Back to index

4.12.45

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.58

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The End of General support for vSphere 6.7 will be on October 15, 2022. So, vSphere 6.7 will be deprecated for 4.11.

We want to encourage vSphere customers to upgrade to vSphere 7 in OCP 4.11 since VMware is EOLing (general support) for vSphere 6.7 in Oct 2022.

We want the cluster Upgradeable=false + have a strong alert pointing to our docs / requirements.

related slack: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CH06KMDRV/p1647541493096729

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

There is a new driver release 5.0.0 since the last rebase that includes snapshot support:

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/releases/tag/v5.0.0

Rebase the driver on v5.0.0 and update the deployments in ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator.
There are no corresponding changes in ibm-vpc-node-label-updater since the last rebase.

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

This includes ibm-vpc-node-label-updater!

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Epic Goal

  • Enable the migration from a storage intree driver to a CSI based driver with minimal impact to the end user, applications and cluster
  • These migrations would include, but are not limited to:
    • CSI driver for AWS EBS
    • CSI driver for GCP
    • CSI driver for Azure (file and disk)
    • CSI driver for VMware vSphere

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

This Epic tracks the GA of this feature

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.

Feature Overview  

Much like core OpenShift operators, a standardized flow exists for OLM-managed operators to interact with the cluster in a specific way to leverage AWS STS authorization when using AWS APIs as opposed to insecure static, long-lived credentials. OLM-managed operators can implement integration with the CloudCredentialOperator in well-defined way to support this flow.

Goals:

Enable customers to easily leverage OpenShift's capabilities around AWS STS with layered products, for increased security posture. Enable OLM-managed operators to implement support for this in well-defined pattern.

Requirements:

  • CCO gets a new mode in which it can reconcile STS credential request for OLM-managed operators
  • A standardized flow is leveraged to guide users in discovering and preparing their AWS IAM policies and roles with permissions that are required for OLM-managed operators 
  • A standardized flow is defined in which users can configure OLM-managed operators to leverage AWS STS
  • An example operator is used to demonstrate the end2end functionality
  • Clear instructions and documentation for operator development teams to implement the required interaction with the CloudCredentialOperator to support this flow

Use Cases:

See Operators & STS slide deck.

 

Out of Scope:

  • handling OLM-managed operator updates in which AWS IAM permission requirements might change from one version to another (which requires user awareness and intervention)

 

Background:

The CloudCredentialsOperator already provides a powerful API for OpenShift's cluster core operator to request credentials and acquire them via short-lived tokens. This capability should be expanded to OLM-managed operators, specifically to Red Hat layered products that interact with AWS APIs. The process today is cumbersome to none-existent based on the operator in question and seen as an adoption blocker of OpenShift on AWS.

 

Customer Considerations

This is particularly important for ROSA customers. Customers are expected to be asked to pre-create the required IAM roles outside of OpenShift, which is deemed acceptable.

Documentation Considerations

  • Internal documentation needs to exists to guide Red Hat operator developer teams on the requirements and proposed implementation of integration with CCO and the proposed flow
  • External documentation needs to exist to guide users on:
    • how to become aware that the cluster is in STS mode
    • how to become aware of operators that support STS and the proposed CCO flow
    • how to become aware of the IAM permissions requirements of these operators
    • how to configure an operator in the proposed flow to interact with CCO

Interoperability Considerations

  • this needs to work with ROSA
  • this needs to work with self-managed OCP on AWS

Market Problem

This Section: High-Level description of the Market Problem ie: Executive Summary

  • As a customer of OpenShift layered products, I need to be able to fluidly, reliably and consistently install and use OpenShift layered product Kubernetes Operators into my ROSA STS clusters, while keeping a STS workflow throughout.
  •  
  • As a customer of OpenShift on the big cloud providers, overall I expect OpenShift as a platform to function equally well with tokenized cloud auth as it does with "mint-mode" IAM credentials. I expect the same from the Kubernetes Operators under the Red Hat brand (that need to reach cloud APIs) in that tokenized workflows are equally integrated and workable as with "mint-mode" IAM credentials.
  •  
  • As the managed services, including Hypershift teams, offering a downstream opinionated, supported and managed lifecycle of OpenShift (in the forms of ROSA, ARO, OSD on GCP, Hypershift, etc), the OpenShift platform should have as close as possible, native integration with core platform operators when clusters use tokenized cloud auth, driving the use of layered products.
  • .
  • As the Hypershift team, where the only credential mode for clusters/customers is STS (on AWS) , the Red Hat branded Operators that must reach the AWS API, should be enabled to work with STS credentials in a consistent, and automated fashion that allows customer to use those operators as easily as possible, driving the use of layered products.

Why it Matters

  • Adding consistent, automated layered product integrations to OpenShift would provide great added value to OpenShift as a platform, and its downstream offerings in Managed Cloud Services and related offerings.
  • Enabling Kuberenetes Operators (at first, Red Hat ones) on OpenShift for the "big3" cloud providers is a key differentiation and security requirement that our customers have been and continue to demand.
  • HyperShift is an STS-only architecture, which means that if our layered offerings via Operators cannot easily work with STS, then it would be blocking us from our broad product adoption goals.

Illustrative User Stories or Scenarios

  1. Main success scenario - high-level user story
    1. customer creates a ROSA STS or Hypershift cluster (AWS)
    2. customer wants basic (table-stakes) features such as AWS EFS or RHODS or Logging
    3. customer sees necessary tasks for preparing for the operator in OperatorHub from their cluster
    4. customer prepares AWS IAM/STS roles/policies in anticipation of the Operator they want, using what they get from OperatorHub
    5. customer's provides a very minimal set of parameters (AWS ARN of role(s) with policy) to the Operator's OperatorHub page
    6. The cluster can automatically setup the Operator, using the provided tokenized credentials and the Operator functions as expected
    7. Cluster and Operator upgrades are taken into account and automated
    8. The above steps 1-7 should apply similarly for Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure Cloud, with their respective token-based workload identity systems.
  2. Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
    1. The same as above, but the ROSA CLI would assist with AWS role/policy management
    2. The same as above, but the oc CLI would assist with cloud role/policy management (per respective cloud provider for the cluster)
  3. ...

Expected Outcomes

This Section: Articulates and defines the value proposition from a users point of view

  • See SDE-1868 as an example of what is needed, including design proposed, for current-day ROSA STS and by extension Hypershift.
  • Further research is required to accomodate the AWS STS equivalent systems of GCP and Azure
  • Order of priority at this time is
    • 1. AWS STS for ROSA and ROSA via HyperShift
    • 2. Microsoft Azure for ARO
    • 3. Google Cloud for OpenShift Dedicated on GCP

Effect

This Section: Effect is the expected outcome within the market. There are two dimensions of outcomes; growth or retention. This represents part of the “why” statement for a feature.

  • Growth is the acquisition of net new usage of the platform. This can be new workloads not previously able to be supported, new markets not previously considered, or new end users not previously served.
  • Retention is maintaining and expanding existing use of the platform. This can be more effective use of tools, competitive pressures, and ease of use improvements.
  • Both of growth and retention are the effect of this effort.
    • Customers have strict requirements around using only token-based cloud credential systems for workloads in their cloud accounts, which include OpenShift clusters in all forms.
      • We gain new customers from both those that have waited for token-based auth/auth from OpenShift and from those that are new to OpenShift, with strict requirements around cloud account access
      • We retain customers that are going thru both cloud-native and hybrid-cloud journeys that all inevitably see security requirements driving them towards token-based auth/auth.
      •  

References

As an engineer I want the capability to implement CI test cases that run at different intervals, be it daily, weekly so as to ensure downstream operators that are dependent on certain capabilities are not negatively impacted if changes in systems CCO interacts with change behavior.

Acceptance Criteria:

Create a stubbed out e2e test path in CCO and matching e2e calling code in release such that there exists a path to tests that verify working in an AWS STS workflow.

OC mirror is GA product as of Openshift 4.11 .

The goal of this feature is to solve any future customer request for new features or capabilities in OC mirror 

Epic Goal

  • Mirror to mirror operations and custom mirroring flows required by IBM CloudPak catalog management

Why is this important?

  • IBM needs additional customization around the actual mirroring of images to enable CloudPaks to fully adopt OLM-style operator packaging and catalog management
  • IBM CloudPaks introduce additional compute architectures, increasing the download volume by 2/3rds to day, we need the ability to effectively filter non-required image versions of OLM operator catalogs during filtering for other customers that only require a single or a subset of the available image architectures
  • IBM CloudPaks regularly run on older OCP versions like 4.8 which require additional work to be able to read the mirrored catalog produced by oc mirror

Scenarios

  1. Customers can use the oc utility and delegate the actual image mirror step to another tool
  2. Customers can mirror between disconnected registries using the oc utility
  3. The oc utility supports filtering manifest lists in the context of multi-arch images according to the sparse manifest list proposal in the distribution spec

Acceptance Criteria

  • Customers can use the oc utility to mirror between two different air-gapped environments
  • Customers can specify the desired computer architectures and oc mirror will create sparse manifest lists in the target registry as a result

Dependencies (internal and external)

Previous Work:

  1. WRKLDS-369
  2. Disconnected Mirroring Improvement Proposal

Related Work:

  1. https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/pull/310
  2. https://github.com/distribution/distribution/pull/3536
  3. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10ozLoV7sVPLB8msLx4LYamooQDSW-CAnLiNiJ9SER2k/edit?usp=sharing

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

Overview 

HyperShift came to life to serve multiple goals, some are main near-term, some are secondary that serve well long-term. 

Main Goals for hosted control planes (HyperShift)

  • Optimize OpenShift for Cost/footprint/ which improves our competitive stance against the *KSes
  • Establish separation of concerns which makes it more resilient for SRE to manage their workload clusters (be it security, configuration management, etc).
  • Simplify and enhance multi-cluster management experience especially since multi-cluster is becoming an industry need nowadays. 

Secondary Goals

HyperShift opens up doors to penetrate the market. HyperShift enables true hybrid (CP and Workers decoupled, mixed IaaS, mixed Arch,...). An architecture that opens up more options to target new opportunities in the cloud space. For more details on this one check: Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

 

Hosted Control Planes (HyperShift) Map 

To bring hosted control planes to our customers, we need the means to ship it. Today MCE is how HyperShift shipped, and installed so that customers can use it. There are two main customers for hosted-control-planes: 

 

  • Self-managed: In that case, Red Hat would provide hosted control planes as a service that is managed and SREed by the customer for their tenants (hence “self”-managed). In this management model, our external customers are the direct consumers of the multi-cluster control plane as a servie. Once MCE is installed, they can start to self-service dedicated control planes. 

 

  • Managed: This is OpenShift as a managed service, today we only “manage” the CP, and share the responsibility for other system components, more info here. To reduce management costs incurred by service delivery organizations which translates to operating profit (by reducing variable costs per control-plane), as well as to improve user experience, lower platform overhead (allow customers to focus mostly on writing applications and not concern themselves with infrastructure artifacts), and improve the cluster provisioning experience. HyperShift is shipped via MCE, and delivered to Red Hat managed SREs (same consumption route). However, for managed services, additional tooling needs to be refactored to support the new provisioning path. Furthermore, unlike self-managed where customers are free to bring their own observability stack, Red Hat managed SREs need to observe the managed fleet to ensure compliance with SLOs/SLIs/…

 

If you have noticed, MCE is the delivery mechanism for both management models. The difference between managed and self-managed is the consumer persona. For self-managed, it's the customer SRE for managed its the RH SRE

High-level Requirements

For us to ship HyperShift in the product (as hosted control planes) in either management model, there is a necessary readiness checklist that we need to satisfy. Below are the high-level requirements needed before GA: 

 

  • Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story (with MCE)
  • Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption  
  • Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components.  
  • Hosted control planes has an HA and a DR story
  • Hosted control planes is in parity with top-level add-on operators 
  • Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption
  • Hosted control planes is observable  
  • HyperShift as a backend to managed services is fully unblocked.

 

Please also have a look at our What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness? doc. 

Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story

Multi-cluster is becoming an industry need today not because this is where trend is going but because it’s the only viable path today to solve for many of our customer’s use-cases. Below is some reasoning why multi-cluster is a NEED:

 

 

As a result, multi-cluster management is a defining category in the market where Red Hat plays a key role. Today Red Hat solves for multi-cluster via RHACM and MCE. The goal is to simplify fleet management complexity by providing a single pane of glass to observe, secure, police, govern, configure a fleet. I.e., the operand is no longer one cluster but a set, a fleet of clusters. 

HyperShift logically centralized architecture, as well as native separation of concerns and superior cluster lifecyle management experience, makes it a great fit as the foundation of our multi-cluster management story. 

Thus the following stories are important for HyperShift: 

  • When lifecycling OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported providers from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to use a consistent UI so I can manage and operate (observe, govern,...) a fleet of clusters.
  • I want to specify HA constraints (e.g., deploy my clusters in different regions) while ensuring acceptable QoS (e.g., latency boundaries) to ensure/reduce any potential downtime for my workloads. 
  • When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported provider from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to backup any critical data so I am able to restore them in case of hosting service cluster (management cluster) failure. 

Refs:

Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption.

 

HyperShift is the core engine that will be used to provide hosted control-planes for consumption in managed and self-managed. 

 

Main user story:  When life cycling clusters as a cluster service consumer via HyperShift core APIs, I want to use a stable/backward compatible API that is less susceptible to future changes so I can provide availability guarantees. 

 

Ref: What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness?

Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components. 

 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumptions

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

HyperShift - proposed cuts from data plane

HyperShift has an HA and a DR story

When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin) I want to be able to migrate CPs from one hosting service cluster to another:

  • as means for disaster recovery in the case of total failure
  • so that scaling pressures on a management cluster can be mitigated or a management cluster can be decommissioned.

More information: 

 

Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption

To understand usage patterns and inform our decision making for the product. We need to be able to measure adoption and assess usage.

See Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

Hosted control plane is observable  

Whether it's managed or self-managed, it’s pertinent to report health metrics to be able to create meaningful Service Level Objectives (SLOs), alert of failure to meet our availability guarantees. This is especially important for our managed services path. 

HyperShift is in parity with top-level add-on operators

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-8901 

Unblock HyperShift as a backend to managed services

HyperShift for managed services is a strategic company goal as it improves usability, feature, and cost competitiveness against other managed solutions, and because managed services/consumption-based cloud services is where we see the market growing (customers are looking to delegate platform overhead). 

 

We should make sure our SD milestones are unblocked by the core team. 

 

Note 

This feature reflects HyperShift core readiness to be consumed. When all related EPICs and stories in this EPIC are complete HyperShift can be considered ready to be consumed in GA form. This does not describe a date but rather the readiness of core HyperShift to be consumed in GA form NOT the GA itself.

- GA date for self-managed will be factoring in other inputs such as adoption, customer interest/commitment, and other factors. 
- GA dates for ROSA-HyperShift are on track, tracked in milestones M1-7 (have a look at https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-5771

Epic Goal*

The goal is to split client certificate trust chains from the global Hypershift root CA.

 
Why is this important? (mandatory)

This is important to:

  • assure a workload can be run on any kind of OCP flavor
  • reduce the blast radius in case of a sensitive material leak
  • separate trust to allow more granular control over client certificate authentication

 
Scenarios (mandatory) 

Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

  1. I would like to be able to run my workloads on any OpenShift-like platform.
    My workloads allow components to authenticate using client certificates based
    on a trust bundle that I am able to retrieve from the cluster.
  1. I don't want my users to have access to any CA bundle that would allow them
    to trust a random certificate from the cluster for client certificate authentication.

 
Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

Hypershift team needs to provide us with code reviews and merge the changes we are to deliver

Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

  • Development - OpenShift Auth, Hypershift
  • Documentation -OpenShift Auth Docs team
  • QE - OpenShift Auth QE
  • PX - I have no idea what PX is
  • Others - others

Acceptance Criteria (optional)

The serviceaccount CA bundle automatically injected to all pods cannot be used to authenticate any client certificate generated by the control-plane.

Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

Risk: there is a throbbing time pressure as this should be delivered before first stable Hypershift release

Done - Checklist (mandatory)

  • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
  • Documentation - Content development is complete.
  • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
  • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
  • Engineering Stories Merged
  • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
  • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Cloned from OCPSTRAT-377 to represent the backport to 4.12

Backport questions:

 
1) What's the impact/cost to any other critical items on the next release? 
 
Installer and edge are mostly focused on activation/retention and working the list top-to-bottom without release blockers. This is an activation item highly coveted by SD and applicable in existing versions.
 
2) Is it a breaking change to the existing fleet?
 
No.
 
 

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Enable/confirm installation in AWS shared VPC scenario where Private Hosted Zone belongs to an account separate from the cluster installation target account

Why is this important?

  • AWS best practices suggest this setup

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic —

Links:

Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1397 

API PR: https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1460 

Ingress  Operator PR: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/928 

Background

Feature Goal: Support OpenShift installation in AWS Shared VPC scenario where AWS infrastructure resources (at least the Private Hosted Zone) belong to an account separate from the cluster installation target account.

The ingress operator is responsible for creating DNS records in AWS Route53 for cluster ingress. Prior to the implementation of this epic, the ingress operator doesn't have the capability to add DNS records into an existing Route 53 hosted zone in the shared VPC.

Epic Goal

  • Add support to the ingress operator for creating DNS records in preexisting Route53 private hosted zones for Shared VPC clusters

Non-Goals

  • Ingress operator support for day-2 operations (i.e. changes to the AWS IAM Role value after installation)  
  • E2E testing (will be handled by the Installer Team) 

Design

As described in the WIP PR https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/928, the ingress operator will consume a new API field that contains the IAM Role ARN for configuring DNS records in the private hosted zone. If this field is present, then the ingress operator will use this account to create all private hosted zone records. The API fields will be described in the Enhancement PR.

The ingress operator code will accomplish this by defining a new provider implementation that wraps two other DNS providers, using one of them to publish records to the public zone and the other to publish records to the private zone.

External DNS Operator Impact

See NE-1299

AWS Load Balancer Operator (ALBO) Impact

See NE-1299

Why is this important?

  • Without this ingress operator support, OpenShift users are unable to create DNS records in a preexisting Route53 private hosted zone which means OpenShift users can't share the Route53 component with a Shared VPC
  • Shared VPCs are considers AWS best practice

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • Unit tests must be written and automatically run in CI (E2E tests will be handled by the Installer Team)
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Ingress Operator creates DNS Records in preexisting Route53 private hosted zones for shared VPC Clusters
  • Network Edge Team has reviewed all of the related enhancements and code changes for Route53 in Shared VPC Clusters

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Installer Team is adding the new API fields required for enabling sharing Route53 with in Shared VPCs in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CORS-2613
  2. Testing this epic requires having access to two AWS account

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. Significant discussion was done in this thread: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C68TNFWA2/p1681997102492889?thread_ts=1681837202.378159&cid=C68TNFWA2
  1. Slack channel #tmp-xcmbu-114

Open questions:

  1.  

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

Customers can trust the metadata in our operators catalogs to reason about infrastructure compatibility and interoperability. Similar to OCPPLAN-7983 the requirement is that this data is present for every layered product and Red Hat-release operator and ideally also ISV operators.

Today it is hard to validate the presence of this data due to the metadata format. This features tracks introducing a new format, implementing the appropriate validation and enforcement of presence as well as defining a grace period in which both formats are acceptable.

Goals (aka. expected user outcomes)

Customers can rely on the operator metadata as the single source of truth for capability and interoperability information instead of having to look up product-specific documentation. They can use this data to filter in on-cluster and public catalog displays as well as in their pipelines or custom workflows.

Red Hat Operators are required to provide this data and we aim for near 100% coverage in our catalogs.

Absence of this data can reliably be detected and will subsequently lead to gating in the release process.

Requirements (aka. Acceptance Criteria):

  • discrete annotations per feature that can be checked for presence as well as positive and negative values (see PORTEANBLE-525)
  • support in the OCP console and RHEC to support both the new and the older metadata annotations format
  • enforcement in ISV and RHT operator release pipelines
    • first with non-fatal warnings
    • later with blocking behavior if annotations are missing
    • the presence of ALL annotations needs to be checked in all pipelines / catalogs

Questions to Answer:

  • when can we rollout the pipeline tests?
    • only when there is support for visualization in the OCP Console and catalog.redhat.com
  • should operator authors use both, old and new annotations at the same time?
    • they can, but there is no requirement to do that, once the support in console and RHEC is there, the pipelines will only check for the new annotations
  • what happens to older OCP releases that don't support the new annotations yet?
    • the only piece in OCP that is aware of the annotations is the console, and we plan to backport the changes all the way to 4.10

 

Customer Considerations

Provide any additional customer-specific considerations that must be made when designing and delivering the Feature.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

 

Documentation Considerations

  • we first need internal documentation for RHT and ISV teams that need to implement the change
  • when RHEC and Console are ready, we will update the external documentation and and can point to that as the official source of truth

 

Interoperability Considerations

  • OCP Console will have to support the new format (see CONSOLE-3688) in parallel to the old format (as fallback) in all currently supported OCP versions

Epic Goal

  • Transparently support old and new infrastructure annotations format delivered by OLM-packaged operators

Why is this important?

  • As part of part of OCPSTRAT-288 we are looking to improve the metadata quality of Red Hat operators in OpenShift
  • via PORTENABLE-525 we are defining a new metadata format that supports the aforementioned initiative with more robust detection of individual infrastructure features via boolean data types

Scenarios

  1. A user can use the OCP console to browse through the OperatorHub catalog and filter for all the existing and new annotations defined in PORTENABLE-525
  2. A user reviewing an operator's detail can see the supported infrastructures transparently regardless if the operator uses the new or the existing annotations format

Acceptance Criteria

  • the new annotation format is supported in operatorhub filtering and operator details pages
  • the old annotation format keeps being supported in operatorhub filtering and operator details pages
  • the console will respect both the old and the new annotations format
  • when for a particular feature both the operator denotes data in both the old and new annotation format, the annotations in the newer format take precedence
  • the newer infrastructure features from PORTENABLE-525 tls-profiles and token-auth/* do not have equivalents in the old annotation format and evaluation doesn't need to fall back as described in the previous point

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. none

Open Questions

  1. due to the non-intrusive nature of this feature, can we ship it in a 4.14.z patch release?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Feature Overview

Telecommunications providers continue to deploy OpenShift at the Far Edge. The acceleration of this adoption and the nature of existing Telecommunication infrastructure and processes drive the need to improve OpenShift provisioning speed at the Far Edge site and the simplicity of preparation and deployment of Far Edge clusters, at scale.

Goals

  • Simplicity The folks preparing and installing OpenShift clusters (typically SNO) at the Far Edge range in technical expertise from technician to barista. The preparation and installation phases need to be reduced to a human-readable script that can be utilized by a variety of non-technical operators. There should be as few steps as possible in both the preparation and installation phases.
  • Minimize Deployment Time A telecommunications provider technician or brick-and-mortar employee who is installing an OpenShift cluster, at the Far Edge site, needs to be able to do it quickly. The technician has to wait for the node to become in-service (CaaS and CNF provisioned and running) before they can move on to installing another cluster at a different site. The brick-and-mortar employee has other job functions to fulfill and can't stare at the server for 2 hours. The install time at the far edge site should be in the order of minutes, ideally less than 20m.
  • Utilize Telco Facilities Telecommunication providers have existing Service Depots where they currently prepare SW/HW prior to shipping servers to Far Edge sites. They have asked RH to provide a simple method to pre-install OCP onto servers in these facilities. They want to do parallelized batch installation to a set of servers so that they can put these servers into a pool from which any server can be shipped to any site. They also would like to validate and update servers in these pre-installed server pools, as needed.
  • Validation before Shipment Telecommunications Providers incur a large cost if forced to manage software failures at the Far Edge due to the scale and physical disparate nature of the use case. They want to be able to validate the OCP and CNF software before taking the server to the Far Edge site as a last minute sanity check before shipping the platform to the Far Edge site.
  • IPSec Support at Cluster Boot Some far edge deployments occur on an insecure network and for that reason access to the host’s BMC is not allowed, additionally an IPSec tunnel must be established before any traffic leaves the cluster once its at the Far Edge site. It is not possible to enable IPSec on the BMC NIC and therefore even OpenShift has booted the BMC is still not accessible.

Requirements

  • Factory Depot: Install OCP with minimal steps
    • Telecommunications Providers don't want an installation experience, just pick a version and hit enter to install
    • Configuration w/ DU Profile (PTP, SR-IOV, see telco engineering for details) as well as customer-specific addons (Ignition Overrides, MachineConfig, and other operators: ODF, FEC SR-IOV, for example)
    • The installation cannot increase in-service OCP compute budget (don't install anything other that what is needed for DU)
    • Provide ability to validate previously installed OCP nodes
    • Provide ability to update previously installed OCP nodes
    • 100 parallel installations at Service Depot
  • Far Edge: Deploy OCP with minimal steps
    • Provide site specific information via usb/file mount or simple interface
    • Minimize time spent at far edge site by technician/barista/installer
    • Register with desired RHACM Hub cluster for ongoing LCM
  • Minimal ongoing maintenance of solution
    • Some, but not all telco operators, do not want to install and maintain an OCP / ACM cluster at Service Depot
  • The current IPSec solution requires a libreswan container to run on the host so that all N/S OCP traffic is encrypted. With the current IPSec solution this feature would need to support provisioning host-based containers.

 

A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts.  If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

requirement Notes isMvp?
     
     
     

 

Describe Use Cases (if needed)

Telecommunications Service Provider Technicians will be rolling out OCP w/ a vDU configuration to new Far Edge sites, at scale. They will be working from a service depot where they will pre-install/pre-image a set of Far Edge servers to be deployed at a later date. When ready for deployment, a technician will take one of these generic-OCP servers to a Far Edge site, enter the site specific information, wait for confirmation that the vDU is in-service/online, and then move on to deploy another server to a different Far Edge site.

 

Retail employees in brick-and-mortar stores will install SNO servers and it needs to be as simple as possible. The servers will likely be shipped to the retail store, cabled and powered by a retail employee and the site-specific information needs to be provided to the system in the simplest way possible, ideally without any action from the retail employee.

 

Out of Scope

Q: how challenging will it be to support multi-node clusters with this feature?

Background, and strategic fit

< What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? >

Assumptions

< Are there assumptions being made regarding prerequisites and dependencies?>

< Are there assumptions about hardware, software or people resources?>

Customer Considerations

< Are there specific customer environments that need to be considered (such as working with existing h/w and software)?>

< Are there Upgrade considerations that customers need to account for or that the feature should address on behalf of the customer?>

<Does the Feature introduce data that could be gathered and used for Insights purposes?>

Documentation Considerations

< What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)? >

< What does success look like?>

< Does this feature have doc impact?  Possible values are: New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact>

< If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy. If yes, complete the following.>

  • <What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?>
  • <How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?>
  • <What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?>
  • <Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available. >
  • <What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?>

Interoperability Considerations

< Which other products and versions in our portfolio does this feature impact?>

< What interoperability test scenarios should be factored by the layered product(s)?>

Questions

Question Outcome
   

 

 

Epic Goal

  • Install SNO within 10 minutes

Why is this important?

  • SNO installation takes around 40+ minutes.
  • This makes SNO less appealing when compared to k3s/microshift.
  • We should analyze the  SNO installation, figure our why it takes so long and come up with ways to optimize it

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ULmKBzfT7MibbTS6Sy3cNtjqDX1o7Q0Rek3tAe1LSGA/edit?usp=sharing

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14416. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When installing SNO with bootstrap in place the cluster-policy-controller hangs for 6 minutes waiting for the lease to be acquired. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Run the PoC using the makefile here https://github.com/eranco74/bootstrap-in-place-poc
2.Observe the cluster-policy-controller logs post reboot

Actual results:

I0530 16:01:18.011988       1 leaderelection.go:352] lock is held by leaderelection.k8s.io/unknown and has not yet expired
I0530 16:01:18.012002       1 leaderelection.go:253] failed to acquire lease kube-system/cluster-policy-controller-lock
I0530 16:07:31.176649       1 leaderelection.go:258] successfully acquired lease kube-system/cluster-policy-controller-lock

Expected results:

Expected the bootstrap cluster-policy-controller to release the lease so that the cluster-policy-controller running post reboot won't have to wait the lease to expire.  

Additional info:

Suggested resolution for bootstrap in place: https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/7219/files#diff-f12fbadd10845e6dab2999e8a3828ba57176db10240695c62d8d177a077c7161R44-R59

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

We plan to build Ironic Container Images using RHEL9 as base image in OCP 4.12

This is required because the ironic components have abandoned support for CentOS Stream 8 and Python 3.6/3.7 upstream during the most recent development cycle that will produce the stable Zed release, in favor of CentOS Stream 9 and Python 3.8/3.9

More info on RHEL8 to RHEL9 transition in OCP can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N8KyDY7KmgUYA9EOtDDQolebz0qi3nhT20IOn4D-xS4

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a SRE, I want hypershift operator to expose a metric when hosted control plane is ready. 

This should allow SRE to tune (or silence) alerts occurring while the hosted control plane is spinning up. 

 

 

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The Kube APIServer has a sidecar to output audit logs. We need similar sidecars for other APIServers that run on the control plane side. We also need to pass the same audit log policy that we pass to the KAS to these other API servers.

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Place holder epic to track spontaneous task which does not deserve its own epic.

AWS has a hard limit of 100 OIDC providers globally. 
Currently each HostedCluster created by e2e creates its own OIDC provider, which results in hitting the quota limit frequently and causing the tests to fail as a result.

 
DOD:
Only a single OIDC provider should be created and shared between all e2e HostedClusters. 

DoD:

At the moment if the input etcd kms encryption (key and role) is invalid we fail transparently.

We should check that both key and role are compatible/operational for a given cluster and fail in a condition otherwise

Once the HostedCluster and NodePool gets stopped using PausedUntil statement, the awsprivatelink controller will continue reconciling.

 

How to test this:

  • Deploy a private cluster
  • Put it in pause once deployed
  • Delete the AWSEndPointService and the Service from the HCP namespace
  • And wait for a reconciliation, the result it's that they should not be recreated
  • Unpause it and wait for recreation.

AC:

We have connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs flag in konnectiviy socks5 proxy to dial directly to cloud providers without going through konnectivity.

This introduce another path for exception https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1722

We should consolidate both by keep using connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs until there's a reason to not.

 

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem? 

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb  

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

Scenarios
1. …

Acceptance Criteria

  • (Enter a list of Acceptance Criteria unique to the Epic)

Dependencies (internal and external)
1. …

Previous Work (Optional):
1. …

Open questions::
1. …

Done Checklist

  • CI - For new features (non-enablement), existing Multi-Arch CI jobs are not broken by the Epic
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - If the Epic is adding a new stream, downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Test Plan tracking software (e.g. Polarion, RQM, etc.): <link or reference to the Test Plan>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • QE - QE to verify documentation when testing
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • All the stories, tasks, sub-tasks and bugs that belong to this epic need to have been completed and indicated by a status of 'Done'.

This is a clone of issue MULTIARCH-3683. The following is the description of the original issue:

Flags similar to these https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/main/cmd/cluster/powervs/create.go#L57toL61 from create command are missing in destroy command, so that infra destroy functionality not getting these flags for proper destroy of infra with existing resources.

This is a clone of issue MULTIARCH-3708. The following is the description of the original issue:

Following issues need to be take care on cluster deletion with resource reuse flags.

  1. Currently it's trying to remove DHCP server on an existing PowerVS instance, need to reuse the existing one to keep it simple.
  2. In case reusing existing VPC, load balancer is not getting removed. 

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)   

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Any ERRORs produces by TuneD will result in Degraded Tuned Profiles.  Cleanup upstream and NTO/PPC-shipped TuneD profiles and add ways of limiting the ERROR message count.
  • Review the policy of restarting TuneD on errors every resync period.  See: OCPBUGS-11150

Why is this important?

  •  

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/PSAP-908

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of problem:

CU cluster of the Mavenir deployment has cluster-node-tuning-operator in a CrashLoopBackOff state and does not apply performance profile

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.14rc0 and 4.14rc1

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy CU cluster with ZTP gitops method
2. Wait for Policies to be complient
3. Check worker nodes and cluster-node-tuning-operator status 

Actual results:

Nodes do not have performance profile applied
cluster-node-tuning-operator is crashing with following in logs:

E0920 12:16:57.820680       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: &runtime.TypeAssertionError{_interface:(*runtime._type)(nil), concrete:(*runtime._type)(nil), asserted:(*runtime._type)(0x1e68ec0), missingMethod:""} (interface conversion: interface is nil, not v1.Object)
goroutine 615 [running]:
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic({0x1c98c20?, 0xc0006b7a70})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:75 +0x99
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash({0x0, 0x0, 0xc000d49500?})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:49 +0x75
panic({0x1c98c20, 0xc0006b7a70})
        /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:884 +0x213
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/util.ObjectInfo({0x0?, 0x0})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/util/objectinfo.go:10 +0x39
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*ProfileCalculator).machineConfigLabelsMatch(0xc000a23ca0?, 0xc000445620, {0xc0001b38e0, 0x1, 0xc0010bd480?})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/profilecalculator.go:374 +0xc7
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*ProfileCalculator).calculateProfile(0xc000607290, {0xc000a40900, 0x33})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/profilecalculator.go:208 +0x2b9
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*Controller).syncProfile(0xc000195b00, 0x0?, {0xc000a40900, 0x33})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/controller.go:664 +0x6fd
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*Controller).sync(0xc000195b00, {{0x1f48661, 0x7}, {0xc000000fc0, 0x26}, {0xc000a40900, 0x33}, {0x0, 0x0}})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/controller.go:371 +0x1571
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*Controller).eventProcessor.func1(0xc000195b00, {0x1dd49c0?, 0xc000d49500?})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/controller.go:193 +0x1de
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*Controller).eventProcessor(0xc000195b00)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/controller.go:212 +0x65
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil.func1(0x30?)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/backoff.go:226 +0x3e
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil(0x0?, {0x224ee20, 0xc000c48ab0}, 0x1, 0xc00087ade0)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/backoff.go:227 +0xb6
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntil(0x0?, 0x3b9aca00, 0x0, 0x0?, 0xc0004e6710?)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/backoff.go:204 +0x89
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.Until(0xc0004e67d0?, 0x91af86?, 0xc000ace0c0?)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/backoff.go:161 +0x25
created by github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*Controller).run
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/controller.go:1407 +0x1ba5
panic: interface conversion: interface is nil, not v1.Object [recovered]
        panic: interface conversion: interface is nil, not v1.Object

Expected results:

cluster-node-tuning-operator is functional, performance profiles applied to worker nodes

Additional info:

There is no issue on a DU node of the same deployment coming from same repository, DU node is configured as requested and cluster-node-tuning-operator is functioning correctly.

must gather from rc0: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DlzrjQiKTVnQKXdcRIijBkEKjAGsOFn1/view?usp=sharing
must gather from rc1: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qSqQtIunQe5e1hDVDYwa90L9MpEjEA4j/view?usp=sharing

performance profile: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/agurenko/mavenir-ztp/-/blob/airtel-4.14/policygentemplates/group-cu-mno-ranGen.yaml

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7973. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

After destroyed the private cluster, the cluster's dns records left.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2023-02-26-022418 
4.13.0-0.nightly-2023-02-26-081527 

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.create a private cluster
2.destroy the cluster
3.check the dns record  
$ibmcloud dns zones | grep private-ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (base_domain)
3c7af30d-cc2c-4abc-94e1-3bcb36e01a9b   private-ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com     PENDING_NETWORK_ADD
$zone_id=3c7af30d-cc2c-4abc-94e1-3bcb36e01a9b
$ibmcloud dns resource-records $zone_id
CNAME:520c532f-ca61-40eb-a04e-1a2569c14a0b   api-int.ci-op-wkb4fgd6-eef7e.private-ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com   CNAME   60    10a7a6c7-jp-tok.lb.appdomain.cloud   
CNAME:751cf3ce-06fc-4daf-8a44-bf1a8540dc60   api.ci-op-wkb4fgd6-eef7e.private-ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com       CNAME   60    10a7a6c7-jp-tok.lb.appdomain.cloud   
CNAME:dea469e3-01cd-462f-85e3-0c1e6423b107   *.apps.ci-op-wkb4fgd6-eef7e.private-ibmcloud.qe.devcluster.openshift.com    CNAME   120   395ec2b3-jp-tok.lb.appdomain.cloud 

Actual results:

the dns records of the cluster were left

Expected results:

created dns record by installer are all deleted, after destroyed the cluster

Additional info:

this block create private cluster later, caused the maximum limit of 5 wildcard records are easily reached. (qe account limitation)
checking the *ingress-operator.log of the failed cluster, got the error: "createOrUpdateDNSRecord: failed to create the dns record: Reached the maximum limit of 5 wildcard records."

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11333. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10690. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

according to PR: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1824, startupProbe for UWM prometheus/platform prometheus should be 1 hour, but startupProbe for UWM prometheus is still 15m after enabled UWM, platform promethues does not have issue, startupProbe is increased to 1 hour

$ oc -n openshift-user-workload-monitoring get pod prometheus-user-workload-0 -oyaml | grep startupProbe -A20
    startupProbe:
      exec:
        command:
        - sh
        - -c
        - if [ -x "$(command -v curl)" ]; then exec curl --fail http://localhost:9090/-/ready;
          elif [ -x "$(command -v wget)" ]; then exec wget -q -O /dev/null http://localhost:9090/-/ready;
          else exit 1; fi
      failureThreshold: 60
      periodSeconds: 15
      successThreshold: 1
      timeoutSeconds: 3
...

$ oc -n openshift-monitoring get pod prometheus-k8s-0 -oyaml | grep startupProbe -A20
    startupProbe:
      exec:
        command:
        - sh
        - -c
        - if [ -x "$(command -v curl)" ]; then exec curl --fail http://localhost:9090/-/ready;
          elif [ -x "$(command -v wget)" ]; then exec wget -q -O /dev/null http://localhost:9090/-/ready;
          else exit 1; fi
      failureThreshold: 240
      periodSeconds: 15
      successThreshold: 1
      timeoutSeconds: 3

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13.0-0.nightly-2023-03-19-052243

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. enable UWM, check startupProbe for UWM prometheus/platform prometheus
2.
3.

Actual results:

startupProbe for UWM prometheus is still 15m

Expected results:

startupProbe for UWM prometheus should be 1 hour

Additional info:

since startupProbe for platform prometheus is increased to 1 hour, and no similar bug for UWM prometheus, won't fix the issue is OK.

 As mentioned in AITRIAGE-3520, there multiple attempts to grab controller logs might fail at some point and override existing logs.

In the case of the ticket I mentioned, we were able to retrieve controller logs from the logs server. However, this might not always be the case for other clusters.

We need to find a way to preserve all logs, or time out log collection differently.

 

The way we thought it can be handled is by writing logs inside container and in case kube-api is not reachable we will read logs from file

Omer Tuchfeld Nir Magnezi  Mat Kowalski 

There is a bug where creating OLM subscription manifests early in the installation process results in those OLM operators not being installed.

This is because the OLM installation Jobs fail when they are tried early in the installation process, and OLM does not retry those jobs sufficiently and eventually gives up on them.

This should be solved starting OCP 4.12, but until then, we should solve this using Assisted.

A way to solve this is to delay the installation of OLM operators to only occur after the cluster is up and healthy. 

This can be done by creating the subscriptions with "installPlanApproval" set to "Manual" instead of "Automatic". Then once the cluster is up and healthy, the assisted-controller should approve the InstallPlans that OLM will create for the operators. This will then trigger the installation which is more likely to succeed since the cluster is up and healthy at this point

Description of problem:

The alertmanager pod is stuck on OCP 4.11 with OVN in container Creating State

From oc describe alertmanager pod:
...
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age                  From     Message
  ----     ------                  ----                 ----     -------
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  16s (x459 over 17h)  kubelet  (combined from similar events): Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0_openshift-storage_3a55ed54-4eaa-4f65-8a10-e5d21fad1ebc_0(88575547dc0b210307b89dd2bb8e379ece0962b607ac2707a1c2cf630b1aaa78): error adding pod openshift-storage_alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): [openshift-storage/alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0/3a55ed54-4eaa-4f65-8a10-e5d21fad1ebc:ovn-kubernetes]: error adding container to network "ovn-kubernetes": CNI request failed with status 400: '[openshift-storage/alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0 88575547dc0b210307b89dd2bb8e379ece0962b607ac2707a1c2cf630b1aaa78] [openshift

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.11 with OVN

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Terminate the node on which alertmanager pod is running
2. pod will get stuck in container Creating state
3.

Actual results:

AlertManager pod is stuck in container Creating state

Expected results:

Alertmanager pod is ready

Additional info:

The workaround would be to terminate the alertmanager pod

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7879. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When adding an app via 'Add from git repo' my repo, which works with StoneSoup, throws an error around the contents of the devfile

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Go to Dev viewpoint
2. Click +Add
3. Choose 'Import from Git'
4. Enter 'https://github.com/utherp0/bootcampapp

Actual results:

"Import is not possible. o.components is not iterable"

Expected results:

The Devfile works with StoneSoup

Additional info:

Devfile at https://github.com/utherp0/hacexample/blob/main/devfile.yaml

Description of problem:

oc-mirror shouldn't clean out the operator versions that are not referenced in the channel anymore

Cu has following ImageSetConfiguration. They are running oc-mirror GitVersion: 4.11.0-2022082035.p0.g3c1c80c.assembly.stream-3c1c80c.

apiVersion: mirror.openshift.io/v1alpha2
kind: ImageSetConfiguration
mirror:
  operators:
    - catalog: registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index:v4.10
      targetName: bit-redhat-operator-catalog-platform-essentials-index
      packages:
        - name: elasticsearch-operator
          channels:
            - name: stable
          minVersion: 5.4.2
        - name: cluster-logging
          channels:
            - name: stable
          minVersion: 5.4.2

This works at first and it makes 5.4.2 available in their internal catalog. However after some time the version 5.4.2 disappears out of their catalog and we get the following error while syncing:

ERRO[0108] Operator elasticsearch-operator was not found, please check name, minVersion, maxVersion, and channels in the config file.
ERRO[0108] Operator cluster-logging was not found, please check name, minVersion, maxVersion, and channels in the config file.

The issue is that the original configured version 5.4.2 is not anymore in the catalog, which we can verify by querying the catalog:

$ oc-mirror list operators --catalog registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index:v4.10 --package elasticsearch-operator --channel stable
WARN[0022] DEPRECATION NOTICE:
Sqlite-based catalogs and their related subcommands are deprecated. Support for
them will be removed in a future release. Please migrate your catalog workflows
to the new file-based catalog format.
VERSIONS
5.5.0

$ oc-mirror list operators --catalog registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index:v4.10 --package elasticsearch-operator --channel stable-5.4
WARN[0019] DEPRECATION NOTICE:
Sqlite-based catalogs and their related subcommands are deprecated. Support for
them will be removed in a future release. Please migrate your catalog workflows
to the new file-based catalog format.
VERSIONS
5.4.4

So,
a) the version 5.4.2 completely disappeard
b) the stable channel now starts with 5.5.0

The oc-mirror would clean out the versions that are not referenced anymore and thus we would assume that 5.4.2 would be cleaned from the mirror. Which they definitely do not want to happen, since they still have that version on clusters in their environment.

It is quite tedious to keep editing the image-set.yaml for all the versions that disappear out of the catalog

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

oc-mirror GitVersion: 4.11.0-2022082035.p0.g3c1c80c.assembly.stream-3c1c80c

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create an ImageSetConfiguration to mirror a particular operator
2. Mirror the operator to mirror registry using oc-mirror
3. The specified version of the operator disappears from the catalog after a few days when there are changes in the channel and start getting the mentioned error on sync.

Actual results:

Operator disappears from the catalog

Expected results:

The mentioned version of the operator to be available in mirror registry even after it's not referenced in the channel

Additional info:


Description of problem:

We got a feedback from the support team that it is confusing to see switch in the Notifications column for the Alerting rule which have no alerts associated to it as user can not silence the Alerting rule. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. oc apply -f https://gist.githubusercontent.com/vikram-raj/727629797eb9d9bfcfa2721cae2ade86/raw/7c2305e14115a1a4f4f88ebb74cdad32cbec4132/Alerting%2520rule%2520without%2520alert 
2. navigate to the Developer perspective Observe -> Alerts
3. Try to silence the VersionAlert alerting rule, nothing will happen 

Actual results:

Silence the alerting rule using the switch will do nothing

Expected results:

No switch for silence the alerting rule should be visible if no alerts are associated to the alerting rule.

Additional info:

 

We are seeing windows to linux networking failures, across all PRs.
This is occurring across all clouds.
Example test failure

seems this could have been due to the downstream merge, the windows jobs did not pass before the PR was merged
Job that failed against the downstream merge, but did not prevent it from merging

This is blocking all PRs against the WMCO repo.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-860. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

In GCP, once an external IP address is assigned to master/infra node through GCP console, numbers of pending CSR from kubernetes.io/kubelet-serving is increasing, and the following error are reported:

I0902 10:48:29.254427       1 controller.go:121] Reconciling CSR: csr-q7bwd
I0902 10:48:29.365774       1 csr_check.go:157] csr-q7bwd: CSR does not appear to be client csr
I0902 10:48:29.371827       1 csr_check.go:545] retrieving serving cert from build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal (10.0.0.5:10250)
I0902 10:48:29.375052       1 csr_check.go:188] Found existing serving cert for build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal
I0902 10:48:29.375152       1 csr_check.go:192] Could not use current serving cert for renewal: CSR Subject Alternate Name values do not match current certificate
I0902 10:48:29.375166       1 csr_check.go:193] Current SAN Values: [build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal 10.0.0.5], CSR SAN Values: [build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal 10.0.0.5 35.211.234.95]
I0902 10:48:29.375175       1 csr_check.go:202] Falling back to machine-api authorization for build04-c92hb-master-1.c.openshift-ci-build-farm.internal
E0902 10:48:29.375184       1 csr_check.go:420] csr-q7bwd: IP address '35.211.234.95' not in machine addresses: 10.0.0.5
I0902 10:48:29.375193       1 csr_check.go:205] Could not use Machine for serving cert authorization: IP address '35.211.234.95' not in machine addresses: 10.0.0.5
I0902 10:48:29.379457       1 csr_check.go:218] Falling back to serving cert renewal with Egress IP checks
I0902 10:48:29.382668       1 csr_check.go:221] Could not use current serving cert and egress IPs for renewal: CSR Subject Alternate Names includes unknown IP addresses
I0902 10:48:29.382702       1 controller.go:233] csr-q7bwd: CSR not authorized

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.2

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Assign external IPs to master/infra node in GCP
2. oc get csr | grep kubernetes.io/kubelet-serving

Actual results:

CSRs are not approved

Expected results:

CSRs are approved

Additional info:

This issue is only happen in GCP. Same OpenShift installations in AWS do not have this issue.

It looks like the CSR are created using external IP addresses once assigned.

Ref: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C03KEQZC1L2/p1662122007083059

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4350. The following is the description of the original issue:

Steps to reproduce:
Release: 4.13.0-0.nightly-2022-11-30-183109 (latest 4.12 nightly as well)
Create a HyperShift cluster on AWS, wait til its completed rolling out
Upgrade the HostedCluster by updating its release image to a newer one
Observe the 'network' clusteroperator resource in the guest cluster as well as the 'version' clusterversion resource in the guest cluster.
When the clusteroperator resource reports the upgraded release and the clusterversion resource reports the new release as applied, take a look at the ovnkube-master statefulset in the control plane namespace of the management cluster. It is still not finished rolling out.

Expected: that the network clusteroperator reports the new version only when all components have finished rolling out.

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2102098 +++

Created attachment 1893358
web-hook-error-in-developer-console

Description of problem:
On OSD console, on one node page, select edit label from action list, when save new label, there is no response on the modal, could see a web hook error from developer console.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.18

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Login OSD console with cluster admin user.
2.On one node page, select edit label from action list, save new label.
3.

Actual results:
2. There is no response after click "Save". There is 403 forbidden error in developer console.

Expected results:
2. Should show error message on the modal after click "Save" button

Additional info:

— Additional comment from jhadvig@redhat.com on 2022-07-08 07:52:35 UTC —

@Giao so the overall issue is that we are not rendering the error as part of the modal but rather closing the modal. I could reproduce this issue in 4.12 as well.

— Additional comment from jhadvig@redhat.com on 2022-07-18 10:52:11 UTC —

      • Bug 2108030 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-20333. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-19430. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-18772. The following is the description of the original issue:

MCO installs resolve-prepender NetworkManager script on the nodes. In order to find out node details it needs to pull baremetalRuntimeCfgImage. However, this image needs to be pulled just the first time, in the followup attempts this script just verifies that this image is available.

This is not desirable in situations where mirror / quay are not available or having a temporary problem - these kind of issues should not prevent the node from starting kubelet. During certificate rotation testing I noticed that the node with a significant time skew won't start kubelet, as it tries to pull baremetalRuntimeCfgImage for kubelet to start - but the image is already on the nodes and it doesn't need refreshing.

Description of problem:

To address: 'Static Pod is managed but errored" err="managed container xxx does not have Resource.Requests'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

Already merged in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1398

Description of the problem:

During install, we assume all PVs on a host have been added to a volume group and only remove them if they are. This could let other PVs that are not attached to volume groups persist and prevent coreos from installing properly. 

Relevant assisted installer links:

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/blob/9bec593930995220a2a4550b067f5a186de3b042/src/installer/installer.go#L809 

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/blob/9bec593930995220a2a4550b067f5a186de3b042/src/ops/ops.go#L414

 

Found while investigating triage issue https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-4017 

See slack thread for more details https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C02CP89N4VC/p1663263128420489 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Create a host with a PV w/o a volume group

2. Add host to cluster and install 

3. Observe the install fail

Actual results:

Installation fails with 

"Error: checking for exclusive access to /dev/sda 
Caused by:
| 0: couldn't reread partition table: device is in use |
| 1: EBUSY: Device or resource busy" 

Expected results:

All PVs and VGs are removed so that the installation will succeed

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2532. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Upgrades from OCP 4.11.9 to the latest OCP 4.12 Nightly builds including 4.12.0-ec.4 will fail.  When the upgrade fails, there are typically two operators that never get upgraded(all others do upgrade to the targeted 4.12.x release):

dns                                        4.11.9                                     True        True          False      11h     DNS "default" reports Progressing=True: "Have 4 available DNS pods, want 5."...
machine-config                             4.11.9                                     True        False         False      14h

The dns.operator details state it is waiting for a 4/5 pods to become available:
# oc describe dns.operator/default
...
Status:
  Cluster Domain:  cluster.local
  Cluster IP:      172.30.0.10
  Conditions:
    Last Transition Time:  2022-10-18T03:21:44Z
    Message:               Enough DNS pods are available, and the DNS service has a cluster IP address.
    Reason:                AsExpected
    Status:                False
    Type:                  Degraded
    Last Transition Time:  2022-10-18T03:21:44Z
    Message:               Have 4 available DNS pods, want 5.
    Reason:                Reconciling
    Status:                True
    Type:                  Progressing

The mcp reports everything is good:
# oc get mcp
NAME     CONFIG                                             UPDATED   UPDATING   DEGRADED   MACHINECOUNT   READYMACHINECOUNT   UPDATEDMACHINECOUNT   DEGRADEDMACHINECOUNT   AGE
master   rendered-master-87fd457ffdaf49d75e62b532c22a9f1d   True      False      False      3              3                   3                     0                      14h
worker   rendered-worker-7fc68009b1facf8724cd952cb08435ff   True      False      False      2              2                   2                     0                      14h

We have performed a large number of the same upgrades, using the same configuration, and while there are times the upgrade succeeds, the large number of results do fail.  This seems to be a timing issue.  

As a current workaround, if we were to recycle the control plane nodes, the upgrade will complete successfully. 

A must-gather log is attached for review.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Tested upgrading to all the following releases:
4.12.0-ec.4
4.12.0-0.nightly-s390x-2022-10-10-005931
4.12.0-0.nightly-s390x-2022-10-15-144437

How reproducible:

Moderate to Consistently 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Start with a working OCP 4.11.9 Cluster.
2. Perform an upgrade to latest OCP 4.12.x nightly build.
3. Monitor the upgrade status:
   # oc get clusterversion
   —> will state % complete and waiting on dns - which never finishes.
   # oc get co
   —> the dns and machine-config operators will remain at 4.11.9
4. Upgrade will never complete. 

Actual results:

Upgrade will never complete.

Expected results:

Upgrade to the targeted release succeeds.

Additional info:

This upgrade issue occurs for both Connected and Disconnected Clusters.

 

Description of problem:

TestEditUnmanagedPodDisruptionBudget flakes in the console-operator e2e

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Flake

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Check https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_console-operator/665/pull-ci-openshift-console-operator-master-e2e-aws-operator/1562005782164148224
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

There is a chance that the PDB instances is not present since prior to the Unmanaged* TCs the RemoveTest is running which is removing all the console resources (Pods, Services, PDBs, ...).

 

Note: This issue is a duplicate of OCPBUGS-10238 intended to target the 4.12 version.

Description of problem:

Updates to the `.spec.updateStrategy.registryPoll.interval` fields for a default CatalogSource are reverted.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.5

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.12.5    True        False         86m     Cluster version is 4.12.5
$ oc get catalogsource  -n openshift-marketplace redhat-operators -o jsonpath='{.spec.updateStrategy.registryPoll.interval}'
10m
$ oc patch -n openshift-marketplace catalogsource/redhat-operators --type=merge -p '{"spec":{"updateStrategy":{"registryPoll":{"interval":"30m0s"}}}}'
catalogsource.operators.coreos.com/redhat-operators patched

Actual results:

$ oc get catalogsource  -n openshift-marketplace redhat-operators -o jsonpath='{.spec.updateStrategy.registryPoll.interval}' 
10m
$ oc logs -n openshift-marketplace deployment/marketplace-operator time="2023-03-14T09:43:58Z" level=info msg="[defaults] Restoring CatalogSource redhat-operators" time="2023-03-14T09:43:58Z" level=info msg="[defaults] CatalogSource redhat-operators is annotated and its spec is the same as the default spec"

Expected results:

In 4.12.3 the updated value remains:

$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.12.3    True        False         15d     Cluster version is 4.12.3
$ oc get catalogsource  -n openshift-marketplace redhat-operators -o jsonpath='{.spec.updateStrategy.registryPoll.interval}'
10m
$ oc patch -n openshift-marketplace catalogsource/redhat-operators --type=merge -p '{"spec":{"updateStrategy":{"registryPoll":{"interval":"30m0s"}}}}'
catalogsource.operators.coreos.com/redhat-operators patched
$ oc get catalogsource  -n openshift-marketplace redhat-operators -o jsonpath='{.spec.updateStrategy.registryPoll.interval}'
30m0s

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-17160. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14049. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

After all cluster operators have reconciled after the password rotation, we can still see authentication failures in keystone (attached screenshot of splunk query)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Environment:
- OpenShift 4.12.10 on OpenStack 16
- The cluster is managed via RHACM, but password rotation shall be done via "regular"  OpenShift means.

How reproducible:

Rotated the OpenStack credentials according to the documentation [1]

[1] https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/authentication/managing_cloud_provider_credentials/cco-mode-passthrough.html#manually-rotating-cloud-creds_cco-mode-passthrough 

Additional info:

- we can't trace back where these authentication failures come from - they do disappear after a cluster upgrade (so when nodes are rebooted and all pods are restarted which indicates that there's still a component using the old credentials)
- The relevant technical integration points _seem_ to be working though (LBaaS, CSI, Machine API, Swift)

What is the business impact? Please also provide timeframe information.

- We cannot rely on splunk monitoring for authentication issues since it's currently constantly showing authentication errors - We cannot be entirely sure that everything works as expected since we don't know the component that doesn't seem to use the new credentials

 

Description of problem
`oc-mirror` will hit error when use docker without namespace for OCI format mirror

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
Copy the operator image with OCI format to localhost;
cat copy.yaml
apiVersion: mirror.openshift.io/v1alpha2
kind: ImageSetConfiguration
mirror:
operators:

  • catalog: registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index:v4.11
    packages:
  • name: multicluster-engine
    minVersion: '2.1.1'
    maxVersion: '2.1.2'
    `oc-mirror --config copy.yaml oci:///home/ocmirrortest/noo --use-oci-feature --oci-feature-action=copy --continue-on-error`
    Mirror the operator image with OCI format to registry without namespace :
    cat mirror.yaml
    apiVersion: mirror.openshift.io/v1alpha2
    kind: ImageSetConfiguration
    mirror:
    operators:
  • catalog: oci:///home/ocmirrortest/noo/redhat-operator-index
    packages:
  • name: multicluster-engine
    minVersion: '2.1.1'
    maxVersion: '2.1.2'

`oc-mirror --config mirror.yaml --use-oci-feature --oci-feature-action=mirror --dest-skip-tls docker://localhost:5000`

Actual results:
2. Hit error:
`oc-mirror --config mirror.yaml --use-oci-feature --oci-feature-action=mirror --dest-skip-tls docker://localhost:5000`
……
info: Mirroring completed in 30ms (0B/s)
error: mirroring images "localhost:5000//multicluster-engine/mce-operator-bundle@sha256:e7519948bbcd521390d871ccd1489a49aa01d4de4c93c0b6972dfc61c92e0ca2" is not a valid image reference: invalid reference format

Expected results:
2. No error

Additional info:
`oc-mirror --config mirror.yaml --use-oci-feature --oci-feature-action=mirror --dest-skip-tls docker://localhost:5000/ocmir` works well.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2551. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When normal user select "All namespaces" by using the radio button "Show operands in", The ""Error Loading" error will be shown 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-192348, 4.11

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install operator "Red Hat Intergration-Camel K" on All namespace
2. Login console by using normal user
3. Navigate to "All instances" Tab for the opertor
4. Check the radio button "All namespaces" is being selected
5. Check the page 

Actual results:

The Error Loading info will be shown on page

Expected results:

The error should not shown

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2891. The following is the description of the original issue:

Deprovisioning can fail with the error:

level=warning msg=unrecognized elastic load balancing resource type listener arn=arn:aws:elasticloadbalancing:us-west-2:460538899914:listener/net/a9ac9f1b3019c4d1299e7ededc92b42b/a6f0655da877ddd4/45e05ee69d99bab0

 

Further background is available in this write up:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TsTqIVwHDmjuDjG7v06w_5AAbXSisaDX-UfUI9-GVJo/edit#

 

Incident channel:

incident-aws-leaking-tags-for-deleted-resources

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7438. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The egress service nodeSelector parsing does
not take into account wrong values that cause
errors (such as "name part must consist of alphanumeric characters"),
and the controller does not handle them gracefully given a bad input.
when a bad input is given it should log an error and ignore the service

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

create an egress service with a bad nodeSelector:
"{"nodeSelector":{"matchLabels":{"a:b": "c&"}}}"

ovnkube-master controller does not handle it gracefully

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

We need to have admin-ack in 4.12 so that admins can check the deprecated APIs and approve when they move to 4.12.Refer https://access.redhat.com/articles/6958394 for  more information. As planned we want to add the admin-ack around 4.13 feature freeze.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a cluster in 4.12. 
2. Run an application which uses the deprecated API. See https://access.redhat.com/articles/6958394 for more information.
3. Upgrade to 4.13

Actual results:

The upgrade happens without asking the admin to confirm that the worksloads do not use the deprecated APIs.

Expected results:

Upgrade should wait for the admin-ack.

Additional info:

This was the PR for 4.11.z https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/836

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4913. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Currently the Terraform code waits for 45 seconds, but anecdotal data suggest we should actually wait for 3 minutes in order to avoid "failures" due to occasional slow boots of a new VM in PowerVS.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

often enough

Steps to Reproduce:

1. run IPI installer against PowerVS
2. look for "empty tuple" in the error message when it fails to reach `bootstrap-complete`
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

VMs to always have IP address assigned by DHCP after a certain wait

Additional info:

The change has already been merged into master/4.13, but 4.12 also needs this for planned PowerVS IPI GA on the z-stream.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-9968. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8692. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

In hypershift context:
Operands managed by Operators running in the hosted control plane namespace in the management cluster do not honour affinity opinions https://hypershift-docs.netlify.app/how-to/distribute-hosted-cluster-workloads/
https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/main/support/config/deployment.go#L263-L265

These operands running management side should honour the same affinity, tolerations, node selector and priority rules than the operator.
This could be done by looking at the operator deployment itself or at the HCP resource.

multus-admission-controller
cloud-network-config-controller
ovnkube-master

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a hypershift cluster.
2. Check affinity rules and node selector of the operands above.
3.

Actual results:

Operands missing affinity rules and node selecto

Expected results:

Operands have same affinity rules and node selector than the operator

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5546. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The Machine API provider for Azure sets the MachineConfig.ObjectMeta.Name to the cluster name. The value of this field was never actually used anywhere, but was mistakenly brought across in a refactor of the machine scope

It causes a diff between the defaulted machines and the machines once the actuator has seen them, which in turn is causing issues with CPMS.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a machine with providerSpec.metadata.name unset
2. 
3.

Actual results:

Name gets populated to cluster name

Expected results:

Name should not be populated

Additional info:

 

 – NOT A BUG –
This was a story, but CI is not working for OLM project, so moved to OCPBUGS where it is. 

----------------------------

upstream the `opm alpha diff` functionality moved to `oc-mirror` team by a non-RH actor.

This story is to track downstreaming the two PRs.

The only thing to verify here is that there is no more `opm alpha diff` command. 

Other changes in the PRs are to externalize some interfaces and implement an undocumented alpha-level internal channel-level property list.

 

Description of problem:

The Console Operator has a suite of tests responsible for assuring that Console can successfully interact with Operators managed by OLM. The operator-hub.spec test references an operator no longer present in the 4.12 certified operators catalog source: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/integration-tests-cypress/tests/operator-hub.spec.ts#L64

OLM is unable to set the default catalog sources to the 4.12 image tag until the test is update to reference an operator in both the 4.11 and 4.12 images of the certified operators catalog source.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):4.12


How reproducible: always


Steps to Reproduce:

1. Update the certified operators catalogSource images to the 4.12 tag
2. Attempt to run the operatorhub.spec test suite.

Actual results:

The test fails

Expected results:

The test passes

Additional info:


This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5542. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
The project list orders projects by its name and is smart enough to keep a "numerical order" like:

  1. test-1
  2. test-2
  3. test-11

The more prominent project dropdown is not so smart and shows just a simple "ascii ordered" list:

  1. test-1
  2. test-11
  3. test-2

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8-4.13 (master)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create some new projects called test-1, test-11, test-2
2. Check the project list page (in admin perspective)
3. Check the project dropdown (in dev perspective)

Actual results:
Order is

  1. test-1
  2. test-11
  3. test-2

Expected results:
Order should be

  1. test-1
  2. test-2
  3. test-11

Additional info:
none

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1125. The following is the description of the original issue:

(originally reported in BZ as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983200)

test:
[sig-etcd][Feature:DisasterRecovery][Disruptive] [Feature:EtcdRecovery] Cluster should restore itself after quorum loss [Serial]

is failing frequently in CI, see search results:
https://search.ci.openshift.org/?maxAge=168h&context=1&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job&search=%5C%5Bsig-etcd%5C%5D%5C%5BFeature%3ADisasterRecovery%5C%5D%5C%5BDisruptive%5C%5D+%5C%5BFeature%3AEtcdRecovery%5C%5D+Cluster+should+restore+itself+after+quorum+loss+%5C%5BSerial%5C%5D

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-disruptive-4.8/1413625606435770368
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-disruptive-4.8/1415075413717159936

some brief triaging from Thomas Jungblut on:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-disruptive-4.11/1568747321334697984

it seems the last guard pod doesn't come up, etcd operator installs this properly and the revision installer also does not spout any errors. It just doesn't progress to the latest revision. At first glance doesn't look like an issue with etcd itself, but needs to be taken a closer look at for sure.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10622. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Unit test failing 

=== RUN   TestNewAppRunAll/app_generation_using_context_dir
    newapp_test.go:907: app generation using context dir: Error mismatch! Expected <nil>, got supplied context directory '2.0/test/rack-test-app' does not exist in 'https://github.com/openshift/sti-ruby'
    --- FAIL: TestNewAppRunAll/app_generation_using_context_dir (0.61s)


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

100

Steps to Reproduce:

see for example https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_oc/1376/pull-ci-openshift-oc-master-images/1638172620648091648 

Actual results:

unit tests fail

Expected results:

TestNewAppRunAll unit test should pass

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

NodePort port not accessible

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.8.20

How reproducible:

$oc -n ui-nprd get services -o wide
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE SELECTOR
docker-registry ClusterIP 10.201.219.240 <none> 5000/TCP 24d app=registry
docker-registry-lb LoadBalancer 10.201.252.253 internal-xxxxxx.xx-xxxx-1.elb.amazonaws.com 5000:30779/TCP 3d22h app=registry
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.216.26 <none> 5000:32428/TCP 3d16h app=registry

$oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxx.ca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.96
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -vz 10.81.23.96 32428
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connection timed out.

In a new-created namespaces the same deployment works:

[RHEL7:> oc project
Using project "test-c1" on server "https://api.xx.xx.xxxx.xx.xx:6443".
[RHEL7:- ~/tmp]> oc port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
Forwarding from 127.0.0.1:5000 -> 5000

[1]+ Stopped oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> bg %1
[1]+ oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000 &
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> nc -v localhost 5000
Ncat: Version 7.50 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 127.0.0.1:5000.
Handling connection for 5000

[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> kill %1
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]>
[1]+ Terminated oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get services
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.224.174 <none> 5000:31793/TCP 68s

[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get pods -o wide
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES
registry-75b7c7fd94-rx29j 1/1 Running 0 7m5s 10.201.1.29 ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal <none> <none>
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxxca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.87
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -v 10.81.23.87 31793
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 10.81.23.87:31793.

Actual results:

  • Working on new created namespace
  • Not working on already created namespace

Expected results:

  • Suppose to work on all namespaces.

Additional info:

  • This cluster get upgrade from 4.7.x to 4.8 and then they manually enable OVN.
  • The issue was happening on all namespaces but after restarting the ovnkube-master-xxxx pods only the newly created namespaces work.

Description of problem:

co/storage is not available due to csi driver not have proxy setting on ibm cloud

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

{4.12.0-0.ci-2022-10-13-233744}

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Install ocp cluster on ibm disconnected env with http proxy
Template: private-templates/functionality-testing/aos-4_12/ipi-on-ibmcloud/versioned-installer-customer_vpc-http_proxy
2.Check co/storage
oc get co/storage
NAME      VERSION                         AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
storage   4.12.0-0.ci-2022-10-13-233744   False       True          False      6h55m   IBMVPCBlockCSIDriverOperatorCRAvailable: IBMBlockDriverControllerServiceControllerAvailable: Waiting for Deployment...
3.oc get pods
NAME                                                 READY   STATUS                  RESTARTS         AGE
ibm-vpc-block-csi-controller-6c4bfc9fc-6dmz7         4/5     CrashLoopBackOff        83 (113s ago)    6h55m
ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator-7bd6fb5cdc-rktk2   1/1     Running                 1 (6h44m ago)    6h55m
ibm-vpc-block-csi-node-8s6dj                         0/3     Init:0/1                77 (5m34s ago)   6h52m
ibm-vpc-block-csi-node-9msld                         0/3     Init:Error              76 (5m49s ago)   6h47m
ibm-vpc-block-csi-node-fgs76                         0/3     Init:CrashLoopBackOff   76 (5m ago)      6h52m
ibm-vpc-block-csi-node-jd9fl                         0/3     Init:CrashLoopBackOff   75 (4m16s ago)   6h47m
ibm-vpc-block-csi-node-qkjxs                         0/3     Init:CrashLoopBackOff   77 (2m53s ago)   6h52m
ibm-vpc-block-csi-node-xbzm8                         0/3     Init:0/1                76 (5m13s ago)   6h47m
4.oc -n openshift-cluster-csi-drivers logs -c vpc-node-label-updater ibm-vpc-block-csi-node-xbzm8
{"level":"info","timestamp":"2022-10-14T09:18:32.436Z","caller":"nodeupdater/utils.go:57","msg":"Fetching secret configuration.","watcher-name":"vpc-node-label-updater"}
{"level":"info","timestamp":"2022-10-14T09:18:32.436Z","caller":"nodeupdater/utils.go:158","msg":"parsing conf file","watcher-name":"vpc-node-label-updater","confpath":"/etc/storage_ibmc/slclient.toml"}
{"level":"error","timestamp":"2022-10-14T09:19:02.437Z","caller":"nodeupdater/utils.go:96","msg":"Failed to Get IAM access token","watcher-name":"vpc-node-label-updater","error":"Post \"https://iam.cloud.ibm.com/oidc/token\": dial tcp 23.203.93.6:443: i/o timeout"}
{"level":"fatal","timestamp":"2022-10-14T09:19:02.437Z","caller":"cmd/main.go:140","msg":"Failed to read secret configuration from storage secret present in the cluster ","watcher-name":"vpc-node-label-updater","error":"Post \"https://iam.cloud.ibm.com/oidc/token\": dial tcp 23.203.93.6:443: i/o timeout"}

5.oc -n openshift-cluster-csi-drivers describe pod ibm-vpc-block-csi-node-xbzm8
Environment:
   ADDRESS:          /csi/csi.sock
   DRIVER_REGISTRATION_SOCK: /var/lib/kubelet/plugins/vpc.block.csi.ibm.io/csi.sock
   KUBE_NODE_NAME:       (v1:spec.nodeName)
Actual results:{code:none}

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Derrick got an "old and new refs are equal" on rebase error; this is similar to OCPBUGS-1899 but I think has a different root cause. In this case, when a manual rollback is performed via the bootloader, we've computed that there's an osimageurl diff between the expected and desired state, but actually the desired state is already set.

We just need to skip doing the rebase if we're already in the target state.

(A real root of this problem again is that the whole "current/desired config" thing is trying to track state independently of the bootloader...if we made node state == container image, all of that goes away. The MCO would understand that it got booted into a previous state)

Description: agent.iso is created in case of invalid macAddress

Here is the content of agent-config.yaml
--------------------------------------------
kind: AgentConfig
metadata:
name: sno-cluster
spec:
rendezvousIP: 192.168.111.80
hosts:

  • hostname: master-0
    interfaces:
  • name: eno1
    macAddress: 0000
    networkConfig:
    interfaces:
  • name: eno1
    type: ethernet
    state: up
    mac-address: 00000
    ipv4:
    enabled: true
    address:
  • ip: 192.168.111.80
    prefix-length: 23
    dhcp: false
    dns-resolver:
    config:
    server:
  • 192.168.111.1
    routes:
    config:
  • destination: 0.0.0.0/0
    next-hop-address: 192.168.111.2
    next-hop-interface: eno1
    table-id: 254
    --------------------------------------------

How reproducible:

always

Repro Steps:

1) Get the latest agent-installer and build

git clone -b agent-installer https://github.com/openshift/installer.git
cd installer/
hack/build.sh

2) Create agent.iso using agent-config and install-config files.

Expected: Installer should throw an error message something like this: hosts.host[0].interfaces.macAddress: Invalid value: “0000”: macAddress must provide the valid macAddress.
And
hosts.host[0].networkConfig.interfaces.macAddress: Invalid value: “00000”: macAddress must provide the valid macAddress.

Actual: Able to create agent.iso image.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2988. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

openshift-apiserver, openshift-oauth-apiserver and kube-apiserver pods cannot validate the certificate when trying to reach etcd reporting certificate validation errors:

}. Err: connection error: desc = "transport: authentication handshake failed: x509: certificate is valid for ::1, 127.0.0.1, ::1, fd69::2, not 2620:52:0:198::10"
W1018 11:36:43.523673      15 logging.go:59] [core] [Channel #186 SubChannel #187] grpc: addrConn.createTransport failed to connect to {
  "Addr": "[2620:52:0:198::10]:2379",
  "ServerName": "2620:52:0:198::10",
  "Attributes": null,
  "BalancerAttributes": null,
  "Type": 0,
  "Metadata": null
}. Err: connection error: desc = "transport: authentication handshake failed: x509: certificate is valid for ::1, 127.0.0.1, ::1, fd69::2, not 2620:52:0:198::10"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with single stack IPv6 via ZTP procedure

Actual results:

Deployment times out and some of the operators aren't deployed successfully.

NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   False       False         True       124m    APIServerDeploymentAvailable: no apiserver.openshift-oauth-apiserver pods available on any node....
baremetal                                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      112m    
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      115m    
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
console                                                                                                                      
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         True       121m    ClusterMemberControllerDegraded: could not get list of unhealthy members: giving up getting a cached client after 3 tries
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   False       True          True       104m    Available: The registry is removed...
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        True          True       111m    The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: DeploymentReplicasAllAvailable=False (DeploymentReplicasNotAvailable: 0/1 of replicas are available)
insights                                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      118s    
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      102m    
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         True       107m    GarbageCollectorDegraded: error fetching rules: Get "https://thanos-querier.openshift-monitoring.svc:9091/api/v1/rules": dial tcp [fd02::3c5f]:9091: connect: connection refused
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      107m    
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      117m    
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
machine-config                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      115m    
marketplace                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      116m    
monitoring                                                                      False       True          True       98m     deleting Thanos Ruler Route failed: Timeout: request did not complete within requested timeout - context deadline exceeded, deleting UserWorkload federate Route failed: Timeout: request did not complete within requested timeout - context deadline exceeded, reconciling Alertmanager Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io alertmanager-main), reconciling Thanos Querier Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io thanos-querier), reconciling Prometheus API Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io prometheus-k8s), prometheuses.monitoring.coreos.com "k8s" not found
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      104m    
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      107m    
openshift-samples                                                               False       True          False      103m    The error the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get imagestreams.image.openshift.io) during openshift namespace cleanup has left the samples in an unknown state
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      106m    
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m  

Expected results:

Deployment succeeds without issues.

Additional info:

I was unable to run must-gather so attaching the pods logs copied from the host file system.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3476. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When we detect a refs/heads/branchname we should show the label as what we have now:

- Branch: branchname

And when we detect a refs/tags/tagname we should instead show the label as:

- Tag: tagname

I haven't implemented this in cli but there is an old issue for that here openshift-pipelines/pipelines-as-code#181

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.z

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a repository
2. Trigger the pipelineruns by push or pull request event on the github  

Actual results:

We do not show tag name even is tag is present instead of branch

Expected results:

We should show tag if tag is detected and branch if branch is detedcted.

Additional info:

https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12247#issuecomment-1306879310

Currently, the AWS actuator has a static list of instance types embedded in it. This means that as new instance types are added, we have to continually update this list.

Ideally, we could fetch this information from the AWS API as we do in GCP.

DoD:

  • Investigate availability of instance memory and CPU capacity as an API on AWS
  • Determine if we can use this for the autoscaling scale from zero annotations
  • If possible, implement the change.

Description of problem:

some upgrade ci jobs from 4.11.z to 4.12 nightly build are failed, because system unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container is failed

e.g. job https://qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/view/gs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-aws-ipi-proxy-p1/1579169944476585984

omg get mcp
NAME    CONFIG                                            UPDATED  UPDATING  DEGRADED  MACHINECOUNT  READYMACHINECOUNT  UPDATEDMACHINECOUNT  DEGRADEDMACHINECOUNT  AGE
worker  rendered-worker-6e18de1272fad7a5ca1529941e3ceaed  False    True      True      3             0                  0                    1                     3h53m
master  rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4  False    True      True      3             0                  0                    1                     3h53m 

check issued node

omg get node/ip-10-0-57-74.us-east-2.compute.internal -o yaml|yq -y '.metadata.annotations'
cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig: '[{"interface":"eni-0f6de21569b5b65c8","ifaddr":{"ipv4":"10.0.48.0/20"},"capacity":{"ipv4":14,"ipv6":15}}]'
csi.volume.kubernetes.io/nodeid: '{"ebs.csi.aws.com":"i-01a34f6b5f2cd1e41"}'
machine.openshift.io/machine: openshift-machine-api/ci-op-kb95kxx9-2a438-r6z94-master-2
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/controlPlaneTopology: HighlyAvailable
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/currentConfig: rendered-master-065664319cfbaee64277097d49a8a5a6
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredConfig: rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredDrain: drain-rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/lastAppliedDrain: drain-rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/reason: 'error running systemd-run --unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container
  --collect --wait -- podman run --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json --privileged
  --pid=host --net=host --rm -v /:/run/host quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661
  rpm-ostree ex deploy-from-self /run/host: Running as unit: machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container.service


  Finished with result: exit-code


  Main processes terminated with: code=exited/status=125


  Service runtime: 2min 52ms


  CPU time consumed: 144ms


  : exit status 125'
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/state: Degraded
volumes.kubernetes.io/controller-managed-attach-detach: 'true' 

check mcd log on issued node

omg get pod -n openshift-machine-config-operator  -o json | jq -r '.items[]|select(.spec.nodeName=="ip-10-0-57-74.us-east-2.compute.internal")|.metadata.name' | grep daemon
machine-config-daemon-znbvf

2022-10-09T22:12:58.797891917Z I1009 22:12:58.797821  179598 update.go:1917] Updating OS to layered image quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661
2022-10-09T22:12:58.797891917Z I1009 22:12:58.797846  179598 rpm-ostree.go:447] Running captured: rpm-ostree --version
2022-10-09T22:12:58.815829171Z I1009 22:12:58.815800  179598 update.go:2068] rpm-ostree is not new enough for layering; forcing an update via container
2022-10-09T22:12:58.817577513Z I1009 22:12:58.817555  179598 update.go:2053] Running: systemd-run --unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container --collect --wait -- podman run --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json --privileged --pid=host --net=host --rm -v /:/run/host quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661 rpm-ostree ex deploy-from-self /run/host 
...
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z E1009 22:15:00.831949  179598 writer.go:200] Marking Degraded due to: error running systemd-run --unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container --collect --wait -- podman run --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json --privileged --pid=host --net=host --rm -v /:/run/host quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661 rpm-ostree ex deploy-from-self /run/host: Running as unit: machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container.service
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z Finished with result: exit-code
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z Main processes terminated with: code=exited/status=125
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z Service runtime: 2min 52ms
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z CPU time consumed: 144ms
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z : exit status 125

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

Steps to Reproduce:

upgrade cluster from 4.11.8 to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337  

Actual results:

upgrade is failed due to node is degraded, rpm-ostree update via container is failed

Expected results:

upgrade can be completed successfully

Additional info:

must-gather: https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-aws-ipi-proxy-p1/1579169944476585984/artifacts/aws-ipi-proxy-p1/gather-must-gather/artifacts/must-gather.tar

Other build logs of failed jobs

https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-aws-ipi-proxy-cco-manual-security-token-service-p1/1579200140067999744/build-log.txt

https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-azure-ipi-proxy-p1/1579094436883730432/build-log.txt

https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-azure-ipi-proxy-workers-rhcos-rhel8-p2/1578747158293647360/build-log.txt

AWS CPMS changes made here causes the single node clusters to fail installation
https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6172

 

Need to fix the issue by checking and not creating the CPMS manifest if the installation type is single node.

Description of problem:
ovnkube-trace fails on hypershift deployments:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066891#c8

getDatabaseURIs looks for pods with container ovnkube-master, and those don't exist in hypershift.

https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/blob/6b8acf05cb6043ebdc42d9d36e700390baabea4a/go-controller/cmd/ovnkube-trace/ovnkube-trace.go#L540
~~~
// Returns nbAddress, sbAddress, protocol == "ssl", nil
func getDatabaseURIs(coreclient *corev1client.CoreV1Client, restconfig *rest.Config, ovnNamespace string) (string, string, bool, error) {
containerName := "ovnkube-master"
var err error

found := false
var podName string

listOptions := metav1.ListOptions{}
pods, err := coreclient.Pods(ovnNamespace).List(context.TODO(), listOptions)
if err != nil

{ return "", "", false, err }

for _, pod := range pods.Items {
for _, container := range pod.Spec.Containers {
if container.Name == containerName

{ found = true podName = pod.Name break }

}
}
if !found

{ klog.V(5).Infof("Cannot find ovnkube pods with container %s", containerName) return "", "", false, fmt.Errorf("cannot find ovnkube pods with container: %s", containerName) }

~~~

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2727. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

CVO recently introduced a new precondition RecommendedUpdate[1]. While we request an upgrade to a version which is not an available update, the precondition got UnknownUpdate and blocks the upgrade.

# oc get clusterversion/version -ojson | jq -r '.status.availableUpdates'null

# oc get clusterversion/version -ojson | jq -r '.status.conditions[]|select(.type == "ReleaseAccepted")'
{
  "lastTransitionTime": "2022-10-20T08:16:59Z",
  "message": "Preconditions failed for payload loaded version=\"4.12.0-0.nightly-multi-2022-10-18-153953\" image=\"quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release-nightly@sha256:71c1912990db7933bcda1d6914228e8b9b0d36ddba265164ee33a1bca06fe695\": Precondition \"ClusterVersionRecommendedUpdate\" failed because of \"UnknownUpdate\": RetrievedUpdates=False (VersionNotFound), so the recommended status of updating from 4.12.0-0.nightly-multi-2022-10-18-091108 to 4.12.0-0.nightly-multi-2022-10-18-153953 is unknown.",
  "reason": "PreconditionChecks",
  "status": "False",
  "type": "ReleaseAccepted"
}


[1]https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/841/

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-multi-2022-10-18-091108

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a 4.12 cluster
2. Upgrade to a version which is not in the available update
# oc adm upgrade --allow-explicit-upgrade --to-image=quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release-nightly@sha256:71c1912990db7933bcda1d6914228e8b9b0d36ddba265164ee33a1bca06fe695warning: The requested upgrade image is not one of the available updates.You have used --allow-explicit-upgrade for the update to proceed anywayRequesting update to release image quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release-nightly@sha256:71c1912990db7933bcda1d6914228e8b9b0d36ddba265164ee33a1bca06fe695 

Actual results:

CVO precondition check fails and blocks upgrade

Expected results:

Upgrade proceeds

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-501. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem: 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.16

How reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Edit the apiserver resource and add spec.audit.customRules field

$ oc get apiserver cluster -o yaml
spec:
audit:
customRules:

  • group: system:authenticated:oauth
    profile: AllRequestBodies
  • group: system:authenticated
    profile: AllRequestBodies
    profile: Default

2. Allow the kube-apiserver pods to rollout new revision.
3. Once the kube-apiserver pods are in new revision execute $ oc get dc

Actual results:

Error from server (InternalError): an error on the server ("This request caused apiserver to panic. Look in the logs for details.") has prevented the request from succeeding (get deploymentconfigs.apps.openshift.io)

Expected results: The command "oc get dc" should display the deploymentconfig without any error.

Additional info:

Description of problem:

Found during 1.25 rebase work, test hit this panic in two runs of 4.12-e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi-serial:

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-kubernetes-1360-nightly-4.12-e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi-serial/1567239801269129216

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-kubernetes-1360-nightly-4.12-e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi-serial/1567066819087306752

Full error for reference:

```github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/runner.go:107 +0x96
panic({0x766b520, 0xc183570})
    runtime/panic.go:838 +0x207
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.glob..func15.4()
    k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.24.0/test/e2e/network/ingressclass.go:97 +0x284
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/leafnodes.(*runner).runSync(0x300000002?)
    github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/runner.go:113 +0xb1
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/leafnodes.(*runner).run(0xc002466e40?)
    github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/runner.go:64 +0x125
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/leafnodes.(*ItNode).Run(0x7f72ca69cfff?)
    github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/it_node.go:26 +0x7b
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/spec.(*Spec).runSample(0xc003305b30, 0xc00066b208?, {0x8faff00, 0xc00045edc0})
    github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/spec/spec.go:215 +0x28a
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/spec.(*Spec).Run(0xc003305b30, {0x8faff00, 0xc00045edc0})
    github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/spec/spec.go:138 +0xe7
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner.(*SpecRunner).runSpec(0xc002480280, 0xc003305b30)
    github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/specrunner/spec_runner.go:200 +0xe8
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner.(*SpecRunner).runSpecs(0xc002480280)
    github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/specrunner/spec_runner.go:170 +0x1a5
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner.(*SpecRunner).Run(0xc002480280)
    github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/specrunner/spec_runner.go:66 +0xc5
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/suite.(*Suite).Run(0xc0004762d0, {0x8fb0260, 0xc002ba2690}, {0x0, 0x0}, {0xc002bb8600, 0x1, 0x1}, {0x8ff18e0, 0xc00045edc0}, ...)
    github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/suite/suite.go:62 +0x4b2
github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo.(*TestOptions).Run(0xc0024b28c0, {0xc000311420, 0xc58c8b0?, 0x4f19d80?})
    github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:448 +0x32
github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util.WithCleanup(0xc002527bb8)
    github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/test.go:168 +0xad
main.newRunTestCommand.func1(0xc0024cc780?, {0xc000311420, 0x1, 0x1})
    github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:448 +0x325
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc0024cc780, {0xc0003113a0, 0x1, 0x1})
    github.com/spf13/cobra@v1.4.0/command.go:856 +0x67c
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc000c3fb80)
    github.com/spf13/cobra@v1.4.0/command.go:974 +0x3b4
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
    github.com/spf13/cobra@v1.4.0/command.go:902
main.main.func1(0xc000de1700?)
    github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:94 +0x8a
main.main()
    github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:95 +0x476

fail [runtime/panic.go:220]: Test Panicked: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
Ginkgo exit error 1: exit with code 1
```

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Test hit panic

Expected results:

No panic

Additional info:

 

These two tests are permafailing on webhook errors related to the CRD:

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should show the Provisioning Network as 'Disabled' [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should [apigroup:config.openshift.io] show the Provisioning Network as 'Disabled' [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should allow setting the ProvisioningNetwork to 'Managed' with valid settings [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

[sig-installer][Feature:baremetal][Serial] A baremetal deployment without a provisioning network should [apigroup:config.openshift.io] allow setting the ProvisioningNetwork to 'Managed' with valid settings [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-virtualmedia=all

Example run:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-virtualmedia/1567416810377056256

Sippy links:

https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=%5Bsig-installer%5D%5BFeature%3Abaremetal%5D%5BSerial%5D%20A%20baremetal%20deployment%20without%20a%20provisioning%20network%20should%20allow%20setting%20the%20ProvisioningNetwork%20to%20%27Managed%27%20with%20valid%20settings%20%5BSuite%3Aopenshift%2Fconformance%2Fserial%5D

https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=%5Bsig-installer%5D%5BFeature%3Abaremetal%5D%5BSerial%5D%20A%20baremetal%20deployment%20without%20a%20provisioning%20network%20should%20show%20the%20Provisioning%20Network%20as%20%27Disabled%27%20%5BSuite%3Aopenshift%2Fconformance%2Fserial%5D

Description of problem:

Alert actions are not triggering modal from where storage cluster can be expanded.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

1/1

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Fill up a storage cluster to 80%
2. Alert is seen in cluster dashboard.
3. Click the Add Capacity button

Actual results:

Modal is not launched.