Back to index

4.12.16

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.59

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

This includes ibm-vpc-node-label-updater!

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector

There is a new driver release 5.0.0 since the last rebase that includes snapshot support:

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/releases/tag/v5.0.0

Rebase the driver on v5.0.0 and update the deployments in ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator.
There are no corresponding changes in ibm-vpc-node-label-updater since the last rebase.

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The End of General support for vSphere 6.7 will be on October 15, 2022. So, vSphere 6.7 will be deprecated for 4.11.

We want to encourage vSphere customers to upgrade to vSphere 7 in OCP 4.11 since VMware is EOLing (general support) for vSphere 6.7 in Oct 2022.

We want the cluster Upgradeable=false + have a strong alert pointing to our docs / requirements.

related slack: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CH06KMDRV/p1647541493096729

Epic Goal

  • Enable the migration from a storage intree driver to a CSI based driver with minimal impact to the end user, applications and cluster
  • These migrations would include, but are not limited to:
    • CSI driver for AWS EBS
    • CSI driver for GCP
    • CSI driver for Azure (file and disk)
    • CSI driver for VMware vSphere

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

This Epic tracks the GA of this feature

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OC mirror is GA product as of Openshift 4.11 .

The goal of this feature is to solve any future customer request for new features or capabilities in OC mirror 

Epic Goal

  • Mirror to mirror operations and custom mirroring flows required by IBM CloudPak catalog management

Why is this important?

  • IBM needs additional customization around the actual mirroring of images to enable CloudPaks to fully adopt OLM-style operator packaging and catalog management
  • IBM CloudPaks introduce additional compute architectures, increasing the download volume by 2/3rds to day, we need the ability to effectively filter non-required image versions of OLM operator catalogs during filtering for other customers that only require a single or a subset of the available image architectures
  • IBM CloudPaks regularly run on older OCP versions like 4.8 which require additional work to be able to read the mirrored catalog produced by oc mirror

Scenarios

  1. Customers can use the oc utility and delegate the actual image mirror step to another tool
  2. Customers can mirror between disconnected registries using the oc utility
  3. The oc utility supports filtering manifest lists in the context of multi-arch images according to the sparse manifest list proposal in the distribution spec

Acceptance Criteria

  • Customers can use the oc utility to mirror between two different air-gapped environments
  • Customers can specify the desired computer architectures and oc mirror will create sparse manifest lists in the target registry as a result

Dependencies (internal and external)

Previous Work:

  1. WRKLDS-369
  2. Disconnected Mirroring Improvement Proposal

Related Work:

  1. https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/pull/310
  2. https://github.com/distribution/distribution/pull/3536
  3. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10ozLoV7sVPLB8msLx4LYamooQDSW-CAnLiNiJ9SER2k/edit?usp=sharing

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

Overview 

HyperShift came to life to serve multiple goals, some are main near-term, some are secondary that serve well long-term. 

Main Goals for hosted control planes (HyperShift)

  • Optimize OpenShift for Cost/footprint/ which improves our competitive stance against the *KSes
  • Establish separation of concerns which makes it more resilient for SRE to manage their workload clusters (be it security, configuration management, etc).
  • Simplify and enhance multi-cluster management experience especially since multi-cluster is becoming an industry need nowadays. 

Secondary Goals

HyperShift opens up doors to penetrate the market. HyperShift enables true hybrid (CP and Workers decoupled, mixed IaaS, mixed Arch,...). An architecture that opens up more options to target new opportunities in the cloud space. For more details on this one check: Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

 

Hosted Control Planes (HyperShift) Map 

To bring hosted control planes to our customers, we need the means to ship it. Today MCE is how HyperShift shipped, and installed so that customers can use it. There are two main customers for hosted-control-planes: 

 

  • Self-managed: In that case, Red Hat would provide hosted control planes as a service that is managed and SREed by the customer for their tenants (hence “self”-managed). In this management model, our external customers are the direct consumers of the multi-cluster control plane as a servie. Once MCE is installed, they can start to self-service dedicated control planes. 

 

  • Managed: This is OpenShift as a managed service, today we only “manage” the CP, and share the responsibility for other system components, more info here. To reduce management costs incurred by service delivery organizations which translates to operating profit (by reducing variable costs per control-plane), as well as to improve user experience, lower platform overhead (allow customers to focus mostly on writing applications and not concern themselves with infrastructure artifacts), and improve the cluster provisioning experience. HyperShift is shipped via MCE, and delivered to Red Hat managed SREs (same consumption route). However, for managed services, additional tooling needs to be refactored to support the new provisioning path. Furthermore, unlike self-managed where customers are free to bring their own observability stack, Red Hat managed SREs need to observe the managed fleet to ensure compliance with SLOs/SLIs/…

 

If you have noticed, MCE is the delivery mechanism for both management models. The difference between managed and self-managed is the consumer persona. For self-managed, it's the customer SRE for managed its the RH SRE

High-level Requirements

For us to ship HyperShift in the product (as hosted control planes) in either management model, there is a necessary readiness checklist that we need to satisfy. Below are the high-level requirements needed before GA: 

 

  • Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story (with MCE)
  • Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption  
  • Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components.  
  • Hosted control planes has an HA and a DR story
  • Hosted control planes is in parity with top-level add-on operators 
  • Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption
  • Hosted control planes is observable  
  • HyperShift as a backend to managed services is fully unblocked.

 

Please also have a look at our What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness? doc. 

Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story

Multi-cluster is becoming an industry need today not because this is where trend is going but because it’s the only viable path today to solve for many of our customer’s use-cases. Below is some reasoning why multi-cluster is a NEED:

 

 

As a result, multi-cluster management is a defining category in the market where Red Hat plays a key role. Today Red Hat solves for multi-cluster via RHACM and MCE. The goal is to simplify fleet management complexity by providing a single pane of glass to observe, secure, police, govern, configure a fleet. I.e., the operand is no longer one cluster but a set, a fleet of clusters. 

HyperShift logically centralized architecture, as well as native separation of concerns and superior cluster lifecyle management experience, makes it a great fit as the foundation of our multi-cluster management story. 

Thus the following stories are important for HyperShift: 

  • When lifecycling OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported providers from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to use a consistent UI so I can manage and operate (observe, govern,...) a fleet of clusters.
  • I want to specify HA constraints (e.g., deploy my clusters in different regions) while ensuring acceptable QoS (e.g., latency boundaries) to ensure/reduce any potential downtime for my workloads. 
  • When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported provider from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to backup any critical data so I am able to restore them in case of hosting service cluster (management cluster) failure. 

Refs:

Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption.

 

HyperShift is the core engine that will be used to provide hosted control-planes for consumption in managed and self-managed. 

 

Main user story:  When life cycling clusters as a cluster service consumer via HyperShift core APIs, I want to use a stable/backward compatible API that is less susceptible to future changes so I can provide availability guarantees. 

 

Ref: What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness?

Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components. 

 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumptions

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

HyperShift - proposed cuts from data plane

HyperShift has an HA and a DR story

When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin) I want to be able to migrate CPs from one hosting service cluster to another:

  • as means for disaster recovery in the case of total failure
  • so that scaling pressures on a management cluster can be mitigated or a management cluster can be decommissioned.

More information: 

 

Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption

To understand usage patterns and inform our decision making for the product. We need to be able to measure adoption and assess usage.

See Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

Hosted control plane is observable  

Whether it's managed or self-managed, it’s pertinent to report health metrics to be able to create meaningful Service Level Objectives (SLOs), alert of failure to meet our availability guarantees. This is especially important for our managed services path. 

HyperShift is in parity with top-level add-on operators

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-8901 

Unblock HyperShift as a backend to managed services

HyperShift for managed services is a strategic company goal as it improves usability, feature, and cost competitiveness against other managed solutions, and because managed services/consumption-based cloud services is where we see the market growing (customers are looking to delegate platform overhead). 

 

We should make sure our SD milestones are unblocked by the core team. 

 

Note 

This feature reflects HyperShift core readiness to be consumed. When all related EPICs and stories in this EPIC are complete HyperShift can be considered ready to be consumed in GA form. This does not describe a date but rather the readiness of core HyperShift to be consumed in GA form NOT the GA itself.

- GA date for self-managed will be factoring in other inputs such as adoption, customer interest/commitment, and other factors. 
- GA dates for ROSA-HyperShift are on track, tracked in milestones M1-7 (have a look at https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-5771

Epic Goal*

The goal is to split client certificate trust chains from the global Hypershift root CA.

 
Why is this important? (mandatory)

This is important to:

  • assure a workload can be run on any kind of OCP flavor
  • reduce the blast radius in case of a sensitive material leak
  • separate trust to allow more granular control over client certificate authentication

 
Scenarios (mandatory) 

Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

  1. I would like to be able to run my workloads on any OpenShift-like platform.
    My workloads allow components to authenticate using client certificates based
    on a trust bundle that I am able to retrieve from the cluster.
  1. I don't want my users to have access to any CA bundle that would allow them
    to trust a random certificate from the cluster for client certificate authentication.

 
Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

Hypershift team needs to provide us with code reviews and merge the changes we are to deliver

Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

  • Development - OpenShift Auth, Hypershift
  • Documentation -OpenShift Auth Docs team
  • QE - OpenShift Auth QE
  • PX - I have no idea what PX is
  • Others - others

Acceptance Criteria (optional)

The serviceaccount CA bundle automatically injected to all pods cannot be used to authenticate any client certificate generated by the control-plane.

Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

Risk: there is a throbbing time pressure as this should be delivered before first stable Hypershift release

Done - Checklist (mandatory)

  • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
  • Documentation - Content development is complete.
  • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
  • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
  • Engineering Stories Merged
  • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
  • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

We plan to build Ironic Container Images using RHEL9 as base image in OCP 4.12

This is required because the ironic components have abandoned support for CentOS Stream 8 and Python 3.6/3.7 upstream during the most recent development cycle that will produce the stable Zed release, in favor of CentOS Stream 9 and Python 3.8/3.9

More info on RHEL8 to RHEL9 transition in OCP can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N8KyDY7KmgUYA9EOtDDQolebz0qi3nhT20IOn4D-xS4

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a SRE, I want hypershift operator to expose a metric when hosted control plane is ready. 

This should allow SRE to tune (or silence) alerts occurring while the hosted control plane is spinning up. 

 

 

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The Kube APIServer has a sidecar to output audit logs. We need similar sidecars for other APIServers that run on the control plane side. We also need to pass the same audit log policy that we pass to the KAS to these other API servers.

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Place holder epic to track spontaneous task which does not deserve its own epic.

DoD:

At the moment if the input etcd kms encryption (key and role) is invalid we fail transparently.

We should check that both key and role are compatible/operational for a given cluster and fail in a condition otherwise

AC:

We have connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs flag in konnectiviy socks5 proxy to dial directly to cloud providers without going through konnectivity.

This introduce another path for exception https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1722

We should consolidate both by keep using connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs until there's a reason to not.

 

AWS has a hard limit of 100 OIDC providers globally. 
Currently each HostedCluster created by e2e creates its own OIDC provider, which results in hitting the quota limit frequently and causing the tests to fail as a result.

 
DOD:
Only a single OIDC provider should be created and shared between all e2e HostedClusters. 

Once the HostedCluster and NodePool gets stopped using PausedUntil statement, the awsprivatelink controller will continue reconciling.

 

How to test this:

  • Deploy a private cluster
  • Put it in pause once deployed
  • Delete the AWSEndPointService and the Service from the HCP namespace
  • And wait for a reconciliation, the result it's that they should not be recreated
  • Unpause it and wait for recreation.

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem? 

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb  

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)   

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

Description of problem:
Pipelines Repository support is Tech Preview, this is shown when search for repositories or checking the details page.

But the tabbed pipelines tab (in admin and dev perspective doesn't show this). Also, the "Add Git Repository" form page doesn't mention this.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11 - 4.13 (master)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install OpenShift Pipelines operator
  2. Navigate to Pipelines > Repository tab
  3. Select Create > Repository

Actual results:
The Repository tab and the "Add Git Repository" form page doesn't show a Tech Preview badge.

Expected results:
The Repository tab and the "Add Git Repository" form page should show a Tech Preview badge.

Additional info:
Check how the Shipwright Builds show this Tech Preview badge for the tab.

Description of problem:

Container networking pods cannot access the host network pods on another node which caused some operators DEGRADED

$ oc get co
NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       True          True       63m     OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.jhou.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/healthz": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)...
baremetal                                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      68m     
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      78m     
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m     
console                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       False         False      30m     RouteHealthAvailable: failed to GET route (https://console-openshift-console.apps.jhou.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com): Get "https://console-openshift-console.apps.jhou.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       True          True       13m     EtcdMembersAvailable: 1 of 2 members are available, openshift-qe-048.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com is unhealthy
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      39m     
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         True       47m     The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: CanaryChecksSucceeding=False (CanaryChecksRepetitiveFailures: Canary route checks for the default ingress controller are failing)
insights                                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      56m     
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      50m     
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         True       60m     GarbageCollectorDegraded: error querying alerts: client_error: client error: 403
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      54m     
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m     
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      51m     
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
machine-config                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      29m     
marketplace                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
monitoring                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      38m     
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      30m     
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      56m     
openshift-samples                          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      43m     
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      43m     
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m     
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m


$ oc get pod -n openshift-ingress -o wide
NAME                              READY   STATUS    RESTARTS      AGE   IP                                  NODE                                       NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
router-default-58f6498646-gf6ns   1/1     Running   1 (79m ago)   93m   2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:5abc   openshift-qe-049.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
router-default-58f6498646-qjtbk   1/1     Running   1 (79m ago)   93m   2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:593c   openshift-qe-052.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>


$ oc get pod -n openshift-network-diagnostics -o wide
NAME                                    READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE    IP              NODE                                       NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
network-check-source-5f967d78bc-cfwz4   1/1     Running   0          103m   fd01:0:0:3::9   openshift-qe-052.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-52krv              1/1     Running   0          91m    fd01:0:0:4::3   openshift-qe-049.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-56q9q              1/1     Running   0          91m    fd01:0:0:3::5   openshift-qe-052.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-ggqsf              1/1     Running   0          103m   fd01:0:0:2::4   openshift-qe-048.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-xfrq4              1/1     Running   0          103m   fd01:0:0:1::3   openshift-qe-047.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-zrglr              1/1     Running   0          73m    fd01:0:0:6::4   openshift-qe-051.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-zwb4t              1/1     Running   0          91m    fd01:0:0:5::5   openshift-qe-053.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>

####Failed from containers pod on openshift-qe-053.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com to access ingress pods

$ oc rsh -n openshift-network-diagnostics network-check-target-zwb4t
sh-4.4$ curl https://[2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:5abc]:443 -k -I
^C
sh-4.4$ curl https://[2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:593c]:443 -k -I
^C

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy ipv6 disconnect single cluster
2. 
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

With "createFirewallRules: Enabled", after successful "create cluster" and then "destroy cluster", the created firewall-rules in the shared VPC are not deleted.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

$ ./openshift-install version
./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419
built from commit 9eb0224926982cdd6cae53b872326292133e532d
release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc
release architecture amd64

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. try IPI installation with "createFirewallRules: Enabled", which succeeded
2. try destroying the cluster, which succeeded
3. check firewall-rules in the shared VPC 

Actual results:

After destroying the cluster, its firewall-rules created by installer in the shared VPC are not deleted.

Expected results:

Those firewall-rules should be deleted during destroying the cluster.

Additional info:

$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules list --filter='network=installer-shared-vpc'
NAME                                NETWORK               DIRECTION  PRIORITY  ALLOW                                                    
                                                                                                 DENY  DISABLED
ci-op-xpn-ingress-common            installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:6443,tcp:22,tcp:80,tcp:443,icmp                      
                                                                                                       False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-health-checks     installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:6080,tcp:6443,tcp:226
24,tcp:32335                                                                                           False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-internal-network  installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     udp:4789,udp:6081,udp:500,udp:4500,esp,tcp:9000-9999,udp:
9000-9999,tcp:10250,tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:10257,tcp:10259,tcp:22623,tcp:2379-2380        FalseTo show all fields of the firewall, please show in JSON format: --format=json
To show all fields in table format, please see the examples in --help.
$ 
$ yq-3.3.0 r test2/install-config.yaml platform
gcp:
  projectID: openshift-qe  
  region: us-central1
  computeSubnet: installer-shared-vpc-subnet-2
  controlPlaneSubnet: installer-shared-vpc-subnet-1
  createFirewallRules: Enabled
  network: installer-shared-vpc
  networkProjectID: openshift-qe-shared-vpc
$ 
$ yq-3.3.0 r test2/install-config.yaml metadata
creationTimestamp: null
name: jiwei-1013-01
$ 
$ openshift-install create cluster --dir test2
INFO Credentials loaded from file "/home/fedora/.gcp/osServiceAccount.json"
INFO Consuming Install Config from target directory
INFO Creating infrastructure resources...
INFO Waiting up to 20m0s (until 4:06AM) for the Kubernetes API at https://api.jiwei-1013-01.qe.gcp.devcluster.openshift.com:6443...
INFO API v1.24.0+8c7c967 up
INFO Waiting up to 30m0s (until 4:20AM) for bootstrapping to complete...
INFO Destroying the bootstrap resources...
INFO Waiting up to 40m0s (until 4:42AM) for the cluster at https://api.jiwei-1013-01.qe.gcp.devcluster.openshift.com:6443 to initialize...
INFO Checking to see if there is a route at openshift-console/console...
INFO Install complete!
INFO To access the cluster as the system:admin user when using 'oc', run 'export KUBECONFIG=/home/fedora/test2/auth/kubeconfig'
INFO Access the OpenShift web-console here: https://console-openshift-console.apps.jiwei-1013-01.qe.gcp.devcluster.openshift.com
INFO Login to the console with user: "kubeadmin", and password: "wWPkc-8G2Lw-xe2Vw-DgWha"
INFO Time elapsed: 39m14s  
$ 
$ openshift-install destroy cluster --dir test2
INFO Credentials loaded from file "/home/fedora/.gcp/osServiceAccount.json"
INFO Stopped instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-b-pmg5z
INFO Stopped instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-a-csg2j
INFO Stopped instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-1
INFO Stopped instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-2
INFO Stopped instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-0
INFO Deleted 2 recordset(s) in zone qe
INFO Deleted 3 recordset(s) in zone jiwei-1013-01-464st-private-zone
INFO Deleted DNS zone jiwei-1013-01-464st-private-zone
INFO Deleted bucket jiwei-1013-01-464st-image-registry-us-central1-ulgxgjfqxbdnrhd
INFO Deleted instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-0
INFO Deleted instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-a-csg2j
INFO Deleted instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-1
INFO Deleted instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-b-pmg5z
INFO Deleted instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-2
INFO Deleted disk jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-2
INFO Deleted disk jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-1
INFO Deleted disk jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-b-pmg5z
INFO Deleted disk jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-0
INFO Deleted disk jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-a-csg2j
INFO Deleted address jiwei-1013-01-464st-cluster-public-ip
INFO Deleted address jiwei-1013-01-464st-cluster-ip
INFO Deleted forwarding rule a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91
INFO Deleted forwarding rule jiwei-1013-01-464st-api
INFO Deleted forwarding rule jiwei-1013-01-464st-api-internal
INFO Deleted target pool a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91
INFO Deleted target pool jiwei-1013-01-464st-api
INFO Deleted backend service jiwei-1013-01-464st-api-internal
INFO Deleted instance group jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-us-central1-a
INFO Deleted instance group jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-us-central1-c
INFO Deleted instance group jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-us-central1-b
INFO Deleted health check jiwei-1013-01-464st-api-internal
INFO Deleted HTTP health check a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91
INFO Deleted HTTP health check jiwei-1013-01-464st-api
INFO Time elapsed: 4m18s   
$ 
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules list --filter='network=installer-shared-vpc'
NAME                                          NETWORK               DIRECTION  PRIORITY  ALLOW                                                                                                                                                     DENY  DISABLED
ci-op-xpn-ingress-common                      installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:6443,tcp:22,tcp:80,tcp:443,icmp                                                                                                                             False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-health-checks               installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:6080,tcp:6443,tcp:22624,tcp:32335                                                                                           False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-internal-network            installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     udp:4789,udp:6081,udp:500,udp:4500,esp,tcp:9000-9999,udp:9000-9999,tcp:10250,tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:10257,tcp:10259,tcp:22623,tcp:2379-2380        False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-api                       installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:6443                                                                                                                                                        False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-control-plane             installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:22623,tcp:10257,tcp:10259                                                                                                                                   False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-etcd                      installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:2379-2380                                                                                                                                                   False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-health-checks             installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:6080,tcp:6443,tcp:22624                                                                                                                                     False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-cluster          installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:30000-32767,udp:9000-9999,udp:30000-32767,udp:4789,udp:6081,tcp:9000-9999,udp:500,udp:4500,esp,tcp:10250                                                    False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-network          installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      icmp,tcp:22                                                                                                                                                     False
k8s-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91-http-hc  installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:30268                                                                                                                                                       False
k8s-fw-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91       installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:80,tcp:443                                                                                                                                                  FalseTo show all fields of the firewall, please show in JSON format: --format=json
To show all fields in table format, please see the examples in --help.
$ 

FYI manually deleting those firewall-rules in the shared VPC does work.
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-api
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-api].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-control-plane
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-control-plane].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-etcd
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-etcd].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-health-checks
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-health-checks].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-cluster
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-cluster].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-network
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-network].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q k8s-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91-http-hc
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/k8s-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91-http-hc].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q k8s-fw-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/k8s-fw-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91].
$ 
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules list --filter='network=installer-shared-vpc'
NAME                                NETWORK               DIRECTION  PRIORITY  ALLOW                                                                                                                                                     DENY  DISABLED
ci-op-xpn-ingress-common            installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:6443,tcp:22,tcp:80,tcp:443,icmp                                                                                                                             False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-health-checks     installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:6080,tcp:6443,tcp:22624,tcp:32335                                                                                           False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-internal-network  installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     udp:4789,udp:6081,udp:500,udp:4500,esp,tcp:9000-9999,udp:9000-9999,tcp:10250,tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:10257,tcp:10259,tcp:22623,tcp:2379-2380        FalseTo show all fields of the firewall, please show in JSON format: --format=json
To show all fields in table format, please see the examples in --help.
$ 

 

 

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3032. The following is the description of the original issue:

If installation fails at an early stage (e.g. pulling release images, configuring hosts, waiting for agents to come up) there is no indication that anything has gone wrong, and the installer binary may not even be able to connect.
We should at least display what is happening on the console so that users have some avenue to figure out for themselves what is going on.

Description of problem:

Large OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24 - Cluster is failing to update router-certs secret in openshift-config-managed namespace as the given secret is too big.

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

The OpenShift Container Platform 4 - Cluster has 180 IngressController configured with endpointPublishingStrategy set to private.

Now the default certificate needs to be replaced but is not properly replicated to openshift-authentication namespace and potentially other location because of the problem mentioned (since the required secret can not be updated)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OpenShift Container Platform 4.10
2. Create 180 IngressController with specific certificates
3. Check openshift-ingress-operator logs to see how it fails to update/create the necessary secret in openshift-config-managed

Actual results:

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

Expected results:

No matter how many IngressController is created, secret management taken care by Operators need to work, even if data exceed 1 MB size limitation. In that case an approach needs to exist to split data into multiple secrets or handle it otherwise.

Additional info:

 

ovnkube-trace: ofproto/trace fails for IPv6

[akaris@linux go-controller (fix-ovnkube-trace-ipv6)]$ oc exec -ti ovn-trace-two -n ovn-tests-two -- ovnkube-trace -src-namespace ovn-tests-two -src ovn-trace-two -dst-ip 2404:6800:4003:c06::69 -tcp
I1021 12:16:56.478752    3356 ovs.go:90] Maximum command line arguments set to: 191102
ovn-trace from pod to IP indicates success from ovn-trace-two to 2404:6800:4003:c06::69
F1021 12:16:57.075803    3356 ovnkube-trace.go:601] ovs-appctl ofproto/trace pod to IP error command terminated with exit code 2 stdOut: 
 stdErr: Bad openflow flow syntax: in_port=73af56a18042ab9, tcp, dl_src=0a:58:17:2b:b6:42, dl_dst=0a:58:69:bd:ba:d8, nw_src=fd01:0:0:5::13, nw_dst=2404:6800:4003:c06::69, nw_ttl=64, tcp_dst=80, tcp_src=12345: bad value for nw_src (fd01:0:0:5::13: invalid IP address)
ovs-appctl: ovs-vswitchd: server returned an error
command terminated with exit code 1
[akaris@linux go-controller (fix-ovnkube-trace-ipv6)]$ oc exec -ti ovn-trace-two -n ovn-tests-two -- ovnkube-trace -src-namespace ovn-tests-two -src ovn-trace-two -dst-namespace ovn-tests -dst ovn-trace -udp
I1021 12:17:26.695325    3386 ovs.go:90] Maximum command line arguments set to: 191102
ovn-trace source pod to destination pod indicates success from ovn-trace-two to ovn-trace
ovn-trace destination pod to source pod indicates success from ovn-trace to ovn-trace-two
F1021 12:17:27.708822    3386 ovnkube-trace.go:601] ovs-appctl ofproto/trace source pod to destination pod error command terminated with exit code 2 stdOut: 
 stdErr: Bad openflow flow syntax: in_port=73af56a18042ab9, udp, dl_src=0a:58:17:2b:b6:42, dl_dst=0a:58:69:bd:ba:d8, nw_src=fd01:0:0:5::13, nw_dst=fd01:0:0:5::14, nw_ttl=64, udp_dst=80, udp_src=12345: bad value for nw_src (fd01:0:0:5::13: invalid IP address)
ovs-appctl: ovs-vswitchd: server returned an error
command terminated with exit code 1

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1428. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When using an OperatorGroup attached to a service account, AND if there is a secret present in the namespace, the operator installation will fail with the message:
the service account does not have any API secret sa=testx-ns/testx-sa
This issue seems similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094303 - which was resolved in 4.11.0 - however, the new element now, is that the presence of a secret in the namespace  is causing the issue.
The name of the secret seems significant - suggesting something somewhere is depending on the order that secrets are listed in. For example, If the secret in the namespace is called "asecret", the problem does not occur. If it is called "zsecret", the problem always occurs.
"zsecret" is not a "kubernetes.io/service-account-token". The issue I have raised here relates to Opaque secrets - zsecret is an Opaque secret. The issue may apply to other types of secrets, but specifically my issue is that when there is an opaque secret present in the namespace, the operator install fails as described. I aught to be allowed to have an opaque secret present in the namespace where I am installing the operator.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0 & 4.11.1

How reproducible:

100% reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create namespace: oc new-project testx-ns
2. oc apply -f api-secret-issue.yaml

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

API YAML:

cat api-secret-issue.yaml 
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
  name: zsecret
  namespace: testx-ns
  annotations:
   kubernetes.io/service-account.name: testx-sa
type: Opaque
stringData:
  mykey: mypass

apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
  name: testx-sa
  namespace: testx-ns

kind: OperatorGroup
apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1
metadata:
  name: testx-og
  namespace: testx-ns
spec:
  serviceAccountName: "testx-sa"
  targetNamespaces:
  - testx-ns

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
  name: testx-role
  namespace: testx-ns
rules:

  • apiGroups: ["*"]
      resources: ["*"]
      verbs: ["*"] 
      

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  name: testx-rolebinding
  namespace: testx-ns
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: Role
  name: testx-role
subjects:

  • kind: ServiceAccount
      name: testx-sa
      namespace: testx-ns

apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: Subscription
metadata:
  name: etcd-operator
  namespace: testx-ns
spec:
  channel: singlenamespace-alpha
  installPlanApproval: Automatic
  name: etcd
  source: community-operators
  sourceNamespace: openshift-marketplace

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4950. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

A PR bumping OLM's k8s dependencies to 1.25 wasn't merged into openshift 4.12

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openshift-4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Check OLM's repository for k8s dependencies in the 4.12 branch

Actual results:

Has 1.24 k8s dependencies

Expected results:

Has 1.25 k8s dependencies

Additional info:

 

 

Tracker bug for bootimage bump in 4.12. This bug should block bugs which need a bootimage bump to fix.

Description of problem: The product name for Azure Red Hat OpenShift was incorrect in Customer Case Management (CCM). As a result, the console included this incorrect product name in order for the support case link to correctly route. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CPCCM-9926 fixed the incorrect product name, so now the support case link for Azure needs to be updated to reflect the correct product name.

Description of problem:

There's argument number mismatch on release_vif() call while reverting
port association.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

It's clear in the code, no need to reproduce this.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

TypeError

Expected results:

KuryrPort released

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Image registry pods panic while deploying OCP in me-central-1 AWS region

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.2

How reproducible:

Deploy OCP in AWS me-central-1 region

Steps to Reproduce:

Deploy OCP in AWS me-central-1 region 

Actual results:

panic: Invalid region provided: me-central-1

Expected results:

Image registry pods should come up with no errors

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

On the alert details page and alerting rule details page, clicking on a field that has a popover help throws an uncaught JavaScript error.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Go to Observe > Alerting pages
2. Click on an alert (or go to the rules tab then click on a rule)
3. Click on one of the underlined fields (those that have a popover help)

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:
When the user selects Serverless as an import strategy and tried to import a Devfile, the import fails because of an invalid Deployment.

Could reproduce this already in 4.11, but its even more prominent in 4.12 when the console automatically selects the resource type serverless when the Serverless operator is installed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Works on 4.10
Failed on 4.11 and 4.12 master

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install and setup Serverless operator
1. Switch to dev perspective, navigate to add > import from git
3. Enter a non-Devfile git URL like https://github.com/jerolimov/nodeinfo
4. On 4.11 select resource type Serverless (on 4.12 this should be selected automatically)
5. Update the git URL to a repo with a Devfile like https://github.com/nodeshift-starters/devfile-sample
6. Press create

Actual results:
Import fails with error:

Error "Invalid value: "": name part must be non-empty" for field "spec.template.labels".

Expected results:
Devfile should be imported

Additional info:

OVS 2.17+ introduced an optimization of "weak references" to substantially speed up database snapshots. in some cases weak references may leak memory; to aforementioned commit fixes that and has been pulled into ovs2.17-62 and later.

Description of problem:

Since the decomissioning of the psi cluster, and subsequent move of the rhcos release browser, product builds machine-os-images builds have been failing. See e.g. https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=47565717

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12, 4.11, 4.10.

How reproducible:

Have ART build the image

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Have ART build the image

Actual results:

Build failure

Expected results:

Build succesful

Additional info:


This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11773. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

with new s3 bucket, hc failed with condition :
- lastTransitionTime: “2023-04-13T14:17:11Z”
   message: ‘failed to upload /.well-known/openid-configuration to the heli-hypershift-demo-oidc-2
    s3 bucket: aws returned an error: AccessControlListNotSupported’
   observedGeneration: 3
   reason: OIDCConfigurationInvalid
   status: “False”
   type: ValidOIDCConfiguration

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

1 create s3 bucket 
$ aws s3api create-bucket --create-bucket-configuration  LocationConstraint=us-east-2 --region=us-east-2 --bucket heli-hypershift-demo-oidc-2
{
  "Location": "http://heli-hypershift-demo-oidc-2.s3.amazonaws.com/"
}
[cloud-user@heli-rhel-8 ~]$ aws s3api delete-public-access-block --bucket heli-hypershift-demo-oidc-2

2 install HO and create a hc on aws us-west-2
3. hc failed with condition:
- lastTransitionTime: “2023-04-13T14:17:11Z”    message: ‘failed to upload /.well-known/openid-configuration to the heli-hypershift-demo-oidc-2     s3 bucket: aws returned an error: AccessControlListNotSupported’    observedGeneration: 3    reason: OIDCConfigurationInvalid    status: “False”    type: ValidOIDCConfiguration

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

create a hc successfully

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5547. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
This is a follow-up on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 and https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390

When creating a Knative Service and delete it again with enabled option "Delete other resources created by console" (only available on 4.13+ with the PR above) the secret "$name-github-webhook-secret" is not deleted.

When the user tries to create the same Knative Service again this fails with an error:

An error occurred
secrets "nodeinfo-github-webhook-secret" already exists

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.13

(we might want to backport this together with https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390 and OCPBUGS-5548)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install OpenShift Serverless operator (tested with 1.26.0)
  2. Create a new project
  3. Navigate to Add > Import from git and create an application
  4. In the topology select the Knative Service > "Delete Service" (not Delete App)

Actual results:
Deleted resources:

  1. Knative Service (tries it twice!) $name
  2. ImageStream $name
  3. BuildConfig $name
  4. Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret

Expected results:
Should also remove this resource

  1. Delete Knative Service should be called just once
  2. Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

Additional info:
When delete the whole application all the resources are deleted correctly (and just once)!

  1. Knative Service (just once!) $name
  2. ImageStream $name
  3. BuildConfig $name
  4. Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret
  5. Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3524. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Install fully private cluster on Azure against 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-10-033725, sa for coreOS image have public access.

$ az storage account list -g jima-azure-11a-f58lp-rg --query "[].[name,allowBlobPublicAccess]" -o tsv
clusterptkpx    True
imageregistryjimaazrsgcc    False

same profile on 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-11-10-202051, sa for coreos image are not publicly accessible.

$ az storage account list -g jima-azure-11c-kf9hw-rg --query "[].[name,allowBlobPublicAccess]" -o tsv
clusterr8wv9    False
imageregistryjimaaz9btdx    False 

Checked that terraform-provider-azurerm version is different between 4.11 and 4.12.

4.11: v2.98.0

4.12: v3.19.1

In terraform-provider-azurerm v2.98.0, it use property allow_blob_public_access to manage sa public access, the default value is false.

In  terraform-provider-azurerm v3.19.1, property allow_blob_public_access is renamed to allow_nested_items_to_be_public , the default value is true. 

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#300-march-24-2022

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-10-033725

How reproducible:

always on 4.12

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install fully private cluster on azure against 4.12 payload
2. 
3.

Actual results:

sa for coreos image is publicly accessible

Expected results:

sa for coreos image should not be publicly accessible

Additional info:

only happened on 4.12

 

 

I haven't gone back to pin down all affected versions, but I wouldn't be surprised if we've had this exposure for a while. On a 4.12.0-ec.2 cluster, we have:

cluster:usage:resources:sum{resource="podnetworkconnectivitychecks.controlplane.operator.openshift.io"}

currently clocking in around 67983. I've gathered a dump with:

$ oc --as system:admin -n openshift-network-diagnostics get podnetworkconnectivitychecks.controlplane.operator.openshift.io | gzip >checks.gz

And many, many of these reference nodes which no longer exist (the cluster is aggressively autoscaled, with nodes coming and going all the time). We should fix garbage collection on this resource, to avoid consuming excessive amounts of memory in the Kube API server and etcd as they attempt to list the large resource set.

Description of problem:

failed even trying to "create install-config" in the epic's scenario

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

$ ./openshift-install version
./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419
built from commit 9eb0224926982cdd6cae53b872326292133e532d
release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc
release architecture amd64

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create vpc network, subnets, and a firewall-rule to allow ssh access to the bastion host
2. create the bastion host, with setting a valid service-account and scopes of "https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-platform"
3. scp pull secret to the bastion host
4. ssh to the bastion host (subsequent steps would be on the bastion host, except told explicitly)
5. get "oc", e.g. curl https://mirror2.openshift.com/pub/openshift-v4/clients/ocp/4.9.9/openshift-client-linux-4.9.9.tar.gz -o openshift-client-linux-4.9.9.tar.gz; tar zxvf openshift-client-linux-4.9.9.tar.gz
6. obtain the installation program
7. try "create install-config" of platform "gcp" 

Actual results:

[cloud-user@jiwei-0930-02-rhel8-mirror ~]$ ./openshift-install create install-config --dir work                                         
? SSH Public Key /home/cloud-user/.ssh/id_rsa.pub                                                                                       
? Platform gcp                                                                                                                          
INFO Credentials loaded from gcloud CLI defaults                                                                                        
? Project ID OpenShift QE Shared VPC (openshift-qe-shared-vpc)                                                                          
? Region us-west1                                                                                                                       
? Base Domain qe-shared-vpc.qe.gcp.devcluster.openshift.com                                                                             
? Cluster Name jiwei-0930-03                                                                                                            
? Pull Secret [? for help] ******
FATAL failed to fetch Install Config: failed to generate asset "Install Config": credentialsMode: Forbidden: environmental authentication is only supported with Manual credentials mode 
[cloud-user@jiwei-0930-02-rhel8-mirror ~]$ 

Expected results:

"create install-config" should succeed.

Additional info:

 

 

 

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3621. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

EUS-to-EUS upgrade(4.10.38-4.11.13-4.12.0-rc.0), after control-plane nodes are upgraded to 4.12 successfully, unpause the worker pool to get worker nodes updated. But worker nodes failed to be updated with degraded worker pool:
```
# ./oc get node
NAME                                                   STATUS                     ROLES    AGE     VERSION
jliu410-6hmkz-master-0.c.openshift-qe.internal         Ready                      master   4h40m   v1.25.2+f33d98e
jliu410-6hmkz-master-1.c.openshift-qe.internal         Ready                      master   4h40m   v1.25.2+f33d98e
jliu410-6hmkz-master-2.c.openshift-qe.internal         Ready                      master   4h40m   v1.25.2+f33d98e
jliu410-6hmkz-worker-a-xdwvv.c.openshift-qe.internal   Ready,SchedulingDisabled   worker   4h31m   v1.23.12+6b34f32
jliu410-6hmkz-worker-b-9hnb8.c.openshift-qe.internal   Ready                      worker   4h31m   v1.23.12+6b34f32
jliu410-6hmkz-worker-c-bdv4f.c.openshift-qe.internal   Ready                      worker   4h31m   v1.23.12+6b34f32
...
# ./oc get co machine-config
machine-config   4.12.0-rc.0   True        False         True       3h41m   Failed to resync 4.12.0-rc.0 because: error during syncRequiredMachineConfigPools: [timed out waiting for the condition, error pool worker is not ready, retrying. Status: (pool degraded: true total: 3, ready 0, updated: 0, unavailable: 1)]
...
# ./oc get mcp
NAME     CONFIG                                             UPDATED   UPDATING   DEGRADED   MACHINECOUNT   READYMACHINECOUNT   UPDATEDMACHINECOUNT   DEGRADEDMACHINECOUNT   AGE
master   rendered-master-b81233204496767f2fe32fbb6cb088e1   True      False      False      3              3                   3                     0                      4h10m
worker   rendered-worker-a2caae543a144d94c17a27e56038d4c4   False     True       True       3              0                   0                     1                      4h10m
...
# ./oc describe mcp worker
Message:                   Reason:                    Status:                True    Type:                  Degraded    Last Transition Time:  2022-11-14T07:19:42Z    Message:               Node jliu410-6hmkz-worker-a-xdwvv.c.openshift-qe.internal is reporting: "Error checking type of update image: error running skopeo inspect --no-tags --retry-times 5 --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json docker://quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:c01b0ae9870dbee5609c52b4d649334ce6854fff1237f1521929d151f6876daa: exit status 1\ntime=\"2022-11-14T07:42:47Z\" level=fatal msg=\"unknown flag: --no-tags\"\n"    Reason:                1 nodes are reporting degraded status on sync    Status:                True    Type:                  NodeDegraded
...
# ./oc logs machine-config-daemon-mg2zn
E1114 08:11:27.115577  192836 writer.go:200] Marking Degraded due to: Error checking type of update image: error running skopeo inspect --no-tags --retry-times 5 --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json docker://quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:c01b0ae9870dbee5609c52b4d649334ce6854fff1237f1521929d151f6876daa: exit status 1
time="2022-11-14T08:11:25Z" level=fatal msg="unknown flag: --no-tags"
```

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-rc.0

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. EUS upgrade with path 4.10.38-> 4.11.13-> 4.12.0-rc.0 with paused worker pool 
2. After master pool upgrade succeed, unpause worker pool 
3.

Actual results:

Worker pool upgrade failed

Expected results:

Worker pool upgrade succeed

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

acquiring node lock for assigning ip address, node: %s, ip: %sci-ln-g470i52-1d09d-slz7m-worker-westus-6wt7k10.0.128.102

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7555. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Enable default sysctls for kubelet.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3114. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When running a Hosted Cluster on Hypershift the cluster-networking-operator never progressed to Available despite all the components being up and running

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.11.11-x86_64 for the hosted clusters
hypershift operator is quay.io/hypershift/hypershift-operator:4.11
4.11.9 management cluster

How reproducible:

Happened once

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

oc get co network reports False availability

Expected results:

oc get co network reports True availability

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Automatic ART PRs to update the build config are failing. Needs manual intervention.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5287. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/THREESCALE-9015.  A problem with the Red Hat Integration - 3scale - Managed Application Services operator prevents it from installing correctly, which results in the failure of operator-install-single-namespace.spec.ts integration test.

Description of problem:

cluster-version-operator pod crashloop during the bootstrap process might be leading to a longer bootstrap process causing the installer to timeout and fail.

The cluster-version-operator pod is continuously restarting due to a go panic. The bootstrap process fails due to the timeout although it completes the process correctly after more time, once the cluster-version-operator pod runs correctly.

$ oc -n openshift-cluster-version logs -p cluster-version-operator-754498df8b-5gll8
I0919 10:25:05.790124       1 start.go:23] ClusterVersionOperator 4.12.0-202209161347.p0.gc4fd1f4.assembly.stream-c4fd1f4                                                                                                                    
F0919 10:25:05.791580       1 start.go:29] error: Get "https://127.0.0.1:6443/apis/config.openshift.io/v1/featuregates/cluster": dial tcp 127.0.0.1:6443: connect: connection refused                                                        
goroutine 1 [running]:
k8s.io/klog/v2.stacks(0x1)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:860 +0x8a
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).output(0x2bee180, 0x3, 0x0, 0xc00017d5e0, 0x1, {0x22e9abc?, 0x1?}, 0x2beed80?, 0x0)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:825 +0x686
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).printfDepth(0x2bee180, 0x0?, 0x0, {0x0, 0x0}, 0x1?, {0x1b9cff0, 0x9}, {0xc000089140, 0x1, ...})                                                                                                                   
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:630 +0x1f2
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).printf(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:612
k8s.io/klog/v2.Fatalf(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:1516
main.init.3.func1(0xc00012ac80?, {0x1b96f60?, 0x6?, 0x6?})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/cmd/start.go:29 +0x1e6
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc00012ac80, {0xc0002fea20, 0x6, 0x6})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:860 +0x663
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0x2bd52a0)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:974 +0x3b4
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:902
main.main()
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/cmd/main.go:29 +0x46

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-18-234318

How reproducible:

Most of the times, with any network type and installation type (IPI, UPI and proxy).

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP 4.12 IPI
   $ openshift-install create cluster
2. Wait until bootstrap is completed

Actual results:

[...]
level=error msg="Bootstrap failed to complete: timed out waiting for the condition"
level=error msg="Failed to wait for bootstrapping to complete. This error usually happens when there is a problem with control plane hosts that prevents the control plane operators from creating the control plane."
NAMESPACE                                          NAME                                                         READY   STATUS             RESTARTS        AGE 
openshift-cluster-version                          cluster-version-operator-754498df8b-5gll8                    0/1     CrashLoopBackOff   7 (3m21s ago)   24m 
openshift-image-registry                           image-registry-94fd8b75c-djbxb                               0/1     Pending            0               6m44s 
openshift-image-registry                           image-registry-94fd8b75c-ft66c                               0/1     Pending            0               6m44s 
openshift-ingress                                  router-default-64fbb749b4-cmqgw                              0/1     Pending            0               13m   
openshift-ingress                                  router-default-64fbb749b4-mhtqx                              0/1     Pending            0               13m   
openshift-monitoring                               prometheus-operator-admission-webhook-6d8cb95cf7-6jn5q       0/1     Pending            0               14m 
openshift-monitoring                               prometheus-operator-admission-webhook-6d8cb95cf7-r6nnk       0/1     Pending            0               14m 
openshift-network-diagnostics                      network-check-source-8758bd6fc-vzf5k                         0/1     Pending            0               18m 
openshift-operator-lifecycle-manager               collect-profiles-27726375-hlq89                              0/1     Pending            0               21m 
$ oc -n openshift-cluster-version describe pod cluster-version-operator-754498df8b-5gll8
Name:                 cluster-version-operator-754498df8b-5gll8
Namespace:            openshift-cluster-version                                                            
Priority:             2000000000              
Priority Class Name:  system-cluster-critical                                                       
Node:                 ostest-4gtwr-master-1/10.196.0.68
Start Time:           Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:17:41 +0000                       
Labels:               k8s-app=cluster-version-operator
                      pod-template-hash=754498df8b
Annotations:          openshift.io/scc: hostaccess 
Status:               Running                      
IP:                   10.196.0.68
IPs:                 
  IP:           10.196.0.68
Controlled By:  ReplicaSet/cluster-version-operator-754498df8b
Containers:        
  cluster-version-operator:
    Container ID:  cri-o://1e2879600c89baabaca68c1d4d0a563d4b664c507f0617988cbf9ea7437f0b27
    Image:         registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2e38cd73b402a990286829aebdf00aa67a5b99124c61ec2f4fccd1135a1f0c69                                                                                                             
    Image ID:      registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2e38cd73b402a990286829aebdf00aa67a5b99124c61ec2f4fccd1135a1f0c69
    Port:          <none>                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
    Host Port:     <none>                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
    Args:                                                     
      start                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
      --release-image=registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2e38cd73b402a990286829aebdf00aa67a5b99124c61ec2f4fccd1135a1f0c69                                                                                                          
      --enable-auto-update=false                                                                                                                                                                                                             
      --listen=0.0.0.0:9099                                                  
      --serving-cert-file=/etc/tls/serving-cert/tls.crt
      --serving-key-file=/etc/tls/serving-cert/tls.key                                                                                                                                                                                       
      --v=2             
    State:       Waiting 
      Reason:    CrashLoopBackOff
    Last State:  Terminated
      Reason:    Error
      Message:   I0919 10:33:07.798614       1 start.go:23] ClusterVersionOperator 4.12.0-202209161347.p0.gc4fd1f4.assembly.stream-c4fd1f4
F0919 10:33:07.800115       1 start.go:29] error: Get "https://127.0.0.1:6443/apis/config.openshift.io/v1/featuregates/cluster": dial tcp 127.0.0.1:6443: connect: connection refused
goroutine 1 [running]:                                                                                                                                                                                                                [43/497]
k8s.io/klog/v2.stacks(0x1)
  /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:860 +0x8a
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).output(0x2bee180, 0x3, 0x0, 0xc000433ea0, 0x1, {0x22e9abc?, 0x1?}, 0x2beed80?, 0x0)
  /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:825 +0x686
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).printfDepth(0x2bee180, 0x0?, 0x0, {0x0, 0x0}, 0x1?, {0x1b9cff0, 0x9}, {0xc0002d6630, 0x1, ...})
  /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:630 +0x1f2
k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).printf(...)
  /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:612
k8s.io/klog/v2.Fatalf(...)
  /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:1516
main.init.3.func1(0xc0003b4f00?, {0x1b96f60?, 0x6?, 0x6?})
  /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/cmd/start.go:29 +0x1e6
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc0003b4f00, {0xc000311980, 0x6, 0x6})
  /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:860 +0x663
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0x2bd52a0)
  /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:974 +0x3b4
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
  /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:902
main.main()
  /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/cmd/main.go:29 +0x46      Exit Code:    255
      Started:      Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:33:07 +0000
      Finished:     Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:33:07 +0000
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  7
    Requests:
      cpu:     20m
      memory:  50Mi
    Environment:
      KUBERNETES_SERVICE_PORT:  6443
      KUBERNETES_SERVICE_HOST:  127.0.0.1
      NODE_NAME:                 (v1:spec.nodeName)
      CLUSTER_PROFILE:          self-managed-high-availability
    Mounts:
      /etc/cvo/updatepayloads from etc-cvo-updatepayloads (ro)
      /etc/ssl/certs from etc-ssl-certs (ro)
      /etc/tls/service-ca from service-ca (ro)
      /etc/tls/serving-cert from serving-cert (ro)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access (ro)
onditions:
  Type              Status
  Initialized       True
  Ready             False
  ContainersReady   False
  PodScheduled      True
Volumes:
  etc-ssl-certs:
    Type:          HostPath (bare host directory volume)
    Path:          /etc/ssl/certs
    HostPathType:
  etc-cvo-updatepayloads:
    Type:          HostPath (bare host directory volume)
    Path:          /etc/cvo/updatepayloads
    HostPathType:
  serving-cert:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  cluster-version-operator-serving-cert
    Optional:    false
  service-ca:
    Type:      ConfigMap (a volume populated by a ConfigMap)
    Name:      openshift-service-ca.crt
    Optional:  false
  kube-api-access:
    Type:                    Projected (a volume that contains injected data from multiple sources)
    TokenExpirationSeconds:  3600
    ConfigMapName:           kube-root-ca.crt
    ConfigMapOptional:       <nil>
    DownwardAPI:             true
QoS Class:                   Burstable
Node-Selectors:              node-role.kubernetes.io/master=
Tolerations:                 node-role.kubernetes.io/master:NoSchedule op=Exists
                             node.kubernetes.io/memory-pressure:NoSchedule op=Exists
                             node.kubernetes.io/network-unavailable:NoSchedule op=Exists
                             node.kubernetes.io/not-ready:NoSchedule op=Exists
                             node.kubernetes.io/not-ready:NoExecute op=Exists for 120s
                             node.kubernetes.io/unreachable:NoExecute op=Exists for 120s
Events:
  Type     Reason            Age                   From               Message
  ----     ------            ----                  ----               -------
  Warning  FailedScheduling  25m                   default-scheduler  no nodes available to schedule pods
  Warning  FailedScheduling  21m                   default-scheduler  0/2 nodes are available: 2 node(s) had untolerated taint {node.cloudprovider.kubernetes.io/uninitialized: true}. preemption: 0/2 nodes are available: 2 Preemption is no
t helpful for scheduling.
  Normal   Scheduled         19m                   default-scheduler  Successfully assigned openshift-cluster-version/cluster-version-operator-754498df8b-5gll8 to ostest-4gtwr-master-1 by ostest-4gtwr-bootstrap
  Warning  FailedMount       17m                   kubelet            Unable to attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[serving-cert], unattached volumes=[service-ca kube-api-access etc-ssl-certs etc-cvo-updatepayloads serving-cert]:
timed out waiting for the condition
  Warning  FailedMount       17m (x9 over 19m)     kubelet            MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "serving-cert" : secret "cluster-version-operator-serving-cert" not found
  Normal   Pulling           15m                   kubelet            Pulling image "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2e38cd73b402a990286829aebdf00aa67a5b99124c61ec2f4fccd1135a1f0c69"
  Normal   Pulled            15m                   kubelet            Successfully pulled image "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2e38cd73b402a990286829aebdf00aa67a5b99124c61ec2f4fccd1135a1f0c69" in 7.481824271s
  Normal   Started           14m (x3 over 15m)     kubelet            Started container cluster-version-operator
  Normal   Created           14m (x4 over 15m)     kubelet            Created container cluster-version-operator
  Normal   Pulled            14m (x3 over 15m)     kubelet            Container image "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2e38cd73b402a990286829aebdf00aa67a5b99124c61ec2f4fccd1135a1f0c69" already present on machine
  Warning  BackOff           4m22s (x52 over 15m)  kubelet            Back-off restarting failed container
  
  

Expected results:

No panic?

Additional info:

Seen in most of OCP on OSP QE CI jobs.

Attached [^must-gather-install.tar.gz]

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2050230](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050230). The following is the description of the original bug:

Description of problem:
In a large cluster, sdn daemonset can DoS the kube-apiserver with un-paginated LIST calls on high count resources.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
NA

Steps to Reproduce:
NA

Actual results:
Kube API Server and Openshift API Server in one of the cluster keeps restarting, without proper exception. The cluster is not accessible.

Expected results:
Kube API Server and Openshift API Server should be stable.

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7719. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

An update from 4.13.0-ec.2 to 4.13.0-ec.3 stuck on:

$ oc get clusteroperator machine-config
NAME             VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
machine-config   4.13.0-ec.2   True        True          True       30h     Unable to apply 4.13.0-ec.3: error during syncRequiredMachineConfigPools: [timed out waiting for the condition, error pool worker is not ready, retrying. Status: (pool degraded: true total: 105, ready 105, updated: 105, unavailable: 0)]

The worker MachineConfigPool status included:

Unable to find source-code formatter for language: node. Available languages are: actionscript, ada, applescript, bash, c, c#, c++, cpp, css, erlang, go, groovy, haskell, html, java, javascript, js, json, lua, none, nyan, objc, perl, php, python, r, rainbow, ruby, scala, sh, sql, swift, visualbasic, xml, yaml
      type: NodeDegraded
    - lastTransitionTime: "2023-02-16T14:29:21Z"
      message: 'Failed to render configuration for pool worker: Ignoring MC 99-worker-generated-containerruntime
        generated by older version 8276d9c1f574481043d3661a1ace1f36cd8c3b62 (my version:
        c06601510c0917a48912cc2dda095d8414cc5182)'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13.0-ec.3. The behavior was apparently introduced as part of OCPBUGS-6018, which has been backported, so the following update targets are expected to be vulnerable: 4.10.52+, 4.11.26+, 4.12.2+, and 4.13.0-ec.3.

How reproducible:

100%, when updating into a vulnerable release, if you happen to have leaked MachineConfig.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. 4.12.0-ec.1 dropped cleanUpDuplicatedMC. Run a later release, like 4.13.0-ec.2.
2. Create more than one KubeletConfig or ContainerRuntimeConfig targeting the worker pool (or any pool other than master). The number of clusters who have had redundant configuration objects like this is expected to be small.
3. (Optionally?) delete the extra KubeletConfig and ContainerRuntimeConfig.
4. Update to 4.13.0-ec.3.

Actual results:

Update sticks on the machine-config ClusterOperator, as described above.

Expected results:

Update completes without issues.

Description of problem
`oc-mirror` will hit error when use docker without namespace for OCI format mirror

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
Copy the operator image with OCI format to localhost;
cat copy.yaml
apiVersion: mirror.openshift.io/v1alpha2
kind: ImageSetConfiguration
mirror:
operators:

  • catalog: registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index:v4.11
    packages:
  • name: multicluster-engine
    minVersion: '2.1.1'
    maxVersion: '2.1.2'
    `oc-mirror --config copy.yaml oci:///home/ocmirrortest/noo --use-oci-feature --oci-feature-action=copy --continue-on-error`
    Mirror the operator image with OCI format to registry without namespace :
    cat mirror.yaml
    apiVersion: mirror.openshift.io/v1alpha2
    kind: ImageSetConfiguration
    mirror:
    operators:
  • catalog: oci:///home/ocmirrortest/noo/redhat-operator-index
    packages:
  • name: multicluster-engine
    minVersion: '2.1.1'
    maxVersion: '2.1.2'

`oc-mirror --config mirror.yaml --use-oci-feature --oci-feature-action=mirror --dest-skip-tls docker://localhost:5000`

Actual results:
2. Hit error:
`oc-mirror --config mirror.yaml --use-oci-feature --oci-feature-action=mirror --dest-skip-tls docker://localhost:5000`
……
info: Mirroring completed in 30ms (0B/s)
error: mirroring images "localhost:5000//multicluster-engine/mce-operator-bundle@sha256:e7519948bbcd521390d871ccd1489a49aa01d4de4c93c0b6972dfc61c92e0ca2" is not a valid image reference: invalid reference format

Expected results:
2. No error

Additional info:
`oc-mirror --config mirror.yaml --use-oci-feature --oci-feature-action=mirror --dest-skip-tls docker://localhost:5000/ocmir` works well.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4941. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem: This is a follow-up to OCPBUGS-3933.

The installer fails to destroy the cluster when the OpenStack object storage omits 'content-type' from responses, and a container is empty.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.8.z

How reproducible:

Likely not happening in customer environments where Swift is exposed directly. We're seeing the issue in our CI where we're using a non-RHOSP managed cloud.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6011. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The 4.12.0 openshift-client package has kubectl 1.24.1 bundled in it when it should have 1.25.x 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0

How reproducible:

Very

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Download and unpack https://mirror.openshift.com/pub/openshift-v4/x86_64/clients/ocp/stable/openshift-client-linux-4.12.0.tar.gz 
2. ./kubectl version

Actual results:

# ./kubectl version

Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"24", GitVersion:"v1.24.1", GitCommit:"1928ac4250660378a7d8c3430478dfe77977cb2a", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2022-12-07T05:08:22Z", GoVersion:"go1.18.7", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
Kustomize Version: v4.5.4

Expected results:

kubectl version 1.25.x 

Additional info:

 

While backporting to 4.12 the node healthz server (#1570), a number of functions related to checking stale ovs ports (checkForStaleOVSInternalPortscheckForStaleOVSRepresentorInterfacescheckForStaleOVSInterfaces) were moved to pkg/node/openflow_manager.go and their related tests were left in pkg/node/healthcheck_test.go. In 4.13, we have everything under pkg/network-controller-manager. To keep consistency, let's move these to pkg/node/node.go and pkg/node/node_test.go

Description of problem:

When the Insights operator is marked as disabled then the "Available" operator condition is updated every 2 mins. This is not desired and gives an impression that the operator is restarted every 2 mins 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

No extra steps needed, just watch "oc get co insights --watch"

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

available condition transition time updated every 2 min

Expected results:

available condition is updated only when its status changed

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7102. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/7ec6b948a148171bd336750fed98818890136429/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/plugins/downstream_csv_namespace_labeler_plugin_test.go#L309

has a dependency on creation of a next-version release branch.

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. clone operator-framework/operator-framework-olm
2. make unit/olm
3. deal with a really bumpy first-time kubebuilder/envtest install experience
4. profit

 

 

Actual results:

error

Expected results:

pass

Additional info:

 

 

The test results in sippy look really bad on our less common platforms, but still pretty unacceptable even on core clouds. It's reasonably often the only test that fails. We need to decide what to do here, and we're going to need input from the etcd team.

As of Sep 13th:

  • several vsphere and openstack variant combo's fail this test around 24-32% of the time
  • aws, amd64, ovn, upgrade, upgrade-micro, ha - fails 6% of the time
  • aws, amd64, ovn, upgrade, upgrade-minor, ha - fails 4% of the time
  • gcp, amd64, sdn, upgrade, upgrade-minor, ha - fails 8% of the time
  • globally across all jobs fails around 3% of the time.

Even on some major variant combos, a 4-8% failure rate is too high.
On Sep 13 arch call (no etcd present), Damien mentioned this might be an upstream alert that just isn't well suited for OpenShift's use cases, is this the case and it needs tuning?

Has the problem been getting worse?

I believe this link https://datastudio.google.com/s/urkKwmmzvgo indicates that this may be the case for 4.12, AWS and Azure are both getting worse in ways that I don't see if we change the release to 4.11 where it looks consistent. gcp seems fine on 4.12. We do not have data for vsphere for some reason.

This link shows the grpc_methods most commonly involved: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=etcdGRPCRequestsSlow+was+at+or+above&maxAge=48h&context=7&type=junit&name=&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

At a glance: LeaseGrant, MemberList, Txn, Status, Range.

Broken out of TRT-401
For linking with sippy:
[bz-etcd][invariant] alert/etcdGRPCRequestsSlow should not be at or above info
[sig-arch][bz-etcd][Late] Alerts alert/etcdGRPCRequestsSlow should not be at or above info [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

 

Description of problem:

node_exporter collects network metrics for "virtual" interfaces like br-*. When OVN is used, it also reports metrics for ovs-*, ovn, and genev_sys_* interfaces.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12 (and before)

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Launch a 4.12 cluster.
2. Run the following PromQL query: "group by(device) (node_network_info)"
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Only real host interfaces should be present.

Additional info:


Description of problem:
ovnkube-trace fails on hypershift deployments:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066891#c8

getDatabaseURIs looks for pods with container ovnkube-master, and those don't exist in hypershift.

https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/blob/6b8acf05cb6043ebdc42d9d36e700390baabea4a/go-controller/cmd/ovnkube-trace/ovnkube-trace.go#L540
~~~
// Returns nbAddress, sbAddress, protocol == "ssl", nil
func getDatabaseURIs(coreclient *corev1client.CoreV1Client, restconfig *rest.Config, ovnNamespace string) (string, string, bool, error) {
containerName := "ovnkube-master"
var err error

found := false
var podName string

listOptions := metav1.ListOptions{}
pods, err := coreclient.Pods(ovnNamespace).List(context.TODO(), listOptions)
if err != nil

{ return "", "", false, err }

for _, pod := range pods.Items {
for _, container := range pod.Spec.Containers {
if container.Name == containerName

{ found = true podName = pod.Name break }

}
}
if !found

{ klog.V(5).Infof("Cannot find ovnkube pods with container %s", containerName) return "", "", false, fmt.Errorf("cannot find ovnkube pods with container: %s", containerName) }

~~~

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Probably for: 1h or some such; I don't think it needs to go off immediately. But in-cluster admins and folks monitoring submitted Insights should have a way to figure out that the cluster is trying and failing to submit Telemetry. The alert should not fire when Telemetry submission has been explicitly disabled.

There is an existing alert for PrometheusRemoteWriteBehind in a similar space, but as of today, the Temeletry submissions are happening via telemeter-client, due to concerns about the load of submitting via remote-write.

We added server groups for control plane and computes as part of OSASINFRA-2570, except for UPI that only creates server group for the control plane.

We need to update the UPI scripts to create server group for computes to be consistent with IPI and have the instruction at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-machineset-osp.html work out of the box in case customers want to create MachineSets on their UPI clusters.

Related to OCPCLOUD-1135.

Description of problem:

egressip healthcheck through GRPC on dualstack cluster only uses v6 address when it trying to re-connect to egressIP node

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-04-081353

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. on dualstack OVN cluster, label one node to be egressip assignable
2. check leader ovnkube-master pod's log for egressip health check messages
3. set iptable to drop tcp port 9107 on the egress node, check leader ovnkube-master pod's log again

$  oc -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes logs ovnkube-master-s8gl4  -c ovnkube-master | grep health
I1004 17:10:13.752545       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to master-01.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:13.754308       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to master-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.128.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:13.757856       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:13.760742       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-02.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.131.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:13.763491       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to master-02.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.130.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:13.766653       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-01.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.128.2.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749573       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749624       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-01.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.128.2.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749635       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with master-01.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749645       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with master-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.128.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749654       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-02.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.131.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749663       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with master-02.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.130.0.2:9107)
I1004 18:21:13.753154       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
I1004 18:21:19.749592       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
W1004 18:21:24.750727       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:29.750396       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:34.749900       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:39.750830       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:44.750599       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:49.750640       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:54.749998       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:59.750512       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:04.749911       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:09.750500       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:14.750400       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:19.750448       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:24.749497       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:29.750366       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
I1004 18:24:03.020413       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
I1004 18:24:09.750273       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
W1004 18:24:14.749580       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:19.750138       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:24.750291       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:29.750526       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:34.750725       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:39.750496       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:44.750182       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:49.750172       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:54.749791       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:59.749548       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:25:04.750806       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:25:09.750666       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:25:14.750602       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:25:19.750717       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
I1004 18:28:58.561054       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
I1004 18:29:04.749940       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
W1004 18:29:09.749710       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:29:14.749689       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
 

Actual results:

uses v6 mgmtIP address to try to reconnect

Expected results:

Should use both v4 and v6 address to try to reconnect

Additional info:

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-501. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem: 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.16

How reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Edit the apiserver resource and add spec.audit.customRules field

$ oc get apiserver cluster -o yaml
spec:
audit:
customRules:

  • group: system:authenticated:oauth
    profile: AllRequestBodies
  • group: system:authenticated
    profile: AllRequestBodies
    profile: Default

2. Allow the kube-apiserver pods to rollout new revision.
3. Once the kube-apiserver pods are in new revision execute $ oc get dc

Actual results:

Error from server (InternalError): an error on the server ("This request caused apiserver to panic. Look in the logs for details.") has prevented the request from succeeding (get deploymentconfigs.apps.openshift.io)

Expected results: The command "oc get dc" should display the deploymentconfig without any error.

Additional info:

 A related slack thread: here

The error:

 which: no kustomize in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/local/go/bin:/go/bin)
+ curl -L --retry 5 https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/releases/download/kustomize%2Fv4.3.0/kustomize_v4.3.0_linux_amd64.tar.gz
+ tar -zx -C /usr/bin/
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed

  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
100  1523    0  1523    0     0  27196      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 26719
Warning: Problem : HTTP error. Will retry in 300 seconds. 5 retries left.

  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
gzip: stdin: not in gzip format
tar: Child died with signal 13
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now 

Source: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_assisted-service/4260/pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-release-ocm-2.6-e2e-ai-operator-ztp-disconnected/1561941429180174336

A related job search: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=gzip%3A+stdin%3A+not+in+gzip+format&maxAge=336h&context=1&type=junit&name=assisted&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4986. The following is the description of the original issue:

We should avoid errors like:

$ oc get -o json clusterversion version | jq -r '.status.history[0].acceptedRisks'
Forced through blocking failures: Precondition "ClusterVersionRecommendedUpdate" failed because of "UnknownUpdate": RetrievedUpdates=True (), so the update from 4.13.0-0.okd-2022-12-11-064650 to 4.13.0-0.okd-2022-12-13-052859 is probably neither recommended nor supported.

Instead, tweak the logic from OCPBUGS-2727, and only append the Forced through blocking failures: prefix when the forcing was required.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5136. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Provisioning on ilo4-virtualmedia BMC driver fails with error: "Creating vfat image failed: Unexpected error while running command"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13 (but will apply to older OpenShift versions too)

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.configure some nodes with ilo4-virtualmedia://
2.attempt provisioning
3.

Actual results:

provisioning fails with error similar to  Failed to inspect hardware. Reason: unable to start inspection: Validation of image href https://10.1.235.67:6183/ilo/boot-9db13f93-861a-4d27-b20d-2c228559faa2.iso failed, reason: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='10.1.235.67', port=6183): Max retries exceeded with url: /ilo/boot-9db13f93-861a-4d27-b20d-2c228559faa2.iso (Caused by SSLError(SSLCertVerificationError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: self-signed certificate in certificate chain (_ssl.c:1129)')))

Expected results:

Provisioning succeeds

Additional info:

This happens after a preceding issue with missing iLO driver configuration has been fixed (https://github.com/metal3-io/ironic-image/pull/402)

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4411. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

manually configure ipv6 addresses and route on ipv4 OCP cluster to create a dualstack cluster, newly created pods will stay in 'ContainerCreating' status

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1. enable ipv6 in network.
# more patch_dual.yaml 
- op: add
  path: /spec/clusterNetwork/-
  value:
    cidr: fd01::/48
    hostPrefix: 64
- op: add
  path: /spec/serviceNetwork/-
  value: fd02::/112
# oc patch network.config.openshift.io cluster --type='json' --patch-file patch_dual.yaml
 
2. Configure ipv6 addresses and routes

PODS=$(oc get pods -n openshift-cluster-node-tuning-operator -l openshift-app=tuned --field-selector=status.phase=Running --no-headers -o name)
i=10
for pod in $PODS; do
  oc exec -n openshift-cluster-node-tuning-operator $pod -- ip -6 addr add fd00:172:22::${i}/64 dev br-ex
  oc exec -n openshift-cluster-node-tuning-operator $pod -- ip -6 route add default via fd00:172:22::1 dev br-ex
  ((i=i+1))
done 

3. create pods and they will stay in ContainerCreating status.

4. if remove the ipv6 configuration in network, newly created pods can be ready.


Actual results:

Pod can not be running

Expected results:

Pod should be ready with both ipv4 and ipv6 address.

Additional info:

version:
# oc version
Client Version: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-30-182550
Kustomize Version: v4.5.7
Server Version: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-30-182550
Kubernetes Version: v1.25.2+5533733

Describe pods:
# oc describe pod iperf-rc-normal-qg6zd 
Name:             iperf-rc-normal-qg6zd
Namespace:        offload-testing
Priority:         0
Service Account:  default
Node:             openshift-qe-025.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/192.168.111.54
Start Time:       Thu, 01 Dec 2022 21:35:28 -0500
Labels:           name=iperf-pods-normal
Annotations:      k8s.ovn.org/pod-networks:
                    {"default":{"ip_addresses":["10.129.2.7/23","fd01:0:0:6::3/64"],"mac_address":"0a:58:0a:81:02:07","gateway_ips":["10.129.2.1","fd01:0:0:6:...
                  openshift.io/scc: restricted-v2
                  seccomp.security.alpha.kubernetes.io/pod: runtime/default
Status:           Pending
IP:               
IPs:              <none>
Controlled By:    ReplicationController/iperf-rc-normal
Containers:
  iperf:
    Container ID:   
    Image:          quay.io/openshifttest/iperf3@sha256:440c59251338e9fcf0a00d822878862038d3b2e2403c67c940c7781297953614
    Image ID:       
    Port:           <none>
    Host Port:      <none>
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       ContainerCreating
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Limits:
      memory:  340Mi
    Requests:
      memory:     340Mi
    Environment:  <none>
    Mounts:
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-4266b (ro)
Conditions:
  Type              Status
  Initialized       True 
  Ready             False 
  ContainersReady   False 
  PodScheduled      True 
Volumes:
  kube-api-access-4266b:
    Type:                    Projected (a volume that contains injected data from multiple sources)
    TokenExpirationSeconds:  3607
    ConfigMapName:           kube-root-ca.crt
    ConfigMapOptional:       <nil>
    DownwardAPI:             true
    ConfigMapName:           openshift-service-ca.crt
    ConfigMapOptional:       <nil>
QoS Class:                   Burstable
Node-Selectors:              <none>
Tolerations:                 node.kubernetes.io/memory-pressure:NoSchedule op=Exists
                             node.kubernetes.io/not-ready:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s
                             node.kubernetes.io/unreachable:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age                     From     Message
  ----     ------                  ----                    ----     -------
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  3m4s (x173 over 5h50m)  kubelet  (combined from similar events): Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_iperf-rc-normal-qg6zd_offload-testing_18673f13-37b4-40ea-aa5d-85654dfa5c85_0(4899f7150492fa4cd895c62d0ec25ac5c1507016037c31b6019849083b42cdb5): error adding pod offload-testing_iperf-rc-normal-qg6zd to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): [offload-testing/iperf-rc-normal-qg6zd/18673f13-37b4-40ea-aa5d-85654dfa5c85:ovn-kubernetes]: error adding container to network "ovn-kubernetes": CNI request failed with status 400: '[offload-testing/iperf-rc-normal-qg6zd 4899f7150492fa4cd895c62d0ec25ac5c1507016037c31b6019849083b42cdb5] [offload-testing/iperf-rc-normal-qg6zd 4899f7150492fa4cd895c62d0ec25ac5c1507016037c31b6019849083b42cdb5] failed to configure pod interface: timed out waiting for OVS port binding (ovn-installed) for 0a:58:0a:81:02:07 [10.129.2.7/23 fd01:0:0:6::3/64]
'

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3277. The following is the description of the original issue:

I saw this occur one time when running installs in a continuous loop. This was with COMPaCT_IPV4 in a non-disconnected setup.

WaitForBootrapComplete shows it can't access the API

level=info msg=Unable to retrieve cluster metadata from Agent Rest API: no clusterID known for the cluster
level=debug msg=cluster is not registered in rest API
level=debug msg=infraenv is not registered in rest API

This is because create-cluster-and-infraenv.service failed

Failed Units: 2
  create-cluster-and-infraenv.service
  NetworkManager-wait-online.service

The agentbasedinstaller register command wasn't able to retrieve the image to get the version

Nov 03 23:03:24 master-0 create-cluster-and-infraenv[2702]: time="2022-11-03T23:03:24Z" level=error msg="command 'oc adm release info -o template --template '\{{.metadata.version}}' --insecure=false registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451 --registry-config=/tmp/registry-config3852044519' exited with non-zero exit code 1: \nerror: unable to read image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451: Get \"https://registry.ci.openshift.org/v2/\": dial tcp: lookup registry.ci.openshift.org on 192.168.111.1:53: read udp 192.168.111.80:51315->192.168.111.1:53: i/o timeout\n"
Nov 03 23:03:24 master-0 create-cluster-and-infraenv[2702]: time="2022-11-03T23:03:24Z" level=error msg="failed to get image openshift version from release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451" error="command 'oc adm release info -o template --template '\{{.metadata.version}}' --insecure=false registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451 --registry-config=/tmp/registry-config3852044519' exited with non-zero exit code 1: \nerror: unable to read image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451: Get \"https://registry.ci.openshift.org/v2/\": dial tcp: lookup registry.ci.openshift.org on 192.168.111.1:53: read udp 192.168.111.80:51315->192.168.111.1:53: i/o timeout\n"

This occurs when attempting to get the release here:
https://github.com/openshift/assisted-service/blob/master/cmd/agentbasedinstaller/register.go#L58

 

We should add a retry mechanism or restart the service to handle spurious network failures like this.

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10558. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When running a cluster on application credentials, this event appears repeatedly:

ns/openshift-machine-api machineset/nhydri0d-f8dcc-kzcwf-worker-0 hmsg/173228e527 - pathological/true reason/ReconcileError could not find information for "ci.m1.xlarge"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Happens in the CI (https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_release/33330/rehearse-33330-periodic-ci-shiftstack-shiftstack-ci-main-periodic-4.13-e2e-openstack-ovn-serial/1633149670878351360).

Steps to Reproduce:

1. On a living cluster, rotate the OpenStack cloud credentials
2. Invalidate the previous credentials
3. Watch the machine-api events (`oc -n openshift-machine-api get event`). A `Warning` type of issue could not find information for "name-of-the-flavour" will appear.

If the cluster was installed using a password that you can't invalidate:
1. Rotate the cloud credentials to application credentials
2. Restart MAPO (`oc -n openshift-machine-api get pods -o NAME | xargs -r oc -n openshift-machine-api delete`)
3. Rotate cloud credentials again
4. Revoke the first application credentials you set
5. Finally watch the events (`oc -n openshift-machine-api get event`)

The event signals that MAPO wasn't able to update flavour information on the MachineSet status.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

No issue detecting the flavour details

Additional info:

Offending code likely around this line: https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-provider-openstack/blob/bcb08a7835c08d20606d75757228fd03fbb20dab/pkg/machineset/controller.go#L116

Description of problem:

Normal user cannot open the debug container from the pods(crashLoopbackoff) they created, And would be got error message:
pods "<pod name>" is forbidden: cannot set blockOwnerDeletion if an ownerReference refers to a resource you can't set finalizers on: , <nil>

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107, 4.11.z, 4.10.z

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Login OCP as a normal user
   eg: flexy-htpasswd-provider
2. Create a project, go to Developer prespective -> +Add page
3. Click "Import from Git", and provide below data to get a Pods with CrashLoopBackOff state
   Git Repo URL: https://github.com/sclorg/nodejs-ex.git
   Name: nodejs-ex-git
   Run command: star a wktw
4. Navigate to /k8s/ns/<project name>/pods page, find the pod with CrashLoopBackOff status, and go to it details page -> Logs Tab
5. Click the link of "Debug container"
6. Check if the Debug container can be opened

Actual results:

6. Error message would be shown on page, user cannot open debug container via UI
   pods "nodejs-ex-git-6dd986d8bd-9h2wj-debug-tkqk2" is forbidden: cannot set blockOwnerDeletion if an ownerReference refers to a resource you can't set finalizers on: , <nil>

Expected results:

6. Normal user could use debug container without any error message

Additional info:

The debug container could be created for the normal user successfully via CommandLine
 $ oc debug <crashloopbackoff pod name> -n <project name>

When installing OCP cluster with worker nodes VM type specified as high performance, some of the configuration settings of said VMs do not match the configuration settings a high performance VM should have.

Specific configurations that do not match are described in subtasks.

 

Default configuration settings of high performance VMs:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.4/html-single/virtual_machine_management_guide/index?extIdCarryOver=true&sc_cid=701f2000001Css5AAC#Configuring_High_Performance_Virtual_Machines_Templates_and_Pools

When installing OCP cluster with worker nodes VM type specified as high performance, manual and automatic migration is enabled in the said VMs.
However, high performance worker VMs are created with default values of the engine, so only manual migration should be enabled.

Default configuration settings of high performance VMs:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.4/html-single/virtual_machine_management_guide/index?extIdCarryOver=true&sc_cid=701f2000001Css5AAC#Configuring_High_Performance_Virtual_Machines_Templates_and_Pools

How reproducible: 100%

How to reproduce:

1. Create install-config.yaml with a vmType field and set it to high performance, i.e.:

apiVersion: v1
baseDomain: basedomain.com
compute:
- architecture: amd64
  hyperthreading: Enabled
  name: worker
  platform:
    ovirt:
      affinityGroupsNames: []
      vmType: high_performance
  replicas: 2
...

2. Run installation

./openshift-install create cluster --dir=resources --log-level=debug

3. Check worker VM's configuration in the RHV webconsole.

Expected:
Only manual migration (under Host) should be enabled.

Actual:
Manual and automatic migration is enabled.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3993. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
On Openshift on Openstack CI, we are deploying an OCP cluster with an additional network on the workers in install-config.yaml for integration with Openstack Manila.

compute:
- name: worker
  platform:
    openstack:
      zones: []
      additionalNetworkIDs: ['0eeae16f-bbc7-4e49-90b2-d96419b7c30d']
  replicas: 3

As a result, the egressIP annotation includes two interfaces definition:

$ oc get node ostest-hp9ld-worker-0-gdp5k -o json | jq -r '.metadata.annotations["cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig"]' | jq .                                 
[
  {
    "interface": "207beb76-5476-4a05-b412-d0cc53ab00a7",
    "ifaddr": {
      "ipv4": "10.46.44.64/26"
    },
    "capacity": {
      "ip": 8
    }
  },
  {
    "interface": "2baf2232-87f7-4ad5-bd80-b6586de08435",
    "ifaddr": {
      "ipv4": "172.17.5.0/24"
    },
    "capacity": {
      "ip": 10
    }
  }
]

According to Huiran Wang, egressIP only works for primary interface on the node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-22-012345
RHOS-16.1-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

Deploy cluster with additional Network on the workers

Actual results:

It is possible to select an egressIP network for a secondary interface

Expected results:

Only primary subnet can be chosen for egressIP

Additional info:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPQE-12968

Description of problem:

Currently we are not gathering Machine objects. We got nomination for a rule that will use this resource.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:
Follow-up of: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2988

This failure is perma-failing in the e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway jobs.

Example: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway/1597574181430497280
Search CI: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=when+using+openshift+ovn-kubernetes+should+ensure+egressfirewall+is+created&maxAge=336h&context=1&type=junit&name=e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job
Sippy: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/jobs/4.13/analysis?filters=%7B%22items%22%3A%5B%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22name%22%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22equals%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway%22%7D%5D%7D

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12,4.13

How reproducible:

Every time

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup dualstack KinD cluster
2. Create egress fw policy with spec
Spec:
  Egress:
    To:
      Cidr Selector:  0.0.0.0/0
    Type:             Deny
3. create a pod and ping to 1.1.1.1

Actual results:

Egress policy does not block flows to external IP

Expected results:

Egress policy blocks flows to external IP

Additional info:

It seems mixing ip4 and ip6 operands in ACL matchs doesnt work

Description of problem:

InstanceMetadataTags are not supported in AWS C2S region(us-iso-x)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. OCP4.11 IPI Installation on AWS C2S regions
2. 
3. 

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

Actual Error: 

"Error launching resource Instance. Unsupported Operation Specifying InstanceMetadataTags is not yet supported"

There is a related fix on upstream:

resource/aws_instance: Handle regions where instance metadata tags are unsupported
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/pull/26631

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2113973](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113973). The following is the description of the original bug:

If we define a custom scc like this:

allowHostDirVolumePlugin: true
allowHostIPC: false
allowHostNetwork: false
allowHostPID: false
allowHostPorts: false
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
allowPrivilegedContainer: false
allowedCapabilities: []
apiVersion: security.openshift.io/v1
defaultAddCapabilities: []
fsGroup:
type: MustRunAs
groups:

  • system:authenticated
    kind: SecurityContextConstraints
    metadata:
    annotations:
    kubernetes.io/description: MCP Vault Unsealer
    meta.helm.sh/release-name: vault
    meta.helm.sh/release-namespace: mcp-vault
    creationTimestamp: "2022-07-25T11:09:53Z"
    generation: 2
    labels:
    app.kubernetes.io/instance: vault
    app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: Helm
    app.kubernetes.io/name: vault-unsealer
    app.kubernetes.io/version: 3.7.0
    helm.sh/chart: vault-unsealer-3.7.1
    name: vault-unsealer
    resourceVersion: "1793493"
    uid: 6b6d88be-03c0-476d-8602-2e94e4ecfcb5
    priority: null
    readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
    requiredDropCapabilities:
  • KILL
  • MKNOD
  • SETUID
  • SETGID
    runAsUser:
    type: RunAsAny
    seLinuxContext:
    type: MustRunAs
    supplementalGroups:
    type: RunAsAny
    users:
  • system:serviceaccount:mcp-vault:vault-unsealer
    volumes:
  • configMap
  • hostPath
  • secret

we can see that the pod originally has this scc:

oc get pod machine-config-operator-7f57686f5c-g895k -o yaml | grep scc
openshift.io/scc: hostmount-anyuid

After applying the new SCC ( even if we set a higher priority ) the pod is showing after restart:

oc get pod machine-config-operator-7f57686f5c-jg2jv -o yaml | grep scc
openshift.io/scc: vault-unsealer

Both `[sig-devex][Feature:ImageEcosystem][mysql][Slow] openshift mysql image Creating from a template should instantiate the template [apigroup:apps.openshift.io]` and `[sig-devex][Feature:ImageEcosystem][mariadb][Slow] openshift mariadb image Creating from a template should instantiate the template [apigroup:image.openshift.io][apigroup:operator.openshift.io][apigroup:config.openshift.io][apigroup:apps.openshift.io]` are repeatedly failing over multiple PRs.

More links in https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27502#issuecomment-1304613482

Opening this issue to temporarily skip the broken tests to unblocking merging PRs in openshift/origin:master

More details in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3339

We rely on the user providing accurate information about the MAC addresses in the agent-config, because at the point we read it we haven't seen the hosts yet. However, if the user gets this wrong then chaos may ensue.

Once inventory is available, we should validate that the user has not:

  • Specified MAC addresses that belong to two different agents in the same host config; nor
  • Specified MAC addresses that belong to the same agent in two different host configs

and fail the install if they have.

In multinode we can check nodes object in kubeapi as we can't really validate hosts that are not part of cluster, only the one controller is running on.

And we should validate ip of the host controller is running on.

In case ip was changed log it

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8035. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

install discnnect private cluster, ssh to master/bootstrap nodes from the bastion on the vpc failed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Pre-merge build https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6836
registry.build05.ci.openshift.org/ci-ln-5g4sj02/release:latest
Tag: 4.13.0-0.ci.test-2023-02-27-033047-ci-ln-5g4sj02-latest

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create bastion instance maxu-ibmj-p1-int-svc 
2.Create vpc on the bastion host 
3.Install private disconnect cluster on the bastion host with mirror registry 
4.ssh to the bastion  
5.ssh to the master/bootstrap nodes from the bastion 

Actual results:

[core@maxu-ibmj-p1-int-svc ~]$ ssh -i ~/openshift-qe.pem core@10.241.0.5 -v
OpenSSH_8.8p1, OpenSSL 3.0.5 5 Jul 2022
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/50-redhat.conf
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/openssh.config
debug1: configuration requests final Match pass
debug1: re-parsing configuration
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/50-redhat.conf
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/openssh.config
debug1: Connecting to 10.241.0.5 [10.241.0.5] port 22.
debug1: connect to address 10.241.0.5 port 22: Connection timed out
ssh: connect to host 10.241.0.5 port 22: Connection timed out

Expected results:

ssh succeed.

Additional info:

$ibmcloud is sg-rules r014-5a6c16f4-8a4c-4c02-ab2d-626c14f72a77 --vpc maxu-ibmj-p1-vpc
Listing rules of security group r014-5a6c16f4-8a4c-4c02-ab2d-626c14f72a77 under account OpenShift-QE as user ServiceId-dff277a9-b608-410a-ad24-c544e59e3778...
ID                                          Direction   IP version   Protocol                      Remote   
r014-6739d68f-6827-41f4-b51a-5da742c353b2   outbound    ipv4         all                           0.0.0.0/0   
r014-06d44c15-d3fd-4a14-96c4-13e96aa6769c   inbound     ipv4         all                           shakiness-perfectly-rundown-take   r014-25b86956-5370-4925-adaf-89dfca9fb44b   inbound     ipv4         tcp Ports:Min=22,Max=22       0.0.0.0/0   
r014-e18f0f5e-c4e5-44a5-b180-7a84aa59fa97   inbound     ipv4         tcp Ports:Min=3128,Max=3129   0.0.0.0/0   
r014-7e79c4b7-d0bb-4fab-9f5d-d03f6b427d89   inbound     ipv4         icmp Type=8,Code=0            0.0.0.0/0   
r014-03f23b04-c67a-463d-9754-895b8e474e75   inbound     ipv4         tcp Ports:Min=5000,Max=5000   0.0.0.0/0   
r014-8febe8c8-c937-42b6-b352-8ae471749321   inbound     ipv4         tcp Ports:Min=6001,Max=6002   0.0.0.0/0   

Description of problem:

scale up more worker nodes but they are not added to the Load Balancer instances (backend pool), if moving the router pod to the new worker nodes then co/ingress becomes degraded

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. ensure the fresh install cluster works well.
2. scale up worker nodes.
$ oc -n openshift-machine-api get machineset
NAME                                  DESIRED   CURRENT   READY   AVAILABLE   AGE
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a   1         1         1       1           5h21m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b   1         1         1       1           5h21m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2c   1         1         1       1           5h21m

$ oc -n openshift-machine-api scale machineset hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a --replicas=2
machineset.machine.openshift.io/hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a scaled

$ oc -n openshift-machine-api scale machineset hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b --replicas=2
machineset.machine.openshift.io/hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b scaled

(about 5 minutes later)
$ oc -n openshift-machine-api get machineset
NAME                                  DESIRED   CURRENT   READY   AVAILABLE   AGE
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a   2         2         2       2           5h29m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b   2         2         2       2           5h29m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2c   1         1         1       1           5h29m


3. delete router pods and to make new ones running on new workers

$ oc get node
NAME                                         STATUS   ROLES                  AGE     VERSION
ip-10-0-128-45.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker                 71m     v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-131-192.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    control-plane,master   6h35m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-139-51.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker                 6h29m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-162-228.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker                 71m     v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-172-216.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    control-plane,master   6h35m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-190-82.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker                 6h25m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-196-26.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    control-plane,master   6h35m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-199-158.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker                 6h28m   v1.25.2+4bd0702

$ oc -n openshift-ingress get pod -owide
NAME                              READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE   IP           NODE                                         NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
router-default-86444dcd84-cm96l   1/1     Running   0          65m   10.130.2.7   ip-10-0-128-45.us-east-2.compute.internal    <none>           <none>
router-default-86444dcd84-vpnjz   1/1     Running   0          65m   10.131.2.7   ip-10-0-162-228.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>


Actual results:

$ oc get co ingress console authentication
NAME             VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
ingress          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         True       66m     The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: CanaryChecksSucceeding=False (CanaryChecksRepetitiveFailures: Canary route checks for the default ingress controller are failing)
console          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       False         False      66m     RouteHealthAvailable: failed to GET route (https://console-openshift-console.apps.hongli-1024.qe.devcluster.openshift.com): Get "https://console-openshift-console.apps.hongli-1024.qe.devcluster.openshift.com": EOF
authentication   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       False         True       66m     OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.hongli-1024.qe.devcluster.openshift.com/healthz": EOF


checked the Load Balancer on AWS console and found that new created nodes are not added to load balancer. see the snapshot attached.

Expected results:

the LB should added new created instances automatically and ingress should work with new workers.

Additional info:

1. this is also reproducible with common user created LoadBalancer service.
2. if the LB service is created after adding the new nodes then it works well, we can see that all nodes are added to LB on AWS console.  

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3767. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Start maintenance action moved from Nodes tab to Bare Metal Hosts tab

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-15-024309

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install Node Maintenance operator
2. Go Compute -> Nodes
3. Start maintenance from 3dots menu of worker-0-0
see https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/nodes/nodes/eco-node-maintenance-operator.html#eco-setting-node-maintenance-actions-web-console_node-maintenance-operator

Actual results:

No 'Start maintenance' option

Expected results:

Maintenance started successfully

Additional info:

worked for 4.11

 

 

Description of problem:

When solving flakiness of a test in IO tests, we found that there are some issues in the cluster_version_matches condition for the conditional gatherer. 

Firstly the character limit should be increased as 32 characters does not cover every possible release version as some exceed that limit. 
Furthermore, there is an error in the schema

https://github.com/openshift/insights-operator/blob/master/pkg/gatherers/conditional/gathering_rule.schema.json#L101

There is no name, it should be version

How reproducible:

Sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Spin a cluster from a PR
2. If version exceeds 32 characters, we get in the pod logs: 'Could not get version from string: "<"'
 

Actual results:

'Could not get version from string: "<"'

Expected results:

Metadata should contain "Metadata should contain invalid range error"

Additional info:

However, since there's the possibility for versions to exceed 32 characters, we shouldn't expect an error in this situation. Therefore, there might be more than one issue.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4049. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

In case of CRC we provision the cluster first and the create the disk image out of it and that what we share to our users. Now till now we always remove the pull secret from the cluster after provision it using https://github.com/crc-org/snc/blob/master/snc.sh#L241-L258 and it worked without any issue till 4.11.x but for 4.12.0-rc.1 we are seeing that MCO not able to reconcile.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a single node cluster using cluster bot `launch 4.12.0-rc.1 aws,single-node` 

2. Once cluster is provisioned update the pull secret from the config 

```
$ cat pull-secret.yaml 
apiVersion: v1
data:
  .dockerconfigjson: e30K
kind: Secret
metadata:
  name: pull-secret
  namespace: openshift-config
type: kubernetes.io/dockerconfigjson
$ oc replace -f pull-secret.yaml
```

3. Wait for MCO recocile and you will see failure to reconcile MCO

Actual results:

$ oc get mcp
NAME     CONFIG                                             UPDATED   UPDATING   DEGRADED   MACHINECOUNT   READYMACHINECOUNT   UPDATEDMACHINECOUNT   DEGRADEDMACHINECOUNT   AGE
master   rendered-master-66086aa249a9f92b773403f7c3745ea4   False     True       True       1              0                   0                     1                      94m
worker   rendered-worker-0c07becff7d3c982e24257080cc2981b   True      False      False      0              0                   0                     0                      94m


$ oc get co machine-config
NAME             VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
machine-config   4.12.0-rc.1   True        False         True       93m     Failed to resync 4.12.0-rc.1 because: error during syncRequiredMachineConfigPools: [timed out waiting for the condition, error pool master is not ready, retrying. Status: (pool degraded: true total: 1, ready 0, updated: 0, unavailable: 0)]

$ oc logs machine-config-daemon-nf9mg -n openshift-machine-config-operator
[...]
I1123 15:00:37.864581   10194 run.go:19] Running: podman pull -q --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba
Error: initializing source docker://quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba: (Mirrors also failed: [quayio-pull-through-cache-us-west-2-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba: reading manifest sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba in quayio-pull-through-cache-us-west-2-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev: unauthorized: authentication required]): quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba: reading manifest sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba in quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev: unauthorized: access to the requested resource is not authorized
W1123 15:00:39.186103   10194 run.go:45] podman failed: running podman pull -q --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba failed: Error: initializing source docker://quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba: (Mirrors also failed: [quayio-pull-through-cache-us-west-2-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba: reading manifest sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba in quayio-pull-through-cache-us-west-2-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev: unauthorized: authentication required]): quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba: reading manifest sha256:ffa3568233298408421ff7da60e5c594fb63b2551c6ab53843eb51c8cf6838ba in quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev: unauthorized: access to the requested resource is not authorized
: exit status 125; retrying...

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

See https://github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/issues/1045

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

prometheus-k8s-0 ends in CrashLoopBackOff with evel=error err="opening storage failed: /prometheus/chunks_head/000002: invalid magic number 0" on SNO after hard reboot tests

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.6

How reproducible:

Not always, after ~10 attempts

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with Telco DU profile applied
2. Hard reboot node via out of band interface
3. oc -n openshift-monitoring get pods prometheus-k8s-0 

Actual results:

NAME               READY   STATUS             RESTARTS          AGE
prometheus-k8s-0   5/6     CrashLoopBackOff   125 (4m57s ago)   5h28m

Expected results:

Running

Additional info:

Attaching must-gather.

The pod recovers successfully after deleting/re-creating.


[kni@registry.kni-qe-0 ~]$ oc -n openshift-monitoring logs prometheus-k8s-0
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:552 level=info msg="Starting Prometheus Server" mode=server version="(version=2.36.2, branch=rhaos-4.11-rhel-8, revision=0d81ba04ce410df37ca2c0b1ec619e1bc02e19ef)"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:557 level=info build_context="(go=go1.18.4, user=root@371541f17026, date=20220916-14:15:37)"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:558 level=info host_details="(Linux 4.18.0-372.26.1.rt7.183.el8_6.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_RT Sat Aug 27 22:04:33 EDT 2022 x86_64 prometheus-k8s-0 (none))"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:559 level=info fd_limits="(soft=1048576, hard=1048576)"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.919Z caller=main.go:560 level=info vm_limits="(soft=unlimited, hard=unlimited)"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.921Z caller=web.go:553 level=info component=web msg="Start listening for connections" address=127.0.0.1:9090
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.922Z caller=main.go:989 level=info msg="Starting TSDB ..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.924Z caller=tls_config.go:231 level=info component=web msg="TLS is disabled." http2=false
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:848 level=info msg="Stopping scrape discovery manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:862 level=info msg="Stopping notify discovery manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=manager.go:951 level=info component="rule manager" msg="Stopping rule manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=manager.go:961 level=info component="rule manager" msg="Rule manager stopped"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:899 level=info msg="Stopping scrape manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:858 level=info msg="Notify discovery manager stopped"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:891 level=info msg="Scrape manager stopped"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=notifier.go:599 level=info component=notifier msg="Stopping notification manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:844 level=info msg="Scrape discovery manager stopped"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=manager.go:937 level=info component="rule manager" msg="Starting rule manager..."
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:1120 level=info msg="Notifier manager stopped"
ts=2022-09-26T14:54:01.926Z caller=main.go:1129 level=error err="opening storage failed: /prometheus/chunks_head/000002: invalid magic number 0"

Description of problem:

When scaling down the machineSet for worker nodes, a PV(vmdk) file got deleted.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10

How reproducible:

N/A

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Scale down worker nodes
2. Check VMware logs and VM gets deleted with vmdk still attached

Actual results:

After scaling down nodes, volumes still attached to the VM get deleted alongside the VM

Expected results:

Worker nodes scaled down without any accidental deletion

Additional info: