Back to index

4.12.22

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.58

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

This includes ibm-vpc-node-label-updater!

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

There is a new driver release 5.0.0 since the last rebase that includes snapshot support:

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/releases/tag/v5.0.0

Rebase the driver on v5.0.0 and update the deployments in ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator.
There are no corresponding changes in ibm-vpc-node-label-updater since the last rebase.

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The End of General support for vSphere 6.7 will be on October 15, 2022. So, vSphere 6.7 will be deprecated for 4.11.

We want to encourage vSphere customers to upgrade to vSphere 7 in OCP 4.11 since VMware is EOLing (general support) for vSphere 6.7 in Oct 2022.

We want the cluster Upgradeable=false + have a strong alert pointing to our docs / requirements.

related slack: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CH06KMDRV/p1647541493096729

Epic Goal

  • Enable the migration from a storage intree driver to a CSI based driver with minimal impact to the end user, applications and cluster
  • These migrations would include, but are not limited to:
    • CSI driver for AWS EBS
    • CSI driver for GCP
    • CSI driver for Azure (file and disk)
    • CSI driver for VMware vSphere

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

This Epic tracks the GA of this feature

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OC mirror is GA product as of Openshift 4.11 .

The goal of this feature is to solve any future customer request for new features or capabilities in OC mirror 

Epic Goal

  • Mirror to mirror operations and custom mirroring flows required by IBM CloudPak catalog management

Why is this important?

  • IBM needs additional customization around the actual mirroring of images to enable CloudPaks to fully adopt OLM-style operator packaging and catalog management
  • IBM CloudPaks introduce additional compute architectures, increasing the download volume by 2/3rds to day, we need the ability to effectively filter non-required image versions of OLM operator catalogs during filtering for other customers that only require a single or a subset of the available image architectures
  • IBM CloudPaks regularly run on older OCP versions like 4.8 which require additional work to be able to read the mirrored catalog produced by oc mirror

Scenarios

  1. Customers can use the oc utility and delegate the actual image mirror step to another tool
  2. Customers can mirror between disconnected registries using the oc utility
  3. The oc utility supports filtering manifest lists in the context of multi-arch images according to the sparse manifest list proposal in the distribution spec

Acceptance Criteria

  • Customers can use the oc utility to mirror between two different air-gapped environments
  • Customers can specify the desired computer architectures and oc mirror will create sparse manifest lists in the target registry as a result

Dependencies (internal and external)

Previous Work:

  1. WRKLDS-369
  2. Disconnected Mirroring Improvement Proposal

Related Work:

  1. https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/pull/310
  2. https://github.com/distribution/distribution/pull/3536
  3. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10ozLoV7sVPLB8msLx4LYamooQDSW-CAnLiNiJ9SER2k/edit?usp=sharing

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

Overview 

HyperShift came to life to serve multiple goals, some are main near-term, some are secondary that serve well long-term. 

Main Goals for hosted control planes (HyperShift)

  • Optimize OpenShift for Cost/footprint/ which improves our competitive stance against the *KSes
  • Establish separation of concerns which makes it more resilient for SRE to manage their workload clusters (be it security, configuration management, etc).
  • Simplify and enhance multi-cluster management experience especially since multi-cluster is becoming an industry need nowadays. 

Secondary Goals

HyperShift opens up doors to penetrate the market. HyperShift enables true hybrid (CP and Workers decoupled, mixed IaaS, mixed Arch,...). An architecture that opens up more options to target new opportunities in the cloud space. For more details on this one check: Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

 

Hosted Control Planes (HyperShift) Map 

To bring hosted control planes to our customers, we need the means to ship it. Today MCE is how HyperShift shipped, and installed so that customers can use it. There are two main customers for hosted-control-planes: 

 

  • Self-managed: In that case, Red Hat would provide hosted control planes as a service that is managed and SREed by the customer for their tenants (hence “self”-managed). In this management model, our external customers are the direct consumers of the multi-cluster control plane as a servie. Once MCE is installed, they can start to self-service dedicated control planes. 

 

  • Managed: This is OpenShift as a managed service, today we only “manage” the CP, and share the responsibility for other system components, more info here. To reduce management costs incurred by service delivery organizations which translates to operating profit (by reducing variable costs per control-plane), as well as to improve user experience, lower platform overhead (allow customers to focus mostly on writing applications and not concern themselves with infrastructure artifacts), and improve the cluster provisioning experience. HyperShift is shipped via MCE, and delivered to Red Hat managed SREs (same consumption route). However, for managed services, additional tooling needs to be refactored to support the new provisioning path. Furthermore, unlike self-managed where customers are free to bring their own observability stack, Red Hat managed SREs need to observe the managed fleet to ensure compliance with SLOs/SLIs/…

 

If you have noticed, MCE is the delivery mechanism for both management models. The difference between managed and self-managed is the consumer persona. For self-managed, it's the customer SRE for managed its the RH SRE

High-level Requirements

For us to ship HyperShift in the product (as hosted control planes) in either management model, there is a necessary readiness checklist that we need to satisfy. Below are the high-level requirements needed before GA: 

 

  • Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story (with MCE)
  • Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption  
  • Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components.  
  • Hosted control planes has an HA and a DR story
  • Hosted control planes is in parity with top-level add-on operators 
  • Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption
  • Hosted control planes is observable  
  • HyperShift as a backend to managed services is fully unblocked.

 

Please also have a look at our What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness? doc. 

Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story

Multi-cluster is becoming an industry need today not because this is where trend is going but because it’s the only viable path today to solve for many of our customer’s use-cases. Below is some reasoning why multi-cluster is a NEED:

 

 

As a result, multi-cluster management is a defining category in the market where Red Hat plays a key role. Today Red Hat solves for multi-cluster via RHACM and MCE. The goal is to simplify fleet management complexity by providing a single pane of glass to observe, secure, police, govern, configure a fleet. I.e., the operand is no longer one cluster but a set, a fleet of clusters. 

HyperShift logically centralized architecture, as well as native separation of concerns and superior cluster lifecyle management experience, makes it a great fit as the foundation of our multi-cluster management story. 

Thus the following stories are important for HyperShift: 

  • When lifecycling OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported providers from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to use a consistent UI so I can manage and operate (observe, govern,...) a fleet of clusters.
  • I want to specify HA constraints (e.g., deploy my clusters in different regions) while ensuring acceptable QoS (e.g., latency boundaries) to ensure/reduce any potential downtime for my workloads. 
  • When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported provider from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to backup any critical data so I am able to restore them in case of hosting service cluster (management cluster) failure. 

Refs:

Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption.

 

HyperShift is the core engine that will be used to provide hosted control-planes for consumption in managed and self-managed. 

 

Main user story:  When life cycling clusters as a cluster service consumer via HyperShift core APIs, I want to use a stable/backward compatible API that is less susceptible to future changes so I can provide availability guarantees. 

 

Ref: What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness?

Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components. 

 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumptions

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

HyperShift - proposed cuts from data plane

HyperShift has an HA and a DR story

When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin) I want to be able to migrate CPs from one hosting service cluster to another:

  • as means for disaster recovery in the case of total failure
  • so that scaling pressures on a management cluster can be mitigated or a management cluster can be decommissioned.

More information: 

 

Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption

To understand usage patterns and inform our decision making for the product. We need to be able to measure adoption and assess usage.

See Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

Hosted control plane is observable  

Whether it's managed or self-managed, it’s pertinent to report health metrics to be able to create meaningful Service Level Objectives (SLOs), alert of failure to meet our availability guarantees. This is especially important for our managed services path. 

HyperShift is in parity with top-level add-on operators

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-8901 

Unblock HyperShift as a backend to managed services

HyperShift for managed services is a strategic company goal as it improves usability, feature, and cost competitiveness against other managed solutions, and because managed services/consumption-based cloud services is where we see the market growing (customers are looking to delegate platform overhead). 

 

We should make sure our SD milestones are unblocked by the core team. 

 

Note 

This feature reflects HyperShift core readiness to be consumed. When all related EPICs and stories in this EPIC are complete HyperShift can be considered ready to be consumed in GA form. This does not describe a date but rather the readiness of core HyperShift to be consumed in GA form NOT the GA itself.

- GA date for self-managed will be factoring in other inputs such as adoption, customer interest/commitment, and other factors. 
- GA dates for ROSA-HyperShift are on track, tracked in milestones M1-7 (have a look at https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-5771

Epic Goal*

The goal is to split client certificate trust chains from the global Hypershift root CA.

 
Why is this important? (mandatory)

This is important to:

  • assure a workload can be run on any kind of OCP flavor
  • reduce the blast radius in case of a sensitive material leak
  • separate trust to allow more granular control over client certificate authentication

 
Scenarios (mandatory) 

Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

  1. I would like to be able to run my workloads on any OpenShift-like platform.
    My workloads allow components to authenticate using client certificates based
    on a trust bundle that I am able to retrieve from the cluster.
  1. I don't want my users to have access to any CA bundle that would allow them
    to trust a random certificate from the cluster for client certificate authentication.

 
Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

Hypershift team needs to provide us with code reviews and merge the changes we are to deliver

Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

  • Development - OpenShift Auth, Hypershift
  • Documentation -OpenShift Auth Docs team
  • QE - OpenShift Auth QE
  • PX - I have no idea what PX is
  • Others - others

Acceptance Criteria (optional)

The serviceaccount CA bundle automatically injected to all pods cannot be used to authenticate any client certificate generated by the control-plane.

Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

Risk: there is a throbbing time pressure as this should be delivered before first stable Hypershift release

Done - Checklist (mandatory)

  • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
  • Documentation - Content development is complete.
  • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
  • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
  • Engineering Stories Merged
  • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
  • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

Feature Overview  

Much like core OpenShift operators, a standardized flow exists for OLM-managed operators to interact with the cluster in a specific way to leverage AWS STS authorization when using AWS APIs as opposed to insecure static, long-lived credentials. OLM-managed operators can implement integration with the CloudCredentialOperator in well-defined way to support this flow.

Goals:

Enable customers to easily leverage OpenShift's capabilities around AWS STS with layered products, for increased security posture. Enable OLM-managed operators to implement support for this in well-defined pattern.

Requirements:

  • CCO gets a new mode in which it can reconcile STS credential request for OLM-managed operators
  • A standardized flow is leveraged to guide users in discovering and preparing their AWS IAM policies and roles with permissions that are required for OLM-managed operators 
  • A standardized flow is defined in which users can configure OLM-managed operators to leverage AWS STS
  • An example operator is used to demonstrate the end2end functionality
  • Clear instructions and documentation for operator development teams to implement the required interaction with the CloudCredentialOperator to support this flow

Use Cases:

See Operators & STS slide deck.

 

Out of Scope:

  • handling OLM-managed operator updates in which AWS IAM permission requirements might change from one version to another (which requires user awareness and intervention)

 

Background:

The CloudCredentialsOperator already provides a powerful API for OpenShift's cluster core operator to request credentials and acquire them via short-lived tokens. This capability should be expanded to OLM-managed operators, specifically to Red Hat layered products that interact with AWS APIs. The process today is cumbersome to none-existent based on the operator in question and seen as an adoption blocker of OpenShift on AWS.

 

Customer Considerations

This is particularly important for ROSA customers. Customers are expected to be asked to pre-create the required IAM roles outside of OpenShift, which is deemed acceptable.

Documentation Considerations

  • Internal documentation needs to exists to guide Red Hat operator developer teams on the requirements and proposed implementation of integration with CCO and the proposed flow
  • External documentation needs to exist to guide users on:
    • how to become aware that the cluster is in STS mode
    • how to become aware of operators that support STS and the proposed CCO flow
    • how to become aware of the IAM permissions requirements of these operators
    • how to configure an operator in the proposed flow to interact with CCO

Interoperability Considerations

  • this needs to work with ROSA
  • this needs to work with self-managed OCP on AWS

Market Problem

This Section: High-Level description of the Market Problem ie: Executive Summary

  • As a customer of OpenShift layered products, I need to be able to fluidly, reliably and consistently install and use OpenShift layered product Kubernetes Operators into my ROSA STS clusters, while keeping a STS workflow throughout.
  •  
  • As a customer of OpenShift on the big cloud providers, overall I expect OpenShift as a platform to function equally well with tokenized cloud auth as it does with "mint-mode" IAM credentials. I expect the same from the Kubernetes Operators under the Red Hat brand (that need to reach cloud APIs) in that tokenized workflows are equally integrated and workable as with "mint-mode" IAM credentials.
  •  
  • As the managed services, including Hypershift teams, offering a downstream opinionated, supported and managed lifecycle of OpenShift (in the forms of ROSA, ARO, OSD on GCP, Hypershift, etc), the OpenShift platform should have as close as possible, native integration with core platform operators when clusters use tokenized cloud auth, driving the use of layered products.
  • .
  • As the Hypershift team, where the only credential mode for clusters/customers is STS (on AWS) , the Red Hat branded Operators that must reach the AWS API, should be enabled to work with STS credentials in a consistent, and automated fashion that allows customer to use those operators as easily as possible, driving the use of layered products.

Why it Matters

  • Adding consistent, automated layered product integrations to OpenShift would provide great added value to OpenShift as a platform, and its downstream offerings in Managed Cloud Services and related offerings.
  • Enabling Kuberenetes Operators (at first, Red Hat ones) on OpenShift for the "big3" cloud providers is a key differentiation and security requirement that our customers have been and continue to demand.
  • HyperShift is an STS-only architecture, which means that if our layered offerings via Operators cannot easily work with STS, then it would be blocking us from our broad product adoption goals.

Illustrative User Stories or Scenarios

  1. Main success scenario - high-level user story
    1. customer creates a ROSA STS or Hypershift cluster (AWS)
    2. customer wants basic (table-stakes) features such as AWS EFS or RHODS or Logging
    3. customer sees necessary tasks for preparing for the operator in OperatorHub from their cluster
    4. customer prepares AWS IAM/STS roles/policies in anticipation of the Operator they want, using what they get from OperatorHub
    5. customer's provides a very minimal set of parameters (AWS ARN of role(s) with policy) to the Operator's OperatorHub page
    6. The cluster can automatically setup the Operator, using the provided tokenized credentials and the Operator functions as expected
    7. Cluster and Operator upgrades are taken into account and automated
    8. The above steps 1-7 should apply similarly for Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure Cloud, with their respective token-based workload identity systems.
  2. Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
    1. The same as above, but the ROSA CLI would assist with AWS role/policy management
    2. The same as above, but the oc CLI would assist with cloud role/policy management (per respective cloud provider for the cluster)
  3. ...

Expected Outcomes

This Section: Articulates and defines the value proposition from a users point of view

  • See SDE-1868 as an example of what is needed, including design proposed, for current-day ROSA STS and by extension Hypershift.
  • Further research is required to accomodate the AWS STS equivalent systems of GCP and Azure
  • Order of priority at this time is
    • 1. AWS STS for ROSA and ROSA via HyperShift
    • 2. Microsoft Azure for ARO
    • 3. Google Cloud for OpenShift Dedicated on GCP

Effect

This Section: Effect is the expected outcome within the market. There are two dimensions of outcomes; growth or retention. This represents part of the “why” statement for a feature.

  • Growth is the acquisition of net new usage of the platform. This can be new workloads not previously able to be supported, new markets not previously considered, or new end users not previously served.
  • Retention is maintaining and expanding existing use of the platform. This can be more effective use of tools, competitive pressures, and ease of use improvements.
  • Both of growth and retention are the effect of this effort.
    • Customers have strict requirements around using only token-based cloud credential systems for workloads in their cloud accounts, which include OpenShift clusters in all forms.
      • We gain new customers from both those that have waited for token-based auth/auth from OpenShift and from those that are new to OpenShift, with strict requirements around cloud account access
      • We retain customers that are going thru both cloud-native and hybrid-cloud journeys that all inevitably see security requirements driving them towards token-based auth/auth.
      •  

References

As an engineer I want the capability to implement CI test cases that run at different intervals, be it daily, weekly so as to ensure downstream operators that are dependent on certain capabilities are not negatively impacted if changes in systems CCO interacts with change behavior.

Acceptance Criteria:

Create a stubbed out e2e test path in CCO and matching e2e calling code in release such that there exists a path to tests that verify working in an AWS STS workflow.

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

We plan to build Ironic Container Images using RHEL9 as base image in OCP 4.12

This is required because the ironic components have abandoned support for CentOS Stream 8 and Python 3.6/3.7 upstream during the most recent development cycle that will produce the stable Zed release, in favor of CentOS Stream 9 and Python 3.8/3.9

More info on RHEL8 to RHEL9 transition in OCP can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N8KyDY7KmgUYA9EOtDDQolebz0qi3nhT20IOn4D-xS4

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a SRE, I want hypershift operator to expose a metric when hosted control plane is ready. 

This should allow SRE to tune (or silence) alerts occurring while the hosted control plane is spinning up. 

 

 

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The Kube APIServer has a sidecar to output audit logs. We need similar sidecars for other APIServers that run on the control plane side. We also need to pass the same audit log policy that we pass to the KAS to these other API servers.

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Place holder epic to track spontaneous task which does not deserve its own epic.

DoD:

At the moment if the input etcd kms encryption (key and role) is invalid we fail transparently.

We should check that both key and role are compatible/operational for a given cluster and fail in a condition otherwise

AWS has a hard limit of 100 OIDC providers globally. 
Currently each HostedCluster created by e2e creates its own OIDC provider, which results in hitting the quota limit frequently and causing the tests to fail as a result.

 
DOD:
Only a single OIDC provider should be created and shared between all e2e HostedClusters. 

AC:

We have connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs flag in konnectiviy socks5 proxy to dial directly to cloud providers without going through konnectivity.

This introduce another path for exception https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1722

We should consolidate both by keep using connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs until there's a reason to not.

 

Once the HostedCluster and NodePool gets stopped using PausedUntil statement, the awsprivatelink controller will continue reconciling.

 

How to test this:

  • Deploy a private cluster
  • Put it in pause once deployed
  • Delete the AWSEndPointService and the Service from the HCP namespace
  • And wait for a reconciliation, the result it's that they should not be recreated
  • Unpause it and wait for recreation.

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem? 

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb  

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)   

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7780. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

4.9 and 4.10 oc calls to oc adm upgrade channel ... for 4.11+ clusters would clear spec.capabilities. Not all that many clusters try to restrict capabilities, but folks will need to bump their channel for at least every other minor (if their using EUS channels), and while we recommend folks use an oc from the 4.y they're heading towards, we don't have anything in place to enforce that.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.9 and 4.10 oc are exposed vs. the new-in-4.11 spec.capabilities. Newer oc could theoretically be exposed vs. any new ClusterVersion spec capabilities.

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a 4.11+ cluster with None capabilities.
2. Set the channel with a 4.10.51 oc, like oc adm upgrade channel fast-4.11.
3. Check the capabilities with oc get -o json clusterversion version | jq -c .spec.capabilities.

Actual results:

null

Expected results:

{"baselineCapabilitySet":"None"}

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3253. The following is the description of the original issue:

It is very easy to accidentally use the traditional openshift-install wait-for <x>-complete commands instead of the equivalent openshift-install agent wait-for <x>-complete command. This will work in some stages of the install, but show much less information or fail altogether in other stages of the install.
If we can detect from the asset store that this was an agent-based install, we should issue a warning if the user uses the old command.

I haven't gone back to pin down all affected versions, but I wouldn't be surprised if we've had this exposure for a while. On a 4.12.0-ec.2 cluster, we have:

cluster:usage:resources:sum{resource="podnetworkconnectivitychecks.controlplane.operator.openshift.io"}

currently clocking in around 67983. I've gathered a dump with:

$ oc --as system:admin -n openshift-network-diagnostics get podnetworkconnectivitychecks.controlplane.operator.openshift.io | gzip >checks.gz

And many, many of these reference nodes which no longer exist (the cluster is aggressively autoscaled, with nodes coming and going all the time). We should fix garbage collection on this resource, to avoid consuming excessive amounts of memory in the Kube API server and etcd as they attempt to list the large resource set.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12722. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12165. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

While updating a cluster to 4.12.11, which contains the bug fix for [OCPBUGS-7999|https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-7999] (which is the 4.12.z backport of [OCPBUGS-2783|https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2783], it seems that the older {{{Custom|Default}RouteSync{Degraded|Progressing}}} conditions are not cleaned up as they should, as per [OCPBUGS-2783|https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2783] resolution, while the newer ones are added.

Due to this, on an upgrade to 4.12.11 (or higher, until this bug is fixed), it is possible to hit a problem very similar to the one that lead to [OCPBUGS-2783|https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2783] in the first place, but while upgrading to 4.12.11.

So, we need to do a proper cleanup of the older conditions.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.11 and higher

How reproducible:

Always in what regards the wrong conditions. It only leads to issues if one of the wrong conditions was in unhealthy state.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Upgrade
2.
3.

Actual results:

Both new (and correct) conditions plus older (and wrong) conditions.

Expected results:

Both new (and correct) conditions only.

Additional info:

Problem seems to be that the stale conditions controller is created[1] with a list that says {{CustomRouteSync}} and {{DefaultRouteSync}}, while that list should be {{CustomRouteSyncDegraded}}, {{CustomRouteSyncProgressing}}, {{DefaultRouteSyncDegraded}} and {{DefaultRouteSyncProgressing}}. I read the source code of the controller a bit and it seems that it does not admit prefixes but performs a literal comparison.

[1] - https://github.com/openshift/console-operator/blob/0b54727/pkg/console/starter/starter.go#L403-L404

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13970. The following is the description of the original issue:

if the kubeadmin secret was deleted successfully from the guest cluster, but the `SecretHashAnnotation` annotation deletion on the oauthDeployment failed, the annotation will not be reconciled again and the annotation will never be removed.

context: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1684765042825929

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3027. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When running the console in development mode per https://github.com/openshift/console#frontend-development, metrics do not load on the cluster overview, pods list page, pod details page (Metrics tab is missing), etc.

Samuel Padgett suspects the changes in https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/0bd839da219462ea585183de1c856fb60e9f96fb are related.

Name: DNS
Description: Please change the "DNS" component to be a subcomponent "DNS" of the "Networking" component.

Component: change to "Networking".
Subcomponent: change to "DNS".

Existing fields (default assignee, default QA contact, default CC email list, etc.) should remain the same as they currently are.
Default Assignee: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Default QA Contact: hongli@redhat.com
Default CC List: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Additional Notes:
I filled in "Default CC email list" because the form validation would not permit me to omit it. However, it can be left empty in Bugzilla (it is currently empty).

If possible, we would like this change to be done prior to the Bugzilla-to-Jira migration to avoid the need to make the change after the migration.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5548. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
This is a follow-up on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 and https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390

When creating a Deployment, DeploymentConfig, or Knative Service with enabled Pipeline, and then deleting it again with the enabled option "Delete other resources created by console" (only available on 4.13+ with the PR above) the automatically created Pipeline is not deleted.

When the user tries to create the same resource with a Pipeline again this fails with an error:

An error occurred
secrets "nodeinfo-generic-webhook-secret" already exists

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.13

(we might want to backport this together with https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390 and OCPBUGS-5547)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install OpenShift Pipelines operator (tested with 1.8.2)
  2. Create a new project
  3. Navigate to Add > Import from git and create an application
  4. Case 1: In the topology select the new resource and delete it
  5. Case 2: In the topology select the application group and delete the complete app

Actual results:
Case 1: Delete resources:

  1. Deployment (tries it twice!) $name
  2. Service $name
  3. Route $name
  4. ImageStream $name

Case 2: Delete application:

  1. Deployment (just once) $name
  2. Service $name
  3. Route $name
  4. ImageStream $name

Expected results:
Case 1: Delete resource:

  1. Delete Deployment $name should be called just once
  2. (Keep this deletion) Service $name
  3. (Keep this deletion) Route $name
  4. (Keep this deletion) ImageStream $name
  5. Missing deletion of the Tekton Pipeline $name
  6. Missing deletion of the Tekton TriggerTemplate with generated name trigger-template-$name-$random
  7. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret
  8. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

Case 2: Delete application:

  1. (Keep this deletion) Deployment $name
  2. (Keep this deletion) Service $name
  3. (Keep this deletion) Route $name
  4. (Keep this deletion) ImageStream $name
  5. Missing deletion of the Tekton Pipeline $name
  6. Missing deletion of the Tekton TriggerTemplate with generated name trigger-template-$name-$random
  7. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret
  8. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5346. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The vSphere status health item is misleading.

More info: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CUPJTHQ5P/p1672829660214369

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Have OCP 4.12 on vSphere
2. On the Cluster Dashboard (landing page), check the vSphere Status Health (static plugin)
3.

Actual results:

The icon shows pregress but nothing is progressing when the modal dialog is open

Expected results:

No misleading message and icon are rendered.

Additional info:

Since the Problem detector is not a reliable source and modification of the HealthItem in the OCP Console is too complex task for the recent state of release, a non-misleading text is good-enough.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7617. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Azure Disk volume is taking time to attach/detach
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift ARO 4.10.30
How reproducible:

While performing scaledown and scaleup of statefulset pod takes time to attach and detach volume from nodes.

Reviewed must-gather and test output will share my findings in comments.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11636. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The ACLs are disabled for all newly created s3 buckets, this causes all OCP installs to fail: the bootstrap ignition can not be uploaded:

level=info msg=Creating infrastructure resources...
level=error
level=error msg=Error: error creating S3 bucket ACL for yunjiang-acl413-4dnhx-bootstrap: AccessControlListNotSupported: The bucket does not allow ACLs
level=error msg=	status code: 400, request id: HTB2HSH6XDG0Q3ZA, host id: V6CrEgbc6eyfJkUbLXLxuK4/0IC5hWCVKEc1RVonSbGpKAP1RWB8gcl5dfyKjbrLctVlY5MG2E4=
level=error
level=error msg=  with aws_s3_bucket_acl.ignition,
level=error msg=  on main.tf line 62, in resource "aws_s3_bucket_acl" "ignition":
level=error msg=  62: resource "aws_s3_bucket_acl" ignition {
level=error
level=error msg=failed to fetch Cluster: failed to generate asset "Cluster": failure applying terraform for "bootstrap" stage: failed to create cluster: failed to apply Terraform: exit status 1
level=error
level=error msg=Error: error creating S3 bucket ACL for yunjiang-acl413-4dnhx-bootstrap: AccessControlListNotSupported: The bucket does not allow ACLs
level=error msg=	status code: 400, request id: HTB2HSH6XDG0Q3ZA, host id: V6CrEgbc6eyfJkUbLXLxuK4/0IC5hWCVKEc1RVonSbGpKAP1RWB8gcl5dfyKjbrLctVlY5MG2E4=
level=error
level=error msg=  with aws_s3_bucket_acl.ignition,
level=error msg=  on main.tf line 62, in resource "aws_s3_bucket_acl" "ignition":
level=error msg=  62: resource "aws_s3_bucket_acl" ignition {


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11+
 

How reproducible:

Always
 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create a cluster via IPI

Actual results:

install fail
 

Expected results:

install succeed
 

Additional info:

Heads-Up: Amazon S3 Security Changes Are Coming in April of 2023 - https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/heads-up-amazon-s3-security-changes-are-coming-in-april-of-2023/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/object-ownership-error-responses.html - After you apply the bucket owner enforced setting for Object Ownership, ACLs are disabled.

 

Description of problem:

During restart egress firewall acls will be deleted and re-created from scratch, meaning that egress firewall rules won't be applied for some time during restart

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5523. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

catalog pod restarting frequently  after one stack trace daily.          ~~~                                                                          $ omc logs catalog-operator-f7477865d-x6frl -p
2023-01-04T13:05:15.175952229Z time="2023-01-04T13:05:15Z" level=info msg=syncing event=update reconciling="*v1alpha1.Subscription" selflink=
2023-01-04T13:05:15.175952229Z fatal error: concurrent map read and map write
2023-01-04T13:05:15.178587884Z
2023-01-04T13:05:15.178674833Z goroutine 669 [running]:
2023-01-04T13:05:15.179284556Z runtime.throw({0x1efdc12, 0xc000580000})
2023-01-04T13:05:15.179458107Z 	/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:1198 +0x71 fp=0xc00559d098 sp=0xc00559d068 pc=0x43bcd1
2023-01-04T13:05:15.179707701Z runtime.mapaccess1_faststr(0x7f39283dd878, 0x10, {0xc000894c40, 0xf})
2023-01-04T13:05:15.179932520Z 	/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/map_faststr.go:21 +0x3a5 fp=0xc00559d100 sp=0xc00559d098 pc=0x418ca5
2023-01-04T13:05:15.180181245Z github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/metrics.UpdateSubsSyncCounterStorage(0xc00545cfc0)       ~~~

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

Slack discussion: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C3VS0LV41/p1673120541153639                            MG link - https://attachments.access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/cases/03396604/attachments/25f23643-2447-442b-ba26-4338b679b8cc?usePresignedUrl=true

 

Description of problem:

4.2 AWS boot images such as ami-01e7fdcb66157b224 include the old ignition.platform.id=ec2 kernel command line parameter. When launched against 4.12.0-rc.3, new machines fail with:

  1. The old user-data and old AMI successfully get to the machine-config-server request stage.
  2. The new instance will then request the full Ignition from /config/worker , and the machine-config server translates that to the old Ignition v2 spec format.
  3. The instance will lay down that Ignition-formatted content, and then try and reboot into the new state.
  4. Coming back up in the new state, the modern Afterburn comes up to try and figure out a node name for the kubelet, and this fails with unknown provider 'ec2'.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

coreos-assemblers used ignition.platform.id=ec2, but pivoted to =aws here. It's not clear when that made its way into new AWS boot images. Some time after 4.2 and before 4.6.

Afterburn dropped support for legacy command-line options like the ec2 slug in 5.0.0. But it's not clear when that shipped into RHCOS. The release controller points at this RHCOS diff, but that has afterburn-0-5.3.0-1 builds on both sides.

How reproducible:

100%, given a sufficiently old AMI and a sufficiently new OpenShift release target.

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install 4.12.0-rc.3 or similar new OpenShift on AWS in us-east-1.
  2. Create Ignition v2 user-data in a Secret in openshift-machine-api. I'm fuzzy on how to do that portion easily, since it's basically RFE-3001 backwards.
  3. Edit a compute MachineSet to set spec.template.spec.providerSpec.value.ami to id: ami-01e7fdcb66157b224 and also point it at your v2 user-data Secret.
  4. Possibly delete an existing Machine in that MachineSet, or raise replicas, or otherwise talk the MachineSet controller into provisioning a new Machine to pick up the reconfigured AMI.

Actual results:

The new Machine will get to Provisioned but fail to progress to Running. systemd journal logs will include unknown provider 'ec2' for Afterburn units.

Expected results:

Old boot-image AMIs can successfully update to 4.12.

Alternatively, we pin down the set of exposed boot images sufficiently that users with older clusters can audit for exposure and avoid the issue by updating to more modern boot images (although updating boot images is not trivial, see RFE-3001 and the Ignition spec 2 to 3 transition discussed in kcs#5514051.

Description of the problem:

Noticed there were no thread IDs in the assisted-installer logs when debugging 240 node cluster deployment with MCE (slack thread) making it difficult to debug.

How reproducible: 100%

 

Steps to reproduce:

1. Create cluster using assisted service and start the install 

2. Look at the assisted-installer logs 

Actual results:

Logs look like

time="2022-07-14T16:17:31Z" level=info msg="Start complete installation step, with params success: true, error info: " 

Expected results: Thread ID would also print so we can understand which thread it came from


Adding setReportCaller to true will also help

Description of problem:

The user mirrored the 4.11.0 release and attempted to use it to generate the the installation ISO in a completely disconnected environment.

When it was the turn for extracting the os image from machine-os-images, the agent based installer ran : oc adm release info --image-for=machine-os-images --insecure=true quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:300bce8246cf880e792e106607925de0a404484637627edf5f517375517d54a4 --registry-config=/tmp/registry-config1141450352

This does not include the --icsp-file, and thus the image reference can be retrieved to perform the extraction.

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

https://github.com/openshift/installer/releases/tag/agent-installer-v4.11.0-dev-preview-2

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Mirroring the images of 4.11.0 using oc adm mirror command to the local registry.
2. Created install-config.yaml with mirror config
3. Created agent-config.yaml 
4. openshift-install-sep1 agent create image --dir kni-22

 

Actual results:

INFO[0001] Start configuring static network for 3 hosts  pkg=manifests
INFO[0002] Adding NMConnection file <bond0.nmconnection>  pkg=manifests
INFO[0002] Adding NMConnection file <eno49.nmconnection>  pkg=manifests
INFO[0002] Adding NMConnection file <eno50.nmconnection>  pkg=manifests
INFO[0003] Adding NMConnection file <bond0.nmconnection>  pkg=manifests
INFO[0003] Adding NMConnection file <eno49.nmconnection>  pkg=manifests
INFO[0003] Adding NMConnection file <eno50.nmconnection>  pkg=manifests
INFO[0004] Adding NMConnection file <bond0.nmconnection>  pkg=manifests
INFO[0004] Adding NMConnection file <eno49.nmconnection>  pkg=manifests
INFO[0004] Adding NMConnection file <eno50.nmconnection>  pkg=manifests
DEBUG   Fetching BaseIso Image...
DEBUG     Fetching Agent Manifests...
DEBUG     Reusing previously-fetched Agent Manifests
DEBUG     Fetching Install Config...
DEBUG     Reusing previously-fetched Install Config
DEBUG     Fetching Mirror Registries Config...
DEBUG     Reusing previously-fetched Mirror Registries Config
DEBUG   Generating BaseIso Image...
INFO[0004] Extracting base ISO from release payload
ERRO[0014] command 'oc adm release info --image-for=machine-os-images --insecure=true quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:300bce8246cf880e792e106607925de0a404484637627edf5f517375517d54a4 --registry-config=/tmp/registry-config1141450352' exited with non-zero exit code 1:
error: unable to read image quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:300bce8246cf880e792e106607925de0a404484637627edf5f517375517d54a4: Get "http://quay.io/v2/": dial tcp: lookup quay.io on 10.92.86.56:53: server misbehaving
WARN[0014] Failed to extract base ISO from release payload - check registry configuration
INFO[0014] Downloading base ISO
DEBUG Obtaining RHCOS image file from 'https://rhcos.mirror.openshift.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.11/411.86.202207150124-0/x86_64/rhcos-411.86.202207150124-0-live.x86_64.iso'
ERROR failed to write asset (Agent Installer ISO) to disk: image reader not available
FATAL failed to fetch Agent Installer ISO: failed to fetch dependency of "Agent Installer ISO": failed to generate asset "BaseIso Image": failed to get base ISO image: command 'oc adm release info --image-for=machine-os-images --insecure=true quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:300bce8246cf880e792e106607925de0a404484637627edf5f517375517d54a4 --registry-config=/tmp/registry-config1141450352' exited with non-zero exit code 1:
FATAL error: unable to read image quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:300bce8246cf880e792e106607925de0a404484637627edf5f517375517d54a4: Get "http://quay.io/v2/": dial tcp: lookup quay.io on 10.92.86.56:53: server misbehaving
FATAL

Expected results:

Image correctly generated

Additional info:

Host OS: RHEL 8.4
NMstate version: nmstate-1.0.2-5.el8.noarch

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14180. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14082. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Since the `registry.centos.org` is closed, all the unit tests in oc relying on this registry started failing. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

all versions

How reproducible:

trigger CI jobs and see unit tests are failing

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3441. The following is the description of the original issue:

Update the cluster-authentication-operator to not go degraded when it can’t determine the console url.  This risks masking certain cases where we would want to raise an error to the admin, but the expectation is that this failure mode is rare.

Risk could be avoided by looking at ClusterVersion's enabledCapabilities to decide if missing Console was expected or not (unclear if the risk is high enough to be worth this amount of effort).

AC: Update the cluster-authentication-operator to not go degraded when console config CRD is missing and ClusterVersion config has Console in enabledCapabilities.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3501. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

On clusters serving Route via CRD (i.e. MicroShift), .spec.host values are not automatically assigned during Route creation, as they are on OCP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

$ cat<<EOF | oc apply --server-side -f-
apiVersion: route.openshift.io/v1
kind: Route
metadata:
  name: hello-microshift
spec:
  to:
    kind: Service
    name: hello-microshift
EOF

route.route.openshift.io/hello-microshift serverside-applied

$ oc get route hello-microshift -o yaml

apiVersion: route.openshift.io/v1
kind: Route
metadata:
  annotations:
    openshift.io/host.generated: "true"
  creationTimestamp: "2022-11-11T23:53:33Z"
  generation: 1
  name: hello-microshift
  namespace: default
  resourceVersion: "2659"
  uid: cd35cd20-b3fd-4d50-9912-f34b3935acfd
spec:
  host: hello-microshift-default.cluster.local
  to:
    kind: Service
    name: hello-microshift
  wildcardPolicy: None
 

Expected results:

...
metadata:
  annotations:
    openshift.io/host.generated: "true"
...
spec:
  host: hello-microshift-default.foo.bar.baz
...

Actual results:

Host and host.generated annotation are missing.

Additional info:

** This change will be inert on OCP, which already has the correct behavior. **

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3164. The following is the description of the original issue:

During first bootstrap boot we need crio and kubelet on the disk, so we start release-image-pivot systemd task. However, its not blocking bootkube, so these two run in parallel.

release-image-pivot restarts the node to apply new OS image, which may leave bootkube in an inconsistent state. This task should run before bootkube

In multinode we can check nodes object in kubeapi as we can't really validate hosts that are not part of cluster, only the one controller is running on.

And we should validate ip of the host controller is running on.

In case ip was changed log it

Description of problem:
Pipeline Repository (Pipeline-as-code) list never shows an Event type.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9+

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install Pipelines Operator and setup a Pipeline-as-code repository
  2. Trigger an event and a build

Actual results:
Pipeline Repository list shows a column Event type but no value.

Expected results:
Pipeline Repository list should show the Event type from the matching Pipeline Run.

Similar to the Pipeline Run Details page based on the label.

Additional info:
The list page packages/pipelines-plugin/src/components/repository/list-page/RepositoryRow.tsx renders obj.metadata.namespace as event type.

I believe we should show the Pipeline Run event type instead. packages/pipelines-plugin/src/components/repository/RepositoryLinkList.tsx uses

{plrLabels[RepositoryLabels[RepositoryFields.EVENT_TYPE]]}

to render it.

Also the Pipeline Repository details page tried to render the Branch and Event type from the Repository resource. My research says these properties doesn't exist on the Repository resource. The code should be removed from the Repository details page.

Description of problem:

Agent based installation fails during the 3+1 deployment. I found that the machine-api-operator degraded due to minimum worker replica count is 2 and for 3+1 deployment we need to define one worker node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create agent.iso (openshift-install agent create image) using install-config.yaml and agent-config.yaml (PFA sample files)
2. Deploy a 3+1 cluster using agent.iso
3. Execute "openshift-install agent wait-for install-complete" command to wait for install complete. 

Actual results:

Getting below error:
ERROR Cluster operator kube-controller-manager Degraded is True with GarbageCollector_Error: GarbageCollectorDegraded: error fetching rules: Get "https://thanos-querier.openshift-monitoring.svc:9091/api/v1/rules": dial tcp: lookup thanos-querier.openshift-monitoring.svc on 172.30.0.10:53: no such host 
INFO Cluster operator machine-api Progressing is True with SyncingResources: Progressing towards operator: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337 
ERROR Cluster operator machine-api Degraded is True with SyncingFailed: Failed when progressing towards operator: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337 because minimum worker replica count (2) not yet met: current running replicas 1, waiting for [] 
INFO Cluster operator machine-api Available is False with Initializing: Operator is initializing 
INFO Cluster operator monitoring Available is False with UpdatingPrometheusOperatorFailed: Rollout of the monitoring stack failed and is degraded. Please investigate the degraded status error. 
ERROR Cluster operator monitoring Degraded is True with UpdatingPrometheusOperatorFailed: Failed to rollout the stack. Error: updating prometheus operator: reconciling Prometheus Operator Admission Webhook Deployment failed: updating Deployment object failed: waiting for DeploymentRollout of openshift-monitoring/prometheus-operator-admission-webhook: got 1 unavailable replicas 
INFO Cluster operator monitoring Progressing is True with RollOutInProgress: Rolling out the stack. 
INFO Cluster operator network ManagementStateDegraded is False with :  
ERROR Cluster initialization failed because one or more operators are not functioning properly. 
ERROR 				The cluster should be accessible for troubleshooting as detailed in the documentation linked below, 
ERROR 				https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/support/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-installations.html 

Expected results:

3+1 deployment should be successful.

Additional info:

I found that there is a condition in the machine-api-operator to check that the worker node count should be 2 which is preventing the 3+1 deployment.
https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/blob/master/pkg/operator/sync.go#L322 

Derrick got an "old and new refs are equal" on rebase error; this is similar to OCPBUGS-1899 but I think has a different root cause. In this case, when a manual rollback is performed via the bootloader, we've computed that there's an osimageurl diff between the expected and desired state, but actually the desired state is already set.

We just need to skip doing the rebase if we're already in the target state.

(A real root of this problem again is that the whole "current/desired config" thing is trying to track state independently of the bootloader...if we made node state == container image, all of that goes away. The MCO would understand that it got booted into a previous state)

Description of problem:

Custom manifest files can be placed in the /openshift folder so that they will be applied during cluster installation.
Anyhow, if a file contains more than one manifests, all but the first are ignored.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create the following custom manifest file in the /openshift folder:

```
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:  
  name: agent-test  
  namespace: openshift-config
data:  
  value: agent-test
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata: 
name: agent-test-2
namespace: openshift-config
data: 
  value: agent-test-2
```
2. Create the agent ISO image and deploy a cluster

Actual results:

ConfigMap agent-test-2 does not exist in the openshift-config namespace

Expected results:

ConfigMap agent-test-2 must exist in the openshift-config namespace

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4955. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Customer needs "IfNotPresent" ImagePullPolicy set for bundle unpacker images which reference iamges by digest. Currently, policy is set to "Always" no matter what.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Install an operator via bundle referencing an image by digest
2.Check the bundle unpacker pod

Actual results:

Image pull policy will be set to "Always"

Expected results:

Image pull policy will be set to "IfNotPresent" when pulling via digest

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Clusters created with platform 'vsphere' in the install-config end up as type 'BareMetal' in the infrastructure CR.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.3

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a cluster through the agent installer with platform: vsphere in the install-config
2. oc get infrastructure cluster -o jsonpath='{.status.platform}' 

Actual results:

BareMetal

Expected results:

VSphere

Additional info:

The platform type is not being case converted ("vsphere" -> "VSphere") when constructing the AgentClusterInstall CR. When read by the assisted-service client, the platform reads as unknown and therefore the platform field is left blank when the Cluster object is created in the assisted API. Presumably that results in the correct default platform for the topology: None for SNO, BareMetal for everything else, but never VSphere. Since the platform VIPs are passed through a non-platform-specific API in assisted, everything worked but the resulting cluster would have the BareMetal platform.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8741. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5889. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Customer running a cluster with following config:
4.10.23
AWS/IPI
OVNKubernetes

Observed that in namespace with networkpolicy rules enabled, and a policy for allow-from-same namespace, pods will have different behaviors when calling service IP's hosted in that same namespace.

Example:
Deployment1 with two pods (A/B) exists in namespace <EXAMPLE>
Deployment2 with 1 pod hosting a service and route exists in same namespace
Pod A will unexpectedly stop being able to call service IP of deployment2; Pod B will never lose access to calling service IP of deployment2.

Pod A remains able to call out through br-ex interface, tag the ROUTE address, and reach deployment2 pod via haproxy (this never breaks)

Pod A remains able to reach the local gateway on the node

Host node for Pod A is able to reach the service IP of deployment2 and remains able to do so, even while pod A is impacted.

Issue can be mitigated by applying a label or annotation to pod A, which immediately allows it to reach internal service IPs again within the namespace.

I suspect that the issue is to do with the networkpolicy rules failing to stay updated on the pod object, and the pod needs to be 'refreshed' --> label appendation/other update, to force the pod to 'remember' that it is allowed to call peers within the namespace.

Additional relevant data:
- pods affects throughout cluster; no specific project/service/deployment/application
- pods ride on different nodes all the time (no one node affected)
- pods with fail condition are on same node with other pods without issue
- multiple namespaces see this problem
- all namespaces are using similar networkpolicy isolation and allow-from-same-namespace ruleset (which matches our documentation on syntax).



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.23

How reproducible:

every time --> unclear what the trigger is that causes this; pods will be functional and several hours/days later, will stop being able to talk to peer services.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. deploy pod with at least two replicas in a namespace with allow-from same network policy
2. deploy a different service and route example httpd instance in same namespace
3. observe that one of the two pods may fail to reach service IP after some time
4. apply annotation to pod and it is immediately able to reach services again.

Actual results:

pods intermittently fail to reach internal service addresses, but are able to be interacted with otherwise, and can reach upstream/external addresses including routes on cluster. 

Expected results:

pods should not lose access to service network peers. 

Additional info:

see next comments for relevant uploads/sosreports and inspects.

Tracker issue for bootimage bump in 4.12. This issue should block issues which need a bootimage bump to fix.

The previous bump was OCPBUGS-5960.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4973. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Config OAuth with htpasswd in the hostedcluster doesn't work as expected.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

enable OAuth htpasswd in hostedcluster

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create passwd file for user init by htpasswd
```
htpasswd -cbB .passwd helitest helitest

oc create secret generic testuser --from-file=htpasswd=.passwd  -n clusters ``` 

2. edit hostedcluster.yaml
```
spec:
  configuration:
    oauth:
      identityProviders:
      - htpasswd:
          fileData:
            name: testuser
        mappingMethod: claim
        name: htpasswd
        type: HTPasswd
```
3. oc login hostedcluster apiserver

$ oc login https://ac0be21b169ff4399b6a2044388c38cf-5789e1b174d7424b.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com:6443 --username=testuser --password=testuser
The server uses a certificate signed by an unknown authority.
You can bypass the certificate check, but any data you send to the server could be intercepted by others.
Use insecure connections? (y/n): y


Login failed (401 Unauthorized) 

Actual results:

oc login with error : "Login failed (401 Unauthorized) "

Expected results:

oc login successfully.

Additional info:

# check configmap of oauth 
$ oc get cm -n clusters-demo-02 oauth-openshift -oyaml
...
    oauthConfig:
      alwaysShowProviderSelection: false
      assetPublicURL: ""
      grantConfig:
        method: deny
        serviceAccountMethod: prompt
      identityProviders: []
      loginURL: https://ac0be21b169ff4399b6a2044388c38cf-5789e1b174d7424b.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com:6443
      
---> seems `identityProviders` is not synced correctly ? 

Description of the problem:

assisted-installer-controller Job does not apply Additional Root CA Trust Bundle

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/issues/513

How reproducible:

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/issues/513

Steps to reproduce:

1.  Create cluster with proxy and additional certificate bundle

2.Install

Actual results:

Controller failed to reach service cause of self signed certificate

Expected results:

Installation succeeds

Description of problem:

oc --context build02 get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.12.0-ec.1   True        False         45h     Error while reconciling 4.12.0-ec.1: the cluster operator kube-controller-manager is degraded

oc --context build02 get co kube-controller-manager
NAME                      VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
kube-controller-manager   4.12.0-ec.1   True        False         True       2y87d   GarbageCollectorDegraded: error fetching rules: Get "https://thanos-querier.openshift-monitoring.svc:9091/api/v1/rules": dial tcp 172.30.153.28:9091: connect: cannot assign requested address

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

build02 is a build farm cluster in CI production.
I can provide credentials to access the cluster if needed.

Description of problem:

The default catalogSources are not being ran in restricted mode.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create an 4.12 openshift cluster
2. Check the securityContextConfig for the default catalogSources

Actual results:

$ k get catsrc  -n openshift-marketplace -o yaml | grep securityContextConfig
    securityContextConfig: legacy
    securityContextConfig: legacy
    securityContextConfig: legacy
    securityContextConfig: legacy

Expected results:

$ k get catsrc  -n openshift-marketplace -o yaml | grep securityContextConfig
      securityContextConfig: restricted
      securityContextConfig: restricted
      securityContextConfig: restricted
      securityContextConfig: restricted

Additional info:

 

 

 

 

Description of problem:

This a bug record to pin down dependencies version in CMO release 4.12 after the release-4.12 branch was detached from master branch.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

N/A

Steps to Reproduce:

N/A

Actual results:

N/A

Expected results:

N/A

Additional info:

None.

Description of problem:

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.

2.

3.

 

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

Please fill in the following template while reporting a bug and provide as much relevant information as possible. Doing so will give us the best chance to find a prompt resolution.

Affected Platforms:

Is it an

  1. internal CI failure 
  2. customer issue / SD
  3. internal RedHat testing failure

 

If it is an internal RedHat testing failure:

  • Please share a kubeconfig or creds to a live cluster for the assignee to debug/troubleshoot along with reproducer steps (specially if it's a telco use case like ICNI, secondary bridges or BM+kubevirt).

 

If it is a CI failure:

 

  • Did it happen in different CI lanes? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
  • Did it happen in both sdn and ovn jobs? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
  • Did it happen in other platforms (e.g. aws, azure, gcp, baremetal etc) ? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
  • When did the failure start happening? Please provide the UTC timestamp of the networking outage window from a sample failure run
  • If it's a connectivity issue,
  • What is the srcNode, srcIP and srcNamespace and srcPodName?
  • What is the dstNode, dstIP and dstNamespace and dstPodName?
  • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)

 

If it is a customer / SD issue:

 

  • Provide enough information in the bug description that Engineering doesn’t need to read the entire case history.
  • Don’t presume that Engineering has access to Salesforce.
  • Please provide must-gather and sos-report with an exact link to the comment in the support case with the attachment.  The format should be: https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/#/case/<case number>/discussion?attachmentId=<attachment id>
  • Describe what each attachment is intended to demonstrate (failed pods, log errors, OVS issues, etc).  
  • Referring to the attached must-gather, sosreport or other attachment, please provide the following details:
    • If the issue is in a customer namespace then provide a namespace inspect.
    • If it is a connectivity issue:
      • What is the srcNode, srcNamespace, srcPodName and srcPodIP?
      • What is the dstNode, dstNamespace, dstPodName and  dstPodIP?
      • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
      • Please provide the UTC timestamp networking outage window from must-gather
      • Please provide tcpdump pcaps taken during the outage filtered based on the above provided src/dst IPs
    • If it is not a connectivity issue:
      • Describe the steps taken so far to analyze the logs from networking components (cluster-network-operator, OVNK, SDN, openvswitch, ovs-configure etc) and the actual component where the issue was seen based on the attached must-gather. Please attach snippets of relevant logs around the window when problem has happened if any.
  • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has been identified, label with “sbr-triaged”
  • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has not been identified and needs Engineering help for root cause, labels with “sbr-untriaged”
  • Note: bugs that do not meet these minimum standards will be closed with label “SDN-Jira-template”

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1428. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When using an OperatorGroup attached to a service account, AND if there is a secret present in the namespace, the operator installation will fail with the message:
the service account does not have any API secret sa=testx-ns/testx-sa
This issue seems similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094303 - which was resolved in 4.11.0 - however, the new element now, is that the presence of a secret in the namespace  is causing the issue.
The name of the secret seems significant - suggesting something somewhere is depending on the order that secrets are listed in. For example, If the secret in the namespace is called "asecret", the problem does not occur. If it is called "zsecret", the problem always occurs.
"zsecret" is not a "kubernetes.io/service-account-token". The issue I have raised here relates to Opaque secrets - zsecret is an Opaque secret. The issue may apply to other types of secrets, but specifically my issue is that when there is an opaque secret present in the namespace, the operator install fails as described. I aught to be allowed to have an opaque secret present in the namespace where I am installing the operator.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0 & 4.11.1

How reproducible:

100% reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create namespace: oc new-project testx-ns
2. oc apply -f api-secret-issue.yaml

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

API YAML:

cat api-secret-issue.yaml 
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
  name: zsecret
  namespace: testx-ns
  annotations:
   kubernetes.io/service-account.name: testx-sa
type: Opaque
stringData:
  mykey: mypass

apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
  name: testx-sa
  namespace: testx-ns

kind: OperatorGroup
apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1
metadata:
  name: testx-og
  namespace: testx-ns
spec:
  serviceAccountName: "testx-sa"
  targetNamespaces:
  - testx-ns

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
  name: testx-role
  namespace: testx-ns
rules:

  • apiGroups: ["*"]
      resources: ["*"]
      verbs: ["*"] 
      

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  name: testx-rolebinding
  namespace: testx-ns
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: Role
  name: testx-role
subjects:

  • kind: ServiceAccount
      name: testx-sa
      namespace: testx-ns

apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: Subscription
metadata:
  name: etcd-operator
  namespace: testx-ns
spec:
  channel: singlenamespace-alpha
  installPlanApproval: Automatic
  name: etcd
  source: community-operators
  sourceNamespace: openshift-marketplace

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7438. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The egress service nodeSelector parsing does
not take into account wrong values that cause
errors (such as "name part must consist of alphanumeric characters"),
and the controller does not handle them gracefully given a bad input.
when a bad input is given it should log an error and ignore the service

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

create an egress service with a bad nodeSelector:
"{"nodeSelector":{"matchLabels":{"a:b": "c&"}}}"

ovnkube-master controller does not handle it gracefully

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11257. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-9964. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

egressip cannot be assigned on hypershift hosted cluster node

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13.0-0.nightly-2023-03-09-162945

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. setup hypershift env


2. lable egress ip node on hosted cluster
% oc get node
NAME                                         STATUS   ROLES    AGE     VERSION
ip-10-0-129-175.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker   3h20m   v1.26.2+bc894ae
ip-10-0-129-244.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker   3h20m   v1.26.2+bc894ae
ip-10-0-141-41.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker   3h20m   v1.26.2+bc894ae
ip-10-0-142-54.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker   3h20m   v1.26.2+bc894ae

% oc label node/ip-10-0-129-175.us-east-2.compute.internal k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable=""
node/ip-10-0-129-175.us-east-2.compute.internal labeled
% oc label node/ip-10-0-129-244.us-east-2.compute.internal k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable=""
node/ip-10-0-129-244.us-east-2.compute.internal labeled
% oc label node/ip-10-0-141-41.us-east-2.compute.internal k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable=""
node/ip-10-0-141-41.us-east-2.compute.internal labeled
% oc label node/ip-10-0-142-54.us-east-2.compute.internal  k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable=""
node/ip-10-0-142-54.us-east-2.compute.internal labeled


3. create egressip
% cat egressip.yaml 
apiVersion: k8s.ovn.org/v1
kind: EgressIP
metadata:
  name: egressip-1
spec:
  egressIPs: [ "10.0.129.180" ]
  namespaceSelector:
    matchLabels:
      env: ovn-tests
% oc apply -f egressip.yaml 
egressip.k8s.ovn.org/egressip-1 created


4. check egressip assignment
             

Actual results:

egressip cannot assigned to node
% oc get egressip NAME         EGRESSIPS      ASSIGNED NODE   ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS egressip-1   10.0.129.180 

Expected results:

egressip can be assigned to one of the hosted cluster node

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

When using the agent based instller to zero-touch provision the cluster. If the network bandwidth is low, and the assisted-service or the assisted-service fails to pull the docker image within the timeout. The create-cluster-and-infraenv, apply-host-config, and start-cluster-installation services will be deactivated due to dependency failed. The process will be blocked, and require enable & start the service manually.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openshift-install 4.11.0
built from commit 863cd1ea823559116e26de327705ed72ccdede8f
release image quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:300bce8246cf880e792e106607925de0a404484637627edf5f517375517d54a4
release architecture amd64

How reproducible:

Install Openshift with agent based installer with local mirror.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Stop the local registry or limit the network bandwidth to make assisted-service-pod.service or assisted-service.service fails to started within the 90s timeout.
2.Start the local registry or mannully pull the image on the node0. 3.

Actual results:

When using the agent based instller to zero-touch pprovision  the cluster. If the network bandwidth is low, and the assisted-service or the assisted-service fails to pull the docker image within the timeout. The create-cluster-and-infraenv, apply-host-config, and start-cluster-installation services will be deactivated due to dependency failed. The process will be blocked, and require enable & start the service manually.

Expected results:

Provision start after the assisted-service started.

Additional info:

Given:
assisted-service-pod.service requires assisted-service-db.service assisted-service.service
assisted-service.service BindsTo=assisted-service-pod.service
create-cluster-and-infraenv.service Requires=assisted-service.service and PartOf=assisted-service-pod.service
apply-host-config.service Requires=create-cluster-and-infraenv.service
start-cluster-installation.service Requires=apply-host-config.service
Requires= "Configures requirement dependencies on other units. If this unit gets activated, the units listed here will be activated as well. If one of the other units gets deactivated or its activation fails, this unit will be deactivated."When assisted-service-pod.service starts, assisted-service-db.service and assisted-service.service also be started,
Once assisted-service-pod.service fails to be started, assisted-service.service also fail to be started due to "BindsTo=assisted-service-pod.service".
Then dependency failed for create-cluster-and-infraenv.service due to Requires=assisted-service.service which activation fails, Therefore it will be deactived.
Then dependency failed for apply-host-config.service, due to Requires=create-cluster-and-infraenv.service which activation fails, Therefore it will be deactived.
Then dependency failed for start-cluster-installation.service, due to Requires=apply-host-config.service which activation fails, Therefore it will be deactived.Then assisted-service-pod.service restarts, assisted-service.service and assisted-service-db.service restarts as well, since they are binded to assisted-service-pod.service.
However, create-cluster-and-infraenv.service apply-host-config.service and start-cluster-installation.service was be deactivated, they requires to be activate mannully.Eventually, assisted-service started and hang with waitting for create infraenv. The provisioning is blocked.

Description of problem:
OpenShift installer hits error when missing a topology section inside of a failureDomain like this in install-config.yaml:

    - name: us-east-1
      region: us-east
      zone: us-east-1a
    - name: us-east-2
      region: us-east
      zone: us-east-2a
      topology:
        computeCluster: /IBMCloud/host/vcs-mdcnc-workload-2
        networks:
        - ci-segment-154
        datastore: workload_share_vcsmdcncworkload2_vyC6a

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Build from latest master (4.12)

How reproducible:

Each time

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create install-config.yaml for vsphere multi-zone
2. Leave out a topology section (under failureDomains)
3. Attempt to create cluster

Actual results:

FATAL failed to fetch Terraform Variables: failed to fetch dependency of "Terraform Variables": failed to generate asset "Platform Provisioning Check": platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology.resourcePool: Invalid value: "//Resources": resource pool '//Resources' not found 

Expected results:

Validation of topology before attempting to create any resources

As a developer, I would like to remove the random terraform provider because it is essentially unnecessary and would improve our build process.

 

The random Terraform provider is used in Azure & Azure Stack to create a random string. This could easily be done in go code and passed in as a variable. 

Removing an extra provider would decrease our build time and improve our build stability, which is often failing due to timeouts. 

 

The random string is used here in Azure (and similarly in Azure Stack):

https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/data/data/azure/vnet/main.tf#L23-L27

 

One approach would be to generate the string in tfvars and pass it in as a terraform variable.

Description of problem:

openshift-install does not detect releaseImage mismatches between cluster-image-set.yaml and registries.conf

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create ZTP inputs for image generation where registries.conf does not have any source matching the binary releaseimage (the binary image which can be obtained by running "openshift-install version". You can also set this value in ZTP manifest cluster-image-set.yaml 
2.run openshift-install agent create image

Actual results:

Image is generated with no warnings

Expected results:

Image is generated with warning message - "The ImageContentSources configuration in install-config.yaml should have at-least one source field matching the releaseImage value %s", releaseImagePath

 

Additional info:

 

 

Description of problem:

"opm alpha render-veneer semver" raise error when no "Candidate" in config yaml

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

zhaoxia@xzha-mac semver % opm version
Version: version.Version{OpmVersion:"11644a543", GitCommit:"11644a5433442c33698d2eee8d3f865b0d9386c0", BuildDate:"2022-08-29T08:16:54Z", GoOs:"darwin", GoArch:"amd64"}

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. prepare catalog-semver-veneer-wrong.yaml 
zhaoxia@xzha-mac semver % cat catalog-semver-veneer-wrong.yaml 
Schema: olm.semver
GenerateMajorChannels: false
GenerateMinorChannels: true
Stable:
  Bundles:
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v1.0.2
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v2.1.0
Fast:
  Bundles:
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v0.0.1
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v2.0.1
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v2.1.0 

2. run "opm alpha render-veneer semver"
zhaoxia@xzha-mac semver % opm alpha render-veneer semver catalog-semver-veneer-wrong.yaml
2022/08/29 16:48:56 semver "catalog-semver-veneer-wrong.yaml": semver-render: no bundles specified or no bundles could be rendered

3.

Actual results:

error "no bundles specified or no bundles could be rendered" is raised.

Expected results:

no error

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4656. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

`/etc/hostname` may exist, but be empty. `vsphere-hostname` service should check that the file is not empty instead of just that it exists.

OKD's machine-os-content starting from F37 has an empty /etc/hostname file, which breaks joining workers in vsphere IPI

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OKD w/ workers on vsphere
2.
3.

Actual results:


Workers get hostname resolved using NM

Expected results:


Workers get hostname resolved using vmtoolsd

Additional info:


This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13927. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When trying to delete a BMH object, which is unmanaged, the Metal3 cannot delete. The BMH object is unmanaged because it does not provide information about BMC (neither address, nor credentials). 

In this case the Metal 3 tries to delete but fails and never finalizes. The BMH deletion gets stuc.
This is the log from MEtal3

{"level":"info","ts":1676531586.4898946,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"start","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/worker-0.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org"}                                                                                          
{"level":"info","ts":1676531586.4980938,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"start","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-1.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org"}                                                                                          
{"level":"info","ts":1676531586.5050912,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"start","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-2.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org"}                                                                                          
{"level":"info","ts":1676531586.5105371,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"done","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/worker-0.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org","provisioningState":"unmanaged","requeue":true,"after":600}                                
{"level":"info","ts":1676531586.51569,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"start","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-0.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org"}                                                                                            
{"level":"info","ts":1676531586.5191178,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"done","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-1.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org","provisioningState":"unmanaged","requeue":true,"after":600}                                
{"level":"info","ts":1676531586.525755,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"done","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-2.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org","provisioningState":"unmanaged","requeue":true,"after":600}                                 
{"level":"info","ts":1676531586.5356712,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"done","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-0.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org","provisioningState":"unmanaged","requeue":true,"after":600}                                
{"level":"info","ts":1676532186.5117555,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"start","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/worker-0.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org"}                                                                                          
{"level":"info","ts":1676532186.5195107,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"start","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-1.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org"}                                                                                          
{"level":"info","ts":1676532186.526355,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"start","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-2.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org"}                                                                                           
{"level":"info","ts":1676532186.5317476,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"done","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/worker-0.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org","provisioningState":"unmanaged","requeue":true,"after":600}
{"level":"info","ts":1676532186.5361836,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"start","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-0.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org"}                                                                                          
{"level":"info","ts":1676532186.5404322,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"done","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-1.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org","provisioningState":"unmanaged","requeue":true,"after":600}
{"level":"info","ts":1676532186.5482726,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"done","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-2.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org","provisioningState":"unmanaged","requeue":true,"after":600}
{"level":"info","ts":1676532186.555394,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"done","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/master-0.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org","provisioningState":"unmanaged","requeue":true,"after":600}
{"level":"info","ts":1676532532.3448665,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"start","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/worker-1.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org"}                                                                                          
{"level":"info","ts":1676532532.344922,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"hardwareData is ready to be deleted","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/worker-1.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org"}
{"level":"info","ts":1676532532.3656478,"logger":"controllers.BareMetalHost","msg":"Initiating host deletion","baremetalhost":"openshift-machine-api/worker-1.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org","provisioningState":"unmanaged"}
{"level":"error","ts":1676532532.3656952,"msg":"Reconciler error","controller":"baremetalhost","controllerGroup":"metal3.io","controllerKind":"BareMetalHost","bareMetalHost":{"name":"worker-1.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org","namespace":"openshift-machine-api"},
"namespace":"openshift-machine-api","name":"worker-1.el8k-ztp-1.hpecloud.org","reconcileID":"525a5b7d-077d-4d1e-a618-33d6041feb33","error":"action \"unmanaged\" failed: failed to determine current provisioner capacity: failed to parse BMC address informa
tion: missing BMC address","errorVerbose":"missing BMC address\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pkg/hardwareutils/bmc.NewAccessDetails\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pkg/hardwareu
tils/bmc/access.go:145\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pkg/provisioner/ironic.(*ironicProvisioner).bmcAccess\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pkg/provisioner/ironic/ironic.go:112\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pkg/pro
visioner/ironic.(*ironicProvisioner).HasCapacity\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pkg/provisioner/ironic/ironic.go:1922\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).ensureCapacity\n\t/go/src/githu
b.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/host_state_machine.go:83\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).updateHostStateFrom\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/meta
l3.io/host_state_machine.go:106\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).ReconcileState.func1\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/host_state_machine.go:175\ngithub.com/metal
3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).ReconcileState\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/host_state_machine.go:186\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*BareM
etalHostReconciler).Reconcile\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/baremetalhost_controller.go:226\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).Reconcile\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremet
al-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:121\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).reconcileHandler\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/contr
oller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:320\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).processNextWorkItem\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/contro
ller/controller.go:273\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).Start.func2.2\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:234\nruntime.goexit\
n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:1594\nfailed to parse BMC address information\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pkg/provisioner/ironic.(*ironicProvisioner).bmcAccess\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pkg/provisioner/iro
nic/ironic.go:114\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pkg/provisioner/ironic.(*ironicProvisioner).HasCapacity\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/pkg/provisioner/ironic/ironic.go:1922\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controlle
rs/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).ensureCapacity\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/host_state_machine.go:83\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).updateHostStateFrom\n
\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/host_state_machine.go:106\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).ReconcileState.func1\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator
/controllers/metal3.io/host_state_machine.go:175\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).ReconcileState\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/host_state_machine.go:186\ngithu
b.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*BareMetalHostReconciler).Reconcile\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/baremetalhost_controller.go:226\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controll
er.(*Controller).Reconcile\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:121\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).reconcileHandler\n\t/go/sr
c/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:320\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).processNextWorkItem\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-
operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:273\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).Start.func2.2\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-
runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:234\nruntime.goexit\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:1594\nfailed to determine current provisioner capacity\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).ensur
eCapacity\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/host_state_machine.go:85\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).updateHostStateFrom\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal
-operator/controllers/metal3.io/host_state_machine.go:106\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).ReconcileState.func1\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/host_state_machin
e.go:175\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*hostStateMachine).ReconcileState\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/host_state_machine.go:186\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/contr
ollers/metal3%2eio.(*BareMetalHostReconciler).Reconcile\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3.io/baremetalhost_controller.go:226\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).Reconcile\n\t/go/src/gi
thub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:121\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).reconcileHandler\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operato
r/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:320\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).processNextWorkItem\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-r
untime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:273\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).Start.func2.2\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controll
er.go:234\nruntime.goexit\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:1594\naction \"unmanaged\" failed\ngithub.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/controllers/metal3%2eio.(*BareMetalHostReconciler).Reconcile\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operato
r/controllers/metal3.io/baremetalhost_controller.go:230\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).Reconcile\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/contr
oller.go:121\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).reconcileHandler\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:320\nsigs.k8s.io/controller
-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).processNextWorkItem\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:273\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.
(*Controller).Start.func2.2\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:234\nruntime.goexit\n\t/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:1594","stacktrace":"sigs.k8s.io/cont
roller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).processNextWorkItem\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:273\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/contr
oller.(*Controller).Start.func2.2\n\t/go/src/github.com/metal3-io/baremetal-operator/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:234"}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Provide a BMH object with no BMC credentials. The BMH is set unmanaged.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. delete the object
2. gets stuck
3.

Actual results:

get stuck deletiong

Expected results:

Metal3 detects the BMH is unmanaged, and dont try to do deprovisioning.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Customer is not able anymore to provision new baremetal nodes in 4.10.35 using the same rootDeviceHints used in 4.10.10.
Customer uses HP DL360 Gen10, with exteranal SAN storage that is seen by the system as a multipath device. Latest IPA versions are implementing some changes to avoid wiping shared disks and this seems to affect what we should provide as rootDeviceHints.
They used to put /dev/sda as rootDeviceHints, in 4.10.35 it doesn't make the IPA write the image to the disk anymore because it sees the disk as part of a multipath device, we tried using the on top multipath device /dev/dm-0, the system is then able to write the image to the disk but then it gets stuck when it tried to issue a partprobe command, rebooting the systems to boot from the disk does not seem to help complete the provisioning, no workaround so far.

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

by trying to provisioning a baremetal node with a multipath device.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a new BMH using a multipath device as rootDeviceHints
2.
3.

Actual results:

The node does not get provisioned

Expected results:

the node gets provisioned correctly

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3744. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Egress router POD creation on Openshift 4.11 is failing with below error.
~~~
Nov 15 21:51:29 pltocpwn03 hyperkube[3237]: E1115 21:51:29.467436    3237 pod_workers.go:951] "Error syncing pod, skipping" err="failed to \"CreatePodSandbox\" for \"stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy(c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2)\" with CreatePodSandboxError: \"Failed to create sandbox for pod \\\"stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy(c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2)\\\": rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy_c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2_0(72bcf9e52b199061d6e651e84b0892efc142601b2442c2d00b92a1ba23208344): error adding pod stage-wfe-proxy_stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw to CNI network \\\"multus-cni-network\\\": plugin type=\\\"multus\\\" name=\\\"multus-cni-network\\\" failed (add): [stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw/c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2:openshift-sdn]: error adding container to network \\\"openshift-sdn\\\": CNI request failed with status 400: 'could not open netns \\\"/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669\\\": unknown FS magic on \\\"/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669\\\": 1021994\\n'\"" pod="stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw" podUID=c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2
~~~

I have checked SDN POD log from node where egress router POD is failing and I could see below error message.

~~~
2022-11-15T21:51:29.283002590Z W1115 21:51:29.282954  181720 pod.go:296] CNI_ADD stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw failed: could not open netns "/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669": unknown FS magic on "/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669": 1021994
~~~

Crio is logging below event and looking at the log it seems the namespace has been created on node.

~~~
Nov 15 21:51:29 pltocpwn03 crio[3150]: time="2022-11-15 21:51:29.307184956Z" level=info msg="Got pod network &{Name:stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw Namespace:stage-wfe-proxy ID:72bcf9e52b199061d6e651e84b0892efc142601b2442c2d00b92a1ba23208344 UID:c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2 NetNS:/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669 Networks:[] RuntimeConfig:map[multus-cni-network:{IP: MAC: PortMappings:[] Bandwidth:<nil> IpRanges:[]}] Aliases:map[]}"
~~~

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.12

How reproducible:

Not Sure

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Egress router POD is failing to create. Sample application could be created without any issue.

Expected results:

Egress router POD should get created

Additional info:

Egress router POD is created following below document and it does contain pod.network.openshift.io/assign-macvlan: "true" annotation.

https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/networking/openshift_sdn/deploying-egress-router-layer3-redirection.html#nw-egress-router-pod_deploying-egress-router-layer3-redirection

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7102. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/7ec6b948a148171bd336750fed98818890136429/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/plugins/downstream_csv_namespace_labeler_plugin_test.go#L309

has a dependency on creation of a next-version release branch.

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. clone operator-framework/operator-framework-olm
2. make unit/olm
3. deal with a really bumpy first-time kubebuilder/envtest install experience
4. profit

 

 

Actual results:

error

Expected results:

pass

Additional info:

 

 

Description of problem:

Changes were introduced in 4.12 which allowed the designated router (DR) IP to be something other than the .3 address in the per node pod subnet. However, downstream ICNIv1 code was not updated. Therefore the DR may have an IP other than .3, while an ICNIv1 pod has a default route pointing to .3. This results in no egress traffic working from the pod.

 

Example pod in ICNIv1 namespace on 4.12:
[root@pod2 /]# ip route
default via 10.244.0.3 dev eth0
10.96.0.0/16 via 10.244.0.1 dev eth0
10.244.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.244.0.5
10.244.0.0/16 via 10.244.0.1 dev eth0
^route pointing to .3

 

But the real DR IP is claimed as .4:
k8s.ovn.org/hybrid-overlay-distributed-router-gateway-ip: 10.244.0.4
.4 set in ARP flows:
cookie=0x0, duration=25.803s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=100,arp,in_port=ext,arp_tpa=10.244.0.4,arp_op=1 actions=move:NXM_OF_ETH_SRC[]>NXM_OF_ETH_DST[],mod_dl_src:0a:58:0a:f4:00:03,load:0x2>NXM_OF_ARP_OP[],move:NXM_NX_ARP_SHA[]>NXM_NX_ARP_THA[],move:NXM_OF_ARP_SPA[]>NXM_OF_ARP_TPA[],load:0xa580af40003->NXM_NX_ARP_SHA[],load:0xaf40004->NXM_OF_ARP_SPA[],IN_PORT,resubmit(,1)

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12450. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

opm serve fails with message:

Error: compute digest: compute hash: write tar: stat .: os: DirFS with empty root

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

(The easiest reproducer involves serving an empty catalog)

1. mkdir /tmp/catalog

2. using Dockerfile /tmp/catalog.Dockerfile based on 4.12 docs (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.12/html-single/operators/index#olm-creating-fb-catalog-image_olm-managing-custom-catalogs
# The base image is expected to contain
# /bin/opm (with a serve subcommand) and /bin/grpc_health_probe
FROM registry.redhat.io/openshift4/ose-operator-registry:v4.12

# Configure the entrypoint and command
ENTRYPOINT ["/bin/opm"]
CMD ["serve", "/configs"]

# Copy declarative config root into image at /configs
ADD catalog /configs

# Set DC-specific label for the location of the DC root directory
# in the image
LABEL operators.operatorframework.io.index.configs.v1=/configs

3. build the image `cd /tmp/ && docker build -f catalog.Dockerfile .`

4. execute an instance of the container in docker/podman `docker run --name cat-run [image-file]`

5. error

Using a dockerfile generated from opm (`opm generate dockerfile [dir]`) works, but includes precache and cachedir options to opm.

 

Actual results:

Error: compute digest: compute hash: write tar: stat .: os: DirFS with empty root

Expected results:

opm generates cache in default /tmp/cache location and serves without error

Additional info:

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2841. The following is the description of the original issue:

Currently the agent installer supports only x86_64 arch. The image creation command must fail if some other arch is configured different from x86_64

We want to have an allowed list of architectures.

allowed = ['x86_64', 'amd64']

Description of problem:

The error message of "opm alpha render-veneer semver" is not correct, "semver &{%!q(*os.file=&{{{0 0 0} 3 {0} 0 1 true true true}" is meaningless, should not be printed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

zhaoxia@xzha-mac operator-framework-olm % opm version
Version: version.Version{OpmVersion:"2149aebcc", GitCommit:"2149aebcc71367e6fba8f5416374917dae1e6a1c", BuildDate:"2022-09-08T04:31:47Z", GoOs:"darwin", GoArch:"amd64"}

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create file
zhaoxia@xzha-mac OCP-53915 % cat catalog-semver-veneer-1.yaml
Schema: olm.semver
Candidate:
  Bundles:
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v0.0.1
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v1.0.1
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v1.0.1-alpha
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v1.0.1-beta
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v1.0.1-alpha20220829
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v1.0.1-alpha20220830
Stable:
  Bundles:
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v1.0.1-beta
Fast:
  Bundles:
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v0.0.1
  - Image: quay.io/olmqe/nginxolm-operator-bundle:v1.0.1-beta

2. run "opm alpha render-veneer semver" 
zhaoxia@xzha-mac operator-framework-olm % opm alpha render-veneer semver catalog-semver-veneer-1.yaml
2022/09/08 12:35:05 semver &{%!q(*os.file=&{{{0 0 0} 3 {0} <nil> 0 1 true true true} catalog-semver-veneer-1.yaml <nil> false false false})}: semver-render: unable to post-process bundle info: encountered bundle versions which differ only by build metadata, which cannot be ordered: [bundle version "1.0.1-alpha" cannot be compared to "1.0.1-alpha", bundle version "1.0.1-alpha+20220829" cannot be compared to "1.0.1-alpha"] 

3.

Actual results:

"semver &{%!q(*os.file=&{{{0 0 0} 3 {0} 0 1 true true true}" is meaningless, should not be printed.

Expected results:

no error message "semver &{%!q(*os.file=&{{{0 0 0} 3 {0} 0 1 true true true}"

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5018. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When upgrading from 4.11 to 4.12 an IPI AWS cluster which included Machineset and BYOH Windows nodes, the upgrade hanged while trying to upgrade the machine-api component:

$ oc get clusterversion                                                                              
NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS                                      
version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        True          117m    Working towards 4.12.0-rc.5: 214 of 827 done (25% complete), waiting on machine-api

$ oc get co                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE                                                                                                                                   
authentication                             4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h47m   
baremetal                                  4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m   
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      5h3m    
cloud-credential                           4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h4m                                                                                                                                              
cluster-autoscaler                         4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m   
config-operator                            4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      5h1m    
console                                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h43m   
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h      
dns                                        4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m   
etcd                                       4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      4h58m         
image-registry                             4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h54m         
ingress                                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h55m   
insights                                   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h53m         
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      4h50m         
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      4h57m                                                                                                                                             
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-rc.5                          True        False         False      4h57m                                                                                                                                             kube-storage-version-migrator              4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h                                                                                                                                                machine-api                                4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        True          False      4h56m   Progressing towards operator: 4.12.0-rc.5                                                                                                 
machine-approver                           4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h                                                                                                                                                machine-config                             4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m                                                                                                                                             marketplace                                4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m   
monitoring                                 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h53m                                                                                                                                             
network                                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h3m          
node-tuning                                4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h59m                                                                                                                                             
openshift-apiserver                        4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h53m         
openshift-controller-manager               4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h56m                                                                                                                                             
openshift-samples                          4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h55m                                                                                                                                             
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h                                                                                                                                                
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h                                                                                                                                                
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      4h55m                                                                                                                                             
service-ca                                 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h                                                                                                                                                
storage                                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        False         False      5h      

When digging a little deeper into the exact component hanging, we observed that it was the machine-api-termination-handler that was running in the Machine Windows workers, the one that was in ImagePullBackOff state:

$ oc get pods -n openshift-machine-api                                                                                                                                                                                                   
NAME                                           READY   STATUS             RESTARTS   AGE                                                                                                                                                                               
cluster-autoscaler-operator-6ff66b6655-kpgp9   2/2     Running            0          5h5m                                                                                                                                                                              
cluster-baremetal-operator-6dbcd6f76b-d9dwd    2/2     Running            0          5h5m                                          
machine-api-controllers-cdb8d979b-79xlh        7/7     Running            0          94m                                                                                                                                                                               
machine-api-operator-86bf4f6d79-g2vwm          2/2     Running            0          97m                                           
machine-api-termination-handler-fcfq2          0/1     ImagePullBackOff   0          94m                                                                                                                                                                               
machine-api-termination-handler-gj4pf          1/1     Running            0          4h57m                                                                                                                                                                             
machine-api-termination-handler-krwdg          0/1     ImagePullBackOff   0          94m                                                                                                                                                                               
machine-api-termination-handler-l95x2          1/1     Running            0          4h54m                                                                                                                                                                             
machine-api-termination-handler-p6sw6          1/1     Running            0          4h57m   

$ oc describe pods machine-api-termination-handler-fcfq2 -n openshift-machine-api                                                                                                                                                        
Name:                 machine-api-termination-handler-fcfq2
Namespace:            openshift-machine-api
Priority:             2000001000
Priority Class Name:  system-node-critical
.....................................................................
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age                    From               Message
  ----     ------                  ----                   ----               -------
  Normal   Scheduled               94m                    default-scheduler  Successfully assigned openshift-machine-api/machine-api-termination-handler-fcfq2 to ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  94m                    kubelet            Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to setup network for sandbox "7b80f84cc547310f5370a7dde7c651ca661dd40ebd0730296329d1cbe8981b37": plugin type="win-ov
erlay" name="OVNKubernetesHybridOverlayNetwork" failed (add): error while adding HostComputeEndpoint: failed to create the new HostComputeEndpoint: hcnCreateEndpoint failed in Win32: The object already exists. (0x1392) {"Success":false,"Error":"The object already
 exists. ","ErrorCode":2147947410}
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  94m                    kubelet            Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to setup network for sandbox "6b3e020a419dde8359a31b56129c65821011e232467d712f9f5081f32fe380c9": plugin type="win-ov
erlay" name="OVNKubernetesHybridOverlayNetwork" failed (add): error while adding HostComputeEndpoint: failed to create the new HostComputeEndpoint: hcnCreateEndpoint failed in Win32: The object already exists. (0x1392) {"Success":false,"Error":"The object already
 exists. ","ErrorCode":2147947410}
  Normal   Pulling                 93m (x4 over 94m)      kubelet            Pulling image "quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:9aa96cb22047b62f785b87bf81ec1762703c1489079dd33008085b5585adc258"
  Warning  Failed                  93m (x4 over 94m)      kubelet            Error: ErrImagePull
  Normal   BackOff                 4m39s (x393 over 94m)  kubelet            Back-off pulling image "quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:9aa96cb22047b62f785b87bf81ec1762703c1489079dd33008085b5585adc258"


$ oc get pods -n openshift-machine-api -o wide
NAME                                           READY   STATUS             RESTARTS   AGE     IP             NODE                                         NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
cluster-autoscaler-operator-6ff66b6655-kpgp9   2/2     Running            0          5h8m    10.130.0.10    ip-10-0-180-35.us-east-2.compute.internal    <none>           <none>
cluster-baremetal-operator-6dbcd6f76b-d9dwd    2/2     Running            0          5h8m    10.130.0.8     ip-10-0-180-35.us-east-2.compute.internal    <none>           <none>
machine-api-controllers-cdb8d979b-79xlh        7/7     Running            0          97m     10.128.0.144   ip-10-0-138-246.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
machine-api-operator-86bf4f6d79-g2vwm          2/2     Running            0          100m    10.128.0.143   ip-10-0-138-246.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
machine-api-termination-handler-fcfq2          0/1     ImagePullBackOff   0          97m     10.129.0.7     ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
machine-api-termination-handler-gj4pf          1/1     Running            0          5h      10.0.223.37    ip-10-0-223-37.us-east-2.compute.internal    <none>           <none>
machine-api-termination-handler-krwdg          0/1     ImagePullBackOff   0          97m     10.128.0.4     ip-10-0-143-111.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
machine-api-termination-handler-l95x2          1/1     Running            0          4h57m   10.0.172.211   ip-10-0-172-211.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
machine-api-termination-handler-p6sw6          1/1     Running            0          5h      10.0.146.227   ip-10-0-146-227.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>
[jfrancoa@localhost byoh-auto]$ oc get nodes -o wide | grep ip-10-0-143-111.us-east-2.compute.internal
ip-10-0-143-111.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker   4h24m   v1.24.0-2566+5157800f2a3bc3   10.0.143.111   <none>        Windows Server 2019 Datacenter                                  10.0.17763.3770                containerd://1.18
[jfrancoa@localhost byoh-auto]$ oc get nodes -o wide | grep ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal
ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker   4h18m   v1.24.0-2566+5157800f2a3bc3   10.0.145.114   <none>        Windows Server 2019 Datacenter                                  10.0.17763.3770                containerd://1.18
[jfrancoa@localhost byoh-auto]$ oc get machine.machine.openshift.io -n openshift-machine-api -o wide | grep ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal
jfrancoa-1912-aws-rvkrp-windows-worker-us-east-2a-v57sh   Running   m5a.large    us-east-2   us-east-2a   4h37m   ip-10-0-145-114.us-east-2.compute.internal   aws:///us-east-2a/i-0b69d52c625c46a6a   running
[jfrancoa@localhost byoh-auto]$ oc get machine.machine.openshift.io -n openshift-machine-api -o wide | grep ip-10-0-143-111.us-east-2.compute.internal
jfrancoa-1912-aws-rvkrp-windows-worker-us-east-2a-j6gkc   Running   m5a.large    us-east-2   us-east-2a   4h37m   ip-10-0-143-111.us-east-2.compute.internal   aws:///us-east-2a/i-05e422c0051707d16   running

This is blocking the whole upgrade process, as the upgrade is not able to move further from this component.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443   True        True          141m    Working towards 4.12.0-rc.5: 214 of 827 done (25% complete), waiting on machine-api
$ oc version
Client Version: 4.11.0-0.ci-2022-06-09-065118
Kustomize Version: v4.5.4
Server Version: 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-12-16-190443
Kubernetes Version: v1.25.4+77bec7a

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy a 4.11 IPI AWS cluster with Windows workers using a MachineSet
2. Perform the upgrade to 4.12
3. Wait for the upgrade to hang on the machine-api component

Actual results:

The upgrade hangs when upgrading the machine-api component.

Expected results:

The upgrade suceeds

Additional info:


Description of problem:

As a downstream consumer of the installer (as a library), I want to be able to choose whether or not the image gallery is used when creating machinesets on Azure so that I can achieve backwards compatibility with pre-4.12

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12+

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Try to generate machinesets in pre-4.12 environment
2. Lament as the installer automatically uses image gallery regardless

Actual results:

Installer attempts to guess whether to use image gallery

Expected results:

I should be able to choose myself

Additional info:

 

Sprig is a dependency of cno which is in turn a dependency of multiple projects while the old sprig has a vulnerability.

Description of problem:

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

OLM has a dependency on openshift/cluster-policy-controller. This project had dependencies with v0.0.0 versions, which due to a bug in ART was causing issues building the olm image. To fix this, we have to update the dependencies in the cluster-policy-controller project to point to actual versions.

This was already done:
 * https://github.com/openshift/cluster-policy-controller/pull/103
 * https://github.com/openshift/cluster-policy-controller/pull/101

And these changes already made it to 4.14 and 4.13 branches of the cluster-policy-controller.

The backport to 4.12 is: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-policy-controller/pull/102

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

When the Insights operator is marked as disabled then the "Available" operator condition is updated every 2 mins. This is not desired and gives an impression that the operator is restarted every 2 mins 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

No extra steps needed, just watch "oc get co insights --watch"

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

available condition transition time updated every 2 min

Expected results:

available condition is updated only when its status changed

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

On storageclass creation page, the dropdown items for "Reclaim policy" and "Volume binding tyep" are not marked for i18n.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-22-143022

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Go to storageclass creation page, check if dropdown items for "Reclaim policy" and "Volume binding type" support i18n.
2.
3.

Actual results:

1. They are not marked for i18n.

Expected results:

1. Should support i18n.

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10558. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When running a cluster on application credentials, this event appears repeatedly:

ns/openshift-machine-api machineset/nhydri0d-f8dcc-kzcwf-worker-0 hmsg/173228e527 - pathological/true reason/ReconcileError could not find information for "ci.m1.xlarge"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Happens in the CI (https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_release/33330/rehearse-33330-periodic-ci-shiftstack-shiftstack-ci-main-periodic-4.13-e2e-openstack-ovn-serial/1633149670878351360).

Steps to Reproduce:

1. On a living cluster, rotate the OpenStack cloud credentials
2. Invalidate the previous credentials
3. Watch the machine-api events (`oc -n openshift-machine-api get event`). A `Warning` type of issue could not find information for "name-of-the-flavour" will appear.

If the cluster was installed using a password that you can't invalidate:
1. Rotate the cloud credentials to application credentials
2. Restart MAPO (`oc -n openshift-machine-api get pods -o NAME | xargs -r oc -n openshift-machine-api delete`)
3. Rotate cloud credentials again
4. Revoke the first application credentials you set
5. Finally watch the events (`oc -n openshift-machine-api get event`)

The event signals that MAPO wasn't able to update flavour information on the MachineSet status.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

No issue detecting the flavour details

Additional info:

Offending code likely around this line: https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-provider-openstack/blob/bcb08a7835c08d20606d75757228fd03fbb20dab/pkg/machineset/controller.go#L116

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10864. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

APIServer service not selected correctly for PublicAndPrivate when external-dns isn't configured. 
Image: 4.14 Hypershift operator + OCP 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-23-050449

jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$ oc get hostedcluster/jz-test -n clusters -ojsonpath='{.spec.platform.aws.endpointAccess}{"\n"}'
PublicAndPrivate

    - lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-24T15:13:15Z"
      message: Cluster operators console, dns, image-registry, ingress, insights,
        kube-storage-version-migrator, monitoring, openshift-samples, service-ca are
        not available
      observedGeneration: 3
      reason: ClusterOperatorsNotAvailable
      status: "False"
      type: ClusterVersionSucceeding

services:
  - service: APIServer
   servicePublishingStrategy:
    type: LoadBalancer
  - service: OAuthServer
   servicePublishingStrategy:
    type: Route
  - service: Konnectivity
   servicePublishingStrategy:
    type: Route
  - service: Ignition
   servicePublishingStrategy:
    type: Route
  - service: OVNSbDb
   servicePublishingStrategy:
    type: Route

jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$ oc get service -n clusters-jz-test | grep kube-apiserver
kube-apiserver            LoadBalancer  172.30.211.131  aa029c422933444139fb738257aedb86-9e9709e3fa1b594e.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com  6443:32562/TCP         34m
kube-apiserver-private        LoadBalancer  172.30.161.79  ab8434aa316e845c59690ca0035332f0-d818b9434f506178.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com  6443:32100/TCP         34m
jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$

jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$ cat hostedcluster.kubeconfig | grep server
  server: https://ab8434aa316e845c59690ca0035332f0-d818b9434f506178.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com:6443
jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$

jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$ oc get node --kubeconfig=hostedcluster.kubeconfig 
E0324 11:17:44.003589   95300 memcache.go:238] couldn't get current server API group list: Get "https://ab8434aa316e845c59690ca0035332f0-d818b9434f506178.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com:6443/api?timeout=32s": dial tcp 10.0.129.24:6443: i/o timeout

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create a PublicAndPrivate cluster without external-dns
2.access the guest cluster (it should fail)
3.

Actual results:

unable to access the guest cluster via 'oc get node --kubeconfig=<guest cluster kubeconfig>', some guest cluster co are not available

Expected results:

The cluster is up and running, the guest cluster can be accessed via 'oc get node --kubeconfig=<guest cluster kubeconfig>'

Additional info:

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13168. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

oc login --token=$token
--server=https://api.dalh-dev-hs-2.05zb.p3.openshiftapps.com:443 --certificate-authority=ca.crt
The server uses a certificate signed by an unknown authority.
You can bypass the certificate check, but any data you send to the server could be intercepted by others.

The referenced "ca.crt" comes from the Secret created when a Service Account is created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.12.12

How reproducible: Always

Description of problem:

In a 4.11 cluster with only openshift-samples enabled, the 4.12 introduced optional COs console and insights are installed. While upgrading to 4.12, CVO considers them to be disabled explicitly and skips reconciling them. So these COs are not upgraded to 4.12.

Installed COs cannot be disabled, so CVO is supposed to implicitly enable them.


$ oc get clusterversion -oyaml
{
  "apiVersion": "config.openshift.io/v1",
     "kind": "ClusterVersion",
     "metadata": {
         "creationTimestamp": "2022-09-30T05:02:31Z",
         "generation": 3,
         "name": "version",
         "resourceVersion": "134808",
         "uid": "bd95473f-ffda-402d-8fe3-74f852a9d6eb"
     },
     "spec": {
         "capabilities": {
             "additionalEnabledCapabilities": [
                 "openshift-samples"
             ],
             "baselineCapabilitySet": "None"
         },
         "channel": "stable-4.11",
         "clusterID": "8eda5167-a730-4b39-be1d-214a80506d34",
         "desiredUpdate": {
             "force": true,
             "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc",
             "version": ""
         }
     },
     "status": {
         "availableUpdates": null,
         "capabilities": {
             "enabledCapabilities": [
                 "openshift-samples"
             ],
             "knownCapabilities": [
                 "Console",
                 "Insights",
                 "Storage",
                 "baremetal",
                 "marketplace",
                 "openshift-samples"
             ]
         },
         "conditions": [
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "message": "Unable to retrieve available updates: currently reconciling cluster version 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 not found in the \"stable-4.11\" channel",
                 "reason": "VersionNotFound",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "RetrievedUpdates"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "message": "Capabilities match configured spec",
                 "reason": "AsExpected",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "ImplicitlyEnabledCapabilities"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "message": "Payload loaded version=\"4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419\" image=\"registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc\" architecture=\"amd64\"",
                 "reason": "PayloadLoaded",
                 "status": "True",
                 "type": "ReleaseAccepted"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:23:18Z",
                 "message": "Done applying 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419",
                 "status": "True",
                 "type": "Available"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T07:05:42Z",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "Failing"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T07:41:53Z",
                 "message": "Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "Progressing"
             }
         ],
         "desired": {
             "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc",
             "version": "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419"
         },
         "history": [
             {
                 "completionTime": "2022-09-30T07:41:53Z",
                 "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc",
                 "startedTime": "2022-09-30T06:42:01Z",
                 "state": "Completed",
                 "verified": false,
                 "version": "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419"
             },
             {
                 "completionTime": "2022-09-30T05:23:18Z",
                 "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:5a6f6d1bf5c752c75d7554aa927c06b5ea0880b51909e83387ee4d3bca424631",
                 "startedTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "state": "Completed",
                 "verified": false,
                 "version": "4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451"
             }
         ],
         "observedGeneration": 3,
         "versionHash": "CSCJ2fxM_2o="
     }
 }

$ oc get co
 NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      93m     
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h56m   
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h59m   
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h53m   
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
console                                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451   True        False         False      3h45m   
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      117m    
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h53m   
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h52m   
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h46m   
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      151m    
insights                                   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451   True        False         False      3h48m   
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h50m   
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h51m   
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h51m   
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      91m     
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h50m   
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
machine-config                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h52m   
monitoring                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h44m   
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h55m   
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      113m    
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h48m   
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      113m    
openshift-samples                          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      116m    
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h48m   
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a 4.11 cluster with only openshift-samples enabled
2. Upgrade to 4.12
3.

Actual results:

The 4.12 introduced optional CO console and insights are not upgraded to 4.12

Expected results:

All the installed COs get upgraded

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

The IBM VPC block CSI driver was rebased to v5.0.0 in this PR:
https://github.com/openshift/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/pull/26

However, we're missing the manifest changes from this PR in 4.12 (delayed by CI issues):
https://github.com/openshift/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator/pull/45

That includes some important changes:
- add csi-snapshotter sidecar and snapshotter manifests
- only deploy volumesnapshotclass if CRD exists
- set consistent imagePullPolicy in deployment manifests
- enable topology tests

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info: