Back to index

4.12.18

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.58

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

There is a new driver release 5.0.0 since the last rebase that includes snapshot support:

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/releases/tag/v5.0.0

Rebase the driver on v5.0.0 and update the deployments in ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator.
There are no corresponding changes in ibm-vpc-node-label-updater since the last rebase.

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

This includes ibm-vpc-node-label-updater!

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The End of General support for vSphere 6.7 will be on October 15, 2022. So, vSphere 6.7 will be deprecated for 4.11.

We want to encourage vSphere customers to upgrade to vSphere 7 in OCP 4.11 since VMware is EOLing (general support) for vSphere 6.7 in Oct 2022.

We want the cluster Upgradeable=false + have a strong alert pointing to our docs / requirements.

related slack: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CH06KMDRV/p1647541493096729

Epic Goal

  • Enable the migration from a storage intree driver to a CSI based driver with minimal impact to the end user, applications and cluster
  • These migrations would include, but are not limited to:
    • CSI driver for AWS EBS
    • CSI driver for GCP
    • CSI driver for Azure (file and disk)
    • CSI driver for VMware vSphere

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

This Epic tracks the GA of this feature

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

OC mirror is GA product as of Openshift 4.11 .

The goal of this feature is to solve any future customer request for new features or capabilities in OC mirror 

Epic Goal

  • Mirror to mirror operations and custom mirroring flows required by IBM CloudPak catalog management

Why is this important?

  • IBM needs additional customization around the actual mirroring of images to enable CloudPaks to fully adopt OLM-style operator packaging and catalog management
  • IBM CloudPaks introduce additional compute architectures, increasing the download volume by 2/3rds to day, we need the ability to effectively filter non-required image versions of OLM operator catalogs during filtering for other customers that only require a single or a subset of the available image architectures
  • IBM CloudPaks regularly run on older OCP versions like 4.8 which require additional work to be able to read the mirrored catalog produced by oc mirror

Scenarios

  1. Customers can use the oc utility and delegate the actual image mirror step to another tool
  2. Customers can mirror between disconnected registries using the oc utility
  3. The oc utility supports filtering manifest lists in the context of multi-arch images according to the sparse manifest list proposal in the distribution spec

Acceptance Criteria

  • Customers can use the oc utility to mirror between two different air-gapped environments
  • Customers can specify the desired computer architectures and oc mirror will create sparse manifest lists in the target registry as a result

Dependencies (internal and external)

Previous Work:

  1. WRKLDS-369
  2. Disconnected Mirroring Improvement Proposal

Related Work:

  1. https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/pull/310
  2. https://github.com/distribution/distribution/pull/3536
  3. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10ozLoV7sVPLB8msLx4LYamooQDSW-CAnLiNiJ9SER2k/edit?usp=sharing

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

Overview 

HyperShift came to life to serve multiple goals, some are main near-term, some are secondary that serve well long-term. 

Main Goals for hosted control planes (HyperShift)

  • Optimize OpenShift for Cost/footprint/ which improves our competitive stance against the *KSes
  • Establish separation of concerns which makes it more resilient for SRE to manage their workload clusters (be it security, configuration management, etc).
  • Simplify and enhance multi-cluster management experience especially since multi-cluster is becoming an industry need nowadays. 

Secondary Goals

HyperShift opens up doors to penetrate the market. HyperShift enables true hybrid (CP and Workers decoupled, mixed IaaS, mixed Arch,...). An architecture that opens up more options to target new opportunities in the cloud space. For more details on this one check: Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

 

Hosted Control Planes (HyperShift) Map 

To bring hosted control planes to our customers, we need the means to ship it. Today MCE is how HyperShift shipped, and installed so that customers can use it. There are two main customers for hosted-control-planes: 

 

  • Self-managed: In that case, Red Hat would provide hosted control planes as a service that is managed and SREed by the customer for their tenants (hence “self”-managed). In this management model, our external customers are the direct consumers of the multi-cluster control plane as a servie. Once MCE is installed, they can start to self-service dedicated control planes. 

 

  • Managed: This is OpenShift as a managed service, today we only “manage” the CP, and share the responsibility for other system components, more info here. To reduce management costs incurred by service delivery organizations which translates to operating profit (by reducing variable costs per control-plane), as well as to improve user experience, lower platform overhead (allow customers to focus mostly on writing applications and not concern themselves with infrastructure artifacts), and improve the cluster provisioning experience. HyperShift is shipped via MCE, and delivered to Red Hat managed SREs (same consumption route). However, for managed services, additional tooling needs to be refactored to support the new provisioning path. Furthermore, unlike self-managed where customers are free to bring their own observability stack, Red Hat managed SREs need to observe the managed fleet to ensure compliance with SLOs/SLIs/…

 

If you have noticed, MCE is the delivery mechanism for both management models. The difference between managed and self-managed is the consumer persona. For self-managed, it's the customer SRE for managed its the RH SRE

High-level Requirements

For us to ship HyperShift in the product (as hosted control planes) in either management model, there is a necessary readiness checklist that we need to satisfy. Below are the high-level requirements needed before GA: 

 

  • Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story (with MCE)
  • Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption  
  • Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components.  
  • Hosted control planes has an HA and a DR story
  • Hosted control planes is in parity with top-level add-on operators 
  • Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption
  • Hosted control planes is observable  
  • HyperShift as a backend to managed services is fully unblocked.

 

Please also have a look at our What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness? doc. 

Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story

Multi-cluster is becoming an industry need today not because this is where trend is going but because it’s the only viable path today to solve for many of our customer’s use-cases. Below is some reasoning why multi-cluster is a NEED:

 

 

As a result, multi-cluster management is a defining category in the market where Red Hat plays a key role. Today Red Hat solves for multi-cluster via RHACM and MCE. The goal is to simplify fleet management complexity by providing a single pane of glass to observe, secure, police, govern, configure a fleet. I.e., the operand is no longer one cluster but a set, a fleet of clusters. 

HyperShift logically centralized architecture, as well as native separation of concerns and superior cluster lifecyle management experience, makes it a great fit as the foundation of our multi-cluster management story. 

Thus the following stories are important for HyperShift: 

  • When lifecycling OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported providers from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to use a consistent UI so I can manage and operate (observe, govern,...) a fleet of clusters.
  • I want to specify HA constraints (e.g., deploy my clusters in different regions) while ensuring acceptable QoS (e.g., latency boundaries) to ensure/reduce any potential downtime for my workloads. 
  • When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported provider from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to backup any critical data so I am able to restore them in case of hosting service cluster (management cluster) failure. 

Refs:

Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption.

 

HyperShift is the core engine that will be used to provide hosted control-planes for consumption in managed and self-managed. 

 

Main user story:  When life cycling clusters as a cluster service consumer via HyperShift core APIs, I want to use a stable/backward compatible API that is less susceptible to future changes so I can provide availability guarantees. 

 

Ref: What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness?

Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components. 

 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumptions

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

HyperShift - proposed cuts from data plane

HyperShift has an HA and a DR story

When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin) I want to be able to migrate CPs from one hosting service cluster to another:

  • as means for disaster recovery in the case of total failure
  • so that scaling pressures on a management cluster can be mitigated or a management cluster can be decommissioned.

More information: 

 

Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption

To understand usage patterns and inform our decision making for the product. We need to be able to measure adoption and assess usage.

See Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

Hosted control plane is observable  

Whether it's managed or self-managed, it’s pertinent to report health metrics to be able to create meaningful Service Level Objectives (SLOs), alert of failure to meet our availability guarantees. This is especially important for our managed services path. 

HyperShift is in parity with top-level add-on operators

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-8901 

Unblock HyperShift as a backend to managed services

HyperShift for managed services is a strategic company goal as it improves usability, feature, and cost competitiveness against other managed solutions, and because managed services/consumption-based cloud services is where we see the market growing (customers are looking to delegate platform overhead). 

 

We should make sure our SD milestones are unblocked by the core team. 

 

Note 

This feature reflects HyperShift core readiness to be consumed. When all related EPICs and stories in this EPIC are complete HyperShift can be considered ready to be consumed in GA form. This does not describe a date but rather the readiness of core HyperShift to be consumed in GA form NOT the GA itself.

- GA date for self-managed will be factoring in other inputs such as adoption, customer interest/commitment, and other factors. 
- GA dates for ROSA-HyperShift are on track, tracked in milestones M1-7 (have a look at https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-5771

Epic Goal*

The goal is to split client certificate trust chains from the global Hypershift root CA.

 
Why is this important? (mandatory)

This is important to:

  • assure a workload can be run on any kind of OCP flavor
  • reduce the blast radius in case of a sensitive material leak
  • separate trust to allow more granular control over client certificate authentication

 
Scenarios (mandatory) 

Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

  1. I would like to be able to run my workloads on any OpenShift-like platform.
    My workloads allow components to authenticate using client certificates based
    on a trust bundle that I am able to retrieve from the cluster.
  1. I don't want my users to have access to any CA bundle that would allow them
    to trust a random certificate from the cluster for client certificate authentication.

 
Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

Hypershift team needs to provide us with code reviews and merge the changes we are to deliver

Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

  • Development - OpenShift Auth, Hypershift
  • Documentation -OpenShift Auth Docs team
  • QE - OpenShift Auth QE
  • PX - I have no idea what PX is
  • Others - others

Acceptance Criteria (optional)

The serviceaccount CA bundle automatically injected to all pods cannot be used to authenticate any client certificate generated by the control-plane.

Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

Risk: there is a throbbing time pressure as this should be delivered before first stable Hypershift release

Done - Checklist (mandatory)

  • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
  • Documentation - Content development is complete.
  • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
  • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
  • Engineering Stories Merged
  • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
  • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

We plan to build Ironic Container Images using RHEL9 as base image in OCP 4.12

This is required because the ironic components have abandoned support for CentOS Stream 8 and Python 3.6/3.7 upstream during the most recent development cycle that will produce the stable Zed release, in favor of CentOS Stream 9 and Python 3.8/3.9

More info on RHEL8 to RHEL9 transition in OCP can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N8KyDY7KmgUYA9EOtDDQolebz0qi3nhT20IOn4D-xS4

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a SRE, I want hypershift operator to expose a metric when hosted control plane is ready. 

This should allow SRE to tune (or silence) alerts occurring while the hosted control plane is spinning up. 

 

 

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The Kube APIServer has a sidecar to output audit logs. We need similar sidecars for other APIServers that run on the control plane side. We also need to pass the same audit log policy that we pass to the KAS to these other API servers.

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Place holder epic to track spontaneous task which does not deserve its own epic.

AC:

We have connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs flag in konnectiviy socks5 proxy to dial directly to cloud providers without going through konnectivity.

This introduce another path for exception https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1722

We should consolidate both by keep using connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs until there's a reason to not.

 

AWS has a hard limit of 100 OIDC providers globally. 
Currently each HostedCluster created by e2e creates its own OIDC provider, which results in hitting the quota limit frequently and causing the tests to fail as a result.

 
DOD:
Only a single OIDC provider should be created and shared between all e2e HostedClusters. 

DoD:

At the moment if the input etcd kms encryption (key and role) is invalid we fail transparently.

We should check that both key and role are compatible/operational for a given cluster and fail in a condition otherwise

Once the HostedCluster and NodePool gets stopped using PausedUntil statement, the awsprivatelink controller will continue reconciling.

 

How to test this:

  • Deploy a private cluster
  • Put it in pause once deployed
  • Delete the AWSEndPointService and the Service from the HCP namespace
  • And wait for a reconciliation, the result it's that they should not be recreated
  • Unpause it and wait for recreation.

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem? 

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb  

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)   

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11458. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6947. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a long standing issue where gcp ovn for some reason sees dramatically more disruption to ingress during upgrades than other clouds. It can best be seen in the "ingress" graphs in charts such as: https://lookerstudio.google.com/s/v6xhLCTHHDY

Notice image-registry-new (which is ingress backed), ingress-to-console new, and ingress-to-oauth new, all of which take an average of 40s as of the time of this writing. For comparison, Azure is normally <10, and AWS <4.

You will also note the load-balancer new backend shows similar high disruption, but after conversations with network edge we now know the code paths for these two are very different, thus we're filing this as a separate bug. The SLB bug is https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-6796. The two may prove to be same cause in future, as they do appear similar, but not identical even in terms of when the problems occur.

Some example prob jows are easy to find as the disruption is on average there. Note that we do not typically fail a test on these as the disruption monitoring stack is built to try to pin where we're at now, and this is a long standing issue.

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade/1620744632478470144

This job was near successful but got 45s of disruption to image-registry-new. The disruption observed can always be seen in artifacts such as: https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade/1620744632478470144/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/junit/backend-disruption_20230201-120923.json

Expanding the first "Intervals - spyglass" chart on the main prowjob page, you can see when the disruption occurred and what else was going on in the cluster at that time.

This shows we're not getting a continuous 40+s of disruption, rather a few batches.

The ingress services all go down roughly together, the service load balancer pattern looks a little different, thus the different bug mentioned above.

For more examples just visit https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/jobs/4.13/runs?filters=%7B%22items%22%3A%5B%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22name%22%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22equals%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade%22%7D%5D%7D&sortField=timestamp&sort=desc, it will happen nearly every time.

When examining what else was going on when this happens, we see some clear patterns of nodes being updated.

Description of problem:

Duplicate notification "Getting started" would be shown on Search page 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-26-111919

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Login OCP as normal user, and change to developer prespective, create a new project
2. Delete the project on page (switch to Administator prespective, go to Home -> Projects page)
3. Switch to Developer prespective, and go to Search page, check the notification "Getting Started"

Actual results:

Two notification shown on page

Expected results:

Only one should exist

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

On MicroShift, the Route API is served by kube-apiserver as a CRD. Reusing the same defaulting implementation as vanilla OpenShift through a patch to kube- apiserver is expected to resolve OCPBUGS-4189 but have no detectable effect on OCP.

Additional info:

This patch will be inert on OCP, but is implemented in openshift/kubernetes because MicroShift ingests kube-apiserver through its build-time dependency on openshift/kubernetes.

Description of the problem:

assisted-installer-controller Job does not apply Additional Root CA Trust Bundle

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/issues/513

How reproducible:

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/issues/513

Steps to reproduce:

1.  Create cluster with proxy and additional certificate bundle

2.Install

Actual results:

Controller failed to reach service cause of self signed certificate

Expected results:

Installation succeeds

Description of problem:

Recently during an audit on a user's cluster, it was discovered that
OLM's certificate generation functionality has a few minor shortcomings.

  1. The generated CA and server cert do not include a common name,
    which causes some tooling to have trouble tracing the cert chain.
  2. The generated CA and server cert include unnecessary key usages,
    which means those certificates can be used for more than their
    intended purposes.

How reproducible: Always

Joe Lanford could you please double check what I've put below? QE is asking for a bug ticket for this fix (makes sense as it helps them verify everything is correct and gives us traceability)

Steps to Reproduce:

oc get secret -n openshift-operator-lifecycle-manager packageserver-service-cert -o jsonpath='{.data.tls\.crt}' | base64 -d | openssl x509 -noout -text

Actual results:

  • Common Name not present in certificate data
  • X509v3 extensions looks include:
       
        X509v3 Key Usage: critical
            Digital Signature, Certificate Sign
        X509v3 Extended Key Usage: 
           TLS Web Client Authentication, TLS Web Server Authentication

Expected results:

  • Common Name must be present in certificate
  • X509v3 extensions should NOT include Digital Signature under Key Usage
  • X509v3 extensions should NOT include Extended Key Usage (other than *TLS Web Server Authentication*)

Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to the detail page of some Deployments with PDB connected to it
2. Click Edit PDB from the kebab menu
3. Inspect the second input box under the `Availability requirement `

Actual results: The name and aria-label attributes always show minAvailable

Expected results: They should be consistent with the first input box

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6175. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When the cluster is configured with Proxy the swift client in the image registry operator is not using the proxy to authenticate with OpenStack, so it's unable to reach the OpenStack API. This issue became evident since recently the support was added to not fallback to cinder in case swift is available[1].

[1]https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/819

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy a cluster with proxy and restricted installation
2. 
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Tracker issue for bootimage bump in 4.12. This issue should block issues which need a bootimage bump to fix.

The previous bump was OCPBUGS-10740.

Description of problem:

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.

2.

3.

 

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

Please fill in the following template while reporting a bug and provide as much relevant information as possible. Doing so will give us the best chance to find a prompt resolution.

Affected Platforms:

Is it an

  1. internal CI failure 
  2. customer issue / SD
  3. internal RedHat testing failure

 

If it is an internal RedHat testing failure:

  • Please share a kubeconfig or creds to a live cluster for the assignee to debug/troubleshoot along with reproducer steps (specially if it's a telco use case like ICNI, secondary bridges or BM+kubevirt).

 

If it is a CI failure:

 

  • Did it happen in different CI lanes? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
  • Did it happen in both sdn and ovn jobs? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
  • Did it happen in other platforms (e.g. aws, azure, gcp, baremetal etc) ? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
  • When did the failure start happening? Please provide the UTC timestamp of the networking outage window from a sample failure run
  • If it's a connectivity issue,
  • What is the srcNode, srcIP and srcNamespace and srcPodName?
  • What is the dstNode, dstIP and dstNamespace and dstPodName?
  • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)

 

If it is a customer / SD issue:

 

  • Provide enough information in the bug description that Engineering doesn’t need to read the entire case history.
  • Don’t presume that Engineering has access to Salesforce.
  • Please provide must-gather and sos-report with an exact link to the comment in the support case with the attachment.  The format should be: https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/#/case/<case number>/discussion?attachmentId=<attachment id>
  • Describe what each attachment is intended to demonstrate (failed pods, log errors, OVS issues, etc).  
  • Referring to the attached must-gather, sosreport or other attachment, please provide the following details:
    • If the issue is in a customer namespace then provide a namespace inspect.
    • If it is a connectivity issue:
      • What is the srcNode, srcNamespace, srcPodName and srcPodIP?
      • What is the dstNode, dstNamespace, dstPodName and  dstPodIP?
      • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
      • Please provide the UTC timestamp networking outage window from must-gather
      • Please provide tcpdump pcaps taken during the outage filtered based on the above provided src/dst IPs
    • If it is not a connectivity issue:
      • Describe the steps taken so far to analyze the logs from networking components (cluster-network-operator, OVNK, SDN, openvswitch, ovs-configure etc) and the actual component where the issue was seen based on the attached must-gather. Please attach snippets of relevant logs around the window when problem has happened if any.
  • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has been identified, label with “sbr-triaged”
  • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has not been identified and needs Engineering help for root cause, labels with “sbr-untriaged”
  • Note: bugs that do not meet these minimum standards will be closed with label “SDN-Jira-template”

This ticket is linked with

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDA-8177
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDA-8178

As a summary, a base domain for a hosted cluster may already contain the "cluster-name".

But it seems that Hypershift also encodes it during some reconciliation step:

https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/main/support/globalconfig/dns.go#L20

Then when using a DNS base domain like:

"rosa.lponce-prod-01.qtii.p3.openshiftapps.com"

we will have A records like:

"*.apps.lponce-prod-01.rosa.lponce-prod-01.qtii.p3.openshiftapps.com"

The expected behaviour would be that given a DNS base domain:

"rosa.lponce-prod-01.qtii.p3.openshiftapps.com"

The resulting wildcard for Ingress would be:

"*.apps.rosa.lponce-prod-01.qtii.p3.openshiftapps.com"

Note that trying to configure a specific IngressSpec for a hosted cluster didn't work for our case, as the wildcards records are not created.

Description of problem:

The icon color of Alerts in the Topology list view should be based on alert type.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create a deployment
2. Create a resource quota so that quota alert will be visible in topology list page
3. navigate to topology list page
3.

Actual results:

Alert icon color is black and white. See the screenshots

Expected results:

Alert icon color should be base on alert type. 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

vSphere privilege checking failing when providing user-defined folder and/or resource pool

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-30-054458

How reproducible:

consistently

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Provide pre-existing folder and/or resource pool to the install-config
2. Perform an installation with an account with read only privileges on the datacenter and cluster
3. The installer will fail with missing privileges for the cluster and datacenter.  When a pre-existing folder and resource pool are defined, the account can hold read only privileges on the datacenter and cluster .

Actual results:

Installer reports missing privileges

Expected results:

Installer should succeed

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7729. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Etcd's liveliness probe should be removed. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

Additional info:

When the Master Hosts hit CPU load this can cause a cascading restart loop for etcd and kube-api due to the etcd liveliness probes failing. Due to this loop load on the masters stays high because the api and controllers restarting over and over again..  

There is no reason for etcd to have a liveliness probe, we removed this probe in 3.11 due issues like this.  

Description of problem:

Not all rules removed from iptables after disabling multinetworkpolicy

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Configure sriov (nodepolicy + sriovnetwork)
2. Configure 2 pods
3. enable MutiNetworkPolicy
4. apply ~20 rules for pod1:
 spec:
  podSelector:
    matchLabels:
      pod: pod1
  policyTypes:
  - Ingress
  ingress: []
5. Disable multinetworkpolicy
6. send ping pod2 => pod1

Actual results:

Traffic is still blocked

Expected results:

Traffic should be passed

Additional info:

Before disabling multiNetworkPolicy:
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-0-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default24 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-1-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default17 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-2-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default15 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-3-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default14 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-4-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default7 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-5-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default5 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-6-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default20 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-7-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default19 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-8-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default11 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-9-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default10 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-10-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default9 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-11-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default6 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-12-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default3 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-13-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default16 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-14-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default13 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-15-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default2 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-16-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default22 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-17-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default21 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-18-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default18 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-19-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default12 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-20-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default8 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-21-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default4 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-22-INGRESS
-A MULTI-0-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-1-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-2-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-3-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-4-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-5-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-6-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-7-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-8-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-9-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-10-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-11-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-12-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-13-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-14-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-15-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-16-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-17-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-18-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-19-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-20-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-21-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-22-INGRESS -j DROP
=============================================================
After disabling multiNetworkPolicy:
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default5 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-0-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default24 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-1-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default17 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-2-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default15 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-3-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default7 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-4-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default3 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-5-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default20 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-6-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default19 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-7-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default9 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-8-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default6 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-9-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default16 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-10-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default2 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-11-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default22 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-12-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default21 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-13-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default18 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-14-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default8 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-15-INGRESS
-A MULTI-INGRESS -i int1 -m comment --comment "policy:deny-by-default4 net-attach-def:ns1/sriovnetwork2" -j MULTI-16-INGRESS
-A MULTI-0-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-1-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-2-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-3-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-4-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-5-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-6-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-7-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-8-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-9-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-10-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-11-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-12-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-13-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-14-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-15-INGRESS -j DROP
-A MULTI-16-INGRESS -j DROP

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1704. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

According to OCP 4.11 doc (https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/installing/installing_gcp/installing-gcp-account.html#installation-gcp-enabling-api-services_installing-gcp-account), the Service Usage API (serviceusage.googleapis.com) is an optional API service to be enabled. But, the installation cannot succeed if this API is disabled.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-25-071630

How reproducible:

Always, if the Service Usage API is disabled in the GCP project.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Make sure the Service Usage API (serviceusage.googleapis.com) is disabled in the GCP project.
2. Try IPI installation in the GCP project. 

Actual results:

The installation would fail finally, without any worker machines launched.

Expected results:

Installation should succeed, or the OCP doc should be updated.

Additional info:

Please see the attached must-gather logs (http://virt-openshift-05.lab.eng.nay.redhat.com/jiwei/jiwei-0926-03-cnxn5/) and the sanity check results. 
FYI if enabling the API, and without changing anything else, the installation could succeed. 

Description of problem:

Git icon shown in the repository details page should be based on the git provider.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a Repository with gitlab repo url
2. Navigate to the detail page.

Actual results:

github icon is displayed for the gitlab url.

Expected results:

gitlab icon should be displayed for the gitlab url.

Additional info:

use `GitLabIcon` and `BitBucketIcon` from patternfly react-icons.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2479. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Right border radius is 0 for the pipeline visualization wrapper in dark mode but looks fine in light mode

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Switch the theme to dark mode
2. Create a pipeline and navigate to the Pipeline details page

Actual results:

Right border radius is 0, see the screenshots

Expected results:

Right border radius should be same as left border radius.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

i18n translation missing in "Remove component node from application" modal

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Navigate to dev console and create a workload under an Application group
2. On the Toplogy remove the workload from the Application group
3. See the i18n error in the console

Actual results:

Missing i18n key "Remove component node from application" in namespace "topology" and language "en." in console

Expected results:

No i18n error should be shown in the console.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

TestUnmanagedDNSToManagedDNSInternalIngressController E2E test is failing on the error:
{
unmanaged_dns_test.go:272: failed to verify connectivity with workload with reqURL http://10.0.128.7 using external client: timed out waiting for the condition  

How reproducible:

About 75% of the time.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

75%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Run CI E2E tests on cluster-ingress-operator or 
make test-e2e TEST=TestUnmanagedDNSToManagedDNSInternalIngressController 

Actual results:

E2E test fails about 75% of the time

Expected results:

E2E should always pass

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10678. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10655. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
The dev console shows a list of samples. The user can create a sample based on a git repository. But some of these samples doesn't include a git repository reference and could not be created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Tested different frontend versions against a 4.11 cluster and all (oldest tested frontend was 4.8) show the sample without git repository.

But the result also depends on the installed samples operator and installed ImageStreams.

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Switch to the Developer perspective
  2. Navigate to Add > All Samples
  3. Search for Jboss
  4. Click on "JBoss EAP XP 4.0 with OpenJDK 11" (for example)

Actual results:
The git repository is not filled and the create button is disabled.

Expected results:
Samples without git repositories should not be displayed in the list.

Additional info:
The Git repository is saved as "sampleRepo" in the ImageStream tag section.

job=pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-builds=all

This test has started permafailing on e2e-gcp-builds:

[sig-builds][Feature:Builds][Slow] s2i build with environment file in sources Building from a template should create a image from "test-env-build.json" template and run it in a pod [apigroup:build.openshift.io][apigroup:image.openshift.io]

The error in the test says

Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:21 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulling: Pulling image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8"
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulled: Successfully pulled image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8" in 1.763914719s
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Created: Created container test
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Started: Started container test
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:24 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulled: Container image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8" already present on machine
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:25 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Unhealthy: Readiness probe failed: Get "http://10.129.2.63:8080/": dial tcp 10.129.2.63:8080: connect: connection refused
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:26 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} BackOff: Back-off restarting failed container

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3405. The following is the description of the original issue:

In case it should be used for publishing artifacts in CI jobs.

Look into to see if the following things are leaked:

  • pull secret
  • ssh key
  • potentially values in journal logs

Description of problem:

When the Insights operator is marked as disabled then the "Available" operator condition is updated every 2 mins. This is not desired and gives an impression that the operator is restarted every 2 mins 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

No extra steps needed, just watch "oc get co insights --watch"

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

available condition transition time updated every 2 min

Expected results:

available condition is updated only when its status changed

Additional info:

 

 As mentioned in AITRIAGE-3520, there multiple attempts to grab controller logs might fail at some point and override existing logs.

In the case of the ticket I mentioned, we were able to retrieve controller logs from the logs server. However, this might not always be the case for other clusters.

We need to find a way to preserve all logs, or time out log collection differently.

 

The way we thought it can be handled is by writing logs inside container and in case kube-api is not reachable we will read logs from file

Omer Tuchfeld Nir Magnezi  Mat Kowalski 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11636. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The ACLs are disabled for all newly created s3 buckets, this causes all OCP installs to fail: the bootstrap ignition can not be uploaded:

level=info msg=Creating infrastructure resources...
level=error
level=error msg=Error: error creating S3 bucket ACL for yunjiang-acl413-4dnhx-bootstrap: AccessControlListNotSupported: The bucket does not allow ACLs
level=error msg=	status code: 400, request id: HTB2HSH6XDG0Q3ZA, host id: V6CrEgbc6eyfJkUbLXLxuK4/0IC5hWCVKEc1RVonSbGpKAP1RWB8gcl5dfyKjbrLctVlY5MG2E4=
level=error
level=error msg=  with aws_s3_bucket_acl.ignition,
level=error msg=  on main.tf line 62, in resource "aws_s3_bucket_acl" "ignition":
level=error msg=  62: resource "aws_s3_bucket_acl" ignition {
level=error
level=error msg=failed to fetch Cluster: failed to generate asset "Cluster": failure applying terraform for "bootstrap" stage: failed to create cluster: failed to apply Terraform: exit status 1
level=error
level=error msg=Error: error creating S3 bucket ACL for yunjiang-acl413-4dnhx-bootstrap: AccessControlListNotSupported: The bucket does not allow ACLs
level=error msg=	status code: 400, request id: HTB2HSH6XDG0Q3ZA, host id: V6CrEgbc6eyfJkUbLXLxuK4/0IC5hWCVKEc1RVonSbGpKAP1RWB8gcl5dfyKjbrLctVlY5MG2E4=
level=error
level=error msg=  with aws_s3_bucket_acl.ignition,
level=error msg=  on main.tf line 62, in resource "aws_s3_bucket_acl" "ignition":
level=error msg=  62: resource "aws_s3_bucket_acl" ignition {


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11+
 

How reproducible:

Always
 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create a cluster via IPI

Actual results:

install fail
 

Expected results:

install succeed
 

Additional info:

Heads-Up: Amazon S3 Security Changes Are Coming in April of 2023 - https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/heads-up-amazon-s3-security-changes-are-coming-in-april-of-2023/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/object-ownership-error-responses.html - After you apply the bucket owner enforced setting for Object Ownership, ACLs are disabled.

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4758. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

See: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CPSYN-143

tldr:  Based on the previous direction that 4.12 was going to enforce PSA restricted by default, OLM had to make a few changes because the way we run catalog pods (and we have to run them that way because of how the opm binary worked) was incompatible w/ running restricted.

1) We set openshift-marketplace to enforce restricted (this was our choice, we didn't have to do it, but we did)
2) we updated the opm binary so catalog images using a newer opm binary don't have to run privileged
3) we added a field to catalogsource that allows you to choose whether to run the pod privileged(legacy mode) or restricted.  The default is restricted.  We made that the default so that users running their own catalogs in their own NSes (which would be default PSA enforcing) would be able to be successful w/o needing their NS upgraded to privileged.

Unfortunately this means:
1) legacy catalog images(i.e. using older opm binaries) won't run on 4.12 by default (the catalogsource needs to be modified to specify legacy mode.
2) legacy catalog images cannot be run in the openshift-marketplace NS since that NS does not allow privileged pods.  This means legacy catalogs can't contribute to the global catalog (since catalogs must be in that NS to be in the global catalog).

Before 4.12 ships we need to:
1) remove the PSA restricted label on the openshift-marketplace NS
2) change the catalogsource securitycontextconfig mode default to use "legacy" as the default, not restricted.

This gives catalog authors another release to update to using a newer opm binary that can run restricted, or get their NSes explicitly labeled as privileged (4.12 will not enforce restricted, so in 4.12 using the legacy mode will continue to work)

In 4.13 we will need to revisit what we want the default to be, since at that point catalogs will start breaking if they try to run in legacy mode in most NSes.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


Description of problem:

 

During ocp multinode spoke cluster creation agent provisioning is stuck on "configuring" because machineConfig service is crashing on the node.
After restarting the service still fails with 

Can't read link "/var/lib/containers/storage/overlay/l/V2OP2CCVMKSOHK2XICC546DUCG" because it does not exist. A storage corruption might have occurred, attempting to recreate the missing symlinks. It might be best wipe the storage to avoid further errors due to storage corruption. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Podman 4.0.2 + 

How reproducible:

sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. deploy multinode spoke (ipxe + boot order )
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 agents in done state and 1 is in "configuring"

 

Expected results:

all agents are in "done" state

Additional info:

issue mentioned in https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/14003

 

Fix: https://github.com/containers/storage/issues/1136

 

 

 

Description:

I was testing the DHCP scenario where only rendezvousIP is specified in the agent-config.yaml and no NMStateConfig is embedded. create-cluster-and-infraenv.service fails on node0 when networkConfig is missing from agent-config.yaml. /etc/assisted/manifests/nmstateconfig.yaml is an empty file.

agent-config.yaml used:

metadata:
name: ostest
namespace: cluster0
spec:
rendezvousIP: 192.168.122.2

Steps to reproduce:

1. Create agent.iso using install-config.yaml and agent-config.yaml
2. Deploy cluster using agent.iso
3. Log into node0 and create-cluster-and-infraenv.service will be displayed as a failed unit.

Expected:

create-cluster-and-infraenv.service in success state

Actual:

create-cluster-and-infraenv.service in failed state

Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 podman[2681]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=info msg="releaseImage version 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-08-04-074610 cpuarch x86_64"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 create-cluster-and-infraenv[2693]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=info msg="Registered cluster with id: 1cc3ea1a-5bbc-4c4d-ad66-6e052800fb0c"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 create-cluster-and-infraenv[2693]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=info msg="Registering infraenv"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 podman[2681]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=info msg="Registered cluster with id: 1cc3ea1a-5bbc-4c4d-ad66-6e052800fb0c"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 podman[2681]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=info msg="Registering infraenv"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 create-cluster-and-infraenv[2693]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=fatal msg="Failed to register infraenv with assisted-service: nmstateconfig should have at least one label set matching the infra-env label selector"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 podman[2681]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=fatal msg="Failed to register infraenv with assisted-service: nmstateconfig should have at least one label set matching the infra-env label selector"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 systemd[1]: create-cluster-and-infraenv.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 systemd[1]: create-cluster-and-infraenv.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 systemd[1]: Failed to start Service that creates initial cluster and infraenv.

/etc/assisted/manifests/nmstateconfig.yaml is an empty file.

[core@control1 ~]$ sudo cat /etc/assisted/manifests/nmstateconfig.yaml
[core@control1 ~]$

Description of problem:

NPE on topology for the ns which just got deleted, see screenshot below

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Login as regular user
2. Create a ns and delete the ns
3. visit the deleted ns in topology

Actual results:

console breaks dur to NPE

Expected results:

console shouldn't break

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1453. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

TargetDown alert fired while it shouldn't.
Prometheus endpoints are not always properly unregistered and the alert will therefore think that some Kube service endpoints are down

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

The problem as always been there.

How reproducible:

Not reproducible.
Most of the time Prometheus endpoints are properly unregistered.
Aim here is to get the TargetDown Prometheus expression be more resilient; this can be tested on past metrics data in which the unregistration issue was encountered.

Steps to Reproduce:

N/A

Actual results:

TargetDown alert triggered while Kube service endpoints are all up & running.

Expected results:

TargetDown alert should not have been trigerred.

Description of problem:

oc-mirror shouldn't clean out the operator versions that are not referenced in the channel anymore

Cu has following ImageSetConfiguration. They are running oc-mirror GitVersion: 4.11.0-2022082035.p0.g3c1c80c.assembly.stream-3c1c80c.

apiVersion: mirror.openshift.io/v1alpha2
kind: ImageSetConfiguration
mirror:
  operators:
    - catalog: registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index:v4.10
      targetName: bit-redhat-operator-catalog-platform-essentials-index
      packages:
        - name: elasticsearch-operator
          channels:
            - name: stable
          minVersion: 5.4.2
        - name: cluster-logging
          channels:
            - name: stable
          minVersion: 5.4.2

This works at first and it makes 5.4.2 available in their internal catalog. However after some time the version 5.4.2 disappears out of their catalog and we get the following error while syncing:

ERRO[0108] Operator elasticsearch-operator was not found, please check name, minVersion, maxVersion, and channels in the config file.
ERRO[0108] Operator cluster-logging was not found, please check name, minVersion, maxVersion, and channels in the config file.

The issue is that the original configured version 5.4.2 is not anymore in the catalog, which we can verify by querying the catalog:

$ oc-mirror list operators --catalog registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index:v4.10 --package elasticsearch-operator --channel stable
WARN[0022] DEPRECATION NOTICE:
Sqlite-based catalogs and their related subcommands are deprecated. Support for
them will be removed in a future release. Please migrate your catalog workflows
to the new file-based catalog format.
VERSIONS
5.5.0

$ oc-mirror list operators --catalog registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index:v4.10 --package elasticsearch-operator --channel stable-5.4
WARN[0019] DEPRECATION NOTICE:
Sqlite-based catalogs and their related subcommands are deprecated. Support for
them will be removed in a future release. Please migrate your catalog workflows
to the new file-based catalog format.
VERSIONS
5.4.4

So,
a) the version 5.4.2 completely disappeard
b) the stable channel now starts with 5.5.0

The oc-mirror would clean out the versions that are not referenced anymore and thus we would assume that 5.4.2 would be cleaned from the mirror. Which they definitely do not want to happen, since they still have that version on clusters in their environment.

It is quite tedious to keep editing the image-set.yaml for all the versions that disappear out of the catalog

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

oc-mirror GitVersion: 4.11.0-2022082035.p0.g3c1c80c.assembly.stream-3c1c80c

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create an ImageSetConfiguration to mirror a particular operator
2. Mirror the operator to mirror registry using oc-mirror
3. The specified version of the operator disappears from the catalog after a few days when there are changes in the channel and start getting the mentioned error on sync.

Actual results:

Operator disappears from the catalog

Expected results:

The mentioned version of the operator to be available in mirror registry even after it's not referenced in the channel

Additional info:


This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3501. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

On clusters serving Route via CRD (i.e. MicroShift), .spec.host values are not automatically assigned during Route creation, as they are on OCP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

$ cat<<EOF | oc apply --server-side -f-
apiVersion: route.openshift.io/v1
kind: Route
metadata:
  name: hello-microshift
spec:
  to:
    kind: Service
    name: hello-microshift
EOF

route.route.openshift.io/hello-microshift serverside-applied

$ oc get route hello-microshift -o yaml

apiVersion: route.openshift.io/v1
kind: Route
metadata:
  annotations:
    openshift.io/host.generated: "true"
  creationTimestamp: "2022-11-11T23:53:33Z"
  generation: 1
  name: hello-microshift
  namespace: default
  resourceVersion: "2659"
  uid: cd35cd20-b3fd-4d50-9912-f34b3935acfd
spec:
  host: hello-microshift-default.cluster.local
  to:
    kind: Service
    name: hello-microshift
  wildcardPolicy: None
 

Expected results:

...
metadata:
  annotations:
    openshift.io/host.generated: "true"
...
spec:
  host: hello-microshift-default.foo.bar.baz
...

Actual results:

Host and host.generated annotation are missing.

Additional info:

** This change will be inert on OCP, which already has the correct behavior. **

 

Failures like:

$ oc login --token=...

Logged into "https://api..." as "..." using the token provided.

Error from server (Timeout): the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get projects.project.openshift.io)

break login, which tries to gather information before saving the configuration, including a giant project list.

Ideally login would be able to save the successful login credentials, even when the informative gathering had difficulties. And possibly the informative gathering could be made conditional (--quiet or similar?) so expensive gathering could be skipped in use-cases where the context was not needed.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4986. The following is the description of the original issue:

We should avoid errors like:

$ oc get -o json clusterversion version | jq -r '.status.history[0].acceptedRisks'
Forced through blocking failures: Precondition "ClusterVersionRecommendedUpdate" failed because of "UnknownUpdate": RetrievedUpdates=True (), so the update from 4.13.0-0.okd-2022-12-11-064650 to 4.13.0-0.okd-2022-12-13-052859 is probably neither recommended nor supported.

Instead, tweak the logic from OCPBUGS-2727, and only append the Forced through blocking failures: prefix when the forcing was required.

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2113973](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113973). The following is the description of the original bug:

If we define a custom scc like this:

allowHostDirVolumePlugin: true
allowHostIPC: false
allowHostNetwork: false
allowHostPID: false
allowHostPorts: false
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
allowPrivilegedContainer: false
allowedCapabilities: []
apiVersion: security.openshift.io/v1
defaultAddCapabilities: []
fsGroup:
type: MustRunAs
groups:

  • system:authenticated
    kind: SecurityContextConstraints
    metadata:
    annotations:
    kubernetes.io/description: MCP Vault Unsealer
    meta.helm.sh/release-name: vault
    meta.helm.sh/release-namespace: mcp-vault
    creationTimestamp: "2022-07-25T11:09:53Z"
    generation: 2
    labels:
    app.kubernetes.io/instance: vault
    app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: Helm
    app.kubernetes.io/name: vault-unsealer
    app.kubernetes.io/version: 3.7.0
    helm.sh/chart: vault-unsealer-3.7.1
    name: vault-unsealer
    resourceVersion: "1793493"
    uid: 6b6d88be-03c0-476d-8602-2e94e4ecfcb5
    priority: null
    readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
    requiredDropCapabilities:
  • KILL
  • MKNOD
  • SETUID
  • SETGID
    runAsUser:
    type: RunAsAny
    seLinuxContext:
    type: MustRunAs
    supplementalGroups:
    type: RunAsAny
    users:
  • system:serviceaccount:mcp-vault:vault-unsealer
    volumes:
  • configMap
  • hostPath
  • secret

we can see that the pod originally has this scc:

oc get pod machine-config-operator-7f57686f5c-g895k -o yaml | grep scc
openshift.io/scc: hostmount-anyuid

After applying the new SCC ( even if we set a higher priority ) the pod is showing after restart:

oc get pod machine-config-operator-7f57686f5c-jg2jv -o yaml | grep scc
openshift.io/scc: vault-unsealer

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3214. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The installer has logic that avoids adding the router CAs to the kubeconfig if the console is not available.  It's not clear why it does this, but it means that the router CAs don't get added when the console is deliberately disabled (it is now an optional capability in 4.12).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Seen in 4.12+4.13

How reproducible:

Always, when starting a cluster w/o the Console capability

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Edit the install-config to set:
capabilities:
  baselineCapabilitySet: None
2. install the cluster
3. check the CAs in the kubeconfig, the wildcard route CA will be missing (compare it w/ a normal cluster)

Actual results:

router CAs missing

Expected results:

router CAs should be present

Additional info:

This needs to be backported to 4.12.

The issue found while testing HOSTEDCP-400 and HOSTEDCP-401.

Hypershift operator installed with flags:

 

--platform-monitoring=operator-only
--enable-uwm-telemetry-remote-write=true
--metrics-set=telemetry

 

Service monitors and pod monitors in the control plane:

 

[jiezhao@cube hypershift]$ oc get servicemonitor -n clusters-jz-test
NAME                                  AGE
catalog-operator                      45m
cluster-version-operator              45m
etcd                                  46m
kube-apiserver                        46m
kube-controller-manager               45m
monitor-multus-admission-controller   43m
monitor-ovn-master-metrics            43m
node-tuning-operator                  45m
olm-operator                          45m
openshift-apiserver                   45m
openshift-controller-manager          45m

[jiezhao@cube hypershift]$ oc get podmonitor -n clusters-jz-test
NAME                              AGE
cluster-image-registry-operator   46m
controlplane-operator             47m
hosted-cluster-config-operator    46m
ignition-server                   47m

 

In OCP management web console, go to Observe->Targets:

 

1. Status of service monitor 'monitor-multus-admission-controller' is Down, error:
   Scraped failed: server returned HTTP status 401 Unauthorized.
   It doesn't have cluster id in target labels
2. Target of pod monitor 'cluster-image-registry-operator' is missing, not shown

 

Description of problem:
Kebab menu for helm repository is showing inconsistent behavior

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.12

How reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create some helm chart repository
2. Go to the Helm page and switch to the repositories tab
3. Open kebab menu for different repos

Actual results:
Menus are overlapping

Expected results:
The menu should work properly; one menu should close before opening a new one

Additional info:
Video has been added for the reference

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4491. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

This is an OCP clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099794

In summary, NetworkManager reports the network as being up before the ipv6 address of the primary interface is ready and crio fails to bind to it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of the problem:

During install, we assume all PVs on a host have been added to a volume group and only remove them if they are. This could let other PVs that are not attached to volume groups persist and prevent coreos from installing properly. 

Relevant assisted installer links:

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/blob/9bec593930995220a2a4550b067f5a186de3b042/src/installer/installer.go#L809 

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/blob/9bec593930995220a2a4550b067f5a186de3b042/src/ops/ops.go#L414

 

Found while investigating triage issue https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-4017 

See slack thread for more details https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C02CP89N4VC/p1663263128420489 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Create a host with a PV w/o a volume group

2. Add host to cluster and install 

3. Observe the install fail

Actual results:

Installation fails with 

"Error: checking for exclusive access to /dev/sda 
Caused by:
| 0: couldn't reread partition table: device is in use |
| 1: EBUSY: Device or resource busy" 

Expected results:

All PVs and VGs are removed so that the installation will succeed

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5466. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

It is possible to change some of the fields in default catalogSource specs and the Marketplace Operator will not revert the changes 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13.0 and back

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a 4.13.0 OpenShift cluster
2. Set the redhat-operator catalogSource.spec.grpcPodConfig.SecurityContextConfig field to `legacy`.

Actual results:

The field remains set to `legacy` mode.

Expected results:

The field is reverted to `restricted` mode.

Additional info:
This code needs to be updated to account for new fields in the catalogSource spec.

 

 

 

Description of problem:

While viewing resource consumption for a specific pod, several graphes are stacked that should not be.  For example cpu/memory limits are a static value and thus should be a static line across a graph. However when viewing the Kubernetes / Compute Resources / Pod Dashboard I see limits are stacked above the usage.  This applies to both CPU and Memory Usage graphs on this dashboard.  When viewing the graph via inspect the visualization seems "fixed".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.11.19

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

At the current version 4.12 Openshift console cannot mix both stacked metrics with unstacked metrics on the same chart. 
The fix is to unstack metrics on charts having some limit markers such as request, limit, etc.
 

Description of problem:

when install private cluster, firstly failed , then need 
ibmcloud is security-group-rule-add "${infra}-sg-kube-api-lb" inbound tcp --port-min 6443 --port-max 6443 --remote $sg 

then openshift-install wait-for  again.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

always

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. try to create cluster with BYON, in install-config.yaml publish: Internal, install failed

Actual results:

firstly time, install failed

Expected results:

Just need install once. need not manually security-group-rule-add. 

Additional info:

https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01U40AM37F/p1664439142279079?thread_ts=1663769891.358229&cid=C01U40AM37F

this issue blocked set up private cluster automatically

 

 

 

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3973. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Upgrade SNO cluster from 4.12 to 4.13, the csi-snapshot-controller is degraded with message (same with log from csi-snapshot-controller-operator): 
E1122 09:02:51.867727       1 base_controller.go:272] StaticResourceController reconciliation failed: ["csi_controller_deployment_pdb.yaml" (string): poddisruptionbudgets.policy "csi-snapshot-controller-pdb" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-storage-operator:csi-snapshot-controller-operator" cannot delete resource "poddisruptionbudgets" in API group "policy" in the namespace "openshift-cluster-storage-operator", "webhook_deployment_pdb.yaml" (string): poddisruptionbudgets.policy "csi-snapshot-webhook-pdb" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-storage-operator:csi-snapshot-controller-operator" cannot delete resource "poddisruptionbudgets" in API group "policy" in the namespace "openshift-cluster-storage-operator"]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-19-191518 to 4.13.0-0.nightly-2022-11-19-182111

How reproducible:

1/1

Steps to Reproduce:

Upgrade SNO cluster from 4.12 to 4.13 

Actual results:

csi-snapshot-controller is degraded

Expected results:

csi-snapshot-controller should be healthy

Additional info:

It also happened on from scratch cluster on 4.13: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.13-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-arm64-single-node/1594946128904720384

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3987. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When the user supplies nmstateConfig in agent-config.yaml invalid configurations may not be detected

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

every time

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create an invalid NM config. In this case an interface was defined with a route but no IP address 
2. The ISO can be generated with no errors
3. At run time the invalid was detected by assisted-service, create-cluster-and-infraenv.service logged the error "failed to validate network yaml for host 0, invalid yaml, error:"
 

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Invalid configuration would be detected when ISO is created

Additional info:

It looks like the ValidateStaticConfigParams check is ONLY done when the nmstateconfig is provided in nmstateconfig.yaml, not when the file is generated (supplied in agent-config.yaml). https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/asset/agent/manifests/nmstateconfig.go#L188

 

 

Description of problem:

We have been investigating an issue with slow kube-apiserver rollout times. When a new revision is created, the current static pod is deleted and a new one created to pick up the revision. There is a 5 min timer on the creation, if this timeout is exceeded the rollout will revert to the previous revision.

The customer has been seeing failed rollouts due to this 5 min timer being exceeded. There is load on the platform cpus with the biggest contributor being exec probe overhead, but there is still significant idle ~ 50%.

While not able to reproduce to the same degree as the customer, I was able to reproduce slow rollout times with a similar platform cpu overhead.

From the logs, we see slow container creation times.

I added some instrumentation to the low_latency_hooks.sh script

snip
pid=$(jq '.pid' /dev/stdin 2>&1)
logger "Start low_latency_hooks ${pid}"
[[ $? -eq 0 && -n "${pid}" ]] || { logger "${0}: Failed to extract the pid: ${pid}"; exit 0; }
snip
if [ "${mode}" = "ro" ]; then
ip netns exec "${ns}" mount -o remount,ro /sys
[ $? -eq 0 ] || exit 1 # Error out so the pod will not start with a writable /sys
fi
logger "Stop low_latency_hooks ${pid}"

Analysing the logs for the five running containers in the apiserver we see that the bulk of the time is being spent in the hook.

insecure-readyz
total container create time: 35s
hook time: 29s

cert-syncer
total container create time: 41s
hook time: 32s

cert-regeneration-controller
total container create time: 73s
hook time: 54s

kube-apiserver
total container create time: 18s
hook time: 16s

check-endpoints
total container create time: 31s
hook time: 31s

I ran another test where I removed the oci hook and kept everything else the same, the results were dramatically different.

Container create times:
insecure-readyz - 1s
cert-syncer - 1s
cert-regeneration-controller - 1s
kube-apiserver -1s
check-endpoints - 5s

I was then able to run the same test in the customers lab. In some joint testing we did with the customer we originally saw 4-5 mins for a rollout. Without the hook in the exact same environment, the total rollout time dropped to <=2 mins.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9.37
Issue likely in later releases as well, have not timed yet

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Force a rollout with a platform cpu load representative of the application
2.
3.

Actual results:
Slow rollout times sometimes exceeding the timeout

Expected results:
Rollout should fit into the timeout window

Additional info:

Description of problem:

When providing the openshift-install agent create command with installconfig + agentconfig manifests that contain the InstallConfig Proxy section, the Proxy configuration does not get configured cluster-wide.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Define InstallConfig with Proxy section
2.openshift-install agent create image
3.Boot ISO
4.Check /etc/assisted/manifests for agent-cluster-install.yaml to contain the Proxy section 

Actual results:

Missing proxy

Expected results:

Proxy should be present and match with the InstallConfig

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2873. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Prometheus fails to scrape metrics from the storage operator after some time.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install storage operator.
2. Wait for 24h (time for the certificate to be recycled).
3.

Actual results:

Targets being down because Prometheus didn't reload the CA certificate.

Expected results:

Prometheus reloads its client TLS certificate and scrapes the target successfully.

Additional info:


This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6213. The following is the description of the original issue:

Please review the following PR: https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3450

The PR has been automatically opened by ART (#aos-art) team automation and indicates
that the image(s) being used downstream for production builds are not consistent
with the images referenced in this component's github repository.

Differences in upstream and downstream builds impact the fidelity of your CI signal.

If you disagree with the content of this PR, please contact @release-artists
in #aos-art to discuss the discrepancy.

Closing this issue without addressing the difference will cause the issue to
be reopened automatically.

Description of problem:

If using ingresscontroller.spec.routeSelector.matchExpressions or ingresscontroller.spec.namespaceSelector.matchExpressions, the route will not count in the new route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard prometheus metric.

This is due to the logic only using "matchLabels". The logic needs to be updated to also use "matchExpressions".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create IC with matchExpressions:
oc apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: operator.openshift.io/v1
kind: IngressController
metadata:
  name: sharded
  namespace: openshift-ingress-operator
spec:
  domain: reproducer.$domain
  routeSelector:
    matchExpressions:
    - key: type
      operator: In
      values:
      - shard
  replicas: 1
  nodePlacement:
    nodeSelector:
      matchLabels:
        node-role.kubernetes.io/worker: ""
EOF

2. Create the route:
oc apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: route.openshift.io/v1
kind: Route
metadata:
  name: route-shard
  labels:
    type: shard
spec:
  to:
    kind: Service
    name: router-shard
EOF

 3. Check route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard{name="sharded"} in prometheus, it's 0 

Actual results:

route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard{name="sharded"} has 0 routes

Expected results:

route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard{name="sharded"} should have 1 route

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5184. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Fail to deploy IPI azure cluster, where set region as westus3, vm type as NV8as_v4. Master node is running from azure portal, but could not ssh login. From serials log, get below error:

[ 3009.547219] amdgpu d1ef:00:00.0: amdgpu: failed to write reg:de0
[ 3011.982399] mlx5_core 6637:00:02.0 enP26167s1: TX timeout detected
[ 3011.987010] mlx5_core 6637:00:02.0 enP26167s1: TX timeout on queue: 0, SQ: 0x170, CQ: 0x84d, SQ Cons: 0x823 SQ Prod: 0x840, usecs since last trans: 2418884000
[ 3011.996946] mlx5_core 6637:00:02.0 enP26167s1: TX timeout on queue: 1, SQ: 0x175, CQ: 0x852, SQ Cons: 0x248c SQ Prod: 0x24a7, usecs since last trans: 2148366000
[ 3012.006980] mlx5_core 6637:00:02.0 enP26167s1: TX timeout on queue: 2, SQ: 0x17a, CQ: 0x857, SQ Cons: 0x44a1 SQ Prod: 0x44c0, usecs since last trans: 2055000000
[ 3012.016936] mlx5_core 6637:00:02.0 enP26167s1: TX timeout on queue: 3, SQ: 0x17f, CQ: 0x85c, SQ Cons: 0x405f SQ Prod: 0x4081, usecs since last trans: 1913890000
[ 3012.026954] mlx5_core 6637:00:02.0 enP26167s1: TX timeout on queue: 4, SQ: 0x184, CQ: 0x861, SQ Cons: 0x39f2 SQ Prod: 0x3a11, usecs since last trans: 2020978000
[ 3012.037208] mlx5_core 6637:00:02.0 enP26167s1: TX timeout on queue: 5, SQ: 0x189, CQ: 0x866, SQ Cons: 0x1784 SQ Prod: 0x17a6, usecs since last trans: 2185513000
[ 3012.047178] mlx5_core 6637:00:02.0 enP26167s1: TX timeout on queue: 6, SQ: 0x18e, CQ: 0x86b, SQ Cons: 0x4c96 SQ Prod: 0x4cb3, usecs since last trans: 2124353000
[ 3012.056893] mlx5_core 6637:00:02.0 enP26167s1: TX timeout on queue: 7, SQ: 0x193, CQ: 0x870, SQ Cons: 0x3bec SQ Prod: 0x3c0f, usecs since last trans: 1855857000
[ 3021.535888] amdgpu d1ef:00:00.0: amdgpu: failed to write reg:e15
[ 3021.545955] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffb57b90159000
[ 3021.550864] PGD 100145067 P4D 100145067 PUD 100146067 PMD 0 

From azure doc https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/nvv4-series , looks like nvv4 series only supports Window VM.

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12 nightly build

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. prepare install-config.yaml, set region as westus3, vm type as NV8as_v4 2. install cluster
3.

Actual results:

installation failed

Expected results:

If nvv4 series is not supported for Linux VM, installer might validate and show the message that such size is not supported.

Additional info:

 

 

 

 

 

Description of problem:

metal3 pod does not come up on SNO when creating Provisioning with provisioningNetwork set to Disabled

The issue is that on SNO, there is no Machine, and no BareMetalHost, it is looking of Machine objects to populate the provisioningMacAddresses field. However, when provisioningNetwork is Disabled, provisioningMacAddresses is not used anyway.

You can work around this issue by populating provisioningMacAddresses with a dummy address, like this:

kind: Provisioning
metadata:
  name: provisioning-configuration
spec:
  provisioningMacAddresses:
  - aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa
  provisioningNetwork: Disabled
  watchAllNamespaces: true

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.17

How reproducible:

Try to bring up Provisioning on SNO in 4.11.17 with provisioningNetwork set to Disabled

apiVersion: metal3.io/v1alpha1
kind: Provisioning
metadata:
  name: provisioning-configuration
spec:
  provisioningNetwork: Disabled
  watchAllNamespaces: true

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

controller/provisioning "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="machines with cluster-api-machine-role=master not found" "name"="provisioning-configuration" "namespace"="" "reconciler group"="metal3.io" "reconciler kind"="Provisioning"

Expected results:

metal3 pod should be deployed

Additional info:

This issue is a result of this change: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/307
See this Slack thread: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CFP6ST0A3/p1670530729168599

Description of problem:

One multus case always fail in QE e2e testing. Using same net-attach-def and pod configure files, testing passed in 4.11 but failed in 4.12 and 4.13

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12 and 4.13

How reproducible:

All the times

Steps to Reproduce:

[weliang@weliang networking]$ oc create -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/weliang1/verification-tests/master/testdata/networking/multus-cni/NetworkAttachmentDefinitions/runtimeconfig-def-ipandmac.yaml
networkattachmentdefinition.k8s.cni.cncf.io/runtimeconfig-def created
[weliang@weliang networking]$ oc get net-attach-def -o yaml
apiVersion: v1
items:
- apiVersion: k8s.cni.cncf.io/v1
  kind: NetworkAttachmentDefinition
  metadata:
    creationTimestamp: "2023-01-03T16:33:03Z"
    generation: 1
    name: runtimeconfig-def
    namespace: test
    resourceVersion: "64139"
    uid: bb26c08f-adbf-477e-97ab-2aa7461e50c4
  spec:
    config: '{ "cniVersion": "0.3.1", "name": "runtimeconfig-def", "plugins": [{ "type":
      "macvlan", "capabilities": { "ips": true }, "mode": "bridge", "ipam": { "type":
      "static" } }, { "type": "tuning", "capabilities": { "mac": true } }] }'
kind: List
metadata:
  resourceVersion: ""
[weliang@weliang networking]$ oc create -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/weliang1/verification-tests/master/testdata/networking/multus-cni/Pods/runtimeconfig-pod-ipandmac.yaml
pod/runtimeconfig-pod created
[weliang@weliang networking]$ oc get pod
NAME                READY   STATUS              RESTARTS   AGE
runtimeconfig-pod   0/1     ContainerCreating   0          6s
[weliang@weliang networking]$ oc describe pod runtimeconfig-pod
Name:         runtimeconfig-pod
Namespace:    test
Priority:     0
Node:         weliang-01031-bvxtz-worker-a-qlwz7.c.openshift-qe.internal/10.0.128.4
Start Time:   Tue, 03 Jan 2023 11:33:45 -0500
Labels:       <none>
Annotations:  k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks: [ { "name": "runtimeconfig-def", "ips": [ "192.168.22.2/24" ], "mac": "CA:FE:C0:FF:EE:00" } ]
              openshift.io/scc: anyuid
Status:       Pending
IP:           
IPs:          <none>
Containers:
  runtimeconfig-pod:
    Container ID:   
    Image:          quay.io/openshifttest/hello-sdn@sha256:c89445416459e7adea9a5a416b3365ed3d74f2491beb904d61dc8d1eb89a72a4
    Image ID:       
    Port:           <none>
    Host Port:      <none>
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       ContainerCreating
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Environment:    <none>
    Mounts:
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-k5zqd (ro)
Conditions:
  Type              Status
  Initialized       True 
  Ready             False 
  ContainersReady   False 
  PodScheduled      True 
Volumes:
  kube-api-access-k5zqd:
    Type:                    Projected (a volume that contains injected data from multiple sources)
    TokenExpirationSeconds:  3607
    ConfigMapName:           kube-root-ca.crt
    ConfigMapOptional:       <nil>
    DownwardAPI:             true
    ConfigMapName:           openshift-service-ca.crt
    ConfigMapOptional:       <nil>
QoS Class:                   BestEffort
Node-Selectors:              <none>
Tolerations:                 node.kubernetes.io/not-ready:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s
                             node.kubernetes.io/unreachable:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age   From               Message
  ----     ------                  ----  ----               -------
  Normal   Scheduled               26s   default-scheduler  Successfully assigned test/runtimeconfig-pod to weliang-01031-bvxtz-worker-a-qlwz7.c.openshift-qe.internal
  Normal   AddedInterface          24s   multus             Add eth0 [10.128.2.115/23] from openshift-sdn
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  23s   kubelet            Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_runtimeconfig-pod_test_7d5f3e7a-846d-4cfb-ac78-fd08b27102ae_0(cff792dbd07e8936d04aad31964bd7b626c19a90eb9d92a67736323a1a2303c4): error adding pod test_runtimeconfig-pod to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): [test/runtimeconfig-pod/7d5f3e7a-846d-4cfb-ac78-fd08b27102ae:runtimeconfig-def]: error adding container to network "runtimeconfig-def": Interface name contains an invalid character /
  Normal   AddedInterface          7s    multus             Add eth0 [10.128.2.116/23] from openshift-sdn
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  7s    kubelet            Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_runtimeconfig-pod_test_7d5f3e7a-846d-4cfb-ac78-fd08b27102ae_0(d2456338fa65847d5dc744dea64972912c10b2a32d3450910b0b81cdc9159ca4): error adding pod test_runtimeconfig-pod to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): [test/runtimeconfig-pod/7d5f3e7a-846d-4cfb-ac78-fd08b27102ae:runtimeconfig-def]: error adding container to network "runtimeconfig-def": Interface name contains an invalid character /
[weliang@weliang networking]$ 
 

Actual results:

Pod is not running

Expected results:

Pod should be in running state

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

There's argument number mismatch on release_vif() call while reverting
port association.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

It's clear in the code, no need to reproduce this.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

TypeError

Expected results:

KuryrPort released

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

$ oc adm must-gather -- gather_ingress_node_firewall
[must-gather      ] OUT Using must-gather plug-in image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:3dec5a08681e11eedcd31f075941b74f777b9187f0e711a498a212f9d96adb2f
When opening a support case, bugzilla, or issue please include the following summary data along with any other requested information:
ClusterID: 0ef60b50-4378-431d-8ca2-faa5af098274
ClusterVersion: Stable at "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-26-111919"
ClusterOperators:
    clusteroperator/insights is not available (Reporting was not allowed: your Red Hat account is not enabled for remote support or your token has expired: UHC services authentication failed
) because Reporting was not allowed: your Red Hat account is not enabled for remote support or your token has expired: UHC services authentication failed[must-gather      ] OUT namespace/openshift-must-gather-fr7kc created
[must-gather      ] OUT clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/must-gather-xx2fh created
[must-gather      ] OUT pod for plug-in image quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:3dec5a08681e11eedcd31f075941b74f777b9187f0e711a498a212f9d96adb2f created
[must-gather-xvfj4] POD 2022-09-28T16:57:00.887445531Z /bin/bash: /usr/bin/gather_ingress_node_firewall: Permission denied
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT waiting for gather to complete
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT downloading gather output
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT receiving incremental file list
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT ./
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT 
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT sent 27 bytes  received 40 bytes  26.80 bytes/sec
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT total size is 0  speedup is 0.00
[must-gather      ] OUT namespace/openshift-must-gather-fr7kc deleted
[must-gather      ] OUT clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/must-gather-xx2fh deleted
Reprinting Cluster State:
When opening a support case, bugzilla, or issue please include the following summary data along with any other requested information:
ClusterID: 0ef60b50-4378-431d-8ca2-faa5af098274
ClusterVersion: Stable at "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-26-111919"
ClusterOperators:
    clusteroperator/insights is not available (Reporting was not allowed: your Red Hat account is not enabled for remote support or your token has expired: UHC services authentication failed
) because Reporting was not allowed: your Red Hat account is not enabled for remote support or your token has expired: UHC services authentication failed

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

When user selects a installed operator (for example, openshift elastic search) in operator hub and navigating to installed operator page from operator information page

with the help of "view it here" option, "404 Not found" information has wrongly shown/appeared although it navigates to the installed operator at the end.

 

Version-Release number of selected components (if applicable):
4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248
How reproducible:

 Always

 

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Login to OCP web console.
  2. Install Operator, For example,OpenShift Elasticsearch Operator- production operators if missing.
  3. Go to the Operator hub and  search for OpenShift Elasticsearch Operator. (make sure Project filter sets to 'All projects')
  4. Click on OpenShift Elasticsearch Operator- production operators.
  5. Click on the link "View it here" from the installed operator section.
  6. View the behavior.

Actual results:

Wrong message "404: Not found" while the user selects an installed operator and navigates from operator hub to installed operator page.

 

Browser console log indicate as below

main-chunk-525818b154a57a9b220a.min.js:1 unhandled error: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'firstElementChild') TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'firstElementChild')
    at c (https://console-openshift-console.apps.jmekkatt-dob.ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com/static/vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:118:125992)
    at HTMLDivElement.l (https://console-openshift-console.apps.jmekkatt-dob.ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com/static/vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:118:126387) TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'firstElementChild')
    at c (vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303:1)
    at HTMLDivElement.l (vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303:1)
window.onerror @ main-chunk-525818b154a57a9b220a.min.js:1
vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'firstElementChild')
    at c (vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303:1)
    at HTMLDivElement.l (vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303:1)
c @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303
l @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:72303
scroll (async)
componentWillUnmount @ vendor-patternfly-core-chunk-006bb1499791fa7cfea7.min.js:38397
hs @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
bs @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
hs @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
bs @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
Oc @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
t.unstable_runWithPriority @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171690
Hi @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
Ac @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
pc @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
(anonymous) @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
t.unstable_runWithPriority @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171690
Hi @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
Vi @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
qi @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
De @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
Yt @ vendors~main-chunk-40fab65853dff2fbc413.min.js:171377
main-chunk-525818b154a57a9b220a.min.js:1          GET https://console-openshift-console.apps.jmekkatt-dob.ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com/api/kubernetes/apis/operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1/clusterserviceversions/elasticsearch-operator.5.5.0 404 (Not Found)
  

Expected results:

Installed operator details should show without any error when the user selects an installed operator and navigates from operator hub to installed operator page.

 

Additional info:

Reproduced in both chrome[103.0.5060.114 (Official Build) (64-bit)] and firefox[91.11.0esr (64-bit)] browsers

Attached screen share for the same issue InstalledOperatorNavigation404.mp4

 Currently controller will set status done each time it sees host that is ready in k8s without looking if it was already set.

time="2022-09-13T19:03:45Z" level=info msg="Found new ready node ocp-2.cluster1.kpsalerno.us.ibm.com with inventory id 2da64d56-5057-78c6-ea6e-bf74a783bd79, kubernetes id 2da64d56-5057-78c6-ea6e-bf74a783bd79, updating its status to Done" func="github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/src/assisted_installer_controller.(*controller).waitAndUpdateNodesStatus" file="/remote-source/app/src/assisted_installer_controller/assisted_installer_controller.go:255" request_id=6258e5a2-4e78-4148-a913-45d704a0fa1d

time="2022-09-13T19:04:05Z" level=info msg="Found new ready node ocp-2.cluster1.kpsalerno.us.ibm.com with inventory id 2da64d56-5057-78c6-ea6e-bf74a783bd79, kubernetes id 2da64d56-5057-78c6-ea6e-bf74a783bd79, updating its status to Done" func="github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/src/assisted_installer_controller.(*controller).waitAndUpdateNodesStatus" file="/remote-source/app/src/assisted_installer_controller/assisted_installer_controller.go:255" request_id=49e4e63f-cf4f-4b9f-b1f3-923c473c09dd

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10807. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Cluster Network Operator managed component multus-admission-controller does not conform to Hypershift control plane expectations.

When CNO is managed by Hypershift, multus-admission-controller and other CNO-managed deployments should run with non-root security context. If Hypershift runs control plane on kubernetes (as opposed to Openshift) management cluster, it adds pod security context to its managed deployments, including CNO, with runAsUser element inside. In such a case CNO should do the same, set security context for its managed deployments, like multus-admission-controller, to meet Hypershift security rules.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create OCP cluster using Hypershift using Kube management cluster
2.Check pod security context of multus-admission-controller

Actual results:

no pod security context is set on multus-admission-controller

Expected results:

pod security context is set with runAsUser: xxxx

Additional info:

Corresponding CNO change 

Catastrophic job runs where high numbers of tests fail are common. There are likely many root causes, but let's try to find one. This is a hard task because it's not "this one test failed, figure out why."

Clusters of failures are more common on certain platforms, it may be fruitful to start with the worst.

NURP's that average > 5 openshift-tests or openshift-tests-upgrade failures:

                      variants                       |          avg           
-----------------------------------------------------+------------------------
 {azure,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-micro,single-node} |   124.5294117647058824
 {azure,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-minor,single-node} |    92.9090909090909091
 {openstack,amd64,ovn,ha}                            |    49.2105263157894737
 {azure,amd64,sdn,ha,fips}                           |    25.6666666666666667
 {metal-ipi,amd64,ovn,ha}                            |    24.6000000000000000
 {openstack,amd64,ovn,ha,fips}                       |    23.5000000000000000
 {azure,amd64,ovn,ha,hypershift}                     |    22.6666666666666667
 {s390x,sdn,ha}                                      |    22.5454545454545455
 {gcp,amd64,ovn,ha}                                  |    21.5714285714285714
 {ppc64le,sdn,ha}                                    |    17.9545454545454545
 {metal-ipi,amd64,sdn,ha}                            |    17.6000000000000000
 {openstack,amd64,ovn,ha,serial}                     |    15.3333333333333333
 {azure,amd64,ovn,ha}                                |    15.1627906976744186
 {promote}                                           |    15.0000000000000000
 {aws,amd64,ovn,ha}                                  |    14.2558139534883721
 {metal-ipi,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-minor,ha}      |    13.9375000000000000
 {gcp,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-minor,ha,realtime}   |    11.2000000000000000
 {azure,amd64,sdn,upgrade,upgrade-minor,ha}          |     9.6842105263157895
 {never-stable}                                      |     9.0740740740740741
 {aws,amd64,ovn,single-node}                         |     8.8666666666666667
 {metal-ipi,amd64,sdn,upgrade,upgrade-micro,ha}      |     7.9090909090909091
 {azure,amd64,sdn,upgrade,upgrade-micro,ha}          |     6.4000000000000000
 {aws,amd64,sdn,ha}                                  |     5.7800000000000000
 {vsphere-ipi,amd64,ovn,ha}                          |     5.6458333333333333
 {openstack,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-minor,ha}      |     5.6250000000000000
 {metal-ipi,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-micro,ha}      |     5.5882352941176471
 {aws,amd64,sdn,upgrade,upgrade-micro,ha}            |     5.5789473684210526

Here's a sippy link for 4.12 job runs with > 50 failures: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/jobs/4.12/runs?filters=%257B%2522items%2522%253A%255B%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522test_failures%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522%253E%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%252250%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522overall_result%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522equals%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522F%2522%257D%255D%252C%2522linkOperator%2522%253A%2522and%2522%257D&sort=desc&sortField=timestamp

Description of problem:

For some reason, some of the packets on a DNS conversation to the {{openshift-dns/dns-default}} service cluster IP don't get properly denatted, i.e. the reply packet has the pod IP as source IP instead of the service IP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.25

How reproducible:

Sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Try to resolve DNS with cluster DNS

Actual results:

DNS timeout. Reply packets have the pod IP instead of the service IP the request was sent to.

Expected results:

DNS working.

Additional info:

I'll elaborate about this in the attachments, but I could find nothing wrong in nbdb or any OVN-Kubernetes or OVN logs that rang a bell.
The only interesting thing I could see was that `conntrack -L` had no reference to this conversation, so it makes kind of sense that the reply packet address is not translated back to the service IP one, but I have not been able to find the reason of this.
The query/response packets can be correlated via DNS transaction ID.

Our Prometheus alerts are inconsistent with both upstream and sometimes our own vendor folder. Let's do a clean update run before the next release is branched off.

We added server groups for control plane and computes as part of OSASINFRA-2570, except for UPI that only creates server group for the control plane.

We need to update the UPI scripts to create server group for computes to be consistent with IPI and have the instruction at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-machineset-osp.html work out of the box in case customers want to create MachineSets on their UPI clusters.

Related to OCPCLOUD-1135.

Description of problem:

With "createFirewallRules: Enabled", after successful "create cluster" and then "destroy cluster", the created firewall-rules in the shared VPC are not deleted.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

$ ./openshift-install version
./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419
built from commit 9eb0224926982cdd6cae53b872326292133e532d
release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc
release architecture amd64

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. try IPI installation with "createFirewallRules: Enabled", which succeeded
2. try destroying the cluster, which succeeded
3. check firewall-rules in the shared VPC 

Actual results:

After destroying the cluster, its firewall-rules created by installer in the shared VPC are not deleted.

Expected results:

Those firewall-rules should be deleted during destroying the cluster.

Additional info:

$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules list --filter='network=installer-shared-vpc'
NAME                                NETWORK               DIRECTION  PRIORITY  ALLOW                                                    
                                                                                                 DENY  DISABLED
ci-op-xpn-ingress-common            installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:6443,tcp:22,tcp:80,tcp:443,icmp                      
                                                                                                       False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-health-checks     installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:6080,tcp:6443,tcp:226
24,tcp:32335                                                                                           False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-internal-network  installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     udp:4789,udp:6081,udp:500,udp:4500,esp,tcp:9000-9999,udp:
9000-9999,tcp:10250,tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:10257,tcp:10259,tcp:22623,tcp:2379-2380        FalseTo show all fields of the firewall, please show in JSON format: --format=json
To show all fields in table format, please see the examples in --help.
$ 
$ yq-3.3.0 r test2/install-config.yaml platform
gcp:
  projectID: openshift-qe  
  region: us-central1
  computeSubnet: installer-shared-vpc-subnet-2
  controlPlaneSubnet: installer-shared-vpc-subnet-1
  createFirewallRules: Enabled
  network: installer-shared-vpc
  networkProjectID: openshift-qe-shared-vpc
$ 
$ yq-3.3.0 r test2/install-config.yaml metadata
creationTimestamp: null
name: jiwei-1013-01
$ 
$ openshift-install create cluster --dir test2
INFO Credentials loaded from file "/home/fedora/.gcp/osServiceAccount.json"
INFO Consuming Install Config from target directory
INFO Creating infrastructure resources...
INFO Waiting up to 20m0s (until 4:06AM) for the Kubernetes API at https://api.jiwei-1013-01.qe.gcp.devcluster.openshift.com:6443...
INFO API v1.24.0+8c7c967 up
INFO Waiting up to 30m0s (until 4:20AM) for bootstrapping to complete...
INFO Destroying the bootstrap resources...
INFO Waiting up to 40m0s (until 4:42AM) for the cluster at https://api.jiwei-1013-01.qe.gcp.devcluster.openshift.com:6443 to initialize...
INFO Checking to see if there is a route at openshift-console/console...
INFO Install complete!
INFO To access the cluster as the system:admin user when using 'oc', run 'export KUBECONFIG=/home/fedora/test2/auth/kubeconfig'
INFO Access the OpenShift web-console here: https://console-openshift-console.apps.jiwei-1013-01.qe.gcp.devcluster.openshift.com
INFO Login to the console with user: "kubeadmin", and password: "wWPkc-8G2Lw-xe2Vw-DgWha"
INFO Time elapsed: 39m14s  
$ 
$ openshift-install destroy cluster --dir test2
INFO Credentials loaded from file "/home/fedora/.gcp/osServiceAccount.json"
INFO Stopped instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-b-pmg5z
INFO Stopped instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-a-csg2j
INFO Stopped instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-1
INFO Stopped instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-2
INFO Stopped instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-0
INFO Deleted 2 recordset(s) in zone qe
INFO Deleted 3 recordset(s) in zone jiwei-1013-01-464st-private-zone
INFO Deleted DNS zone jiwei-1013-01-464st-private-zone
INFO Deleted bucket jiwei-1013-01-464st-image-registry-us-central1-ulgxgjfqxbdnrhd
INFO Deleted instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-0
INFO Deleted instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-a-csg2j
INFO Deleted instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-1
INFO Deleted instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-b-pmg5z
INFO Deleted instance jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-2
INFO Deleted disk jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-2
INFO Deleted disk jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-1
INFO Deleted disk jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-b-pmg5z
INFO Deleted disk jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-0
INFO Deleted disk jiwei-1013-01-464st-worker-a-csg2j
INFO Deleted address jiwei-1013-01-464st-cluster-public-ip
INFO Deleted address jiwei-1013-01-464st-cluster-ip
INFO Deleted forwarding rule a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91
INFO Deleted forwarding rule jiwei-1013-01-464st-api
INFO Deleted forwarding rule jiwei-1013-01-464st-api-internal
INFO Deleted target pool a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91
INFO Deleted target pool jiwei-1013-01-464st-api
INFO Deleted backend service jiwei-1013-01-464st-api-internal
INFO Deleted instance group jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-us-central1-a
INFO Deleted instance group jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-us-central1-c
INFO Deleted instance group jiwei-1013-01-464st-master-us-central1-b
INFO Deleted health check jiwei-1013-01-464st-api-internal
INFO Deleted HTTP health check a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91
INFO Deleted HTTP health check jiwei-1013-01-464st-api
INFO Time elapsed: 4m18s   
$ 
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules list --filter='network=installer-shared-vpc'
NAME                                          NETWORK               DIRECTION  PRIORITY  ALLOW                                                                                                                                                     DENY  DISABLED
ci-op-xpn-ingress-common                      installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:6443,tcp:22,tcp:80,tcp:443,icmp                                                                                                                             False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-health-checks               installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:6080,tcp:6443,tcp:22624,tcp:32335                                                                                           False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-internal-network            installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     udp:4789,udp:6081,udp:500,udp:4500,esp,tcp:9000-9999,udp:9000-9999,tcp:10250,tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:10257,tcp:10259,tcp:22623,tcp:2379-2380        False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-api                       installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:6443                                                                                                                                                        False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-control-plane             installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:22623,tcp:10257,tcp:10259                                                                                                                                   False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-etcd                      installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:2379-2380                                                                                                                                                   False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-health-checks             installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:6080,tcp:6443,tcp:22624                                                                                                                                     False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-cluster          installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:30000-32767,udp:9000-9999,udp:30000-32767,udp:4789,udp:6081,tcp:9000-9999,udp:500,udp:4500,esp,tcp:10250                                                    False
jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-network          installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      icmp,tcp:22                                                                                                                                                     False
k8s-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91-http-hc  installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:30268                                                                                                                                                       False
k8s-fw-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91       installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    1000      tcp:80,tcp:443                                                                                                                                                  FalseTo show all fields of the firewall, please show in JSON format: --format=json
To show all fields in table format, please see the examples in --help.
$ 

FYI manually deleting those firewall-rules in the shared VPC does work.
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-api
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-api].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-control-plane
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-control-plane].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-etcd
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-etcd].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-health-checks
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-health-checks].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-cluster
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-cluster].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-network
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/jiwei-1013-01-464st-internal-network].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q k8s-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91-http-hc
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/k8s-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91-http-hc].
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules delete -q k8s-fw-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91
Deleted [https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/openshift-qe-shared-vpc/global/firewalls/k8s-fw-a516d89f9a4f14bdfb55a525b1a12a91].
$ 
$ gcloud --project openshift-qe-shared-vpc compute firewall-rules list --filter='network=installer-shared-vpc'
NAME                                NETWORK               DIRECTION  PRIORITY  ALLOW                                                                                                                                                     DENY  DISABLED
ci-op-xpn-ingress-common            installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:6443,tcp:22,tcp:80,tcp:443,icmp                                                                                                                             False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-health-checks     installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:6080,tcp:6443,tcp:22624,tcp:32335                                                                                           False
ci-op-xpn-ingress-internal-network  installer-shared-vpc  INGRESS    60000     udp:4789,udp:6081,udp:500,udp:4500,esp,tcp:9000-9999,udp:9000-9999,tcp:10250,tcp:30000-32767,udp:30000-32767,tcp:10257,tcp:10259,tcp:22623,tcp:2379-2380        FalseTo show all fields of the firewall, please show in JSON format: --format=json
To show all fields in table format, please see the examples in --help.
$ 

 

 

 

 

Description of problem:

IPI installation failed with master nodes being NotReady and CCM error "alicloud: unable to split instanceid and region from providerID".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. try IPI installation on alibabacloud, with credentialsMode being "Manual"
2.
3.

Actual results:

Installation failed.

Expected results:

Installation should succeed.

Additional info:

$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version             False       True          34m     Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337: an unknown error has occurred: MultipleErrors
$ 
$ oc get nodes
NAME                           STATUS     ROLES                  AGE   VERSION
jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-0   NotReady   control-plane,master   30m   v1.25.0+3ef6ef3
jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-1   NotReady   control-plane,master   30m   v1.25.0+3ef6ef3
jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-2   NotReady   control-plane,master   30m   v1.25.0+3ef6ef3
$ 

CCM logs:
E1012 03:46:45.223137       1 node_controller.go:147] node-controller "msg"="fail to find ecs" "error"="cloud instance api fail, alicloud: unable to split instanceid and region from providerID, error unexpected providerID="  "providerId"="alicloud://"
E1012 03:46:45.223174       1 controller.go:317] controller/node-controller "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="find ecs: cloud instance api fail, alicloud: unable to split instanceid and region from providerID, error unexpected providerID=" "name"="jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-0" "namespace"="" 

https://mastern-jenkins-csb-openshift-qe.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/ocp-common/job/Flexy-install/145768/ (Finished: FAILURE)
10-12 10:55:15.987  ./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337
10-12 10:55:15.987  built from commit 84aa8222b622dee71185a45f1e0ba038232b114a
10-12 10:55:15.987  release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:41fe173061b00caebb16e2fd11bac19980d569cd933fdb4fab8351cdda14d58e
10-12 10:55:15.987  release architecture amd64

FYI the installation could succeed with 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419:
https://mastern-jenkins-csb-openshift-qe.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/ocp-common/job/Flexy-install/145756/ (Finished: SUCCESS)
10-12 09:59:19.914  ./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419
10-12 09:59:19.914  built from commit 9eb0224926982cdd6cae53b872326292133e532d
10-12 09:59:19.914  release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc
10-12 09:59:19.914  release architecture amd64

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-266. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem: I am working with a customer who uses the web console.  From the Developer Perspective's Project Access tab, they cannot differentiate between users and groups and furthermore cannot add groups from this web console.  This has led to confusion whether existing resources were in fact users or groups, and furthermore they have added users when they intended to add groups instead.  What we really need is a third column in the Project Access tab that says whether a resource is a user or group.

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): This is an issue in OCP 4.10 and 4.11, and I presume future versions as well

How reproducible: Every time.  My customer is running on ROSA, but I have determined this issue to be general to OpenShift.

Steps to Reproduce:

From the oc cli, I create a group and add a user to it.

$ oc adm groups new techlead
group.user.openshift.io/techlead created
$ oc adm groups add-users techlead admin
group.user.openshift.io/techlead added: "admin"
$ oc get groups
NAME                                     USERS
cluster-admins                           
dedicated-admins                         admin
techlead   admin
I create a new namespace so that I can assign a group project level access:

$ oc new-project my-namespace

$ oc adm policy add-role-to-group edit techlead -n my-namespace
I then went to the web console -> Developer perspective -> Project -> Project Access.  I verified the rolebinding named 'edit' is bound to a group named 'techlead'.

$ oc get rolebinding
NAME                                                              ROLE                                   AGE
admin                                                             ClusterRole/admin                      15m
admin-dedicated-admins                                            ClusterRole/admin                      15m
admin-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin                      ClusterRole/admin                      15m
dedicated-admins-project-dedicated-admins                         ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   15m
dedicated-admins-project-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin   ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   15m
edit                                                              ClusterRole/edit                       2m18s
system:deployers                                                  ClusterRole/system:deployer            15m
system:image-builders                                             ClusterRole/system:image-builder       15m
system:image-pullers                                              ClusterRole/system:image-puller        15m

$ oc get rolebinding edit -o yaml
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2022-08-15T14:16:56Z"
  name: edit
  namespace: my-namespace
  resourceVersion: "108357"
  uid: 4abca27d-08e8-43a3-b9d3-d20d5c294bbe
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: ClusterRole
  name: edit
subjects:

  • apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
      kind: Group
      name: techlead
    Now, from the same Project Access tab in the web console, I added the developer with role "View".  From this web console, it is unclear whether developer and techlead are users or groups.

Now back to the CLI, I view the newly created rolebinding named 'developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb', and find that the "View" role is assigned to a user named 'developer', rather than a group.

$ oc get rolebinding                                                                      
NAME                                                              ROLE                                   AGE
admin                                                             ClusterRole/admin                      17m
admin-dedicated-admins                                            ClusterRole/admin                      17m
admin-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin                      ClusterRole/admin                      17m
dedicated-admins-project-dedicated-admins                         ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   17m
dedicated-admins-project-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin   ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   17m
edit                                                              ClusterRole/edit                       4m25s
developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb     ClusterRole/view                       90s
system:deployers                                                  ClusterRole/system:deployer            17m
system:image-builders                                             ClusterRole/system:image-builder       17m
system:image-pullers                                              ClusterRole/system:image-puller        17m
[10:21:21] kechung:~ $ oc get rolebinding developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb -o yaml
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2022-08-15T14:19:51Z"
  name: developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb
  namespace: my-namespace
  resourceVersion: "113298"
  uid: cc2d1b37-922b-4e9b-8e96-bf5e1fa77779
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: ClusterRole
  name: view
subjects:

  • apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
      kind: User
      name: developer

So in conclusion, from the Project Access tab, we're unable to add groups and unable to differentiate between users and groups.  This is in essence our ask for this RFE.

 

Actual results:

Developer perspective -> Project -> Project Access tab shows a list of resources which can be users or groups, but does not differentiate between them.  Furthermore, when we add resources, they are only users and there is no way to add a group from this tab in the web console.

 

Expected results:

Should have the ability to add groups and differentiate between users and groups.  Ideally, we're looking at a third column for user or group.

 

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12854. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11550. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

`cluster-reader` ClusterRole should have ["get", "list", "watch"] permissions for a number of privileged CRs, but lacks them for the API Group "k8s.ovn.org", which includes CRs such as EgressFirewalls, EgressIPs, etc.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10 - 4.12 OVN

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a cluster with OVN components, e.g. EgressFirewall
2. Check permissions of ClusterRole `cluster-reader`

Actual results:

No permissions for OVN resources 

Expected results:

Get, list, and watch verb permissions for OVN resources

Additional info:

Looks like a similar bug was opened for "network-attachment-definitions" in OCPBUGS-6959 (whose closure is being contested).

While backporting to 4.12 the node healthz server (#1570), a number of functions related to checking stale ovs ports (checkForStaleOVSInternalPortscheckForStaleOVSRepresentorInterfacescheckForStaleOVSInterfaces) were moved to pkg/node/openflow_manager.go and their related tests were left in pkg/node/healthcheck_test.go. In 4.13, we have everything under pkg/network-controller-manager. To keep consistency, let's move these to pkg/node/node.go and pkg/node/node_test.go

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3253. The following is the description of the original issue:

It is very easy to accidentally use the traditional openshift-install wait-for <x>-complete commands instead of the equivalent openshift-install agent wait-for <x>-complete command. This will work in some stages of the install, but show much less information or fail altogether in other stages of the install.
If we can detect from the asset store that this was an agent-based install, we should issue a warning if the user uses the old command.

When a HostedCluster is configured as `Private`, annotate the necessary hosted CP components (API and OAuth) so that External DNS can still create public DNS records (pointing to private IP resources).

The External DNS record should be pointing to the resource for the PrivateLink VPC Endpoint. "We need to specify the IP of the A record. We can do that with a cluster IP service."

Context: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1675432805760719

Create a script that gathers debug information from a host running the agent ISO and exports it in a standard format so that we can ask customers to provide it for debugging when something has gone wrong (and also use it in CI).

For now, it is fine to require the user to ssh into the host to run the script. The script should be already in place inside the agent ISO.

The output should probably be a compressed tar file. That file could be saved locally, or potentially piped to stdout so that a user only has to run a command like: ssh node0 -c agent-gather >node0.tgz

Things we need to collect:

  • systemctl status and journal for each of the systemd services created by the agent installer (ideally this should be determined programmatically so we can't forget to add any)
  • network information: ifconfig; ip -j -p addr
  • Data supplied by the agent installer in /etc/assisted/*
  • /etc/containers/registries.conf
  • /etc/assisted-service/node0 (if it exists)
  • /usr/local/share/assisted-service/*.env

Description of problem:

When log line number is too big, the number will overlap with cut-off line in the log viewer.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Go to a pod log page with lots of logs, such as pod in openshift-cluster-version namespace. Check log line numbers.
2.
3.

Actual results:

1. When line number is too big, it will overlap with cut-off line.

Expected results:

1. Should have no overlaps in logs

Additional info: