Back to index

4.12.25

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.59

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The End of General support for vSphere 6.7 will be on October 15, 2022. So, vSphere 6.7 will be deprecated for 4.11.

We want to encourage vSphere customers to upgrade to vSphere 7 in OCP 4.11 since VMware is EOLing (general support) for vSphere 6.7 in Oct 2022.

We want the cluster Upgradeable=false + have a strong alert pointing to our docs / requirements.

related slack: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CH06KMDRV/p1647541493096729

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

There is a new driver release 5.0.0 since the last rebase that includes snapshot support:

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/releases/tag/v5.0.0

Rebase the driver on v5.0.0 and update the deployments in ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator.
There are no corresponding changes in ibm-vpc-node-label-updater since the last rebase.

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

This includes ibm-vpc-node-label-updater!

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Epic Goal

  • Enable the migration from a storage intree driver to a CSI based driver with minimal impact to the end user, applications and cluster
  • These migrations would include, but are not limited to:
    • CSI driver for AWS EBS
    • CSI driver for GCP
    • CSI driver for Azure (file and disk)
    • CSI driver for VMware vSphere

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

This Epic tracks the GA of this feature

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview  

Much like core OpenShift operators, a standardized flow exists for OLM-managed operators to interact with the cluster in a specific way to leverage AWS STS authorization when using AWS APIs as opposed to insecure static, long-lived credentials. OLM-managed operators can implement integration with the CloudCredentialOperator in well-defined way to support this flow.

Goals:

Enable customers to easily leverage OpenShift's capabilities around AWS STS with layered products, for increased security posture. Enable OLM-managed operators to implement support for this in well-defined pattern.

Requirements:

  • CCO gets a new mode in which it can reconcile STS credential request for OLM-managed operators
  • A standardized flow is leveraged to guide users in discovering and preparing their AWS IAM policies and roles with permissions that are required for OLM-managed operators 
  • A standardized flow is defined in which users can configure OLM-managed operators to leverage AWS STS
  • An example operator is used to demonstrate the end2end functionality
  • Clear instructions and documentation for operator development teams to implement the required interaction with the CloudCredentialOperator to support this flow

Use Cases:

See Operators & STS slide deck.

 

Out of Scope:

  • handling OLM-managed operator updates in which AWS IAM permission requirements might change from one version to another (which requires user awareness and intervention)

 

Background:

The CloudCredentialsOperator already provides a powerful API for OpenShift's cluster core operator to request credentials and acquire them via short-lived tokens. This capability should be expanded to OLM-managed operators, specifically to Red Hat layered products that interact with AWS APIs. The process today is cumbersome to none-existent based on the operator in question and seen as an adoption blocker of OpenShift on AWS.

 

Customer Considerations

This is particularly important for ROSA customers. Customers are expected to be asked to pre-create the required IAM roles outside of OpenShift, which is deemed acceptable.

Documentation Considerations

  • Internal documentation needs to exists to guide Red Hat operator developer teams on the requirements and proposed implementation of integration with CCO and the proposed flow
  • External documentation needs to exist to guide users on:
    • how to become aware that the cluster is in STS mode
    • how to become aware of operators that support STS and the proposed CCO flow
    • how to become aware of the IAM permissions requirements of these operators
    • how to configure an operator in the proposed flow to interact with CCO

Interoperability Considerations

  • this needs to work with ROSA
  • this needs to work with self-managed OCP on AWS

Market Problem

This Section: High-Level description of the Market Problem ie: Executive Summary

  • As a customer of OpenShift layered products, I need to be able to fluidly, reliably and consistently install and use OpenShift layered product Kubernetes Operators into my ROSA STS clusters, while keeping a STS workflow throughout.
  •  
  • As a customer of OpenShift on the big cloud providers, overall I expect OpenShift as a platform to function equally well with tokenized cloud auth as it does with "mint-mode" IAM credentials. I expect the same from the Kubernetes Operators under the Red Hat brand (that need to reach cloud APIs) in that tokenized workflows are equally integrated and workable as with "mint-mode" IAM credentials.
  •  
  • As the managed services, including Hypershift teams, offering a downstream opinionated, supported and managed lifecycle of OpenShift (in the forms of ROSA, ARO, OSD on GCP, Hypershift, etc), the OpenShift platform should have as close as possible, native integration with core platform operators when clusters use tokenized cloud auth, driving the use of layered products.
  • .
  • As the Hypershift team, where the only credential mode for clusters/customers is STS (on AWS) , the Red Hat branded Operators that must reach the AWS API, should be enabled to work with STS credentials in a consistent, and automated fashion that allows customer to use those operators as easily as possible, driving the use of layered products.

Why it Matters

  • Adding consistent, automated layered product integrations to OpenShift would provide great added value to OpenShift as a platform, and its downstream offerings in Managed Cloud Services and related offerings.
  • Enabling Kuberenetes Operators (at first, Red Hat ones) on OpenShift for the "big3" cloud providers is a key differentiation and security requirement that our customers have been and continue to demand.
  • HyperShift is an STS-only architecture, which means that if our layered offerings via Operators cannot easily work with STS, then it would be blocking us from our broad product adoption goals.

Illustrative User Stories or Scenarios

  1. Main success scenario - high-level user story
    1. customer creates a ROSA STS or Hypershift cluster (AWS)
    2. customer wants basic (table-stakes) features such as AWS EFS or RHODS or Logging
    3. customer sees necessary tasks for preparing for the operator in OperatorHub from their cluster
    4. customer prepares AWS IAM/STS roles/policies in anticipation of the Operator they want, using what they get from OperatorHub
    5. customer's provides a very minimal set of parameters (AWS ARN of role(s) with policy) to the Operator's OperatorHub page
    6. The cluster can automatically setup the Operator, using the provided tokenized credentials and the Operator functions as expected
    7. Cluster and Operator upgrades are taken into account and automated
    8. The above steps 1-7 should apply similarly for Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure Cloud, with their respective token-based workload identity systems.
  2. Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
    1. The same as above, but the ROSA CLI would assist with AWS role/policy management
    2. The same as above, but the oc CLI would assist with cloud role/policy management (per respective cloud provider for the cluster)
  3. ...

Expected Outcomes

This Section: Articulates and defines the value proposition from a users point of view

  • See SDE-1868 as an example of what is needed, including design proposed, for current-day ROSA STS and by extension Hypershift.
  • Further research is required to accomodate the AWS STS equivalent systems of GCP and Azure
  • Order of priority at this time is
    • 1. AWS STS for ROSA and ROSA via HyperShift
    • 2. Microsoft Azure for ARO
    • 3. Google Cloud for OpenShift Dedicated on GCP

Effect

This Section: Effect is the expected outcome within the market. There are two dimensions of outcomes; growth or retention. This represents part of the “why” statement for a feature.

  • Growth is the acquisition of net new usage of the platform. This can be new workloads not previously able to be supported, new markets not previously considered, or new end users not previously served.
  • Retention is maintaining and expanding existing use of the platform. This can be more effective use of tools, competitive pressures, and ease of use improvements.
  • Both of growth and retention are the effect of this effort.
    • Customers have strict requirements around using only token-based cloud credential systems for workloads in their cloud accounts, which include OpenShift clusters in all forms.
      • We gain new customers from both those that have waited for token-based auth/auth from OpenShift and from those that are new to OpenShift, with strict requirements around cloud account access
      • We retain customers that are going thru both cloud-native and hybrid-cloud journeys that all inevitably see security requirements driving them towards token-based auth/auth.
      •  

References

As an engineer I want the capability to implement CI test cases that run at different intervals, be it daily, weekly so as to ensure downstream operators that are dependent on certain capabilities are not negatively impacted if changes in systems CCO interacts with change behavior.

Acceptance Criteria:

Create a stubbed out e2e test path in CCO and matching e2e calling code in release such that there exists a path to tests that verify working in an AWS STS workflow.

OC mirror is GA product as of Openshift 4.11 .

The goal of this feature is to solve any future customer request for new features or capabilities in OC mirror 

Epic Goal

  • Mirror to mirror operations and custom mirroring flows required by IBM CloudPak catalog management

Why is this important?

  • IBM needs additional customization around the actual mirroring of images to enable CloudPaks to fully adopt OLM-style operator packaging and catalog management
  • IBM CloudPaks introduce additional compute architectures, increasing the download volume by 2/3rds to day, we need the ability to effectively filter non-required image versions of OLM operator catalogs during filtering for other customers that only require a single or a subset of the available image architectures
  • IBM CloudPaks regularly run on older OCP versions like 4.8 which require additional work to be able to read the mirrored catalog produced by oc mirror

Scenarios

  1. Customers can use the oc utility and delegate the actual image mirror step to another tool
  2. Customers can mirror between disconnected registries using the oc utility
  3. The oc utility supports filtering manifest lists in the context of multi-arch images according to the sparse manifest list proposal in the distribution spec

Acceptance Criteria

  • Customers can use the oc utility to mirror between two different air-gapped environments
  • Customers can specify the desired computer architectures and oc mirror will create sparse manifest lists in the target registry as a result

Dependencies (internal and external)

Previous Work:

  1. WRKLDS-369
  2. Disconnected Mirroring Improvement Proposal

Related Work:

  1. https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/pull/310
  2. https://github.com/distribution/distribution/pull/3536
  3. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10ozLoV7sVPLB8msLx4LYamooQDSW-CAnLiNiJ9SER2k/edit?usp=sharing

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

Overview 

HyperShift came to life to serve multiple goals, some are main near-term, some are secondary that serve well long-term. 

Main Goals for hosted control planes (HyperShift)

  • Optimize OpenShift for Cost/footprint/ which improves our competitive stance against the *KSes
  • Establish separation of concerns which makes it more resilient for SRE to manage their workload clusters (be it security, configuration management, etc).
  • Simplify and enhance multi-cluster management experience especially since multi-cluster is becoming an industry need nowadays. 

Secondary Goals

HyperShift opens up doors to penetrate the market. HyperShift enables true hybrid (CP and Workers decoupled, mixed IaaS, mixed Arch,...). An architecture that opens up more options to target new opportunities in the cloud space. For more details on this one check: Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

 

Hosted Control Planes (HyperShift) Map 

To bring hosted control planes to our customers, we need the means to ship it. Today MCE is how HyperShift shipped, and installed so that customers can use it. There are two main customers for hosted-control-planes: 

 

  • Self-managed: In that case, Red Hat would provide hosted control planes as a service that is managed and SREed by the customer for their tenants (hence “self”-managed). In this management model, our external customers are the direct consumers of the multi-cluster control plane as a servie. Once MCE is installed, they can start to self-service dedicated control planes. 

 

  • Managed: This is OpenShift as a managed service, today we only “manage” the CP, and share the responsibility for other system components, more info here. To reduce management costs incurred by service delivery organizations which translates to operating profit (by reducing variable costs per control-plane), as well as to improve user experience, lower platform overhead (allow customers to focus mostly on writing applications and not concern themselves with infrastructure artifacts), and improve the cluster provisioning experience. HyperShift is shipped via MCE, and delivered to Red Hat managed SREs (same consumption route). However, for managed services, additional tooling needs to be refactored to support the new provisioning path. Furthermore, unlike self-managed where customers are free to bring their own observability stack, Red Hat managed SREs need to observe the managed fleet to ensure compliance with SLOs/SLIs/…

 

If you have noticed, MCE is the delivery mechanism for both management models. The difference between managed and self-managed is the consumer persona. For self-managed, it's the customer SRE for managed its the RH SRE

High-level Requirements

For us to ship HyperShift in the product (as hosted control planes) in either management model, there is a necessary readiness checklist that we need to satisfy. Below are the high-level requirements needed before GA: 

 

  • Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story (with MCE)
  • Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption  
  • Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components.  
  • Hosted control planes has an HA and a DR story
  • Hosted control planes is in parity with top-level add-on operators 
  • Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption
  • Hosted control planes is observable  
  • HyperShift as a backend to managed services is fully unblocked.

 

Please also have a look at our What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness? doc. 

Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story

Multi-cluster is becoming an industry need today not because this is where trend is going but because it’s the only viable path today to solve for many of our customer’s use-cases. Below is some reasoning why multi-cluster is a NEED:

 

 

As a result, multi-cluster management is a defining category in the market where Red Hat plays a key role. Today Red Hat solves for multi-cluster via RHACM and MCE. The goal is to simplify fleet management complexity by providing a single pane of glass to observe, secure, police, govern, configure a fleet. I.e., the operand is no longer one cluster but a set, a fleet of clusters. 

HyperShift logically centralized architecture, as well as native separation of concerns and superior cluster lifecyle management experience, makes it a great fit as the foundation of our multi-cluster management story. 

Thus the following stories are important for HyperShift: 

  • When lifecycling OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported providers from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to use a consistent UI so I can manage and operate (observe, govern,...) a fleet of clusters.
  • I want to specify HA constraints (e.g., deploy my clusters in different regions) while ensuring acceptable QoS (e.g., latency boundaries) to ensure/reduce any potential downtime for my workloads. 
  • When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported provider from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to backup any critical data so I am able to restore them in case of hosting service cluster (management cluster) failure. 

Refs:

Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption.

 

HyperShift is the core engine that will be used to provide hosted control-planes for consumption in managed and self-managed. 

 

Main user story:  When life cycling clusters as a cluster service consumer via HyperShift core APIs, I want to use a stable/backward compatible API that is less susceptible to future changes so I can provide availability guarantees. 

 

Ref: What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness?

Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components. 

 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumptions

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

HyperShift - proposed cuts from data plane

HyperShift has an HA and a DR story

When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin) I want to be able to migrate CPs from one hosting service cluster to another:

  • as means for disaster recovery in the case of total failure
  • so that scaling pressures on a management cluster can be mitigated or a management cluster can be decommissioned.

More information: 

 

Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption

To understand usage patterns and inform our decision making for the product. We need to be able to measure adoption and assess usage.

See Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

Hosted control plane is observable  

Whether it's managed or self-managed, it’s pertinent to report health metrics to be able to create meaningful Service Level Objectives (SLOs), alert of failure to meet our availability guarantees. This is especially important for our managed services path. 

HyperShift is in parity with top-level add-on operators

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-8901 

Unblock HyperShift as a backend to managed services

HyperShift for managed services is a strategic company goal as it improves usability, feature, and cost competitiveness against other managed solutions, and because managed services/consumption-based cloud services is where we see the market growing (customers are looking to delegate platform overhead). 

 

We should make sure our SD milestones are unblocked by the core team. 

 

Note 

This feature reflects HyperShift core readiness to be consumed. When all related EPICs and stories in this EPIC are complete HyperShift can be considered ready to be consumed in GA form. This does not describe a date but rather the readiness of core HyperShift to be consumed in GA form NOT the GA itself.

- GA date for self-managed will be factoring in other inputs such as adoption, customer interest/commitment, and other factors. 
- GA dates for ROSA-HyperShift are on track, tracked in milestones M1-7 (have a look at https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-5771

Epic Goal*

The goal is to split client certificate trust chains from the global Hypershift root CA.

 
Why is this important? (mandatory)

This is important to:

  • assure a workload can be run on any kind of OCP flavor
  • reduce the blast radius in case of a sensitive material leak
  • separate trust to allow more granular control over client certificate authentication

 
Scenarios (mandatory) 

Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

  1. I would like to be able to run my workloads on any OpenShift-like platform.
    My workloads allow components to authenticate using client certificates based
    on a trust bundle that I am able to retrieve from the cluster.
  1. I don't want my users to have access to any CA bundle that would allow them
    to trust a random certificate from the cluster for client certificate authentication.

 
Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

Hypershift team needs to provide us with code reviews and merge the changes we are to deliver

Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

  • Development - OpenShift Auth, Hypershift
  • Documentation -OpenShift Auth Docs team
  • QE - OpenShift Auth QE
  • PX - I have no idea what PX is
  • Others - others

Acceptance Criteria (optional)

The serviceaccount CA bundle automatically injected to all pods cannot be used to authenticate any client certificate generated by the control-plane.

Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

Risk: there is a throbbing time pressure as this should be delivered before first stable Hypershift release

Done - Checklist (mandatory)

  • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
  • Documentation - Content development is complete.
  • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
  • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
  • Engineering Stories Merged
  • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
  • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

We plan to build Ironic Container Images using RHEL9 as base image in OCP 4.12

This is required because the ironic components have abandoned support for CentOS Stream 8 and Python 3.6/3.7 upstream during the most recent development cycle that will produce the stable Zed release, in favor of CentOS Stream 9 and Python 3.8/3.9

More info on RHEL8 to RHEL9 transition in OCP can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N8KyDY7KmgUYA9EOtDDQolebz0qi3nhT20IOn4D-xS4

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a SRE, I want hypershift operator to expose a metric when hosted control plane is ready. 

This should allow SRE to tune (or silence) alerts occurring while the hosted control plane is spinning up. 

 

 

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The Kube APIServer has a sidecar to output audit logs. We need similar sidecars for other APIServers that run on the control plane side. We also need to pass the same audit log policy that we pass to the KAS to these other API servers.

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Place holder epic to track spontaneous task which does not deserve its own epic.

AC:

We have connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs flag in konnectiviy socks5 proxy to dial directly to cloud providers without going through konnectivity.

This introduce another path for exception https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1722

We should consolidate both by keep using connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs until there's a reason to not.

 

Once the HostedCluster and NodePool gets stopped using PausedUntil statement, the awsprivatelink controller will continue reconciling.

 

How to test this:

  • Deploy a private cluster
  • Put it in pause once deployed
  • Delete the AWSEndPointService and the Service from the HCP namespace
  • And wait for a reconciliation, the result it's that they should not be recreated
  • Unpause it and wait for recreation.

DoD:

At the moment if the input etcd kms encryption (key and role) is invalid we fail transparently.

We should check that both key and role are compatible/operational for a given cluster and fail in a condition otherwise

AWS has a hard limit of 100 OIDC providers globally. 
Currently each HostedCluster created by e2e creates its own OIDC provider, which results in hitting the quota limit frequently and causing the tests to fail as a result.

 
DOD:
Only a single OIDC provider should be created and shared between all e2e HostedClusters. 

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem? 

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb  

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)   

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

Description of problem:

$ oc adm must-gather -- gather_ingress_node_firewall
[must-gather      ] OUT Using must-gather plug-in image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:3dec5a08681e11eedcd31f075941b74f777b9187f0e711a498a212f9d96adb2f
When opening a support case, bugzilla, or issue please include the following summary data along with any other requested information:
ClusterID: 0ef60b50-4378-431d-8ca2-faa5af098274
ClusterVersion: Stable at "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-26-111919"
ClusterOperators:
    clusteroperator/insights is not available (Reporting was not allowed: your Red Hat account is not enabled for remote support or your token has expired: UHC services authentication failed
) because Reporting was not allowed: your Red Hat account is not enabled for remote support or your token has expired: UHC services authentication failed[must-gather      ] OUT namespace/openshift-must-gather-fr7kc created
[must-gather      ] OUT clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/must-gather-xx2fh created
[must-gather      ] OUT pod for plug-in image quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:3dec5a08681e11eedcd31f075941b74f777b9187f0e711a498a212f9d96adb2f created
[must-gather-xvfj4] POD 2022-09-28T16:57:00.887445531Z /bin/bash: /usr/bin/gather_ingress_node_firewall: Permission denied
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT waiting for gather to complete
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT downloading gather output
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT receiving incremental file list
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT ./
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT 
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT sent 27 bytes  received 40 bytes  26.80 bytes/sec
[must-gather-xvfj4] OUT total size is 0  speedup is 0.00
[must-gather      ] OUT namespace/openshift-must-gather-fr7kc deleted
[must-gather      ] OUT clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/must-gather-xx2fh deleted
Reprinting Cluster State:
When opening a support case, bugzilla, or issue please include the following summary data along with any other requested information:
ClusterID: 0ef60b50-4378-431d-8ca2-faa5af098274
ClusterVersion: Stable at "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-26-111919"
ClusterOperators:
    clusteroperator/insights is not available (Reporting was not allowed: your Red Hat account is not enabled for remote support or your token has expired: UHC services authentication failed
) because Reporting was not allowed: your Red Hat account is not enabled for remote support or your token has expired: UHC services authentication failed

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5505. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The upgradeability check in CVO is throttled (essentially cached) for a nondeterministic period of time, same as the minimal sync period computed at runtime. The period can be up to 4 minutes, determined at CVO start time as 2minutes * (0..1 + 1). We agreed with Trevor that such throttling is unnecessarily aggressive (the check is not that expensive). It also causes CI flakes, because the matching test only has 3 minutes timeout. Additionally, the non-determinism and longer throttling results makes UX worse by actions done in the cluster may have their observable effect delayed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

discovered in 4.10 -> 4.11 upgrade jobs

How reproducible:

The test seems to flake ~10% of 4.10->4.11 Azure jobs (sippy). There does not seem to be that much impact on non-Azure jobs though which is a bit weird.

Steps to Reproduce:

Inspect the CVO log and E2E logs from failing jobs with the provided [^check-cvo.py] helper:

$ ./check-cvo.py cvo.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL

Preferably, inspect CVO logs of clusters that just underwent an upgrade (upgrades makes the original problematic behavior more likely to surface)

Actual results:

$ ./check-cvo.py openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-5b6966c474-g4kwk_cluster-version-operator.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL
FAIL: Cache hit at 11:59:55.332339 0:03:13.665006 after check at 11:56:41.667333
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:06:22.663215 0:03:13.664964 after check at 12:03:08.998251
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:12:49.997119 0:03:13.665598 after check at 12:09:36.331521
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:19:17.328510 0:03:13.664906 after check at 12:16:03.663604
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:25:44.662290 0:03:13.666759 after check at 12:22:30.995531
Upgradeability checks:           5
Upgradeability check cache hits: 12
FAIL

Note that the bug is probabilistic, so not all unfixed clusters will exhibit the behavior. My guess of the incidence rate is about 30-40%.

Expected result

$ ./check-cvo.py openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-7b8f85d455-mk9fs_cluster-version-operator.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL
Upgradeability checks:           12
Upgradeability check cache hits: 11
PASS

The actual numbers are not relevant (unless the upgradeabilily check count is zero, which means the test is not conclusive, the script warns about that), lack of failure is.

Additional info:

$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1607602927633960960/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/gather-extra/artifacts/pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-7b7d4b5bbd-zjqdt_cluster-version-operator.log | grep upgradeable.go
...
I1227 06:50:59.023190       1 upgradeable.go:122] Cluster current version=4.10.46
I1227 06:50:59.042735       1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later.
I1227 06:51:14.024345       1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later.
I1227 06:53:23.080768       1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later.
I1227 06:56:59.366010       1 upgradeable.go:122] Cluster current version=4.11.0-0.ci-2022-12-26-193640

$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1607602927633960960/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12'
Dec 27 06:51:15.319: INFO: Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired for "Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12 remove several APIs which require admin consideration. Please see the knowledge article https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for details and instructions." ...
Dec 27 06:54:15.413: FAIL: Error while waiting for Upgradeable to complain about AdminAckRequired with message "Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12 remove several APIs which require admin consideration. Please see the knowledge article https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for details and instructions.": timed out waiting for the condition
The test passes. Also, the "Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later." messages in CVO logs should never occur after a deterministic, short amount of time (I propose 1 minute) after upgradeability was checked.

I tested the throttling period in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/880. With the period of 15m, the test passrate was 4 of 9. Wiht the period of 1m, the test did not fail at all.

Some context in Slack thread

Description of problem:

We need to include the `openshift_apps_deploymentconfigs_strategy_total` metrics to the IO archive file.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a cluster
2. Download the IO archive
3. Check the file `config/metrics`
4. You must find `openshift_apps_deploymentconfigs_strategy_total` insde of it

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

You should see the `openshift_apps_deploymentconfigs_strategy_total` at the `config/metrics` file.

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6647. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Resource type drop-down menu item 'Last used' is in English

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Navigate to kube:admin -> User Preferences -> Applications
2. Click on Resource type dorp-down

Actual results:

Content is in English

Expected results:

Content should be in target language

Additional info:

Screenshot reference provided

When using an install-config with missing VIP values set in the baremetal-platform section, we attempt to get defaults for them by doing a DNS lookup on the cluster domain name. If this lookup fails, we set the error message from DNS as the default value, resulting in a very confusing error message:

[platform.baremetal.apiVIPs: Invalid value: []string{"DNS lookup failure: lookup api.test-cluster.test-domain on 10.0.80.11:53: no such host"}: ip <nil> is invalid, platform.baremetal.apiVIPs: Invalid value: "DNS lookup failure: lookup api.test-cluster.test-domain on 10.0.80.11:53: no such host": "DNS lookup failure: lookup api.test-cluster.test-domain on 10.0.80.11:53: no such host" is not a valid IP, platform.baremetal.apiVIPs: Invalid value: "DNS lookup failure: lookup api.test-cluster.test-domain on 10.0.80.11:53: no such host": IP expected to be in one of the machine networks: 192.168.122.0/23]

This has been the case since the inception of baremetal IPI, but it has gotten considerably worse in 4.12 due to the VIP fields changing from a single string to a list.

If the user doesn't supply a value and we can't generate a sensible default, we should report that the error is that they didn't supply a value, not that they supplied an invalid value that they did not in fact supply:

[platform.baremetal.apiVIPs: Required value: must specify at least one VIP for the API, platform.baremetal.apiVIPs: Required value: must specify VIP for API, when VIP for ingress is set]

Description of problem:
When the user runs:

openshift-install agent create image --dir cluster-manifests

But the manifests are either not in cluster-manifests or are missing, the error code generated by the tool leads users to believe that they are missing some tool dependency:

ERROR failed to write asset (Agent Installer ISO) to disk: image reader not available

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):4.11.0

How reproducible: 100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rm -fr /tmp/cluster-manifests && mkdir /tmp/cluster-manifests
2.openshift-install agent create image --dir cluster-manifests

Actual results:
ERROR failed to write asset (Agent Installer ISO) to disk: image reader not available

Expected results:
Error: Missing manifets in the specified cluster manifest directory: "/tmp/cluster-manifests"

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6222. The following is the description of the original issue:

Please review the following PR: https://github.com/openshift/alibaba-cloud-csi-driver/pull/20

The PR has been automatically opened by ART (#aos-art) team automation and indicates
that the image(s) being used downstream for production builds are not consistent
with the images referenced in this component's github repository.

Differences in upstream and downstream builds impact the fidelity of your CI signal.

If you disagree with the content of this PR, please contact @release-artists
in #aos-art to discuss the discrepancy.

Closing this issue without addressing the difference will cause the issue to
be reopened automatically.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7973. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

After destroyed the private cluster, the cluster's dns records left.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2023-02-26-022418 
4.13.0-0.nightly-2023-02-26-081527 

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.create a private cluster
2.destroy the cluster
3.check the dns record  
$ibmcloud dns zones | grep private-ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (base_domain)
3c7af30d-cc2c-4abc-94e1-3bcb36e01a9b   private-ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com     PENDING_NETWORK_ADD
$zone_id=3c7af30d-cc2c-4abc-94e1-3bcb36e01a9b
$ibmcloud dns resource-records $zone_id
CNAME:520c532f-ca61-40eb-a04e-1a2569c14a0b   api-int.ci-op-wkb4fgd6-eef7e.private-ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com   CNAME   60    10a7a6c7-jp-tok.lb.appdomain.cloud   
CNAME:751cf3ce-06fc-4daf-8a44-bf1a8540dc60   api.ci-op-wkb4fgd6-eef7e.private-ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com       CNAME   60    10a7a6c7-jp-tok.lb.appdomain.cloud   
CNAME:dea469e3-01cd-462f-85e3-0c1e6423b107   *.apps.ci-op-wkb4fgd6-eef7e.private-ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com    CNAME   120   395ec2b3-jp-tok.lb.appdomain.cloud 

Actual results:

the dns records of the cluster were left

Expected results:

created dns record by installer are all deleted, after destroyed the cluster

Additional info:

this block create private cluster later, caused the maximum limit of 5 wildcard records are easily reached. (qe account limitation)
checking the *ingress-operator.log of the failed cluster, got the error: "createOrUpdateDNSRecord: failed to create the dns record: Reached the maximum limit of 5 wildcard records."

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5548. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
This is a follow-up on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 and https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390

When creating a Deployment, DeploymentConfig, or Knative Service with enabled Pipeline, and then deleting it again with the enabled option "Delete other resources created by console" (only available on 4.13+ with the PR above) the automatically created Pipeline is not deleted.

When the user tries to create the same resource with a Pipeline again this fails with an error:

An error occurred
secrets "nodeinfo-generic-webhook-secret" already exists

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.13

(we might want to backport this together with https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12390 and OCPBUGS-5547)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install OpenShift Pipelines operator (tested with 1.8.2)
  2. Create a new project
  3. Navigate to Add > Import from git and create an application
  4. Case 1: In the topology select the new resource and delete it
  5. Case 2: In the topology select the application group and delete the complete app

Actual results:
Case 1: Delete resources:

  1. Deployment (tries it twice!) $name
  2. Service $name
  3. Route $name
  4. ImageStream $name

Case 2: Delete application:

  1. Deployment (just once) $name
  2. Service $name
  3. Route $name
  4. ImageStream $name

Expected results:
Case 1: Delete resource:

  1. Delete Deployment $name should be called just once
  2. (Keep this deletion) Service $name
  3. (Keep this deletion) Route $name
  4. (Keep this deletion) ImageStream $name
  5. Missing deletion of the Tekton Pipeline $name
  6. Missing deletion of the Tekton TriggerTemplate with generated name trigger-template-$name-$random
  7. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret
  8. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

Case 2: Delete application:

  1. (Keep this deletion) Deployment $name
  2. (Keep this deletion) Service $name
  3. (Keep this deletion) Route $name
  4. (Keep this deletion) ImageStream $name
  5. Missing deletion of the Tekton Pipeline $name
  6. Missing deletion of the Tekton TriggerTemplate with generated name trigger-template-$name-$random
  7. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-generic-webhook-secret
  8. Missing deletion of the Secret $name-github-webhook-secret

Additional info:

The 4.12 builds fail all the time. Last successfully build was from May 31.

Error:

# Root Suite.Entire pipeline flow from Builder page "before all" hook for "Background Steps"
AssertionError: Timed out retrying after 80000ms: Expected to find element: `[data-test-id="PipelineResource"]`, but never found it.

Full error:

  Running:  e2e/pipeline-ci.feature                                                         (1 of 1)
Couldn't determine Mocha version


  Logging in as kubeadmin
      Installing operator: "Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines"
      Operator Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines was not yet installed.
      Performing Pipelines post-installation steps
      Verify the CRD's for the "Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines"
  1) "before all" hook for "Background Steps"
      Deleting "" namespace

  0 passing (3m)
  1 failing

  1) Entire pipeline flow from Builder page
       "before all" hook for "Background Steps":
     AssertionError: Timed out retrying after 80000ms: Expected to find element: `[data-test-id="PipelineResource"]`, but never found it.

Because this error occurred during a `before all` hook we are skipping all of the remaining tests.
      at ../../dev-console/integration-tests/support/pages/functions/installOperatorOnCluster.ts.exports.waitForCRDs (https://console-openshift-console.apps.ci-op-issiwkzy-bc347.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/__cypress/tests?p=support/commands/index.ts:17156:77)
      at performPostInstallationSteps (https://console-openshift-console.apps.ci-op-issiwkzy-bc347.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/__cypress/tests?p=support/commands/index.ts:17242:21)
      at ../../dev-console/integration-tests/support/pages/functions/installOperatorOnCluster.ts.exports.verifyAndInstallOperator (https://console-openshift-console.apps.ci-op-issiwkzy-bc347.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/__cypress/tests?p=support/commands/index.ts:17268:5)
      at ../../dev-console/integration-tests/support/pages/functions/installOperatorOnCluster.ts.exports.verifyAndInstallPipelinesOperator (https://console-openshift-console.apps.ci-op-issiwkzy-bc347.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/__cypress/tests?p=support/commands/index.ts:17272:13)
      at Context.eval (https://console-openshift-console.apps.ci-op-issiwkzy-bc347.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/__cypress/tests?p=support/commands/index.ts:20848:13)



[mochawesome] Report JSON saved to /go/src/github.com/openshift/console/frontend/gui_test_screenshots/cypress_report_pipelines.json


  (Results)

  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │ Tests:        13                                                                               │
  │ Passing:      0                                                                                │
  │ Failing:      1                                                                                │
  │ Pending:      0                                                                                │
  │ Skipped:      12                                                                               │
  │ Screenshots:  1                                                                                │
  │ Video:        true                                                                             │
  │ Duration:     2 minutes, 58 seconds                                                            │
  │ Spec Ran:     e2e/pipeline-ci.feature                                                          │
  └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


  (Screenshots)

  -  /go/src/github.com/openshift/console/frontend/gui_test_screenshots/cypress/scree     (1280x720)
     nshots/e2e/pipeline-ci.feature/Background Steps -- before all hook (failed).png                


  (Video)

  -  Started processing:  Compressing to 32 CRF                                                     
  -  Finished processing: /go/src/github.com/openshift/console/frontend/gui_test_scre   (16 seconds)
                          enshots/cypress/videos/e2e/pipeline-ci.feature.mp4                        

    Compression progress:  100%

====================================================================================================

  (Run Finished)


       Spec                                              Tests  Passing  Failing  Pending  Skipped  
  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │ ✖  e2e/pipeline-ci.feature                  02:58       13        -        1        -       12 │
  └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
    ✖  1 of 1 failed (100%)                     02:58       13        -        1        -       12  

See also

  1. https://prow.ci.openshift.org/job-history/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/directory/pull-ci-openshift-console-release-4.12-e2e-gcp-console
  2. https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=Expected+to+find+element&maxAge=336h&context=1&type=all&name=pull-ci-openshift-console-release-4.12-e2e-gcp-console&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job (not exact match, but couldn't create a better filter)

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13150. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12435. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

If the user specifies a DNS name in an egressnetworkpolicy for which the upstream server returns a truncated DNS response, openshift-sdn does not fall back to TCP as expected but just take this as a failure.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11 (originally reproduced on 4.9)

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup an EgressNetworkPolicy that points to a domain where a truncated response is returned while querying via UDP.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Error, DNS resolution not completed.

Expected results:

Request retried via TCP and succeeded.

Additional info:

In comments.

Description of problem:
pkg/devfile/sample_test.go fails after devfile registry was updated (https://github.com/devfile/registry/pull/126)

This issue is about updating our assertion so that the CI job runs successfully again. We might want to backport this as well.

OCPBUGS-1678 is about updating the code that the test should use a mock response instead of the latest registry content OR check some specific attributes instead of comparing the full JSON response.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Clone openshift/console
2. Run ./test-backend.sh

Actual results:
Unit tests fail

Expected results:
Unit tests should pass again

Additional info:

Job was in terrible shape even before but it looks like upgrade started more consistently failing around Oct 2-4.

Sample failed run: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade-ovn-ipv6/1579289246391341056

Looks like we fully lose the api (service unavailable), no artifacts get gathered, mass disruption reported.

Console should be using v1 version of the ConsolePlugin model rather then the old v1alpha1.

CONSOLE-3077 was updating this version, but did not made the cut for the 4.12 release. Based on discussion with Samuel Padgett we should be backporting to 4.12.

 

The risk should be minimal since we are only updating the model itself + validation + Readme

Description of problem:

We got a feedback from the support team that it is confusing to see switch in the Notifications column for the Alerting rule which have no alerts associated to it as user can not silence the Alerting rule. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. oc apply -f https://gist.githubusercontent.com/vikram-raj/727629797eb9d9bfcfa2721cae2ade86/raw/7c2305e14115a1a4f4f88ebb74cdad32cbec4132/Alerting%2520rule%2520without%2520alert 
2. navigate to the Developer perspective Observe -> Alerts
3. Try to silence the VersionAlert alerting rule, nothing will happen 

Actual results:

Silence the alerting rule using the switch will do nothing

Expected results:

No switch for silence the alerting rule should be visible if no alerts are associated to the alerting rule.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Installing 1000+ SNOs via ACM/MCE via ZTP with gitops, a small percentage of clusters end up never completing install because the monitoring operator does not reconcile to available.

# oc --kubeconfig=/root/hv-vm/sno/manifests/sno01219/kubeconfig get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version             False       True          16h     Unable to apply 4.11.0: the cluster operator monitoring has not yet successfully rolled out
# oc --kubeconfig=/root/hv-vm/sno/manifests/sno01219/kubeconfig get co monitoring
NAME         VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
monitoring             False       True          True       15h     Rollout of the monitoring stack failed and is degraded. Please investigate the degraded status error. 

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

  • Hub OCP and SNO OCP - 4.11.0
  • ACM - 2.6.0-DOWNSTREAM-2022-08-11-23-41-09  (FC5)

 

How reproducible:

  • 2 out of 23 failures out of 1728 installs
  • ~8% of the failures are because of this issue
  • failure rate of ~.1% of the total installs

 

Additional info:

 

# oc --kubeconfig=/root/hv-vm/sno/manifests/sno01219/kubeconfig get po -n openshift-monitoring
NAME                                                     READY   STATUS              RESTARTS   AGE
alertmanager-main-0                                      0/6     ContainerCreating   0          15h
cluster-monitoring-operator-54dd78cc74-l5w24             2/2     Running             0          15h
kube-state-metrics-b6455c4dc-8hcfn                       3/3     Running             0          15h
node-exporter-k7899                                      2/2     Running             0          15h
openshift-state-metrics-7984888fbd-cl67v                 3/3     Running             0          15h
prometheus-adapter-785bf4f975-wgmnh                      1/1     Running             0          15h
prometheus-k8s-0                                         0/6     Init:0/1            0          15h
prometheus-operator-74d8754ff7-9zrgw                     2/2     Running             0          15h
prometheus-operator-admission-webhook-6665fb687d-c5jgv   1/1     Running             0          15h
thanos-querier-575496c665-jcc8l                          6/6     Running             0          15h 
# oc --kubeconfig=/root/hv-vm/sno/manifests/sno01219/kubeconfig describe po -n openshift-monitoring alertmanager-main-0
Name:                 alertmanager-main-0
Namespace:            openshift-monitoring
Priority:             2000000000
Priority Class Name:  system-cluster-critical
Node:                 sno01219/fc00:1001::8aa
Start Time:           Mon, 15 Aug 2022 23:53:39 +0000
Labels:               alertmanager=main
                      app.kubernetes.io/component=alert-router
                      app.kubernetes.io/instance=main
                      app.kubernetes.io/managed-by=prometheus-operator
                      app.kubernetes.io/name=alertmanager
                      app.kubernetes.io/part-of=openshift-monitoring
                      app.kubernetes.io/version=0.24.0
                      controller-revision-hash=alertmanager-main-fcf8dd5fb
                      statefulset.kubernetes.io/pod-name=alertmanager-main-0
Annotations:          kubectl.kubernetes.io/default-container: alertmanager
                      openshift.io/scc: nonroot
Status:               Pending
IP:
IPs:                  <none>
Controlled By:        StatefulSet/alertmanager-main
Containers:
  alertmanager:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:91308d35c1e56463f55c1aaa519ff4de7335d43b254c21abdb845fc8c72821a1
    Image ID:
    Ports:         9094/TCP, 9094/UDP
    Host Ports:    0/TCP, 0/UDP
    Args:
      --config.file=/etc/alertmanager/config/alertmanager.yaml
      --storage.path=/alertmanager
      --data.retention=120h
      --cluster.listen-address=
      --web.listen-address=127.0.0.1:9093
      --web.external-url=https:/console-openshift-console.apps.sno01219.rdu2.scalelab.redhat.com/monitoring
      --web.route-prefix=/
      --cluster.peer=alertmanager-main-0.alertmanager-operated:9094
      --cluster.reconnect-timeout=5m
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       ContainerCreating
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:     4m
      memory:  40Mi
    Environment:
      POD_IP:   (v1:status.podIP)
    Mounts:
      /alertmanager from alertmanager-main-db (rw)
      /etc/alertmanager/certs from tls-assets (ro)
      /etc/alertmanager/config from config-volume (rw)
      /etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy from secret-alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy (ro)
      /etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy-metric from secret-alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy-metric (ro)
      /etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-main-proxy from secret-alertmanager-main-proxy (ro)
      /etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-main-tls from secret-alertmanager-main-tls (ro)
      /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/pem/ from alertmanager-trusted-ca-bundle (ro)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-hl77l (ro)
  config-reloader:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:209e20410ec2d3d7a502f568d2b7fe1cd1beadcb36fff2d1e6f59d77be3200e3
    Image ID:
    Port:          <none>
    Host Port:     <none>
    Command:
      /bin/prometheus-config-reloader
    Args:
      --listen-address=localhost:8080
      --reload-url=http://localhost:9093/-/reload
      --watched-dir=/etc/alertmanager/config
      --watched-dir=/etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-main-tls
      --watched-dir=/etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-main-proxy
      --watched-dir=/etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy
      --watched-dir=/etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy-metric
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       ContainerCreating
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:     1m
      memory:  10Mi
    Environment:
      POD_NAME:  alertmanager-main-0 (v1:metadata.name)
      SHARD:     -1
    Mounts:
      /etc/alertmanager/config from config-volume (ro)
      /etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy from secret-alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy (ro)
      /etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy-metric from secret-alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy-metric (ro)
      /etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-main-proxy from secret-alertmanager-main-proxy (ro)
      /etc/alertmanager/secrets/alertmanager-main-tls from secret-alertmanager-main-tls (ro)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-hl77l (ro)
  alertmanager-proxy:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:140f8947593d92e1517e50a201e83bdef8eb965b552a21d3caf346a250d0cf6e
    Image ID:
    Port:          9095/TCP
    Host Port:     0/TCP
    Args:
      -provider=openshift
      -https-address=:9095
      -http-address=
      -email-domain=*
      -upstream=http://localhost:9093
      -openshift-sar=[{"resource": "namespaces", "verb": "get"}, {"resource": "alertmanagers", "resourceAPIGroup": "monitoring.coreos.com", "namespace": "openshift-monitoring", "verb": "patch", "resourceName": "non-existant"}]
      -openshift-delegate-urls={"/": {"resource": "namespaces", "verb": "get"}, "/": {"resource":"alertmanagers", "group": "monitoring.coreos.com", "namespace": "openshift-monitoring", "verb": "patch", "name": "non-existant"}}
      -tls-cert=/etc/tls/private/tls.crt
      -tls-key=/etc/tls/private/tls.key
      -client-secret-file=/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token
      -cookie-secret-file=/etc/proxy/secrets/session_secret
      -openshift-service-account=alertmanager-main
      -openshift-ca=/etc/pki/tls/cert.pem
      -openshift-ca=/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/ca.crt
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       ContainerCreating
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:     1m
      memory:  20Mi
    Environment:
      HTTP_PROXY:
      HTTPS_PROXY:
      NO_PROXY:
    Mounts:
      /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/pem/ from alertmanager-trusted-ca-bundle (ro)
      /etc/proxy/secrets from secret-alertmanager-main-proxy (rw)
      /etc/tls/private from secret-alertmanager-main-tls (rw)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-hl77l (ro)
  kube-rbac-proxy:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:b5e1c69d005727e3245604cfca7a63e4f9bc6e15128c7489e41d5e967305089e
    Image ID:
    Port:          9092/TCP
    Host Port:     0/TCP
    Args:
      --secure-listen-address=0.0.0.0:9092
      --upstream=http://127.0.0.1:9096
      --config-file=/etc/kube-rbac-proxy/config.yaml
      --tls-cert-file=/etc/tls/private/tls.crt
      --tls-private-key-file=/etc/tls/private/tls.key
      --tls-cipher-suites=TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
      --logtostderr=true
      --tls-min-version=VersionTLS12
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       ContainerCreating
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:        1m
      memory:     15Mi
    Environment:  <none>
    Mounts:
      /etc/kube-rbac-proxy from secret-alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy (rw)
      /etc/tls/private from secret-alertmanager-main-tls (rw)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-hl77l (ro)
  kube-rbac-proxy-metric:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:b5e1c69d005727e3245604cfca7a63e4f9bc6e15128c7489e41d5e967305089e
    Image ID:
    Port:          9097/TCP
    Host Port:     0/TCP
    Args:
      --secure-listen-address=0.0.0.0:9097
      --upstream=http://127.0.0.1:9093
      --config-file=/etc/kube-rbac-proxy/config.yaml
      --tls-cert-file=/etc/tls/private/tls.crt
      --tls-private-key-file=/etc/tls/private/tls.key
      --tls-cipher-suites=TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
      --client-ca-file=/etc/tls/client/client-ca.crt
      --logtostderr=true
      --allow-paths=/metrics
      --tls-min-version=VersionTLS12
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       ContainerCreating
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:        1m
      memory:     15Mi
    Environment:  <none>
    Mounts:
      /etc/kube-rbac-proxy from secret-alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy-metric (ro)
      /etc/tls/client from metrics-client-ca (ro)
      /etc/tls/private from secret-alertmanager-main-tls (ro)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-hl77l (ro)
  prom-label-proxy:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:2550b2cbdf864515b1edacf43c25eb6b6f179713c1df34e51f6e9bba48d6430a
    Image ID:
    Port:          <none>
    Host Port:     <none>
    Args:
      --insecure-listen-address=127.0.0.1:9096
      --upstream=http://127.0.0.1:9093
      --label=namespace
      --error-on-replace
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       ContainerCreating
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:        1m
      memory:     20Mi
    Environment:  <none>
    Mounts:
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-hl77l (ro)
Conditions:
  Type              Status
  Initialized       True
  Ready             False
  ContainersReady   False
  PodScheduled      True
Volumes:
  config-volume:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  alertmanager-main-generated
    Optional:    false
  tls-assets:
    Type:                Projected (a volume that contains injected data from multiple sources)
    SecretName:          alertmanager-main-tls-assets-0
    SecretOptionalName:  <nil>
  secret-alertmanager-main-tls:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  alertmanager-main-tls
    Optional:    false
  secret-alertmanager-main-proxy:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  alertmanager-main-proxy
    Optional:    false
  secret-alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy
    Optional:    false
  secret-alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy-metric:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  alertmanager-kube-rbac-proxy-metric
    Optional:    false
  alertmanager-main-db:
    Type:       EmptyDir (a temporary directory that shares a pod's lifetime)
    Medium:
    SizeLimit:  <unset>
  metrics-client-ca:
    Type:      ConfigMap (a volume populated by a ConfigMap)
    Name:      metrics-client-ca
    Optional:  false
  alertmanager-trusted-ca-bundle:
    Type:      ConfigMap (a volume populated by a ConfigMap)
    Name:      alertmanager-trusted-ca-bundle-2rsonso43rc5p
    Optional:  true
  kube-api-access-hl77l:
    Type:                    Projected (a volume that contains injected data from multiple sources)
    TokenExpirationSeconds:  3607
    ConfigMapName:           kube-root-ca.crt
    ConfigMapOptional:       <nil>
    DownwardAPI:             true
    ConfigMapName:           openshift-service-ca.crt
    ConfigMapOptional:       <nil>
QoS Class:                   Burstable
Node-Selectors:              kubernetes.io/os=linux
Tolerations:                 node.kubernetes.io/memory-pressure:NoSchedule op=Exists
                             node.kubernetes.io/not-ready:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s
                             node.kubernetes.io/unreachable:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age                    From     Message
  ----     ------                  ----                   ----     -------
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  2m25s (x409 over 15h)  kubelet  (combined from similar events): Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_alertmanager-main-0_openshift-monitoring_1c367a83-24e3-4249-861a-a107a6beaee2_0(dff5f302f774d060728261b3c86841ebdbd7ba11537ec9f4d90d57be17bdf44b): error adding pod openshift-monitoring_alertmanager-main-0 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): [openshift-monitoring/alertmanager-main-0/1c367a83-24e3-4249-861a-a107a6beaee2:ovn-kubernetes]: error adding container to network "ovn-kubernetes": CNI request failed with status 400: '[openshift-monitoring/alertmanager-main-0 dff5f302f774d060728261b3c86841ebdbd7ba11537ec9f4d90d57be17bdf44b] [openshift-monitoring/alertmanager-main-0 dff5f302f774d060728261b3c86841ebdbd7ba11537ec9f4d90d57be17bdf44b] failed to get pod annotation: timed out waiting for annotations: context deadline exceeded                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
 oc --kubeconfig=/root/hv-vm/sno/manifests/sno01219/kubeconfig describe po -n openshift-monitoring prometheus-k8s-0
Name:                 prometheus-k8s-0
Namespace:            openshift-monitoring
Priority:             2000000000
Priority Class Name:  system-cluster-critical
Node:                 sno01219/fc00:1001::8aa
Start Time:           Mon, 15 Aug 2022 23:53:39 +0000
Labels:               app.kubernetes.io/component=prometheus
                      app.kubernetes.io/instance=k8s
                      app.kubernetes.io/managed-by=prometheus-operator
                      app.kubernetes.io/name=prometheus
                      app.kubernetes.io/part-of=openshift-monitoring
                      app.kubernetes.io/version=2.36.2
                      controller-revision-hash=prometheus-k8s-546b544f8b
                      operator.prometheus.io/name=k8s
                      operator.prometheus.io/shard=0
                      prometheus=k8s
                      statefulset.kubernetes.io/pod-name=prometheus-k8s-0
Annotations:          kubectl.kubernetes.io/default-container: prometheus
                      openshift.io/scc: nonroot
Status:               Pending
IP:
IPs:                  <none>
Controlled By:        StatefulSet/prometheus-k8s
Init Containers:
  init-config-reloader:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:209e20410ec2d3d7a502f568d2b7fe1cd1beadcb36fff2d1e6f59d77be3200e3
    Image ID:
    Port:          8080/TCP
    Host Port:     0/TCP
    Command:
      /bin/prometheus-config-reloader
    Args:
      --watch-interval=0
      --listen-address=:8080
      --config-file=/etc/prometheus/config/prometheus.yaml.gz
      --config-envsubst-file=/etc/prometheus/config_out/prometheus.env.yaml
      --watched-dir=/etc/prometheus/rules/prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       PodInitializing
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:     1m
      memory:  10Mi
    Environment:
      POD_NAME:  prometheus-k8s-0 (v1:metadata.name)
      SHARD:     0
    Mounts:
      /etc/prometheus/config from config (rw)
      /etc/prometheus/config_out from config-out (rw)
      /etc/prometheus/rules/prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0 from prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0 (rw)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-85zlc (ro)
Containers:
  prometheus:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:c7df53b796e81ba8301ba74d02317226329bd5752fd31c1b44d028e4832f21c3
    Image ID:
    Port:          <none>
    Host Port:     <none>
    Args:
      --web.console.templates=/etc/prometheus/consoles
      --web.console.libraries=/etc/prometheus/console_libraries
      --storage.tsdb.retention.time=15d
      --config.file=/etc/prometheus/config_out/prometheus.env.yaml
      --storage.tsdb.path=/prometheus
      --web.enable-lifecycle
      --web.external-url=https:/console-openshift-console.apps.sno01219.rdu2.scalelab.redhat.com/monitoring
      --web.route-prefix=/
      --web.listen-address=127.0.0.1:9090
      --web.config.file=/etc/prometheus/web_config/web-config.yaml
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       PodInitializing
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:        70m
      memory:     1Gi
    Liveness:     exec [sh -c if [ -x "$(command -v curl)" ]; then exec curl --fail http://localhost:9090/-/healthy; elif [ -x "$(command -v wget)" ]; then exec wget -q -O /dev/null http://localhost:9090/-/healthy; else exit 1; fi] delay=0s timeout=3s period=5s #success=1 #failure=6
    Readiness:    exec [sh -c if [ -x "$(command -v curl)" ]; then exec curl --fail http://localhost:9090/-/ready; elif [ -x "$(command -v wget)" ]; then exec wget -q -O /dev/null http://localhost:9090/-/ready; else exit 1; fi] delay=0s timeout=3s period=5s #success=1 #failure=3
    Startup:      exec [sh -c if [ -x "$(command -v curl)" ]; then exec curl --fail http://localhost:9090/-/ready; elif [ -x "$(command -v wget)" ]; then exec wget -q -O /dev/null http://localhost:9090/-/ready; else exit 1; fi] delay=0s timeout=3s period=15s #success=1 #failure=60
    Environment:  <none>
    Mounts:
      /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/pem/ from prometheus-trusted-ca-bundle (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/certs from tls-assets (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/config_out from config-out (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/configmaps/kubelet-serving-ca-bundle from configmap-kubelet-serving-ca-bundle (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/configmaps/metrics-client-ca from configmap-metrics-client-ca (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/configmaps/serving-certs-ca-bundle from configmap-serving-certs-ca-bundle (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/rules/prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0 from prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0 (rw)
      /etc/prometheus/secrets/kube-etcd-client-certs from secret-kube-etcd-client-certs (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/secrets/kube-rbac-proxy from secret-kube-rbac-proxy (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/secrets/metrics-client-certs from secret-metrics-client-certs (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/secrets/prometheus-k8s-proxy from secret-prometheus-k8s-proxy (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/secrets/prometheus-k8s-thanos-sidecar-tls from secret-prometheus-k8s-thanos-sidecar-tls (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/secrets/prometheus-k8s-tls from secret-prometheus-k8s-tls (ro)
      /etc/prometheus/web_config/web-config.yaml from web-config (ro,path="web-config.yaml")
      /prometheus from prometheus-k8s-db (rw)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-85zlc (ro)
  config-reloader:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:209e20410ec2d3d7a502f568d2b7fe1cd1beadcb36fff2d1e6f59d77be3200e3
    Image ID:
    Port:          <none>
    Host Port:     <none>
    Command:
      /bin/prometheus-config-reloader
    Args:
      --listen-address=localhost:8080
      --reload-url=http://localhost:9090/-/reload
      --config-file=/etc/prometheus/config/prometheus.yaml.gz
      --config-envsubst-file=/etc/prometheus/config_out/prometheus.env.yaml
      --watched-dir=/etc/prometheus/rules/prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       PodInitializing
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:     1m
      memory:  10Mi
    Environment:
      POD_NAME:  prometheus-k8s-0 (v1:metadata.name)
      SHARD:     0
    Mounts:
      /etc/prometheus/config from config (rw)
      /etc/prometheus/config_out from config-out (rw)
      /etc/prometheus/rules/prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0 from prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0 (rw)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-85zlc (ro)
  thanos-sidecar:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:36fc214537c763b3a3f0a9dc7a1bd4378a80428c31b2629df8786a9b09155e6d
    Image ID:
    Ports:         10902/TCP, 10901/TCP
    Host Ports:    0/TCP, 0/TCP
    Args:
      sidecar
      --prometheus.url=http://localhost:9090/
      --tsdb.path=/prometheus
      --http-address=127.0.0.1:10902
      --grpc-server-tls-cert=/etc/tls/grpc/server.crt
      --grpc-server-tls-key=/etc/tls/grpc/server.key
      --grpc-server-tls-client-ca=/etc/tls/grpc/ca.crt
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       PodInitializing
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:        1m
      memory:     25Mi
    Environment:  <none>
    Mounts:
      /etc/tls/grpc from secret-grpc-tls (rw)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-85zlc (ro)
  prometheus-proxy:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:140f8947593d92e1517e50a201e83bdef8eb965b552a21d3caf346a250d0cf6e
    Image ID:
    Port:          9091/TCP
    Host Port:     0/TCP
    Args:
      -provider=openshift
      -https-address=:9091
      -http-address=
      -email-domain=*
      -upstream=http://localhost:9090
      -openshift-service-account=prometheus-k8s
      -openshift-sar={"resource": "namespaces", "verb": "get"}
      -openshift-delegate-urls={"/": {"resource": "namespaces", "verb": "get"}}
      -tls-cert=/etc/tls/private/tls.crt
      -tls-key=/etc/tls/private/tls.key
      -client-secret-file=/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token
      -cookie-secret-file=/etc/proxy/secrets/session_secret
      -openshift-ca=/etc/pki/tls/cert.pem
      -openshift-ca=/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/ca.crt
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       PodInitializing
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:     1m
      memory:  20Mi
    Environment:
      HTTP_PROXY:
      HTTPS_PROXY:
      NO_PROXY:
    Mounts:
      /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/pem/ from prometheus-trusted-ca-bundle (ro)
      /etc/proxy/secrets from secret-prometheus-k8s-proxy (rw)
      /etc/tls/private from secret-prometheus-k8s-tls (rw)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-85zlc (ro)
  kube-rbac-proxy:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:b5e1c69d005727e3245604cfca7a63e4f9bc6e15128c7489e41d5e967305089e
    Image ID:
    Port:          9092/TCP
    Host Port:     0/TCP
    Args:
      --secure-listen-address=0.0.0.0:9092
      --upstream=http://127.0.0.1:9090
      --allow-paths=/metrics
      --config-file=/etc/kube-rbac-proxy/config.yaml
      --tls-cert-file=/etc/tls/private/tls.crt
      --tls-private-key-file=/etc/tls/private/tls.key
      --client-ca-file=/etc/tls/client/client-ca.crt
      --tls-cipher-suites=TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
      --logtostderr=true
      --tls-min-version=VersionTLS12
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       PodInitializing
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:        1m
      memory:     15Mi
    Environment:  <none>
    Mounts:
      /etc/kube-rbac-proxy from secret-kube-rbac-proxy (rw)
      /etc/tls/client from configmap-metrics-client-ca (ro)
      /etc/tls/private from secret-prometheus-k8s-tls (rw)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-85zlc (ro)
  kube-rbac-proxy-thanos:
    Container ID:
    Image:         quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:b5e1c69d005727e3245604cfca7a63e4f9bc6e15128c7489e41d5e967305089e
    Image ID:
    Port:          10902/TCP
    Host Port:     0/TCP
    Args:
      --secure-listen-address=[$(POD_IP)]:10902
      --upstream=http://127.0.0.1:10902
      --tls-cert-file=/etc/tls/private/tls.crt
      --tls-private-key-file=/etc/tls/private/tls.key
      --client-ca-file=/etc/tls/client/client-ca.crt
      --config-file=/etc/kube-rbac-proxy/config.yaml
      --tls-cipher-suites=TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
      --allow-paths=/metrics
      --logtostderr=true
      --tls-min-version=VersionTLS12
      --client-ca-file=/etc/tls/client/client-ca.crt
    State:          Waiting
      Reason:       PodInitializing
    Ready:          False
    Restart Count:  0
    Requests:
      cpu:     1m
      memory:  10Mi
    Environment:
      POD_IP:   (v1:status.podIP)
    Mounts:
      /etc/kube-rbac-proxy from secret-kube-rbac-proxy (rw)
      /etc/tls/client from metrics-client-ca (ro)
      /etc/tls/private from secret-prometheus-k8s-thanos-sidecar-tls (rw)
      /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-85zlc (ro)
Conditions:
  Type              Status
  Initialized       False
  Ready             False
  ContainersReady   False
  PodScheduled      True
Volumes:
  config:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  prometheus-k8s
    Optional:    false
  tls-assets:
    Type:                Projected (a volume that contains injected data from multiple sources)
    SecretName:          prometheus-k8s-tls-assets-0
    SecretOptionalName:  <nil>
  config-out:
    Type:       EmptyDir (a temporary directory that shares a pod's lifetime)
    Medium:
    SizeLimit:  <unset>
  prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0:
    Type:      ConfigMap (a volume populated by a ConfigMap)
    Name:      prometheus-k8s-rulefiles-0
    Optional:  false
  web-config:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  prometheus-k8s-web-config
    Optional:    false
  secret-kube-etcd-client-certs:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  kube-etcd-client-certs
    Optional:    false
  secret-prometheus-k8s-tls:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  prometheus-k8s-tls
    Optional:    false
  secret-prometheus-k8s-proxy:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  prometheus-k8s-proxy
    Optional:    false
  secret-prometheus-k8s-thanos-sidecar-tls:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  prometheus-k8s-thanos-sidecar-tls
    Optional:    false
  secret-kube-rbac-proxy:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  kube-rbac-proxy
    Optional:    false
  secret-metrics-client-certs:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  metrics-client-certs
    Optional:    false
  configmap-serving-certs-ca-bundle:
    Type:      ConfigMap (a volume populated by a ConfigMap)
    Name:      serving-certs-ca-bundle
    Optional:  false
  configmap-kubelet-serving-ca-bundle:
    Type:      ConfigMap (a volume populated by a ConfigMap)
    Name:      kubelet-serving-ca-bundle
    Optional:  false
  configmap-metrics-client-ca:
    Type:      ConfigMap (a volume populated by a ConfigMap)
    Name:      metrics-client-ca
    Optional:  false
  prometheus-k8s-db:
    Type:       EmptyDir (a temporary directory that shares a pod's lifetime)
    Medium:
    SizeLimit:  <unset>
  metrics-client-ca:
    Type:      ConfigMap (a volume populated by a ConfigMap)
    Name:      metrics-client-ca
    Optional:  false
  secret-grpc-tls:
    Type:        Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
    SecretName:  prometheus-k8s-grpc-tls-crdkohb1gb92n
    Optional:    false
  prometheus-trusted-ca-bundle:
    Type:      ConfigMap (a volume populated by a ConfigMap)
    Name:      prometheus-trusted-ca-bundle-2rsonso43rc5p
    Optional:  true
  kube-api-access-85zlc:
    Type:                    Projected (a volume that contains injected data from multiple sources)
    TokenExpirationSeconds:  3607
    ConfigMapName:           kube-root-ca.crt
    ConfigMapOptional:       <nil>
    DownwardAPI:             true
    ConfigMapName:           openshift-service-ca.crt
    ConfigMapOptional:       <nil>
QoS Class:                   Burstable
Node-Selectors:              kubernetes.io/os=linux
Tolerations:                 node.kubernetes.io/memory-pressure:NoSchedule op=Exists
                             node.kubernetes.io/not-ready:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s
                             node.kubernetes.io/unreachable:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age                    From     Message
  ----     ------                  ----                   ----     -------
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  4m19s (x409 over 15h)  kubelet  (combined from similar events): Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_prometheus-k8s-0_openshift-monitoring_debda4d2-6914-4b36-92e0-78f68d539ab3_0(86af91d4e64ab0fbad95352b029762e9856ff24005445b458bccb22e0ee9b655): error adding pod openshift-monitoring_prometheus-k8s-0 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): [openshift-monitoring/prometheus-k8s-0/debda4d2-6914-4b36-92e0-78f68d539ab3:ovn-kubernetes]: error adding container to network "ovn-kubernetes": CNI request failed with status 400: '[openshift-monitoring/prometheus-k8s-0 86af91d4e64ab0fbad95352b029762e9856ff24005445b458bccb22e0ee9b655] [openshift-monitoring/prometheus-k8s-0 86af91d4e64ab0fbad95352b029762e9856ff24005445b458bccb22e0ee9b655] failed to get pod annotation: timed out waiting for annotations: context deadline exceeded

Both pods in error state seem to be waiting on this issue "failed to get pod annotation: timed out waiting for annotations: context deadline exceeded"

Description of problem:

The TestReloadInterval E2E test has completely wrong validations in which the min value should be 1s, not 5s.

But there is a race condition which allow these tests to sometimes pass due to the last test condition.

Therefore, failures in CI are actually correct, and successes are wrong based on the E2E conditions.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

50%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Run TestReloadInterval E2E test (make test-e2e TEST=TestReloadInterval)

Actual results:

Sometimes fails on 5us test case:

reloadinterval_test.go:106: router deployment not updated with RELOAD_INTERVAL=5s: timed out waiting for the condition

Expected results:

Should pass E2E

Additional info:

 

 

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6092. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

While configuring 4.12.0 dualstack baremetal cluster ovs-configuration.service fails
Jan 19 22:01:05 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: Attempt 10 to bring up connection ovs-if-phys1
Jan 19 22:01:05 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: + nmcli conn up ovs-if-phys1
Jan 19 22:01:05 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[26588]: Error: Connection activation failed: No suitable device found for this connection (device eno1np0 not available because profile i
s not compatible with device (mismatching interface name)).
Jan 19 22:01:05 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: + s=4
Jan 19 22:01:05 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: + sleep 5
Jan 19 22:01:10 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: + '[' 4 -eq 0 ']'
Jan 19 22:01:10 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: + false
Jan 19 22:01:10 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: + echo 'ERROR: Cannot bring up connection ovs-if-phys1 after 10 attempts'
Jan 19 22:01:10 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: ERROR: Cannot bring up connection ovs-if-phys1 after 10 attempts
Jan 19 22:01:10 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: + return 4
Jan 19 22:01:10 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: + handle_exit
Jan 19 22:01:10 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: + e=4
Jan 19 22:01:10 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: + '[' 4 -eq 0 ']'
Jan 19 22:01:10 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: + echo 'ERROR: configure-ovs exited with error: 4'
Jan 19 22:01:10 openshift-worker-0.kni-qe-4.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com configure-ovs.sh[14588]: ERROR: configure-ovs exited with error: 4

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0

How reproducible:

So far 100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy dualstack baremetal cluster with bonded interfaces(configured with MC and not NMState within install-config.yaml)
2. Run migration to second interface, part of machine config
      - contents:
          source: data:text/plain;charset=utf-8,bond0.117
        filesystem: root
        mode: 420
        path: /etc/ovnk/extra_bridge
3. Install operators:
* kubevirt-hyperconverged
* sriov-network-operator
* cluster-logging
* elasticsearch-operator
4. Start applying node-tunning profiles
5. During node reboots ovs-configuration service fails

Actual results:

ovs-configuration service fails on some nodes resulting in ovnkube-node-* pods failure
oc get po -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes
NAME                   READY   STATUS             RESTARTS          AGE
ovnkube-master-dvgx7   6/6     Running            8                 16h
ovnkube-master-vs7mp   6/6     Running            6                 16h
ovnkube-master-zrm4c   6/6     Running            6                 16h
ovnkube-node-2g8mb     4/5     CrashLoopBackOff   175 (3m48s ago)   16h
ovnkube-node-bfbcc     4/5     CrashLoopBackOff   176 (64s ago)     16h
ovnkube-node-cj6vf     5/5     Running            5                 16h
ovnkube-node-f92rm     5/5     Running            5                 16h
ovnkube-node-nmjpn     5/5     Running            5                 16h
ovnkube-node-pfv5z     4/5     CrashLoopBackOff   163 (4m53s ago)   15h
ovnkube-node-z5vf9     5/5     Running            10                15h

Expected results:

ovs-configuration service succeeds on all nodes

Additional info:


Description of problem: upon attempting to install OCP 4.10 UPI on baremetal ppc64le, the openshift-install gather command returns `panic: unsupported platform "none"`

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10.16

openshift-install 4.10.24 

How reproducible:

easily

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create install config
2. create manifests
3. create ignition configs

4. openshift-install gather bootstrap --log-level "debug"

Actual results:

DEBUG OpenShift Installer 4.10.24                  
DEBUG Built from commit d63a12ba0ec33d492093a8fc0e268a01a075f5da 
DEBUG Fetching Bootstrap SSH Key Pair...           
DEBUG Loading Bootstrap SSH Key Pair...            
DEBUG Using Bootstrap SSH Key Pair loaded from state file 
DEBUG Reusing previously-fetched Bootstrap SSH Key Pair 
DEBUG Fetching Install Config...                   
DEBUG Loading Install Config...                    
DEBUG   Loading SSH Key...                         
DEBUG   Loading Base Domain...                     
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Cluster Name...                    
DEBUG     Loading Base Domain...                   
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Networking...                      
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Pull Secret...                     
DEBUG   Loading Platform...                        
DEBUG Loading Install Config from both state file and target directory 
DEBUG On-disk Install Config matches asset in state file 
DEBUG Using Install Config loaded from state file  
DEBUG Reusing previously-fetched Install Config    
panic: unsupported platform "none"

goroutine 1 [running]:
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/terraform/stages/platform.StagesForPlatform({0x146f2d0a, 0x1619aa08})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/terraform/stages/platform/stages.go:55 +0x2ff
main.runGatherBootstrapCmd({0x14d8e028, 0x1})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/gather.go:115 +0x2d6
main.newGatherBootstrapCmd.func1(0xc001364500, {0xc0005a0b40, 0x2, 0x2})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/gather.go:65 +0x59
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc001364500, {0xc0005a0b20, 0x2, 0x2})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:860 +0x5f8
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc001334c80)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:974 +0x3bc
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:902
main.installerMain()
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/main.go:72 +0x29e
main.main()
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/main.go:50 +0x125

Expected results:

I'm not really sure what I expected to happen.  I've never used that gather before..

I would assume at least no panicking.

Additional info:

Tracker issue for bootimage bump in 4.12. This issue should block issues which need a bootimage bump to fix.

The previous bump was OCPBUGS-7529.

Description of problem:
OCP v4.9.31 cluster didn't have the $search domain in /etc/resolv.conf, which was there in the v4.8.29 OCP cluster. This was observed in all the nodes of the v4.9.31 cluster.
~~~
OpenShift 4.9.31
sh-4.4# cat /etc/resolv.conf

  1. Generated by KNI resolv prepender NM dispatcher script
    nameserver 172.xx.xx.xx
    nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
    nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
  2. nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx

OpenShift 4.8.29

  1. Generated by KNI resolv prepender NM dispatcher script
    search sepia.lab.iad2.dc.paas.redhat.com
    nameserver 172.xx.xx.xx
    nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
    nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
  2. nameserver 10.xx.xx.xx
    ~~~

ENV: OpenStack IAD2, IPI installation. Connected cluster.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP v4.9.31

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install IPI cluster on OpenStack IAD2 platform having cluster version 4.9.31
2. Debug to any of the node(master/worker)
3. Check and confirm the missing search domain on all nodes of the cluster.

Actual results:
The search domain was missing when checked in `/etc/resolv.conf` file on all nodes of the cluster causing serious issues in the cluster.

Expected results:
The installer should embed the search domain in /etc/resolv.conf file on all nodes of the cluster.

Additional info:

  • Cu was trying to deploy secure Kerberos on the CoreOS nodes and it failed when the IPA-client install command failed. This is when the customer noticed this unusual behavior. They did not manually update the resolv.conf file to include the $search domain. They instead added the script below to /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ and restarted NetworkManager on the node to fix this issue and installation was successful.
    ~~~
    #!/bin/bash

set -eo pipefail

DISPATCHER_FILE="/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/30-resolv-prepender"
DOMAINS="$(grep -E '\s*DOMAINS=.*iad2.dc.paas.redhat.com' $DISPATCHER_FILE \

grep -oE '[a-z0-9]*.dev.iad2.dc.paas.redhat.com' \
tr '\n' ' ')"

>&2 echo "IT-PaaS: overwriting search domains in /etc/resolv.conf with: $DOMAINS"

sed -e "/^search/d" \
-e "/Generated by/c# Generated by KNI resolv prepender NM dispatcher script \nsearch $DOMAINS" \
/etc/resolv.conf > /etc/resolv.tmp

mv /etc/resolv.tmp /etc/resolv.conf
~~~

  • Cu confirms that the $search domain was missing since the cluster was freshly installed/ They even confirmed this with a fresh new cluster as well that it was missing.
  • The fresh cluster was initially installed at v4.9.31 but was updated afterward to v4.9.43 (the latest z-stream) to see if the updates fixed anything but it didn't make any difference. The cluster is currently running v4.9.43 and shows the $search domain missing in the /etc/resolv.conf file on all nodes.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-723. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
I have a customer who created clusterquota for one of the namespace, it got created but the values were not reflecting under limits or not displaying namespace details.
~~~
$ oc describe AppliedClusterResourceQuota
Name: test-clusterquota
Created: 19 minutes ago
Labels: size=custom
Annotations: <none>
Namespace Selector: []
Label Selector:
AnnotationSelector: map[openshift.io/requester:system:serviceaccount:application-service-accounts:test-sa]
Scopes: NotTerminating
Resource Used Hard
-------- ---- ----
~~~

WORKAROUND: They recreated the clusterquota object (cache it off, delete it, create new) after which it displayed values as expected.

In the past, they saw similar behavior on their test cluster, there it was heavily utilized the etcd DB was much larger in size (>2.5Gi), and had many more objects (at that time, helm secrets were being cached for all deployments, and keeping a history of 10, so etcd was being bombarded).

This cluster the same "symptom" was noticed however etcd was nowhere near that in size nor the amount of etcd objects and/or helm cached secrets.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OCP 4.9

How reproducible: Occurred only twice(once in test and in current cluster)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create ClusterQuota
2. Check AppliedClusterResourceQuota
3. The values and namespace is empty

Actual results: ClusterQuota should display the values

Expected results: ClusterQuota not displaying values

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2092811](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092811). The following is the description of the original bug:

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1926943 +++

The customer is facing this issue:

I0530 05:19:11.481797 1 vsphere_check.go:220] CheckDefaultDatastore failed: defaultDatastore "FI-HML-DC2-CONT-1" in vSphere configuration: datastore FI-HML-DC2-CONT-1: datastore name is too long: escaped volume path "var-lib-kubelet-plugins-kubernetes.io-vsphere\\x2dvolume-mounts\\x5bFI\\x2dHML\\x2dDC2\\x2dCONT\\x2d1\\x5d\\x2000000000\\x2d0000\\x2d0000\\x2d0000\\x2d000000000000-fi\\x2dhmy\\x2dsas\\x2dprod\\x2dnp868\\x2d\\x2dpvc\\x2d00000000\\x2d0000\\x2d0000\\x2d0000
x2d000000000000.vmdk" must be under 255 characters, got 255

Looks like the bug has resurfaced.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4758. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

See: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CPSYN-143

tldr:  Based on the previous direction that 4.12 was going to enforce PSA restricted by default, OLM had to make a few changes because the way we run catalog pods (and we have to run them that way because of how the opm binary worked) was incompatible w/ running restricted.

1) We set openshift-marketplace to enforce restricted (this was our choice, we didn't have to do it, but we did)
2) we updated the opm binary so catalog images using a newer opm binary don't have to run privileged
3) we added a field to catalogsource that allows you to choose whether to run the pod privileged(legacy mode) or restricted.  The default is restricted.  We made that the default so that users running their own catalogs in their own NSes (which would be default PSA enforcing) would be able to be successful w/o needing their NS upgraded to privileged.

Unfortunately this means:
1) legacy catalog images(i.e. using older opm binaries) won't run on 4.12 by default (the catalogsource needs to be modified to specify legacy mode.
2) legacy catalog images cannot be run in the openshift-marketplace NS since that NS does not allow privileged pods.  This means legacy catalogs can't contribute to the global catalog (since catalogs must be in that NS to be in the global catalog).

Before 4.12 ships we need to:
1) remove the PSA restricted label on the openshift-marketplace NS
2) change the catalogsource securitycontextconfig mode default to use "legacy" as the default, not restricted.

This gives catalog authors another release to update to using a newer opm binary that can run restricted, or get their NSes explicitly labeled as privileged (4.12 will not enforce restricted, so in 4.12 using the legacy mode will continue to work)

In 4.13 we will need to revisit what we want the default to be, since at that point catalogs will start breaking if they try to run in legacy mode in most NSes.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


Description of problem:

For example, "openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.gcp.publicDNSZone" tells "PublicDNSZone contains the zone ID and project where the Public DNS zone will be created", but in fact it's for specifying an existing zone where the Public DNS zone records will be put in.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-10-015203

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.gcp.publicDNSZone
2. openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.gcp.privateDNSZone
3.

Actual results:

For example, it tells "PublicDNSZone contains the zone ID and project where the Public DNS zone will be created."

Expected results:

It should be like "PublicDNSZone contains the zone ID and project where the Public DNS zone records will be created."

Additional info:

$ openshift-install version
openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-10-015203
built from commit 02102a96b3f7c78337b32dcafe2e28be6fb67a0f
release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:00806cf7faaa86981e73b478a72c1b7a838cd08b215f3a9ab9b278ae94d9a794
release architecture amd64
$ 
$ openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.gcp.publicDNSZone
KIND:     InstallConfig
VERSION:  v1RESOURCE: <object>
  PublicDNSZone Technology Preview. PublicDNSZone contains the zone ID and project where the Public DNS zone will be created.FIELDS:
    id <string>
      ID Technology Preview. ID or name of the zone.
    project <string>   
      ProjectID Technology Preview When the ProjectID is provided, the zone will be created in this project. When the ProjectID is empty, the DNS zone with this ID will be created and managed in the Service Project (GCP.ProjectID).
$ 
$ openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.gcp.privateDNSZone
KIND:     InstallConfig
VERSION:  v1RESOURCE: <object>
  PrivateDNSZone Technology Preview. PrivateDNSZone contains the zone ID and project where the Private DNS zone will be created.FIELDS:
    id <string>
      ID Technology Preview. ID or name of the zone.
    project <string>
      ProjectID Technology Preview When the ProjectID is provided, the zone will be created in this project. When the ProjectID is empty, the DNS zone with this ID will be created and managed in the Service Project (GCP.ProjectID).
$ 

 

 

 

 

Description of problem:

Upgrade OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 fails with one 'NotReady,SchedulingDisabled' node and MachineConfigDaemonFailed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Upgrade from OCP 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 on top of OSP RHOS-16.2-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1 to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107.

Network Type: OVNKubernetes

How reproducible:

Twice out of two attempts.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 (IPI) on top of OSP RHOS-16.2-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1.
   The cluster is up and running with three workers:
   $ oc get clusterversion
   NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
   version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   True        False         51m     Cluster version is 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532

2. Run the OC command to upgrade to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107:
$ oc adm upgrade --to-image=registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 --allow-explicit-upgrade --force=true
warning: Using by-tag pull specs is dangerous, and while we still allow it in combination with --force for backward compatibility, it would be much safer to pass a by-digest pull spec instead
warning: The requested upgrade image is not one of the available updates.You have used --allow-explicit-upgrade for the update to proceed anyway
warning: --force overrides cluster verification of your supplied release image and waives any update precondition failures.
Requesting update to release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 

3. The upgrade is not succeeds: [0]
$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   True        True          17h     Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107: wait has exceeded 40 minutes for these operators: network

One node degrided to 'NotReady,SchedulingDisabled' status:
$ oc get nodes
NAME                          STATUS                        ROLES    AGE   VERSION
ostest-9vllk-master-0         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-master-1         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-master-2         Ready                         master   19h   v1.24.0+07c9eb7
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt   NotReady,SchedulingDisabled   worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-h6kcs   Ready                         worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f
ostest-9vllk-worker-0-xhz9b   Ready                         worker   18h   v1.24.0+3882f8f

$ oc get pods -A | grep -v -e Completed -e Running
NAMESPACE                                          NAME                                                         READY   STATUS      RESTARTS       AGE
openshift-openstack-infra                          coredns-ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt                          0/2     Init:0/1    0              18h
 
$ oc get events
LAST SEEN   TYPE      REASON                                        OBJECT            MESSAGE
7m15s       Warning   OperatorDegraded: MachineConfigDaemonFailed   /machine-config   Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]
7m15s       Warning   MachineConfigDaemonFailed                     /machine-config   Cluster not available for [{operator 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532}]: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]

$ oc get co
NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
baremetal                                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
console                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      19h     DNS "default" reports Progressing=True: "Have 5 available node-resolver pods, want 6."
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      18h     Progressing: The registry is ready...
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
insights                                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      18h     NodeInstallerProgressing: 1 nodes are at revision 11; 2 nodes are at revision 13
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
machine-config                             4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532   False       True          True       16h     Cluster not available for [{operator 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532}]: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)]
marketplace                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
monitoring                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          True       19h     DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" rollout is not making progress - last change 2022-09-20T14:16:13Z...
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      18h    
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
openshift-samples                          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      17h    
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        False         False      19h    
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107   True        True          False      19h     ManilaCSIDriverOperatorCRProgressing: ManilaDriverNodeServiceControllerProgressing: Waiting for DaemonSet to deploy node pods...

[0] http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1074531

Actual results:

OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 upgrade fails.

Expected results:

OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 upgrade success.

Additional info:

Attached logs of the NotReady node - [^journalctl_ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt.log.tar.gz]

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5734. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

In https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-46450, the VIP was added to noProxy for StackCloud but it should also be added for all national clouds.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.20

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Set up a proxy
2. Deploy a cluster in a national cloud using the proxy
3.

Actual results:

Installation fails

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

The inconsistence was discovered when testing the cluster-network-operator changes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-5559

We cache images by filename, which works when downloading from the Internet as the filename always includes the CoreOS version.

However, when extracting an image from the release payload, it always has the same name. Therefore, we will never update it to a newer image even when running different versions of the installer.

A possible solution:

  1. Check that the cached ISO's checksum matches the RHCOS metadata.
  2. If it doesn't, extract the expected checksum from the release payload and compare that to the cached ISO's checksum.
  3. If it still doesn't match, extract the ISO from the release payload.

An alternative might be to set the name of the cache file to something different. It's not clear how we'd guarantee a match between the release payload we've been given and the ISO unless the name was based on the release payload (which eliminates some of the point of the cache, since ordinarily most release payloads will point to a small number of images).

Description of problem:

When the cluster install finished, wait-for install-complete command didn't exit as expected.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Get the latest agent-installer and build image
git clone https://github.com/openshift/installer.git
cd installer/
hack/build.sh
Edit agent-config and install-config yaml file
Create the agent.iso image:
OPENSHIFT_INSTALL_RELEASE_IMAGE_OVERRIDE=quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.12.0-ec.3-x86_64 bin/openshift-install agent create image --log-level debug

2. Install SNO cluster
virt-install --connect qemu:///system -n control-0 -r 33000 --vcpus 8 --cdrom ./agent.iso --disk pool=installer,size=120 --boot uefi,hd,cdrom --os-variant=rhel8.5 --network network=default,mac=52:54:00:aa:aa:aa --wait=-1 

3. Run 'bin/openshift agent wait-for bootstrap-complete --log-level debug' and the command finished as expected.

4. After 'bootstrap' completion, run 'bin/openshift agent wait-for install-complete --log-level debug', the command didn't finish as expected.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem: This is a follow-up to OCPBUGS-2795 and OCPBUGS-2941.

The installer fails to destroy the cluster when the OpenStack object storage omits 'content-type' from responses. This can happen on responses with HTTP status code 204, where a reverse proxy is truncating content-related headers (see this nginX bug report). In such cases, the Installer errors with:

level=error msg=Bulk deleting of container "5ifivltb-ac890-chr5h-image-registry-fnxlmmhiesrfvpuxlxqnkoxdbl" objects failed: Cannot extract names from response with content-type: []

Listing container object suffers from the same issue as listing the containers and this one isn't fixed in latest versions of gophercloud. I've reported https://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/issues/2509 and fixing it with https://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/issues/2510, however we likely won't be able to backport the bump to gophercloud master back to release-4.8 so we'll have to look for alternatives.

I'm setting the priority to critical as it's causing all our jobs to fail in master.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.8.z

How reproducible:

Likely not happening in customer environments where Swift is exposed directly. We're seeing the issue in our CI where we're using a non-RHOSP managed cloud.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to the detail page of some Deployments with PDB connected to it
2. Click Edit PDB from the kebab menu
3. Inspect the second input box under the `Availability requirement `

Actual results: The name and aria-label attributes always show minAvailable

Expected results: They should be consistent with the first input box

Additional info:

AWS CPMS changes made here causes the single node clusters to fail installation
https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6172

 

Need to fix the issue by checking and not creating the CPMS manifest if the installation type is single node.

Because the agent ISO is ephemeral, it is probably safe to allow a user to log in to it with a password. If the network configuration is broken, a user may have no other way to debug it other than to log in through the console, which is currently not possible.

The best password to set would be the kubeadmin password used for the OpenShift GUI, since we'll have generated that already.

We must take care to test that this does not result in the installed nodes on disk allowing login with a password.

 A related slack thread: here

The error:

 which: no kustomize in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/local/go/bin:/go/bin)
+ curl -L --retry 5 https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/releases/download/kustomize%2Fv4.3.0/kustomize_v4.3.0_linux_amd64.tar.gz
+ tar -zx -C /usr/bin/
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed

  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
100  1523    0  1523    0     0  27196      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 26719
Warning: Problem : HTTP error. Will retry in 300 seconds. 5 retries left.

  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
  0     0    0     0    0     0      0      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
gzip: stdin: not in gzip format
tar: Child died with signal 13
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now 

Source: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_assisted-service/4260/pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-release-ocm-2.6-e2e-ai-operator-ztp-disconnected/1561941429180174336

A related job search: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=gzip%3A+stdin%3A+not+in+gzip+format&maxAge=336h&context=1&type=junit&name=assisted&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

in the ironic-rhcos-downloader container the builder image is still based on rhel8
it should be rhel9 instead

Description of problem:

Each LB created for a Service type LoadBalancer results in 1 client rule and <# of public subnets> health rules being created.  The rules per SG quota in AWS is quite small; 60 by default, and 200 hard max.  OCP has about 40 rules OOTB. Assuming an HA cluster in 3 AZs, that is 4 rules per LB.  With default AWS quota, only ~5 LBs can be create and with the hard max of 200, only ~40 LBs can be created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.  Create Service type LoadBalancer and observe increase in master-sg and worker-sg rules sets
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 rules are created

Expected results:

1 rules is created when the client rule is a superset of the per-subnet health rules

Additional info:

This ~4x the number of Services of type LoadBalancer.  This is required for Hypershift.

Description of problem:

The IBM VPC block CSI driver was rebased to v5.0.0 in this PR:
https://github.com/openshift/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/pull/26

However, we're missing the manifest changes from this PR in 4.12 (delayed by CI issues):
https://github.com/openshift/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator/pull/45

That includes some important changes:
- add csi-snapshotter sidecar and snapshotter manifests
- only deploy volumesnapshotclass if CRD exists
- set consistent imagePullPolicy in deployment manifests
- enable topology tests

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

The Alertmanager silence create / edit form got a new "Negative matcher" option in 4.12 (see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-47734). However, there is nothing to explain what this option means and it will likely not be obvious from the label alone unless you are already quite familiar with Alertmanager.

After discussion with the docs team, it was decided that adding some explanation in context in the UI would be much better than adding an explanation to the documentation. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Go to Admin perspective
2. Go to Observe > Alerting > Silences page
3. Click on the Create button ("Negative matcher" option is shown with no explanation)

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2598. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Liveness probe of ipsec pods fail with large clusters. Currently the command that is executed in the ipsec container is
ovs-appctl -t ovs-monitor-ipsec ipsec/status && ipsec status
The problem is with command "ipsec/status". In clusters with high node count this command will return a list with all the node daemons of the cluster. This means that as the node count raises the completion time of the command raises too. 

This makes the main command 

ovs-appctl -t ovs-monitor-ipsec

To hang until the subcommand is finished.

As the liveness and readiness probe values are hardcoded in the manifest of the ipsec container herehttps//github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/9c1181e34316d34db49d573698d2779b008bcc20/bindata/network/ovn-kubernetes/common/ipsec.yaml] the liveness timeout of the container probe of 60 seconds start to be  insufficient as the node count list is growing. This resulted in a cluster with 170 + nodes to have 15+ ipsec pods in a crashloopbackoff state.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift Container Platform 4.10 but i think the same will be visible to other versions too.

How reproducible:

I was not able to reproduce due to an extreamely high amount of resources are needed and i think that there is no point as we have spotted the issue.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install an Openshift cluster with IPSEC enabled
2. Scale to 170+ nodes or more
3. Notice that the ipsec pods will start getting in a Crashloopbackoff state with failed Liveness/Readiness probes.

Actual results:

Ip Sec pods are stuck in a Crashloopbackoff state

Expected results:

Ip Sec pods to work normally

Additional info:

We have provided a workaround where CVO and CNO operators are scaled to 0 replicas in order for us to be able to increase the liveness probe limit to a value of 600 that recovered the cluster. 
As a next step the customer will try to reduce the node count and restore the default liveness timeout value along with bringing the operators back to see if the cluster will stabilize.

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3508. The following is the description of the original issue:

Exposed via the fact that the periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-ipv4 job is at 0% for at least the past two weeks over approximatesly 65 runs.

Testgrid shows that this job started failing in a very consistent way on Oct 25th at about 8am UTC: https://testgrid.k8s.io/redhat-openshift-ocp-release-4.12-informing#periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-ipv4

6 disruption tests fail, all with alarming consistency virtually always claiming exactly 8s of disruption, max allowed 1s.

And then openshift-tests.[sig-arch] events should not repeat pathologically fails with an odd signature:

{  6 events happened too frequently

event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-2 - reason/NodeHasNoDiskPressure roles/control-plane,master Node master-2 status is now: NodeHasNoDiskPressure
event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-2 - reason/NodeHasSufficientMemory roles/control-plane,master Node master-2 status is now: NodeHasSufficientMemory
event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-2 - reason/NodeHasSufficientPID roles/control-plane,master Node master-2 status is now: NodeHasSufficientPID
event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-1 - reason/NodeHasNoDiskPressure roles/control-plane,master Node master-1 status is now: NodeHasNoDiskPressure
event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-1 - reason/NodeHasSufficientMemory roles/control-plane,master Node master-1 status is now: NodeHasSufficientMemory
event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-1 - reason/NodeHasSufficientPID roles/control-plane,master Node master-1 status is now: NodeHasSufficientPID}

The two types of tests started failing together exactly, and the disruption measurements are bizzarely consistent, every single time we see precisely 8s for kube-api, cache-kube-api, openshift-api, cache-openshift-api, oauth-api, cache-oauth-api. It's always these 6, and it seems to be always exactly 8 seconds. I cannot state enough how strange this is. It almost implies that something is happening on a very consistent schedule.

Occasionally these are accompanied by 1-2s of disruption for those backends with new connections, but sometimes not as well.

It looks like all of the disruption consistently happens within two very long tests:

4s within: [sig-network] services when running openshift ipv4 cluster ensures external ip policy is configured correctly on the cluster [Serial] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

4s within: [sig-network] services when running openshift ipv4 cluster on bare metal [apigroup:config.openshift.io] ensures external auto assign cidr is configured correctly on the cluster [Serial] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

Both tests appear to have run prior to oct 25, so I don't think it's a matter of new tests breaking something or getting unskipped. Both tests also always pass, but appear to be impacting the cluster?

The master's going NotReady also appears to fall within the above two tests as well, though it does not seem to directly match with when we measure disruption, but bear in mind there's a 40s delay before the node goes NotReady.

Focusing on https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-ipv4/1590640492373086208 where the above are from:

Two of the three master nodes appear to be going NodeNotReady a couple times throughout the run, as visible in the spyglass chart under the node state row on the left. master-0 does not appear here, but it does exist. (I suspect it has leader and thus is the node reporting the others going not ready)

From the master-0 kubelet log in must-gather we can see one of these examples where it reports that master-2 has not checked in:

2022-11-10T10:38:35.874090961Z I1110 10:38:35.873975       1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:1137] node master-2 hasn't been updated for 40.00700561s. Last Ready is: &NodeCondition{Type:Ready,Status:True,LastHeartbeatTime:2022-11-10 1
0:36:10 +0000 UTC,LastTransitionTime:2022-11-10 10:29:11 +0000 UTC,Reason:KubeletReady,Message:kubelet is posting ready status,}
2022-11-10T10:38:35.874090961Z I1110 10:38:35.874056       1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:1137] node master-2 hasn't been updated for 40.007097549s. Last MemoryPressure is: &NodeCondition{Type:MemoryPressure,Status:False,LastHeartb
eatTime:2022-11-10 10:36:10 +0000 UTC,LastTransitionTime:2022-11-10 10:29:11 +0000 UTC,Reason:KubeletHasSufficientMemory,Message:kubelet has sufficient memory available,}
2022-11-10T10:38:35.874090961Z I1110 10:38:35.874067       1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:1137] node master-2 hasn't been updated for 40.007110285s. Last DiskPressure is: &NodeCondition{Type:DiskPressure,Status:False,LastHeartbeatT
ime:2022-11-10 10:36:10 +0000 UTC,LastTransitionTime:2022-11-10 10:29:11 +0000 UTC,Reason:KubeletHasNoDiskPressure,Message:kubelet has no disk pressure,}
2022-11-10T10:38:35.874090961Z I1110 10:38:35.874076       1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:1137] node master-2 hasn't been updated for 40.007119541s. Last PIDPressure is: &NodeCondition{Type:PIDPressure,Status:False,LastHeartbeatTim
e:2022-11-10 10:36:10 +0000 UTC,LastTransitionTime:2022-11-10 10:29:11 +0000 UTC,Reason:KubeletHasSufficientPID,Message:kubelet has sufficient PID available,}
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881749410Z I1110 10:38:35.881705       1 controller_utils.go:181] "Recording status change event message for node" status="NodeNotReady" node="master-2"
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881749410Z I1110 10:38:35.881733       1 controller_utils.go:120] "Update ready status of pods on node" node="master-2"
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881820988Z I1110 10:38:35.881799       1 controller_utils.go:138] "Updating ready status of pod to false" pod="metal3-b7b69fdbb-rfbdj"
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881893234Z I1110 10:38:35.881858       1 topologycache.go:179] Ignoring node master-2 because it has an excluded label
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881893234Z W1110 10:38:35.881886       1 topologycache.go:199] Can't get CPU or zone information for worker-0 node
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881903023Z I1110 10:38:35.881892       1 topologycache.go:215] Insufficient node info for topology hints (0 zones, %!s(int64=0) CPU, false)
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881932172Z I1110 10:38:35.881917       1 controller.go:271] Node changes detected, triggering a full node sync on all loadbalancer services
2022-11-10T10:38:35.882290428Z I1110 10:38:35.882270       1 event.go:294] "Event occurred" object="master-2" fieldPath="" kind="Node" apiVersion="v1" type="Normal" reason="NodeNotReady" message="Node master-2 status is now: NodeNotReady"

Now from master-2's kubelet log around that time, 40 seconds earlier puts us at 10:37:55, so we'd be looking for something odd around there.

A few potential lines:

Nov 10 10:37:55.232537 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:37:55.232495    1930 patch_prober.go:29] interesting pod/kube-controller-manager-guard-master-2 container/guard namespace/openshift-kube-controller-manager: Readiness probe status=failure output="Get \"https://192.168.111.22:10257/healthz\": dial tcp 192.168.111.22:10257: connect: connection refused" start-of-body=

Nov 10 10:37:55.232537 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:37:55.232549    1930 prober.go:114] "Probe failed" probeType="Readiness" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-guard-master-2" podUID=8be2c6c1-f8f6-4bf0-b26d-53ce487354bd containerName="guard" probeResult=failure output="Get \"https://192.168.111.22:10257/healthz\": dial tcp 192.168.111.22:10257: connect: connection refused"

Nov 10 10:38:12.238273 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: E1110 10:38:12.238229    1930 controller.go:187] failed to update lease, error: Put "https://api-int.ostest.test.metalkube.org:6443/apis/coordination.k8s.io/v1/namespaces/kube-node-lease/leases/master-2?timeout=10s": net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)

Nov 10 10:38:13.034109 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: E1110 10:38:13.034077    1930 kubelet_node_status.go:487] "Error updating node status, will retry" err="error getting node \"master-2\": Get \"https://api-int.ostest.test.metalkube.org:6443/api/v1/nodes/master-2?resourceVersion=0&timeout=10s\": net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)"

At 10:38:40 all kinds of master-2 watches time out with messages like:

Nov 10 10:38:40.244399 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: W1110 10:38:40.244272    1930 reflector.go:347] object-"openshift-oauth-apiserver"/"kube-root-ca.crt": watch of *v1.ConfigMap ended with: an error on the server ("unable to decode an event from the watch stream: http2: client connection lost") has prevented the request from succeeding

And then suddenly we're back online:

Nov 10 10:38:40.252149 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:40.252131    1930 kubelet_node_status.go:590] "Recording event message for node" node="master-2" event="NodeHasSufficientMemory"
Nov 10 10:38:40.252149 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:40.252156    1930 kubelet_node_status.go:590] "Recording event message for node" node="master-2" event="NodeHasNoDiskPressure"
Nov 10 10:38:40.252268 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:40.252165    1930 kubelet_node_status.go:590] "Recording event message for node" node="master-2" event="NodeHasSufficientPID"
Nov 10 10:38:40.252268 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:40.252177    1930 kubelet_node_status.go:590] "Recording event message for node" node="master-2" event="NodeReady"
Nov 10 10:38:47.904430 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:47.904373    1930 kubelet.go:2229] "SyncLoop (probe)" probe="readiness" status="" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-master-2"
Nov 10 10:38:47.904842 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:47.904662    1930 kubelet.go:2229] "SyncLoop (probe)" probe="startup" status="unhealthy" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-master-2"
Nov 10 10:38:47.907900 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:47.907872    1930 kubelet.go:2229] "SyncLoop (probe)" probe="startup" status="started" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-master-2"
Nov 10 10:38:48.431448 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:48.431414    1930 kubelet.go:2229] "SyncLoop (probe)" probe="readiness" status="ready" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-master-2"
Nov 10 10:38:54.764069 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764029    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-kube-scheduler/openshift-kube-scheduler-master-2" status=Running
Nov 10 10:38:54.764069 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764059    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-kni-infra/keepalived-master-2" status=Running
Nov 10 10:38:54.764069 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764077    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-kni-infra/coredns-master-2" status=Running
Nov 10 10:38:54.764069 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764086    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-kni-infra/haproxy-master-2" status=Running
Nov 10 10:38:54.764492 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764106    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-etcd/etcd-master-2" status=Running
Nov 10 10:38:54.764492 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764113    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-master-2" status=Running

Also curious:

Nov 10 10:37:50.318237 master-2 ovs-vswitchd[1324]: ovs|00251|connmgr|INFO|br0<->unix#468: 2 flow_mods in the last 0 s (2 deletes)
Nov 10 10:37:50.342965 master-2 ovs-vswitchd[1324]: ovs|00252|connmgr|INFO|br0<->unix#471: 4 flow_mods in the last 0 s (4 deletes)
Nov 10 10:37:50.364271 master-2 ovs-vswitchd[1324]: ovs|00253|bridge|INFO|bridge br0: deleted interface vethcb8d36e6 on port 41

Nov 10 10:37:53.579562 master-2 NetworkManager[1336]: <info>  [1668076673.5795] dhcp4 (enp2s0): state changed new lease, address=192.168.111.22

These look like they could be related to the tests these problems appear to coincide with?

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4089. The following is the description of the original issue:

The kube-state-metric pod inside the openshift-monitoring namespace is not running as expected.

On checking the logs I am able to see that there is a memory panic

~~~
2022-11-22T09:57:17.901790234Z I1122 09:57:17.901768 1 main.go:199] Starting kube-state-metrics self metrics server: 127.0.0.1:8082
2022-11-22T09:57:17.901975837Z I1122 09:57:17.901951 1 main.go:66] levelinfomsgTLS is disabled.http2false
2022-11-22T09:57:17.902389844Z I1122 09:57:17.902291 1 main.go:210] Starting metrics server: 127.0.0.1:8081
2022-11-22T09:57:17.903191857Z I1122 09:57:17.903133 1 main.go:66] levelinfomsgTLS is disabled.http2false
2022-11-22T09:57:17.906272505Z I1122 09:57:17.906224 1 builder.go:191] Active resources: certificatesigningrequests,configmaps,cronjobs,daemonsets,deployments,endpoints,horizontalpodautoscalers,ingresses,jobs,leases,limitranges,mutatingwebhookconfigurations,namespaces,networkpolicies,nodes,persistentvolumeclaims,persistentvolumes,poddisruptionbudgets,pods,replicasets,replicationcontrollers,resourcequotas,secrets,services,statefulsets,storageclasses,validatingwebhookconfigurations,volumeattachments
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z E1122 09:57:17.917560 1 runtime.go:78] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z goroutine 24 [running]:
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic(

{0x1635600, 0x2696e10})
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:74 +0x7d
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash({0x0, 0x0, 0xfffffffe})
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:48 +0x75
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z panic({0x1635600, 0x2696e10}

)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:1038 +0x215
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/internal/store.ingressMetricFamilies.func6(0x40)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/internal/store/ingress.go:136 +0x189
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/internal/store.wrapIngressFunc.func1(

{0x17fe520, 0xc00063b590})
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/internal/store/ingress.go:175 +0x49
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/pkg/metric_generator.(*FamilyGenerator).Generate(...)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/pkg/metric_generator/generator.go:67
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/pkg/metric_generator.ComposeMetricGenFuncs.func1({0x17fe520, 0xc00063b590}

)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/pkg/metric_generator/generator.go:107 +0xd8
~~~

Logs are attached to the support case

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5151. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Cx is not able to install new cluster OCP BM IPI. During the bootstrapping the provisioning interfaces from master node not getting ipv4 dhcp ip address from bootstrap dhcp server on OCP IPI BareMetal install 

Please refer to following BUG --> https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-872  The problem was solved by applying rd.net.timeout.carrier=30 to the kernel parameters of compute nodes via cluster-baremetal operator. The fix also need to be apply to the control-plane. 

  ref:// https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/286/files

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Perform OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

Customer should be able to install the cluster without any issue.

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7015. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

fail to create vSphere 4.12.2 IPI cluster as apiVIP and ingressVIP are not in machine networks

# ./openshift-install create cluster --dir=/tmp
? SSH Public Key /root/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
? Platform vsphere
? vCenter vcenter.vmware.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com
? Username administrator@gsslab.pnq
? Password [? for help] ************
INFO Connecting to vCenter vcenter.vmware.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com
INFO Defaulting to only available datacenter: OpenShift-DC
INFO Defaulting to only available cluster: OCP
? Default Datastore OCP-PNQ-Datastore
? Network PNQ2-25G-PUBLIC-PG
? Virtual IP Address for API [? for help] 192.168.1.10
X Sorry, your reply was invalid: IP expected to be in one of the machine networks: 10.0.0.0/16
? Virtual IP Address for API [? for help]


As the user could not define cidr for machineNetwork when creating the cluster or install-config file interactively, it will use default value 10.0.0.0/16, so fail to create the cluster ot install-config when inputting apiVIP and ingressVIP outside of default machinenNetwork.

Error is thrown from https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/types/validation/installconfig.go#L655-L666, seems new function introduced from PR https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/5798

The issue should also impact Nutanix platform.

I don't understand why the installer is expecting/validating VIPs from 10.0.0.0/16 machine network by default when it's not evening asking to input the machine networks during the survey. This validation was not mandatory in previous OCP installers.


 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

# ./openshift-install version
./openshift-install 4.12.2
built from commit 7fea1c4fc00312fdf91df361b4ec1a1a12288a97
release image quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:31c7741fc7bb73ff752ba43f5acf014b8fadd69196fc522241302de918066cb1
release architecture amd64

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create install-config.yaml file by running command "./openshift-install create install-config --dir ipi"
2. failed with above error

Actual results:

fail to create install-config.yaml file

Expected results:

succeed to create install-config.yaml file

Additional info:

 The current workaround is to use dummy VIPs from 10.0.0.0/16 machinenetwork to create the install-config first and then modify the machinenetwork and VIPs as per your requirement which is overhead and creates a negative experience.


There was already a bug reported which seems to have only fixed the VIP validation: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-881
 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12878. The following is the description of the original issue:

We want to add the dual-stack tests to the CNI plugin conformance test suite, for the currently supported releases.

(This has no impact on OpenShift itself. We're just modifying a test suite that OCP does not use.)

Description of problem:

InstanceMetadataTags are not supported in AWS C2S region(us-iso-x)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. OCP4.11 IPI Installation on AWS C2S regions
2. 
3. 

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

Actual Error: 

"Error launching resource Instance. Unsupported Operation Specifying InstanceMetadataTags is not yet supported"

There is a related fix on upstream:

resource/aws_instance: Handle regions where instance metadata tags are unsupported
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/pull/26631

Description

As a user, I would like to see the type of technology used by the samples on the samples view similar to the all services view. 

On the samples view:

It is showing different types of samples, e.g. devfile, helm and all showing as .NET. It is difficult for user to decide which .Net entry to select on the list. We'll need something like the all service view where it shows the type of technology on the top right of each card for users to differentiate between the entries:

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add visible label as the all services view on each card to show the technology used by the sample on the samples view.

Additional Details:

Description of problem:
When opening the Devfile sample developer catalog, switch the project in another browser tab, and then open devfile samples link in a new tab, the current project context is getting lost.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12, expecting that this happen also in older versions

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Switch to the developer perspective, navigate to Add > Samples
2. Open a new browser tab and create a new project
3. Ctrl+click a sample in the first tab.

Actual results:
The project has also changed in the "Import sample" page

Expected results:
The project should be used also for the new "Import sample" page

Additional info:
We had this issue earlier for other catalog entries. Other samples works already fine, just the Devfile sample links doesn't contain the current namespace.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3314. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

triggers[].gitlab.secretReference[1] disappears when a 'buildconfig' is edited on ‘From View’

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.32

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Configure triggers[].gitlab.secretReference[1] as below 

~~~
spec:
 .. 
  triggers:
    - type: ConfigChange
    - type: GitLab
      gitlab:
        secretReference:
          name: m24s40-githook
~~~
2. Open ‘Edit BuildConfig’ buildconfig  with ‘From’ View:
 - Buildconfigs -> Actions -> Edit Buildconfig

3. Click ‘YAML view’ on top. 

Actual results:

The 'secretReference' configured earlier has disappeared. You can click [Reload] button which will bring the configuration back.

Expected results:

'secretReference' configured in buildconfigs do not disappear. 

Additional info:


[1]https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/rest_api/workloads_apis/buildconfig-build-openshift-io-v1.html#spec-triggers-gitlab-secretreference

 

Description of problem:

When running node-density (245 pods/node) on a 120 node cluster, we see that there is a huge spike (~22s) in Avg pod-latency. When the spike occurs we see all the ovnkube-master pods go through a restart. 

The restart happens because of (ovnkube-master pods)

2022-08-10T04:04:44.494945179Z panic: reflect: call of reflect.Value.Len on ptr Value

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-09-114621

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run node-density on a 120 node cluster

Actual results:

Spike observed in pod-latency graph ~22s

Expected results:

Steady pod-latency graph ~4s

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2841. The following is the description of the original issue:

Currently the agent installer supports only x86_64 arch. The image creation command must fail if some other arch is configured different from x86_64

We want to have an allowed list of architectures.

allowed = ['x86_64', 'amd64']

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3123. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Support for tech preview API extensions was introduced in https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6336 and https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1274 .  In the case of https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1278 , config/v1/0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml was introduced which seems to result in both 0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml and 0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-Default.crd.yaml being rendered by the bootstrap.  As a result, both CRDs are created during bootstrap.  However, one of them(in this case the tech preview CRD) fails to be created.  

We may need to modify the render command to be aware of feature gates when rendering manifests during bootstrap.  Also, I'm open hearing other views on how this might work. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

https://github.com/openshift/cluster-config-operator/pull/269 built and running on 4.12-ec5 

How reproducible:

consistently

Steps to Reproduce:

1. bump the version of OpenShift API to one including a tech preview version of the infrastructure CRD
2. install openshift with the infrastructure manifest modified to incorporate tech preview fields
3. those fields will not be populated upon installation

Also, checking the logs from bootkube will show both being installed, but one of them fails.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

Excerpts from bootkube log
Nov 02 20:40:01 localhost.localdomain bootkube.sh[4216]: Writing asset: /assets/config-bootstrap/manifests/0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
Nov 02 20:40:01 localhost.localdomain bootkube.sh[4216]: Writing asset: /assets/config-bootstrap/manifests/0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-Default.crd.yaml


Nov 02 20:41:23 localhost.localdomain bootkube.sh[5710]: Created "0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-Default.crd.yaml" customresourcedefinitions.v1.apiextensions.k8s.io/infrastructures.config.openshift.io -n
Nov 02 20:41:23 localhost.localdomain bootkube.sh[5710]: Skipped "0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructure-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml" customresourcedefinitions.v1.apiextensions.k8s.io/infrastructures.config.openshift.io -n  as it already exists

 

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3114. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When running a Hosted Cluster on Hypershift the cluster-networking-operator never progressed to Available despite all the components being up and running

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.11.11-x86_64 for the hosted clusters
hypershift operator is quay.io/hypershift/hypershift-operator:4.11
4.11.9 management cluster

How reproducible:

Happened once

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

oc get co network reports False availability

Expected results:

oc get co network reports True availability

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

NPE on topology for the ns which just got deleted, see screenshot below

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Login as regular user
2. Create a ns and delete the ns
3. visit the deleted ns in topology

Actual results:

console breaks dur to NPE

Expected results:

console shouldn't break

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4401. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

cluster-policy-controller has  unnecessary permissions and is able to operate on all leases in KCM namespace. This also applies to namespace-security-allocation-controller that was moved some time ago and does not need lock mechanism.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

 
 
 

 

Description of problem:
The "Add Git Repository" has a "Show configuration options" expandable section that shows the required permissions for a webhook setup, and provides a link to "read more about setting up webhook".

But the permission section shows nothing when open this second expandable section, and the link doesn't do anything until the user enters a "supported" GitHub, GitLab or BitBucket URL.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11-4.13

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install Pipelines operator
  2. Navigate to the Developer perspective > Pipelines
  3. Press "Create" and select "Repository"
  4. Click on "Show configuration options"
  5. Click on "See Git permissions"
  6. Click on "Read more about setting up webhook"

Actual results:

  1. The Git permission section shows no git permissions.
  2. The Read more link doesn't open any new page.

Expected results:

  1. The Git permission section should show some info or must not be disabled.
  2. The Read more link should open a page or must not be displayed as well.

Additional info:

  1. None

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11458. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6947. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a long standing issue where gcp ovn for some reason sees dramatically more disruption to ingress during upgrades than other clouds. It can best be seen in the "ingress" graphs in charts such as: https://lookerstudio.google.com/s/v6xhLCTHHDY

Notice image-registry-new (which is ingress backed), ingress-to-console new, and ingress-to-oauth new, all of which take an average of 40s as of the time of this writing. For comparison, Azure is normally <10, and AWS <4.

You will also note the load-balancer new backend shows similar high disruption, but after conversations with network edge we now know the code paths for these two are very different, thus we're filing this as a separate bug. The SLB bug is https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-6796. The two may prove to be same cause in future, as they do appear similar, but not identical even in terms of when the problems occur.

Some example prob jows are easy to find as the disruption is on average there. Note that we do not typically fail a test on these as the disruption monitoring stack is built to try to pin where we're at now, and this is a long standing issue.

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade/1620744632478470144

This job was near successful but got 45s of disruption to image-registry-new. The disruption observed can always be seen in artifacts such as: https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade/1620744632478470144/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/junit/backend-disruption_20230201-120923.json

Expanding the first "Intervals - spyglass" chart on the main prowjob page, you can see when the disruption occurred and what else was going on in the cluster at that time.

This shows we're not getting a continuous 40+s of disruption, rather a few batches.

The ingress services all go down roughly together, the service load balancer pattern looks a little different, thus the different bug mentioned above.

For more examples just visit https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/jobs/4.13/runs?filters=%7B%22items%22%3A%5B%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22name%22%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22equals%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade%22%7D%5D%7D&sortField=timestamp&sort=desc, it will happen nearly every time.

When examining what else was going on when this happens, we see some clear patterns of nodes being updated.

Description of problem:

unset field networks in topology of each failureDomain, but defines platform.vsphere.vcenters.

in install-config.yaml:

    vcenters:
    - server: xxx
      user: xxx
      password: xxx
      datacenters:
      - IBMCloud
      - datacenter-2
    failureDomains:
    - name: us-east-1
      region: us-east
      zone: us-east-1a
      topology:
        datacenter: IBMCloud
        computeCluster: /IBMCloud/host/vcs-mdcnc-workload-2
        datastore: multi-zone-ds-shared
      server: ibmvcenter.vmc-ci.devcluster.openshift.com
    - name: us-east-2
      region: us-east
      zone: us-east-2a
      topology:
        datacenter: IBMCloud
        computeCluster: /IBMCloud/host/vcs-mdcnc-workload-2
        datastore: multi-zone-ds-shared
      server: ibmvcenter.vmc-ci.devcluster.openshift.com
    - name: us-east-3

Launch installer to create cluster, get panic error

sh-4.4$ ./openshift-install create cluster --dir ipi --log-level debug
DEBUG OpenShift Installer 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-25-071630 
DEBUG Built from commit 1fb1397635c89ff8b3645fed4c4c264e4119fa84 
DEBUG Fetching Metadata...                         
...
DEBUG       Reusing previously-fetched Master Ignition Config 
DEBUG     Generating Master Machines...            
panic: runtime error: index out of range [0] with length 0goroutine 1 [running]:
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/asset/machines/vsphere.getDefinedZones(0xc0003bec80)
    /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/asset/machines/vsphere/machinesets.go:122 +0x4f8
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/asset/machines/vsphere.Machines({0xc0011ca0b0, 0xd}, 0xc001080c80, 0xc0005cad50, {0xc000651d10, 0x13}, {0x4ab5773, 0x6}, {0x4ad49bb, 0x10})
    /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/asset/machines/vsphere/machines.go:37 +0x250
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/asset/machines.(*Master).Generate(0xc001118bd0, 0x5?)
 

Field platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology.netowrks is not required in documentation.

sh-4.4$ ./openshift-install explain installconfig.platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology
KIND:     InstallConfig
VERSION:  v1RESOURCE: <object>
  Topology describes a given failure domain using vSphere constructsFIELDS:
    computeCluster <string> -required-
      computeCluster as the failure domain This is required to be a path    datacenter <string> -required-
      datacenter is the vCenter datacenter in which virtual machines will be located and defined as the failure domain.    datastore <string> -required-
      datastore is the name or inventory path of the datastore in which the virtual machine is created/located.    folder <string>
      folder is the name or inventory path of the folder in which the virtual machine is created/located.    networks <[]string>
      networks is the list of networks within this failure domain    resourcePool <string>
      resourcePool is the absolute path of the resource pool where virtual machines will be created. The absolute path is of the form /<datacenter>/host/<cluster>/Resources/<resourcepool>. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-25-071630

How reproducible:

always when setting platform.vsphere.vcenters and unsetting platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology.networks
It works if no set platform.vsphere.vcenters and set platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology.networks

Steps to Reproduce:

1. configure zones in install-config.yaml, set platform.vsphere.vcenters and unset platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology.networks
2. install IPI cluster
3.

Actual results:

installer get panic error

Expected results:

installation is successful.