-401
For linking with sippy:
[bz-etcd][invariant] alert/etcdGRPCRequestsSlow should not be at or above info
[sig-arch][bz-etcd][Late] Alerts alert/etcdGRPCRequestsSlow should not be at or above info [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

 

Description of problem:

cloud-network-config-controller pod crashloops in proxy deployments as it tries to reach Openstack keystone API directly (not through the proxy) and there is no connectivity.

NAMESPACE                                          NAME                                                         READY   STATUS             RESTARTS          AGE
openshift-cloud-network-config-controller          cloud-network-config-controller-c4867b748-vlq9h              0/1     CrashLoopBackOff   158 (2m10s ago)   13h

$ oc -n openshift-cloud-network-config-controller logs -p cloud-network-config-controller-c4867b748-vlq9h
W0927 05:48:18.678947       1 client_config.go:617] Neither --kubeconfig nor --master was specified.  Using the inClusterConfig.  This might not work.
I0927 05:48:18.680269       1 leaderelection.go:248] attempting to acquire leader lease openshift-cloud-network-config-controller/cloud-network-config-controller-lock...
I0927 05:48:26.754377       1 leaderelection.go:258] successfully acquired lease openshift-cloud-network-config-controller/cloud-network-config-controller-lock
I0927 05:48:26.755413       1 openstack.go:121] Custom CA bundle found at location '/kube-cloud-config/ca-bundle.pem' - reading certificate information
F0927 05:48:28.233519       1 main.go:101] Error building cloud provider client, err: Get "https://10.46.44.10:13000/": dial tcp 10.46.44.10:13000: connect: no route to host
goroutine 51 [running]:
k8s.io/klog/v2.stacks(0x1)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:860 +0x8a
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).output(0x37696c0, 0x3, 0x0, 0xc000636000, 0x1, {0x2cbcbd8?, 0x1?}, 0xc000438400?, 0x0)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:825 +0x686
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).printfDepth(0x37696c0, 0x237798a?, 0x0, {0x0, 0x0}, 0x7fff81041af7?, {0x23a20d0, 0x2d}, {0xc00052c050, 0x1, ...})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:630 +0x1f2
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).printf(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:612
k8s.io/klog/v2.Fatalf(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:1516
main.main.func1({0x26e5638, 0xc00016c040})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/cmd/cloud-network-config-controller/main.go:101 +0x26d
created by k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection.(*LeaderElector).Run
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection/leaderelection.go:211 +0x11bgoroutine 1 [select]:
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil(0xc00052bb60?, {0x26cee20, 0xc000581740}, 0x1, 0xc00052bb60)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:167 +0x135
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntil(0xc00016c080?, 0x60db88400, 0x0, 0x20?, 0x7fea470ec108?)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:133 +0x89
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.Until(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/wait.go:90
k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection.(*LeaderElector).renew(0xc0000a8120, {0x26e5638?, 0xc00016c040?})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection/leaderelection.go:268 +0xd0
k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection.(*LeaderElector).Run(0xc0000a8120, {0x26e5638, 0xc00025fcc0})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection/leaderelection.go:212 +0x12f
k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection.RunOrDie({0x26e5638, 0xc00025fcc0}, {{0x26e7430, 0xc00062afa0}, 0x1fe5d61a00, 0x18e9b26e00, 0x60db88400, {0xc00065e630, 0xc000634810, 0x0}, ...})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection/leaderelection.go:226 +0x94
main.main()
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/cmd/cloud-network-config-controller/main.go:86 +0x450

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-26-050728

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP with proxy

Actual results:

Bootstrap failure and pod crashloop

Expected results:

Successful installation

Additional info:

Please find the must-gather here.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3993. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
On Openshift on Openstack CI, we are deploying an OCP cluster with an additional network on the workers in install-config.yaml for integration with Openstack Manila.

compute:
- name: worker
  platform:
    openstack:
      zones: []
      additionalNetworkIDs: ['0eeae16f-bbc7-4e49-90b2-d96419b7c30d']
  replicas: 3

As a result, the egressIP annotation includes two interfaces definition:

$ oc get node ostest-hp9ld-worker-0-gdp5k -o json | jq -r '.metadata.annotations["cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig"]' | jq .                                 
[
  {
    "interface": "207beb76-5476-4a05-b412-d0cc53ab00a7",
    "ifaddr": {
      "ipv4": "10.46.44.64/26"
    },
    "capacity": {
      "ip": 8
    }
  },
  {
    "interface": "2baf2232-87f7-4ad5-bd80-b6586de08435",
    "ifaddr": {
      "ipv4": "172.17.5.0/24"
    },
    "capacity": {
      "ip": 10
    }
  }
]

According to Huiran Wang, egressIP only works for primary interface on the node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-22-012345
RHOS-16.1-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

Deploy cluster with additional Network on the workers

Actual results:

It is possible to select an egressIP network for a secondary interface

Expected results:

Only primary subnet can be chosen for egressIP

Additional info:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPQE-12968

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5164. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

It looks like the ODC doesn't register KNATIVE_SERVING and KNATIVE_EVENTING flags. Those are based on KnativeServing and KnativeEventing CRs, but they are looking for v1alpha1 version of those: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/f72519fdf2267ad91cc0aa51467113cc36423a49/frontend/packages/knative-plugin/console-extensions.json#L6-L8
This PR https://github.com/openshift-knative/serverless-operator/pull/1695 moved the CRs to v1beta1, and that breaks that ODC discovery.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift 4.8, Serverless Operator 1.27

Additional info:

https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CHGU4P8UU/p1671634903447019

 

Description of problem:

Alert actions are not triggering modal from where storage cluster can be expanded.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

1/1

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Fill up a storage cluster to 80%
2. Alert is seen in cluster dashboard.
3. Click the Add Capacity button

Actual results:

Modal is not launched.

Expected results:

Modal should be launched.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

This bug is a copy of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137616 as fix needs to go on OCP side.
For must gather and attached screenshots please refer the bugzilla.
Add Capacity button does not exist after upgrade OCP version [OCP4.11->OCP4.12]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

ODF Version:4.11.3-3
OCP Version: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-24-103753
Provider: AWS

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Install ODF4.11 +OCP4.11
2.Upgrade OCP4.11 to OCP4.12
3.Log in to the OpenShift Web Console.
4.Click Operators → Installed Operators.
5.Click OpenShift Data Foundation Operator.
6.Click the Storage Systems tab.
7.Click the Action Menu (⋮) on the far right of the storage system name to extend the options menu.
"Add Capacity" button does not exist on menu.
*Attached Screenshot 

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

The Alertmanager silence create / edit form got a new "Negative matcher" option in 4.12 (see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-47734). However, there is nothing to explain what this option means and it will likely not be obvious from the label alone unless you are already quite familiar with Alertmanager.

After discussion with the docs team, it was decided that adding some explanation in context in the UI would be much better than adding an explanation to the documentation. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Go to Admin perspective
2. Go to Observe > Alerting > Silences page
3. Click on the Create button ("Negative matcher" option is shown with no explanation)

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

TO address: 'Static Pod is managed but errored" err="managed container xxx does not have Resource.Requests'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3633. The following is the description of the original issue:

I think something is wrong with the alerts refactor, or perhaps my sync to 4.12.

Failed: suite=[openshift-tests], [sig-instrumentation][Late] Alerts shouldn't report any unexpected alerts in firing or pending state [apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

Passed 1 times, failed 0 times, skipped 0 times: we require at least 6 attempts to have a chance at success

We're not getting the passes - from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-azure-ovn-upgrade-4.12-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1592021681235300352, the successful runs don't show any record of the test at all. We need to record successes and failures for aggregation to work right.

Description of problem:

Seeing intermittently during cluster installs

Network operator stuck in Progressing with 

network                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451   True        True          False      117m    DaemonSet "/openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)


MG: http://shell.lab.bos.redhat.com/~anusaxen/must-gather.local.5450303633101217331/

iptables-save on master-2 node - http://shell.lab.bos.redhat.com/~anusaxen/iptables-save


pod events
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age                   From               Message
  ----     ------                  ----                  ----               -------
  Normal   Scheduled               129m                  default-scheduler  Successfully assigned openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target-gnld6 to qe-anurag114e-9xkz4-master-2.c.openshift-qe.internal
  Warning  FailedMount             128m (x7 over 129m)   kubelet            MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "kube-api-access-kfg5s" : [object "openshift-network-diagnostics"/"kube-root-ca.crt" not registered, object "openshift-network-diagnostics"/"openshift-service-ca.crt" not registered]
  Warning  NetworkNotReady         128m (x18 over 129m)  kubelet            network is not ready: container runtime network not ready: NetworkReady=false reason:NetworkPluginNotReady message:Network plugin returns error: No CNI configuration file in /etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/. Has your network provider started?
  Warning  ErrorAddingLogicalPort  127m (x2 over 127m)   controlplane       addLogicalPort failed for openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target-gnld6: unable to parse node L3 gw annotation: k8s.ovn.org/l3-gateway-config annotation not found for node "qe-anurag114e-9xkz4-master-2.c.openshift-qe.internal"
  Normal   AddedInterface          127m                  multus             Add eth0 [10.130.0.3/23] from ovn-kubernetes
  Warning  ProbeError              9m (x16 over 71m)     kubelet            Readiness probe error: Get "http://10.130.0.3:8080/": dial tcp 10.130.0.3:8080: i/o timeout (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
body:
  Warning  ProbeError  4m (x717 over 126m)  kubelet  Readiness probe error: Get "http://10.130.0.3:8080/": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
body:




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451

How reproducible:

rare

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Install OCP with OVNKubernetes with HO enabled

defaultNetwork:
    type: OVNKubernetes
    ovnKubernetesConfig:
      hybridOverlayConfig:
        hybridClusterNetwork: []

2.
3.

Actual results:

Installation stuck due to network-check-target issue 

Expected results:

Installation should succeed

Additional info:

Will add additional logs

 

 

 

 

Description of problem:

The current version of openshift/cluster-dns-operator vendors Kubernetes 1.24 packages.  OpenShift 4.12 is based on Kubernetes 1.25.  

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Check https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/blob/release-4.12/go.mod  

Actual results:

Kubernetes packages (k8s.io/api, k8s.io/apimachinery, and k8s.io/client-go) are at version v0.24.0.

Expected results:

Kubernetes packages are at version v0.25.0 or later.

Additional info:

Using old Kubernetes API and client packages brings risk of API compatibility issues.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4181. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

After configuring a webhook receiver in alertmanager to send alerts to an external tool, a customer noticed that when receiving alerts they have as source "https:///<console-url>" (notice the 3 /).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

https:///<console-url>

Expected results:

https://<console-url>

Additional info:

After investigating I discovered that the problem might be in the CMO code:

→ oc get Alertmanager main -o yaml | grep externalUrl
  externalUrl: https:/console-openshift-console.apps.jakumar-2022-11-27-224014.devcluster.openshift.com/monitoring
→ oc get Prometheus k8s -o yaml | grep externalUrl
  externalUrl: https:/console-openshift-console.apps.jakumar-2022-11-27-224014.devcluster.openshift.com/monitoring

Description of problem:

Large OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24 - Cluster is failing to update router-certs secret in openshift-config-managed namespace as the given secret is too big.

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

The OpenShift Container Platform 4 - Cluster has 180 IngressController configured with endpointPublishingStrategy set to private.

Now the default certificate needs to be replaced but is not properly replicated to openshift-authentication namespace and potentially other location because of the problem mentioned (since the required secret can not be updated)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OpenShift Container Platform 4.10
2. Create 180 IngressController with specific certificates
3. Check openshift-ingress-operator logs to see how it fails to update/create the necessary secret in openshift-config-managed

Actual results:

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

Expected results:

No matter how many IngressController is created, secret management taken care by Operators need to work, even if data exceed 1 MB size limitation. In that case an approach needs to exist to split data into multiple secrets or handle it otherwise.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

When solving flakiness of a test in IO tests, we found that there are some issues in the cluster_version_matches condition for the conditional gatherer. 

Firstly the character limit should be increased as 32 characters does not cover every possible release version as some exceed that limit. 
Furthermore, there is an error in the schema

https://github.com/openshift/insights-operator/blob/master/pkg/gatherers/conditional/gathering_rule.schema.json#L101

There is no name, it should be version

How reproducible:

Sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Spin a cluster from a PR
2. If version exceeds 32 characters, we get in the pod logs: 'Could not get version from string: "<"'
 

Actual results:

'Could not get version from string: "<"'

Expected results:

Metadata should contain "Metadata should contain invalid range error"

Additional info:

However, since there's the possibility for versions to exceed 32 characters, we shouldn't expect an error in this situation. Therefore, there might be more than one issue.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2513. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Agent based installation is failing for Disconnected env due to pull secret is required for registry.ci.openshift.org. As we are installing cluster in disconnected env, only mirror registry secrets should be enough for pulling the image.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup mirror registry with this registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406 release. 
2. Add the ICSP information in the install-config file
4. Create agent.iso using install-config.yaml and agent-config.yaml
5. ssh to the node zero to see the error in create-cluster-and-infraenv.service. 

Actual results:

create-cluster-and-infraenv.service is failing with below error:
 
time="2022-10-18T09:36:13Z" level=fatal msg="Failed to register cluster with assisted-service: AssistedServiceError Code: 400 Href:  ID: 400 Kind: Error Reason: pull secret for new cluster is invalid: pull secret must contain auth for \"registry.ci.openshift.org\""

Expected results:

create-cluster-and-infraenv.service should be successfully started.

Additional info:

Refer this similar bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990659

Description of problem:

This PR: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1612/files removed the fallback logic of checking for the hosts kubeconfig file when apiserver-url.env was not populated on the machine. In IBM Cloud ROKS (both public cloud + Satellite (Hypershift)) this file is not populated. This means that any upgrade to 4.12 will result in the cluster network operator failing and cause impacts to the cluster.

I am proposing the following plan: First, this PR is held till 4.13. Second: IBM Cloud ROKS team will ensure from the initial release of 4.12 that this file is populated in it's entire fleet of workers (4.12 and beyond). Holding this to 4.13 will allow a seamless upgrade experience when the user upgrades the control plane to 4.12 but the workers are still 4.11. Then when the user goes to upgrade to 4.13: their workers will all be at 4.12 which is guarenteed to have this file and the logic to remove the check for the host kubeconfig can be removed.

For full disclosure was brought up that we could go and push a daemonset across our entire fleet of 16000+ ROKS clusters that just lays down the file but that still introduces race conditions with the network-operator and results in significant resource increase of cluster workload across our entire fleet that the plan I proposed above would remove

Example on a ROKS on Satellite worker showing that this file does not exist (yet): 
[root@tyler-test-24 ~]# ls /etc/kubernetes/apiserver-url.env
ls: cannot access '/etc/kubernetes/apiserver-url.env': No such file or directory

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Sample archive with both resources:

archives/compressed/3c/3cc4318d-e564-450b-b16e-51ef279b87fa/202209/30/200617.tar.gz

Sample query to find more archives:

with t as (
  select
    cluster_id,
    file_path,
    json_extract_scalar(content, '$.kind') as kind
  from raw_io_archives
  where date = '2022-09-30' and file_path like 'config/storage/%'
)
select cluster_id, count(*) as cnt
from t
group by cluster_id
order by cnt desc;

Description of the problem:

During install, we assume all PVs on a host have been added to a volume group and only remove them if they are. This could let other PVs that are not attached to volume groups persist and prevent coreos from installing properly. 

Relevant assisted installer links:

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/blob/9bec593930995220a2a4550b067f5a186de3b042/src/installer/installer.go#L809 

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/blob/9bec593930995220a2a4550b067f5a186de3b042/src/ops/ops.go#L414

 

Found while investigating triage issue https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-4017 

See slack thread for more details https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C02CP89N4VC/p1663263128420489 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Create a host with a PV w/o a volume group

2. Add host to cluster and install 

3. Observe the install fail

Actual results:

Installation fails with 

"Error: checking for exclusive access to /dev/sda 
Caused by:
| 0: couldn't reread partition table: device is in use |
| 1: EBUSY: Device or resource busy" 

Expected results:

All PVs and VGs are removed so that the installation will succeed

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3278. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When doing openshift-install agent create image, one should not need to provide platform specific data like boot MAC addresses.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create install-config with only VIPs in Baremetal platform section

apiVersion: v1
metadata:
  name: foo
baseDomain: test.metalkube.org
networking:
  clusterNetwork:
    - cidr: 10.128.0.0/14
      hostPrefix: 23
  machineNetwork:
    - cidr: 192.168.122.0/23
  networkType: OpenShiftSDN
  serviceNetwork:
    - 172.30.0.0/16
compute:
  - architecture: amd64
    hyperthreading: Enabled
    name: worker
    platform: {}
    replicas: 0
controlPlane:
  name: master
  replicas: 3
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  architecture: amd64
platform:
  baremetal:
    apiVIPs:
      - 192.168.122.10
    ingressVIPs: