Back to index

4.12.9

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.54

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

There is a new driver release 5.0.0 since the last rebase that includes snapshot support:

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver/releases/tag/v5.0.0

Rebase the driver on v5.0.0 and update the deployments in ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator.
There are no corresponding changes in ibm-vpc-node-label-updater since the last rebase.

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

Update the driver to the latest upstream release. Notify QE and docs with any new features and important bugfixes that need testing or documentation.

This includes ibm-vpc-node-label-updater!

(Using separate cards for each driver because these updates can be more complicated)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The End of General support for vSphere 6.7 will be on October 15, 2022. So, vSphere 6.7 will be deprecated for 4.11.

We want to encourage vSphere customers to upgrade to vSphere 7 in OCP 4.11 since VMware is EOLing (general support) for vSphere 6.7 in Oct 2022.

We want the cluster Upgradeable=false + have a strong alert pointing to our docs / requirements.

related slack: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CH06KMDRV/p1647541493096729

Epic Goal

  • Enable the migration from a storage intree driver to a CSI based driver with minimal impact to the end user, applications and cluster
  • These migrations would include, but are not limited to:
    • CSI driver for AWS EBS
    • CSI driver for GCP
    • CSI driver for Azure (file and disk)
    • CSI driver for VMware vSphere

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

This Epic tracks the GA of this feature

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift needs to maintain it's ability to enable PVCs and PVs of the main storage types
  • CSI Migration is getting close to GA, we need to have the feature fully tested and enabled in OpenShift
  • Upstream intree drivers are being deprecated to make way for the CSI drivers prior to intree driver removal

Scenarios

  1. User initiated move to from intree to CSI driver
  2. Upgrade initiated move from intree to CSI driver
  3. Upgrade from EUS to EUS

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

On new installations, we should make the StorageClass created by the CSI operator the default one. 

However, we shouldn't do that on an upgrade scenario. The main reason is that users might have set  a different quota on the CSI driver Storage Class.

Exit criteria:

  • New clusters get the CSI Storage Class as the default one.
  • Existing clusters don't get their default Storage Classes changed.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

OC mirror is GA product as of Openshift 4.11 .

The goal of this feature is to solve any future customer request for new features or capabilities in OC mirror 

Epic Goal

  • Mirror to mirror operations and custom mirroring flows required by IBM CloudPak catalog management

Why is this important?

  • IBM needs additional customization around the actual mirroring of images to enable CloudPaks to fully adopt OLM-style operator packaging and catalog management
  • IBM CloudPaks introduce additional compute architectures, increasing the download volume by 2/3rds to day, we need the ability to effectively filter non-required image versions of OLM operator catalogs during filtering for other customers that only require a single or a subset of the available image architectures
  • IBM CloudPaks regularly run on older OCP versions like 4.8 which require additional work to be able to read the mirrored catalog produced by oc mirror

Scenarios

  1. Customers can use the oc utility and delegate the actual image mirror step to another tool
  2. Customers can mirror between disconnected registries using the oc utility
  3. The oc utility supports filtering manifest lists in the context of multi-arch images according to the sparse manifest list proposal in the distribution spec

Acceptance Criteria

  • Customers can use the oc utility to mirror between two different air-gapped environments
  • Customers can specify the desired computer architectures and oc mirror will create sparse manifest lists in the target registry as a result

Dependencies (internal and external)

Previous Work:

  1. WRKLDS-369
  2. Disconnected Mirroring Improvement Proposal

Related Work:

  1. https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/pull/310
  2. https://github.com/distribution/distribution/pull/3536
  3. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10ozLoV7sVPLB8msLx4LYamooQDSW-CAnLiNiJ9SER2k/edit?usp=sharing

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

Overview 

HyperShift came to life to serve multiple goals, some are main near-term, some are secondary that serve well long-term. 

Main Goals for hosted control planes (HyperShift)

  • Optimize OpenShift for Cost/footprint/ which improves our competitive stance against the *KSes
  • Establish separation of concerns which makes it more resilient for SRE to manage their workload clusters (be it security, configuration management, etc).
  • Simplify and enhance multi-cluster management experience especially since multi-cluster is becoming an industry need nowadays. 

Secondary Goals

HyperShift opens up doors to penetrate the market. HyperShift enables true hybrid (CP and Workers decoupled, mixed IaaS, mixed Arch,...). An architecture that opens up more options to target new opportunities in the cloud space. For more details on this one check: Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

 

Hosted Control Planes (HyperShift) Map 

To bring hosted control planes to our customers, we need the means to ship it. Today MCE is how HyperShift shipped, and installed so that customers can use it. There are two main customers for hosted-control-planes: 

 

  • Self-managed: In that case, Red Hat would provide hosted control planes as a service that is managed and SREed by the customer for their tenants (hence “self”-managed). In this management model, our external customers are the direct consumers of the multi-cluster control plane as a servie. Once MCE is installed, they can start to self-service dedicated control planes. 

 

  • Managed: This is OpenShift as a managed service, today we only “manage” the CP, and share the responsibility for other system components, more info here. To reduce management costs incurred by service delivery organizations which translates to operating profit (by reducing variable costs per control-plane), as well as to improve user experience, lower platform overhead (allow customers to focus mostly on writing applications and not concern themselves with infrastructure artifacts), and improve the cluster provisioning experience. HyperShift is shipped via MCE, and delivered to Red Hat managed SREs (same consumption route). However, for managed services, additional tooling needs to be refactored to support the new provisioning path. Furthermore, unlike self-managed where customers are free to bring their own observability stack, Red Hat managed SREs need to observe the managed fleet to ensure compliance with SLOs/SLIs/…

 

If you have noticed, MCE is the delivery mechanism for both management models. The difference between managed and self-managed is the consumer persona. For self-managed, it's the customer SRE for managed its the RH SRE

High-level Requirements

For us to ship HyperShift in the product (as hosted control planes) in either management model, there is a necessary readiness checklist that we need to satisfy. Below are the high-level requirements needed before GA: 

 

  • Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story (with MCE)
  • Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption  
  • Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components.  
  • Hosted control planes has an HA and a DR story
  • Hosted control planes is in parity with top-level add-on operators 
  • Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption
  • Hosted control planes is observable  
  • HyperShift as a backend to managed services is fully unblocked.

 

Please also have a look at our What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness? doc. 

Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story

Multi-cluster is becoming an industry need today not because this is where trend is going but because it’s the only viable path today to solve for many of our customer’s use-cases. Below is some reasoning why multi-cluster is a NEED:

 

 

As a result, multi-cluster management is a defining category in the market where Red Hat plays a key role. Today Red Hat solves for multi-cluster via RHACM and MCE. The goal is to simplify fleet management complexity by providing a single pane of glass to observe, secure, police, govern, configure a fleet. I.e., the operand is no longer one cluster but a set, a fleet of clusters. 

HyperShift logically centralized architecture, as well as native separation of concerns and superior cluster lifecyle management experience, makes it a great fit as the foundation of our multi-cluster management story. 

Thus the following stories are important for HyperShift: 

  • When lifecycling OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported providers from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to use a consistent UI so I can manage and operate (observe, govern,...) a fleet of clusters.
  • I want to specify HA constraints (e.g., deploy my clusters in different regions) while ensuring acceptable QoS (e.g., latency boundaries) to ensure/reduce any potential downtime for my workloads. 
  • When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported provider from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to backup any critical data so I am able to restore them in case of hosting service cluster (management cluster) failure. 

Refs:

Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption.

 

HyperShift is the core engine that will be used to provide hosted control-planes for consumption in managed and self-managed. 

 

Main user story:  When life cycling clusters as a cluster service consumer via HyperShift core APIs, I want to use a stable/backward compatible API that is less susceptible to future changes so I can provide availability guarantees. 

 

Ref: What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness?

Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components. 

 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumptions

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

HyperShift - proposed cuts from data plane

HyperShift has an HA and a DR story

When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin) I want to be able to migrate CPs from one hosting service cluster to another:

  • as means for disaster recovery in the case of total failure
  • so that scaling pressures on a management cluster can be mitigated or a management cluster can be decommissioned.

More information: 

 

Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption

To understand usage patterns and inform our decision making for the product. We need to be able to measure adoption and assess usage.

See Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

Hosted control plane is observable  

Whether it's managed or self-managed, it’s pertinent to report health metrics to be able to create meaningful Service Level Objectives (SLOs), alert of failure to meet our availability guarantees. This is especially important for our managed services path. 

HyperShift is in parity with top-level add-on operators

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-8901 

Unblock HyperShift as a backend to managed services

HyperShift for managed services is a strategic company goal as it improves usability, feature, and cost competitiveness against other managed solutions, and because managed services/consumption-based cloud services is where we see the market growing (customers are looking to delegate platform overhead). 

 

We should make sure our SD milestones are unblocked by the core team. 

 

Note 

This feature reflects HyperShift core readiness to be consumed. When all related EPICs and stories in this EPIC are complete HyperShift can be considered ready to be consumed in GA form. This does not describe a date but rather the readiness of core HyperShift to be consumed in GA form NOT the GA itself.

- GA date for self-managed will be factoring in other inputs such as adoption, customer interest/commitment, and other factors. 
- GA dates for ROSA-HyperShift are on track, tracked in milestones M1-7 (have a look at https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-5771

Epic Goal*

The goal is to split client certificate trust chains from the global Hypershift root CA.

 
Why is this important? (mandatory)

This is important to:

  • assure a workload can be run on any kind of OCP flavor
  • reduce the blast radius in case of a sensitive material leak
  • separate trust to allow more granular control over client certificate authentication

 
Scenarios (mandatory) 

Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

  1. I would like to be able to run my workloads on any OpenShift-like platform.
    My workloads allow components to authenticate using client certificates based
    on a trust bundle that I am able to retrieve from the cluster.
  1. I don't want my users to have access to any CA bundle that would allow them
    to trust a random certificate from the cluster for client certificate authentication.

 
Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

Hypershift team needs to provide us with code reviews and merge the changes we are to deliver

Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

  • Development - OpenShift Auth, Hypershift
  • Documentation -OpenShift Auth Docs team
  • QE - OpenShift Auth QE
  • PX - I have no idea what PX is
  • Others - others

Acceptance Criteria (optional)

The serviceaccount CA bundle automatically injected to all pods cannot be used to authenticate any client certificate generated by the control-plane.

Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

Risk: there is a throbbing time pressure as this should be delivered before first stable Hypershift release

Done - Checklist (mandatory)

  • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
  • Documentation - Content development is complete.
  • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
  • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
  • Engineering Stories Merged
  • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
  • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

We plan to build Ironic Container Images using RHEL9 as base image in OCP 4.12

This is required because the ironic components have abandoned support for CentOS Stream 8 and Python 3.6/3.7 upstream during the most recent development cycle that will produce the stable Zed release, in favor of CentOS Stream 9 and Python 3.8/3.9

More info on RHEL8 to RHEL9 transition in OCP can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N8KyDY7KmgUYA9EOtDDQolebz0qi3nhT20IOn4D-xS4

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a SRE, I want hypershift operator to expose a metric when hosted control plane is ready. 

This should allow SRE to tune (or silence) alerts occurring while the hosted control plane is spinning up. 

 

 

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem? 

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb  

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)   

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

Console should be using v1 version of the ConsolePlugin model rather then the old v1alpha1.

CONSOLE-3077 was updating this version, but did not made the cut for the 4.12 release. Based on discussion with Samuel Padgett we should be backporting to 4.12.

 

The risk should be minimal since we are only updating the model itself + validation + Readme

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3027. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When running the console in development mode per https://github.com/openshift/console#frontend-development, metrics do not load on the cluster overview, pods list page, pod details page (Metrics tab is missing), etc.

Samuel Padgett suspects the changes in https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/0bd839da219462ea585183de1c856fb60e9f96fb are related.

We cache images by filename, which works when downloading from the Internet as the filename always includes the CoreOS version.

However, when extracting an image from the release payload, it always has the same name. Therefore, we will never update it to a newer image even when running different versions of the installer.

A possible solution:

  1. Check that the cached ISO's checksum matches the RHCOS metadata.
  2. If it doesn't, extract the expected checksum from the release payload and compare that to the cached ISO's checksum.
  3. If it still doesn't match, extract the ISO from the release payload.

An alternative might be to set the name of the cache file to something different. It's not clear how we'd guarantee a match between the release payload we've been given and the ISO unless the name was based on the release payload (which eliminates some of the point of the cache, since ordinarily most release payloads will point to a small number of images).

User Story

As an OpenShift operator, i would like to be able to add labels to my MachineSets and nodes which contain unique values, while also using the cluster autoscaler's ability to balance similar node groups. Being able to specify additional labels through the ClusterAutoscaler CRD would allow me to do that.

Background

Something that has arisen during the investigation of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001027 is the notion that each CSI driver could create its own zone topology labels, and that they do not have to be consistent with the well known kubernetes label.

It is possible, although not entirely confirmed, that a CSI driver might add these labels even when not in use (although running in the cluster).

Additionally, users may need the option to specify more labels to ignore (as illustrated in the discussion of the bug).

Steps

  • Add a new API field for the labels to ignore
  • it should be a list
  • write some unit tests
  • update our balance node e2e test

Stakeholders

  • cloud team, qe

Definition of Done

  • field and functionality added
  • Docs
  • product docs will need an update
  • Testing
  • unit and e2e

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1557. The following is the description of the original issue:

Seen in an instance created recently by a 4.12.0-ec.2 GCP provider:

  "scheduling": {
    "automaticRestart": false,
    "onHostMaintenance": "MIGRATE",
    "preemptible": false,
    "provisioningModel": "STANDARD"
  },

From GCP's docs, they may stop instances on hardware failures and other causes, and we'd need automaticRestart: true to auto-recover from that. Also from GCP docs, the default for automaticRestart is true. And on the Go provider side, we doc:

If omitted, the platform chooses a default, which is subject to change over time, currently that default is "Always".

But the implementing code does not actually float the setting. Seems like a regression here, which is part of 4.10:

$ git clone https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-provider-gcp.git
$ cd machine-api-provider-gcp
$ git log --oneline origin/release-4.10 | grep 'migrate to openshift/api'
44f0f958 migrate to openshift/api

But that's not where the 4.9 and earlier code is located:

$ git branch -a | grep origin/release
  remotes/origin/release-4.10
  remotes/origin/release-4.11
  remotes/origin/release-4.12
  remotes/origin/release-4.13

Hunting for 4.9 code:

$ oc adm release info --commits quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.9.48-x86_64 | grep gcp
  gcp-machine-controllers                        https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-gcp                       c955c03b2d05e3b8eb0d39d5b4927128e6d1c6c6
  gcp-pd-csi-driver                              https://github.com/openshift/gcp-pd-csi-driver                              48d49f7f9ef96a7a42a789e3304ead53f266f475
  gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator                     https://github.com/openshift/gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator                     d8a891de5ae9cf552d7d012ebe61c2abd395386e

So looking there:

$ git clone https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-gcp.git
$ cd cluster-api-provider-gcp
$ git log --oneline | grep 'migrate to openshift/api'
...no hits...
$ git grep -i automaticRestart origin/release-4.9  | grep -v '"description"\|compute-gen.go'
origin/release-4.9:vendor/google.golang.org/api/compute/v1/compute-api.json:        "automaticRestart": {

Not actually clear to me how that code is structured. So 4.10 and later GCP machine-API providers are impacted, and I'm unclear on 4.9 and earlier.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2895. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Current validation will not accept Resource Groups or DiskEncryptionSets which have upper-case letters.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Attempt to create a cluster/machineset using a DiskEncryptionSet with an RG or Name with upper-case letters

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create cluster with DiskEncryptionSet with upper-case letters in DES name or in Resource Group name

Actual results:

See error message:

encountered error: [controlPlane.platform.azure.defaultMachinePlatform.osDisk.diskEncryptionSet.resourceGroup: Invalid value: \"v4-e2e-V62447568-eastus\": invalid resource group format, compute[0].platform.azure.defaultMachinePlatform.osDisk.diskEncryptionSet.resourceGroup: Invalid value: \"v4-e2e-V62447568-eastus\": invalid resource group format]

Expected results:

Create a cluster/machineset using the existing and valid DiskEncryptionSet

Additional info:

I have submitted a PR for this already, but it needs to be reviewed and backported to 4.11: https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6513

Description of problem:

This is just a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105570 for purposes of cherry-picking.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Grafana has been removed in 4.11 and we can safely remove any logic in CMO that deals with Grafana (except dashboards since they are used by OCP console).

Another point to clarify is to communicate to ProdSec and ART that Grafana isn't part of OCP anymore.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3032. The following is the description of the original issue:

If installation fails at an early stage (e.g. pulling release images, configuring hosts, waiting for agents to come up) there is no indication that anything has gone wrong, and the installer binary may not even be able to connect.
We should at least display what is happening on the console so that users have some avenue to figure out for themselves what is going on.

Description of problem:

when provisioningNetwork is changed from Disabled to Managed/Unmanaged, the ironic-proxy daemonset is not removed

This causes the metal3 pod to be stuck in pending, since both pods are trying to use port 6385 on the host:

0/3 nodes are available: 3 node(s) didn't have free ports for the requested pod ports. preemption: 0/3 nodes are available: 3 node(s) didn't have free ports for the requested pod ports

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12rc.4

How reproducible:

Every time for me

Steps to Reproduce:

1. On a multinode cluster, change the provisioningNetwork from Disabled to Unmanaged (I didn't try Managed)
2.
3.

Actual results:

0/3 nodes are available: 3 node(s) didn't have free ports for the requested pod ports. preemption: 0/3 nodes are available: 3 node(s) didn't have free ports for the requested pod ports

Expected results:

I believe the ironic-proxy daemonset should be deleted when the provisioningNetwork is set to Managed/Unmanaged

Additional info:

If I manually delete the ironic-proxy Daemonset, the controller does not re-create it.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7719. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

An update from 4.13.0-ec.2 to 4.13.0-ec.3 stuck on:

$ oc get clusteroperator machine-config
NAME             VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
machine-config   4.13.0-ec.2   True        True          True       30h     Unable to apply 4.13.0-ec.3: error during syncRequiredMachineConfigPools: [timed out waiting for the condition, error pool worker is not ready, retrying. Status: (pool degraded: true total: 105, ready 105, updated: 105, unavailable: 0)]

The worker MachineConfigPool status included:

Unable to find source-code formatter for language: node. Available languages are: actionscript, ada, applescript, bash, c, c#, c++, cpp, css, erlang, go, groovy, haskell, html, java, javascript, js, json, lua, none, nyan, objc, perl, php, python, r, rainbow, ruby, scala, sh, sql, swift, visualbasic, xml, yaml
      type: NodeDegraded
    - lastTransitionTime: "2023-02-16T14:29:21Z"
      message: 'Failed to render configuration for pool worker: Ignoring MC 99-worker-generated-containerruntime
        generated by older version 8276d9c1f574481043d3661a1ace1f36cd8c3b62 (my version:
        c06601510c0917a48912cc2dda095d8414cc5182)'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13.0-ec.3. The behavior was apparently introduced as part of OCPBUGS-6018, which has been backported, so the following update targets are expected to be vulnerable: 4.10.52+, 4.11.26+, 4.12.2+, and 4.13.0-ec.3.

How reproducible:

100%, when updating into a vulnerable release, if you happen to have leaked MachineConfig.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. 4.12.0-ec.1 dropped cleanUpDuplicatedMC. Run a later release, like 4.13.0-ec.2.
2. Create more than one KubeletConfig or ContainerRuntimeConfig targeting the worker pool (or any pool other than master). The number of clusters who have had redundant configuration objects like this is expected to be small.
3. (Optionally?) delete the extra KubeletConfig and ContainerRuntimeConfig.
4. Update to 4.13.0-ec.3.

Actual results:

Update sticks on the machine-config ClusterOperator, as described above.

Expected results:

Update completes without issues.

Description of problem:

oc --context build02 get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.12.0-ec.1   True        False         45h     Error while reconciling 4.12.0-ec.1: the cluster operator kube-controller-manager is degraded

oc --context build02 get co kube-controller-manager
NAME                      VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
kube-controller-manager   4.12.0-ec.1   True        False         True       2y87d   GarbageCollectorDegraded: error fetching rules: Get "https://thanos-querier.openshift-monitoring.svc:9091/api/v1/rules": dial tcp 172.30.153.28:9091: connect: cannot assign requested address

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

build02 is a build farm cluster in CI production.
I can provide credentials to access the cluster if needed.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3508. The following is the description of the original issue:

Exposed via the fact that the periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-ipv4 job is at 0% for at least the past two weeks over approximatesly 65 runs.

Testgrid shows that this job started failing in a very consistent way on Oct 25th at about 8am UTC: https://testgrid.k8s.io/redhat-openshift-ocp-release-4.12-informing#periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-ipv4

6 disruption tests fail, all with alarming consistency virtually always claiming exactly 8s of disruption, max allowed 1s.

And then openshift-tests.[sig-arch] events should not repeat pathologically fails with an odd signature:

{  6 events happened too frequently

event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-2 - reason/NodeHasNoDiskPressure roles/control-plane,master Node master-2 status is now: NodeHasNoDiskPressure
event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-2 - reason/NodeHasSufficientMemory roles/control-plane,master Node master-2 status is now: NodeHasSufficientMemory
event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-2 - reason/NodeHasSufficientPID roles/control-plane,master Node master-2 status is now: NodeHasSufficientPID
event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-1 - reason/NodeHasNoDiskPressure roles/control-plane,master Node master-1 status is now: NodeHasNoDiskPressure
event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-1 - reason/NodeHasSufficientMemory roles/control-plane,master Node master-1 status is now: NodeHasSufficientMemory
event happened 35 times, something is wrong: node/master-1 - reason/NodeHasSufficientPID roles/control-plane,master Node master-1 status is now: NodeHasSufficientPID}

The two types of tests started failing together exactly, and the disruption measurements are bizzarely consistent, every single time we see precisely 8s for kube-api, cache-kube-api, openshift-api, cache-openshift-api, oauth-api, cache-oauth-api. It's always these 6, and it seems to be always exactly 8 seconds. I cannot state enough how strange this is. It almost implies that something is happening on a very consistent schedule.

Occasionally these are accompanied by 1-2s of disruption for those backends with new connections, but sometimes not as well.

It looks like all of the disruption consistently happens within two very long tests:

4s within: [sig-network] services when running openshift ipv4 cluster ensures external ip policy is configured correctly on the cluster [Serial] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

4s within: [sig-network] services when running openshift ipv4 cluster on bare metal [apigroup:config.openshift.io] ensures external auto assign cidr is configured correctly on the cluster [Serial] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]

Both tests appear to have run prior to oct 25, so I don't think it's a matter of new tests breaking something or getting unskipped. Both tests also always pass, but appear to be impacting the cluster?

The master's going NotReady also appears to fall within the above two tests as well, though it does not seem to directly match with when we measure disruption, but bear in mind there's a 40s delay before the node goes NotReady.

Focusing on https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-ipv4/1590640492373086208 where the above are from:

Two of the three master nodes appear to be going NodeNotReady a couple times throughout the run, as visible in the spyglass chart under the node state row on the left. master-0 does not appear here, but it does exist. (I suspect it has leader and thus is the node reporting the others going not ready)

From the master-0 kubelet log in must-gather we can see one of these examples where it reports that master-2 has not checked in:

2022-11-10T10:38:35.874090961Z I1110 10:38:35.873975       1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:1137] node master-2 hasn't been updated for 40.00700561s. Last Ready is: &NodeCondition{Type:Ready,Status:True,LastHeartbeatTime:2022-11-10 1
0:36:10 +0000 UTC,LastTransitionTime:2022-11-10 10:29:11 +0000 UTC,Reason:KubeletReady,Message:kubelet is posting ready status,}
2022-11-10T10:38:35.874090961Z I1110 10:38:35.874056       1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:1137] node master-2 hasn't been updated for 40.007097549s. Last MemoryPressure is: &NodeCondition{Type:MemoryPressure,Status:False,LastHeartb
eatTime:2022-11-10 10:36:10 +0000 UTC,LastTransitionTime:2022-11-10 10:29:11 +0000 UTC,Reason:KubeletHasSufficientMemory,Message:kubelet has sufficient memory available,}
2022-11-10T10:38:35.874090961Z I1110 10:38:35.874067       1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:1137] node master-2 hasn't been updated for 40.007110285s. Last DiskPressure is: &NodeCondition{Type:DiskPressure,Status:False,LastHeartbeatT
ime:2022-11-10 10:36:10 +0000 UTC,LastTransitionTime:2022-11-10 10:29:11 +0000 UTC,Reason:KubeletHasNoDiskPressure,Message:kubelet has no disk pressure,}
2022-11-10T10:38:35.874090961Z I1110 10:38:35.874076       1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:1137] node master-2 hasn't been updated for 40.007119541s. Last PIDPressure is: &NodeCondition{Type:PIDPressure,Status:False,LastHeartbeatTim
e:2022-11-10 10:36:10 +0000 UTC,LastTransitionTime:2022-11-10 10:29:11 +0000 UTC,Reason:KubeletHasSufficientPID,Message:kubelet has sufficient PID available,}
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881749410Z I1110 10:38:35.881705       1 controller_utils.go:181] "Recording status change event message for node" status="NodeNotReady" node="master-2"
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881749410Z I1110 10:38:35.881733       1 controller_utils.go:120] "Update ready status of pods on node" node="master-2"
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881820988Z I1110 10:38:35.881799       1 controller_utils.go:138] "Updating ready status of pod to false" pod="metal3-b7b69fdbb-rfbdj"
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881893234Z I1110 10:38:35.881858       1 topologycache.go:179] Ignoring node master-2 because it has an excluded label
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881893234Z W1110 10:38:35.881886       1 topologycache.go:199] Can't get CPU or zone information for worker-0 node
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881903023Z I1110 10:38:35.881892       1 topologycache.go:215] Insufficient node info for topology hints (0 zones, %!s(int64=0) CPU, false)
2022-11-10T10:38:35.881932172Z I1110 10:38:35.881917       1 controller.go:271] Node changes detected, triggering a full node sync on all loadbalancer services
2022-11-10T10:38:35.882290428Z I1110 10:38:35.882270       1 event.go:294] "Event occurred" object="master-2" fieldPath="" kind="Node" apiVersion="v1" type="Normal" reason="NodeNotReady" message="Node master-2 status is now: NodeNotReady"

Now from master-2's kubelet log around that time, 40 seconds earlier puts us at 10:37:55, so we'd be looking for something odd around there.

A few potential lines:

Nov 10 10:37:55.232537 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:37:55.232495    1930 patch_prober.go:29] interesting pod/kube-controller-manager-guard-master-2 container/guard namespace/openshift-kube-controller-manager: Readiness probe status=failure output="Get \"https://192.168.111.22:10257/healthz\": dial tcp 192.168.111.22:10257: connect: connection refused" start-of-body=

Nov 10 10:37:55.232537 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:37:55.232549    1930 prober.go:114] "Probe failed" probeType="Readiness" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-guard-master-2" podUID=8be2c6c1-f8f6-4bf0-b26d-53ce487354bd containerName="guard" probeResult=failure output="Get \"https://192.168.111.22:10257/healthz\": dial tcp 192.168.111.22:10257: connect: connection refused"

Nov 10 10:38:12.238273 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: E1110 10:38:12.238229    1930 controller.go:187] failed to update lease, error: Put "https://api-int.ostest.test.metalkube.org:6443/apis/coordination.k8s.io/v1/namespaces/kube-node-lease/leases/master-2?timeout=10s": net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)

Nov 10 10:38:13.034109 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: E1110 10:38:13.034077    1930 kubelet_node_status.go:487] "Error updating node status, will retry" err="error getting node \"master-2\": Get \"https://api-int.ostest.test.metalkube.org:6443/api/v1/nodes/master-2?resourceVersion=0&timeout=10s\": net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)"

At 10:38:40 all kinds of master-2 watches time out with messages like:

Nov 10 10:38:40.244399 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: W1110 10:38:40.244272    1930 reflector.go:347] object-"openshift-oauth-apiserver"/"kube-root-ca.crt": watch of *v1.ConfigMap ended with: an error on the server ("unable to decode an event from the watch stream: http2: client connection lost") has prevented the request from succeeding

And then suddenly we're back online:

Nov 10 10:38:40.252149 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:40.252131    1930 kubelet_node_status.go:590] "Recording event message for node" node="master-2" event="NodeHasSufficientMemory"
Nov 10 10:38:40.252149 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:40.252156    1930 kubelet_node_status.go:590] "Recording event message for node" node="master-2" event="NodeHasNoDiskPressure"
Nov 10 10:38:40.252268 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:40.252165    1930 kubelet_node_status.go:590] "Recording event message for node" node="master-2" event="NodeHasSufficientPID"
Nov 10 10:38:40.252268 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:40.252177    1930 kubelet_node_status.go:590] "Recording event message for node" node="master-2" event="NodeReady"
Nov 10 10:38:47.904430 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:47.904373    1930 kubelet.go:2229] "SyncLoop (probe)" probe="readiness" status="" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-master-2"
Nov 10 10:38:47.904842 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:47.904662    1930 kubelet.go:2229] "SyncLoop (probe)" probe="startup" status="unhealthy" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-master-2"
Nov 10 10:38:47.907900 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:47.907872    1930 kubelet.go:2229] "SyncLoop (probe)" probe="startup" status="started" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-master-2"
Nov 10 10:38:48.431448 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:48.431414    1930 kubelet.go:2229] "SyncLoop (probe)" probe="readiness" status="ready" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-master-2"
Nov 10 10:38:54.764069 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764029    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-kube-scheduler/openshift-kube-scheduler-master-2" status=Running
Nov 10 10:38:54.764069 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764059    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-kni-infra/keepalived-master-2" status=Running
Nov 10 10:38:54.764069 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764077    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-kni-infra/coredns-master-2" status=Running
Nov 10 10:38:54.764069 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764086    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-kni-infra/haproxy-master-2" status=Running
Nov 10 10:38:54.764492 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764106    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-etcd/etcd-master-2" status=Running
Nov 10 10:38:54.764492 master-2 kubenswrapper[1930]: I1110 10:38:54.764113    1930 kubelet_getters.go:182] "Pod status updated" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-master-2" status=Running

Also curious:

Nov 10 10:37:50.318237 master-2 ovs-vswitchd[1324]: ovs|00251|connmgr|INFO|br0<->unix#468: 2 flow_mods in the last 0 s (2 deletes)
Nov 10 10:37:50.342965 master-2 ovs-vswitchd[1324]: ovs|00252|connmgr|INFO|br0<->unix#471: 4 flow_mods in the last 0 s (4 deletes)
Nov 10 10:37:50.364271 master-2 ovs-vswitchd[1324]: ovs|00253|bridge|INFO|bridge br0: deleted interface vethcb8d36e6 on port 41

Nov 10 10:37:53.579562 master-2 NetworkManager[1336]: <info>  [1668076673.5795] dhcp4 (enp2s0): state changed new lease, address=192.168.111.22

These look like they could be related to the tests these problems appear to coincide with?

Description of problem:

Currently we are not gathering Machine objects. We got nomination for a rule that will use this resource.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4168. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Prometheus continuously restarts due to slow WAL replay

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openshift - 4.11.13

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5346. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The vSphere status health item is misleading.

More info: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CUPJTHQ5P/p1672829660214369

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Have OCP 4.12 on vSphere
2. On the Cluster Dashboard (landing page), check the vSphere Status Health (static plugin)
3.

Actual results:

The icon shows pregress but nothing is progressing when the modal dialog is open

Expected results:

No misleading message and icon are rendered.

Additional info:

Since the Problem detector is not a reliable source and modification of the HealthItem in the OCP Console is too complex task for the recent state of release, a non-misleading text is good-enough.

This is a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 (OCPBUGSM-44070) to backport this issue.

Description of problem:
"Delete dependent objects of this resource" is a bit of confusing for some users because when creating the Application in Dev console not only the deployment but also IS, route, svc, secret objects will be created as well. When deleting the Application (in fact it is deployment), there is an option called "Delete dependent objects of this resource" and some users might think this means the IS, route, svc and any other objects which are created alongside with the deployment will be deleted as well

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create Application in Dev console
2. Delete the deployment
3. Check "Delete dependent objects of this resource"

Actual results:
Only deployment will be deleted and IS, svc, route will not be deleted

Expected results:
We either change the description of this option, or we really delete IS, svc, route and any other objects created under this Application.

Additional info:

Description of problem:
Follow-up of: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2988

This failure is perma-failing in the e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway jobs.

Example: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway/1597574181430497280
Search CI: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=when+using+openshift+ovn-kubernetes+should+ensure+egressfirewall+is+created&maxAge=336h&context=1&type=junit&name=e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job
Sippy: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/jobs/4.13/analysis?filters=%7B%22items%22%3A%5B%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22name%22%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22equals%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway%22%7D%5D%7D

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12,4.13

How reproducible:

Every time

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup dualstack KinD cluster
2. Create egress fw policy with spec
Spec:
  Egress:
    To:
      Cidr Selector:  0.0.0.0/0
    Type:             Deny
3. create a pod and ping to 1.1.1.1

Actual results:

Egress policy does not block flows to external IP

Expected results:

Egress policy blocks flows to external IP

Additional info:

It seems mixing ip4 and ip6 operands in ACL matchs doesnt work

Description of problem:

console.openshift.io/use-i18n false in v1alpha API is converted to "" in the v1 APi, which is not a valid value for the enum type declared in the code. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-25-071630

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Load a dynamic plugin with v1alpha API console.openshift.io/use-i18n set to 'false'
2. In the v1 API the {"spec":{"i18n":{"loadType":""}}} loadType is set to empty string, which is not a valid value defined here: https://github.com/jhadvig/api/blob/22d69793277ffeb618d642724515f249262959a5/console/v1/types_console_plugin.go#L46
https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1186/files# 

Actual results:

{"spec":{"i18n":{"loadType":""}}}

Expected results:

{"spec":{"i18n":{"loadType":"Lazy"}}}

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5466. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

It is possible to change some of the fields in default catalogSource specs and the Marketplace Operator will not revert the changes 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13.0 and back

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a 4.13.0 OpenShift cluster
2. Set the redhat-operator catalogSource.spec.grpcPodConfig.SecurityContextConfig field to `legacy`.

Actual results:

The field remains set to `legacy` mode.

Expected results:

The field is reverted to `restricted` mode.

Additional info:
This code needs to be updated to account for new fields in the catalogSource spec.

 

 

 

Both `[sig-devex][Feature:ImageEcosystem][mysql][Slow] openshift mysql image Creating from a template should instantiate the template [apigroup:apps.openshift.io]` and `[sig-devex][Feature:ImageEcosystem][mariadb][Slow] openshift mariadb image Creating from a template should instantiate the template [apigroup:image.openshift.io][apigroup:operator.openshift.io][apigroup:config.openshift.io][apigroup:apps.openshift.io]` are repeatedly failing over multiple PRs.

More links in https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27502#issuecomment-1304613482

Opening this issue to temporarily skip the broken tests to unblocking merging PRs in openshift/origin:master

More details in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3339

Description of problem:

When providing install-config as

platform:
 baremetal:
  apiVIP: 192.168.122.10
  ingressVIP: 192.168.122.11

agent installer fails with 
bin/openshift-install agent create cluster-manifests
FATAL failed to fetch Agent Manifests: failed to load asset "Install Config": invalid install-config configuration: [Platform.Baremetal.ApiVips: Required value: apiVips must be set for baremetal platform, Platform.Baremetal.IngressVips: Required value: ingressVips must be set for baremetal platform]
 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Git clone latest installer https://github.com/openshift/installer and build it
2. Provide install-config.yaml for baremetal platform with deprecated apiVip and ingressVip set
3. Create agent image with "bin/openshift-install agent create cluster-manifests"

Actual results:

bin/openshift-install agent create cluster-manifests
FATAL failed to fetch Agent Manifests: failed to load asset "Install Config": invalid install-config configuration: [Platform.Baremetal.ApiVips: Required value: apiVips must be set for baremetal platform, Platform.Baremetal.IngressVips: Required value: ingressVips must be set for baremetal platform]

Expected results:

agent installer should upconvert the depreacted fields and should not error. apiVip, ingressVip should be upconverted into apiVips and ingressVips respectively

Additional info:

 

If the status for the hosts in assisted-installer changes from preparing-for-installation to ready, that means that it failed to generate the ignition configs needed to install, and installation will not proceed. When we see this we should report a failure immediately from agent wait-for bootstrap-complete. Currently we just time out some time after reporting this log message:

level=info msg=Host master-2.ostest.test.metalkube.org: updated status from preparing-for-installation to known (Host is ready to be installed) 

To catch the case where the user runs the command after this failure has already happened, perhaps we should institute a relatively short timeout for installation to begin after all of the hosts are in the known state.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5136. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Provisioning on ilo4-virtualmedia BMC driver fails with error: "Creating vfat image failed: Unexpected error while running command"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13 (but will apply to older OpenShift versions too)

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.configure some nodes with ilo4-virtualmedia://
2.attempt provisioning
3.

Actual results:

provisioning fails with error similar to  Failed to inspect hardware. Reason: unable to start inspection: Validation of image href https://10.1.235.67:6183/ilo/boot-9db13f93-861a-4d27-b20d-2c228559faa2.iso failed, reason: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='10.1.235.67', port=6183): Max retries exceeded with url: /ilo/boot-9db13f93-861a-4d27-b20d-2c228559faa2.iso (Caused by SSLError(SSLCertVerificationError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: self-signed certificate in certificate chain (_ssl.c:1129)')))

Expected results:

Provisioning succeeds

Additional info:

This happens after a preceding issue with missing iLO driver configuration has been fixed (https://github.com/metal3-io/ironic-image/pull/402)

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4874. The following is the description of the original issue:

OCPBUGS-3278 is supposed to fix the issue where the user was required to provide data about the baremetal hosts (including MAC addresses) in the install-config, even though this data is ignored.

However, we determine whether we should disable the validation by checking the second CLI arg to see if it is agent.

This works when the command is:

openshift-install agent create image --dir=whatever

But fails when the argument is e.g., as in dev-scripts:

openshift-install --log-level=debug --dir=whatever agent create image

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2100181](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100181). The following is the description of the original bug:

Created attachment 1891950
log

Description of problem:

Prior to OCP 4.7.48, the configure-ovs script picked the corrected bonded interface for br-ex. In OCP 4.7.48 we have that is consistently fail. It picks one of the slave interfaces (ens3f0).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP Release > OCP 4.7.37

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy an OCP cluster with bonding
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

configure-ovs should not fail and assign the correct interface to br-ex (bond1)

Additional info:

There appears to be a new default NM profile from 4.7.37 to 4.7.38 a that was not there before

Description of problem: As discovered in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2795, gophercloud fails to list swift containers when the endpoint speaks HTTP2. This means that CIRO will provision a 100GB cinder volume even though swift is available to the tenant.

We're for example seeing this behavior in our CI on vexxhost.

The gophercloud commit that fixed this issue is https://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/commit/b7d5b2cdd7ffc13e79d924f61571b0e5f74ec91c, specifically the `|| ct == ""` part on line 75 of openstack/objectstorage/v1/containers/results.go. This commit made it in gophercloud v0.18.0.

CIRO still depends on gophercloud v0.17.0. We should bump gophercloud to fix the bug.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

All versions. Fix should go to 4.8 - 4.12.

How reproducible:

Always, when swift speaks HTTP2.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


Description of problem:

Each LB created for a Service type LoadBalancer results in 1 client rule and <# of public subnets> health rules being created.  The rules per SG quota in AWS is quite small; 60 by default, and 200 hard max.  OCP has about 40 rules OOTB. Assuming an HA cluster in 3 AZs, that is 4 rules per LB.  With default AWS quota, only ~5 LBs can be create and with the hard max of 200, only ~40 LBs can be created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.  Create Service type LoadBalancer and observe increase in master-sg and worker-sg rules sets
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 rules are created

Expected results:

1 rules is created when the client rule is a superset of the per-subnet health rules

Additional info:

This ~4x the number of Services of type LoadBalancer.  This is required for Hypershift.

AWS CPMS changes made here causes the single node clusters to fail installation
https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6172

 

Need to fix the issue by checking and not creating the CPMS manifest if the installation type is single node.

Description of problem:

The icon color of Alerts in the Topology list view should be based on alert type.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create a deployment
2. Create a resource quota so that quota alert will be visible in topology list page
3. navigate to topology list page
3.

Actual results:

Alert icon color is black and white. See the screenshots

Expected results:

Alert icon color should be base on alert type. 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

For some reason, some of the packets on a DNS conversation to the {{openshift-dns/dns-default}} service cluster IP don't get properly denatted, i.e. the reply packet has the pod IP as source IP instead of the service IP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.25

How reproducible:

Sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Try to resolve DNS with cluster DNS

Actual results:

DNS timeout. Reply packets have the pod IP instead of the service IP the request was sent to.

Expected results:

DNS working.

Additional info:

I'll elaborate about this in the attachments, but I could find nothing wrong in nbdb or any OVN-Kubernetes or OVN logs that rang a bell.
The only interesting thing I could see was that `conntrack -L` had no reference to this conversation, so it makes kind of sense that the reply packet address is not translated back to the service IP one, but I have not been able to find the reason of this.
The query/response packets can be correlated via DNS transaction ID.

Description of problem:

When a pod runs to a completed state, we typically rely on the update event that will indicate to us that this pod is completed. At that point the pod IP is released and the port configuration is removed in OVN. The subsequent delete event for this pod will be ignored because it should have been cleaned up in the previous update.

However, there can be cases where the update event is missed with pod completed. In this case we will only receive a delete with pod completed event, and ignore tearing down the pod. The end result is the pod is not cleaned up in OVN and the IP address remains allocated, reducing the amount of address range available to launch another pod. This can lead to exhausting all IP addresses available for pod allocation on a node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.24

How reproducible:

Not sure how to reproduce this. I'm guessing some lag in kapi updates can cause the completed update event and the final delete event to be combined into a single event.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Port still exists in OVN, IP remains allocated for a deleted pod.

Expected results:

IP should be freed, port should be removed from OVN.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:
OpenShift installer hits error when missing a topology section inside of a failureDomain like this in install-config.yaml:

    - name: us-east-1
      region: us-east
      zone: us-east-1a
    - name: us-east-2
      region: us-east
      zone: us-east-2a
      topology:
        computeCluster: /IBMCloud/host/vcs-mdcnc-workload-2
        networks:
        - ci-segment-154
        datastore: workload_share_vcsmdcncworkload2_vyC6a

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Build from latest master (4.12)

How reproducible:

Each time

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create install-config.yaml for vsphere multi-zone
2. Leave out a topology section (under failureDomains)
3. Attempt to create cluster

Actual results:

FATAL failed to fetch Terraform Variables: failed to fetch dependency of "Terraform Variables": failed to generate asset "Platform Provisioning Check": platform.vsphere.failureDomains.topology.resourcePool: Invalid value: "//Resources": resource pool '//Resources' not found 

Expected results:

Validation of topology before attempting to create any resources

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3228. The following is the description of the original issue:

While starting a Pipelinerun using UI, and in the process of providing the values on "Start Pipeline" , the IBM Power Customer (Deepak Shetty from IBM) has tried creating credentials under "Advanced options" with "Image Registry Credentials" (Authenticaion type). When the IBM Customer verified the credentials from  Secrets tab (in Workloads) , the secret was found in broken state. Screenshot of the broken secret is attached. 

The issue has been observed on OCP4.8, OCP4.9 and OCP4.10.

Description of problem:

TestUnmanagedDNSToManagedDNSInternalIngressController E2E test is failing on the error:
{
unmanaged_dns_test.go:272: failed to verify connectivity with workload with reqURL http://10.0.128.7 using external client: timed out waiting for the condition  

How reproducible:

About 75% of the time.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

75%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Run CI E2E tests on cluster-ingress-operator or 
make test-e2e TEST=TestUnmanagedDNSToManagedDNSInternalIngressController 

Actual results:

E2E test fails about 75% of the time

Expected results:

E2E should always pass

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

openshift-install does not detect releaseImage mismatches between cluster-image-set.yaml and registries.conf

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create ZTP inputs for image generation where registries.conf does not have any source matching the binary releaseimage (the binary image which can be obtained by running "openshift-install version". You can also set this value in ZTP manifest cluster-image-set.yaml 
2.run openshift-install agent create image

Actual results:

Image is generated with no warnings

Expected results:

Image is generated with warning message - "The ImageContentSources configuration in install-config.yaml should have at-least one source field matching the releaseImage value %s", releaseImagePath

 

Additional info:

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8702. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8523. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Due to rpm-ostree regression (OKD-63) MCO was copying /var/lib/kubelet/config.json into /run/ostree/auth.json on FCOS and SCOS. This breaks Assisted Installer flow, which starts with Live ISO and doesn't have /var/lib/kubelet/config.json

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


As a developer, I would like to remove the random terraform provider because it is essentially unnecessary and would improve our build process.

 

The random Terraform provider is used in Azure & Azure Stack to create a random string. This could easily be done in go code and passed in as a variable. 

Removing an extra provider would decrease our build time and improve our build stability, which is often failing due to timeouts. 

 

The random string is used here in Azure (and similarly in Azure Stack):

https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/data/data/azure/vnet/main.tf#L23-L27

 

One approach would be to generate the string in tfvars and pass it in as a terraform variable.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1805. The following is the description of the original issue:

The vSphere CSI cloud.conf lists the single datacenter from platform workspace config but in a multi-zone setup (https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/918 ) there may be more than the one datacenter.

This issue is resulting in PVs failing to attach because the virtual machines can't be find in any other datacenter. For example:

0s Warning FailedAttachVolume pod/image-registry-85b5d5db54-m78vp AttachVolume.Attach failed for volume "pvc-ab1a0611-cb3b-418d-bb3b-1e7bbe2a69ed" : rpc error: code = Internal desc = failed to find VirtualMachine for node:"rbost-zonal-ghxp2-worker-3-xm7gw". Error: virtual machine wasn't found  

The machine above lives in datacenter-2 but the CSI cloud.conf is only aware of the datacenter IBMCloud.

$ oc get cm vsphere-csi-config -o yaml  -n openshift-cluster-csi-drivers | grep datacenters
    datacenters = "IBMCloud" 

 

Description of the problem:

During install, we assume all PVs on a host have been added to a volume group and only remove them if they are. This could let other PVs that are not attached to volume groups persist and prevent coreos from installing properly. 

Relevant assisted installer links:

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/blob/9bec593930995220a2a4550b067f5a186de3b042/src/installer/installer.go#L809 

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/blob/9bec593930995220a2a4550b067f5a186de3b042/src/ops/ops.go#L414

 

Found while investigating triage issue https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-4017 

See slack thread for more details https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C02CP89N4VC/p1663263128420489 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Create a host with a PV w/o a volume group

2. Add host to cluster and install 

3. Observe the install fail

Actual results:

Installation fails with 

"Error: checking for exclusive access to /dev/sda 
Caused by:
| 0: couldn't reread partition table: device is in use |
| 1: EBUSY: Device or resource busy" 

Expected results:

All PVs and VGs are removed so that the installation will succeed

Description of problem:

egressip healthcheck through GRPC on dualstack cluster only uses v6 address when it trying to re-connect to egressIP node

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-04-081353

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. on dualstack OVN cluster, label one node to be egressip assignable
2. check leader ovnkube-master pod's log for egressip health check messages
3. set iptable to drop tcp port 9107 on the egress node, check leader ovnkube-master pod's log again

$  oc -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes logs ovnkube-master-s8gl4  -c ovnkube-master | grep health
I1004 17:10:13.752545       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to master-01.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:13.754308       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to master-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.128.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:13.757856       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:13.760742       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-02.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.131.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:13.763491       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to master-02.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.130.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:13.766653       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-01.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.128.2.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749573       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749624       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-01.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.128.2.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749635       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with master-01.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749645       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with master-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.128.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749654       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-02.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.131.0.2:9107)
I1004 17:10:18.749663       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with master-02.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.130.0.2:9107)
I1004 18:21:13.753154       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
I1004 18:21:19.749592       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
W1004 18:21:24.750727       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:29.750396       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:34.749900       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:39.750830       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:44.750599       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:49.750640       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:54.749998       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:21:59.750512       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:04.749911       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:09.750500       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:14.750400       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:19.750448       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:24.749497       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:22:29.750366       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
I1004 18:24:03.020413       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
I1004 18:24:09.750273       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
W1004 18:24:14.749580       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:19.750138       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:24.750291       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:29.750526       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:34.750725       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:39.750496       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:44.750182       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:49.750172       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:54.749791       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:24:59.749548       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:25:04.750806       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:25:09.750666       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:25:14.750602       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:25:19.750717       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
I1004 18:28:58.561054       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
I1004 18:29:04.749940       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:177] Closing connection with worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com (10.129.2.2:9107)
W1004 18:29:09.749710       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
W1004 18:29:14.749689       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:164] Could not connect to worker-00.jechen-1004d.qe.devcluster.openshift.com ([fd01:0:0:6::2]:9107): context deadline exceeded
 

Actual results:

uses v6 mgmtIP address to try to reconnect

Expected results:

Should use both v4 and v6 address to try to reconnect

Additional info:

 

 

Description of problem:

Seems ART is having trouble building OLM images: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/CB95J6R4N/p1676531421724929

I've already fixed master: 
* https://github.com/openshift/cluster-policy-controller/pull/103
* https://github.com/openshift/cluster-policy-controller/pull/101

Need a bug to backport...

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Tracker bug for bootimage bump in 4.12. This bug should block bugs which need a bootimage bump to fix.

Description of problem:

The reconciler removes the overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io resources whether the pod is alive or not. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create pods and check the overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io resources:

$ oc get overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io -A
NAMESPACE          NAME                      AGE
openshift-multus   2001-1b70-820d-4b04--13   4m53s
openshift-multus   2001-1b70-820d-4b05--13   4m49s

2.  Verify that when the ip-reconciler cronjob removes the overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io resources when run:

$ oc get cronjob -n openshift-multus
NAME            SCHEDULE       SUSPEND   ACTIVE   LAST SCHEDULE   AGE
ip-reconciler   */15 * * * *   False     0        14m             4d13h

$ oc get overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io -A
No resources found

$ oc get cronjob -n openshift-multus
NAME            SCHEDULE       SUSPEND   ACTIVE   LAST SCHEDULE   AGE
ip-reconciler   */15 * * * *   False     0        5s              4d13h

 

Actual results:

The overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io resources are removed for each created pod by the ip-reconciler cronjob.
The "overlapping ranges" are not used. 

Expected results:

The overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io should not be removed regardless of if a pod has used an IP in the overlapping ranges.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem: upon attempting to install OCP 4.10 UPI on baremetal ppc64le, the openshift-install gather command returns `panic: unsupported platform "none"`

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10.16

openshift-install 4.10.24 

How reproducible:

easily

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create install config
2. create manifests
3. create ignition configs

4. openshift-install gather bootstrap --log-level "debug"

Actual results:

DEBUG OpenShift Installer 4.10.24                  
DEBUG Built from commit d63a12ba0ec33d492093a8fc0e268a01a075f5da 
DEBUG Fetching Bootstrap SSH Key Pair...           
DEBUG Loading Bootstrap SSH Key Pair...            
DEBUG Using Bootstrap SSH Key Pair loaded from state file 
DEBUG Reusing previously-fetched Bootstrap SSH Key Pair 
DEBUG Fetching Install Config...                   
DEBUG Loading Install Config...                    
DEBUG   Loading SSH Key...                         
DEBUG   Loading Base Domain...                     
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Cluster Name...                    
DEBUG     Loading Base Domain...                   
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Networking...                      
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Pull Secret...                     
DEBUG   Loading Platform...                        
DEBUG Loading Install Config from both state file and target directory 
DEBUG On-disk Install Config matches asset in state file 
DEBUG Using Install Config loaded from state file  
DEBUG Reusing previously-fetched Install Config    
panic: unsupported platform "none"

goroutine 1 [running]:
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/terraform/stages/platform.StagesForPlatform({0x146f2d0a, 0x1619aa08})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/terraform/stages/platform/stages.go:55 +0x2ff
main.runGatherBootstrapCmd({0x14d8e028, 0x1})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/gather.go:115 +0x2d6
main.newGatherBootstrapCmd.func1(0xc001364500, {0xc0005a0b40, 0x2, 0x2})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/gather.go:65 +0x59
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc001364500, {0xc0005a0b20, 0x2, 0x2})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:860 +0x5f8
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc001334c80)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:974 +0x3bc
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:902
main.installerMain()
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/main.go:72 +0x29e
main.main()
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/main.go:50 +0x125

Expected results:

I'm not really sure what I expected to happen.  I've never used that gather before..

I would assume at least no panicking.

Additional info:

Description of problem:
When the user runs:

openshift-install agent create image --dir cluster-manifests

But the manifests are either not in cluster-manifests or are missing, the error code generated by the tool leads users to believe that they are missing some tool dependency:

ERROR failed to write asset (Agent Installer ISO) to disk: image reader not available

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):4.11.0

How reproducible: 100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rm -fr /tmp/cluster-manifests && mkdir /tmp/cluster-manifests
2.openshift-install agent create image --dir cluster-manifests

Actual results:
ERROR failed to write asset (Agent Installer ISO) to disk: image reader not available

Expected results:
Error: Missing manifets in the specified cluster manifest directory: "/tmp/cluster-manifests"

Additional info:

Description of problem:

If using ingresscontroller.spec.routeSelector.matchExpressions or ingresscontroller.spec.namespaceSelector.matchExpressions, the route will not count in the new route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard prometheus metric.

This is due to the logic only using "matchLabels". The logic needs to be updated to also use "matchExpressions".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create IC with matchExpressions:
oc apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: operator.openshift.io/v1
kind: IngressController
metadata:
  name: sharded
  namespace: openshift-ingress-operator
spec:
  domain: reproducer.$domain
  routeSelector:
    matchExpressions:
    - key: type
      operator: In
      values:
      - shard
  replicas: 1
  nodePlacement:
    nodeSelector:
      matchLabels:
        node-role.kubernetes.io/worker: ""
EOF

2. Create the route:
oc apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: route.openshift.io/v1
kind: Route
metadata:
  name: route-shard
  labels:
    type: shard
spec:
  to:
    kind: Service
    name: router-shard
EOF

 3. Check route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard{name="sharded"} in prometheus, it's 0 

Actual results:

route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard{name="sharded"} has 0 routes

Expected results:

route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard{name="sharded"} should have 1 route

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Container networking pods cannot access the host network pods on another node which caused some operators DEGRADED

$ oc get co
NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       True          True       63m     OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.jhou.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/healthz": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)...
baremetal                                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      68m     
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      78m     
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m     
console                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       False         False      30m     RouteHealthAvailable: failed to GET route (https://console-openshift-console.apps.jhou.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com): Get "https://console-openshift-console.apps.jhou.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       True          True       13m     EtcdMembersAvailable: 1 of 2 members are available, openshift-qe-048.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com is unhealthy
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      39m     
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         True       47m     The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: CanaryChecksSucceeding=False (CanaryChecksRepetitiveFailures: Canary route checks for the default ingress controller are failing)
insights                                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      56m     
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      50m     
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         True       60m     GarbageCollectorDegraded: error querying alerts: client_error: client error: 403
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      54m     
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m     
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      51m     
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
machine-config                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      29m     
marketplace                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
monitoring                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      38m     
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      30m     
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      56m     
openshift-samples                          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      43m     
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      43m     
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m     
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m


$ oc get pod -n openshift-ingress -o wide
NAME                              READY   STATUS    RESTARTS      AGE   IP                                  NODE                                       NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
router-default-58f6498646-gf6ns   1/1     Running   1 (79m ago)   93m   2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:5abc   openshift-qe-049.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
router-default-58f6498646-qjtbk   1/1     Running   1 (79m ago)   93m   2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:593c   openshift-qe-052.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>


$ oc get pod -n openshift-network-diagnostics -o wide
NAME                                    READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE    IP              NODE                                       NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
network-check-source-5f967d78bc-cfwz4   1/1     Running   0          103m   fd01:0:0:3::9   openshift-qe-052.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-52krv              1/1     Running   0          91m    fd01:0:0:4::3   openshift-qe-049.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-56q9q              1/1     Running   0          91m    fd01:0:0:3::5   openshift-qe-052.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-ggqsf              1/1     Running   0          103m   fd01:0:0:2::4   openshift-qe-048.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-xfrq4              1/1     Running   0          103m   fd01:0:0:1::3   openshift-qe-047.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-zrglr              1/1     Running   0          73m    fd01:0:0:6::4   openshift-qe-051.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-zwb4t              1/1     Running   0          91m    fd01:0:0:5::5   openshift-qe-053.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>

####Failed from containers pod on openshift-qe-053.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com to access ingress pods

$ oc rsh -n openshift-network-diagnostics network-check-target-zwb4t
sh-4.4$ curl https://[2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:5abc]:443 -k -I
^C
sh-4.4$ curl https://[2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:593c]:443 -k -I
^C

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy ipv6 disconnect single cluster
2. 
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Insights operator gathers related clusteroperator's related objects from operators.openshift.io group. Ingresscontrollers are now missing, because it's a namespaceed resource and the "default" name is not provided in the related objects of the ingress clusteroperator

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Setting up Github App from the console is lacking the required permission 
Events and Permissions: https://pipelinesascode.com/docs/install/github_apps/

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup Github App from administrator perspective.
2. Create Repository and configure it to use the Github App method.

Actual results:
Creates Github App with limited permission.

Expected results:
Created Github App should contain all the required permission and should trigger the pipelinerun successfully on git events.

Additional info:

Console needs to update the default_events and default_permissions here it has to be matching with the CLI - refer this.

we need to update the  See Github permission section in the UI as well.

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2988. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

openshift-apiserver, openshift-oauth-apiserver and kube-apiserver pods cannot validate the certificate when trying to reach etcd reporting certificate validation errors:

}. Err: connection error: desc = "transport: authentication handshake failed: x509: certificate is valid for ::1, 127.0.0.1, ::1, fd69::2, not 2620:52:0:198::10"
W1018 11:36:43.523673      15 logging.go:59] [core] [Channel #186 SubChannel #187] grpc: addrConn.createTransport failed to connect to {
  "Addr": "[2620:52:0:198::10]:2379",
  "ServerName": "2620:52:0:198::10",
  "Attributes": null,
  "BalancerAttributes": null,
  "Type": 0,
  "Metadata": null
}. Err: connection error: desc = "transport: authentication handshake failed: x509: certificate is valid for ::1, 127.0.0.1, ::1, fd69::2, not 2620:52:0:198::10"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with single stack IPv6 via ZTP procedure

Actual results:

Deployment times out and some of the operators aren't deployed successfully.

NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   False       False         True       124m    APIServerDeploymentAvailable: no apiserver.openshift-oauth-apiserver pods available on any node....
baremetal                                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      112m    
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      115m    
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
console                                                                                                                      
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         True       121m    ClusterMemberControllerDegraded: could not get list of unhealthy members: giving up getting a cached client after 3 tries
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   False       True          True       104m    Available: The registry is removed...
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        True          True       111m    The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: DeploymentReplicasAllAvailable=False (DeploymentReplicasNotAvailable: 0/1 of replicas are available)
insights                                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      118s    
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      102m    
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         True       107m    GarbageCollectorDegraded: error fetching rules: Get "https://thanos-querier.openshift-monitoring.svc:9091/api/v1/rules": dial tcp [fd02::3c5f]:9091: connect: connection refused
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      107m    
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      117m    
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
machine-config                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      115m    
marketplace                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      116m    
monitoring                                                                      False       True          True       98m     deleting Thanos Ruler Route failed: Timeout: request did not complete within requested timeout - context deadline exceeded, deleting UserWorkload federate Route failed: Timeout: request did not complete within requested timeout - context deadline exceeded, reconciling Alertmanager Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io alertmanager-main), reconciling Thanos Querier Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io thanos-querier), reconciling Prometheus API Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io prometheus-k8s), prometheuses.monitoring.coreos.com "k8s" not found
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      104m    
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      107m    
openshift-samples                                                               False       True          False      103m    The error the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get imagestreams.image.openshift.io) during openshift namespace cleanup has left the samples in an unknown state
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      106m    
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m  

Expected results:

Deployment succeeds without issues.

Additional info:

I was unable to run must-gather so attaching the pods logs copied from the host file system.

Description of the problem:

In case we are installing a cluster using the kubeapi the installer fails to send the logs due to a missing volume mount of the caCert

 

time="2022-07-06T08:25:59Z" level=info msg="failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- podman run --rm --privileged --net=host --pid=host -v /run/systemd/journal/socket:/run/systemd/journal/socket -v /var/log:/var/log quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent@sha256:20d9e31e37f881fcd34aed44b2ee9f143382f87cbf4b634325d2260f8dffe6c2 logs_sender -cluster-id 4d4be932-42a8-4d37-b5d2-41f42a487821 -url https://assisted-service-assisted-installer.apps.ostest.test.metalkube.org -host-id 17babad0-f2d0-419f-a69b-8c6895df26f4 -infra-env-id 37c26d69-6416-4888-bd2e-aec610f241b3 -pull-secret-token <SECRET> -insecure=false -bootstrap=true -cacert=/etc/assisted-service/service-ca-cert.crt], env vars [PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin TERM=xterm container=oci http_proxy= https_proxy= NO_PROXY= OPENSHIFT_BUILD_NAME=assisted-installer PULL_SECRET_TOKEN=<SECRET> no_proxy= HTTP_PROXY= HTTPS_PROXY= OPENSHIFT_BUILD_NAMESPACE=ci-op-8wiv6td6 BUILD_LOGLEVEL=0 HOME=/root HOSTNAME=extraworker-0], error exit status 1, waitStatus 1, Output \"time=\"06-07-2022 08:25:59\" level=fatal msg=\"Failed to initialize connection: &{%!e(string=open) %!e(string=/etc/assisted-service/service-ca-cert.crt) %!e(syscall.Errno=2)}\" file=\"send_logs.go:92\"\ntime=\"2022-07-06T08:25:59Z\" level=warning msg=\"lstat /sys/fs/cgroup/devices/machine.slice/libpod-8b070b62a9482fc0add228b77844b2c4e0a614e2b171ca87f76f56a4305a6ee7.scope: no such file or directory\"\""
time="2022-07-06T08:25:59Z" level=error msg="upload installation logs failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- podman run --rm --privileged --net=host --pid=host -v /run/systemd/journal/socket:/run/systemd/journal/socket -v /var/log:/var/log quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent@sha256:20d9e31e37f881fcd34aed44b2ee9f143382f87cbf4b634325d2260f8dffe6c2 logs_sender -cluster-id 4d4be932-42a8-4d37-b5d2-41f42a487821 -url https://assisted-service-assisted-installer.apps.ostest.test.metalkube.org -host-id 17babad0-f2d0-419f-a69b-8c6895df26f4 -infra-env-id 37c26d69-6416-4888-bd2e-aec610f241b3 -pull-secret-token <SECRET> -insecure=false -bootstrap=true -cacert=/etc/assisted-service/service-ca-cert.crt], Error exit status 1, LastOutput \"... :92\"\ntime=\"2022-07-06T08:25:59Z\" level=warning msg=\"lstat /sys/fs/cgroup/devices/machine.slice/libpod-8b070b62a9482fc0add228b77844b2c4e0a614e2b171ca87f76f56a4305a6ee7.scope: no such file or directory\"\"" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster using the kubeapi

2. look for the host logs after the host reboots or the installation complete

3.

Actual results:

no host logs

Expected results:
...

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3214. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The installer has logic that avoids adding the router CAs to the kubeconfig if the console is not available.  It's not clear why it does this, but it means that the router CAs don't get added when the console is deliberately disabled (it is now an optional capability in 4.12).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Seen in 4.12+4.13

How reproducible:

Always, when starting a cluster w/o the Console capability

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Edit the install-config to set:
capabilities:
  baselineCapabilitySet: None
2. install the cluster
3. check the CAs in the kubeconfig, the wildcard route CA will be missing (compare it w/ a normal cluster)

Actual results:

router CAs missing

Expected results:

router CAs should be present

Additional info:

This needs to be backported to 4.12.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2479. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Right border radius is 0 for the pipeline visualization wrapper in dark mode but looks fine in light mode

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Switch the theme to dark mode
2. Create a pipeline and navigate to the Pipeline details page

Actual results:

Right border radius is 0, see the screenshots

Expected results:

Right border radius should be same as left border radius.

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1428. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When using an OperatorGroup attached to a service account, AND if there is a secret present in the namespace, the operator installation will fail with the message:
the service account does not have any API secret sa=testx-ns/testx-sa
This issue seems similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094303 - which was resolved in 4.11.0 - however, the new element now, is that the presence of a secret in the namespace  is causing the issue.
The name of the secret seems significant - suggesting something somewhere is depending on the order that secrets are listed in. For example, If the secret in the namespace is called "asecret", the problem does not occur. If it is called "zsecret", the problem always occurs.
"zsecret" is not a "kubernetes.io/service-account-token". The issue I have raised here relates to Opaque secrets - zsecret is an Opaque secret. The issue may apply to other types of secrets, but specifically my issue is that when there is an opaque secret present in the namespace, the operator install fails as described. I aught to be allowed to have an opaque secret present in the namespace where I am installing the operator.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0 & 4.11.1

How reproducible:

100% reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create namespace: oc new-project testx-ns
2. oc apply -f api-secret-issue.yaml

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

API YAML:

cat api-secret-issue.yaml 
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
  name: zsecret
  namespace: testx-ns
  annotations:
   kubernetes.io/service-account.name: testx-sa
type: Opaque
stringData:
  mykey: mypass

apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
  name: testx-sa
  namespace: testx-ns

kind: OperatorGroup
apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1
metadata:
  name: testx-og
  namespace: testx-ns
spec:
  serviceAccountName: "testx-sa"
  targetNamespaces:
  - testx-ns

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
  name: testx-role
  namespace: testx-ns
rules:

  • apiGroups: ["*"]
      resources: ["*"]
      verbs: ["*"] 
      

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  name: testx-rolebinding
  namespace: testx-ns
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: Role
  name: testx-role
subjects:

  • kind: ServiceAccount
      name: testx-sa
      namespace: testx-ns

apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: Subscription
metadata:
  name: etcd-operator
  namespace: testx-ns
spec:
  channel: singlenamespace-alpha
  installPlanApproval: Automatic
  name: etcd
  source: community-operators
  sourceNamespace: openshift-marketplace

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3713. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is essentially the same issue in OCPBUGS-3668 where we found the username must be fully qualified (e.g. "rbost@vsphere.local" not just "rbost").

Description of problem:

Seeing intermittently during cluster installs

Network operator stuck in Progressing with 

network                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451   True        True          False      117m    DaemonSet "/openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target" is not available (awaiting 1 nodes)


MG: http://shell.lab.bos.redhat.com/~anusaxen/must-gather.local.5450303633101217331/

iptables-save on master-2 node - http://shell.lab.bos.redhat.com/~anusaxen/iptables-save


pod events
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age                   From               Message
  ----     ------                  ----                  ----               -------
  Normal   Scheduled               129m                  default-scheduler  Successfully assigned openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target-gnld6 to qe-anurag114e-9xkz4-master-2.c.openshift-qe.internal
  Warning  FailedMount             128m (x7 over 129m)   kubelet            MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "kube-api-access-kfg5s" : [object "openshift-network-diagnostics"/"kube-root-ca.crt" not registered, object "openshift-network-diagnostics"/"openshift-service-ca.crt" not registered]
  Warning  NetworkNotReady         128m (x18 over 129m)  kubelet            network is not ready: container runtime network not ready: NetworkReady=false reason:NetworkPluginNotReady message:Network plugin returns error: No CNI configuration file in /etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/. Has your network provider started?
  Warning  ErrorAddingLogicalPort  127m (x2 over 127m)   controlplane       addLogicalPort failed for openshift-network-diagnostics/network-check-target-gnld6: unable to parse node L3 gw annotation: k8s.ovn.org/l3-gateway-config annotation not found for node "qe-anurag114e-9xkz4-master-2.c.openshift-qe.internal"
  Normal   AddedInterface          127m                  multus             Add eth0 [10.130.0.3/23] from ovn-kubernetes
  Warning  ProbeError              9m (x16 over 71m)     kubelet            Readiness probe error: Get "http://10.130.0.3:8080/": dial tcp 10.130.0.3:8080: i/o timeout (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
body:
  Warning  ProbeError  4m (x717 over 126m)  kubelet  Readiness probe error: Get "http://10.130.0.3:8080/": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
body:




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451

How reproducible:

rare

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Install OCP with OVNKubernetes with HO enabled

defaultNetwork:
    type: OVNKubernetes
    ovnKubernetesConfig:
      hybridOverlayConfig:
        hybridClusterNetwork: []

2.
3.

Actual results:

Installation stuck due to network-check-target issue 

Expected results:

Installation should succeed

Additional info:

Will add additional logs

 

 

 

 

The DVO metrics gatherer in the Insights operator relies on the "deployment-validation-operator" namespace name, but this is not very good, because the DVO can be installed in other namespaces (e.g it's installed in the "openshift-operators" namespace when installing through OperatorHub)

Description of the problem:

assisted-installer-controller Job does not apply Additional Root CA Trust Bundle

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/issues/513

How reproducible:

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/issues/513

Steps to reproduce:

1.  Create cluster with proxy and additional certificate bundle

2.Install

Actual results:

Controller failed to reach service cause of self signed certificate

Expected results:

Installation succeeds

Description of problem:

When spot instances with taints are added to the cluster on AWS, machine-api-termination-handler daemonset pods do not launch on these instances because of the taints. 

machine-api-termination-handler is used for checking the notification of  intance termination, so if it doesn't launch properly, application pods on spot instances could stop without normal shut down procedures. 

It is common to use taint-toleration to specify workloads on spot instances, because it does not require changing application manifests of other workloads. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Creating ROSA cluster
2. Adding spot instances with taints on OCM
3. oc get daemonset machine-api-termination-handler -n openshift-machine-api

Actual results:

machine-api-termination-handler pods do not launch on spot instances

Expected results:

machine-api-termination-handler pods launch on spot instances

Additional info:

Adding followings to machine-api-termination-handler daemonset could resolve the problem.
---  
tolerations:        
- operator: Exists

Description of problem:

Egress IP is not being assigned to primary interface of node as per hostsubnet definition. The issue being observed at an Openshift cluster hosted on Disconnected AWS environment.  Following steps were performed at AWS end:

- Disconnected VPC was created and installation of Openshift was done as per documentation.
- Elastic IP could not be used as it is a disconnected environment. Customer identified a free IP from same subnet as the node and modified interface of the node to add a secondary IP.

It seems cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig annotation is need on the node to attach IP to primary interface but its missing. From SDN POD log on the same node I  could see its complaining about 'an incomplete annotation "cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig"'. Will share more details over comments.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift 4.10.28

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a disconnected environment on AWS
2. find a free IP from subnet where a worker node is hosted and add that as secondary  IP to NIC of that node.
3. Configure hostsubnet and netnamespace on Openshift cluster

Actual results:

- Eress IP is not being attached to primary interface of node for which hostsubnet has been configured

Expected results:

- Egress IP should get configured without any issue.

Additional info:


I'd disabled Telemetry for the bulk of the CI fleet in OTA-740. But that lead to many
failures for:

[sig-instrumentation] Prometheus when installed on the cluster should report telemetry if a cloud.openshift.com token is present [Late] [Skipped:Disconnected] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

We should extend the checks for Telemetry enablement to include telemeterClient.enabled in the monitoring-specific ConfigMap, as well as the previously-checked pull-secret token.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4190. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Two tests are perma failing in metal-ipi upgrade tests
[sig-imageregistry] Image registry remains available using new connections expand_more    39m27s
[sig-imageregistry] Image registry remains available using reused connections expand_more    39m27s

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12 / 4.13

How reproducible:

all ci runs

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Nov 24 02:58:26.998: INFO: "[sig-imageregistry] Image registry remains available using reused connections": panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference

Expected results:

pass

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4941. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem: This is a follow-up to OCPBUGS-3933.

The installer fails to destroy the cluster when the OpenStack object storage omits 'content-type' from responses, and a container is empty.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.8.z

How reproducible:

Likely not happening in customer environments where Swift is exposed directly. We're seeing the issue in our CI where we're using a non-RHOSP managed cloud.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

This bug is a copy of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137616 as fix needs to go on OCP side.
For must gather and attached screenshots please refer the bugzilla.
Add Capacity button does not exist after upgrade OCP version [OCP4.11->OCP4.12]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

ODF Version:4.11.3-3
OCP Version: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-24-103753
Provider: AWS

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Install ODF4.11 +OCP4.11
2.Upgrade OCP4.11 to OCP4.12
3.Log in to the OpenShift Web Console.
4.Click Operators → Installed Operators.
5.Click OpenShift Data Foundation Operator.
6.Click the Storage Systems tab.
7.Click the Action Menu (⋮) on the far right of the storage system name to extend the options menu.
"Add Capacity" button does not exist on menu.
*Attached Screenshot 

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4986. The following is the description of the original issue:

We should avoid errors like:

$ oc get -o json clusterversion version | jq -r '.status.history[0].acceptedRisks'
Forced through blocking failures: Precondition "ClusterVersionRecommendedUpdate" failed because of "UnknownUpdate": RetrievedUpdates=True (), so the update from 4.13.0-0.okd-2022-12-11-064650 to 4.13.0-0.okd-2022-12-13-052859 is probably neither recommended nor supported.

Instead, tweak the logic from OCPBUGS-2727, and only append the Forced through blocking failures: prefix when the forcing was required.

Description:

I was testing the DHCP scenario where only rendezvousIP is specified in the agent-config.yaml and no NMStateConfig is embedded. create-cluster-and-infraenv.service fails on node0 when networkConfig is missing from agent-config.yaml. /etc/assisted/manifests/nmstateconfig.yaml is an empty file.

agent-config.yaml used:

metadata:
name: ostest
namespace: cluster0
spec:
rendezvousIP: 192.168.122.2

Steps to reproduce:

1. Create agent.iso using install-config.yaml and agent-config.yaml
2. Deploy cluster using agent.iso
3. Log into node0 and create-cluster-and-infraenv.service will be displayed as a failed unit.

Expected:

create-cluster-and-infraenv.service in success state

Actual:

create-cluster-and-infraenv.service in failed state

Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 podman[2681]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=info msg="releaseImage version 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-08-04-074610 cpuarch x86_64"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 create-cluster-and-infraenv[2693]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=info msg="Registered cluster with id: 1cc3ea1a-5bbc-4c4d-ad66-6e052800fb0c"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 create-cluster-and-infraenv[2693]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=info msg="Registering infraenv"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 podman[2681]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=info msg="Registered cluster with id: 1cc3ea1a-5bbc-4c4d-ad66-6e052800fb0c"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 podman[2681]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=info msg="Registering infraenv"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 create-cluster-and-infraenv[2693]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=fatal msg="Failed to register infraenv with assisted-service: nmstateconfig should have at least one label set matching the infra-env label selector"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 podman[2681]: time="2022-08-05T08:27:59Z" level=fatal msg="Failed to register infraenv with assisted-service: nmstateconfig should have at least one label set matching the infra-env label selector"
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 systemd[1]: create-cluster-and-infraenv.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 systemd[1]: create-cluster-and-infraenv.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Aug 05 08:27:59 control1 systemd[1]: Failed to start Service that creates initial cluster and infraenv.

/etc/assisted/manifests/nmstateconfig.yaml is an empty file.

[core@control1 ~]$ sudo cat /etc/assisted/manifests/nmstateconfig.yaml
[core@control1 ~]$

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1704. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

According to OCP 4.11 doc (https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/installing/installing_gcp/installing-gcp-account.html#installation-gcp-enabling-api-services_installing-gcp-account), the Service Usage API (serviceusage.googleapis.com) is an optional API service to be enabled. But, the installation cannot succeed if this API is disabled.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-25-071630

How reproducible:

Always, if the Service Usage API is disabled in the GCP project.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Make sure the Service Usage API (serviceusage.googleapis.com) is disabled in the GCP project.
2. Try IPI installation in the GCP project. 

Actual results:

The installation would fail finally, without any worker machines launched.

Expected results:

Installation should succeed, or the OCP doc should be updated.

Additional info:

Please see the attached must-gather logs (http://virt-openshift-05.lab.eng.nay.redhat.com/jiwei/jiwei-0926-03-cnxn5/) and the sanity check results. 
FYI if enabling the API, and without changing anything else, the installation could succeed. 

Description of problem:

install 4.12 of IPv6 single stack disconnected cluster: etcd member is in abnormal status:

  1. oc get co|grep etcd
    etcd 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408 False True True 15h EtcdMembersAvailable: 1 of 2 members are available, openshift-qe-057.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com is unhealthy

E1026 03:35:58.409977 1 etcdmemberscontroller.go:73] Unhealthy etcd member found: openshift-qe-057.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com, took=, err=create client failure: failed to make etcd client for endpoints https://[26xx:52:0:1eb:3xx3:5xx:fxxe:7550]:2379: context deadline exceeded

How reproducible:
not Always

Steps to Reproduce:
As description
Actual results:
As title
Expected results
etcd co stauts is normal

Description of problem:

E2E CI feature files are failing as Mocha version couldn't be determined 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

CI Search : https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=Couldn%27t+determine+Mocha+version&maxAge=336h&context=1&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=pull-ci-openshift-console-operator-master-e2e-aws-console&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

E2E tests failing with `Couldn't determine Mocha version` error

Expected results:

E2E tests should pass without any failures

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5542. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
The project list orders projects by its name and is smart enough to keep a "numerical order" like:

  1. test-1
  2. test-2
  3. test-11

The more prominent project dropdown is not so smart and shows just a simple "ascii ordered" list:

  1. test-1
  2. test-11
  3. test-2

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8-4.13 (master)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create some new projects called test-1, test-11, test-2
2. Check the project list page (in admin perspective)
3. Check the project dropdown (in dev perspective)

Actual results:
Order is

  1. test-1
  2. test-11
  3. test-2

Expected results:
Order should be

  1. test-1
  2. test-2
  3. test-11

Additional info:
none

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5287. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/THREESCALE-9015.  A problem with the Red Hat Integration - 3scale - Managed Application Services operator prevents it from installing correctly, which results in the failure of operator-install-single-namespace.spec.ts integration test.

Description of problem:

Image registry pods panic while deploying OCP in ap-south-2 AWS region

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.2

How reproducible:

Deploy OCP in AWS ap-south-2 region

Steps to Reproduce:

Deploy OCP in AWS ap-south-2 region 

Actual results:

panic: Invalid region provided: ap-south-2

Expected results:

Image registry pods should come up with no errors

Additional info:

 

 

 

 

 

In the Known Issues section of the OpenStack-specific Installer docs issues, there is a point about control plane anti-affinity.

The known issue has several problems:

  • it is in the UPI section, when it is not a UPI-specific issue
  • it mentions Control plane scale-out, when OCP only supports exactly 3 masters
  • it is now possible to set anti-affinity from the install-config.yaml, and that should be the recommended solution when VM distribution across hosts is required.

Description of problem:

The Console Operator has a suite of tests responsible for assuring that Console can successfully interact with Operators managed by OLM. The operator-hub.spec test references an operator no longer present in the 4.12 certified operators catalog source: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/integration-tests-cypress/tests/operator-hub.spec.ts#L64

OLM is unable to set the default catalog sources to the 4.12 image tag until the test is update to reference an operator in both the 4.11 and 4.12 images of the certified operators catalog source.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):4.12


How reproducible: always


Steps to Reproduce:

1. Update the certified operators catalogSource images to the 4.12 tag
2. Attempt to run the operatorhub.spec test suite.

Actual results:

The test fails

Expected results:

The test passes

Additional info:


Description of problem:

The ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-master containers are continuously crashlooping since we updated to 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-10-15-073651.

Log Excerpt:

] [] []  [{kubectl-client-side-apply Update networking.k8s.io/v1 2022-09-12 12:25:06 +0000 UTC FieldsV1 {"f:metadata":{"f:annotations":{".":{},"f:kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration":{}}},"f:spec":{"f:ingress":{},"f:policyTypes":{}}} }]},Spec:NetworkPolicySpec{PodSelector:{map[] []},Ingress:[]NetworkPolicyIngressRule{NetworkPolicyIngressRule{Ports:[]NetworkPolicyPort{},From:[]NetworkPolicyPeer{NetworkPolicyPeer{PodSelector:&v1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels:map[string]string{access: true,},MatchExpressions:[]LabelSelectorRequirement{},},NamespaceSelector:nil,IPBlock:nil,},},},},Egress:[]NetworkPolicyEgressRule{},PolicyTypes:[Ingress],},} &NetworkPolicy{ObjectMeta:{allow-from-openshift-ingress  compsci-gradcentral  a405f84